Showing posts sorted by relevance for query green steel. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query green steel. Sort by date Show all posts

Japan Increases EV Subsidies to Promote Green Steel Usage

No comments
Japan EV

New Incentives to Drive Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Steel

Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (Meti) has announced an increase in electric vehicle (EV) subsidies starting April 1st, aiming to promote the use of green steel. The new measure will provide up to ¥50,000 ($321) in additional financial support, expanding the subsidy to a total of ¥900,000 per EV, depending on the model and size, if it is manufactured with green steel. The initiative is part of Japan's broader green transformation policy to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Meti has secured a budget of ¥110 billion for the EV subsidy program. The main objective of this increase is not only to boost EV demand but also to support the domestic steel industry. Green steel, though more expensive to produce, has the same functionality as conventionally produced steel, which emits higher GHGs. Meti is addressing concerns among domestic steel producers, who fear the higher production costs of green steel may deter consumers.

Shifting Steel Production to Electric Arc Furnaces

Japan's steel industry is making efforts to reduce GHG emissions, especially through the transition to electric arc furnaces (EAFs). However, EAF plants require significant investment and face various technical challenges. Japan's largest basic oxygen furnace (BOF) producer, Nippon Steel, began commercial operations of an EAF in 2022, and JFE Steel plans to launch its own EAF by 2027. Additionally, Kobe Steel intends to replace one of its BOFs with an EAF facility by 2027.

Despite these advancements, the Japan Iron and Steel Federation (JISF) reported a 3.4% decline in EAF-produced crude steel in 2024, with EAF production accounting for 26.2% of the country’s total crude steel production.

Challenges in Boosting Green Steel Production and EV Sales

Although Meti's measures aim to increase green steel production, there are doubts about their effectiveness, given the sluggish performance of the domestic EV market. Sales of domestic passenger EVs in Japan plummeted by 33% in 2024, largely due to reduced demand for local EV brands. EVs accounted for only 1.5% of total passenger vehicle sales in Japan, down by 0.7 percentage points from the previous year. This decline raises questions about whether the increased subsidies will be enough to stimulate demand for both green steel and EVs.

EU Steel Industry Faces Key Policy Shifts: A Call for Concrete Measures

No comments
EU Steel

The mood among European policy makers regarding the steel industry has notably shifted, with increasing support for the sector’s future. According to Axel Eggert, director-general of Eurofer, the European steel industry association, policymakers are beginning to recognize the importance of addressing the growing challenges in global steel production. However, while this shift in mood is encouraging, Eggert emphasized that these positive words must be followed by tangible actions.

Rising Political Support for EU Steel Industry

Eggert pointed out that there is more political backing for the European steel sector, especially as lawmakers become increasingly aware of the massive overcapacity in global steel production, particularly CO2-intensive steel. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) predicts that global steel capacity will grow by 157 million tons over the next three years, which will likely negate the decarbonization efforts of the EU steel industry.

In response, the European Parliament has called for a European steel action plan, which has been embraced by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. However, Eggert stressed that while these statements are promising, they must be followed by concrete measures to ensure the long-term sustainability of the industry.

Green Steel and Public Procurement as Key Measures

One of the critical measures that Eggert advocates for is the implementation of public procurement for green steel. With the EU's ambitious decarbonization targets — a 55% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2050 — Eggert emphasized that EU governments should lead by example. This means prioritizing green steel in public sector construction, vehicles, and other products, which would support European producers committed to decarbonizing their operations.

Global Overcapacity and Trade Distortions Impacting EU Steel

The steel industry crisis is largely driven by global overcapacity and low demand in Europe, exacerbated by high energy costs. Compounding this issue is the low-priced steel being exported by countries like China, Japan, and India, which depresses global markets. China’s exports, in particular, have been an issue for EU steel producers, as the country benefits from state subsidies, leading to significant trade distortions.

Eggert discussed how the EU has implemented anti-dumping measures on stainless steel from Indonesia, but Indonesia has circumvented these by exporting processed steel to third-party countries like Taiwan, Vietnam, and Turkey, which then re-export the products back to the EU. This tactic, along with the support from Chinese investments in Indonesia’s steel industry, has made Indonesia’s steel sector one of the largest globally.

EU Trade-Defense Measures: Need for Improvement

Eurofer has called for enhanced EU trade-defense measures to tackle issues such as dumping and excessive capacity from third countries. Eggert emphasized the need for improved steel safeguards and more effective enforcement of existing trade defense instruments. Currently, anti-dumping duties on Chinese steel are too low, undermining the efficacy of EU trade policies.

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) Concerns

The EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) has been another point of contention. Third countries are already looking to export steel from their lowest CO2-emitting plants to avoid paying CBAM costs. Eggert advocated for including indirect CO2 emissions (Scope 2 emissions) in the CBAM, particularly for stainless steel, which is a major contributor to indirect emissions.

Scrap Export Concerns and India's Decarbonization Challenge

Finally, Eggert addressed concerns from India regarding the potential for a European export ban on scrap metal. While the EU does not currently have a scrap export ban, Eggert pointed out that India itself has export restrictions on scrap and needs to focus more on decarbonizing its domestic steel sector. He also warned that if India delays its decarbonization efforts until 2070, the EU will face a significant disadvantage in the global steel market.

EU Green Procurement Rules Face Industry Criticism Over Weak Steel and Fertilizer Demand

No comments
EU Green Procurement Rules Face Industry Criticism Over Weak Steel and Fertilizer Demand
Hydrogen Europe

EU green procurement rules are drawing sharp criticism from Hydrogen Europe after leaked draft legislation reduced the proposed low-carbon steel requirement in public procurement to 25pc from an earlier 70pc. The industry group said the change weakens the demand signal needed to support green steel, hydrogen, and low-carbon industrial investment.

EU green procurement rules in the latest draft require steel used in buildings, infrastructure, and transport projects to include at least 25pc low-carbon steel by volume. Hydrogen Europe argues that this level is too low to create a bankable market for emerging producers such as Stegra, Hydnum Steel, Saarstahl, and Salzgitter.

The dispute highlights a central problem in Europe’s industrial transition. Producers are being asked to invest in low-carbon steel, hydrogen, and cleaner fertilizers, but public procurement rules may not create enough guaranteed demand to justify those investments.

Low-Carbon Steel Requirement Falls Short of Industry Expectations

The reduction from 70pc to 25pc changes the industrial meaning of the proposal. A higher procurement target would have created a stronger lead market for European green steel, giving producers clearer demand visibility and helping justify capital spending on hydrogen-based and low-emission production routes.

Hydrogen Europe said the current draft does little to improve competitiveness against Chinese steel and Russian fertilizer imports. This is important because European producers face higher energy costs, strict carbon rules, and heavy investment requirements, while import competition continues to pressure margins.

The Industrial Accelerator Act still recognizes energy-intensive sectors through greenhouse gas intensity classification systems. These include fertilizers, chemicals, rubber, paper, plastics, coke, refined petroleum products, cement, glass, steel, and aluminium. However, the draft does not set green public procurement requirements for most of these product groups.

Fertilizer Sector Waits for Stronger Demand Measures

The fertilizer sector appears to receive limited support in the current draft. Industry sources said the sector may need to wait for the Fertiliser Action Plan, expected in the second quarter, for more concrete demand-side measures.

Low-carbon fertilizers matter because they connect clean ammonia, hydrogen demand, agriculture, and food supply chains. However, procurement requirements are more politically complex because agriculture remains highly sensitive to cost increases and supply security concerns.

The final clean product procurement percentage will be negotiated over the next 12-18 months by the European parliament and EU member states. That process will determine whether EU green procurement rules become a serious industrial policy tool or remain a limited climate-labeling framework.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s problem is no longer only technology readiness; it is market creation. Without stronger demand rules for low-carbon steel, hydrogen, and fertilizers, the EU risks asking companies to invest in clean capacity without giving them a reliable customer base.

Outokumpu Pushes for Tighter EU Steel Safeguards

No comments
Outokumpu Pushes for Tighter EU Steel Safeguards
Outokumpu

Outokumpu is putting EU steel safeguards at the centre of Europe’s industrial and climate debate. The Finnish stainless producer argues that current EU steel safeguards are too weak in the face of Asian overcapacity, diverted imports and sluggish European demand. As a result, Outokumpu says stronger EU steel safeguards are now essential to protect strategic supply chains and the business case for green steel investment.

Outokumpu links safeguards to decarbonisation and strategic autonomy

Outokumpu warns that Europe faces a surge of low-priced Asian stainless imports just as demand remains weak. The company argues that US tariffs of 50pc on steel are pushing excess volumes away from the US and into the EU market. Therefore, it believes new EU steel safeguards must prevent Europe from becoming a dumping ground for surplus Asian stainless steel. The company frames stronger safeguards as vital for mobility, infrastructure, defence and clean-tech value chains.

Outokumpu also connects trade defence directly to climate policy and low-carbon steel investment. It highlights its own stainless footprint of 1.6kg CO₂e/kg, versus a global average near 7kg CO₂e/kg. That advantage relies on high scrap usage and low-carbon power, which also increase production costs. Without tougher EU steel safeguards, Outokumpu argues, higher-emission Asian material will undercut European producers and undermine decarbonisation.

A blueprint for stricter quotas and carbon-aware trade rules

Outokumpu has tabled a detailed proposal for the next safeguard regime after 2026. It wants global tariff-rate quotas with strict per-country limits based on low-demand years such as 2012-13. Under its plan, imports above quota would face a 50pc tariff, with origin defined by melt-and-pour to block circumvention. It also opposes any quota carry-over, which can create import surges at quarter-end and destabilise prices.

The company calls for regular reviews of quota levels and tariffs, plus an emergency mechanism for sudden demand shocks. That mechanism would allow the EU to react if steel demand rebounds or if geopolitical events reshape trade flows. Outokumpu says the goal is to restore sustainable capacity utilisation and profitability for European mills. It stresses that, if Asian production displaces European output, Europe’s carbon footprint will rise and valuable stainless scrap will remain under-used.

Outokumpu further warns of growing strategic dependence on Indonesia and China if Brussels fails to act. In its view, weaker safeguards risk eroding European melting capacity and hollowing out the region’s stainless value chain. That would leave downstream manufacturers more exposed to external shocks and politically driven export restrictions. Stronger EU steel safeguards, the company argues, are therefore not only about prices, but also about security of supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Outokumpu’s intervention shows how trade defence, scrap utilisation and decarbonisation are now tightly interconnected in stainless steel. Brussels will need to balance open markets with credible protection for low-carbon producers if it wants green steel investment to continue. How the next safeguard package is designed will shape Europe’s stainless landscape – and its climate credentials – for the next decade.

EU Approves Funding for Sweden's H2 Green Steel

No comments

The European Commission has approved funding for H2 Green Steel to build a large-scale green steel plant in Boden, Sweden.

This project includes the construction of a 690 MW hydrogen electrolyzer, one of the largest in the world, a direct reduced iron (DRI) plant using hydrogen fuel, two electric arc furnaces, and cold rolling and finishing facilities.

The European Commission's review aimed to determine if the subsidy complies with state aid regulations, concluding that Sweden's €265 million subsidy is necessary and appropriate to promote green steel production, with positive effects outweighing potential distortions to EU competition and trade.

H2 Green Steel aims to build Europe’s first large-scale steel plant that exclusively uses hydrogen derived from renewable energy sources.

Thyssenkrupp Steel Restructuring Deepens as Losses Hit First-Quarter Results

No comments
Thyssenkrupp Steel Restructuring Deepens as Losses Hit First-Quarter Results
Thyssenkrupp

Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring has moved into a more expensive and more decisive phase. The German steelmaker reported a €334mn net loss in the first quarter of its 2025-26 financial year. Most of that damage came from €401mn in restructuring expenses tied to Steel Europe. As a result, Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring is now shaping both earnings and the company’s future direction.

The latest loss matters because it reflects more than weak market conditions. Thyssenkrupp linked the restructuring costs to its collective agreement with IG Metall reached in December 2025. That agreement followed a period of lower prices and weaker shipments. Therefore, Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring is now moving from planning into full financial impact.

Steel Europe’s operating backdrop remains difficult. Sales in the division fell 10pc year on year to €1.96bn in the October-December quarter. Shipments also slipped 4pc to 1.73mn t. Consequently, weak pricing and soft demand in key end-use sectors are still weighing on Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe.

Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe Faces Weak Demand but Stable Operating Priorities

Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe continues to face pressure from sluggish European steel demand. The company said softer conditions in its main customer industries hurt both pricing and revenue. That remains a central challenge for the business. As a result, Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe is still operating in a market that offers little margin relief.

There were, however, a few areas of stability. Deliveries to automotive customers and steel service centres improved during the quarter. Hot-rolled coil deliveries also rose to 562,000t from both the previous quarter and the same period a year earlier. Therefore, not every volume indicator moved lower inside Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe.

Lower raw material costs and efficiency measures helped offset part of the damage. But they were not enough to reverse the broader earnings pressure. That means cost control is helping, yet not solving the core problem. Meanwhile, European steel demand remains too weak to deliver a meaningful recovery on its own.

Duisburg Direct Reduction Plant and Potential Sale Show Two Paths at Once

The company is now pursuing two major strategic paths at the same time. Thyssenkrupp confirmed confidential negotiations with India’s Jindal Steel International over a possible sale of Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe. Due diligence is already under way. As a result, Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring is no longer only about cost cutting. It is also about ownership change.

At the same time, the group is continuing construction of its Duisburg direct reduction plant. That project is moving ahead despite regulatory uncertainty. The decision suggests Thyssenkrupp still sees green steel investment as part of its long-term industrial future. Therefore, the Duisburg direct reduction plant remains strategically important even as asset sales are considered.

The company also reiterated plans to sell its stake in HKM to Salzgitter from 1 June 2026. It also reminded the market that blast furnace no 9 at Duisburg was shut permanently last October. These moves show a business actively reshaping its production base. Consequently, Thyssenkrupp steel restructuring is now affecting assets, ownership, and technology all at once.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Thyssenkrupp’s quarter shows how hard it is to restructure steel in Europe while demand stays soft and decarbonisation costs keep rising. The most important signal is not the quarterly loss alone. It is that Thyssenkrupp is now redesigning its steel business through labour agreements, asset sales, and lower-carbon investment at the same time.

Mercedes bets on green aluminium from Norway's Hydro for next-gen CLA

No comments
Mercedes bets on green aluminium from Norway's Hydro for next-gen CLA
Mercedes aluminium body

Mercedes is turning to green aluminium from Norway's Hydro to cut embedded emissions in its new CLA model. The green aluminium from Norway's Hydro is certified at just 3kg of CO₂ per kilogram of metal across mining, refining, smelting and casting. This compares with a global average of 16.7kg, giving Mercedes a meaningful reduction in material-related emissions. The alloy also contains 25pc post-consumer scrap, which further lowers its lifecycle footprint and supports circular-economy targets.

However, the company’s claim that CLA production is “net carbon-neutral” still depends on offsets. Mercedes powers the plant with 100pc renewable electricity, mainly externally sourced hydropower, which materially cuts scope 2 emissions. But scope 1 emissions from on-site processes and logistics, as well as upstream emissions from suppliers, remain. Therefore, the move to green aluminium from Norway's Hydro is a genuine step forward, even if the overall net-zero claim rests partly on controversial offset mechanisms that investors often scrutinise.

Green aluminium supports low-carbon steel and battery initiatives

The CLA’s use of green aluminium from Norway's Hydro forms part of a broader materials decarbonisation strategy. Mercedes says its latest battery cell design cuts emissions by about 30pc per cell through renewable energy in anode and cathode production. The company also relies on “net carbon-neutral” cell manufacturing at suppliers, since it does not produce cells in-house. As a result, the true impact depends on supplier practices and verification of their renewable power usage.

Meanwhile, Mercedes is layering in low-carbon steel to tackle emissions in chassis and body-in-white applications. The CLA incorporates steel from US producer Nucor’s Econiq-RE range, made using 100pc renewable energy. Mercedes also has a deal with Steel Dynamics for more than 50,000 t/yr of CO₂-reduced steel for its Tuscaloosa plant. Together with green aluminium from Norway's Hydro, these supply contracts show how OEMs are weaponising procurement to reduce embodied carbon ahead of incoming carbon border measures.

Demand for certified green aluminium rises faster than headline prices

Demand for certified low-carbon aluminium is rising as automakers prepare for tighter climate regulations and potential carbon border charges. Carmakers want to cut embedded emissions at the material level, especially for high-intensity metals such as aluminium and steel. This is likely to support growing premiums for Hydro’s Reduxa-style green aluminium grades and similar products from competitors. As a result, upstream smelters with renewable power and high scrap usage gain a strategic pricing advantage.

However, headline aluminium prices on global exchanges remain relatively stable despite bullish long-term forecasts. London Metal Exchange cash aluminium has traded in a narrow range over the past year, even as demand for differentiated “green” material accelerates. This suggests that the value is migrating into contract premiums and long-term offtake deals instead of the base price. Over time, producers unable to demonstrate low-carbon credentials may find themselves pushed into a discounted “grey” segment of the market.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Mercedes’ partnership around green aluminium from Norway's Hydro shows how decarbonisation is increasingly driven by procurement, not just tailpipe regulation. For metals producers, the message is clear: access to cheap renewable power and high-quality scrap streams will shape competitiveness more than pure tonnage growth. As carbon accounting tightens, the premium for verifiable low-carbon tonnes is likely to widen, rewarding early movers across the aluminium value chain.

China steel industry stabilisation plan targets growth, discipline and greener output

No comments
China steel industry stabilisation plan targets growth, discipline and greener output
China Steel

China’s new China steel industry stabilisation plan signals a renewed push to manage growth, capacity and pricing discipline. The government aims for around 4pc added value growth in 2025-26 while phasing out inefficient mills and banning new crude steel capacity. As a result, Beijing is trying to balance supply and demand through market-based elimination rather than another blunt production crackdown.

The China steel industry stabilisation plan prioritises competitive, higher-quality producers over weaker players. Authorities will curb “unfair competition” and “disorderly” low-price behaviour that has weighed on margins across the sector. Therefore, the plan supports consolidation around strong mills and seeks a more sustainable pricing environment for both long and flat steel products.

At the same time, the plan highlights technological upgrading, high-grade steel, and raw material security as core pillars. It calls for expanded investment to modernise production lines, accelerate low-carbon technologies and deepen the green energy transition. This innovation agenda links the China steel industry stabilisation plan directly to national strategies on industrial upgrading and decarbonisation.

Market reacts as China steel industry stabilisation plan lifts sentiment

Steel futures and spot prices reacted quickly to the announcement, even as underlying demand stayed soft. January rebar futures rose by 0.85pc to Yn3,185/t, and more than 10 mills lifted ex-works rebar offers by Yn30-50/t. However, physical trading volumes in rebar and flat products remained subdued despite the firmer sentiment.

Coking coal markets showed a more cautious response. January coking coal on the Dalian exchange closed just 0.12pc higher at Yn1,217.5/t. Many participants are still assessing how strictly the China steel industry stabilisation plan will be enforced and what it means for blast furnace operating rates. For now, sentiment in domestic coking coal remains stable rather than bullish.

Recent production data underline why Beijing is acting now. China’s crude steel output in August fell by 0.7pc year on year to 77.36mn t. January-August crude steel output dropped 2.8pc to 671.81mn t, reflecting weaker construction and real estate demand. In 2024, the top five producing provinces saw crude steel output fall 3.2pc to 522.73mn t, still accounting for 52pc of national output.

Supply-side reform echoes and the road ahead for China’s steel sector

President Xi Jinping has already signalled a political push against “disorderly low-price competition” and outdated capacity. Many market participants see the new plan as an echo of the 2015-17 supply-side reforms that aggressively cut overcapacity. However, most small, inefficient mills were already removed in that earlier cycle, leaving fewer obvious targets today.

Therefore, the next phase will likely focus on quality, emissions and efficiency rather than headline tonnage cuts. The China steel industry stabilisation plan emphasises precise capacity and output control instead of blanket production caps. That approach favours large, integrated groups with the capital to invest in green technologies, premium steel grades and digitalisation.

At the same time, Beijing wants to maintain enough capacity to support infrastructure, manufacturing and strategic industries. Balancing overcapacity risks with growth and employment remains a delicate task. How effectively the China steel industry stabilisation plan navigates this tension will shape global iron ore, coking coal and finished steel flows over the next two years.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China is shifting from a crude tonnage focus to a curated steel ecosystem built around fewer, stronger, greener champions. For global metals markets, that means more policy-driven volatility in the short term, but a likely structural tilt toward higher-value steel exports and more disciplined capacity at home. Suppliers of iron ore, coking coal and low-carbon steel technologies should all watch how fast policy turns into enforcement on the ground.

EPCG divests Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake as Jindal bid reshapes future

No comments
EPCG divests Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake as Jindal bid reshapes future
Thyssenkrupp

Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake negotiations have shifted sharply as EPCG exits and Jindal emerges as the preferred partner. The Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake will now likely anchor a new strategic direction focused on low-emission steel. As a result, the evolving ownership of the Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake will influence Europe’s decarbonisation trajectory and regional steel competition.

EPCG steps aside to clear path for Jindal Steel

EPCG agreed to divest its 20pc holding in Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe and withdraw from all joint-venture talks. The investment firm will return its Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe stake and receive full reimbursement of the purchase price. This move reflects Thyssenkrupp’s decision to concentrate negotiations on a single strategic bidder.

Previously, EPCG had planned to lift its stake from 20pc to 50pc and form a 50:50 joint venture. However, the situation changed once Indian producer Jindal Steel submitted an indicative bid for the business. Therefore, Thyssenkrupp is now prioritising a potential deal that couples ownership change with major green-steel investment.

Jindal promises decarbonised steel platform in Europe

Jindal Steel’s bid includes a commitment to complete the DRI project in Duisburg and add new EAF capacity. The group has signalled a financial commitment of more than €2bn to build this low-emission production base. Although the offer remains non-binding, Jindal says it aims to transform the company into Europe’s largest integrated low-emission steelmaker.

This pathway would align Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe with EU decarbonisation policy and future carbon cost pressures. At the same time, Thyssenkrupp is also exploring the sale of its 50pc stake in HKM, further reshaping its steel portfolio. Together, these moves point to a deep restructuring of German steel assets and ownership.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This pivot from EPCG to Jindal underlines how strategic buyers now link ownership with decarbonisation capital. For European steel, the key question is whether promised DRI and EAF investments materialise fast enough to preserve competitiveness. If executed, Jindal’s plan could turn Thyssenkrupp into a flagship low-emission hub, but integration and policy risks remain significant.

EU flat-rolled steel import quotas tighten under new safeguard regime

No comments
EU flat-rolled steel import quotas tighten under new safeguard regime
Flat-rolled

The EU flat-rolled steel import quotas are tightening sharply as Brussels moves from safeguards to a tougher quota–tariff regime. The new framework cuts flat-rolled quotas by 8.5mn t and caps hot-rolled coil imports at 5.2mn t. Any imports above quota will face a 50pc tariff, putting EU flat-rolled steel import quotas at the centre of trade and pricing strategy for mills and buyers.

New quota caps reshape EU flat-rolled trade flows

The EU flat-rolled steel import quotas now impose strict volume limits on key product groups. Hot-rolled coil quota falls by 3.6mn t versus 2024 import levels, compressing available third-country supply. Cold-rolled coil quota drops to 1.5mn t a year, while hot-dip galvanised is capped at 2.85mn t. As a result, quarterly quotas with no rollover will force importers to time cargoes far more precisely.

However, the system still applies a pro-rata approach at the start of each quota period. Once the EU flat-rolled steel import quotas are exhausted, the 50pc tariff will effectively price out most additional tonnes. All origins, including Ukraine, remain in scope, although the commission signalled it will consider Kyiv’s security situation when allocating volumes. The package also introduces a melt-and-pour information requirement, but without yet blocking Chinese-melted steel processed elsewhere.

Policy aims: higher utilisation, stronger EU pricing power

The EU flat-rolled steel import quotas aim to lift mill utilisation from about 67pc to 80pc. Eurofer quickly hailed the proposal as a long-awaited defence of the European steel sector. European producers hope tighter borders will support base prices and margins after years of pressure from low-cost Asian imports. Meanwhile, UK Steel urged London to seek preferential treatment and tighten its own safeguards to protect British mills.

Yet the new framework also raises concerns among downstream users such as re-rollers, processors and steel service centres. Quarterly caps without carry-over increase the risk of abrupt supply squeezes and bidding wars late in each period. Buyers will need to diversify sourcing, lock in earlier contracts and hedge more actively as EU flat-rolled steel import quotas bite. Market participants must also watch the regulatory process, since the proposal still needs EU parliament approval and could evolve before implementation.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The shift from classic safeguards to hard volume caps and 50pc tariffs marks a structural tightening of Europe’s import gate. For supply-chain planners, the key is to model quarterly quota exhaustion and stress-test exposure to high-tariff volumes, especially in HRC and galvanised. Over the medium term, the system could accelerate onshoring and green-steel investment, but at the cost of more volatile availability and pricing for downstream manufacturers.

Indonesia Carbon Market CBAM Strategy Targets Green Nickel and Stainless Steel Future

No comments
Indonesia Carbon Market CBAM Strategy Targets Green Nickel and Stainless Steel Future
Indonesia Carbon

Indonesia is accelerating its carbon market development in coordination with the European Union ahead of the 2026 CBAM rollout. The Indonesia carbon market CBAM strategy aims to help domestic producers avoid punitive tariffs by establishing a mandatory emissions trading system (ETS) and promoting decarbonization.

ETS and Green Industrial Strategy in Development

Indonesia’s Ministry of Industry is working with the European Commission to design a carbon market aligned with the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). According to Apit Pria Nugraha, Head of the Centre for Green Industry, the goal is to use carbon credits to offset CBAM tariffs for sectors like stainless steel. Although nickel is not directly included in the CBAM, it faces indirect exposure through downstream products.

Indonesia is upgrading furnaces, enhancing ESG standards, and preparing export-focused green incentives. These include preferential treatment for certified green products and financing tools to support innovation. Nugraha emphasized that companies meeting CBAM and ESG targets early will benefit from price premiums and stronger global partnerships.

Nickel Industry Prepares for ESG-Driven Market Shift

Indonesia’s nickel sector, vital to the EV battery supply chain, is adapting quickly to ESG scrutiny. Nickel Industries, a major producer, announced plans to reduce its carbon footprint by deploying solar power and heat recovery systems in high-pressure acid leaching operations. The company’s carbon intensity is projected at 6.97 tonnes of CO₂ per tonne of nickel, nearly half the industry average.

M. Muchtazar, Head of Sustainability at Nickel Industries, noted that ESG is now a top competitive factor. Compliance with EU carbon regulations is no longer optional as automakers demand cleaner supply chains for EV materials.

CBAM to Reshape Global Trade Dynamics

CBAM will act as a de facto import tariff on high-emission goods entering the EU. Simon Goess of Carboneer estimated that importers of 85,000 tonnes of pig iron, ferro-nickel, and crude steel could face up to €40 million in charges by 2034. As CBAM expands to include Class 1 nickel and indirect emissions, producers must lower carbon intensity to remain globally competitive.

Nugraha concluded that “green nickel” is more than a buzzword—it’s a strategic imperative for Indonesia’s industrial future.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Indonesia’s proactive stance on carbon pricing and ESG compliance signals a significant policy shift. By integrating CBAM-aligned mechanisms and promoting low-carbon nickel, Indonesia positions itself as a preferred supplier in the evolving global metals supply chain.

CBAM certificate exemption debate exposes EU steel and aluminium fault lines

No comments
CBAM certificate exemption debate exposes EU steel and aluminium fault lines
Assofermet

European metals companies are intensifying calls for a CBAM certificate exemption as the carbon border regime nears full implementation. The demand for a temporary CBAM certificate exemption reflects deep concern that missing benchmark values and default parameters could destabilise trade in steel and aluminium. Without clarity on CBAM certificate obligations, EU importers are being asked to place orders blind, with no way to predict final embedded carbon costs.

Importers warn of blind CBAM exposure and supply risk

Assofermet argues that a CBAM certificate exemption is needed for imports cleared from 1 January 2026 until several months after default values are published. The association stresses that the absence of final CBAM benchmarks forces buyers to commit to steel and aluminium imports today without knowing future certificate prices. As a result, many traders see the current framework as an unacceptable risk, especially for long-lead contracts and financially constrained small and mid-sized firms.

The proposed CBAM certificate exemption would cover a transition window of up to five months after the release of default values. During this period, importers would not need to surrender CBAM certificates, allowing them to honour existing supply contracts and avoid sudden cost shocks. However, policy uncertainty remains high, as Brussels continues to refine CBAM methodologies, rules for recognising third-country carbon prices, and the interaction with free ETS allocations. Meanwhile, downstream users fear that simultaneous measures, including “melted and poured” origin rules and potential extensions of steel and aluminium safeguards, could combine with CBAM to sharply reduce available import volumes.

Downstream steel users fear a pincer movement on competitiveness

Metals distributors and processors warn that CBAM certificate obligations, when combined with new safeguards, risk forming a regulatory pincer on the EU manufacturing base. Assofermet says the current steel and metals action plan prioritises primary producers while overlooking the needs of re-rollers, processors and trading firms that depend on diverse import flows. If imports drop too sharply, many downstream players could face supply gaps, higher input costs and further margin compression in an already weak economic environment.

A parallel warning comes from steel distributors who highlight a surge in imports of steel-intensive finished goods that fall outside current trade defence instruments and CBAM coverage. Products such as drive axles, electric motor components, fabricated assemblies and metal furniture embed significant steel content but enter the EU under less restrictive regimes. Industry groups argue this asymmetry accelerates deindustrialisation: raw and semi-finished steel face tight controls and rising costs, while finished imports gain a competitive edge. Many therefore call not only for targeted CBAM certificate exemption windows, but also for broader reform to extend CBAM and trade defence tools to steel-containing goods with high import growth and proven steel intensity.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The struggle over CBAM certificate exemption shows how climate policy can collide with industrial realities when timelines and technical details are misaligned. Unless benchmarks, default values and scope definitions are finalised quickly, the EU risks pushing critical downstream manufacturers into supply insecurity just as it needs them to invest in green technologies. A more calibrated rollout, including temporary exemptions and better coverage of steel-intensive finished goods, will be essential to protect both decarbonisation goals and Europe’s industrial backbone.

Projected Recovery in Japan's Crude Steel Output in FY 2025, IEEJ Reports

No comments
IEEJ

Japan is poised for a rebound in crude steel production in the fiscal year 2025, driven by an upturn in broader domestic industrial sectors such as automotive, electronics, and industrial machinery, as per the latest forecast from the Institution of Energy Economy Japan (IEEJ).

Growth in Domestic Industries Fuels Steel Production

According to the IEEJ's projections announced on December 24, Japan’s crude steel output is anticipated to increase by 4.1% year-on-year to 86.5 million tons in FY 2024-25. This marks the first annual growth in four years, signaling a significant recovery in the sector. The uptrend in domestic car production, expected to rise by 1.8% to 8.9 million units, is a key factor contributing to this resurgence. Furthermore, investments in digitalization and green technologies are expected to support sustained demand for steel throughout the forecast period.

Export Outlook and Challenges

The IEEJ also expects a modest increase in Japan's steel product exports by 1.2% year-on-year, following positive trends in the global manufacturing sectors. This comes after Japan exported approximately 32 million tons of steel products in the previous fiscal year, as reported by the Japan Iron and Steel Federation (JISF).

Despite this optimistic forecast, the steel industry has faced challenges such as rising material costs and labor shortages, which have impacted the construction sector and dampened steel demand. Additionally, operational disruptions at major automotive manufacturers like Toyota and Daihatsu, due to issues with safety test reporting, have further strained demand. These factors have contributed to a protracted period of decline in steel orders, particularly for automobile manufacturing, with a tenth consecutive month of year-on-year decline observed in October.

Metallised manganese pellets deal links GMnT and Scandinavian Steel

No comments
Metallised manganese pellets deal links GMnT and Scandinavian Steel
Manganese

Green Manganese Technologies signed a preliminary distribution deal with Scandinavian Steel for metallised manganese pellets. The agreement targets European steel buyers seeking stable inputs. Meanwhile, GMnT advances hydrometallurgical processing to make high-purity manganese from ores and industrial waste.

The companies plan a phased route to market. First, Scandinavian Steel will connect GMnT with European users for testing and qualification. As a result, buyers can validate metallised manganese pellets under real industrial conditions.

Once production scales, Scandinavian Steel will purchase up to 50,000 tonnes per year for exclusive European distribution. That volume could equal 5–6% of European Union manganese-based ferroalloy import demand. Therefore, the metallised manganese pellets plan signals a meaningful new supply option for the region.

China’s dominance keeps manganese metal markets exposed

Global manganese metal supply remains concentrated in China. This concentration links international availability to domestic demand shifts. Recently, a major Chinese buyer absorbed a large share of annual supply, tightening exports and lifting prices.

That volatility increases procurement risk for steel and battery materials. However, European buyers still need manganese units for alloying performance. As a result, traders and mills now prioritize diversification and contract visibility.

Decentralised manganese production could strengthen steel security

GMnT positions its technology as a decentralised alternative that uses domestic feedstocks, including waste streams. This approach could reduce exposure to shipping disruption and policy shocks. It could also support circular-economy goals in steelmaking.

Scandinavian Steel expects the model to help buyers manage geopolitical risk, said trading head Erik Eriksson. Meanwhile, product qualification will determine adoption speed and contract volumes. Therefore, the next milestone is performance validation that meets European metallurgical standards.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This deal highlights how “midstream innovation” now drives critical mineral resilience. However, scale-up and qualification will decide whether Europe treats manganese metal as strategic. Therefore, watch for long-term offtake structures and financing once pilot users convert.

Indian Stainless Steel Sector Faces Headwinds from Imports and Raw Material Volatility

No comments
Indian Stainless Steel Sector Faces Headwinds from Imports and Raw Material Volatility
ISSDA

India’s stainless steel sector may face short-term turbulence amid rising imports and fluctuating input costs, says the ISSDA.

Rising Imports and Raw Material Volatility Challenge Growth

The Indian Stainless Steel Development Association (ISSDA) warns that the domestic stainless steel sector could face challenges in early FY2025-26. Volatile prices for nickel and ferro-chrome, coupled with low-cost imports from China and Vietnam, are pressuring Indian producers. According to ISSDA president Rajamani Krishnamurti, these imports threaten local manufacturers’ margins and growth momentum.

However, India’s strong domestic demand and supportive government policies may offer some market stability. Still, the industry remains vulnerable to global supply chain disruptions and raw material dependency, particularly on Indonesian nickel.

Capacity Expansion and Infrastructure Demand Drive Optimism

Despite the headwinds, India’s stainless steel industry remains optimistic for FY2025-26.
The country’s installed capacity of 7.5 million t/yr remains underutilized, with 40% unused, but new investments aim to close this gap. Growth drivers include infrastructure development, urbanization, and Make in India initiatives.

The railways, construction, and public-private infrastructure projects are expected to boost stainless steel consumption. Additionally, renewable energy technologies such as solar panels and wind turbines present promising applications for stainless steel. The sector also sees long-term growth potential from green hydrogen and smart city development projects.

The Metalnomist Commentary

India’s stainless steel sector sits at a crossroads. Structural demand remains intact, but trade dynamics and global price shifts threaten stability. How India balances domestic capacity utilization, import regulation, and supply chain resilience will shape the industry’s mid-term outlook.

China Steel Stabilisation Plan Targets Capacity Discipline and 4% Growth

No comments
China Steel Stabilisation Plan Targets Capacity Discipline and 4% Growth
China Steel

China unveiled the China steel stabilisation plan for 2025–26 to steady industry growth. The China steel stabilisation plan targets about 4% added value growth and bans new capacity. Regulators will curb unfair competition and retire inefficient production.

Market signals after the announcement

Chinese rebar futures rose, and mills lifted ex-works prices modestly. However, spot trading remained slow despite firmer sentiment. Seaborne iron ore held steady as daily pig iron output rose to about 2.41mn t/d. Meanwhile, coking coal futures ended little changed, as participants assessed policy impact.

Policymakers will tighten control of capacity and output to balance supply and demand. As a result, weaker producers should exit through market-based mechanisms. Authorities also promised investment to upgrade technology and accelerate the green energy transition. The plan seeks more high-grade steel through innovation and process improvements.

China’s near-term production trend remains soft. August crude steel output fell 0.7% year on year to 77.36mn t. January–August output declined 2.8% to 671.81mn t amid weak construction demand. In 2024, the top five provinces’ output fell 3.2% to 522.73mn t, or 52% of national totals. Earlier guidance from Beijing urged an orderly exit of outdated capacity, echoing past supply-side reforms.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The China steel stabilisation plan reasserts capacity discipline while nudging mills toward higher-grade, lower-emission output. Watch provincial enforcement, financing for upgrades, and raw-material pass-throughs to gauge durability. Short-term price firmness may fade if end-use demand fails to improve.

Europe Faces Deindustrialization Crisis Amidst Unfair Competition and Policy Struggles

No comments
Aperam

Europe’s stainless steel industry is at a critical crossroads, facing existential challenges due to high raw material costs and increasing competition from Asian producers. According to Timoteo di Maulo, CEO of Aperam, the European sector is particularly vulnerable due to its reliance on more expensive, environmentally-friendly processes, while Asian producers benefit from cheaper, carbon-intensive nickel pig iron (NPI). Speaking at the SMR International and Special Steels Conference in Rome, di Maulo warned, “Europe will die if it cannot create a level playing field,” likening the current situation to playing European football against American football, a game neither possible nor fair.

Stainless Steel Demand Decline and Unequal Standards

Market data from SMR revealed that real stainless steel demand in Europe is expected to fall by 6% in 2024, following a decline of 3% in 2022 and 8% in 2023. The gap in production methods between Europe and Asian competitors is widening, as Indian and Chinese producers are not required to use high scrap ratios, giving them a distinct cost advantage. European steelmakers, driven by stringent EU decarbonization policies, are forced to use higher-priced scrap, further straining the industry's competitiveness.

Di Maulo emphasized that while both Europe and Asia rely on ferro-nickel and NPI, European producers face additional financial burdens that threaten the industry’s long-term viability. The decarbonization measures that Europe imposes on its steelmakers are not mirrored in Asia, where efforts to reduce carbon emissions fall short of European standards.

The situation is compounded by the upcoming European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), set to take effect in 2026. Di Maulo described CBAM as an experimental policy that risks accelerating deindustrialization by limiting raw material imports while incentivizing the import of finished goods. Other industry leaders echoed these concerns, warning that CBAM, conceived as a tax but transformed into a green policy tool, is impractical and will further weaken Europe's position in global trade.

Industry Leaders Call for Pragmatic Solutions

At the same conference, Indian producer Jindal Stainless highlighted India’s dependence on NPI due to rapid industrial growth and a shortage of scrap metal. Ratan Jindal, chairman of the company, pointed out that proposed restrictions on scrap imports, such as the EU Waste Shipment Regulation, will only exacerbate this issue.

The consensus among European stainless steel executives is that CBAM, as it currently stands, is deeply flawed. Spanish producer Acerinox’s CEO, Bernardo Velazquez, stressed the difficulty of applying CBAM uniformly across Europe due to differing national tax systems. Italian steelmaker Marcegaglia’s CEO, Antonio Marcegaglia, criticized CBAM for being limited to early stages of the production cycle and for failing to address the broader economic realities of the stainless steel industry. Dimitri Menecali of Arvedi AST added that without addressing Scope 3 emissions—those created further down the supply chain—CBAM would not effectively promote sustainability.

The industry is calling for more coordinated policies and international alliances to ensure Europe's stainless steel sector remains competitive. As di Maulo stated, “There is a role for industrialization in Europe, in innovation, high performance, and service-oriented materials.”

Zinc Demand and Supply Expected to Rebalance in 2025

No comments
Zinc Demand and Supply Expected to Rebalance in 2025
Zinc

Recovery in Automotive, Infrastructure, and Green Energy to Boost Zinc Market

Global zinc demand is projected to rise marginally in 2025, driven by steady growth from automotive, infrastructure, and green energy sectors. According to the International Zinc Association (IZA), refined zinc demand is forecast to increase by 1%, with notable growth in India and the United States, while China and Europe show moderate gains.

Meanwhile, the zinc supply landscape is recovering after a contraction in 2024. ILZSG projects global mine supply will increase by 4.3% this year, supported by new output from the Kipushi, Tara, and Buenavista mines. However, some production sites, including Russia’s Ozernoye and the Red Dog mine in the U.S., may fall short of expectations, highlighting persistent uncertainty in the zinc supply chain.

Smelter expansions are also contributing to a long-term supply rebound. Boliden’s Odda 4.0 project in Norway is on track to reach 350,000 t/yr capacity in the second half of 2025. Additional capacity from the Nordenham smelter in Germany and new Chinese smelters will be partially offset by weaker output from facilities in Canada, Italy, Australia, Japan, and South Korea. As a result, the ILZSG forecasts a global surplus of 93,000 tonnes in 2025, reversing last year’s deficit of 62,000 tonnes.

Automotive and Green Tech to Sustain Long-Term Zinc Growth

The automotive industry remains a key driver of zinc consumption, particularly in galvanised steel for vehicle bodies. Western markets already have high galvanisation rates, while China and India are rapidly catching up. The IZA forecasts a 22% increase in auto-sector zinc use by 2030, translating to an additional 140,000 tonnes of demand.

India’s rapid urban development and China’s robust manufacturing output are also boosting zinc demand across infrastructure and consumer goods. In Europe, public investment in infrastructure and defence, especially in Germany, is expected to support a moderate recovery in zinc usage from late 2025 onward.

Green energy technologies — including wind, solar, and battery systems — are also emerging as major zinc consumers. The IZA projects demand from green tech will exceed 652,000 tonnes by 2030, with more than $1 billion already invested in zinc-based energy storage systems.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Zinc's supply-demand fundamentals are gradually stabilizing, with rising industrial and green-tech consumption offsetting geopolitical and logistical risks. The rebound in mine and smelter capacity suggests a structurally balanced market may return by 2025. However, long-term resilience will depend on investment in both primary production and recycling infrastructure.

China 2026 economic policy direction signals metals demand lift

No comments
China 2026 economic policy direction signals metals demand lift
China

China’s top leadership set China 2026 economic policy direction after a high-level meeting today. The meeting backed a moderately loose stance. It also pushed faster green energy development. As a result, China 2026 economic policy direction points to higher demand for industrial inputs.

The meeting called for flexible use of policy tools. Leaders cited reserve requirement reductions and interest rate cuts. Therefore, China 2026 economic policy direction could lower financing costs. It could also support investment and construction activity.

Easier money can pull forward infrastructure and materials demand

Policy easing can boost national strategic projects and infrastructure builds. It can also support urban renewal spending. Consequently, demand can rise for steel, cement, and non-ferrous metals. Energy consumption can also climb.

Lower rates can speed inventory liquidation across bulk commodities. Therefore, spot availability can tighten faster than expected. That dynamic can help underpin commodity prices. However, the scale depends on execution details.

Green transition and AI add a new layer to supply chain signals

The meeting reaffirmed the green energy transition goal. It urged faster construction of new energy systems. It also promoted broader green electricity use. Meanwhile, it highlighted strengthening the national carbon emissions trading market.

Leaders also emphasized accelerating artificial intelligence development. They also signaled support for real estate stabilization. As a result, downstream demand for copper, aluminum, and specialty materials can improve. However, markets will wait for concrete policy specifics.

The policy signal followed comments from the International Monetary Fund in Beijing on 10 December. The IMF noted resilience despite challenges. It also forecast 5% growth for 2025. China’s GDP growth slowed to 4.8% in July–September. However, January–September growth reached 5.2%.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China’s policy stance matters most for metals through construction momentum and credit availability. However, green power expansion can shift demand toward copper, aluminum, and grid materials. Therefore, watch the first quarter policy details for real volume signals.

SSAB Delays Lulea Fossil-Free Steel Mill Project by One Year

No comments
SSAB Delays Lulea Fossil-Free Steel Mill Project by One Year
SSAB

Electricity Supply Delays Impact Lulea Mini-Mill Timeline

Swedish steelmaker SSAB has postponed the transformation of its Lulea facility into a fossil-free mini-mill by one year. The delay is attributed to setbacks in securing sufficient electricity supply, caused by regional grid upgrade issues. Construction of key substations has been hindered by outage planning problems, leaving the site without the power needed to operate its electric arc furnaces (EAF).

Investment and Production Targets at Risk

SSAB initially approved a €4.5bn investment in January 2022 to build the new mini-mill, replacing its existing blast furnace-based production. The facility will feature two EAFs, a direct strip rolling mill, and a cold rolling line for automotive steels. Once operational, the site is expected to produce 2.5mn t/yr of steel using both recycled scrap and fossil-free sponge iron from the Hybrid demonstration plant in Gallivare. Plans originally targeted 2028 for the first EAF to become operational, reaching full capacity in 2029. However, these milestones are now delayed by one year.

Despite the postponement, SSAB confirmed it will still move forward with EAF installation and maintain its long-term transition strategy. In late 2024, the company secured a €128mn grant from the European Commission to support the transition from coal-based production to a near net-zero emission system, reinforcing its commitment to sustainability despite the temporary setback.

The Metalnomist Commentary

SSAB’s delay underscores the critical role of reliable electricity infrastructure in steel sector decarbonisation. Without timely grid upgrades, even large investments risk losing momentum. The company’s continued push toward fossil-free steel highlights both the opportunities and challenges of Europe’s green industrial transition.