EU Steel Demand Faces CBAM Risk Before 2028 Downstream Extension

EU Steel

EU steel demand could face significant pressure between 2026 and 2028 as carbon border adjustment costs apply to steel before they fully extend to downstream steel-consuming goods. European market participants warn that this timing gap could encourage imports of finished steel derivatives and weaken demand for EU-made steel.

The risk comes from the structure of CBAM implementation. Steel products will carry annual CBAM-related mark-ups before many downstream products are covered. As a result, imported finished goods with high steel content could become more competitive than goods manufactured inside the EU using CBAM-exposed steel.

EU steel demand is therefore exposed to a policy mismatch. CBAM aims to protect European industry from carbon leakage, but an uneven rollout could shift pressure from steel imports to finished product imports. That would create a new competitiveness problem for service centres, distributors, fabricators, machinery producers, vehicle parts makers, and appliance manufacturers.

Downstream Imports Could Undermine European Steel Consumption

Downstream steel-consuming goods are becoming a central concern for European industry. Product categories under discussion include car parts, specialised vehicle components, home appliances, machinery parts, and yellow goods. These sectors consume large volumes of steel and play a major role in sustaining regional industrial demand.

A proposed response is to create safeguards for selected downstream products before the 2028 CBAM expansion. The idea is to identify key HS codes for EU-manufactured products with high steel content and establish a quota system similar to existing steel safeguards.

This approach reflects a growing concern that steel protection alone may not protect the steel value chain. If downstream manufacturers lose competitiveness, EU steel demand could weaken even if direct steel imports fall. The strategic issue is not only steel trade, but the survival of manufacturing demand inside Europe.

Steel Safeguards and Weak Orders Add Pressure to the Market

The new version of EU steel safeguard measures is still expected to take effect in July. However, market participants remain concerned about World Trade Organisation compliance, especially as the EU negotiates free-trade agreements that may include country-specific quotas.

Market sentiment is already weak. European service centres reported soft order intake in February, with some seeing volumes 10-20pc lower than a year earlier. This points to sluggish industrial activity and limited confidence across the steel distribution chain.

Import reliance may also decline this year. Some service centres expect imported material to fall to around 20pc of flat steel use, compared with as much as 40pc in previous years. That shift may support EU mills, but it also reflects a more controlled and uncertain market environment rather than a broad recovery in demand.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU’s steel challenge is no longer only about protecting mills from imported coil. The real risk is demand leakage, where downstream production moves outside Europe before CBAM fully covers finished steel-intensive goods.

Trade Measures to Dominate Steel Industry in 2025: Focus on Imports and Global Overcapacity

China Steel Factory

Trade protection measures have been the focal point of the global steel industry throughout 2024, with little indication of this trend slowing down in 2025. Steel producers, industry associations, and governments worldwide are increasingly advocating for stronger import barriers to safeguard domestic markets and improve the competitiveness of their industries. In particular, European steel mills have been at the forefront of this movement, calling for more robust action to combat what they view as unfair imports and growing overcapacity in the global market.

European Steel Industry Pushes for Stronger Import Protection

Eurofer, the industry association for European steel manufacturers, has been particularly vocal about the need for stronger trade defence instruments. The association has urged the European Union to implement short-term emergency measures, including import tariffication, to curb the influx of low-cost steel products. Eurofer's stance has been largely driven by the EU’s ambitious decarbonisation goals, with the bloc committing billions of euros in investment. Steel producers argue that the EU's current measures are insufficient, particularly in light of increasing steel imports from countries with lower production costs and fewer environmental regulations.

Significant progress has already been made, with Eurofer helping secure changes to the EU’s safeguard system for key products like hot-rolled coils (HRC) and wire rods. Additionally, the EU anti-dumping investigation targeting several HRC suppliers has gained traction, and further investigations are planned on downstream steel products. As European steel suppliers continue to collect evidence of unfair trade practices, more scrutiny is expected on countries like China, India, and Vietnam.

The Impact of Global Overcapacity and Chinese Steel Exports

The issue of global steel overcapacity has also been a major concern. The OECD has raised alarms about the growing steel production capacity, projecting a 158 million tonnes per year increase in global capacity between 2024 and 2026. This expansion, however, comes at a time when global steel demand remains uncertain. Despite this, steel exports from non-OECD countries have been recovering since 2023, particularly from China, whose steel exports surged by 22.6% from January to November 2024.

China has also been exporting record volumes of semi-finished steel, despite the country’s preference for exporting higher-value products. As China continues to ramp up exports, it has attracted the attention of both European and global policymakers, leading to new protectionist measures targeting Chinese steel. This includes potential investigations and pending duties on Chinese steel, which could affect up to 15 million tonnes per year of exports.

Countries like India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Malaysia are also seeing increases in steel exports, contributing to the global capacity glut. Turkey, a major market for Chinese steel, has already imposed duties on imports from China, India, Russia, and Japan in response to the increasing influx of steel from these regions. The EU is similarly considering the inclusion of Indonesia in its safeguard measures due to the country’s rising steel exports to Europe. From July to October 2024, Indonesia exported 494,650 tonnes of HRC to the EU, surpassing the previous half-year period, a trend that is expected to continue.

Investigations and Measures Targeting Global Steel Exporters

The growing export volumes from India and Vietnam, along with the rise in Indonesia’s exports to Europe, have prompted investigations into dumping practices in these countries. The EU has already initiated anti-dumping investigations on steel products from Egypt, Japan, India, and Vietnam, with the preliminary results of these investigations expected in March 2025. If these investigations lead to findings of unfair trade practices, retroactive duties could be applied, further tightening global trade conditions.

In response, producers are gearing up for a potential wave of new safeguard measures and anti-dumping duties. Countries that are impacted by these measures may look to retaliate, creating a complex global trade landscape for steel. As trade protectionism increases, the global steel market is expected to undergo significant shifts in the coming years.

EU Steel Industry Faces Key Policy Shifts: A Call for Concrete Measures

EU Steel

The mood among European policy makers regarding the steel industry has notably shifted, with increasing support for the sector’s future. According to Axel Eggert, director-general of Eurofer, the European steel industry association, policymakers are beginning to recognize the importance of addressing the growing challenges in global steel production. However, while this shift in mood is encouraging, Eggert emphasized that these positive words must be followed by tangible actions.

Rising Political Support for EU Steel Industry

Eggert pointed out that there is more political backing for the European steel sector, especially as lawmakers become increasingly aware of the massive overcapacity in global steel production, particularly CO2-intensive steel. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) predicts that global steel capacity will grow by 157 million tons over the next three years, which will likely negate the decarbonization efforts of the EU steel industry.

In response, the European Parliament has called for a European steel action plan, which has been embraced by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. However, Eggert stressed that while these statements are promising, they must be followed by concrete measures to ensure the long-term sustainability of the industry.

Green Steel and Public Procurement as Key Measures

One of the critical measures that Eggert advocates for is the implementation of public procurement for green steel. With the EU's ambitious decarbonization targets — a 55% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2050 — Eggert emphasized that EU governments should lead by example. This means prioritizing green steel in public sector construction, vehicles, and other products, which would support European producers committed to decarbonizing their operations.

Global Overcapacity and Trade Distortions Impacting EU Steel

The steel industry crisis is largely driven by global overcapacity and low demand in Europe, exacerbated by high energy costs. Compounding this issue is the low-priced steel being exported by countries like China, Japan, and India, which depresses global markets. China’s exports, in particular, have been an issue for EU steel producers, as the country benefits from state subsidies, leading to significant trade distortions.

Eggert discussed how the EU has implemented anti-dumping measures on stainless steel from Indonesia, but Indonesia has circumvented these by exporting processed steel to third-party countries like Taiwan, Vietnam, and Turkey, which then re-export the products back to the EU. This tactic, along with the support from Chinese investments in Indonesia’s steel industry, has made Indonesia’s steel sector one of the largest globally.

EU Trade-Defense Measures: Need for Improvement

Eurofer has called for enhanced EU trade-defense measures to tackle issues such as dumping and excessive capacity from third countries. Eggert emphasized the need for improved steel safeguards and more effective enforcement of existing trade defense instruments. Currently, anti-dumping duties on Chinese steel are too low, undermining the efficacy of EU trade policies.

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) Concerns

The EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) has been another point of contention. Third countries are already looking to export steel from their lowest CO2-emitting plants to avoid paying CBAM costs. Eggert advocated for including indirect CO2 emissions (Scope 2 emissions) in the CBAM, particularly for stainless steel, which is a major contributor to indirect emissions.

Scrap Export Concerns and India's Decarbonization Challenge

Finally, Eggert addressed concerns from India regarding the potential for a European export ban on scrap metal. While the EU does not currently have a scrap export ban, Eggert pointed out that India itself has export restrictions on scrap and needs to focus more on decarbonizing its domestic steel sector. He also warned that if India delays its decarbonization efforts until 2070, the EU will face a significant disadvantage in the global steel market.

CBAM to Add 15-25% Surcharge to EU Steel Import Costs Starting January 2026

EU Steel

The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will impose 15-25% surcharges on CBAM steel import costs when full implementation begins January 1, 2026, according to Euranimi analysis. The European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & Distributors warned that these additional costs will vary significantly depending on product type and country of origin. Steel importers face substantial cost increases as CBAM steel import costs rise through carbon pricing mechanisms designed to protect EU domestic steel producers from unfair competition.

CBAM Calculation Formula Creates Variable Cost Impact Across Origins

The CBAM surcharge calculation uses a specific formula measuring the difference between embedded emissions and 97.5% of EU benchmark standards multiplied by emissions trading system (ETS) pricing. This methodology ensures that steel imports face carbon costs comparable to EU domestic production under the emissions trading system. Meanwhile, Euranimi recommends that suppliers introduce separate CBAM surcharge lines in commercial offers, similar to existing alloy surcharge practices in steel trading.

Market participants anticipate significant import pattern changes as CBAM implementation approaches, with potential steel import surges in the fourth quarter of 2025. Importers may accelerate purchases before January 2026 to avoid initial CBAM steel import costs and associated compliance complexities. However, steel imports could decline sharply after January as buyers adjust to higher costs and new administrative requirements.

Implementation Timeline Creates Uncertainty for Steel Trade

Euranimi collaborates with the European Commission to develop "manageable" CBAM implementation procedures that minimize trade disruption while achieving environmental objectives. The association requests June publication of temporary benchmarks and default values for 2026 imports to provide market clarity. As a result, transitional benchmarks should be less strict initially while default values require reasonable levels to manage compliance costs.

Steel importers face significant uncertainty because verified emission data from non-EU suppliers won't be available until late 2026 at the earliest. Default values will play crucial roles in managing CBAM steel import costs during this transition period without verified supplier data. Therefore, appropriate default value settings prevent excessive financial exposure from unforeseen corrections and compliance adjustments.

The CBAM implementation represents a fundamental shift in global steel trade dynamics, creating competitive advantages for low-carbon steel producers while penalizing high-emission suppliers. European steel importers must adapt business models to incorporate carbon costs into pricing strategies and supplier selection processes. Consequently, CBAM steel import costs will reshape trade flows and encourage global steel industry decarbonization efforts through market mechanisms.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The 15-25% CBAM surcharge on steel imports marks a pivotal moment in global trade policy, potentially reshaping steel supply chains as importers seek lower-carbon suppliers to minimize carbon border costs. This mechanism could accelerate global steel industry decarbonization by creating economic incentives for cleaner production technologies, though it also risks disrupting established trade relationships and creating competitive disadvantages for developing country steel producers lacking access to clean technology.

China’s Predatory Steel Exports : A Threat to Latin America

The Latin American steel industry is grappling with a severe crisis precipitated by China’s predatory trade practices. The influx of cheap Chinese steel has flooded the market, imperiling local producers' livelihoods. Gabriela Fajardo Mejia, an expert in international relations at the University of Navarra, highlighted in her interview with Diálogo Américas that China’s steel overproduction endangers 1.4 million jobs across Latin America’s steel sector, compelling numerous companies to cease operations and lay off workers. Furthermore, Chinese steel production often bypasses established environmental and quality standards, with transparency regulations being routinely ignored.

Henry Ziemer, a researcher at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), pointed out that China's slowdown in real estate and construction has diminished domestic steel demand. Consequently, Chinese producers are compensating for reduced domestic sales through aggressive export strategies. With the U.S. market becoming increasingly inhospitable for Chinese steelmakers, they are now targeting Latin American countries, which present fewer trade barriers, to dispose of their surplus inventory.

The Chinese government's subsidies for steel production and exports during the pandemic exacerbated the issue, leading to a global proliferation of low-cost Chinese steel. In retaliation, Mexico, Chile, and Brazil have significantly raised tariffs on Chinese steel imports to safeguard their domestic industries, and other nations are expected to follow suit. Alejandro Wagner, the former Secretary-General of the Latin American Steel Association (Alacero), indicated in a BBC interview that the influx of inexpensive Chinese steel has caused significant damage to Latin American steel industries, forcing several major companies to halt their operations.

In March, Chilean steelmaker CAP suspended operations at its Huachipato plant due to the unsustainable business environment created by dumped Chinese steel. Operations resumed only after the Chilean government imposed substantial tariffs on Chinese steel. Similarly, Fabio Galan, president of Colombian steelmaker Acerías Pazdelrio, remarked on the devastating economic impact of cheap Chinese steel imports and called for fair competition.

Reports also suggest that Mexico’s iron ore mines, previously plundered by organized crime cartels, were pivotal in transporting stolen ore to China, highlighting the detrimental effects of China’s opaque and unfair trade practices.

Brazilian steel producer Gerdau temporarily laid off workers at its São José dos Campos plant in response to the unfair competition from Chinese steel. CEO Gustavo Werneck emphasized that this action was merely the initial step in tackling the surge of cheap Chinese steel imports.

Fajardo Mejia underscored the subsidies Chinese steel companies receive, enabling them to lower costs without adhering to quality and environmental standards. She also noted the considerable environmental impact, revealing that Chinese steel production emits 45% more CO2 per ton than Latin American production.

As a countermeasure, imposing tariffs on Chinese steel could escalate trade tensions between Latin American countries and China, with potential retaliatory actions from China, known for its coercive diplomacy. Historical instances, such as China’s bans on Argentine soybean products and Canadian canola seeds, exemplify possible consequences.

CSIS researcher Ziemer highlighted that China, the world’s largest steel producer, generates more steel than the combined output of the next nine largest producers, influencing international prices and destabilizing Latin American economies through dumping practices. He proposed that the current scenario offers an opportunity for the U.S. to collaborate with Latin American countries to counteract China’s unfair trade practices and safeguard domestic industries.

China steel industry stabilisation plan targets growth, discipline and greener output

China Steel

China’s new China steel industry stabilisation plan signals a renewed push to manage growth, capacity and pricing discipline. The government aims for around 4pc added value growth in 2025-26 while phasing out inefficient mills and banning new crude steel capacity. As a result, Beijing is trying to balance supply and demand through market-based elimination rather than another blunt production crackdown.

The China steel industry stabilisation plan prioritises competitive, higher-quality producers over weaker players. Authorities will curb “unfair competition” and “disorderly” low-price behaviour that has weighed on margins across the sector. Therefore, the plan supports consolidation around strong mills and seeks a more sustainable pricing environment for both long and flat steel products.

At the same time, the plan highlights technological upgrading, high-grade steel, and raw material security as core pillars. It calls for expanded investment to modernise production lines, accelerate low-carbon technologies and deepen the green energy transition. This innovation agenda links the China steel industry stabilisation plan directly to national strategies on industrial upgrading and decarbonisation.

Market reacts as China steel industry stabilisation plan lifts sentiment

Steel futures and spot prices reacted quickly to the announcement, even as underlying demand stayed soft. January rebar futures rose by 0.85pc to Yn3,185/t, and more than 10 mills lifted ex-works rebar offers by Yn30-50/t. However, physical trading volumes in rebar and flat products remained subdued despite the firmer sentiment.

Coking coal markets showed a more cautious response. January coking coal on the Dalian exchange closed just 0.12pc higher at Yn1,217.5/t. Many participants are still assessing how strictly the China steel industry stabilisation plan will be enforced and what it means for blast furnace operating rates. For now, sentiment in domestic coking coal remains stable rather than bullish.

Recent production data underline why Beijing is acting now. China’s crude steel output in August fell by 0.7pc year on year to 77.36mn t. January-August crude steel output dropped 2.8pc to 671.81mn t, reflecting weaker construction and real estate demand. In 2024, the top five producing provinces saw crude steel output fall 3.2pc to 522.73mn t, still accounting for 52pc of national output.

Supply-side reform echoes and the road ahead for China’s steel sector

President Xi Jinping has already signalled a political push against “disorderly low-price competition” and outdated capacity. Many market participants see the new plan as an echo of the 2015-17 supply-side reforms that aggressively cut overcapacity. However, most small, inefficient mills were already removed in that earlier cycle, leaving fewer obvious targets today.

Therefore, the next phase will likely focus on quality, emissions and efficiency rather than headline tonnage cuts. The China steel industry stabilisation plan emphasises precise capacity and output control instead of blanket production caps. That approach favours large, integrated groups with the capital to invest in green technologies, premium steel grades and digitalisation.

At the same time, Beijing wants to maintain enough capacity to support infrastructure, manufacturing and strategic industries. Balancing overcapacity risks with growth and employment remains a delicate task. How effectively the China steel industry stabilisation plan navigates this tension will shape global iron ore, coking coal and finished steel flows over the next two years.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China is shifting from a crude tonnage focus to a curated steel ecosystem built around fewer, stronger, greener champions. For global metals markets, that means more policy-driven volatility in the short term, but a likely structural tilt toward higher-value steel exports and more disciplined capacity at home. Suppliers of iron ore, coking coal and low-carbon steel technologies should all watch how fast policy turns into enforcement on the ground.

Jindal Stainless Specialty Steel Capacity Expansion Supports India’s Import Substitution Drive

Jindal Stainless

Jindal Stainless specialty steel capacity expansion marks another step in India’s push for higher-value industrial capacity. The company signed an MoU with the steel ministry under the production-linked incentive scheme. The move supports new capabilities in specialty steel, stainless steel, and forged products. As a result, Jindal Stainless specialty steel capacity expansion aligns closely with India’s import substitution strategy.

This matters because India still depends on imports for several critical steel grades. Those grades are essential for railways, defense, aerospace, and other strategic sectors. The new agreement aims to reduce that dependence and deepen local manufacturing strength. Therefore, Jindal Stainless specialty steel capacity expansion has significance beyond one company’s growth plan.

The broader policy backdrop is also strong. Under the scheme, 55 companies have signed 85 MoUs with planned investments of Rs118.87bn. These projects aim to add 8.7mn t of specialty steel capacity by fiscal 2030-31. Consequently, India specialty steel capacity expansion is becoming a national industrial priority.

India Specialty Steel Capacity Expansion Is Moving Up the Value Chain

India specialty steel capacity expansion is no longer only about tonnage growth. The current policy focus is shifting toward higher-value alloys and more advanced steel products. That is important because global competitiveness now depends on material quality as much as scale. As a result, the scheme is encouraging deeper technological capability.

Jindal Stainless fits that trend well. The company said it will augment current capacity and develop new capabilities in specialized alloys and forged products. That suggests a stronger move into more demanding industrial applications. Therefore, Jindal Stainless specialty steel capacity expansion supports a more advanced manufacturing profile.

This direction also improves long-term supply chain resilience. Domestic production of critical grades can reduce exposure to overseas supply disruptions and pricing pressure. Meanwhile, it can give Indian manufacturers more control over delivery and quality. That makes specialty steel import substitution more strategic than simple cost savings.

Specialty Steel Import Substitution Could Strengthen India’s Global Position

Specialty steel import substitution can also help India integrate more deeply into global manufacturing chains. The government expects the PLI scheme to support import replacement and stronger participation in international value chains. That combination matters for companies that want to move beyond domestic demand alone. Consequently, India strategic manufacturing is gaining both defensive and offensive value.

Jindal Stainless is already scaling capacity as part of its growth strategy. Management linked that expansion directly to rising demand from key national sectors. That suggests the company sees long-term structural demand, not only policy-driven opportunity. Therefore, Jindal Stainless specialty steel capacity expansion may prove commercially durable as well as politically aligned.

The larger message is clear. India wants to build more domestic strength in materials that support transport, defense, and advanced industry. The latest MoU shows that stainless and specialty steel producers will be central to that effort. As a result, India specialty steel capacity expansion is becoming one of the more important industrial themes in the country’s metals sector.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This agreement matters because it combines industrial policy with real capacity ambition. India is no longer focused only on producing more steel. It is focused on producing the right steel for strategic sectors. If execution stays on track, Jindal Stainless could strengthen its role in the next phase of India’s manufacturing upgrade.

Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion reshapes India’s steel landscape

Jindal Steel

India’s latest Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion signals a new phase in the country’s flat steel growth. The Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion lifts the site’s output and pushes India further into a high-capacity cycle. As a result, the Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion also raises questions about future domestic oversupply and export pressure.

Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion lifts output toward 12mn t/yr

Jindal Steel has commissioned a new 3mn t/yr basic oxygen furnace at its Angul plant in Odisha. The BOF takes the site’s steelmaking capacity from 6mn t/yr to 9mn t/yr, with a target of 12mn t/yr in the 2025-26 fiscal year. The Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion is anchored by a new 5mn t/yr blast furnace, started last week. Together, these assets support a broad product mix, including hot-rolled coil, galvanised steel, plate and rebar. This positions Angul as one of India’s key integrated hubs for flat and long products.

Indian steel capacity race intensifies across multiple producers

However, Jindal is not expanding alone, as rival Indian steelmakers also push new capacity. JSW Steel is enlarging its Vijayanagar facility in Karnataka, while Tata Steel brought a 5mn t/yr blast furnace online at Kalinganagar in 2024. These projects, combined with the Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion, are driving a rapid rise in India’s crude steel potential. Domestic demand remains strong in construction, infrastructure and manufacturing, yet capacity growth is outpacing exports. Therefore, market participants are increasingly focused on how new tonnes will be absorbed if external demand falters.

CBAM and weak exports raise risk of domestic stock build-up

Meanwhile, looming changes under the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism are already dampening Indian steel export flows. Buyers in Europe are reassessing supply chains and potential carbon cost pass-throughs, which could limit future Indian shipments. As exports dwindle, the Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion and parallel projects at JSW and Tata could contribute to inventory accumulation in the domestic market. A stock build-up would pressure prices and margins for Indian mills, especially in commoditised hot-rolled and rebar segments. As a result, strategic responses may include more value-added products, new export destinations and accelerated downstream integration.

The Metalnomist Commentary

India’s aggressive build-out, anchored by the Jindal Steel Angul capacity expansion, underlines its ambition to become a global steel powerhouse. Yet policy shifts such as CBAM mean that capacity alone is no longer enough; carbon cost, product mix and market access will decide who wins. For global buyers, India’s rising volumes may offer pricing opportunities, but also higher exposure to trade and climate-policy risk.

Thyssenkrupp Steel Restructuring Deepens as Losses Hit First-Quarter Results

Thyssenkrupp

Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring has moved into a more expensive and more decisive phase. The German steelmaker reported a €334mn net loss in the first quarter of its 2025-26 financial year. Most of that damage came from €401mn in restructuring expenses tied to Steel Europe. As a result, Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring is now shaping both earnings and the company’s future direction.

The latest loss matters because it reflects more than weak market conditions. Thyssenkrupp linked the restructuring costs to its collective agreement with IG Metall reached in December 2025. That agreement followed a period of lower prices and weaker shipments. Therefore, Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring is now moving from planning into full financial impact.

Steel Europe’s operating backdrop remains difficult. Sales in the division fell 10pc year on year to €1.96bn in the October-December quarter. Shipments also slipped 4pc to 1.73mn t. Consequently, weak pricing and soft demand in key end-use sectors are still weighing on Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe.

Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe Faces Weak Demand but Stable Operating Priorities

Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe continues to face pressure from sluggish European steel demand. The company said softer conditions in its main customer industries hurt both pricing and revenue. That remains a central challenge for the business. As a result, Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe is still operating in a market that offers little margin relief.

There were, however, a few areas of stability. Deliveries to automotive customers and steel service centres improved during the quarter. Hot-rolled coil deliveries also rose to 562,000t from both the previous quarter and the same period a year earlier. Therefore, not every volume indicator moved lower inside Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe.

Lower raw material costs and efficiency measures helped offset part of the damage. But they were not enough to reverse the broader earnings pressure. That means cost control is helping, yet not solving the core problem. Meanwhile, European steel demand remains too weak to deliver a meaningful recovery on its own.

Duisburg Direct Reduction Plant and Potential Sale Show Two Paths at Once

The company is now pursuing two major strategic paths at the same time. Thyssenkrupp confirmed confidential negotiations with India’s Jindal Steel International over a possible sale of Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe. Due diligence is already under way. As a result, Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring is no longer only about cost cutting. It is also about ownership change.

At the same time, the group is continuing construction of its Duisburg direct reduction plant. That project is moving ahead despite regulatory uncertainty. The decision suggests Thyssenkrupp still sees green steel investment as part of its long-term industrial future. Therefore, the Duisburg direct reduction plant remains strategically important even as asset sales are considered.

The company also reiterated plans to sell its stake in HKM to Salzgitter from 1 June 2026. It also reminded the market that blast furnace no 9 at Duisburg was shut permanently last October. These moves show a business actively reshaping its production base. Consequently, Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring is now affecting assets, ownership, and technology all at once.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Thyssenkrupp’s quarter shows how hard it is to restructure steel in Europe while demand stays soft and decarbonisation costs keep rising. The most important signal is not the quarterly loss alone. It is that Thyssenkrupp is now redesigning its steel business through labour agreements, asset sales, and lower-carbon investment at the same time.

Japan Increases EV Subsidies to Promote Green Steel Usage

Japan EV

New Incentives to Drive Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Steel

Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (Meti) has announced an increase in electric vehicle (EV) subsidies starting April 1st, aiming to promote the use of green steel. The new measure will provide up to ¥50,000 ($321) in additional financial support, expanding the subsidy to a total of ¥900,000 per EV, depending on the model and size, if it is manufactured with green steel. The initiative is part of Japan's broader green transformation policy to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Meti has secured a budget of ¥110 billion for the EV subsidy program. The main objective of this increase is not only to boost EV demand but also to support the domestic steel industry. Green steel, though more expensive to produce, has the same functionality as conventionally produced steel, which emits higher GHGs. Meti is addressing concerns among domestic steel producers, who fear the higher production costs of green steel may deter consumers.

Shifting Steel Production to Electric Arc Furnaces

Japan's steel industry is making efforts to reduce GHG emissions, especially through the transition to electric arc furnaces (EAFs). However, EAF plants require significant investment and face various technical challenges. Japan's largest basic oxygen furnace (BOF) producer, Nippon Steel, began commercial operations of an EAF in 2022, and JFE Steel plans to launch its own EAF by 2027. Additionally, Kobe Steel intends to replace one of its BOFs with an EAF facility by 2027.

Despite these advancements, the Japan Iron and Steel Federation (JISF) reported a 3.4% decline in EAF-produced crude steel in 2024, with EAF production accounting for 26.2% of the country’s total crude steel production.

Challenges in Boosting Green Steel Production and EV Sales

Although Meti's measures aim to increase green steel production, there are doubts about their effectiveness, given the sluggish performance of the domestic EV market. Sales of domestic passenger EVs in Japan plummeted by 33% in 2024, largely due to reduced demand for local EV brands. EVs accounted for only 1.5% of total passenger vehicle sales in Japan, down by 0.7 percentage points from the previous year. This decline raises questions about whether the increased subsidies will be enough to stimulate demand for both green steel and EVs.

EUROFER Revises 2024 EU Steel Consumption Forecast Downwards

The European Steel Association (EUROFER) has revised its 2024 steel consumption forecast for the European Union, citing an array of economic challenges. These include the protracted period of elevated interest rates, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, resultant energy crises, inflation, labor shortages, and supply chain disruptions in the Red Sea region due to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

In its recent "2024-2025 Economic and Steel Market Outlook" report, EUROFER predicts a modest 1.4% year-over-year increase in nominal steel consumption within the EU, reaching 127 million tons in 2024. This is a notable downward adjustment from the previously anticipated 3.2% increase to 130 million tons.

The report also recalibrates the 2025 forecast, lowering the expected growth from 5.6% to 4.1%, thereby predicting a total consumption of 133 million tons, down from the prior forecast of 137 million tons.

The first quarter of 2024 witnessed a 3.1% decline in EU nominal steel consumption year-over-year, totaling 31.9 million tons. This early-year contraction is expected to dampen the forecasted recovery for the remainder of the year. Significant uncertainties persist in steel consumption due to supply chain disruptions linked to the ongoing geopolitical conflicts, unprecedented surges in energy prices, and escalating production costs. Despite a gradual anticipated improvement towards the year's end, actual steel consumption is projected to remain below pre-pandemic levels.

EUROFER has also adjusted growth projections for steel demand industries downward. The Steel Weighted Industrial Production (SWIP) index fell by 1.9% in the first quarter of 2024, a stark contrast to the previous quarter's 0.5% rise. The decline in production across the EU’s steel-using sectors is attributed to the sustained impact of the Russia-Ukraine war, pervasive manufacturing weaknesses, global geopolitical tensions, and the long-term repercussions of the energy crisis.

The SWIP index decline highlights a persistent downturn in the construction, machinery, appliance, and metal product sectors, partially mitigated by continued growth in the automotive sector. The construction sector, which constitutes 35% of EU steel consumption, has been in recession since the third quarter of 2022, declining for seven consecutive quarters (-2.3%) through the first quarter of this year. High interest rates, labor shortages, and escalating material prices are expected to perpetuate the construction sector's downturn throughout the year.

The report states, "The positive trend in steel demand industries, which commenced post-pandemic, began to decelerate from the second half of 2022 due to rising energy costs and labor shortages following the Russia-Ukraine conflict, continuing through the fourth quarter of last year. This year’s deteriorating economic and industrial outlook for the EU is driven by high inflation and resultant interest rate hikes by the European Central Bank (ECB), with particularly adverse effects from the prolonged construction sector recession, ongoing geopolitical tensions, and worsening manufacturing conditions due to high interest rates."

The report continues, "Amid persistent adverse factors, the growth rate for steel demand industries is expected to decline to -1.6% in 2024, down from the previous forecast of -1%, with a rebound to 2.3% anticipated in 2025."

Notwithstanding the lowered forecasts for steel consumption and demand industries, import volumes have risen. According to the report, EU steel imports, including semi-finished products, increased by 12% year-over-year in the first quarter, mirroring the previous quarter's 11.3% rise.

Axel Eggert, EUROFER's Secretary General, emphasized, "While the EU's steel demand industries face a protracted downturn due to various adverse factors, import market share has risen significantly. This jeopardizes both European steel production and the associated clean technology value chains, necessitating urgent action at the EU level. The European Commission must swiftly conclude a European Clean Industry Agreement focused on the steel sector."

EPCG divests Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake as Jindal bid reshapes future

Thyssenkrupp

Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake negotiations have shifted sharply as EPCG exits and Jindal emerges as the preferred partner. The Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake will now likely anchor a new strategic direction focused on low-emission steel. As a result, the evolving ownership of the Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake will influence Europe’s decarbonisation trajectory and regional steel competition.

EPCG steps aside to clear path for Jindal Steel

EPCG agreed to divest its 20pc holding in Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe and withdraw from all joint-venture talks. The investment firm will return its Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake and receive full reimbursement of the purchase price. This move reflects Thyssenkrupp’s decision to concentrate negotiations on a single strategic bidder.

Previously, EPCG had planned to lift its stake from 20pc to 50pc and form a 50:50 joint venture. However, the situation changed once Indian producer Jindal Steel submitted an indicative bid for the business. Therefore, Thyssenkrupp is now prioritising a potential deal that couples ownership change with major green-steel investment.

Jindal promises decarbonised steel platform in Europe

Jindal Steel’s bid includes a commitment to complete the DRI project in Duisburg and add new EAF capacity. The group has signalled a financial commitment of more than €2bn to build this low-emission production base. Although the offer remains non-binding, Jindal says it aims to transform the company into Europe’s largest integrated low-emission steelmaker.

This pathway would align Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe with EU decarbonisation policy and future carbon cost pressures. At the same time, Thyssenkrupp is also exploring the sale of its 50pc stake in HKM, further reshaping its steel portfolio. Together, these moves point to a deep restructuring of German steel assets and ownership.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This pivot from EPCG to Jindal underlines how strategic buyers now link ownership with decarbonisation capital. For European steel, the key question is whether promised DRI and EAF investments materialise fast enough to preserve competitiveness. If executed, Jindal’s plan could turn Thyssenkrupp into a flagship low-emission hub, but integration and policy risks remain significant.

Steel replaces aluminum in autos as Cleveland-Cliffs courts OEMs

Cleveland-Cliffs

Steel replaces aluminum in autos as Cleveland-Cliffs seizes a rare opening in the US market. The steelmaker has completed a trial that used an automaker’s aluminum stamping equipment to press exposed steel body parts, without any tooling change. As a result, Cleveland-Cliffs now supplies routine production to that OEM and is fielding fresh inquiries from other automakers.

Steel replaces aluminum in autos after Novelis Oswego fire

The Novelis Oswego hot-mill fire created the moment in which steel replaces aluminum in autos more visibly. The blaze disrupted US automotive-body sheet supply, particularly for Ford and other large OEMs that rely on Novelis’ aluminum sheet. Cleveland-Cliffs moved quickly to demonstrate that corrosion-resistant steel stampings can run on existing aluminum presses with “no defects”, avoiding the high cost and delay of retooling.

However, a full structural swing back to steel still faces weight and fuel-efficiency headwinds. Automakers shifted to aluminum a decade ago to meet tightening emissions and mileage rules. Any broad move where steel replaces aluminum in autos will depend on advanced high-strength steel grades matching lightweighting targets, not just short-term supply disruptions.

What the steel pivot means for metals supply chains

The trial underscores how supply shocks can reopen material choices across automotive platforms. If more OEMs validate exposed steel on aluminum stamping lines, some incremental body-in-white demand could migrate from aluminum sheet back to coated automotive steel. That would tighten US flat-rolled steel balances while easing some pressure on aluminum body sheet during Novelis’ recovery.

Yet the aluminum industry is already mobilising its response. Novelis plans to restart its Oswego hot-rolling mill in December, far earlier than initial expectations. Other aluminum rollers are also qualifying alternative lines and products to backfill lost automotive-body sheet volumes. In that environment, Cleveland-Cliffs’ initiative is less a permanent displacement and more a strategic wedge into future platform decisions.

Focus keyphrases: steel replaces aluminum in autos, automotive-body sheet, Cleveland-Cliffs steel, Novelis Oswego fire

The Metalnomist Commentary

This episode shows how operational disruptions can quickly spill into long-term material strategy debates. Steelmakers that can prove drop-in compatibility on existing aluminum tooling gain leverage in negotiations over future model cycles. For metals suppliers on both sides, the real contest will be decided not by one fire, but by who can best align cost, weight and security of supply over the next decade.

Outokumpu Pushes for Tighter EU Steel Safeguards

Outokumpu

Outokumpu is putting EU steel safeguards at the centre of Europe’s industrial and climate debate. The Finnish stainless producer argues that current EU steel safeguards are too weak in the face of Asian overcapacity, diverted imports and sluggish European demand. As a result, Outokumpu says stronger EU steel safeguards are now essential to protect strategic supply chains and the business case for green steel investment.

Outokumpu links safeguards to decarbonisation and strategic autonomy

Outokumpu warns that Europe faces a surge of low-priced Asian stainless imports just as demand remains weak. The company argues that US tariffs of 50pc on steel are pushing excess volumes away from the US and into the EU market. Therefore, it believes new EU steel safeguards must prevent Europe from becoming a dumping ground for surplus Asian stainless steel. The company frames stronger safeguards as vital for mobility, infrastructure, defence and clean-tech value chains.

Outokumpu also connects trade defence directly to climate policy and low-carbon steel investment. It highlights its own stainless footprint of 1.6kg CO₂e/kg, versus a global average near 7kg CO₂e/kg. That advantage relies on high scrap usage and low-carbon power, which also increase production costs. Without tougher EU steel safeguards, Outokumpu argues, higher-emission Asian material will undercut European producers and undermine decarbonisation.

A blueprint for stricter quotas and carbon-aware trade rules

Outokumpu has tabled a detailed proposal for the next safeguard regime after 2026. It wants global tariff-rate quotas with strict per-country limits based on low-demand years such as 2012-13. Under its plan, imports above quota would face a 50pc tariff, with origin defined by melt-and-pour to block circumvention. It also opposes any quota carry-over, which can create import surges at quarter-end and destabilise prices.

The company calls for regular reviews of quota levels and tariffs, plus an emergency mechanism for sudden demand shocks. That mechanism would allow the EU to react if steel demand rebounds or if geopolitical events reshape trade flows. Outokumpu says the goal is to restore sustainable capacity utilisation and profitability for European mills. It stresses that, if Asian production displaces European output, Europe’s carbon footprint will rise and valuable stainless scrap will remain under-used.

Outokumpu further warns of growing strategic dependence on Indonesia and China if Brussels fails to act. In its view, weaker safeguards risk eroding European melting capacity and hollowing out the region’s stainless value chain. That would leave downstream manufacturers more exposed to external shocks and politically driven export restrictions. Stronger EU steel safeguards, the company argues, are therefore not only about prices, but also about security of supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Outokumpu’s intervention shows how trade defence, scrap utilisation and decarbonisation are now tightly interconnected in stainless steel. Brussels will need to balance open markets with credible protection for low-carbon producers if it wants green steel investment to continue. How the next safeguard package is designed will shape Europe’s stainless landscape – and its climate credentials – for the next decade.

EU Steel Import Proposal Freezes Trade and Deepens Market Divide

EU steel

The EU steel import proposal has pushed the European steel market into a new standstill as stakeholders reassess risk and supply. Producers see the EU steel import proposal as a long-awaited shield against global overcapacity and unfairly priced imports. However, buyers and downstream manufacturers warn that the same EU steel import proposal could choke critical inflows, push prices higher and erode competitiveness just as demand remains fragile.

Buyers fear a ‘steel clamp’ on downstream manufacturing

Assofermet describes the new regime as a “steel clamp” on distributors and processors that depend on non-EU material to fill gaps. It argues that the 50pc out-of-quota duty and deep quota cuts could effectively shut many import routes and destabilise supply. As a result, downstream steel users face higher costs, thinner margins and greater difficulty competing in global export markets. European automakers share similar concerns. Acea notes that even though 90pc of their steel is sourced domestically, the remaining imported grades are essential for safety-critical and advanced components. However, the group warns that sharply lower quotas and a 50pc duty will remove an important pressure valve for a market already stretched by energy costs and decarbonisation demands. Acea also criticises the melt-and-pour origin rule, arguing that it will add heavy administrative load to complex automotive supply chains without clear proportional benefits.

Producers back tighter controls to restore utilisation and independence

In contrast, Eurofer hails the proposal as a “major leap forward” in defending EU steel from low-priced, high-volume imports. The association points to quota breaches “by triple digits in just two days” under current rules as proof that existing safeguards are too loose. Therefore, Eurofer sees the new tariff-rate quota structure as a way to maintain fair import access while preventing destabilising surges. The ultimate objective is to lift plant utilisation from unsustainable levels around 65pc back towards 80-85pc, which is vital for viability and decarbonisation investment. Eurofer also backs the melt-and-pour clause to improve traceability and deter circumvention via third countries, and wants future coverage extended to steel derivatives. Meanwhile, day-to-day trading has slowed sharply as mills, traders and buyers wait for clarity on timelines and country allocations. Import activity is likely to remain subdued until the proposal passes the EU’s legislative process and implementation details become clearer, leaving the market in limbo.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU steel import proposal underscores a widening policy divide between protecting primary production and safeguarding downstream competitiveness. If design and implementation lean too far toward insulation, the risk is a tighter, more expensive steel market that accelerates deindustrialisation rather than preventing it. The eventual outcome will hinge on how Brussels balances utilisation targets with the real needs of processors, automakers and exporters across the EU value chain.

EU Launches Review of Steel Import Safeguard Tariffs: Changes Expected from April 2025

The European Commission(EC)

The European Commission(EC) has officially launched a review of its steel import safeguard tariff-rate quotas, with proposed changes to take effect from 1 April 2025. This review, which follows a request by 13 EU member states on 29 November 2024, aims to address the evolving dynamics of steel imports into the EU. The focus will be on adjusting quotas, particularly in light of a contraction in EU demand and a rise in Chinese steel exports, which have led to shifts in trade flows.

Key Changes Under Review for Steel Safeguard Tariffs

The EC's review will examine several key aspects of the current steel import safeguard measures. Among the possible changes is the introduction of a new quota volume. EU steel producers have expressed concerns that current duty-free quota volumes no longer align with the demand in the EU, with some regions experiencing gaps due to shrinking consumption. Additionally, an increase in Chinese steel exports has led to an influx of steel from other countries into the EU market, further complicating the allocation of quotas.

The EC will reassess how these quotas are managed and allocated. Producers and users have been invited to provide feedback via a questionnaire, which must be submitted by 10 January 2025. Some of the other factors under evaluation include the exclusion of certain developing countries from the safeguard measures based on their 2024 imports, as well as potential updates to the level of liberalization within the quotas.

The steel safeguard measures, which were first introduced provisionally in 2018, became definitive in 2019. Initially set for a three-year period, they were extended for another year until June 2024 and then further extended until June 2026. Recent updates to these measures have had a noticeable impact on trade, particularly with the cap on hot-rolled coils (HRC) and wire rod quotas from ‘other countries’ being limited to 15% per origin. This has resulted in a significant reduction in import opportunities, especially for smaller markets.

The Impact of the Quota Review on Steel Imports

The current steel import safeguard measures have significantly impacted trade flows within the EU. In previous years, quotas would exhaust quickly after being reset each quarter, but the 15% cap on 'other countries' volumes has left a larger portion of the quotas underused. While there were expectations that some countries, like South Korea, could increase exports to the EU in April 2025 when residual quota volumes become available, the upcoming review could alter this outlook.

With EU imports largely unaffected by these changes so far due to a rush to buy final volumes before the duties apply, the redistribution of quotas will be a key focus of the review. The EC aims to ensure that the safeguard measures strike a balance between protecting EU producers and allowing for sufficient import access to meet demand. These changes, when finalized, could have significant implications for steel producers and importers alike, influencing trade relationships and steel prices in the EU market.

China’s Steel Market Faces Persistent Challenges Despite Stimulus Measures

China’s Steel

Chinese steel prices experienced a modest rebound from multi-year lows in late September, spurred by a series of government stimulus policies. However, the steel market's long-term outlook remains uncertain due to sluggish domestic demand, weakening real estate investments, and global trade barriers.

Steel Prices Rebound, but Demand Stays Weak

Steel prices in China bottomed out in late September, with the People’s Bank of China reducing the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) by 0.5% and lowering mortgage rates. Despite these measures, real estate investments for January-September declined by 10.1% year-on-year, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). The area of new construction projects dropped by 22.2% over the same period, underscoring a lack of recovery in demand.

Domestic steel demand remains heavily tied to new construction and infrastructure projects. However, China’s shift in focus toward existing housing rather than new builds has limited the effectiveness of stimulus policies.

Steel Production Increases Amidst Price Rebound

Chinese steel mills responded to the price recovery by ramping up production. Profits rebounded from losses of Yn150-200 per ton in early September to Yn200-250 per ton by early October. Weekly rebar output reached 2.4 million tons in mid-October, the highest since late June. Blast furnace and electric arc furnace operation rates also hit two-month highs during this period.

Despite increased production, market participants anticipate a dip in construction steel demand from mid-November as northern cities enter the winter heating season.

Steel Exports: A Mixed Bag

Chinese steel exports surged by 21.2% year-on-year in January-September, totaling 80.71 million tons. However, this growth is under threat from rising anti-dumping measures in countries such as Turkey, India, Vietnam, and South Korea. With major overseas markets slowing operations during the Christmas season, export bookings are expected to taper off in December.

Stimulus Measures: Limited Impact on Real Estate

China’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) has announced significant fiscal measures, including a Yn1 trillion issuance of ultra-long special treasury bonds and an increased financial expenditure of Yn180 billion for 2024. Additionally, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MHURD) plans to rebuild 1 million apartments in shanty towns and dilapidated areas. However, these measures are relatively mild compared to the peak of 6 million units rebuilt annually from 2016 to 2018.

To further stimulate the housing market, most cities, except Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, have lifted purchase restrictions. Despite these efforts, the market remains constrained by long-term structural issues.

Market Outlook: Cautious Optimism

Shanghai hot-rolled coil (HRC) prices declined by Yn230 per ton (6.3%) from 7 October to Yn3,420 per ton as of yesterday. Market analysts suggest that while steel prices may not return to their September lows, downward pressure is likely in November and December.

As China continues to navigate economic headwinds, the steel sector’s recovery appears contingent on significant new investments and sustained domestic demand growth. The global context of anti-dumping measures and trade barriers adds another layer of complexity, potentially capping export growth prospects in the near term.

Eurofer Downgrades 2024 Steel Consumption Forecast Amid Geopolitical Tensions and Market Challenges

Eurofer

The European steel industry faces ongoing turbulence as Eurofer, the European Steel Association, has downgraded its 2024 steel consumption forecast. Instead of the previously expected 1.4% recovery, Eurofer now predicts a 1.8% contraction in apparent steel consumption for the year. This revision follows a combination of escalating geopolitical tensions, rising energy costs, and the continuation of a downtrend observed in recent quarters.

Revised Forecasts and Industry Outlook

Eurofer has also adjusted its forecast for the output of steel-using sectors, now anticipating a decline of 2.7%, down from the previously expected 1.6%. Despite these declines, the forecast for 2024 is less severe compared to last year, when apparent steel consumption fell by 6%. Looking ahead to 2025, Eurofer projects a 3.8% recovery in apparent consumption and a 1.6% increase in output from steel-using sectors. However, this expected rebound comes after consecutive annual declines, indicating that it reflects more of a recovery from a period of stagnation rather than a genuine improvement in demand.

Sector-Specific Challenges

Several key sectors that typically drive steel demand in Europe are facing significant headwinds. The automotive industry, a major consumer of flat steel, is grappling with the aggressive pricing strategies of Chinese automakers, particularly in the electric vehicle (EV) sector. This competitive pressure has led Volkswagen, one of Europe’s largest car manufacturers, to announce the closure of at least three plants and lay off thousands of employees in Germany.

The challenges are not limited to the automotive sector. In the construction industry, a lack of investment, high production costs, and financing constraints are negatively impacting steel demand. Similarly, the white goods sector is also struggling with high production costs, which are expected to worsen once the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) comes into effect in 2026. While the CBAM will not fully cover downstream industries like white goods at first, its eventual extension is expected to raise steel prices within the EU, potentially affecting European white goods' competitiveness, particularly against imports from China.

Looking Ahead: Steel Consumption in 2025

Despite the setbacks in 2024, Eurofer remains cautiously optimistic about 2025, projecting a modest recovery. However, the road to recovery is complicated by external pressures, including geopolitical tensions and global market shifts. The full impact of the CBAM, combined with ongoing challenges in key industries like automotive and construction, will likely continue to shape the steel market in Europe over the coming years.

China's HBIS Lowers August Manganese Alloy Tender Prices Amid Weaker Steel Demand

Chinese state-owned steel giant Hebei Iron and Steel (HBIS) has reduced its manganese alloy tender prices for August, reflecting a softening steel market and ample supply of the alloy. This price adjustment comes as the steel industry faces ongoing challenges, including reduced demand and a slowdown in construction projects.

For August deliveries, HBIS cut the tender price for 5,800 metric tons of high-carbon ferro-manganese (65% grade) to 5,800 yuan per ton ($813 per ton), a decrease of 800 yuan per ton from July. Additionally, the company launched a second round of provisional tender prices for silico-manganese (65/17 grade alloy) at 6,150 yuan per ton, slightly up by 50 yuan from the first provisional price but still down by 1,500 yuan from July.

The decision to lower prices was influenced by the abundance of spot supplies in the manganese alloy market, attributed to higher operating rates at alloy plants and diminished steel demand. Despite this, some alloy producers have maintained their prices due to rising ore feedstock costs, which have squeezed their profit margins. Many smelters reported that their production costs exceeded 6,300 yuan per ton, even after using lower-cost, non-mainstream ore feedstock imported from countries like Ghana, Myanmar, and Malaysia.

The reduction in tender prices also mirrors a broader trend in China's steel industry, where output has been cut in response to declining demand and financial losses. In July, China’s total steel output dropped by 8.7% year-on-year to 82.9 million tons, according to data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). The downturn in steel production is further exacerbated by weak demand in the construction sector, which has been sluggish due to a lack of new infrastructure projects and a struggling real estate market.

Investment in China's real estate sector, which accounts for roughly 40% of the country’s steel demand, fell by 10% year-on-year from January to July, according to NBS data. This downturn is reflected in the steel purchasing managers' index (PMI), which dropped by 5.3 points from June to 42.5 in July, marking a one-year low and signaling weak activity in the steel industry.

Overall, China's crude steel output fell by 2% year-on-year to 613.7 million tons in the first seven months of the year. The top five steel-producing provinces—Hebei, Jiangsu, Shandong, Liaoning, and Shanxi—saw their combined output fall by 14% year-on-year in July, accounting for just over half of the nation's total production.

Global Steel Output Declines 4.7% in September

World Steel

Global crude steel output fell by 4.7% year-on-year in September, reaching 143.6 million tons (mn t), according to data from the World Steel Association (Worldsteel). The decline was largely driven by reduced production in China, which accounts for 62% of the world’s steel output.

China’s Steel Struggles

China’s steel production dropped 6% to 77mn t in September, primarily due to weak domestic demand and multi-year lows in steel prices at the beginning of the month. While government stimulus efforts helped improve prices and production later in the month, the sharp drop in the first week outweighed the recovery. Despite this, production in October is expected to rise as steel prices continue to recover.

India: Steady but Facing Oversupply

India, the second-largest steel producer, maintained steady output compared to the previous year, driven by robust domestic demand. The country contributed nearly 10% of global steel production in September. However, as Indian mills expand capacities, there is concern about potential oversupply, with domestic demand unlikely to absorb the increased output. The festive season may temporarily boost consumption in the coming months.

Japan and Iran See Significant Declines

• Japan: Steel output fell by 5.8%, marking the seventh consecutive monthly decline. This was attributed to contracting demand from the auto and construction sectors.
• Iran: The most significant drop globally occurred in Iran, where production plummeted by over 40%. Severe power shortages hindered operations throughout most of September, although production normalized in the final week.

Outlook for Global Steel

As China’s recovery and India’s growth remain pivotal to global steel dynamics, the market faces challenges from oversupply, fluctuating demand, and economic uncertainties. October’s performance will be closely watched as producers adapt to these evolving conditions.