Trump 10pc tariffs plan raises fresh uncertainty for global trade

Trump tariffs

Trump 10pc tariffs are emerging as a backup weapon in Washington’s trade arsenal as legal scrutiny intensifies. Trump 10pc tariffs would act as a temporary bridge if the Supreme Court strikes down his 2025 emergency duties, reshaping how the White House uses trade law. For companies exposed to cross-border supply chains, Trump 10pc tariffs add another layer of risk on top of already complex tariff regimes.

Legal uncertainty around Trump 10pc tariffs and emergency powers

The administration is preparing a fallback plan that would immediately impose a temporary 10pc duty on imports if the Supreme Court overturns current emergency tariffs. Officials signal that Trump 10pc tariffs would likely rely on Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows up to 15pc tariffs for 150 days to address balance-of-payments issues. However, any extension beyond that window would require explicit congressional approval, injecting political risk into what has so far been a unilateral tariff strategy.

At the same time, the White House is mapping a second phase based on well-tested authorities such as Section 232 and Section 301. These tools target specific products or countries on national security or unfair trade grounds but require investigations, public consultations and time. As a result, Trump 10pc tariffs would function as a legal stopgap while more targeted measures are built, rather than a permanent framework. The pending Supreme Court decision on the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) will determine how far presidents can stretch emergency powers into broad-based tariff policy.

The court’s ruling will directly impact emergency tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China justified by fentanyl-related “economic emergencies,” along with broader duties of 10pc and higher on nearly all US trading partners. It will also affect emergency measures aimed at Brazil and India, where tariffs were tied to alleged speech suppression and Russian crude imports. But tariffs on steel, aluminium, cars and auto parts imposed under traditional authorities would remain intact, preserving some of the most consequential industry-specific barriers.

Revenue, refunds and the corporate “tariff overhang”

A critical question troubling even conservative justices is whether sweeping tariffs function as taxes that only Congress may levy. The US Treasury has collected nearly $260bn in customs duties during the first 11 months of Trump’s second term, creating a massive “tariff overhang.” Hundreds of companies have already filed lawsuits seeking refunds, turning the Supreme Court decision into a potential trigger for complex, multi-year repayment disputes.

The administration argues that tariffs are policy instruments, not taxes, and warns that broad refunds would be administratively chaotic and fiscally painful. Trump himself has said repaying duties “would be a complete mess,” signalling that even if the court limits IEEPA, the White House will resist rapid, sweeping restitution. For global manufacturers, traders and end-users, this means that current and historic tariff exposure may remain a financial and legal uncertainty for years.

The Metalnomist Commentary

For metals and industrial supply chains, the Trump 10pc tariffs debate is about far more than headline percentages. It is redefining the legal boundaries of presidential trade power, shaping how future administrations can weaponise tariffs in strategic sectors from steel and aluminium to critical minerals. Boardrooms should treat this not as a one-off legal drama, but as a structural shift toward more politicised, less predictable trade governance.

US Tariffs Pressure Copper Prices and Curb China’s Scrap Imports

China Copper

US tariffs, introduced by President Donald Trump on April 2, have significantly impacted global copper prices. The tariffs, set at a minimum 10% tax on all foreign imports, have caused concerns about weakened copper demand, particularly from key industries that rely on copper, such as automobiles and home appliances. China’s copper scrap imports are also under pressure due to retaliatory tariffs, which will be implemented by China on April 10.

Impact of Tariffs on Copper Prices

Following the announcement of tariffs, copper prices saw a dramatic decline. As of April 7, London Metal Exchange (LME) three-month copper prices fell to a one-year low of $8,105 per ton, a significant drop from $9,721 per ton on April 2. Similarly, Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) prices also plummeted to a three-month low of 73,640 yuan per ton from 79,890 yuan per ton during the same period.

Although copper itself is not directly affected by the new tariffs, the downstream sectors, such as automotive manufacturing and home appliances, face substantial tariffs. This will likely depress demand for copper, as these industries represent significant end-users of copper products.

US Tariffs on Cars and Appliances Affect Copper Demand

A 25% tariff on imported cars and trucks came into effect on April 3, with a further 25% tax on auto parts set to follow in May. The US light vehicle market saw significant growth in 2024, with sales climbing to 16.8 million units. Similarly, the US imported $23.5 billion worth of home appliances from China in 2024. These appliances, including cooling devices and electronics, represented 23% of global copper demand in 2023. The imposition of tariffs on these goods will likely lead to a reduction in copper demand from the US.

On a positive note, lower copper prices may drive copper fabricators to restock in the short term, especially after a significant price drop in late March. Data from the SHFE shows that copper stocks fell from 256,328 tons on March 21 to 225,736 tons by April 3, as downstream buyers rushed to purchase copper cathode in response to falling prices.

China’s Retaliatory Tariffs and Copper Scrap Imports

China’s planned tariffs on US copper scrap, set to take effect on April 10, will impact copper supply in the country. In 2024, China imported over 440,000 tons of copper scrap from the US, accounting for nearly 20% of its total copper scrap imports. However, market participants predict that some traders will attempt to bypass the tariffs by sourcing US-origin copper scrap from other countries.

In February, US copper scrap exports fell by 10% compared to the previous year, with China seeing the largest drop in imports. This decrease in exports can be attributed to tariff expectations, which have made it difficult for US exporters to remain competitive. The large spread between CME and LME prices has further strained export options, leaving US dealers with excess scrap volumes.

Limited Impact on Copper Concentrate and Cathode Supplies

China’s retaliatory tariffs are expected to have a minimal impact on its domestic copper concentrate and cathode supply. In 2024, China imported just 460,000 tons of copper concentrate and 1,575 tons of copper cathode from the US, representing only a small fraction of its total imports. Therefore, the retaliatory tariffs are unlikely to cause significant disruptions to these supply chains.

Trump's Abrupt Tariff Decision: Pausing Global Levies While Increasing China's Tariffs

China Tariff

In a surprising shift, President Donald Trump announced that he would pause the punitive tariffs on key US trading partners, which were set to begin today. However, he simultaneously raised tariffs on Chinese imports to an extraordinary 125%. This move marks a significant reversal from earlier statements, as Trump justified the pause with the recent volatility in financial markets, particularly in the stock and bond markets.

Pausing Global Tariffs but Targeting China

Trump’s decision, announced via social media, paused reciprocal tariffs on nearly every country except China. These tariffs, which had ranged from 17% on countries like the Philippines and Israel to 49% on Cambodia, were set to begin today. The pause will last for 90 days, offering a temporary respite to US trading partners.

However, the increased tariffs on Chinese imports stand in stark contrast. According to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the tariff rate on China will rise to an unprecedented 125%. This escalation follows ongoing trade tensions between the US and China, with China repeatedly increasing its trade actions against the US.

The EU, which would have faced a 20% tariff starting today, has already prepared retaliatory measures. The European Union has also proposed countermeasures for the 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports imposed earlier by the US.

Flexibility in Tariff Policy and Trade Negotiations

In a shift from earlier policy, President Trump indicated a willingness to consider exemptions for certain US importers who may be disproportionately affected by the tariffs. This move contrasts with previous statements where the administration had insisted on a blanket approach. Energy commodities and critical minerals were exempt from both the baseline 10% tariff and the higher reciprocal tariffs.

Furthermore, Bessent suggested that trade discussions may also involve non-trade issues, with the US considering a major LNG project in Alaska that could attract interest from South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. These potential deals could factor into negotiations aimed at reducing the US trade deficit with these countries.

China’s Response and Global Impact

China, predictably, responded to the new tariffs with its own retaliatory measures. As of April 10, China will increase import tariffs on US goods by 50 percentage points, reaching a total of 84%. This escalation underscores the growing trade conflict between the two largest economies in the world.

The UK and Canada have also indicated potential countermeasures. The UK, which remains subject to a 10% tariff, has included refined oil products from the US in a list of goods that could be targeted. Mexico and Canada, however, were excluded from the latest round of tariffs, further highlighting the complex nature of US trade policies.

Uncertainty Surrounds Tariff Strategy

The sudden reversal in tariff policy caught many in the administration by surprise. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who had been testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee, was blindsided by the announcement. This left many questioning the coherence and strategy behind Trump’s tariff decisions.

Representative Steven Horsford of Nevada remarked that there appeared to be no clear strategy, as evidenced by Greer’s reaction. This further compounded the sense of unpredictability surrounding US trade policy.

Conclusion: A Shifting Trade Landscape

President Trump's abrupt changes to tariff policies, particularly the increase in tariffs on China, signal that the US is deepening its trade conflict with the country. While the temporary pause on global tariffs provides some relief to US allies, the continued escalation with China may have long-lasting effects on global trade dynamics. As negotiations unfold, businesses worldwide will be watching closely to understand the full impact of these decisions.

Japan and South Korea Prepare for Economic Impact of US Metal Tariffs

Japan Manufacturing

Japan Takes a Cautious Approach, While South Korea Moves Quickly to Shield Its Automotive Industry

The imposition of US tariffs on metal products has left Japanese and South Korean industries scrambling to mitigate potential damages. Following US President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs, Japan’s metal firms are proceeding with caution. Tokyo is currently working on a strategy to strike a middle ground while preparing for any potential long-term effects. South Korea, on the other hand, has moved quickly to put measures in place to support its automotive industry, which stands to be significantly impacted by the tariffs.

Japan's Response to US Tariffs

In 2024, Japanese exports of machinery and electrical equipment to the US amounted to ¥7.8 trillion ($53 billion), reflecting a 5.3% increase from the previous year. Despite this growth, Japan's metal industry is not experiencing significant immediate impact from the new 24% tariffs imposed on steel and automobile products. However, companies are still closely monitoring the situation to understand the full extent of the potential damages. While some industry leaders remain uncertain, one Tokyo-based battery material producer noted that no damage had been reported yet from clients. Still, Japanese authorities are wary of long-term effects, especially in sectors like electronics and automotive, which would face major setbacks should the tariffs persist.

The Japanese government is refraining from retaliatory measures as negotiations with the US government continue. Japan hopes to reach an agreement that could either reduce the tariffs or potentially exempt the country from them entirely. On April 8, Japan’s Ministry of Trade and Industry (METI) will hold a ministerial meeting to discuss comprehensive measures in response to the tariffs.

South Korea Takes Swift Action to Support Its Economy

South Korea, with a more direct approach, is preparing to unveil measures aimed at mitigating the negative effects on its automotive sector. In 2024, South Korea exported $127.8 billion in goods to the US, including nearly $34.7 billion worth of passenger automobiles, $7 billion in auto parts, and nearly $3 billion in lithium-ion batteries. With such significant exports to the US, the potential impact of these tariffs could be severe.

The South Korean government, led by acting president Han Duck-soo, has vowed to work with the private sector to minimize damage. The government is planning follow-up measures to protect vulnerable sectors, such as small-medium enterprises and mid-sized companies. However, the country’s political instability, with the impeachment of former president Yoon Suk Yeol, may delay the response. South Korea’s aluminium sector is also on high alert, with companies looking to devise strategies to weather the storm.

Additionally, South Korean tech giant LG Electronics has warned that any further escalation in tariffs could have a pronounced impact on its operations, especially if the US introduces import quotas or safeguard measures. The company’s major production sites are spread across South Korea, China, Mexico, and Vietnam. LG's CFO, Changtae Kim, emphasized that higher tariffs would directly affect the company’s competitive position.

Looking Ahead

Both Japan and South Korea face uncertain futures as they navigate the complex landscape of US tariffs. Japan remains cautious, hoping for negotiations to alleviate the pressure, while South Korea moves swiftly to protect key sectors like automotive manufacturing. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining how both nations adapt to the evolving trade situation and whether their efforts to shield their industries from the tariffs will be successful.

Mexico's Auto Industry Struggles with US Tariffs Despite USMCA Exemption

Mexico Car Tariffs

Despite the recent decision by US President Donald Trump to pause reciprocal tariffs on several nations, Mexico's automotive industry continues to face significant challenges. The 25% tariffs on exports of automobiles, steel, and aluminum, announced last month, remain in place. These tariffs, coupled with Trump's global 25% tariff on auto imports, continue to impact Mexican carmakers.

USMCA Exemption Still Leaves Uncertainty

Mexico and Canada do benefit from an exemption in the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) for imports that comply with regional content rules. However, the specifics of how this exemption will be implemented remain unclear. Mexico is still in negotiations with the US to eliminate or reduce the tariffs in certain cases.

Gabriel Padilla, head of the Mexican auto parts association INA, explained that their primary focus is to extend the tariff application to auto parts covered by the USMCA. He stressed the importance of demonstrating the integration levels by component grade to show what is beneficial for both countries. According to a recent INA study, the US’s 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum could cost auto parts companies $2.94 billion more in additional costs.

Negotiations and Uncertainty Continue

Despite ongoing negotiations, the uncertainty surrounding the tariffs is causing some companies to pause exports while awaiting clarity. Rogelio Garza, president of the Mexican automaker association AMIA, mentioned that some companies are hesitant to continue shipments until the impact of the tariffs becomes clearer. He expects more concrete definitions regarding the auto tariffs within the next two months.

Garza also pointed out that the paused shipments contributed to a 6% decline in Mexican auto exports to the US in the first quarter, as reported by the national statistics agency Inegi. The total exports fell to 775,886 units, down from the previous year's figures.

Conclusion: A Time of Adjustment for Mexico’s Automotive Sector

The automotive industry in Mexico faces a period of uncertainty as it continues to navigate the effects of US tariffs. While the USMCA exemption provides some relief, the lack of clarity on its implementation and ongoing negotiations leave many carmakers in a state of flux. The situation is further complicated by the high costs imposed by the tariffs on steel, aluminum, and auto parts. As negotiations unfold, the next couple of months will be critical for determining the future of the Mexican automotive sector.

Nickel Prices Drop Amid US 'Liberation Day' Tariffs

Nickel

Global Market Faces Recession Fears as Tariffs Hit Nickel Prices

Nickel prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) plunged to their lowest levels since October 2020, following the announcement of the US "liberation day" tariffs. These tariffs, introduced on April 2, were more substantial than anticipated, sending shockwaves throughout the base metals markets. As fears of a global recession intensified, the broader base metals, equities, and commodities markets experienced a sharp decline.

The US government imposed a 10% tariff on all trading partner countries effective April 5. Additionally, higher tariffs were set for countries with significant trade deficits with the US, scheduled to take effect from April 9. The uncertainty surrounding the tariffs, along with their broader impact, has contributed to confusion and panic selling among traders.

Uncertainty Fuels Market Turmoil

The nickel market has been particularly volatile in the wake of these developments. The initial drop in nickel prices following the announcement of the tariffs was relatively modest at 1%. However, prices plunged further, losing 3.6% on April 4 and a significant 4.9% on April 5, dropping to $14,550 per ton. This sharp decline can be attributed to China's retaliatory tariffs, which placed a 34% duty on US exports.

Nickel prices have now fallen to their lowest point since October 2020, and the situation remains dire for many producers. Reports suggest that more than three-quarters of refined nickel production is currently operating at a loss, given the prevailing market conditions. Additionally, class 1 nickel production costs in Indonesia, a key supplier, are reported to exceed $15,000 per ton, indicating that current nickel prices are unsustainable for many producers.

Tariff Confusion Exacerbates Nickel Sell-Off

The sell-off in nickel was further aggravated by the confusion surrounding the application of the tariffs. Market participants were uncertain whether LME-grade nickel would be exempt from the new tariffs. Official documents confirmed that a baseline 10% tariff would not apply to HS Code 7508, which pertains to "Other Articles of Nickel." However, the critical HS Code 7502, which covers "unwrought nickel" used for LME-deliverable class 1 nickel, did not receive similar exemption.

Some traders have already begun moving nickel shipments out of the US to avoid the uncertainty, with large European trading groups indicating that they are rerouting cargoes to Rotterdam, UK. Meanwhile, nickel imports into the US from Canada, the country's main supplier, have continued to flow without tariffs under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). However, the future of this arrangement remains unclear, as the upcoming April 9 tariff changes could subject Canada to the same 10% tariff as other countries with trade deficits.

Outlook for Nickel Producers and the Market

The nickel market remains in a precarious situation. With continued confusion around the tariff details and recession concerns gripping major economies, it’s unclear how long the current market conditions will last. As more tariff structures are implemented and market players react to these changes, the global nickel supply chain faces increasing uncertainty.

New US Tariffs Could Significantly Impact European Aluminium Scrap Exports

Aluminium Scrap

European aluminium recycling faces challenges as US tariffs on scrap imports rise.

The recent announcement of new tariffs by the United States government, particularly on aluminium scrap from Europe, is sending ripples through the European aluminium recycling industry. The sweeping tariff adjustments, which were introduced by US President Donald Trump on April 2, threaten to significantly reduce the flow of European aluminium scrap to the US. With these new measures, aluminium scrap will face a substantial tariff, making it less attractive for US buyers.

Impact of New Tariffs on Aluminium Scrap Exports

The new tariffs, set to take effect on April 9, place aluminium scrap imports from Europe under a 20% tariff, while imports from the UK will face a slightly lower 10% tariff. This comes after the previously established 25% tariff on primary aluminium imports from Europe, which was put in place last month. As a result, the cost of importing aluminium scrap from Europe will be nearly as high as that for importing primary aluminium, significantly altering the economics of aluminium recycling.

Historically, the US had been a major buyer of European aluminium scrap, with many industries using recycled aluminium as an alternative to primary aluminium. The new tariffs, however, will likely make scrap imports much less appealing to US buyers, pushing them to explore other options. This comes after previous expectations that the US would turn to aluminium scrap as a more affordable alternative to primary aluminium, which is now burdened by hefty tariffs.

Reactions from Industry Associations

Industry associations such as European Aluminium and Aluminium Deutschland have voiced concerns over the new tariffs, as they undermine the viability of aluminium scrap exports. These associations had earlier called for export restrictions on scrap due to fears that large-scale shipments of aluminium scrap could exacerbate market imbalances. With the tariffs in place, the likelihood of scrap exports to the US is expected to diminish significantly.

European Aluminium has indicated that it is closely monitoring the situation to determine its next steps regarding export restrictions. Aluminium Deutschland, however, has yet to comment on the matter.

What This Means for the Aluminium Recycling Industry

These new tariffs could lead to a shift in the global aluminium market. If European aluminium scrap becomes less competitive due to high tariffs, it may force US buyers to seek out other sources of aluminium scrap, possibly from domestic markets or alternative suppliers. Additionally, this could put pressure on European recyclers, who may face reduced demand for their products, forcing them to explore new markets or adjust their pricing strategies.

As the situation evolves, the aluminium recycling industry in Europe will need to adapt to these new challenges, either by lobbying for changes in tariff policies or by finding ways to remain competitive in an increasingly restricted global market.

US New Tariffs Could Disrupt China's Non-Exempt Metals Exports

China Tariffs

New tariffs on lithium, rare earth magnets, and more could affect China's metal exports to the US.

The United States has announced significant new tariffs on Chinese imports, with a notable focus on metals. While many non-ferrous metals and ferro-alloys have been exempted, some crucial exports from China, like lithium, rare earth magnets, and lithium-ion batteries, will face substantial increases in tariff rates. These changes are set to have a lasting impact on the trade between the US and China, especially in the energy storage and electric vehicle (EV) sectors.

High Tariffs on Lithium-Ion Batteries and Energy Storage

As of April 9, the US will implement an 82.4% tariff on electric vehicle (EV) power batteries and a 57.4% tariff on non-EV lithium-ion batteries from China. This substantial hike in tariffs will make Chinese-made batteries far more expensive and may eliminate the possibility of Chinese EV power batteries entering the US market. US consumers will likely absorb these costs, potentially leading to inflation in the US battery industry, especially in the energy storage sector.

China’s lithium-ion battery exports to the US had already been on the rise, with a 59% increase in exports during the first two months of the year. However, these new tariffs are expected to curb the growth of China's battery exports to the US and negatively affect lithium feedstock prices, which are currently at a four-year low.

Impact on Rare Earth Magnets

Rare earth magnets are another key area of concern, as these products were not exempted from the new tariffs. Despite some uncertainty about the exact tariff implementation, producers in China are anxious about the potential 54% tariff on rare earth magnets. China remains the dominant supplier of rare earth magnets globally, and while the US does have some alternatives, they are mostly focused on military applications with significantly higher prices. This makes it unlikely that the US can fully escape its dependence on China, especially for civilian applications.

China’s exports of rare earth magnets to the US in 2022 accounted for 12% of its total exports, and while tariffs could reduce this figure, China’s competitive pricing in the civil sector ensures its continued dominance in the global market.

Copper, Aluminium, and Hafnium: Other Affected Metals

While copper and aluminium are exempt from this latest round of tariffs, the copper industry remains on edge. US authorities are investigating the potential security implications of copper imports, and there’s speculation that a tariff may be imposed in the future. As for aluminium, Chinese exports are already subject to a steep 70% tariff, which is expected to discourage further aluminium exports to the US, pushing Chinese suppliers to seek alternative markets.

Hafnium, a critical metal used in aerospace applications, will also face a significant tariff hike, moving from 34% to 79%. This change could prompt US buyers to source hafnium from other regions, like Rotterdam, where the tariff is considerably lower.

Conclusion

The new US tariffs on Chinese metals exports are set to reshape the global metals market, particularly for lithium-ion batteries, rare earth magnets, and hafnium. While some sectors, like copper and aluminium, may have avoided immediate tariff hikes, long-term implications for the industry remain uncertain. The tariff increase on key metal exports from China to the US is expected to alter supply chains and increase costs for US consumers, especially in the EV and energy storage markets.

EU Prepares Countermeasures Against U.S. Import Tariffs

U.S. Tariffs

The European Union is finalizing a series of countermeasures in response to the U.S.'s decision to impose a 20% tariff on imports, effective April 9. These tariffs are in addition to the existing duties on various goods, particularly steel and aluminum, which have already been heavily impacted by U.S. trade policies. The European Commission is working on a first set of responses, and further actions may be introduced depending on how the tariffs affect EU industries.

EU's Strong Stance Against U.S. Tariffs

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the EU's firm position on combating what it perceives as unfair trade practices. Von der Leyen stated that Europe will not accept "dumping" in its markets, referring to the practice of selling products at artificially low prices. The EU’s commitment to protecting its markets from global overcapacity remains a key aspect of its response. Von der Leyen also expressed disappointment, noting that many Europeans feel let down by their “oldest ally” – a reference to the U.S.

Impact on Non-Ferrous Metals, Energy, and Minerals

The U.S. tariffs, set to begin on April 9, will apply to most foreign imports, with some key exceptions. Energy products, as well as various minerals, including non-ferrous metals, are exempt from the new tariffs. Additionally, oil products, base oils, coal, and some fertilizers and chemicals will not be subject to the new duties. However, the tariff will still target steel, aluminum, and automobiles, industries that have already been under the strain of separate, earlier tariffs.

A Changing Global Trade Landscape

These tariffs are expected to have significant effects on global trade, particularly in sectors that rely heavily on international imports and exports. With many European industries vulnerable to the impact of these tariffs, the EU is preparing to take action to mitigate any economic fallout. The bloc is closely monitoring indirect effects, which could involve shifts in trade patterns and increased pressure on affected sectors.

Conclusion: Europe's Preparedness in a Trade Conflict

As the EU finalizes its countermeasures, the bloc is determined to protect its markets and industries from the negative effects of U.S. tariffs. Although the initial measures focus on steel and aluminum, the broader scope of U.S. tariff policies could continue to challenge global trade dynamics. The EU’s response will likely shape future trade relations between Europe and the U.S. in the coming months.

EU BEV Industry Faces Challenges Without Strong CO2 Targets and Tariffs

The European Union's battery electric vehicle (BEV) market is at risk of losing ground to Chinese-owned brands unless the EU enforces its planned CO2 emission reduction targets along with newly proposed tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs). According to Transport & Environment (T&E), a leading environmental lobby group, these measures are essential to maintaining the competitive edge of European carmakers. The European Commission announced today that it will proceed with provisional tariffs on Chinese-manufactured EVs, signaling a critical step in addressing market imbalances.

CO2 Targets Key to Curbing Chinese BEV Imports

T&E's analysis shows a significant increase in the market share of Chinese-owned BEV brands, projecting that imports will constitute over 12% of the EU market this year, up from 8% last year. In contrast, non-Chinese brands are expected to see a slight rise to 13%. Without the enforcement of CO2 reduction targets, T&E forecasts that Chinese brands could capture nearly 15% of the market by next year, a trend that could weaken local BEV producers unless incentives are aligned to encourage a shift towards carbon-neutral vehicles.

The EU has established CO2 targets that require all automakers to achieve net zero emissions across their fleets by 2035, with interim milestones starting next year. However, recent debates and scrutiny have created uncertainty, prompting resistance from industry players. Aurelien De Meaux, CEO of Electra, a Paris-based charging start-up, emphasized the need for policy stability, stating, "The path to 2035, including specific CO2 milestones, was established in 2014 and 2019. We rely on this stability to make informed and effective investments."

Tariffs Alone May Not Protect Western BEV Producers

While the European Commission's provisional tariffs aim to level the playing field, a report by the Rhodium Group suggests that tariffs alone might not suffice. Chinese brands continue to enjoy profit margins that can absorb the costs of EU tariffs, whereas Western brands like Tesla and BMW, which manufacture in China, could see diminished profitability if tariffs are enforced. This dynamic has led to concerns that the tariffs may inadvertently harm European carmakers with overseas production facilities.

Additionally, China's response to these tariffs has included the potential for retaliatory measures on other goods, and its automakers are considering expanding production capacity overseas. Since 2022, 11 Chinese-owned EV plants have been planned in Europe, but only three have advanced past initial planning, primarily due to tariff uncertainties.

The situation is further complicated by instability in the battery production sector. According to T&E, 59% of the planned battery production capacity in Europe is "less likely" to proceed by 2030, adding to the challenges faced by the EU's BEV industry. Maintaining a clear and consistent regulatory approach will be crucial to incentivizing local production and reducing dependency on imports, ensuring the long-term sustainability of Europe's BEV market.

Blanket US Aluminium Tariffs to Have Limited Impact on European Trade Flows

US Aluminium

Trump's 25% Tariff on All Aluminium Imports Will Affect US Consumers, Not European Markets

US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a blanket 25% tariff on all aluminium imports is expected to have minimal impact on European trade flows. This contrasts with earlier plans to impose tariffs specifically on imports from Canada and Mexico. According to market participants, the new approach is unlikely to disrupt European markets as much as the previous strategy might have.

Impact of Blanket Tariffs on Aluminium Trade

Trump’s new tariffs, which will apply to all aluminium imports, are set to be announced soon. This blanket tariff on steel and aluminium is expected to affect all exporting countries without distinguishing between suppliers. Canada, the UAE, and Argentina were the leading exporters of unwrought aluminium to the US last year, but the tariffs will now apply to everyone, making it difficult for countries like Canada to redirect excess supplies to Europe as initially anticipated.

Under the previous plan, markets predicted a shift in trade flows, with more Canadian aluminium potentially moving to Europe. This was expected to reduce European premiums due to an increase in supply, as demand in Europe remained weak. However, under the new tariff strategy, this shift is likely to be less pronounced. The global competitiveness of Canadian aluminium is diminished when tariffs apply universally, making aluminium from other regions, such as the Middle East and South America, less attractive in the US market.

Consequences for US Consumers and Domestic Production

The main consequence of these blanket tariffs will be higher costs for US consumers. While the tariffs could potentially drive up domestic production, increasing capacity will take years. In the meantime, US buyers will face higher prices for aluminium imports, particularly from Canada, as shipping times from these suppliers are shorter than those from more distant countries.

Market analysts believe that, despite the tariffs, US consumers will continue to import from Canada because of these logistical advantages. The blanket tariff strategy is unlikely to redirect a significant volume of Canadian aluminium to Europe, meaning the overall impact on European aluminium flows will be minimal.

Conclusion: A Shift in Costs, Not Trade Flows

In conclusion, Trump’s blanket tariffs on aluminium imports are expected to result in higher costs for US consumers but will have limited consequences for European trade flows. The market will likely experience some adjustments, but European aluminium premiums are not expected to drop significantly as a result of these changes.

EU-US Trade Agreement Moves Toward Approval as Steel and Aluminium Tariff Risks Remain

Steelmaking

EU-US trade agreement approval moved closer after the European Parliament’s trade committee backed legislation to implement the deal reached last July. The committee voted 29-9 with one abstention, signalling a clear majority before the expected plenary vote on 26 March.

The EU-US trade agreement is designed to provide stability in transatlantic trade after years of tariff pressure, industrial disputes, and geopolitical tension. However, the committee’s position shows that Europe wants stronger safeguards before implementation becomes final.

The EU-US trade agreement remains especially important for metals-intensive sectors. Steel, aluminium, machinery, automotive components, and industrial equipment all sit directly inside the tariff debate.

Parliament Seeks Safeguards Against New US Tariffs

The trade committee wants a suspension clause if the US imposes new tariffs on EU states. It also wants implementation to depend on US compliance with the agreement and stronger protection against steel import pressure.

German lawmaker Bernd Lange said the legislation aims to provide stability, but he warned that tariffs imposed on the EU or individual member states over foreign policy decisions would be unacceptable. His comments reflect European concern that trade policy could again become linked to wider political disputes.

The committee’s position also targets the treatment of EU products containing steel or aluminium. Lange called on the US to reduce tariffs on EU products containing less than 50pc steel or aluminium from 50pc to 15pc before the EU completes implementation.

Steel and Aluminium Remain Central to Transatlantic Trade Tensions

Section 232 tariffs remain the key industrial issue. Lange warned that if Section 232 tariffs rise from 10pc to 15pc, many EU products could face effective duties above the 15pc ceiling once most favoured nation tariffs are added.

That risk matters because many manufactured goods contain embedded steel or aluminium. Higher effective tariffs could hit machinery, automotive parts, appliances, industrial components, and downstream manufacturing supply chains.

The committee’s backing still suggests broad support for the deal. Swedish lawmaker Jorgen Warborn said the EU should uphold its commitments, while also calling for safeguards against new US tariffs. That position captures the political balance: Europe wants the stability of the agreement, but not at the cost of accepting future unilateral tariff measures.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU-US trade agreement may reduce uncertainty, but metals remain the stress test for transatlantic trade. Steel and aluminium tariffs are no longer narrow trade tools; they are industrial policy instruments that shape competitiveness across entire manufacturing chains.

Metal Craft US Expansion Shows How Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Are Reshaping Manufacturing

Metal Craft Spinning and Stamping

Metal Craft US expansion shows how US metal tariffs are changing cross-border manufacturing decisions. The Ontario-based fabricator plans to invest $1.3mn in a new plant in Niagara Falls, New York. The move is meant to reduce the cost pressure created by US steel and aluminum tariffs. As a result, Metal Craft US expansion reflects a wider industrial response to rising trade barriers.

The project includes renovations, machining equipment, and installation at a 25,000ft² industrial site. It is also expected to create 17 jobs. That makes the investment modest in size but important in meaning. Therefore, Metal Craft US expansion is less about scale and more about strategic positioning inside the US market.

The business logic is straightforward. Nearly three-quarters of Metal Craft’s customer base is in the United States. Serving those customers from inside the US can reduce tariff exposure and improve commercial flexibility. Consequently, US metal tariffs are influencing plant location decisions as much as product pricing.

US Metal Tariffs Are Pushing Manufacturers Toward Local Production

US metal tariffs are pushing foreign manufacturers to rethink how they serve the American market. President Donald Trump’s 50pc tariffs on steel and aluminum have raised the cost of cross-border supply for many producers. That pressure is especially strong for firms with heavy US sales exposure. As a result, some companies now see US production as a defensive necessity.

This shift matters because it changes investment patterns, not just trade flows. Instead of paying higher tariff costs, manufacturers may move part of their operations into the United States. That can protect customer relationships and preserve margins. Therefore, steel and aluminum tariffs are starting to reshape manufacturing geography in North America.

Cross-Border Manufacturing Now Faces a Higher Strategic Cost

Cross-border manufacturing has become harder to justify when tariff pressure stays high. Metal Craft fabricates products for roofing, construction equipment, furniture, and other industrial uses. These are practical end markets where cost competitiveness and delivery reliability matter. Meanwhile, tariff friction can quickly weaken both.

The broader implication is clear. Companies that rely heavily on US customers may now favor US-based processing, fabrication, or finishing capacity. That does not mean cross-border trade will disappear. However, it does mean the cost of staying outside the US has increased materially. Consequently, Metal Craft US expansion may become part of a wider trend among foreign metal fabricators.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This investment matters because it shows tariffs are doing more than raising prices. They are influencing where companies place real industrial assets. If tariff policy stays firm, more fabricators may choose local US production over cross-border exposure.

China Files WTO Case Against US Tariffs

Beijing Challenges US 10% Tariffs on Chinese Goods, Accusing Washington of Trade Protectionism

On February 5, 2025, China filed a case with the World Trade Organization (WTO) challenging the United States' additional 10% tariffs on all Chinese goods. This move follows the implementation of the tariffs on February 4, 2025, as announced by the US government under President Donald Trump’s administration. The case was officially circulated to WTO members on the same day, as confirmed by the WTO.

A Growing Trade Dispute: China’s Strong Response to US Tariffs

The US’s blanket 10% tariffs on Chinese imports add to the previous tariffs imposed during both Trump’s and former President Joe Biden’s terms. This action has intensified the trade tension between the two global powers, with China strongly criticizing the move. China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a statement describing the tariffs as a serious violation of WTO rules and an example of “unilateralism and trade protectionism.” It further claimed that these tariffs undermine the multilateral trading system and disrupt the stability of global industrial and supply chains.

In retaliation, China imposed its own set of tariffs on a range of US goods, including crude oil, coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG), thermal and coking coal, as well as large displacement vehicles and pick-up trucks. Additionally, China has expanded its export controls to include more critical minerals, further escalating the trade conflict.

Geopolitical Tensions and the WTO's Role

This WTO case is part of the broader geopolitical tensions between China and the Western world, which have been steadily increasing in recent years. While the WTO offers a platform for dispute resolution, some industry participants are uncertain about the case’s potential success, especially given Trump’s past threats to withdraw from the WTO, as well as his withdrawal from other international agreements such as the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization (WHO).

In August 2024, China also filed a case against the European Union (EU) for imposing provisional anti-subsidy duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles (BEVs), highlighting the growing rift in international trade dynamics.

South Africa’s Mineral Exports to the US Mostly Exempt from Tariffs

South Africa Minerals

Key South African Minerals, Including PGMs, Escape New US Tariffs Amid Trade Tensions

South Africa’s mineral exports to the United States, including valuable platinum group metals (PGMs), have been largely exempted from the latest round of US import tariffs. President Donald Trump's announcement on April 2, 2025, introduced reciprocal tariffs on a variety of goods, but crucial mineral exports such as PGMs, gold, manganese, titanium, chrome, and coal will not be subject to additional duties. However, some South African exports, such as iron ore and diamonds, will face a 30% tariff.

Impact of Tariffs on South Africa’s Economy

In 2024, South Africa exported 65.3 billion rand ($3.4 billion) worth of mineral products and precious metals to the US, with PGMs accounting for 76% of the total value. Despite the tariff exclusions on key minerals, other sectors, particularly the automotive industry, are expected to face significant economic impacts. The Minerals Council South Africa (MCSA) has warned that the new tariffs on iron ore and diamonds will hurt the country’s economy, particularly its automotive manufacturing sector.

Additionally, a separate 25% tariff on all US imports of cars and trucks, which took effect on March 26, 2025, is expected to reduce demand for automobiles in the US. This, in turn, will affect PGMs, as platinum, palladium, and rhodium are critical for the production of autocatalysts used to reduce vehicle exhaust emissions. Slowing car sales will result in reduced demand for PGMs, leading to potential price volatility in the near term.

Long-Term Outlook for PGMs

Despite these short-term concerns, the MCSA remains optimistic about the long-term outlook for PGMs. Although current market conditions may cause fluctuations in prices, the demand for PGMs is expected to remain strong over time. However, the broader economic challenges posed by these tariffs—particularly their potential impact on global growth—are concerning for the entire South African mining industry.

South Africa exports 7% of its goods to the US, a relatively small share in terms of total US imports (0.25%). Despite this, the country has limited capacity to retaliate against these tariffs. Experts suggest that South African exporters will need to explore alternative markets and enhance collaborative efforts to mitigate the impact of these tariffs.

US Steel Tariffs and Chinese Oversupply Risk

NIPPON STEEL

Japan’s mills warn US steel tariffs and Chinese oversupply risk will worsen global imbalances. They expect weaker demand and thinner margins. As a result, US steel tariffs and Chinese oversupply risk could squeeze autos and machinery. Nippon Steel and JFE both flag profit and volume pressure. Therefore, US steel tariffs and Chinese oversupply risk now dominate boardroom planning.

Japan’s producers brace for weaker demand and profit hits

Nippon Steel projects a ¥50bn operating profit hit from tariffs and oversupply. The firm will cut crude steel output to 17mn t in April–September. It will also reduce export exposure to 40pc over six months. Meanwhile, JFE calls US tariffs the “biggest risk” to domestic demand. Both companies cite China’s slowdown and export push as key threats.

Autos and machinery face sharper headwinds under new trade frictions

Auto demand may weaken as tariffs raise costs and unsettle supply chains. Construction machinery demand could drop because 30pc of output ships to the US. High borrowing costs already depress equipment orders in Europe and Asia. Japanese service centers may delay restocking amid uncertainty. Inventory discipline will likely persist through fiscal 2025–26.

Global steel oversupply risk is rising as China redirects material. Tariffs could channel more Chinese exports into third markets. That shift pressures prices and spreads in Asia and the Middle East. Japan’s mills prepare for longer lead times on price recovery. Policy clarity and coordinated trade frameworks would stabilize flows sooner.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Japanese steel now faces a two-front challenge: a soft China and tariff reshuffles. Expect tighter product mix management and higher value-add focus to defend margins. Watch autos and yellow goods; any demand stabilization there could cap downside in H2.

Canada Removes Tariffs on USMCA-Covered Goods

USMCA

Canada removes tariffs on USMCA-covered goods effective 1 September, prime minister Mark Carney said. Canada removes tariffs on USMCA-covered goods to mirror the US stance on IEEPA tariffs. Therefore, Canada removes tariffs on USMCA-covered goods while keeping separate metal and auto duties.

What changes now — and what stays

Canada lifts retaliatory tariffs on goods covered by USMCA. The move aligns with Washington’s exemption for Canadian exports. However, Canada maintains a 25% tariff on US steel, aluminum, and automobiles. The US still levies 50% on Canadian steel and aluminum. Average US tariffs on Canadian goods are 5.6%. That compares with nearly 16% globally, Ottawa notes. Trump welcomed Ottawa’s decision and signaled further talks. Both sides will intensify discussions on strategic sectors.

Metals, autos, and the 2026 review

For metals, headline tariffs remain the real constraint. Therefore, steel and aluminum flows still face elevated costs. Auto supply chains gain clarity from the USMCA alignment. However, ring-fenced duties still cloud pricing and sourcing. A joint USMCA review begins in spring 2026. The process could last 6–18 months, shaping future market access. Meanwhile, Ottawa will launch “nation-building projects” to diversify markets. That aims to reduce exposure to US policy shifts.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Policy alignment lowers headline risk but leaves key frictions in metals. Watch the 2026 review for origin rules, CBAM interfaces, and any metal-specific carve-outs that could reset costs.

Rivian tariffs impact: thousands added per EV through 2025

Rivian

Rivian tariffs impact will add thousands of dollars per vehicle through 2025. The Rivian tariffs impact also threatens cash flow and margins. As a result, the Rivian tariffs impact forces pricing, mix, and cost actions across the lineup.

Tariffs, credits, and guidance under pressure

Rivian warned policy shifts will reshape 2025 results. Changes include EV tax credits, regulatory credits, trade rules, and tariffs. The company eliminated its 2025 regulatory credit revenue expectations. It cut guidance to $160mn from $300mn. However, Rivian reaffirmed 2025 deliveries at 40,000–46,000 units.

Product mix, costs, and demand outlook

Rivian said the R1 leads premium SUVs above $70,000. Management expects strong R1 demand into the third quarter. Meanwhile, the R2 program stays on track for first-half 2026. The R2 bill of materials is about half of R1. That supports lower pricing and broader addressable demand.

Rivian delivered 10,661 vehicles in the second quarter. Deliveries fell 23pc year on year amid market noise. Even so, the company sees long-term EV competition easing. Incumbents face weaker incentives to electrify quickly. Therefore, Rivian focuses on scale, content cost, and factory efficiency.

The firm narrowed its quarterly loss to $206mn. It raised guidance for adjusted EBITDA losses to $2.0bn–2.25bn. Prior guidance was $1.7bn–$1.9bn. Management flagged tariffs as a material headwind per unit. Pricing, options, and procurement must offset the per-vehicle burden.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Tariffs now function like a variable tax on EV bill of materials. Leaders will respond with design-to-cost, domestic sourcing, and disciplined trims. Watch R2 sourcing decisions and take-rate strategies; these will determine Rivian’s path to scale profitability.

Leveraging Section 301 Tariffs to Combat Circumvention of Chinese Steel and Aluminum Exports

In light of significant government subsidies aiding low-cost Chinese steel and aluminum products, the U.S. steel and aluminum industries advocate for the extension of Section 301 tariffs beyond China to third-party countries. This strategic move aims to shield U.S. industries from the influx of cheap, subsidized materials. The Aluminum Association (AA) and the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) have both submitted statements to the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), urging enhanced enforcement measures to prevent the circumvention of existing tariffs.

Industry Concerns and Actions

The AA emphasized the need to impose anti-dumping and countervailing duties on Chinese imports, which has effectively reduced China's direct exports to the U.S. However, the redirection of these exports to third-party countries has surged, threatening U.S. manufacturers who produce similar goods. Consequently, industry representatives are pushing for the expansion of Section 301 tariffs to encompass processed Chinese steel and aluminum products entering the U.S. via third countries.

The Biden administration, following a review of Section 301 tariffs applied from 2018 to 2022, announced an increase in tariffs on a series of products, including steel and aluminum, effective August 1. Despite this, U.S. industries call for broader application of these tariffs to include circumvention through third-party processing.

Detailed Proposals and Data

In their statement, AISI highlighted the necessity of reinforcing origin regulations for steel products processed in third countries using Chinese materials. The current determination of origin by the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is based on the final substantial transformation location. AISI advocates for considering the melting and pouring locations to prevent unfair trade practices.

Data from the Department of Commerce’s Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System (SIMA) indicate that approximately 1.7 million metric tons of Chinese-origin steel have entered the U.S. since January 1, 2022, with 17% processed in third countries. AISI suspects that actual figures may be higher due to underreported origin data.

Strategic Importance and Recommendations

Expanding Section 301 tariffs to cover Chinese steel and aluminum products processed in third countries would send a strong message of the administration's commitment to combating unfair trade practices and protecting American jobs. The AA further recommended extending these tariffs to aluminum-intensive products manufactured using Chinese aluminum in third countries, aligning with USTR Katherine Tai's goals of protecting U.S. workers and bolstering supply chain resilience.

US Section 301 tariffs target 60 trade partners after Supreme Court setback

US Section 301

US Section 301 tariffs are moving back to the center of US trade policy. The administration plans new import taxes on 60 major trade partners. US Section 301 tariffs aim to replace emergency tariffs the Supreme Court invalidated.

The US Trade Representative has opened investigations into 59 countries and the EU. Officials argue partners fail to block goods tied to forced labor in third countries. Therefore, the US wants a new legal path to impose broad tariffs by late July.

Why the US is pivoting from emergency tariffs to Section 301

Section 301 gives the US a well-used tool to target “unfair” foreign practices. The plan would expand that tool across dozens of jurisdictions at once. However, that scale could invite legal challenges and political pushback.

The administration already imposed a temporary 10pc tariff under Section 122. That measure expires on 24 July under the current timeline. As a result, the USTR wants Section 301 outcomes ready by that deadline.

What it means for metals, autos, and industrial supply chains

The Section 301 process does not change existing tariffs on steel, aluminium, cars, or auto parts. However, broad new duties can still raise landed costs for components, machinery, and inputs. That pressure can tighten working capital and push buyers toward regional sourcing.

US Section 301 tariffs also add compliance risk for importers and distributors. Firms may need stronger traceability on labor exposure across multi-tier supply chains. Meanwhile, refund uncertainty from earlier tariff disputes can keep companies cautious on spot purchases.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This strategy looks like legal re-engineering, not a narrow trade remedy. However, the forced-labor framing will test how fast partners can prove compliance at scale. The biggest near-term cost may come from uncertainty, not the final tariff rate.