US Tariffs Pressure Copper Prices and Curb China’s Scrap Imports

China Copper

US tariffs, introduced by President Donald Trump on April 2, have significantly impacted global copper prices. The tariffs, set at a minimum 10% tax on all foreign imports, have caused concerns about weakened copper demand, particularly from key industries that rely on copper, such as automobiles and home appliances. China’s copper scrap imports are also under pressure due to retaliatory tariffs, which will be implemented by China on April 10.

Impact of Tariffs on Copper Prices

Following the announcement of tariffs, copper prices saw a dramatic decline. As of April 7, London Metal Exchange (LME) three-month copper prices fell to a one-year low of $8,105 per ton, a significant drop from $9,721 per ton on April 2. Similarly, Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) prices also plummeted to a three-month low of 73,640 yuan per ton from 79,890 yuan per ton during the same period.

Although copper itself is not directly affected by the new tariffs, the downstream sectors, such as automotive manufacturing and home appliances, face substantial tariffs. This will likely depress demand for copper, as these industries represent significant end-users of copper products.

US Tariffs on Cars and Appliances Affect Copper Demand

A 25% tariff on imported cars and trucks came into effect on April 3, with a further 25% tax on auto parts set to follow in May. The US light vehicle market saw significant growth in 2024, with sales climbing to 16.8 million units. Similarly, the US imported $23.5 billion worth of home appliances from China in 2024. These appliances, including cooling devices and electronics, represented 23% of global copper demand in 2023. The imposition of tariffs on these goods will likely lead to a reduction in copper demand from the US.

On a positive note, lower copper prices may drive copper fabricators to restock in the short term, especially after a significant price drop in late March. Data from the SHFE shows that copper stocks fell from 256,328 tons on March 21 to 225,736 tons by April 3, as downstream buyers rushed to purchase copper cathode in response to falling prices.

China’s Retaliatory Tariffs and Copper Scrap Imports

China’s planned tariffs on US copper scrap, set to take effect on April 10, will impact copper supply in the country. In 2024, China imported over 440,000 tons of copper scrap from the US, accounting for nearly 20% of its total copper scrap imports. However, market participants predict that some traders will attempt to bypass the tariffs by sourcing US-origin copper scrap from other countries.

In February, US copper scrap exports fell by 10% compared to the previous year, with China seeing the largest drop in imports. This decrease in exports can be attributed to tariff expectations, which have made it difficult for US exporters to remain competitive. The large spread between CME and LME prices has further strained export options, leaving US dealers with excess scrap volumes.

Limited Impact on Copper Concentrate and Cathode Supplies

China’s retaliatory tariffs are expected to have a minimal impact on its domestic copper concentrate and cathode supply. In 2024, China imported just 460,000 tons of copper concentrate and 1,575 tons of copper cathode from the US, representing only a small fraction of its total imports. Therefore, the retaliatory tariffs are unlikely to cause significant disruptions to these supply chains.

Japan and South Korea Prepare for Economic Impact of US Metal Tariffs

Japan Manufacturing

Japan Takes a Cautious Approach, While South Korea Moves Quickly to Shield Its Automotive Industry

The imposition of US tariffs on metal products has left Japanese and South Korean industries scrambling to mitigate potential damages. Following US President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs, Japan’s metal firms are proceeding with caution. Tokyo is currently working on a strategy to strike a middle ground while preparing for any potential long-term effects. South Korea, on the other hand, has moved quickly to put measures in place to support its automotive industry, which stands to be significantly impacted by the tariffs.

Japan's Response to US Tariffs

In 2024, Japanese exports of machinery and electrical equipment to the US amounted to ¥7.8 trillion ($53 billion), reflecting a 5.3% increase from the previous year. Despite this growth, Japan's metal industry is not experiencing significant immediate impact from the new 24% tariffs imposed on steel and automobile products. However, companies are still closely monitoring the situation to understand the full extent of the potential damages. While some industry leaders remain uncertain, one Tokyo-based battery material producer noted that no damage had been reported yet from clients. Still, Japanese authorities are wary of long-term effects, especially in sectors like electronics and automotive, which would face major setbacks should the tariffs persist.

The Japanese government is refraining from retaliatory measures as negotiations with the US government continue. Japan hopes to reach an agreement that could either reduce the tariffs or potentially exempt the country from them entirely. On April 8, Japan’s Ministry of Trade and Industry (METI) will hold a ministerial meeting to discuss comprehensive measures in response to the tariffs.

South Korea Takes Swift Action to Support Its Economy

South Korea, with a more direct approach, is preparing to unveil measures aimed at mitigating the negative effects on its automotive sector. In 2024, South Korea exported $127.8 billion in goods to the US, including nearly $34.7 billion worth of passenger automobiles, $7 billion in auto parts, and nearly $3 billion in lithium-ion batteries. With such significant exports to the US, the potential impact of these tariffs could be severe.

The South Korean government, led by acting president Han Duck-soo, has vowed to work with the private sector to minimize damage. The government is planning follow-up measures to protect vulnerable sectors, such as small-medium enterprises and mid-sized companies. However, the country’s political instability, with the impeachment of former president Yoon Suk Yeol, may delay the response. South Korea’s aluminium sector is also on high alert, with companies looking to devise strategies to weather the storm.

Additionally, South Korean tech giant LG Electronics has warned that any further escalation in tariffs could have a pronounced impact on its operations, especially if the US introduces import quotas or safeguard measures. The company’s major production sites are spread across South Korea, China, Mexico, and Vietnam. LG's CFO, Changtae Kim, emphasized that higher tariffs would directly affect the company’s competitive position.

Looking Ahead

Both Japan and South Korea face uncertain futures as they navigate the complex landscape of US tariffs. Japan remains cautious, hoping for negotiations to alleviate the pressure, while South Korea moves swiftly to protect key sectors like automotive manufacturing. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining how both nations adapt to the evolving trade situation and whether their efforts to shield their industries from the tariffs will be successful.

US New Tariffs Could Disrupt China's Non-Exempt Metals Exports

China Tariffs

New tariffs on lithium, rare earth magnets, and more could affect China's metal exports to the US.

The United States has announced significant new tariffs on Chinese imports, with a notable focus on metals. While many non-ferrous metals and ferro-alloys have been exempted, some crucial exports from China, like lithium, rare earth magnets, and lithium-ion batteries, will face substantial increases in tariff rates. These changes are set to have a lasting impact on the trade between the US and China, especially in the energy storage and electric vehicle (EV) sectors.

High Tariffs on Lithium-Ion Batteries and Energy Storage

As of April 9, the US will implement an 82.4% tariff on electric vehicle (EV) power batteries and a 57.4% tariff on non-EV lithium-ion batteries from China. This substantial hike in tariffs will make Chinese-made batteries far more expensive and may eliminate the possibility of Chinese EV power batteries entering the US market. US consumers will likely absorb these costs, potentially leading to inflation in the US battery industry, especially in the energy storage sector.

China’s lithium-ion battery exports to the US had already been on the rise, with a 59% increase in exports during the first two months of the year. However, these new tariffs are expected to curb the growth of China's battery exports to the US and negatively affect lithium feedstock prices, which are currently at a four-year low.

Impact on Rare Earth Magnets

Rare earth magnets are another key area of concern, as these products were not exempted from the new tariffs. Despite some uncertainty about the exact tariff implementation, producers in China are anxious about the potential 54% tariff on rare earth magnets. China remains the dominant supplier of rare earth magnets globally, and while the US does have some alternatives, they are mostly focused on military applications with significantly higher prices. This makes it unlikely that the US can fully escape its dependence on China, especially for civilian applications.

China’s exports of rare earth magnets to the US in 2022 accounted for 12% of its total exports, and while tariffs could reduce this figure, China’s competitive pricing in the civil sector ensures its continued dominance in the global market.

Copper, Aluminium, and Hafnium: Other Affected Metals

While copper and aluminium are exempt from this latest round of tariffs, the copper industry remains on edge. US authorities are investigating the potential security implications of copper imports, and there’s speculation that a tariff may be imposed in the future. As for aluminium, Chinese exports are already subject to a steep 70% tariff, which is expected to discourage further aluminium exports to the US, pushing Chinese suppliers to seek alternative markets.

Hafnium, a critical metal used in aerospace applications, will also face a significant tariff hike, moving from 34% to 79%. This change could prompt US buyers to source hafnium from other regions, like Rotterdam, where the tariff is considerably lower.

Conclusion

The new US tariffs on Chinese metals exports are set to reshape the global metals market, particularly for lithium-ion batteries, rare earth magnets, and hafnium. While some sectors, like copper and aluminium, may have avoided immediate tariff hikes, long-term implications for the industry remain uncertain. The tariff increase on key metal exports from China to the US is expected to alter supply chains and increase costs for US consumers, especially in the EV and energy storage markets.

US tariffs hit Embraer profits as deliveries rise

Embraer

US tariffs hit Embraer profits in the third quarter, even as aircraft deliveries increased. The US tariffs hit Embraer profits by raising parts and components costs across executive aviation and services. As a result, US tariffs hit Embraer profits and forced the Brazilian aircraft manufacturer to absorb extra costs while still investing in growth.

Tariff shock squeezes Embraer’s margins

Embraer reported that US tariffs cost the company $17mn in the third quarter. Most of the hit came from executive aviation, where higher prices for imported parts reduced profitability. Service and support activities also absorbed around $2mn in extra tariff-related costs.

However, the company still delivered 5pc more aircraft than a year earlier. This delivery growth shows robust demand for Embraer jets despite macro headwinds. Even so, net profit fell sharply to $54.4mn, down 75pc year on year and 54pc quarter on quarter. The profit squeeze highlights how quickly tariffs can erode margins in capital-intensive aerospace manufacturing.

The US imposed 50pc tariffs on Brazilian goods in July, directly affecting Embraer’s cost base. Management already signalled during the second-quarter call that tariffs would hit results. Now investors can clearly see the impact in Embraer’s third-quarter numbers.

Negotiations, strategy and electric aircraft investment

Embraer expects tariff pressure to ease if Brazil and the US reach a political agreement. The company pointed to the October meeting between presidents Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Donald Trump in Kuala Lumpur as an important milestone. Both leaders plan further talks focused on rolling back the extra duties on Brazilian exports.

Meanwhile, Embraer continues to invest in core programmes and future platforms. The group spent $98.6mn on operations and research projects in the quarter, only slightly below last year’s level. Its electric aircraft subsidiary Eve increased investment to $54.8mn, nearly doubling spending to advance urban air mobility solutions.

This strategic focus suggests Embraer will not let short-term tariff shocks derail long-term innovation. However, the company must carefully manage cash flows as it balances R&D, portfolio growth and the drag from higher US import costs. The outcome of US-Brazil negotiations will be critical for earnings visibility over the next few years.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Embraer case underlines how quickly trade policy shifts can hit advanced manufacturing, even when end-market demand remains healthy. For aerospace suppliers and metals producers alike, US-Brazil tariff decisions will help determine future sourcing patterns for high-value components and alloy-intensive structures. Investors should watch both diplomatic progress and Embraer’s ability to pass through costs or re-engineer its supply chains.

Trump's Abrupt Tariff Decision: Pausing Global Levies While Increasing China's Tariffs

China Tariff

In a surprising shift, President Donald Trump announced that he would pause the punitive tariffs on key US trading partners, which were set to begin today. However, he simultaneously raised tariffs on Chinese imports to an extraordinary 125%. This move marks a significant reversal from earlier statements, as Trump justified the pause with the recent volatility in financial markets, particularly in the stock and bond markets.

Pausing Global Tariffs but Targeting China

Trump’s decision, announced via social media, paused reciprocal tariffs on nearly every country except China. These tariffs, which had ranged from 17% on countries like the Philippines and Israel to 49% on Cambodia, were set to begin today. The pause will last for 90 days, offering a temporary respite to US trading partners.

However, the increased tariffs on Chinese imports stand in stark contrast. According to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the tariff rate on China will rise to an unprecedented 125%. This escalation follows ongoing trade tensions between the US and China, with China repeatedly increasing its trade actions against the US.

The EU, which would have faced a 20% tariff starting today, has already prepared retaliatory measures. The European Union has also proposed countermeasures for the 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports imposed earlier by the US.

Flexibility in Tariff Policy and Trade Negotiations

In a shift from earlier policy, President Trump indicated a willingness to consider exemptions for certain US importers who may be disproportionately affected by the tariffs. This move contrasts with previous statements where the administration had insisted on a blanket approach. Energy commodities and critical minerals were exempt from both the baseline 10% tariff and the higher reciprocal tariffs.

Furthermore, Bessent suggested that trade discussions may also involve non-trade issues, with the US considering a major LNG project in Alaska that could attract interest from South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. These potential deals could factor into negotiations aimed at reducing the US trade deficit with these countries.

China’s Response and Global Impact

China, predictably, responded to the new tariffs with its own retaliatory measures. As of April 10, China will increase import tariffs on US goods by 50 percentage points, reaching a total of 84%. This escalation underscores the growing trade conflict between the two largest economies in the world.

The UK and Canada have also indicated potential countermeasures. The UK, which remains subject to a 10% tariff, has included refined oil products from the US in a list of goods that could be targeted. Mexico and Canada, however, were excluded from the latest round of tariffs, further highlighting the complex nature of US trade policies.

Uncertainty Surrounds Tariff Strategy

The sudden reversal in tariff policy caught many in the administration by surprise. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who had been testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee, was blindsided by the announcement. This left many questioning the coherence and strategy behind Trump’s tariff decisions.

Representative Steven Horsford of Nevada remarked that there appeared to be no clear strategy, as evidenced by Greer’s reaction. This further compounded the sense of unpredictability surrounding US trade policy.

Conclusion: A Shifting Trade Landscape

President Trump's abrupt changes to tariff policies, particularly the increase in tariffs on China, signal that the US is deepening its trade conflict with the country. While the temporary pause on global tariffs provides some relief to US allies, the continued escalation with China may have long-lasting effects on global trade dynamics. As negotiations unfold, businesses worldwide will be watching closely to understand the full impact of these decisions.

EU Prepares Countermeasures Against U.S. Import Tariffs

U.S. Tariffs

The European Union is finalizing a series of countermeasures in response to the U.S.'s decision to impose a 20% tariff on imports, effective April 9. These tariffs are in addition to the existing duties on various goods, particularly steel and aluminum, which have already been heavily impacted by U.S. trade policies. The European Commission is working on a first set of responses, and further actions may be introduced depending on how the tariffs affect EU industries.

EU's Strong Stance Against U.S. Tariffs

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the EU's firm position on combating what it perceives as unfair trade practices. Von der Leyen stated that Europe will not accept "dumping" in its markets, referring to the practice of selling products at artificially low prices. The EU’s commitment to protecting its markets from global overcapacity remains a key aspect of its response. Von der Leyen also expressed disappointment, noting that many Europeans feel let down by their “oldest ally” – a reference to the U.S.

Impact on Non-Ferrous Metals, Energy, and Minerals

The U.S. tariffs, set to begin on April 9, will apply to most foreign imports, with some key exceptions. Energy products, as well as various minerals, including non-ferrous metals, are exempt from the new tariffs. Additionally, oil products, base oils, coal, and some fertilizers and chemicals will not be subject to the new duties. However, the tariff will still target steel, aluminum, and automobiles, industries that have already been under the strain of separate, earlier tariffs.

A Changing Global Trade Landscape

These tariffs are expected to have significant effects on global trade, particularly in sectors that rely heavily on international imports and exports. With many European industries vulnerable to the impact of these tariffs, the EU is preparing to take action to mitigate any economic fallout. The bloc is closely monitoring indirect effects, which could involve shifts in trade patterns and increased pressure on affected sectors.

Conclusion: Europe's Preparedness in a Trade Conflict

As the EU finalizes its countermeasures, the bloc is determined to protect its markets and industries from the negative effects of U.S. tariffs. Although the initial measures focus on steel and aluminum, the broader scope of U.S. tariff policies could continue to challenge global trade dynamics. The EU’s response will likely shape future trade relations between Europe and the U.S. in the coming months.

Metal Craft US Expansion Shows How Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Are Reshaping Manufacturing

Metal Craft Spinning and Stamping

Metal Craft US expansion shows how US metal tariffs are changing cross-border manufacturing decisions. The Ontario-based fabricator plans to invest $1.3mn in a new plant in Niagara Falls, New York. The move is meant to reduce the cost pressure created by US steel and aluminum tariffs. As a result, Metal Craft US expansion reflects a wider industrial response to rising trade barriers.

The project includes renovations, machining equipment, and installation at a 25,000ft² industrial site. It is also expected to create 17 jobs. That makes the investment modest in size but important in meaning. Therefore, Metal Craft US expansion is less about scale and more about strategic positioning inside the US market.

The business logic is straightforward. Nearly three-quarters of Metal Craft’s customer base is in the United States. Serving those customers from inside the US can reduce tariff exposure and improve commercial flexibility. Consequently, US metal tariffs are influencing plant location decisions as much as product pricing.

US Metal Tariffs Are Pushing Manufacturers Toward Local Production

US metal tariffs are pushing foreign manufacturers to rethink how they serve the American market. President Donald Trump’s 50pc tariffs on steel and aluminum have raised the cost of cross-border supply for many producers. That pressure is especially strong for firms with heavy US sales exposure. As a result, some companies now see US production as a defensive necessity.

This shift matters because it changes investment patterns, not just trade flows. Instead of paying higher tariff costs, manufacturers may move part of their operations into the United States. That can protect customer relationships and preserve margins. Therefore, steel and aluminum tariffs are starting to reshape manufacturing geography in North America.

Cross-Border Manufacturing Now Faces a Higher Strategic Cost

Cross-border manufacturing has become harder to justify when tariff pressure stays high. Metal Craft fabricates products for roofing, construction equipment, furniture, and other industrial uses. These are practical end markets where cost competitiveness and delivery reliability matter. Meanwhile, tariff friction can quickly weaken both.

The broader implication is clear. Companies that rely heavily on US customers may now favor US-based processing, fabrication, or finishing capacity. That does not mean cross-border trade will disappear. However, it does mean the cost of staying outside the US has increased materially. Consequently, Metal Craft US expansion may become part of a wider trend among foreign metal fabricators.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This investment matters because it shows tariffs are doing more than raising prices. They are influencing where companies place real industrial assets. If tariff policy stays firm, more fabricators may choose local US production over cross-border exposure.

Brazil’s $5.5bn decree to counter US tariffs

Brazil, US tariffs

Brazil’s $5.5bn decree to counter US tariffs targets small firms and perishables. The plan directs cheap credit, market access, and procurement to cushion trade shocks. As a result, Brazil’s $5.5bn decree to counter US tariffs supports diversification and liquidity. Therefore, policymakers frame Brazil’s $5.5bn decree to counter US tariffs as the first step in a wider response.

Emergency credit and procurement push

The decree launches concessional credit for businesses hit by the 50% US import tariffs. It prioritizes small producers of perishable goods facing immediate cash-flow stress. Moreover, expanded federal purchasing will absorb displaced volumes and stabilize domestic prices.

Diversification and trade strategy

Brazil will fund export promotion to redirect goods toward Latin America, Europe, and Asia. Meanwhile, the government plans new investment tools to upgrade logistics and compliance. In parallel, officials will challenge the tariffs at the WTO to protect market access.

Brazil argues the tariffs are politically motivated rather than economic. However, the package treats them as a structural risk to exporters. Consequently, Brasília couples short-term relief with medium-term market development.

The cancelled ministerial meeting underscores strained US-Brazil ties. Nevertheless, Brazil signals readiness to negotiate while building internal buffers. Over time, stronger financing and procurement can reduce tariff exposure.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This decree buys time for small exporters while Brazil hunts new buyers. Expect near-term support for perishables and SMEs, plus stronger trade-finance demand. The decisive test will be speed of disbursement and success in opening alternative markets.

Titanium Exempted from US Tariffs: Aerospace Industry Impact Remains Unclear

Titanium

New US Tariff Exemptions for Titanium Could Affect the Aerospace Supply Chain

On April 2, 2025, US President Donald Trump announced new tariffs on several foreign imports, including an exemption for titanium, titanium scrap, and ferro-titanium. While the exemption helps protect titanium trade, the broader implications for the aerospace industry remain uncertain.

Titanium Exemption and Its Effects

The US tariffs announced include a list of exemptions, with titanium in its various forms being spared. However, other metals like hafnium, molybdenum, vanadium, nickel scrap, and aluminum scrap were not exempted. The new tariff scheme does not affect pre-existing duties on Chinese titanium products, including a 20% duty on titanium products from China, which has been in place since March 4, 2025. Despite the exemption for certain forms of titanium, Chinese titanium sponge imports will still be subject to a 60% duty, which remains unchanged.

Additionally, imports of unwrought titanium from Japan, Kazakhstan, and Saudi Arabia will still face a 15% tariff, though efforts to remove this tariff for sponge imports are underway. For US titanium scrap imports, particularly from the EU and UK, which make up over half of the US intake, the tariff exemption is crucial. Without it, US scrap dealers, processors, and consumers would face substantial challenges, as the US does not produce enough vacuum-grade titanium scrap domestically to meet demand.

Aerospace Industry and Supply Chain Impact

While the titanium exemption provides relief for many manufacturers, the broader impact of the tariffs on the aerospace industry is still unclear. Aerospace manufacturers are uncertain about the tariff's effects on finished parts, components, and engines, particularly regarding supply chains that involve cross-border production of engine parts like the Leap-1A and Leap-1B engines for the A320neo and Boeing 737 Max.

Canada and Mexico were excluded from the new US tariffs, alleviating concerns for companies like Bombardier, Airbus, RTX, and Heroux-Devtek, which operate in those regions. Still, some titanium producers believe the situation could change rapidly, as it is difficult to define the boundaries between parts made from titanium and assembled components that use other materials, such as nickel-based alloys or aluminum.

China’s 34% Tariff on US Exports

In response to US tariffs, China has imposed a 34% tariff on all US imports, which will affect titanium imports from the US. Despite importing limited amounts of titanium from the US, China still relies on US imports for critical aerospace components, including parts for its C919 aircraft. The C919 uses the CFM Leap-1C engine, which is assembled in both the US and France.

New US Tariffs Could Significantly Impact European Aluminium Scrap Exports

Aluminium Scrap

European aluminium recycling faces challenges as US tariffs on scrap imports rise.

The recent announcement of new tariffs by the United States government, particularly on aluminium scrap from Europe, is sending ripples through the European aluminium recycling industry. The sweeping tariff adjustments, which were introduced by US President Donald Trump on April 2, threaten to significantly reduce the flow of European aluminium scrap to the US. With these new measures, aluminium scrap will face a substantial tariff, making it less attractive for US buyers.

Impact of New Tariffs on Aluminium Scrap Exports

The new tariffs, set to take effect on April 9, place aluminium scrap imports from Europe under a 20% tariff, while imports from the UK will face a slightly lower 10% tariff. This comes after the previously established 25% tariff on primary aluminium imports from Europe, which was put in place last month. As a result, the cost of importing aluminium scrap from Europe will be nearly as high as that for importing primary aluminium, significantly altering the economics of aluminium recycling.

Historically, the US had been a major buyer of European aluminium scrap, with many industries using recycled aluminium as an alternative to primary aluminium. The new tariffs, however, will likely make scrap imports much less appealing to US buyers, pushing them to explore other options. This comes after previous expectations that the US would turn to aluminium scrap as a more affordable alternative to primary aluminium, which is now burdened by hefty tariffs.

Reactions from Industry Associations

Industry associations such as European Aluminium and Aluminium Deutschland have voiced concerns over the new tariffs, as they undermine the viability of aluminium scrap exports. These associations had earlier called for export restrictions on scrap due to fears that large-scale shipments of aluminium scrap could exacerbate market imbalances. With the tariffs in place, the likelihood of scrap exports to the US is expected to diminish significantly.

European Aluminium has indicated that it is closely monitoring the situation to determine its next steps regarding export restrictions. Aluminium Deutschland, however, has yet to comment on the matter.

What This Means for the Aluminium Recycling Industry

These new tariffs could lead to a shift in the global aluminium market. If European aluminium scrap becomes less competitive due to high tariffs, it may force US buyers to seek out other sources of aluminium scrap, possibly from domestic markets or alternative suppliers. Additionally, this could put pressure on European recyclers, who may face reduced demand for their products, forcing them to explore new markets or adjust their pricing strategies.

As the situation evolves, the aluminium recycling industry in Europe will need to adapt to these new challenges, either by lobbying for changes in tariff policies or by finding ways to remain competitive in an increasingly restricted global market.

EU-US Trade Agreement Moves Toward Approval as Steel and Aluminium Tariff Risks Remain

Steelmaking

EU-US trade agreement approval moved closer after the European Parliament’s trade committee backed legislation to implement the deal reached last July. The committee voted 29-9 with one abstention, signalling a clear majority before the expected plenary vote on 26 March.

The EU-US trade agreement is designed to provide stability in transatlantic trade after years of tariff pressure, industrial disputes, and geopolitical tension. However, the committee’s position shows that Europe wants stronger safeguards before implementation becomes final.

The EU-US trade agreement remains especially important for metals-intensive sectors. Steel, aluminium, machinery, automotive components, and industrial equipment all sit directly inside the tariff debate.

Parliament Seeks Safeguards Against New US Tariffs

The trade committee wants a suspension clause if the US imposes new tariffs on EU states. It also wants implementation to depend on US compliance with the agreement and stronger protection against steel import pressure.

German lawmaker Bernd Lange said the legislation aims to provide stability, but he warned that tariffs imposed on the EU or individual member states over foreign policy decisions would be unacceptable. His comments reflect European concern that trade policy could again become linked to wider political disputes.

The committee’s position also targets the treatment of EU products containing steel or aluminium. Lange called on the US to reduce tariffs on EU products containing less than 50pc steel or aluminium from 50pc to 15pc before the EU completes implementation.

Steel and Aluminium Remain Central to Transatlantic Trade Tensions

Section 232 tariffs remain the key industrial issue. Lange warned that if Section 232 tariffs rise from 10pc to 15pc, many EU products could face effective duties above the 15pc ceiling once most favoured nation tariffs are added.

That risk matters because many manufactured goods contain embedded steel or aluminium. Higher effective tariffs could hit machinery, automotive parts, appliances, industrial components, and downstream manufacturing supply chains.

The committee’s backing still suggests broad support for the deal. Swedish lawmaker Jorgen Warborn said the EU should uphold its commitments, while also calling for safeguards against new US tariffs. That position captures the political balance: Europe wants the stability of the agreement, but not at the cost of accepting future unilateral tariff measures.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU-US trade agreement may reduce uncertainty, but metals remain the stress test for transatlantic trade. Steel and aluminium tariffs are no longer narrow trade tools; they are industrial policy instruments that shape competitiveness across entire manufacturing chains.

Japan's Response to U.S. Tariffs: Reluctance to Retaliate Amid Economic Concerns

Japan, U.S. Tariffs

The Japanese government has expressed disappointment over the U.S.'s recent decision to impose a 24% tariff on Japanese imports. However, despite this setback, Japan appears unlikely to take retaliatory measures against the U.S., citing concerns about the potential negative consequences for its national security and economy.

Japan's Diplomatic Stance on U.S. Tariffs

Japanese Minister for Trade and Industry, Yoji Muto, conveyed the country's frustration with the U.S. tariff decision, stating that it was "regrettable" despite Japan's request to be excluded from the measure. However, Muto indicated that retaliatory tariffs might not serve Japan's best interests, leaving the door open for diplomatic negotiations instead. Japan’s reluctance to retaliate likely stems from the nation’s reliance on the U.S. for national defense, given the significant role of the U.S. military in Japan's security arrangements.

Focus on Domestic Support Rather Than Retaliation

In response to the new tariffs, Japan is prioritizing support for its domestic industries over direct retaliation. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba promised financial assistance for affected sectors to mitigate the economic impact of the tariffs. The Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry has also formed a task force to explore other potential measures to support industries, particularly in sectors hit hardest by the tariffs.

Impact on Japan’s Automotive Industry

The U.S. tariff decision comes at a time when Japan's automotive industry is poised to feel the brunt of additional trade barriers. On April 3, the U.S. is expected to impose a 25% tariff on automobile imports, a measure that would significantly affect Japan’s top export industry. In 2024, Japan exported approximately 1.3 million vehicles to the U.S., with the U.S. accounting for over one-third of Japan’s total passenger car exports.

Japan's Path Forward: Economic Resilience and Diplomacy

Although Japan has refrained from retaliating, the country is clearly focused on cushioning its industries from the blow of new tariffs. With automobile exports under threat and broader economic uncertainties ahead, Japan will likely continue to emphasize diplomatic avenues and domestic support mechanisms to safeguard its economic interests.

US Tariffs May Spur Argentina Lithium Salts Production

US Tariffs

Tariff Exemptions Favor Lithium Raw Materials, Not Finished Batteries

The US has exempted lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide from its newly announced tariffs, creating a possible boon for Argentina's lithium sector. While raw lithium salts escape extra duties, finished battery imports face steep tariffs: 64.9% for China, 24% for Japan, and 25% for South Korea.

This disparity aligns with US efforts to localize battery manufacturing, a movement accelerated by the Inflation Reduction Act under President Biden. With at least 10 new battery factories coming online in the US this year, the demand for lithium raw materials is surging.

Argentina’s Brine Lithium May Fill the US Supply Gap

The US faces a bottleneck in domestic lithium production and processing. Currently, Albemarle’s Silver Peak mine is the only active operation, producing just 5,000t/yr of technical-grade lithium carbonate, which lacks the purity needed for EV batteries.

As a result, the US will increasingly depend on lithium imports, especially battery-grade salts. Argentina, with its low-cost brine operations, may become a preferred supplier if its projects can consistently meet battery-grade specifications.

Brine operations, while slower to ramp up than hard-rock mining, are cheaper to operate and typically more cost-competitive over time. Argentina also offers a low 3% royalty tax, compared to Chile's 40% ceiling, enhancing its competitiveness.

Global Lithium Supply Chains May Shift Toward South America

Countries like Australia and Brazil, which mine spodumene, rely heavily on China for conversion, placing them in a higher tariff category. These spodumene-dependent nations now face at least 20% US tariffs due to their reliance on Chinese refining infrastructure.

Meanwhile, Argentina’s direct-to-battery-grade production strategy may give it an edge.

“All of Argentina’s lithium projects go to battery grade,” said Daniel Gonzalez, Argentina’s vice-minister of energy and mining.

If Argentina proves its capability at scale, the country could secure a dominant role in North America's clean energy transition, especially as the US reorients trade relationships in critical minerals.

The Metalnomist Commentary

With tariffs redrawing global battery supply lines, Argentina’s brine-based lithium sector is now a strategic wildcard. If proven at scale, it could shift market share away from spodumene producers tied to China—and bring Latin America deeper into the heart of US industrial planning.

Mexico's Auto Industry Struggles with US Tariffs Despite USMCA Exemption

Mexico Car Tariffs

Despite the recent decision by US President Donald Trump to pause reciprocal tariffs on several nations, Mexico's automotive industry continues to face significant challenges. The 25% tariffs on exports of automobiles, steel, and aluminum, announced last month, remain in place. These tariffs, coupled with Trump's global 25% tariff on auto imports, continue to impact Mexican carmakers.

USMCA Exemption Still Leaves Uncertainty

Mexico and Canada do benefit from an exemption in the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) for imports that comply with regional content rules. However, the specifics of how this exemption will be implemented remain unclear. Mexico is still in negotiations with the US to eliminate or reduce the tariffs in certain cases.

Gabriel Padilla, head of the Mexican auto parts association INA, explained that their primary focus is to extend the tariff application to auto parts covered by the USMCA. He stressed the importance of demonstrating the integration levels by component grade to show what is beneficial for both countries. According to a recent INA study, the US’s 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum could cost auto parts companies $2.94 billion more in additional costs.

Negotiations and Uncertainty Continue

Despite ongoing negotiations, the uncertainty surrounding the tariffs is causing some companies to pause exports while awaiting clarity. Rogelio Garza, president of the Mexican automaker association AMIA, mentioned that some companies are hesitant to continue shipments until the impact of the tariffs becomes clearer. He expects more concrete definitions regarding the auto tariffs within the next two months.

Garza also pointed out that the paused shipments contributed to a 6% decline in Mexican auto exports to the US in the first quarter, as reported by the national statistics agency Inegi. The total exports fell to 775,886 units, down from the previous year's figures.

Conclusion: A Time of Adjustment for Mexico’s Automotive Sector

The automotive industry in Mexico faces a period of uncertainty as it continues to navigate the effects of US tariffs. While the USMCA exemption provides some relief, the lack of clarity on its implementation and ongoing negotiations leave many carmakers in a state of flux. The situation is further complicated by the high costs imposed by the tariffs on steel, aluminum, and auto parts. As negotiations unfold, the next couple of months will be critical for determining the future of the Mexican automotive sector.

Blanket US Aluminium Tariffs to Have Limited Impact on European Trade Flows

US Aluminium

Trump's 25% Tariff on All Aluminium Imports Will Affect US Consumers, Not European Markets

US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a blanket 25% tariff on all aluminium imports is expected to have minimal impact on European trade flows. This contrasts with earlier plans to impose tariffs specifically on imports from Canada and Mexico. According to market participants, the new approach is unlikely to disrupt European markets as much as the previous strategy might have.

Impact of Blanket Tariffs on Aluminium Trade

Trump’s new tariffs, which will apply to all aluminium imports, are set to be announced soon. This blanket tariff on steel and aluminium is expected to affect all exporting countries without distinguishing between suppliers. Canada, the UAE, and Argentina were the leading exporters of unwrought aluminium to the US last year, but the tariffs will now apply to everyone, making it difficult for countries like Canada to redirect excess supplies to Europe as initially anticipated.

Under the previous plan, markets predicted a shift in trade flows, with more Canadian aluminium potentially moving to Europe. This was expected to reduce European premiums due to an increase in supply, as demand in Europe remained weak. However, under the new tariff strategy, this shift is likely to be less pronounced. The global competitiveness of Canadian aluminium is diminished when tariffs apply universally, making aluminium from other regions, such as the Middle East and South America, less attractive in the US market.

Consequences for US Consumers and Domestic Production

The main consequence of these blanket tariffs will be higher costs for US consumers. While the tariffs could potentially drive up domestic production, increasing capacity will take years. In the meantime, US buyers will face higher prices for aluminium imports, particularly from Canada, as shipping times from these suppliers are shorter than those from more distant countries.

Market analysts believe that, despite the tariffs, US consumers will continue to import from Canada because of these logistical advantages. The blanket tariff strategy is unlikely to redirect a significant volume of Canadian aluminium to Europe, meaning the overall impact on European aluminium flows will be minimal.

Conclusion: A Shift in Costs, Not Trade Flows

In conclusion, Trump’s blanket tariffs on aluminium imports are expected to result in higher costs for US consumers but will have limited consequences for European trade flows. The market will likely experience some adjustments, but European aluminium premiums are not expected to drop significantly as a result of these changes.

China Files WTO Case Against US Tariffs

Beijing Challenges US 10% Tariffs on Chinese Goods, Accusing Washington of Trade Protectionism

On February 5, 2025, China filed a case with the World Trade Organization (WTO) challenging the United States' additional 10% tariffs on all Chinese goods. This move follows the implementation of the tariffs on February 4, 2025, as announced by the US government under President Donald Trump’s administration. The case was officially circulated to WTO members on the same day, as confirmed by the WTO.

A Growing Trade Dispute: China’s Strong Response to US Tariffs

The US’s blanket 10% tariffs on Chinese imports add to the previous tariffs imposed during both Trump’s and former President Joe Biden’s terms. This action has intensified the trade tension between the two global powers, with China strongly criticizing the move. China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a statement describing the tariffs as a serious violation of WTO rules and an example of “unilateralism and trade protectionism.” It further claimed that these tariffs undermine the multilateral trading system and disrupt the stability of global industrial and supply chains.

In retaliation, China imposed its own set of tariffs on a range of US goods, including crude oil, coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG), thermal and coking coal, as well as large displacement vehicles and pick-up trucks. Additionally, China has expanded its export controls to include more critical minerals, further escalating the trade conflict.

Geopolitical Tensions and the WTO's Role

This WTO case is part of the broader geopolitical tensions between China and the Western world, which have been steadily increasing in recent years. While the WTO offers a platform for dispute resolution, some industry participants are uncertain about the case’s potential success, especially given Trump’s past threats to withdraw from the WTO, as well as his withdrawal from other international agreements such as the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization (WHO).

In August 2024, China also filed a case against the European Union (EU) for imposing provisional anti-subsidy duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles (BEVs), highlighting the growing rift in international trade dynamics.

US Section 301 tariffs target 60 trade partners after Supreme Court setback

US Section 301

US Section 301 tariffs are moving back to the center of US trade policy. The administration plans new import taxes on 60 major trade partners. US Section 301 tariffs aim to replace emergency tariffs the Supreme Court invalidated.

The US Trade Representative has opened investigations into 59 countries and the EU. Officials argue partners fail to block goods tied to forced labor in third countries. Therefore, the US wants a new legal path to impose broad tariffs by late July.

Why the US is pivoting from emergency tariffs to Section 301

Section 301 gives the US a well-used tool to target “unfair” foreign practices. The plan would expand that tool across dozens of jurisdictions at once. However, that scale could invite legal challenges and political pushback.

The administration already imposed a temporary 10pc tariff under Section 122. That measure expires on 24 July under the current timeline. As a result, the USTR wants Section 301 outcomes ready by that deadline.

What it means for metals, autos, and industrial supply chains

The Section 301 process does not change existing tariffs on steel, aluminium, cars, or auto parts. However, broad new duties can still raise landed costs for components, machinery, and inputs. That pressure can tighten working capital and push buyers toward regional sourcing.

US Section 301 tariffs also add compliance risk for importers and distributors. Firms may need stronger traceability on labor exposure across multi-tier supply chains. Meanwhile, refund uncertainty from earlier tariff disputes can keep companies cautious on spot purchases.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This strategy looks like legal re-engineering, not a narrow trade remedy. However, the forced-labor framing will test how fast partners can prove compliance at scale. The biggest near-term cost may come from uncertainty, not the final tariff rate.

South Africa’s Mineral Exports to the US Mostly Exempt from Tariffs

South Africa Minerals

Key South African Minerals, Including PGMs, Escape New US Tariffs Amid Trade Tensions

South Africa’s mineral exports to the United States, including valuable platinum group metals (PGMs), have been largely exempted from the latest round of US import tariffs. President Donald Trump's announcement on April 2, 2025, introduced reciprocal tariffs on a variety of goods, but crucial mineral exports such as PGMs, gold, manganese, titanium, chrome, and coal will not be subject to additional duties. However, some South African exports, such as iron ore and diamonds, will face a 30% tariff.

Impact of Tariffs on South Africa’s Economy

In 2024, South Africa exported 65.3 billion rand ($3.4 billion) worth of mineral products and precious metals to the US, with PGMs accounting for 76% of the total value. Despite the tariff exclusions on key minerals, other sectors, particularly the automotive industry, are expected to face significant economic impacts. The Minerals Council South Africa (MCSA) has warned that the new tariffs on iron ore and diamonds will hurt the country’s economy, particularly its automotive manufacturing sector.

Additionally, a separate 25% tariff on all US imports of cars and trucks, which took effect on March 26, 2025, is expected to reduce demand for automobiles in the US. This, in turn, will affect PGMs, as platinum, palladium, and rhodium are critical for the production of autocatalysts used to reduce vehicle exhaust emissions. Slowing car sales will result in reduced demand for PGMs, leading to potential price volatility in the near term.

Long-Term Outlook for PGMs

Despite these short-term concerns, the MCSA remains optimistic about the long-term outlook for PGMs. Although current market conditions may cause fluctuations in prices, the demand for PGMs is expected to remain strong over time. However, the broader economic challenges posed by these tariffs—particularly their potential impact on global growth—are concerning for the entire South African mining industry.

South Africa exports 7% of its goods to the US, a relatively small share in terms of total US imports (0.25%). Despite this, the country has limited capacity to retaliate against these tariffs. Experts suggest that South African exporters will need to explore alternative markets and enhance collaborative efforts to mitigate the impact of these tariffs.

Nickel Prices Drop Amid US 'Liberation Day' Tariffs

Nickel

Global Market Faces Recession Fears as Tariffs Hit Nickel Prices

Nickel prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) plunged to their lowest levels since October 2020, following the announcement of the US "liberation day" tariffs. These tariffs, introduced on April 2, were more substantial than anticipated, sending shockwaves throughout the base metals markets. As fears of a global recession intensified, the broader base metals, equities, and commodities markets experienced a sharp decline.

The US government imposed a 10% tariff on all trading partner countries effective April 5. Additionally, higher tariffs were set for countries with significant trade deficits with the US, scheduled to take effect from April 9. The uncertainty surrounding the tariffs, along with their broader impact, has contributed to confusion and panic selling among traders.

Uncertainty Fuels Market Turmoil

The nickel market has been particularly volatile in the wake of these developments. The initial drop in nickel prices following the announcement of the tariffs was relatively modest at 1%. However, prices plunged further, losing 3.6% on April 4 and a significant 4.9% on April 5, dropping to $14,550 per ton. This sharp decline can be attributed to China's retaliatory tariffs, which placed a 34% duty on US exports.

Nickel prices have now fallen to their lowest point since October 2020, and the situation remains dire for many producers. Reports suggest that more than three-quarters of refined nickel production is currently operating at a loss, given the prevailing market conditions. Additionally, class 1 nickel production costs in Indonesia, a key supplier, are reported to exceed $15,000 per ton, indicating that current nickel prices are unsustainable for many producers.

Tariff Confusion Exacerbates Nickel Sell-Off

The sell-off in nickel was further aggravated by the confusion surrounding the application of the tariffs. Market participants were uncertain whether LME-grade nickel would be exempt from the new tariffs. Official documents confirmed that a baseline 10% tariff would not apply to HS Code 7508, which pertains to "Other Articles of Nickel." However, the critical HS Code 7502, which covers "unwrought nickel" used for LME-deliverable class 1 nickel, did not receive similar exemption.

Some traders have already begun moving nickel shipments out of the US to avoid the uncertainty, with large European trading groups indicating that they are rerouting cargoes to Rotterdam, UK. Meanwhile, nickel imports into the US from Canada, the country's main supplier, have continued to flow without tariffs under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). However, the future of this arrangement remains unclear, as the upcoming April 9 tariff changes could subject Canada to the same 10% tariff as other countries with trade deficits.

Outlook for Nickel Producers and the Market

The nickel market remains in a precarious situation. With continued confusion around the tariff details and recession concerns gripping major economies, it’s unclear how long the current market conditions will last. As more tariff structures are implemented and market players react to these changes, the global nickel supply chain faces increasing uncertainty.

Amag aluminium earnings fall in 2Q as US tariffs squeeze margins

Amag aluminium

Amag aluminium earnings fell in the second quarter as US tariffs and higher costs hit profitability. EBITDA dropped 34.7% to €34.6mn while revenue rose 3.5% to €384.8mn. Shipments edged up 0.4% to 110,800t, yet pricing pressure intensified. Meanwhile, the 50% US tariff effective 4 June will weigh more on the second half. As a result, Amag aluminium earnings remain under strain despite stable volumes.

Tariffs and costs pressure all divisions

Tariffs and input inflation affected metals, casting, and rolling. The metals division absorbed higher alumina prices and US import duties. The casting unit faced sharper price pressure for recycled cast alloys. Therefore, the rolling division endured tariff-driven trade flow shifts and market price declines. Elevated energy and labour costs compounded the squeeze on margins and Amag aluminium earnings.

Half-year results and H2 setup

First-half EBITDA fell 15.4% to €80.6mn on revenue up 11.1% to €786.2mn. Shipments increased 2.9% to 220,400t, but profitability lagged volume. The company expects the 50% US tariff to bite harder in H2 2025. Management maintained stable capacity utilisation, yet near-term losses from tariffs and costs cannot be offset. The CEO urged a viable US trade agreement and improved domestic conditions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Tariff escalation is amplifying European downstream aluminium margin risk just as power and wage bills stay high. Amag’s levers are mix, energy efficiency, and sales re-routing while advocating predictable US-EU trade terms. Watch H2 for the full tariff impact and any relief from alumina and energy costs.