Mitsui and Itochu Australian iron ore investment strengthens Asian steel supply chains

Australian Iron Ore

The Mitsui and Itochu Australian iron ore investment strengthens long term raw material security for Asian steelmakers. The two Japanese trading houses will acquire a combined 15% stake in the Ministers North iron ore projects from BHP in Western Australia. As a result, they will secure offtake rights from an expected 20mn t/yr operation, pending a final investment decision by June 2026.

This Mitsui and Itochu Australian iron ore investment also deepens long standing partnerships with BHP in the Pilbara. Itochu will hold an 8% stake and targets 1.6mn t/yr of iron ore, mainly for Chinese customers. Mitsui will take a 7% stake and aims to offtake about 1.4mn t/yr, supplying Japan and other Asian markets. Therefore, each firm will align offtake volumes with its equity share, reinforcing stable contractual flows rather than spot exposure.

Ministers North steps in as Yandi successor

The Ministers North project will effectively replace the aging Yandi mine jointly operated by BHP, Mitsui and Itochu. Yandi is scheduled for a gradual production decline and eventual closure, although the final shutdown date remains undisclosed. Therefore, Ministers North functions as a crucial continuity asset, preserving existing rail, port and blending synergies in Western Australia.

Project timing remains tied to a final investment decision scheduled by June 2026. Commercial operations could then ramp up to the envisaged 20mn t/yr run rate. However, the consortium must still navigate cost inflation, permitting timelines and infrastructure coordination with other Pilbara projects. If delivered on schedule, Ministers North will smooth the transition from Yandi without a major gap in supply.

Broader Pilbara strategy behind Mitsui and Itochu Australian iron ore investment

The Mitsui and Itochu Australian iron ore investment also sits within a wider Pilbara growth strategy. Mitsui separately announced a $5.3bn commitment in February to acquire a 40% share in the Rhodes Ridge joint venture. The company aims to start commercial operations there by around 2030, although the final investment decision schedule is still under review.

Together, Ministers North and Rhodes Ridge will anchor Mitsui’s long term iron ore portfolio in Western Australia. Meanwhile, Itochu’s additional stake in Ministers North underpins its iron ore flows to China during a period of changing demand patterns. As a result, the Mitsui and Itochu Australian iron ore investment reinforces Japan’s broader goal of diversified, low risk iron ore sourcing across key Asian markets.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This deal shows how Japanese trading houses quietly rebuild long term security in iron ore rather than chase short term price cycles. By backing Ministers North as Yandi’s successor and supporting Rhodes Ridge, Mitsui and Itochu lock in future Pilbara options while steel demand in Asia matures. Market participants should watch how offtake contracts and quality specifications evolve, especially for blends tailored to China and Japan’s decarbonising steel sectors.

Asian Investor Climate Policy Advocacy Rises as Transition Finance Needs Clearer Rules

AIGCC

Asian investor climate policy advocacy is accelerating as more asset owners and managers push governments for clearer frameworks to support climate investment. The Asia Investor Group on Climate Change said investors across the region are moving beyond broad net zero pledges toward more direct engagement on policy.

Asian investor climate policy advocacy is becoming more important because Asia’s energy transition depends heavily on regulation, project approvals and national transition roadmaps. Markets across the region differ widely in policy maturity, carbon rules, disclosure standards and grid planning.

Asian investor climate policy advocacy now extends beyond emissions targets. Investors are calling for stronger sector transition plans, technology support, physical climate risk frameworks, nature-related disclosures and just transition policies.

The shift matters for metals and industrial supply chains. More investible climate policy can unlock capital for energy storage, renewable power, transmission, low-carbon transport and green infrastructure, all of which require large volumes of copper, aluminium, battery materials, electrical steel and critical minerals.

Energy Storage and Grid Investment Draw More Capital

Energy storage has become one of the clearest winners from stronger climate policy interest. The share of surveyed investors interested in energy storage doubled to 82% in 2025 from 40% in 2023.

This is an important signal for battery metals. Storage growth can support demand for lithium, iron phosphate, graphite, copper, aluminium and power electronics materials, even when electric vehicle growth becomes uneven.

Renewable power generation and transmission are also attracting investor attention. These sectors require long-term policy certainty because projects depend on grid access, permitting, tariff structures and reliable revenue models.

Green infrastructure, low-carbon transport and nature-based solutions are also gaining interest. But capital will move fastest where governments provide clear investment rules, predictable transition pathways and credible national targets.

The report shows that investors are becoming more practical. They are no longer only setting portfolio-level climate targets. They are asking governments to create the conditions needed for real projects to be financed.

Transition Plans Remain the Missing Link

Investor climate commitments are rising, but implementation remains uneven. The share of investors with net zero portfolio pledges increased to 45% in 2025 from 40% in 2024, while 33% have set interim targets.

However, only 22% of investors published a climate transition plan in 2025, unchanged from the previous year. This gap matters because transition plans connect targets with capital allocation, engagement priorities and risk management.

Just transition strategies are even less developed. Only 11% of investors have adopted one, showing that social and regional impacts remain under-integrated in climate finance.

Asia’s transition will require place-based planning. Coal-heavy markets, export-driven manufacturing hubs, emerging economies and advanced financial centres all need different pathways.

For metals producers and industrial companies, this creates both opportunity and scrutiny. Investors will increasingly prefer companies with credible decarbonisation strategies, resilient supply chains and exposure to climate-enabling materials.

The broader message is clear. Climate finance in Asia is moving from ambition toward execution, but policy certainty and transition planning must improve before capital can scale at the speed required.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Asian investors are telling governments that climate capital needs bankable rules, not slogans. For metals markets, the strongest signal is energy storage: policy clarity could turn climate finance into real demand for copper, aluminium, lithium and grid materials.

US Turkey LFP Battery Partnership Targets 7GWh Production by 2027

Our Next Energy

US Turkey LFP battery partnership emerged as Our Next Energy (ONE) contracted Turkish manufacturer Pomega Energy Storage Technologies to produce 7GWh of lithium iron phosphate battery cells. The strategic US Turkey LFP battery collaboration targets 2GWh production in 2026 escalating to 5GWh in 2027, supporting ONE's energy storage solutions for utility, commercial, and industrial customers while bridging manufacturing capacity before domestic US production commences.

Strategic Manufacturing Timeline Bridges International and Domestic Production

US Turkey LFP battery production will focus on ONE's 314Ah LFP battery cells manufactured at Pomega's Ankara facility. The Turkish facility maintains 3GWh installed capacity and currently undergoes qualification for global export markets. This partnership provides immediate manufacturing access while ONE develops its Michigan-based grid battery production line scheduled for 2027 operations.

Meanwhile, the collaboration enables ONE to meet near-term customer demands without delayed market entry. Founder and CEO Mujeeb Ijaz emphasized the partnership's role in supporting customer commitments during the transition to US-based manufacturing capabilities. The phased approach reduces market risks while ensuring continuous supply chain operations across international and domestic facilities.

Turkish Manufacturing Hub Supports Global Battery Supply Chains

However, Pomega's Ankara facility represents Turkey's growing position in global battery manufacturing ecosystems. The facility's 3GWh capacity and export qualification process demonstrate Turkish manufacturing capabilities in advanced energy storage technologies. Turkey's strategic geographic position provides advantageous access to European, Middle Eastern, and Asian markets for battery exports.

Therefore, the partnership leverages Turkey's industrial infrastructure while supporting ONE's expansion strategy across utility-scale energy storage markets. Turkish manufacturing costs and skilled workforce availability create competitive advantages for large-scale battery production. The collaboration also strengthens US-Turkey commercial relationships in critical technology sectors driving clean energy transitions.

Market Positioning for Utility-Scale Energy Storage Growth

Furthermore, the LFP battery production targets utility, commercial, and industrial energy storage applications experiencing rapid market expansion. Lithium iron phosphate technology offers safety and cost advantages compared to alternative battery chemistries, particularly for large-scale stationary storage installations. The 314Ah cell specification aligns with industry requirements for grid-scale energy storage systems.

As a result, ONE's dual-facility strategy positions the company competitively across North American and international markets during the critical 2026-2027 period. The Turkish production capacity provides flexibility while Michigan facility development progresses, ensuring market presence during peak demand growth. This geographic diversification reduces supply chain risks while maximizing market opportunities across multiple regions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

ONE's partnership with Turkish manufacturer Pomega exemplifies how US battery companies strategically leverage international manufacturing partnerships to bridge capacity gaps before domestic production scaling, particularly important as global LFP demand accelerates faster than domestic manufacturing development. The collaboration demonstrates Turkey's emerging role as a strategic manufacturing hub for critical battery technologies, positioning the country advantageously within global energy storage supply chains serving both European and American markets.

Nornickel 2025 Earnings Rise as PGM Prices and Asian Sales Support Growth

Nornickel

Nornickel 2025 earnings improved as stronger precious metals prices and higher sales volumes lifted results. Revenue rose 10pc to $13.76bn, while Ebitda increased 9pc to $5.67bn. Net profit climbed 36pc to $2.47bn. As a result, Nornickel 2025 earnings showed that stronger palladium and copper markets offset a weaker nickel environment.

This performance matters because the company is still adjusting to a very different trade map. Western sanctions have made payments, logistics, and equipment access more difficult. Nornickel responded by redirecting more sales to Asia, especially China. Therefore, Nornickel 2025 earnings were shaped not only by prices, but also by market reorientation.

Metal sales were the main earnings driver. Revenue from metal sales reached $12.98bn in 2025, supported by higher precious metals sales volumes and stronger prices for most metals except nickel. Consequently, palladium prices and Asian metals sales became central to the company’s latest financial improvement.

Asian Metals Sales Are Reshaping Nornickel’s Strategy

Asian metals sales are no longer a short-term response. They are becoming part of Nornickel’s longer-term industrial strategy. The company is exploring moving part of its copper smelting capacity to China by 2027. It is also deepening ties with Chinese buyers for battery and industrial materials. As a result, Nornickel 2025 earnings reflect a structural pivot as much as a cyclical recovery.

This shift matters because Asia now offers both demand and processing depth. China remains the largest consumer in several key metals markets. That gives Nornickel a clearer path to sustain volumes despite weaker western demand. Meanwhile, the company is trying to reduce its dependence on western equipment suppliers through modernization and local adaptation.

Nickel Market Surplus Still Limits the Full Upside

Nickel market surplus remains the biggest challenge in Nornickel’s portfolio. The company estimates global nickel supply reached 3.86mn t in 2025, above demand of 3.62mn t. That created a surplus of around 240,000t. Therefore, Nornickel 2025 earnings improved despite nickel, not because of it.

The outlook for copper and palladium looks more supportive. Copper demand continues to benefit from grid investment, renewable energy, and data center growth. Palladium markets also stayed broadly balanced, supported by automotive demand and hybrid vehicles. As a result, copper and palladium remain the more constructive parts of Nornickel’s earnings story.

Nornickel still plans to keep nickel output stable in 2026 at around 193,000-203,000t. That signals a focus on operational efficiency rather than aggressive expansion. Consequently, the company appears more focused on protecting margins and upgrading assets than chasing volume growth in an oversupplied market.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Nornickel’s results show that the company is benefiting from stronger precious metals and smarter market redirection, even while nickel stays under pressure. The bigger story is strategic. Nornickel is gradually redesigning its trade and processing footprint around Asia while waiting for nickel fundamentals to improve.

India exports first low-grade manganese ore as Moil opens new trade channel

Manganese Ore

India exports first low-grade manganese ore as state-owned miner Moil ships its first cargo to Indonesia. The move, where India exports first low-grade manganese ore under a new State Trading Enterprise mandate, highlights New Delhi’s push to monetise surplus low-grade Mn fines. As India exports first low-grade manganese ore, it also signals a more active role in seaborne minerals markets.

Moil leads India’s first low-grade manganese ore export

Moil has executed India’s first low-grade manganese ore export through the port of Visakhapatnam. The inaugural consignment totalled 54,600t and sailed for Indonesia on 22 August. Under the State Trading Enterprise regime, Moil now controls all exports of manganese ore below 46pc grade.

This mandate centralises export decision-making for low-grade Mn ore in a single state-backed entity. Therefore Moil can aggregate domestic supply, coordinate pricing and negotiate offtake with overseas buyers. The new mechanism also connects Indian suppliers with international customers, improving transparency and logistics.

India exports first low-grade manganese ore at a time when many steelmakers prefer higher-grade feedstock. However, low-grade material remains attractive for specific processes, blending and cost-sensitive markets. Indonesia’s growing manganese and alloy demand provides a natural first destination for this trade.

Surplus low-grade Mn reserves drive export strategy

India holds large reserves of low-grade manganese ore that exceed domestic demand. Historically, these fines faced limited commercial outlets or were underutilised in domestic steel and alloy production. As a result, policymakers now see exports as a way to unlock stranded value and diversify mineral revenues.

By ensuring India exports first low-grade manganese ore through a structured channel, Moil can build a pricing and quality benchmark. Over time, repeat shipments could establish Indian-origin low-grade Mn as a recognised segment in Asian markets. Meanwhile, exports may help optimise mine plans by monetising materials previously considered marginal.

The state’s decision to use a dedicated trading enterprise also aims to avoid fragmented, opportunistic deals. A coordinated approach can support better freight optimisation, contract discipline and adherence to environmental and social standards. If successful, this model could be replicated for other surplus low-grade ores.

The Metalnomist Commentary

India’s first low-grade manganese export is small in global volume terms but big in signalling intent. If Moil can scale this trade while maintaining quality and reliability, India could emerge as a regular low-grade Mn supplier to Southeast Asia. Market participants should watch future tenders, destination diversity and pricing trends against African and Australian material.

Asian Aluminium Premiums Stay Subdued as QMJP Offers Test Buyer Resistance

Aluminum

Asian aluminium premiums remained subdued this week as buyers assessed sharply higher quarterly cif main Japan port offers for July-September delivery. Two major producers opened QMJP negotiations at $460/t and $480/t, far above the April-June settlement of $350-353/t.

Asian aluminium premiums are now being pulled in two directions. Western-origin metal has tightened after the Iran war disrupted supply, giving producers a basis for higher offers. However, weak demand and greater availability of alternative units are limiting spot-market momentum.

Asian aluminium premiums also remain below the new QMJP offers. Current spot indications are around $320-380/t, while P1020 fca Korea indications for non-Russian material were heard at $320-350/t.

The gap between producer offers and spot levels suggests buyers may resist paying the full proposed premium. If QMJP settles above $400/t, non-western brands could continue trading below the benchmark.

Western-Origin Tightness Supports Higher Producer Offers

The higher QMJP offers reflect tighter availability of western-origin aluminium in Asia. Supply disruption linked to the Iran war has reduced confidence in some traditional flows, pushing producers to test stronger premium levels.

This is important because QMJP remains a key reference for aluminium trade across Asia. A high settlement can influence physical premiums, contract pricing and buyer behaviour beyond Japan.

However, the market is not uniformly tight. Some Asian smelters have received enquiries and are willing to sell into Europe or offer small volumes in Asia. Others prefer to wait for clearer direction from the QMJP negotiations.

This cautious behaviour shows how benchmark talks can freeze spot activity. Buyers do not want to commit at high levels before the benchmark is settled, while sellers do not want to underprice material if premiums rise.

The immediate market signal is therefore uncertainty, not shortage. Western-origin units command support, but broader aluminium availability remains mixed.

Stranded Wire and Russian Units Cap Spot Upside

Alternative supply is limiting the impact of higher QMJP offers. Stranded wire and Russian-origin aluminium units are weighing on sales of other brands, especially where buyers are more price-sensitive.

China’s exports of aluminium stranded wire rose sharply in April. Shipments under HS code 761490 increased by 166% year on year to 15,567t.

South Korea and Vietnam absorbed much larger volumes. Chinese shipments to South Korea surged to 2,911t, while shipments to Vietnam climbed to 2,288t. Exports to Thailand also rose to 619t.

These flows matter because stranded wire can create substitute supply pressure in regional aluminium markets. When alternative units are available, buyers have less urgency to accept premium increases for standard brands.

Russian-origin aluminium also remains a price-sensitive factor. Some buyers continue to avoid Russian material for policy or corporate reasons, but availability still affects regional market balance and non-western brand pricing.

Demand remains the bigger constraint. Buyers are likely to reduce volumes if both LME prices and QMJP premiums stay high. This limits the ability of producers to convert tight western-origin supply into broad spot-market price gains.

The next quarter may therefore produce a divided market. Western-origin material could secure stronger contract premiums, while non-western and alternative units trade at discounts.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Asia’s aluminium market is not rejecting higher premiums; it is questioning which metal deserves them. The real split is between tight western-origin supply and a softer regional market still supported by stranded wire, Russian units and weak demand.

European Stainless Tube Trade Shifts as Policy, Imports and Data Centres Reshape Demand

European Stainless Steel

European stainless tube trade is entering a more selective phase as producers defend margins through higher-value applications, tighter specifications and regional supply advantages. The market remains stable, but it is no longer driven mainly by volume growth.

European stainless tube trade is being reshaped by three forces at once. Imports continue to pressure commodity and process pipe segments. Policy measures such as CBAM and revised safeguards are changing cost structures. At the same time, automotive exhaust demand is declining as electrification advances.

Speakers at SMR’s Stainless Steel Tube and Pipe Market Insights Day in Dusseldorf said Europe is behaving like a mature and cyclical market. Asia remains the main centre of stainless steel consumption and commodity production, while Europe depends more on technical applications, certification and regulatory positioning.

European stainless tube trade is therefore moving away from simple price competition. Producers are increasingly competing on quality, traceability, sustainability, lead times and the ability to serve complex end uses.

Italy-based Marcegaglia Specialties said traditional sectors such as construction, energy, oil and gas, automotive, water and food processing remain the backbone of demand. However, the next stage of competition will depend more on sustainability and product complexity than on basic market expansion.

CBAM and Import Pressure Are Regionalising Stainless Tube Supply

European stainless tube trade is becoming more regional because policy and geopolitics are increasing the value of local supply. CBAM, revised safeguard measures and wider instability are pushing buyers to look more carefully at origin, emissions, delivery risk and compliance.

European producers already operate inside the EU regulatory framework. This gives them an advantage in some higher-value applications where customers require reliable documentation, stable quality and shorter supply chains.

But the policy environment is not simple. Some industry speakers warned that CBAM could become more protectionist than environmental if it raises costs for European downstream processors without fully addressing import competition.

This concern is especially relevant for stainless tube makers. They buy input material under EU cost structures, but still compete with imported finished or semi-finished products in certain market segments.

OSTP chief executive Andrea Gatti argued that CBAM and revised tariff-rate quotas are creating a difficult environment for downstream processors. He said the measures can raise raw material costs for European producers while leaving import pressure unresolved in some product categories.

One concern is the way carbon steel and stainless steel products remain grouped in some quota categories. This can obscure the real level of import pressure in specific stainless segments.

The issue is most visible in process pipe. Overall import penetration in European welded stainless pipe may look moderate, but import pressure is much stronger in process pipe than in automotive or structural applications.

Some imported process pipe is arriving at prices close to European producers’ raw material costs. This creates a serious margin problem for EU producers, especially when they must meet higher regulatory, labour and energy costs.

Asian imports are particularly competitive in pipe and fittings made to ASTM specifications. Around 15-20% of the European market still requires ASTM-based products, often because older engineering standards and end-user specifications remain in place.

This creates an opening for Asian suppliers. Many have long experience producing ASTM-based products and can compete aggressively in segments where buyers focus mainly on price and basic compliance.

Asian producers are also becoming more capable of supplying European-standard material. However, some barriers remain. Hot-rolled feedstock availability, customer qualification and more complex technical requirements still protect parts of the European market.

CBAM adds another layer of uncertainty. Importers and buyers still lack full visibility on the actual carbon values that overseas suppliers will declare. Some emissions disclosures remain incomplete or unreliable.

This creates pricing uncertainty. If importers use default emissions values, CBAM costs may rise sharply. If suppliers provide certified actual data, costs may be lower. But the market does not yet know which overseas suppliers can verify emissions credibly.

For European producers, this uncertainty is both an opportunity and a risk. It may make some imports less attractive, but it also complicates raw material sourcing and customer negotiations.

The broader result is regionalisation. Buyers are increasingly weighing whether cheaper imported material is worth the compliance, delivery and emissions risk. European producers can benefit if they turn regulation into a trusted supply advantage.

However, they cannot rely on regulation alone. Imports will continue to pressure standard grades and process pipe where price remains decisive. Europe’s defence must therefore come from technical capability, service and qualification depth.

Automotive Decline and Data Centres Redefine Growth Applications

European stainless tube producers also face structural demand change in automotive applications. Exhaust-related stainless tube demand is declining as electric vehicle adoption reduces the long-term need for combustion engine systems.

German tubemaker Schoeller Werk said about 40% of its business is still linked to automotive. Around 95% of that automotive exposure is tied to combustion engine applications.

This creates a clear transition risk. Combustion engine exhaust systems have historically used stainless tube because of heat resistance, corrosion performance and durability. Electric vehicles remove much of that demand.

Industry speakers described this shift as irreversible, even if the speed varies by region. Combustion vehicles may remain relevant for some years, but the structural direction is clear.

Marcegaglia also described the shift away from combustion-engine vehicles as a trend that stainless tube producers must manage. The market cannot assume that traditional automotive exhaust demand will return.

This forces producers to find new growth areas. Data centres emerged as one of the clearest near-term opportunities during the Dusseldorf discussions.

Data centre stainless demand is growing because cooling systems are becoming more important. AI workloads, higher server density and larger hyperscale facilities require more advanced thermal management.

Stainless tubes can be used in cooling circuits, heat exchangers and wider water infrastructure. These applications often require corrosion resistance, reliability and long service life.

Gatti said the strongest opportunity may not only sit in outer water infrastructure. Inner cooling circuits also present growth potential as specifications increasingly exclude carbon steel and favour copper or stainless steel.

Copper’s high price is helping stainless steel compete. In some data centre applications, stainless can win substitution from copper on cost grounds while still meeting performance requirements.

This creates a valuable opening for European producers. Data centres are not only a volume market. They require quality, traceability, reliability and tight specifications, which fit Europe’s competitive strengths.

However, Asian competition remains a threat. If data centre projects are specified to ASTM standards, Asian suppliers may still compete strongly. This means European producers need early involvement in specifications and project qualification.

Other higher-value markets may also support growth. Specialist energy systems, premium process pipe, food processing, water treatment and industrial heat exchangers all require more complex tube products.

The key difference is that these markets reward performance rather than only price. European producers are better positioned when customers value certification, documentation, short lead times, sustainability and technical support.

This is why Europe’s competitive advantage increasingly lies in complexity. Producers cannot win every commodity segment against lower-cost imports. But they can defend and grow in applications where failure risk, qualification standards and technical requirements matter.

The next decade will likely reward producers that invest in advanced materials and difficult applications. This includes higher corrosion resistance, special dimensions, better surface quality, stronger traceability and lower-carbon documentation.

Policy could help if it is implemented carefully. CBAM and safeguards may support regional supply, but they must avoid damaging downstream processors through higher input costs or poorly designed quota structures.

The real test for Europe is execution. Producers must turn sustainability and regulation into commercial value, not only compliance costs. That means proving lower carbon intensity, shorter logistics chains and stronger product reliability.

European stainless tube trade will therefore become more segmented. Commodity and ASTM process pipe will remain import-sensitive. Automotive exhaust demand will decline. Data centres and complex industrial applications will become more important.

For producers, the strategy is clear. Europe must compete where technical standards, certification, sustainability and customer proximity matter most.

The Metalnomist Commentary

European stainless tube producers are being pushed out of low-margin commodity competition and into higher-specification markets. The winners will be companies that convert regulation, traceability and technical complexity into pricing power, especially in data centres, energy systems and premium process pipe.

Outokumpu Pushes for Tighter EU Steel Safeguards

Outokumpu

Outokumpu is putting EU steel safeguards at the centre of Europe’s industrial and climate debate. The Finnish stainless producer argues that current EU steel safeguards are too weak in the face of Asian overcapacity, diverted imports and sluggish European demand. As a result, Outokumpu says stronger EU steel safeguards are now essential to protect strategic supply chains and the business case for green steel investment.

Outokumpu links safeguards to decarbonisation and strategic autonomy

Outokumpu warns that Europe faces a surge of low-priced Asian stainless imports just as demand remains weak. The company argues that US tariffs of 50pc on steel are pushing excess volumes away from the US and into the EU market. Therefore, it believes new EU steel safeguards must prevent Europe from becoming a dumping ground for surplus Asian stainless steel. The company frames stronger safeguards as vital for mobility, infrastructure, defence and clean-tech value chains.

Outokumpu also connects trade defence directly to climate policy and low-carbon steel investment. It highlights its own stainless footprint of 1.6kg CO₂e/kg, versus a global average near 7kg CO₂e/kg. That advantage relies on high scrap usage and low-carbon power, which also increase production costs. Without tougher EU steel safeguards, Outokumpu argues, higher-emission Asian material will undercut European producers and undermine decarbonisation.

A blueprint for stricter quotas and carbon-aware trade rules

Outokumpu has tabled a detailed proposal for the next safeguard regime after 2026. It wants global tariff-rate quotas with strict per-country limits based on low-demand years such as 2012-13. Under its plan, imports above quota would face a 50pc tariff, with origin defined by melt-and-pour to block circumvention. It also opposes any quota carry-over, which can create import surges at quarter-end and destabilise prices.

The company calls for regular reviews of quota levels and tariffs, plus an emergency mechanism for sudden demand shocks. That mechanism would allow the EU to react if steel demand rebounds or if geopolitical events reshape trade flows. Outokumpu says the goal is to restore sustainable capacity utilisation and profitability for European mills. It stresses that, if Asian production displaces European output, Europe’s carbon footprint will rise and valuable stainless scrap will remain under-used.

Outokumpu further warns of growing strategic dependence on Indonesia and China if Brussels fails to act. In its view, weaker safeguards risk eroding European melting capacity and hollowing out the region’s stainless value chain. That would leave downstream manufacturers more exposed to external shocks and politically driven export restrictions. Stronger EU steel safeguards, the company argues, are therefore not only about prices, but also about security of supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Outokumpu’s intervention shows how trade defence, scrap utilisation and decarbonisation are now tightly interconnected in stainless steel. Brussels will need to balance open markets with credible protection for low-carbon producers if it wants green steel investment to continue. How the next safeguard package is designed will shape Europe’s stainless landscape – and its climate credentials – for the next decade.

South32 Gemco Manganese Exports Resume After Cyclone Megan Recovery

South32

South32 Gemco manganese exports restarted as the Australian metal producer shipped its first ore cargo since early 2024 from the Northern Territory mine. The South32 Gemco manganese exports resumption follows extensive recovery operations after Cyclone Megan damaged the export wharf and flooded mine areas in March 2024, forcing a four-month suspension that disrupted global manganese supply chains and affected key customers including GFG Alliance's Tasmania ferromanganese plant.

Production Recovery Targets Pre-Cyclone Output Levels

South32 Gemco manganese exports began with the loading of 56,606 tonnes aboard the Singapore-flagged Stenia Colossus on May 19th, bound for Tianjin, China according to marine analytics firm Kpler. A second shipment of 54,078 tonnes will depart on the Panamanian-flagged Loch Crinan on May 28th, demonstrating operational momentum recovery. These initial shipments mark the end of a 15-month export hiatus that severely impacted Australian manganese supply to Asian steel markets.

Meanwhile, South32 plans production ramping at Gemco's 6 million tonne annual nameplate capacity facility throughout the 2025-26 financial year. The company achieved 5.9 million tonnes production in 2022-23, the last complete year before Cyclone Megan disrupted operations. Northern Territory government projections indicate 5 million tonnes expected production over the coming year, though South32 has not released official 2025-26 guidance.

Customer Supply Chain Disruptions Highlight Market Dependencies

However, the extended Gemco shutdown created severe supply chain disruptions for downstream customers dependent on Australian manganese ore. GFG Alliance's Liberty Bell Bay ferromanganese plant in Tasmania moved to limited operations on May 19th due to manganese ore supply shortages. This operational reduction demonstrates the critical importance of Gemco's production for regional ferromanganese manufacturing capabilities.

Therefore, the export resumption addresses urgent supply needs across Asia-Pacific steel and ferroalloy markets that experienced significant manganese ore shortages during Gemco's closure. Chinese steel mills particularly depend on Australian manganese imports for steel production, making Gemco's recovery essential for regional supply chain stability. The mine's strategic location in Northern Territory provides efficient shipping access to major Asian industrial centers.

Infrastructure Recovery Enables Full Operational Restart

Furthermore, South32 completed extensive infrastructure repairs including export wharf reconstruction and comprehensive mine dewatering operations during January-March 2025. These recovery investments ensure sustainable long-term operations while improving resilience against future extreme weather events. The company's commitment to full production restoration demonstrates confidence in manganese market fundamentals and customer demand recovery.

As a result, Gemco's operational restart strengthens Australia's position as a critical manganese supplier to global steel industries while reducing supply chain vulnerabilities exposed during the extended shutdown. The successful recovery operations establish operational precedents for managing extreme weather impacts on mining infrastructure. Market participants welcome the supply restoration as global steel production continues recovering from pandemic-related disruptions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The resumption of South32's Gemco manganese exports illustrates both the vulnerability of critical mineral supply chains to extreme weather events and the interconnected nature of global steel production networks. The 15-month disruption's impact on downstream ferromanganese producers like Liberty Bell Bay demonstrates how single-mine shutdowns can cascade through entire industrial sectors, highlighting the need for greater supply chain diversification and resilience planning in critical minerals markets.

Asia-Pacific Growth Slows as US-Iran Conflict Raises Energy and Trade Risks

ADB(The Asian Development Bank)

Asia-Pacific growth is expected to slow in 2026 and 2027 as the US-Iran conflict and renewed trade uncertainty weigh on the region’s economic outlook. The Asian Development Bank now forecasts regional growth of 5.1% in both years, down from 5.4% in 2025.

Asia-Pacific growth was stronger last year because companies front-loaded exports before US tariff increases, semiconductor demand stayed high, and private consumption remained firm. But the ADB said the Middle East conflict now presents the largest risk to the region.

Asia-Pacific growth remains supported by domestic demand, steady labour markets and public infrastructure spending. However, prolonged disruption could raise energy and food prices, tighten financial conditions and weaken industrial momentum across key manufacturing economies.

Energy Shock Threatens Inflation and Industrial Demand

The ADB based its latest outlook on assumptions finalised in early March, shortly after the war began. Those assumptions expected the conflict to stabilise early, but the bank said later evidence now points to a higher risk of prolonged disruption.

Regional inflation is projected at 3.6% in 2026 and 3.4% in 2027 under the early-stabilisation scenario. If the conflict lasts through the third quarter, inflation could rise to 5.6% in 2026.

This matters for metals and manufacturing because Asia remains central to global supply chains for steel, aluminium, copper products, batteries, semiconductors, electronics and automotive components. Higher energy costs could pressure margins, slow investment and reduce demand for industrial raw materials.

Trade uncertainty adds another risk. Export front-loading helped 2025 growth, but that support is fading as manufacturers adjust to tariffs, weaker global trade and shifting procurement strategies.

China, India and Asean Face Uneven Growth Paths

China’s growth is forecast to slow to 4.6% in 2026 and 4.5% in 2027, from 5% last year. Subdued private consumption, property market weakness and slower export expansion are expected to weigh on activity.

The Chinese slowdown remains important for global metals markets. China is the largest consumer of many industrial and battery metals, so weaker growth can quickly affect copper, aluminium, nickel, zinc, rare earths and lithium demand expectations.

India’s growth is forecast to fall to 6.9% this year from 7.6% last year, before recovering to 7.3% in 2027. Resilient domestic consumption, recent trade agreements and structural reforms are expected to support the rebound.

Asean growth is projected at 4.6% in both 2026 and 2027, slightly below 4.8% in 2025. Infrastructure spending and domestic demand should provide stability, but weaker exports and fading front-loading effects could limit manufacturing momentum.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The ADB forecast shows that Asia’s growth engine is still running, but energy security and trade risk are becoming stronger constraints. For metals markets, the key issue is whether infrastructure spending can offset weaker exports and higher industrial costs.

US Copper Scrap Exports Reach Six-Year High in 2024

Copper Scrap

Total Copper Scrap Shipments Surge by 15%, Led by Strong Demand from China and Asia

In 2024, US copper scrap exports hit their highest levels in six years, marking a 15% increase from the previous year. Total copper scrap exports rose to 310,200 metric tonnes (mt), up from 270,100 mt in 2023. According to data compiled by Global Trade Tracker, this surge reflects rising demand across all forms of copper scrap.

Strong Growth in Copper Scrap Exports to China and Asia

Among the different categories of copper scrap, exports of bare bright scrap increased by 1.7%, reaching 81,400 tonnes in 2024. A significant portion of this growth was driven by a 3,200-tonne increase in exports to China. Exports of #1 copper scrap, which rose by 20% to approximately 112,400 tonnes, were also dominated by demand from China, which received 19,700 tonnes more than the previous year. Similarly, exports of #2 copper scrap saw a 21% increase, totaling over 116,500 tonnes, with higher deliveries to China, Malaysia, and Thailand.

This growing demand from Asian markets, particularly China, has contributed to the rise in US copper scrap exports. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) copper price for 2024 averaged $4.23 per pound, a 37¢ increase compared to 2023. Asian #1 copper scrap discounts averaged 19¢ per pound under the CME price, widening from the previous year’s 13¢ per pound. As a result, consumers faced a 31¢ per pound increase compared to the previous year due to the elevated exchange price.

Copper Scrap Exports: A Key Indicator of Global Demand

The rise in US copper scrap exports is a clear indicator of the strong global demand for copper, particularly in Asia. With China and other countries ramping up their copper production and consumption, the US remains a critical player in the copper supply chain. As demand for copper continues to grow, especially for use in green technologies and infrastructure, copper scrap exports will likely remain a vital component of the global market.

US copper scrap exports rise in July

Copper Scrap

US copper scrap exports rise in July as buyers shift from China to other Asian markets. Total copper scrap exports rose 16pc year on year to 29,005t, extending a three-month uptrend amid changing trade flows. However, weakness in China’s economy and property sector curbed its intake every month since December, forcing US suppliers to diversify destinations. Meanwhile, US copper scrap exports rise in July also reflects pre-emptive buying before proposed US tariffs intended to promote domestic sourcing. Therefore, exporters leaned into stronger demand from Japan and India, while China-bound volumes collapsed.

Trade flows pivot to Japan and India

US copper scrap exports rise in July with Japan showing the largest gain, adding 4,973t of receipts. As a result, shipments to China fell by 95pc, a drop of 11,081t, underscoring a decisive market pivot. Moreover, bare bright volumes surged 120pc to 13,200t on increased exports to India, offsetting declines in #1 and #2 grades. However, #1 copper scrap slipped 3pc to 8,916t as China took just 135t versus 5,288t a year earlier. Exports of #2 scrap fell 30pc to 6,888t, marking an eighth straight monthly decline led by a 98pc collapse to China.

Price arbitrage widens discounts and drives opportunistic sales

US copper scrap exports rise in July amid record CME pricing and wider arbitrage. The CME next-active copper contract averaged $5.48/lb, up $1.12/lb from July 2024, and set a $5.82/lb daily high. Consequently, Asian #1 scrap discounts widened to an average 83¢/lb under CME versus 25¢/lb a year earlier. Consumers still paid $4.65/lb for #1 scrap, 54¢/lb more year on year, reflecting exchange-linked uplift. Meanwhile, an average $1.08/lb arbitrage, up from 45¢/lb in June, encouraged July buying as market participants positioned around proposed US trade measures. The announced 50pc duty on copper cathodes slated for 1 August was not implemented, but the signaling effect supported mid-summer export activity.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The shift away from China and toward Japan and India confirms a structural re-routing of US copper scrap. Watch discounts versus CME and policy headlines as leading indicators for Q4 flows, while grade-mix dynamics may continue to favor bare bright over #1 and #2.

Crown warns aluminum can supply will tighten through 2025

Crown Holdings

Crown says aluminum can supply will tighten through late 2025 as demand outpaces capacity. The aluminum can supply outlook reflects stronger North American and European orders despite Asian tariff headwinds. As a result, Crown will boost efficiency and expand plants to protect aluminum can supply.

Demand growth offsets Asia weakness

Crown reports second-quarter growth across key end markets. North American beverage can shipments rose 1pc from the first quarter. European beverage can volumes increased 7pc, while North American food cans gained 5pc. However, Asia-Pacific volumes declined on tariff-driven weakness. Crown notes tariffs did not hit its Americas or European markets.

Capacity additions in Brazil and southern Europe

Crown will add a third line at Ponta Grossa, Brazil. The project lifts capacity to 3.6bn cans a year from 2.4bn. Commercial production is targeted for the third quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, Crown is modernizing Korinthos, Greece. It will also add a new line at a southern Europe site to be named. These moves aim to relieve regional tightness and cut logistics bottlenecks.

Stronger can demand supports upstream aluminum coil and coating suppliers. Therefore, brand owners should secure 2025-2026 volumes early. Crown’s efficiency push and brownfield upgrades should help balance regional imbalances over time.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Crown’s expansion signals sustained beverage packaging growth despite Asian softness. Expect contract pricing to favor reliable converters until new lines start. Watch Brazil and Greece timelines closely; any slippage could amplify near-term tightness.

LG Energy Solution Invests in Lopal’s Indonesian LFP Plant to Strengthen Global Battery Supply Chain

LG Energy Solution (LGES)

$15.97 Million Investment Secures Access to 30,000t/year of Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode Material in Phase 1

LG Energy Solution Expands LFP Footprint Through Strategic Investment in Indonesia

South Korea’s LG Energy Solution (LGES) has invested $15.97 million in Chinese firm Lopal Tech’s lithium iron phosphate (LFP) plant located in Indonesia. The deal grants LGES a 20% equity stake in PT LBM Energi Baru Indonesia, a third-tier subsidiary of Lopal.

The LFP facility, currently under Phase 1 development, aims to produce 30,000 tonnes per year of LFP cathode material. Phase 2 will triple that output to 90,000 tonnes. LGES’ funding is dedicated to Phase 1, aligning with its efforts to secure a diversified and stable supply of LFP materials.

LFP Demand Soars Amid EV Market Expansion

This strategic move reflects LGES’ growing interest in LFP chemistry, which is increasingly favored for affordable and long-range electric vehicles (EVs). In 2024, LGES also signed a long-term purchase agreement with Changzhou Liyuan, a Lopal subsidiary, for 160,000 tonnes of LFP cathode materials over five years.

The Indonesia-based facility enhances LGES’ global supply flexibility, enabling localized sourcing near key Southeast Asian and global markets. Moreover, Lopal’s credibility in the market has been reinforced by its five-year LFP supply contract with Ford, signed in January.

Regional Investment Strengthens Battery Industry Integration

LGES’ equity investment not only diversifies its raw material sourcing but also aligns with Indonesia’s ambitions to become a global battery manufacturing hub. The Southeast Asian nation has drawn increasing interest due to its abundant nickel and favorable investment policies.

This development highlights LGES’ proactive strategy in building a vertically integrated battery value chain to support global EV and energy storage system (ESS) markets.

China Titanium Sponge Exports Rise in March as Asian Buyers Support Demand

China Titanium Sponge

China titanium sponge exports rose year on year in March, supported by stronger buying interest from South Korea, India, Vietnam and Slovenia. Chinese customs data showed exports reached 453t during the month, up 8.6% from 417t a year earlier.

China titanium sponge exports still declined by 7.4% from February’s 489t, showing that overseas buying remained selective. Some buyers were not under immediate pressure to purchase Chinese material because spot supply was sufficient.

China titanium sponge exports totalled 1,535t in January-March, down 5.7% from a year earlier. The decline reflected weaker buying from major consumers including Japan, South Korea and the US.

The data show a titanium sponge export market that is recovering unevenly. Asian demand helped March shipments, but inventory drawdowns, delayed purchasing and weaker aerospace-linked orders continued to limit broader export momentum.

Japan, South Korea and US Demand Weaken in First Quarter

Japan remained the largest destination for Chinese titanium sponge in January-March, receiving 347t. However, shipments fell by 37% from 548t a year earlier.

The decline was mainly caused by delayed purchasing from a major Japanese consumer. Purchases are expected to resume in May, which could support later-quarter export flows.

South Korean imports from China also fell. Shipments dropped by 33% to 172t as some buyers slowed procurement after failing to secure downstream aerospace original equipment manufacturer orders.

This matters because aerospace demand remains one of the most important drivers of higher-grade titanium sponge consumption. When downstream aerospace orders are delayed, sponge buyers often reduce spot intake and work through inventories.

US demand was almost absent in the first quarter. China exported only 0.2t of titanium sponge to the US, down 99.8% from a year earlier, as US consumers continued drawing down inventories.

The US result highlights the effect of inventory cycles and trade uncertainty. Even when Chinese material remains available, buyers may delay purchases if they have sufficient stock or face qualification, tariff and policy risk.

Export Prices Track Higher Domestic Sponge Market

Chinese 99.7% grade titanium sponge export prices averaged $6.70/kg fob China in January-March. This was up 1.5% from $6.60/kg a year earlier.

The increase tracked higher domestic titanium sponge prices. Export pricing therefore reflected cost support in China rather than a broad surge in overseas demand.

The modest price rise also shows that the market remains balanced. Chinese suppliers have support from domestic costs, but overseas buyers are still cautious and selective.

For global titanium supply chains, the key issue is not only volume. The quality, qualification status and end-use requirements of sponge matter, especially for aerospace and high-performance industrial applications.

China’s titanium sponge exports remain important for regional buyers in Asia and Europe. However, demand from aerospace-linked customers will depend on downstream order visibility, inventory levels and qualification confidence.

If Japanese buying resumes in May and South Korean aerospace-related demand improves, Chinese exports could recover further. But weak US flows suggest that trade and inventory factors will continue to limit upside in some markets.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China titanium sponge exports show a market supported by regional buying but still constrained by aerospace order timing and inventory drawdowns. The next signal will come from whether Japanese and South Korean buyers return with stronger qualified-material demand in the second quarter.

Southeast Asia Aluminium Premiums Could Decouple From Japan on Chinese Semi Flows

Aluminium

Southeast Asia aluminium premiums could begin to decouple from Japan as Vietnamese buyers increasingly accept Chinese-origin semi-finished products for remelting. The shift suggests regional aluminium pricing may become more dependent on origin acceptance than on traditional Asian premium benchmarks.

Southeast Asia aluminium premiums are still supported for Western-origin and free-trade-agreement cargoes, with some deals above $300/t on a cif Thailand and Vietnam basis. However, cheaper Chinese semi-finished products are creating a parallel supply route.

Southeast Asia aluminium premiums may therefore face a different pricing path from Japan, where origin requirements and customer preferences can be more restrictive. Vietnam’s willingness to buy and remelt Chinese-origin material is changing the regional supply equation.

The key issue is whether low-priced Chinese semi exports remain available. If they do, southeast Asian buyers may have less reason to pay Japan-linked premiums for standard P1020 supply.

Chinese Semi-Finished Products Create a Remelting Alternative

Chinese semi-finished aluminium products are attracting stronger interest from Vietnamese and Korean buyers. Traders pointed to low-priced offers for products such as aluminium wires under HS code 76149000.

Offers for high-purity aluminium stranded wires were reported at between an $80/t discount and a $100/t premium to London Metal Exchange prices. That is below the more typical $50-100/t premium range seen in recent months.

The economics become competitive after remelting. With remelting costs estimated at $150-200/t, buyers can effectively convert wire into P1020-equivalent ingot at a total premium of about $200-300/t.

That is competitive against direct P1020 purchases, especially when standard ingot premiums remain elevated. For price-sensitive buyers, remelting offers a practical way to secure metal units while avoiding higher conventional premiums.

This does not mean all customers will accept the route. Some buyers still require Western-origin or free-trade-agreement cargoes because of compliance, quality, customer specification or trade-policy considerations.

But the presence of a cheaper remelting route can weaken the connection between southeast Asia and Japan premiums. If Vietnam accepts material that Japan will not, the two markets may price differently.

Export Rebates Could Decide Sustainability

China’s 13% export tax rebate for certain aluminium products is central to the pricing gap. Some Chinese suppliers can offer semi-finished products at very low premiums, or even discounts to LME, because the rebate supports export economics.

This creates a policy-driven arbitrage. Instead of exporting primary aluminium directly, suppliers can export semi-finished products that receive more favourable tax treatment.

The sustainability of the trend depends on Beijing’s response. If Chinese authorities decide export volumes are excessive or distortive, they could remove or adjust the rebate.

That would quickly change the economics. Without the rebate, low-priced Chinese semis may become less competitive as a remelting feedstock for southeast Asian buyers.

For now, the trade flow matters because western aluminium supply remains tight and regional premiums are elevated. Buyers are looking for workable alternatives, and Chinese semis provide one.

The broader market implication is clear. Aluminium premiums are becoming more segmented by origin, trade rules and customer acceptance. Regional benchmarks may no longer move together if buyers have different views on acceptable supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The possible split between southeast Asia and Japan premiums shows how trade policy can reshape aluminium pricing as much as physical supply. If Chinese semi exports remain cheap, Vietnam could become a more flexible remelting market while Japan stays tied to stricter origin premiums.

Australia–Japan critical minerals partnership targets secure supply chains

Critical Minerals

Australia–Japan critical minerals partnership moves to the forefront of bilateral ties. Australia–Japan critical minerals partnership builds on decades of energy cooperation. Australia–Japan critical minerals partnership seeks resilient, non-China supply for strategic industries.

From energy security to economic security

Australia and Japan will deepen cooperation on critical minerals. The focus shifts from LNG and coal to strategic metals. Penny Wong flagged economic security as the next stage of ties. Japan depends on stable inputs for EVs, magnets, and semiconductors. Australia offers scale, rule-of-law, and proximity to Asian markets.

Deals signal scope across rare earths and nickel

Existing projects anchor momentum for the Australia–Japan critical minerals partnership. Sojitz and Jogmec signed an A$200mn Lynas offtake in 2023. They agreed to buy 65% of Lynas’ heavy rare earth output. Sumitomo Metal Mining and Mitsubishi joined Ardea’s Kalgoorlie nickel project. The study outlines potential to reach 4mn t/yr of nickel. These deals pair Japanese capital with Australian resources and processing.

Strategic rationale and next steps

The partnership seeks resilient, transparent supply chains. It aligns with allied de-risking and industry policy goals. Therefore, both sides will likely back midstream processing in Australia. Meanwhile, long-term offtakes can underwrite project finance. Standardization and ESG traceability will strengthen market access. Early wins could include magnet-grade REO and battery-grade nickel.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Tokyo and Canberra are upgrading a proven model: Japanese investment plus Australian ore becomes strategic metals. The hinge now is midstream capacity and bankable offtakes; refining in Australia will test costs but de-risk geopolitics.

European Aluminium Calls for EU Scrap Export Limits

European Aluminium Scrap

Aluminium industry group urges EU action to protect regional scrap supply amid rising export demand and U.S. tariff pressure

Rising Exports and U.S. Tariffs Put Pressure on EU Scrap Supply

European Aluminium has urged the EU to implement export limits on aluminium scrap. This follows increased competition from Asian markets and new U.S. trade measures. In 2024, the EU exported 1.5mn tonnes of aluminium scrap, with over 500,000t going to India alone. Meanwhile, U.S. buyers are now expected to shift toward scrap after Washington imposed a 25% tariff on primary aluminium.

Industry Pushes for Regulation Through the WSR and Circular Economy Act

The association proposed using export fees and tightening the Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR). This 2023 revision now includes scrap metal, offering a legal pathway for restrictions. European Aluminium also called for a new Circular Economy Act to ensure long-term scrap availability and quality. Furthermore, it recommends a dedicated emissions benchmark for recyclers.

Scrap Now Central to Primary Production and Green Goals

Sustainability targets have pushed primary aluminium producers to use more scrap. Improved technologies also enable the use of lower-grade material. As a result, competition for European scrap has intensified. German trade body Aluminium Deutschland previously appealed to its government for similar EU-wide restrictions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Aluminium scrap is no longer a marginal byproduct—it’s become a strategic resource. With decarbonization and tariffs converging, Europe faces a policy choice: export profits or internal supply security. The latest moves by industry groups show momentum for regulatory intervention.

Global Refined Copper Market Surplus in the First Half of 2024

International Copper Study Group (ICSG)

Increased Output and Lagging Demand

The global refined copper market experienced a significant surplus in the first half of 2024, as supply continued to outpace demand. According to the International Copper Study Group (ICSG), the surplus reached 488,000 tons, a notable increase from the 115,000 tons recorded in the same period last year.

Global refined copper production rose by 6.2% to 13.9 million tons in the first half of the year. This increase was largely driven by expanded capacity in China and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which together account for about 53% of the world's refined copper production. Output in China grew by 7%, while the DRC's production increased by 12%, bolstered by the Kamoa-Kakula mine. In contrast, global refined copper consumption grew by only 3.4%, with weaker demand in the EU, Japan, and the US offset by gains in other Asian markets.

Production and Consumption Trends

Mined copper production also saw a rise, up by 3.1% to 11.1 million tons, driven by higher output in Chile, Indonesia, and the US. Chile, the leading producer, saw a 2.4% increase but remained below its five-year average. Indonesia experienced a dramatic 33% rise, recovering from previous constraints. Meanwhile, the Cobre Panama mine's production remained halted since November 2023.

In June, the global refined copper market produced 2.3 million tons and consumed 2.2 million tons, resulting in a monthly surplus of 95,000 tons.

European Aluminium Renews Call for Aluminium Scrap Export Restrictions

European Aluminium Scrap

US Tariff Hike Intensifies Scrap Supply Pressures in Europe

European Aluminium has renewed its push for export restrictions on aluminium scrap following US president Donald Trump’s decision to double tariffs on EU steel and aluminium imports to 50%. The association warns that the move could accelerate scrap outflows to the US, worsening an already tight supply situation in Europe.

The industry group first raised the proposal in 2018 when the US imposed a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminium imports. Scrap aluminium was excluded from the sanctions, making it an attractive alternative for US buyers seeking to avoid higher costs on primary aluminium. With the latest tariff hike, European Aluminium says the outflow has intensified, threatening domestic recycling and semi-fabrication operations.

Rising Global Demand for Aluminium Scrap Fuels Competition

Strong demand from buyers in India and other Asian markets has already strained European scrap supply. These buyers offer higher prices, benefiting from lower labour and energy costs and weaker environmental regulations. Additionally, primary aluminium producers in Europe are increasingly using higher-grade scrap to meet automotive customers’ sustainability goals.

European Aluminium reported that scrap exports to the US surged 273% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2025, already accounting for two-thirds of total exports in 2024. Without swift EU intervention, the association warns that the situation could escalate into a “full-blown scrap crisis,” jeopardizing the viability of Europe’s aluminium recycling and semi-fabrication industry.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The surge in US demand for European aluminium scrap highlights the vulnerability of supply chains to trade policy shifts. For the EU, balancing open trade with the need to safeguard strategic raw materials will be critical. Without targeted restrictions or incentives to retain scrap domestically, Europe risks undermining its own circular economy and low-carbon manufacturing goals.