Stellantis NextStar Battery JV Exit Signals a New Shift in North American Battery Strategy

NextStar Battery

Stellantis NextStar battery JV exit marks another important shift in North American battery strategy. Stellantis will sell its 49pc stake in NextStar Energy to LG Energy Solution. The joint venture built Canada’s first large-scale lithium-ion battery plant in Windsor, Ontario. As a result, Stellantis NextStar battery JV exit shows that automakers are rethinking how they participate in battery manufacturing.

This move matters because NextStar was a major industrial project. Stellantis and LG Energy Solution invested more than C$5bn in the venture. Yet the ownership structure is now changing even as the plant remains strategically important. Therefore, Stellantis NextStar battery JV exit is not a retreat from batteries. It is a shift in how the company wants to access them.

Stellantis will remain a customer of the facility after the transaction. That means the company still wants battery supply, but no longer wants to own nearly half of the manufacturing platform. Consequently, Stellantis NextStar battery JV exit reflects a broader trend toward supply access without full operating exposure.

EV Battery Joint Ventures Are Moving Into a New Phase

EV battery joint ventures are no longer being treated as fixed long-term ownership models. Automakers are increasingly separating battery access from battery plant ownership. That change is becoming visible across North America. As a result, EV battery joint ventures are entering a more flexible and less traditional phase.

The Stellantis decision fits a wider pattern. Other major automakers have also restructured or exited battery partnerships. General Motors sold its Michigan battery JV stake to LG Energy Solution in 2025. Ford also changed the structure of its BlueOval SK partnership later that year. Therefore, Stellantis NextStar battery JV exit looks less like an isolated deal and more like an industry reset.

This shift likely reflects changing economics and strategy. Battery manufacturing is capital-intensive, operationally complex, and increasingly competitive. Automakers may now prefer to secure output through commercial agreements while leaving plant ownership and operation to battery specialists. Meanwhile, battery makers can broaden their customer base more easily under that structure.

North American Battery Strategy Is Becoming More Specialized

North American battery strategy is now moving toward clearer specialization between automakers and cell producers. After the ownership change, NextStar will serve a broader customer base, including the energy storage system sector. That gives the plant more flexibility than a single-customer automotive model. As a result, the facility may become commercially stronger even as Stellantis reduces direct ownership.

This matters because battery plants are no longer only tied to electric vehicle demand. Energy storage systems are becoming a second major growth market. A battery facility that can sell into both EVs and stationary storage may have better long-term utilization and lower concentration risk. Therefore, North American battery strategy is becoming more diversified at the customer level.

The broader lesson is clear. Automakers still need batteries, but they may not want to carry the same level of manufacturing ownership risk as before. Battery producers, meanwhile, can gain more control and expand into wider end markets. Consequently, Stellantis NextStar battery JV exit may signal a more mature phase in the North American battery buildout.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This deal matters because it shows the battery race is no longer only about building plants. It is now about deciding who should own them, run them, and absorb the risk. Stellantis still wants battery supply, but LGES now looks better positioned to turn NextStar into a broader industrial platform.

Indonesia Battery Ecosystem Project Moves Forward With New Chinese Partnership

Aneka Tambang

The Indonesia battery ecosystem project is moving into a new phase with a fresh Chinese partnership. Antam, Industri Baterai Indonesia, and HYD Investment signed a framework agreement to develop an integrated battery ecosystem in Indonesia. This follows the exit of LG Energy Solution in 2025. As a result, the Indonesia battery ecosystem project remains alive and strategically important.

The change in partners matters because the project scale remains significant. Antam said the planned investment value is around $5-6 billion. A joint feasibility study will now define the next steps. Therefore, the Indonesia battery ecosystem project is shifting from partner transition into renewed execution planning.

HYD brings a strong industrial base to the table. The consortium includes Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, EVE Energy, and Daaz Bara Lestari. That mix adds processing, battery, and investment capability. Consequently, the project gains a broader foundation across the battery value chain.

Indonesia Nickel Battery Chain Expands From Ore to Cells

The Indonesia nickel battery chain is central to this project’s logic. Planned facilities include an RKEF plant with 100,000 t/yr of nickel metal equivalent capacity. The project also includes an HPAL plant with 50,000 t/yr of nickel metal equivalent capacity. Therefore, upstream and midstream nickel conversion remain core pillars.

The downstream ambition is equally important. The project is expected to produce 105,000 t/yr of precursors and 30,000 t/yr of cathode materials. It also aims to build 20 GWh per year of nickel-based battery capacity. As a result, the Indonesia battery ecosystem project goes well beyond raw material processing.

Battery recycling also appears in the plan. The proposed recycling capacity is capped at 10,000 t/yr. That addition supports a more circular industrial model. Meanwhile, Antam will supply the nickel ore required for the project.

Antam Battery Project Reinforces Indonesia’s Downstream Strategy

The Antam battery project fits directly into Indonesia’s long-term downstream policy. Jakarta wants to build a local battery industry from mining to refining to final battery production. This new agreement supports that goal with another large integrated platform. Therefore, the project has national strategic value, not just commercial relevance.

This also shows Indonesia’s flexibility in partner management. LGES may have exited, but the broader industrial objective did not disappear. Instead, the project has been restructured around a new consortium. As a result, Indonesia continues pushing its battery ambitions despite partner turnover.

Antam’s role is becoming even more central. The company is involved in this project and also has a separate EV battery joint venture with CATL. That CATL-linked venture is expected to start operations by 2026. Consequently, Antam is emerging as one of the key anchors in Indonesia’s nickel battery chain.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This partnership matters because it shows Indonesia’s battery strategy is bigger than any one foreign partner. The country is still determined to convert nickel strength into downstream battery power. If execution improves, Indonesia could become one of the most integrated battery manufacturing hubs outside China.

Japan EU battery recycling alliance aims to cut China dependence

Japan, EU battery alliance

Japan EU battery recycling alliance marks a strategic push to reduce reliance on China in battery materials. The new Japan EU battery recycling alliance brings together key industry groups to strengthen recycling, black mass handling and data sharing. As a result, the Japan EU battery recycling alliance targets a more resilient and transparent battery supply chain across both regions.

Japan EU battery recycling alliance links tech strength and market scale

The Japan EU battery recycling alliance is built around three core industry associations. Japan’s Battery Association for Supply Chain, the European Battery Alliance and Brussels based Recharge have signed an initial agreement. Together, they will cooperate on improving recycling processes, materials flows and supply chain governance.

The agreement covers information exchange on issues such as data sharing and regulatory interpretation. It also includes joint studies on black mass classification, a key bottleneck for cross border recycling flows. Black mass refers to shredded cathode material containing nickel, cobalt and lithium from spent batteries. Therefore, clear definitions and standards for black mass are critical for trade, permitting and ESG compliance.

Japanese officials highlight the importance of combining Japan’s technology strength with Europe’s market size. Japan offers advanced recycling technologies and process know how developed over decades of battery manufacturing. Meanwhile, Europe provides a rapidly growing battery market driven by EV mandates and energy storage deployment. This mix gives the Japan EU battery recycling alliance strong industrial foundations.

Reducing strategic exposure to China dominated battery materials

The Japan EU battery recycling alliance clearly responds to geopolitical supply concerns. Officials from Japan’s trade and industry ministry note that the current battery supply chain depends heavily on one country. Although unnamed, the reference clearly points to China’s dominance in processed lithium, nickel, cobalt and anode materials.

By deepening cooperation, Tokyo and Brussels aim to reduce vulnerability to export controls or political friction. Recycling and black mass trade can partially offset primary supply risks from Chinese refineries and processors. In addition, improved data sharing should help track origin, quality and ESG performance of recovered materials. As a result, the Japan EU battery recycling alliance supports compliance with emerging battery passport and due diligence rules.

The initiative also fits within the broader Japan EU competitiveness alliance launched in July. That framework seeks closer coordination on semiconductors, clean energy, critical minerals and industrial standards. Battery recycling now becomes a visible test case for how quickly the partnership can move from statements to practical projects.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This partnership underlines how recycling is moving from a niche activity to a core pillar of battery security strategy. If the Japan EU battery recycling alliance can harmonise black mass standards and data systems, it will lower barriers for serious cross regional recycling investment. Market participants should watch for pilot projects, joint ventures and regulatory tweaks that follow this initial, largely framework level agreement.

China Battery Overcapacity Crackdown Targets Price Wars and Overseas Expansion

China Battery

China battery overcapacity concerns deepened after government authorities held another meeting with leading power and energy storage battery producers on 9 April. The meeting signalled stronger regulatory pressure on disorderly competition, low-price strategies and excessive capacity expansion in the lithium battery sector.

The meeting brought together 16 major battery producers and several industry associations. It was the second such regulatory session since January, showing that Beijing sees battery overcapacity as a structural industrial risk rather than a short-term market adjustment.

China battery overcapacity has grown as domestic and overseas capacity plans have moved far ahead of actual demand. Regulators are now seeking capacity early-warning mechanisms, stronger market-order controls and tighter oversight of aggressive price competition.

Regulators Target Involution-Style Competition

Chinese authorities said the meeting aimed to implement senior government directives against “involution-style” competition. This term refers to excessive internal rivalry that destroys margins, weakens investment discipline and creates unsustainable price wars.

Regulators also discussed a negative list of irrational competitive practices in the power and energy storage battery industry. This would give authorities a clearer tool to identify and restrict behaviour that destabilises the market.

The new focus on the “externalisation of involution” is especially important. It shows that Beijing is now concerned not only about domestic overcapacity, but also about excessive overseas expansion by Chinese battery producers.

Chinese battery companies have accelerated global plant construction to serve overseas demand and reduce exposure to geopolitical restrictions. But if too much capacity is exported abroad, price pressure could spread into global power battery and energy storage markets.

Capacity Mismatch Creates Pressure Across Battery Materials

China’s power and energy storage battery output reached 1,755.6GWh in 2025, up 60.1% from a year earlier. Sales rose by 63.6% to 1,700.5GWh, confirming strong demand growth but also exposing the scale of capacity pressure.

Planned national capacity has climbed close to 5,000GWh. That implies utilisation rates below 40%, which helps explain why regulators are concerned about price wars and weak production discipline.

The issue also matters for battery materials. Overcapacity can pressure cathode active materials, precursors, lithium carbonate, graphite, copper foil, separators and electrolytes if producers chase volumes rather than margins.

Chinese battery firms are also becoming more important abroad. CATL, BYD, Gotion High-Tech, Farasis Energy, SVOLT Energy and CALB recorded 218GWh of overseas power battery installations in 2025, accounting for 47.2% of the global market.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China’s battery crackdown shows that scale alone is no longer enough. The next phase of battery competition will reward disciplined capacity, stronger technology, regional supply-chain positioning and healthier margins over pure volume growth.

Global Battery Demand Nears 1TWh in 2024 as LFP Market Share Surges

Battery

EV Growth and China Lead Surge in Battery Demand

Global battery demand reached nearly 1TWh in 2024, largely driven by rising electric vehicle (EV) adoption, according to the IEA's latest EV Outlook 2025. The Focus Keyphrase "global battery demand" continues to dominate energy transition narratives as EV sales accelerate across major economies.

EV battery demand alone exceeded 950GWh, accounting for more than 85% of total battery consumption. China led with 59% of EV battery demand, followed by the U.S. and EU, each holding a 13% share. The IEA projects battery demand will more than triple to over 3TWh by 2030 under current national policies. While supply of critical minerals is currently in surplus, the IEA warns that depressed prices could deter future investment, risking lithium and nickel shortages by decade’s end.

Battery Manufacturing Grows Faster Than Demand

Global battery manufacturing capacity grew by nearly 30% to 3.3TWh in 2024, tripling actual demand. If all announced projects proceed, capacity could reach 6.5TWh by 2030, outpacing the IEA’s projected demand.

South Korea led overseas battery capacity expansion with over 400GWh deployed in 2024, far ahead of Japan (60GWh) and China (30GWh). If planned projects materialize, South Korea could produce over 1TWh annually by 2030, almost double China’s expected output. As a result, China’s global manufacturing share is projected to fall from 85% in 2024 to two-thirds by 2030, diversifying global supply chains.

LFP Dominates Market as Regional Dynamics Shift

Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries now make up nearly half of the global EV battery market, with Chinese producers holding a de facto monopoly, especially in Europe and the U.S. European OEMs are increasingly opting for LFP chemistries to cut costs, displacing South Korean suppliers.

South Korean battery makers’ EU market share fell to 60% in 2024, down from 80% in 2022, while their U.S. market share rose to 35%, closing in on Japan’s 48%. Major Korean firms — LG Energy Solution, SK On, Samsung SDI — are all preparing for mass LFP production to compete in this fast-growing segment.

Meanwhile, LFP adoption in Southeast Asia, Brazil, and India has surpassed 50% of battery electric car sales, signaling rapid global penetration. However, Japanese battery makers face domestic setbacks, highlighted by Nissan’s cancellation of its Kyushu LFP plant amid restructuring.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The rise in global battery demand underscores a structural transformation in energy, mobility, and manufacturing. While demand growth is robust, the oversupply of battery capacity and volatility in mineral prices highlight the sector’s growing pains. As LFP continues its global ascent, regional competition and vertical integration will shape the future of the battery ecosystem.

Rio Tinto battery swap trial advances low-emission mining

Rio Tinto Battery swap

Rio Tinto battery swap trial at Oyu Tolgoi signals a step-change in low-emission surface mining. The Rio Tinto battery swap trial, launched with China’s SPIC Qiyuan, will test electric haul trucks in demanding operating conditions. As a result, the Rio Tinto battery swap trial could become a blueprint for fleet decarbonisation across global open-pit operations.

Battery swap technology at Oyu Tolgoi

The Rio Tinto battery swap trial introduces electric haul trucks that can change batteries in under seven minutes. Battery swapping avoids long fast-charging pauses and keeps haul trucks in near-continuous operation. Over the past year, Rio Tinto and SPIC Qiyuan deployed eight 91t Tonly trucks, 13 800kWh batteries and a swap station. This infrastructure also includes a static charger and supporting grid connections at the Mongolian copper mine.

The trial will initially support tailings dam construction and topsoil movements at Oyu Tolgoi. These tasks provide repeatable cycles that are ideal for testing battery performance and swap logistics. Meanwhile, the project will generate real-world data on duty cycles, energy use and maintenance needs. That data will be critical for scaling battery swap systems into harsher and deeper mining environments.

Scaling battery swap across Rio Tinto’s global truck fleet

Rio Tinto sees its 700-truck global fleet as a major opportunity for wider battery swap deployment. If successful, the Rio Tinto battery swap trial could enable progressive replacement of diesel trucks in high-volume pits. Battery swap systems also align with grid-connected power strategies at large copper and iron ore operations. However, scaling will depend on local power availability, grid stability and renewable energy penetration.

Partnership with SPIC Qiyuan gives Rio Tinto access to China’s fast-moving battery and power electronics ecosystem. Chinese suppliers have already commercialised battery swap technology in logistics and urban transport fleets. Therefore, this mining-focused collaboration may accelerate standardisation of battery packs, swap stations and digital control platforms. That standardisation would reduce costs and support adoption by other global mining companies.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This trial confirms that decarbonising mining fleets is shifting from concept studies to large-scale pilots. Battery swap technology addresses one of mining’s hardest problems: keeping heavy haulage electrified without sacrificing productivity. If Oyu Tolgoi proves the model, expect copycat projects in copper, iron ore and coal, especially where grid power and renewables are available.

Gotion Slovakia battery plant anchors new EU battery supply hub

Gotion Slovakia battery plant

Gotion Slovakia battery plant construction has begun, marking a major step in Europe’s race for local EV cell capacity. The Gotion Slovakia battery plant will be the country’s first gigafactory and a key node in China–EU battery supply chains. As a result, the Gotion Slovakia battery plant positions Slovakia as a new player in Europe’s electrification map.

Gotion Slovakia battery plant targets EU gigafactory scale

The first phase of the Gotion Slovakia battery plant will add 20GWh a year of lithium-ion capacity. Gotion plans pilot production in 2026, with commercial volumes starting in 2027 and feeding customers across EU markets. This timing aligns with accelerating European EV and energy storage demand, as automakers seek diversified cell suppliers.

Meanwhile, the Surany facility will be Slovakia’s first battery gigafactory, strengthening Central Europe’s role as an automotive manufacturing corridor. Products will likely support both passenger EVs and stationary storage, given Gotion’s broad lithium-ion portfolio. Therefore, OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers in the EU gain another large-scale, non-European cell source inside the single market.

Chinese battery makers accelerate overseas footprint

Gotion has rapidly expanded outside China, with projects in Morocco, Thailand, Japan and the US adding to 20 global plants. The company targets 300GWh a year of installed capacity by 2025, including 100GWh outside China, to serve regionalised EV supply chains. However, its planned Michigan cathode and anode plant was cancelled after policy disagreements with local authorities.

As a result, Europe and emerging markets now absorb more of Gotion’s outbound investment as geopolitical trade risks rise. Chinese battery makers are building overseas to diversify customers, reduce tariff exposure and align with “local-for-local” industrial policies. These projects also hedge against potential future export controls on advanced battery materials and equipment.

Export controls delayed but policy risk remains

China has postponed planned export restrictions on certain high-end lithium batteries, key equipment, cathode materials and artificial graphite. The one-year delay followed talks between Xi Jinping and Donald Trump and removes an immediate brake on Chinese firms’ overseas expansion. However, the episode underscores how quickly regulation can reshape the global battery value chain.

In the near term, Gotion and its peers gain critical time to lock in projects and qualify products with Western OEMs. Longer term, governments may still tighten controls around strategic battery technologies and materials. Therefore, assets like the Gotion Slovakia battery plant will be increasingly valued for their on-shore, policy-resilient capacity.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Gotion’s Slovakia project is another sign that gigafactory competition is shifting from pure cost to geopolitical resilience. For European automakers, Chinese-backed plants inside the EU offer cost-effective capacity but deepen strategic interdependence. The next question is whether Brussels and national governments will pair such investments with stronger upstream and recycling policies to secure the full battery value chain.

XFH Anode Material Sales Rise as China Battery Demand Expands

Anode Material

XFH anode material sales increased in 2025 as demand from China’s lithium-ion power battery and energy storage battery industries continued to grow. Shanghai XFH Technology sold 83,885t of anode materials during the year, up 22% from 2024.

XFH anode material sales outpaced production growth, showing stronger downstream offtake from battery manufacturers. The company’s anode material output rose by 11% on the year to 83,426t.

XFH anode material sales also lifted revenue. The company’s anode material revenue rose by 21% to 1.7bn yuan, supported by higher shipment volumes into battery supply chains.

The result reflects continued expansion in China’s battery ecosystem. Power battery shipments exceeded 1,000GWh in 2025, up by more than 50% from a year earlier, while energy storage battery shipments rose by 85% to 630GWh.

Suining Complex Expands XFH’s Anode Capacity

XFH increased anode material production capacity to 114,660 t/yr in 2025, up 27% from the previous year. The increase followed the production launch of its 60,000 t/yr complex in Suining, Sichuan province, at the end of 2025.

The new capacity gives XFH more room to serve fast-growing battery demand. Anode materials are a core input for lithium-ion batteries, influencing charging performance, cycle life, safety and energy density.

China’s rapid growth in power batteries and storage batteries is driving expansion across the anode supply chain. Producers are adding capacity to meet demand from electric vehicles, grid storage, industrial storage systems and consumer battery applications.

The Suining project also strengthens XFH’s position in a market where scale, cost control and customer qualification are critical. Larger capacity can improve operating efficiency, but it also requires stable demand to avoid inventory and pricing pressure.

Energy Storage Growth Supports Anode Demand

Energy storage is becoming an increasingly important driver for China anode materials. Storage battery shipments grew faster than power batteries in 2025, rising by 85% from a year earlier.

This matters because energy storage systems require large volumes of battery materials even when they have different performance priorities from electric vehicles. Cost, cycle life, safety and supply reliability are especially important in storage applications.

Power battery demand remains the largest driver. China’s battery shipments above 1,000GWh show the scale of the domestic EV and battery manufacturing base.

For anode producers, the opportunity is large but competitive. Demand growth supports shipments, but capacity expansion across China can still create margin pressure if supply grows faster than customer orders.

XFH’s stronger sales and output show that qualified anode producers remain tied closely to downstream battery expansion. The next challenge will be maintaining utilisation and profitability as China’s battery materials sector continues to scale.

The Metalnomist Commentary

XFH’s growth shows that China’s battery materials chain is still expanding quickly, especially in anodes. However, rising capacity means producers must compete on qualification, cost and customer access, not only shipment growth.

Lithium-Ion Battery Copper Foil Shipments Surge as Ultra-Thin Products Gain Share

Copper Foil

Lithium-ion battery copper foil shipments rose sharply in 2025 as global battery production expanded and manufacturers shifted toward thinner materials to reduce copper costs. Global shipments reached 1.302mn t, up 41.7% from 2024, according to Chinese research institute EV Tank.

Lithium-ion battery copper foil demand remains closely tied to electric vehicle and energy storage growth. Copper foil is a key current collector in lithium-ion batteries, making it essential to cell performance, energy density and manufacturing cost.

Lithium-ion battery copper foil shipments were dominated by China, which accounted for 82.9% of global deliveries in 2025. EV Tank expects global shipments to reach 2.615mn t by 2030, implying continued expansion as battery output scales.

The product mix changed quickly during the year. The share of 8μm foil declined, while 6μm remained the mainstream product and accounted for more than 70% of total shipments.

Ultra-Thin Foil Gains Momentum on Copper Cost Pressure

Ultra-thin copper foil gained share as battery producers looked for ways to reduce copper input costs. Persistently high global copper prices pushed cell manufacturers to use thinner foil while maintaining battery performance.

The combined share of 5μm and 4.5μm ultra-thin foil rose to 24% in 2025. This is a major shift for a material category that requires tighter production control, better surface quality and stronger consistency.

Thinner copper foil can help reduce battery weight and improve energy density. It also lowers the amount of copper used per cell, which becomes increasingly important when copper prices remain elevated.

EV Tank expects 5μm and thinner foil to become a key material for high-end batteries. This reflects the industry’s move toward lighter, higher-energy-density cell designs.

However, thinner foil also raises manufacturing difficulty. Producers must control pinholes, tensile strength, elongation, surface roughness and coating compatibility more precisely.

That technical barrier could separate higher-end suppliers from lower-cost producers. As battery customers shift toward thinner grades, qualification and process reliability will become more important than simple capacity.

China Leads Supply as Competition Intensifies

China’s 82.9% share of global shipments shows its dominant role in battery copper foil supply. The country has built large-scale capacity around its lithium-ion battery ecosystem, supported by domestic EV, energy storage and cell manufacturing growth.

Competition intensified in 2025 as the market recovered and producers brought earlier-built capacity on line. This created a more fluid ranking among suppliers.

Longdian Wason ranked first with a 12.2% market share. Huachuang New Material followed after capacity ramp-ups lifted output and sales.

Defu Technology and Jiayuan Technology ranked third and fourth, respectively. Seven companies in the top 10 changed positions during the year, showing how quickly capacity, customer access and product mix are reshaping the sector.

Battery makers also increased procurement from second-tier suppliers to improve supply stability. This suggests buyers are trying to diversify supplier bases rather than rely only on leading producers.

For copper markets, the trend is strategically important. Battery copper foil growth creates a direct link between copper demand and battery technology. But the move toward ultra-thin foil also means battery growth will not translate into copper demand on a simple one-to-one basis.

The sector is therefore entering a more technical phase. Volume growth remains strong, but material intensity, foil thickness, supplier qualification and copper price pressure will all shape future demand.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The copper foil market shows how battery growth can lift copper demand while also forcing material thrift. High copper prices are pushing battery makers toward thinner foil, making technology and process control as important as raw capacity.

Battery Metals Demand Faces Slower Path as Hybrid Vehicle Growth Extends

Battery Metals

Battery metals demand could face a slower growth path as carmakers and suppliers expect hybrids and range extenders to remain important for longer than earlier electric-only transition models assumed. Speakers at the FT Future of the Car summit said vehicle decarbonisation should be measured by emissions reduction, not only battery electric vehicle share.

Battery metals demand remains structurally supported by electrification. However, a longer hybrid phase could reduce near-term demand intensity for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese because hybrid vehicles use smaller battery packs than full battery electric vehicles.

Battery metals demand assumptions are therefore becoming more complex. Automotive electrification is still progressing, but the industry is moving toward a mixed powertrain future rather than a simple shift from combustion engines to full BEVs.

Horse Powertrain chief executive Matias Giannini said half of passenger vehicles could still be produced with some form of combustion or hybrid powertrain by 2040. That outlook would keep investment flowing into efficient hybrid systems alongside EV platforms.

Hybrid Growth Changes the Battery Raw Materials Curve

Hybrid vehicle growth could temper the pace of battery raw material demand without reversing electrification. Hybrids and range extenders still require electric motors, inverters, wiring and batteries, but their battery packs are much smaller than those used in BEVs.

This matters most for nickel. High-nickel NCM and NCA batteries are closely tied to longer-range BEVs, where larger packs are needed to deliver performance and driving range.

A slower BEV ramp-up could delay some of the nickel sulphate demand growth that has supported investment cases for new battery-grade nickel projects. It could also affect cobalt and manganese demand in cathode chemistries exposed to full EV penetration rates.

Lithium remains supported across almost every electrification pathway. Still, a longer hybrid transition could slow the rate at which large-format BEV batteries absorb lithium units.

The shift does not mean automotive metals demand will weaken across the board. Hybrids use more copper than conventional combustion vehicles because they require electric motors, power electronics and more complex wiring systems.

Continued hybrid and combustion production also supports aluminium castings, stainless steel, exhaust components and engine-related materials. Meanwhile, BEV growth still supports aluminium lightweighting, copper wiring, charging infrastructure and battery materials.

The result is a less linear automotive metals outlook. Battery metals may grow more slowly than aggressive BEV scenarios suggest, while broader automotive metals consumption remains supported by platform complexity and mixed powertrain production.

Policy Flexibility Could Reshape European Metal Demand

European suppliers are pushing for more flexibility in the EU regulatory framework. Current policy remains heavily weighted toward full electrification through tailpipe emissions targets.

The EU targets a 100% reduction in tailpipe emissions from new cars and vans from 2035. That effectively ends new combustion engine sales unless future exemptions are created.

Industry participants increasingly want a more technology-neutral route. They argue that hybrids, range extenders, renewable fuels and lower-carbon manufacturing should contribute to emissions reduction alongside BEVs.

This policy debate matters for metals. Battery material demand depends heavily on BEV penetration, average pack size and chemistry choice.

If Europe allows a longer role for hybrids and range extenders, lithium-ion battery capacity demand per vehicle could grow more slowly. That would affect demand forecasts for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese.

Chinese EV and hybrid technology is also improving quickly. This puts pressure on European and US automakers to share development costs across BEV, hybrid and range-extender platforms.

For suppliers, the strategic issue is flexibility. Companies tied only to high-growth BEV battery assumptions may face demand timing risk, while suppliers serving copper, aluminium, stainless steel, electronics and hybrid systems may benefit from a broader platform mix.

The automotive transition is still real, but the material demand path is becoming more diversified. Metals markets must now track powertrain mix, not only EV sales headlines.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Hybrid growth does not weaken the energy transition, but it changes the metals timing. Battery metals demand will still rise, yet copper, aluminium and hybrid-related materials may capture more value if automakers choose a longer mixed-powertrain route.

Panasonic Reports Increased Profits in Q3 2024, Driven by Storage Battery Demand and AI Growth

Panasonic

Japanese Battery Maker Sees Strong Performance in Automotive and Storage Battery Segments Amid Growing AI Demand

Panasonic, a leading Japanese battery producer, reported a notable increase in profits for the third fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2024. The company posted a profit of ¥132.2 billion ($862 million), marking a 15% rise compared to the same period last year. This growth was primarily driven by stronger sales of its storage battery systems, especially to data centers, fueled by the rising adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.

Growth in Storage Battery Sales and AI Demand

Panasonic’s strong performance in the storage battery segment reflects the growing demand for energy storage solutions, particularly for data centers. The company did not disclose specific sales volumes but highlighted that AI's rapid growth has significantly contributed to increased sales of its storage battery systems. This aligns with global trends, where AI's demands for high-performance computing infrastructure are pushing data centers to invest in more efficient energy solutions.

In response to the strong growth in the storage battery sector, Panasonic has revised its full-year outlook. The company raised its profit forecast for its battery segment by ¥15 billion, now projecting ¥124 billion for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025. Panasonic expects the demand for storage batteries driven by AI technologies to continue, further enhancing its financial outlook.

Automotive Battery Sales and US Production Facilities

Panasonic's automotive battery business also saw a significant boost, with profits increasing by ¥2.6 billion compared to the previous year. This growth was attributed to higher battery shipments from its Nevada plant in the United States, where improved productivity has helped meet the rising demand for batteries in electric vehicles (EVs). The company’s investments in new battery production facilities in Kansas and Japan’s Wakayama prefecture helped offset initial investment costs.

Despite the potential impact of recent US tariff hikes on imports from Canada and Mexico, Panasonic anticipates minimal disruption to its operations. The company emphasized that its major battery production bases, including those in Kansas, are located within the US, which should shield it from significant negative effects from these tariffs.

Confidence in the Global EV Market

Looking ahead, Panasonic remains confident in the global EV market's growth, despite potential slowdowns in certain regions. The company believes that the overall expansion of the electric vehicle market will continue, regardless of fluctuations in growth rates. Panasonic's strategy of investing in battery production only in response to confirmed client demand ensures that the company will likely achieve a solid return on its investments, positioning it well for future growth.

In conclusion, Panasonic’s impressive performance in Q3 2024 underscores its strong position in the battery industry. With a robust outlook for storage batteries driven by AI and sustained growth in its automotive battery sector, Panasonic is poised for continued success.

Toyota Tsusho PPESNA Stake Strengthens North American Battery Supply Chain

Toyota Tsusho

Toyota Tsusho PPESNA stake acquisition gives the Japanese trading firm a stronger role in building Toyota Group’s North American battery supply chain. The company acquired a 20% stake in Prime Planet Energy and Solutions’ North American subsidiary, PPESNA.

The Toyota Tsusho PPESNA stake is designed to support stable battery production across procurement, materials, components, production equipment and recycling. The move shows how Japanese industrial groups are deepening control over regional battery supply chains as North American electrification investment expands.

PPESNA was established in September 2025 to improve service and response capabilities for PPES customers and Toyota Group’s battery business in North America. Toyota Tsusho’s investment gives the subsidiary a broader commercial and supply-chain platform.

Toyota Tsusho Targets Battery Procurement and Recycling Integration

Toyota Tsusho said the investment will help develop a supply chain covering equipment procurement, battery materials, components and recycling. This is important because battery production increasingly depends on coordinated sourcing across cathode materials, anode materials, separators, electrolytes, cells, modules and recycling routes.

The company already has exposure to Toyota Battery Manufacturing North Carolina, which can produce 30GWh/yr of batteries at full capacity. That gives Toyota Tsusho a direct link to one of Toyota Group’s key North American battery manufacturing assets.

The Toyota Tsusho PPESNA stake also complements the company’s recycling strategy. Toyota Tsusho has established a joint venture with LG Energy Solution to recycle batteries in North Carolina, giving it another position in the circular battery materials chain.

North America Becomes a Strategic Battery Manufacturing Base

North America is becoming a core region for Japanese battery supply-chain investment. Automakers and trading houses are trying to localise procurement, reduce logistics risk and prepare for tighter regional content requirements.

Toyota Tsusho’s role is especially important because trading companies often connect raw materials, equipment suppliers, manufacturers and recyclers. In battery supply chains, that coordination can reduce bottlenecks and improve long-term production stability.

For Toyota Group, the PPESNA investment supports a more integrated North American platform. It links battery production, upstream procurement and recycling at a time when battery costs, material security and regional manufacturing incentives remain central to electric vehicle competitiveness.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Toyota Tsusho’s PPESNA investment shows that battery competitiveness is moving beyond cell production alone. The real advantage will come from controlling the full supply chain, from equipment and materials procurement to recycling and closed-loop recovery.

Global Solid-State Electrolyte Shipments Surge as Semi-Solid Batteries Scale

Solid state electrolyte

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments are rising rapidly as semi-solid batteries move toward vehicle adoption and full solid-state battery commercialisation advances. Chinese research institute EV Tank said shipments reached 4,100t in 2025, more than doubling from a year earlier.

The increase marks an important early-stage signal for the battery materials industry. Electrolytes are one of the core materials that determine the energy density, safety and commercial viability of solid-state batteries.

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments are still small compared with conventional lithium-ion battery materials. However, the growth rate shows that downstream producers are beginning to prepare for larger semi-solid and solid-state battery output.

EV Tank expects global solid-state electrolyte shipments to reach 229,000t by 2030. That would imply a compound annual growth rate of more than 120% from 2025 to 2030, making electrolytes one of the fastest-growing segments in advanced battery materials.

The forecast reflects both technological progress and industrial positioning. Battery producers, automakers and materials companies are now investing ahead of expected demand from electric vehicles, energy storage systems and high-end electronics.

Semi-Solid Batteries Create the First Commercial Demand Base

Semi-solid batteries are likely to provide the first meaningful demand base for solid-state battery electrolytes. EV Tank expects these batteries to begin vehicle adoption from 2026, ahead of full solid-state battery mass production.

This timing matters because semi-solid batteries can act as a bridge technology. They offer improved safety and performance compared with conventional liquid-electrolyte batteries, while avoiding some of the most difficult technical barriers facing all-solid-state cells.

Semi-solid battery growth is already supporting electrolyte shipments. These products still use electrolyte systems that may differ from fully solid-state designs, but they create early commercial demand for sulphide, oxide, polymer, halide and composite electrolyte materials.

Full solid-state batteries are expected to enter small-scale mass production from 2027. That stage will likely remain limited at first because large-scale production still faces technical, cost and qualification challenges.

The market therefore looks likely to develop in phases. Semi-solid batteries will drive early electrolyte consumption, while full solid-state batteries will gradually expand once production processes, interfaces and reliability improve.

Electrolytes are central to this transition. They influence ion conductivity, safety, cycle life, energy density and compatibility with electrodes. Any weakness in electrolyte performance can limit the entire battery system.

This is why electrolyte development is becoming a strategic battleground. Battery makers cannot scale solid-state technology only by changing cell design. They need stable, high-quality electrolyte materials that can be produced consistently at industrial scale.

Capacity expansion is accelerating in response. EV Tank expects producers with annual electrolyte capacity at the thousand-tonne level to emerge within the next one to two years.

That would mark a shift from laboratory and pilot-scale material production toward early industrial supply. It would also create a more competitive market among electrolyte producers seeking qualification with battery manufacturers.

For battery materials suppliers, this creates a new growth category. Electrolytes may become a higher-value segment within the battery chain, especially if producers can meet strict requirements for purity, particle control, stability and conductivity.

For automakers, the key issue is reliability. Vehicle adoption requires materials that can perform under harsh cycling, temperature and safety conditions. This means electrolyte suppliers must pass long qualification cycles before volume demand can fully develop.

Technology Routes and Cost Cuts Shape the Scale-Up

Solid-state battery electrolyte technology remains diversified, especially in semi-solid batteries. Sulphide, oxide, polymer and halide routes are developing in parallel, while both single-electrolyte and composite-electrolyte solutions are being adopted.

This diversity shows that the industry has not yet settled on a single dominant material route. Different technologies offer different advantages in conductivity, stability, manufacturability, cost and safety.

Sulphide electrolytes currently dominate the roadmap for full solid-state batteries. They offer high ionic conductivity and are widely viewed as one of the most promising routes for high-performance battery cells.

However, sulphide systems also face challenges. They require careful handling, moisture control and interface engineering. These factors can raise production complexity and slow commercial scale-up.

Oxide electrolytes offer strong chemical and thermal stability, but they can face processing and interface resistance challenges. Polymer electrolytes offer manufacturing flexibility, but often struggle with conductivity at room temperature. Halide electrolytes are gaining interest because of their electrochemical stability and potential compatibility with high-voltage cathodes.

Composite electrolyte solutions may become increasingly important. By combining material systems, producers can try to balance conductivity, flexibility, stability and manufacturability.

Cost reduction is also becoming a major commercial driver. EV Tank said improvements in material quality and production processes lowered costs across several technology routes in 2025.

Sulphide electrolyte costs fell by more than 35% during the year. This is significant because cost remains one of the biggest obstacles to wider solid-state battery adoption.

Lower electrolyte costs improve the competitiveness of solid-state batteries against conventional lithium-ion technologies. They also make it easier for battery makers to test commercial deployment in premium vehicles, high-performance energy storage and other demanding applications.

Still, cost reduction alone will not guarantee rapid commercialisation. The industry must also solve interface stability, dendrite control, manufacturing yield, pressure management and long-term cycle reliability.

This explains why some major automakers remain cautious. BYD chief scientist Lian Yubo has said solid-state batteries still face core technical bottlenecks and that liquid and solid-state batteries should develop as complementary technologies.

Great Wall Motor also does not expect large-scale commercialisation of all-solid-state batteries in the near term. This caution suggests that the market may grow strongly, but unevenly.

The commercial pathway is therefore not a simple replacement of liquid batteries. Conventional lithium-ion batteries, semi-solid batteries and full solid-state batteries are likely to coexist for years, each serving different cost and performance segments.

This has important implications for materials demand. Solid-state growth could increase demand for lithium metal, high-nickel cathodes, sulphur-based materials, oxides, halides and specialty chemical precursors. But it may not immediately reduce demand for conventional electrolytes, separators or liquid battery components.

The forecast of 229,000t of global solid-state electrolyte shipments by 2030 points to a large materials opportunity. But the final market size will depend on how quickly automakers adopt semi-solid batteries and how successfully full solid-state batteries move from demonstration to reliable mass production.

For supply chains, qualification will be decisive. Battery makers will not buy electrolyte materials only because capacity exists. They will need stable quality, competitive pricing, proven performance and reliable long-term supply.

For policymakers, solid-state batteries are increasingly tied to advanced manufacturing and energy security. Countries that control electrolyte technology and battery production could gain strategic advantage in next-generation electric vehicles and storage systems.

For the metals market, the key point is that battery innovation changes materials demand before full commercial adoption arrives. Producers begin scaling supply years before the technology reaches mass-market vehicles, creating early demand signals and investment cycles.

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments therefore offer a useful indicator of where advanced battery manufacturing is moving. The numbers remain small, but the growth curve is steep enough to attract capital, competition and supply-chain restructuring.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Solid-state electrolyte growth shows that next-generation battery competition is moving upstream into materials engineering. The market will expand quickly, but full solid-state batteries still need technical proof before they can reshape EV and energy storage supply chains at scale.

SoftBank Osaka Battery Production Targets AI Data Centre Energy Demand

SoftBank

SoftBank Osaka battery production plans will add a new Japanese platform for next-generation battery cells and battery energy storage systems. The company aims to start production at its GX Factory in Osaka by March 2028.

SoftBank Osaka battery production will focus partly on zinc-halogen battery technology developed with South Korea’s COSMOS Lab. The partners aim to begin mass production during the April 2027-March 2028 fiscal year.

SoftBank Osaka battery production is strategically linked to rising electricity demand from artificial intelligence infrastructure. As AI data centres expand, operators need safer, scalable and more resilient energy storage systems to support grid stability and power management.

The GX Factory is part of SoftBank’s planned AI data centre development at Sakai in Osaka prefecture, on a site formerly owned by Sharp. The wider project also includes the AX Factory, which will focus on AI data centre operations and infrastructure hardware manufacturing.

Zinc-Halogen Technology Targets Safety and Local Supply

SoftBank is positioning zinc-halogen batteries as a safer alternative to lithium-ion systems. The company said the technology removes lithium-ion fire risk by using a halogen-based cathode material, zinc anode and water-based electrolyte.

This chemistry also supports supply-chain resilience. Zinc and halides are available in Japan, reducing exposure to imported lithium, nickel, cobalt or graphite supply chains.

That matters because energy storage is becoming more strategically important as AI data centres, renewable power and grid balancing needs grow together. Battery systems must be safe, affordable and scalable.

Zinc-halogen batteries may be especially relevant for stationary storage, where safety, durability and material availability can matter more than maximum energy density.

SoftBank’s plan shows that AI infrastructure is beginning to shape battery demand beyond electric vehicles. Data centres require large and reliable power systems, and that could create a new demand channel for non-lithium battery chemistries.

BESS Manufacturing Adds Industrial Scale Ambition

SoftBank will also partner with South Korea’s DeltaX to develop and manufacture high-energy-density battery energy storage systems. The partnership will use DeltaX’s cell-connecting system design and cell-to-pack technology.

SoftBank aims to reach 1 GWh/yr of BESS mass production by the 2028-29 fiscal year. That would give the company a meaningful platform for grid, industrial and data-centre storage customers.

The company plans to expand sales into grid-storage, industrial and residential applications. It is also considering overseas markets in the medium term.

SoftBank wants the battery business to generate more than ¥100bn in annual revenue by the 2030-31 fiscal year. That target shows the company sees batteries as an infrastructure business, not only a technology experiment.

For Japan, the project strengthens domestic battery manufacturing around AI infrastructure and energy security. It also diversifies battery chemistry development beyond the lithium-ion supply chain.

The industrial implication is clear. As AI power demand accelerates, battery storage will become a strategic layer between data centres, grids and renewable energy supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

SoftBank’s Osaka plan shows that AI infrastructure is now pulling battery innovation in a new direction. Zinc-halogen technology may not replace lithium-ion in vehicles, but it could become strategically important for safer, locally sourced stationary storage.

NextEra Battery Storage Contracts Rise as US Power Demand Accelerates

NextEra Energy

NextEra battery storage contracts increased in the first quarter as the US utility group added 1.3GW of battery storage-based agreements. The additions formed part of 4GW of renewable and storage originations, alongside 2.2GW of solar and 0.5GW of wind.

NextEra battery storage contracts are rising because US electricity demand is growing faster and customers need capacity that can be deployed quickly. The company said demand for power is not slowing and that speed to power has become essential.

NextEra battery storage contracts also show how storage is becoming a core grid resource, not only a supplement to solar and wind. Battery systems can support peak demand, improve grid reliability and provide flexible capacity as data centres, electrification and industrial load growth increase pressure on power networks.

The company added more battery storage than in the first quarter of 2025, when it originated 0.9GW of storage within 3.2GW of renewable energy and storage capacity.

Storage Pipeline Supports Fast Grid Capacity Growth

NextEra has identified four main growth routes for battery storage. These include standalone projects, co-located storage at existing renewable sites, storage as a grid solution and expansion of existing projects from four-hour to eight-hour duration.

This is important because storage demand is becoming more diverse. Standalone batteries can provide rapid capacity support, while co-located systems can improve the value of solar and wind generation.

Longer-duration battery expansion is also strategically relevant. Moving from four-hour to eight-hour systems can help utilities manage evening demand peaks, renewable intermittency and grid congestion.

NextEra’s standalone and co-located storage pipeline exceeds 110GW, excluding expansion opportunities. That scale gives the company one of the strongest platforms in the US storage market.

The growth reflects a broader shift in power infrastructure. Utilities and large customers increasingly need fast capacity additions because new gas plants, transmission lines and conventional generation projects often face long development timelines.

Battery storage is not a full replacement for all forms of generation. But it is becoming one of the fastest tools available to respond to near-term power demand growth.

Secured Supply Through 2029 Reduces Execution Risk

NextEra said it has secured domestic supply for solar panels and battery storage through 2029 at competitive prices. This reduces exposure to trade disruption, tariff changes and equipment shortages.

Supply security matters because battery storage projects depend on reliable access to cells, modules, inverters, power conversion systems, transformers and grid interconnection equipment.

South Korean battery manufacturer Samsung SDI signed a deal in March 2025 to supply 6.3GWh of battery energy storage systems to NextEra. That agreement supports the company’s ability to execute projects while demand rises.

For battery materials, the growth of utility-scale storage strengthens demand for lithium, graphite, iron phosphate cathode materials, copper, aluminium and power electronics. LFP batteries are especially important in stationary storage because of cost, safety and cycle-life advantages.

NextEra’s first-quarter profit rose to $2.18bn on sales of $6.7bn, up from $833mn in profit and $6.25bn in sales a year earlier. Stronger financial performance gives the company more room to support its renewables and storage buildout.

The industrial significance is clear. Battery storage is becoming a strategic capacity product for the US power system, especially as electricity demand from data centres, manufacturing and electrification continues to rise.

The Metalnomist Commentary

NextEra’s storage growth shows that batteries are becoming part of the core power infrastructure toolkit. The next constraint will not be customer demand, but whether supply chains, interconnection queues and grid equipment can keep pace.

US Critical Mineral Processing Funding Targets Domestic Battery Supply Chain

Critical Mineral

US critical mineral processing funding is moving into another major round as the Department of Energy prepares to allocate up to $500mn for processing, recycling, and derivative battery manufacturing projects. The funding opportunity is designed to support US-based projects that can strengthen domestic supply of critical minerals and battery materials.

The Department of Energy will target projects that process raw feedstocks, recycle critical materials, or manufacture battery materials and components. The agency specifically identified battery-related materials such as lithium, graphite, nickel, copper, and aluminum among its areas of focus.

US critical mineral processing funding is becoming a central tool in Washington’s effort to reduce dependence on offshore refining and battery material supply chains. The latest funding round also shows that the US is not only focused on mining, but on the midstream capacity needed to convert raw materials into usable industrial inputs.

DOE Funding Pushes Midstream Capacity Beyond Mining

Critical mineral processing remains one of the most difficult gaps in the US battery supply chain. Mining projects can expand raw material availability, but domestic industrial resilience depends on refining, chemical conversion, recycling, and component manufacturing.

The new funding opportunity will support projects that can process critical minerals from raw feedstocks and recycle valuable materials back into the supply chain. This approach reflects the growing importance of black mass, scrap, and secondary materials as strategic inputs for battery production.

DOE battery materials funding also gives policy support to companies working across lithium chemicals, graphite processing, nickel products, copper materials, aluminum inputs, and battery component manufacturing. These segments are essential for electric vehicles, grid storage, defense electrification, and industrial energy systems.

Battery Manufacturing Policy Enters Third Funding Round

The latest funding notice marks the third round in recent years under the DOE’s battery materials processing and battery manufacturing and recycling programs. In September 2024, the agency selected 25 projects to receive more than $3bn to expand domestic battery, component, and critical material supply.

The new $500mn opportunity extends that policy direction. It gives the US another mechanism to move from strategic mineral rhetoric toward physical processing capacity, especially in areas where China still dominates global refining and battery material production.

Applicants must submit non-binding letters of intent by 27 March, with full applications due by 24 April. The timeline signals that the DOE wants near-term project visibility and a faster pipeline of investable domestic capacity.

US critical mineral processing funding will be especially important for companies that can prove commercial readiness, feedstock security, and scalable production. The strongest projects will likely be those that connect raw material access with downstream battery customers and recycling loops.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The US is now treating processing capacity as the real bottleneck in critical minerals security. Funding can accelerate projects, but the strategic test will be whether supported companies can deliver cost-competitive, qualified material at industrial scale.

US Turkey LFP Battery Partnership Targets 7GWh Production by 2027

Our Next Energy

US Turkey LFP battery partnership emerged as Our Next Energy (ONE) contracted Turkish manufacturer Pomega Energy Storage Technologies to produce 7GWh of lithium iron phosphate battery cells. The strategic US Turkey LFP battery collaboration targets 2GWh production in 2026 escalating to 5GWh in 2027, supporting ONE's energy storage solutions for utility, commercial, and industrial customers while bridging manufacturing capacity before domestic US production commences.

Strategic Manufacturing Timeline Bridges International and Domestic Production

US Turkey LFP battery production will focus on ONE's 314Ah LFP battery cells manufactured at Pomega's Ankara facility. The Turkish facility maintains 3GWh installed capacity and currently undergoes qualification for global export markets. This partnership provides immediate manufacturing access while ONE develops its Michigan-based grid battery production line scheduled for 2027 operations.

Meanwhile, the collaboration enables ONE to meet near-term customer demands without delayed market entry. Founder and CEO Mujeeb Ijaz emphasized the partnership's role in supporting customer commitments during the transition to US-based manufacturing capabilities. The phased approach reduces market risks while ensuring continuous supply chain operations across international and domestic facilities.

Turkish Manufacturing Hub Supports Global Battery Supply Chains

However, Pomega's Ankara facility represents Turkey's growing position in global battery manufacturing ecosystems. The facility's 3GWh capacity and export qualification process demonstrate Turkish manufacturing capabilities in advanced energy storage technologies. Turkey's strategic geographic position provides advantageous access to European, Middle Eastern, and Asian markets for battery exports.

Therefore, the partnership leverages Turkey's industrial infrastructure while supporting ONE's expansion strategy across utility-scale energy storage markets. Turkish manufacturing costs and skilled workforce availability create competitive advantages for large-scale battery production. The collaboration also strengthens US-Turkey commercial relationships in critical technology sectors driving clean energy transitions.

Market Positioning for Utility-Scale Energy Storage Growth

Furthermore, the LFP battery production targets utility, commercial, and industrial energy storage applications experiencing rapid market expansion. Lithium iron phosphate technology offers safety and cost advantages compared to alternative battery chemistries, particularly for large-scale stationary storage installations. The 314Ah cell specification aligns with industry requirements for grid-scale energy storage systems.

As a result, ONE's dual-facility strategy positions the company competitively across North American and international markets during the critical 2026-2027 period. The Turkish production capacity provides flexibility while Michigan facility development progresses, ensuring market presence during peak demand growth. This geographic diversification reduces supply chain risks while maximizing market opportunities across multiple regions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

ONE's partnership with Turkish manufacturer Pomega exemplifies how US battery companies strategically leverage international manufacturing partnerships to bridge capacity gaps before domestic production scaling, particularly important as global LFP demand accelerates faster than domestic manufacturing development. The collaboration demonstrates Turkey's emerging role as a strategic manufacturing hub for critical battery technologies, positioning the country advantageously within global energy storage supply chains serving both European and American markets.

Rivian Second-Life Battery Storage Project Links EV Packs to Grid Reliability

Rivian, Redwood

Rivian second-life battery storage is moving into commercial use after the US electric-vehicle maker agreed to deploy repurposed battery packs through Redwood Materials at its Normal manufacturing plant in Illinois. The project will use more than 100 used Rivian battery packs to provide 10 MWh of dispatchable battery energy storage.

The Rivian second-life battery storage project gives retired EV packs a second use before recycling. Redwood Materials will integrate the packs into a Redwood Energy system for on-site use at Rivian’s manufacturing facility.

Rivian second-life battery storage also reflects a wider shift in the battery value chain. Automakers and recyclers are looking for ways to extract more value from battery packs before recovering lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper, aluminium and other materials.

Redwood Turns Used EV Packs Into Stationary Storage

Redwood will receive EV battery packs from Rivian and convert them into a battery energy storage system for the Normal plant. The system will help reduce energy costs and support local grid reliability.

Second-life batteries are useful because EV packs can still retain meaningful capacity after vehicle use. They may no longer meet automotive performance requirements, but they can still serve stationary storage applications.

This creates a bridge between mobility and grid infrastructure. A battery pack can first support vehicle electrification, then provide stationary power, and later enter recycling for critical material recovery.

Redwood receives more than 20 GWh/yr of batteries, giving it a large feedstock base for both reuse and recycling. The company said it can deploy BESS projects in as little as six months, which matters as power demand rises quickly.

Data Center Power Demand Raises Storage Value

Rivian has attracted investors such as Google, which are seeking faster access to power solutions for artificial intelligence data center growth. This connection shows why second-life batteries are becoming more strategically relevant.

AI data centers need reliable, flexible and rapidly deployable power. Battery energy storage systems can help manage peak demand, improve resilience and reduce pressure on grids facing new large-load connections.

Repurposed EV batteries could become a lower-cost option where speed matters more than maximum energy density. They may also reduce waste and delay the need for immediate material recycling.

For the metals supply chain, this creates a more circular model. Battery materials stay in productive use longer, while recyclers build stronger long-term access to end-of-life packs and future recovered metals.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Rivian and Redwood are showing how EV batteries can become grid assets before they become recycling feedstock. The strategic value lies in extending battery life, lowering storage costs and securing future material recovery in one integrated loop.