Teck Arizona Copper Spin-Out Preserves Optional Supply Upside

Kodiak Copper

Teck Arizona copper spin-out plans show how major miners are trying to retain long-term exposure to copper growth without committing near-term development capital. Teck Resources and junior explorer Kodiak Copper plan to place two lightly drilled Arizona copper projects into a new listed exploration company.

The Teck Arizona copper spin-out would combine Teck’s Copper Hill asset with Kodiak’s Mohave project under Kay Copper, a US-focused exploration vehicle. The new company would be positioned to drill and advance the assets, but any production would remain years away.

The Teck Arizona copper spin-out is modest compared with Teck’s larger strategic moves, including its planned merger with Anglo American. However, it fits a copper market increasingly focused on optional supply, future scarcity and the difficulty of bringing new mines into production.

The structure allows Teck to keep exposure to potential US copper upside while shifting exploration risk and funding needs to outside investors. For Kodiak, the transaction creates a clearer platform around Arizona copper exploration.

Kay Copper Gives Teck Exposure Without Near-Term Capital Pressure

Kay Copper would hold two early-stage Arizona copper projects that have not seen recent drilling. This means the assets are still far from any development decision, resource definition or mine construction timeline.

For Teck, that distance matters. The company can preserve future upside while focusing capital on larger, more advanced priorities. A spin-out also gives investors a dedicated vehicle for exploration risk that may not fit inside a larger producer’s near-term capital plan.

This is a practical response to the copper market. Demand from grids, electric vehicles, data centres and industrial electrification continues to strengthen the long-term case for copper.

At the same time, new copper supply remains difficult to build. Permitting delays, lower grades, higher capital intensity and community approval challenges have extended project timelines across the industry.

Arizona remains strategically relevant because the US wants more domestic copper supply. But early-stage projects still need drilling, studies, permitting, financing and infrastructure before they can become real tonnes.

The Kay Copper structure therefore does not solve near-term supply tightness. It creates an option on future US copper production in the 2030s.

Copper Market Rewards Optionality as New Supply Lags

The deal reflects a broader shift in copper strategy. Companies are increasingly trying to hold undeveloped assets because future supply is becoming more valuable.

Physical copper availability is already under closer scrutiny as demand rises from electrification and power infrastructure. The market is also becoming more policy-driven, especially in the US, where copper is increasingly linked to industrial security and domestic manufacturing.

In that environment, even early-stage assets can attract interest. They may not produce soon, but they offer exposure to a future market where permitted copper projects could carry a stronger strategic premium.

The transaction also shows how larger miners can use junior vehicles to advance non-core exploration assets. This allows capital markets to fund drilling while the major retains some upside.

For investors, the risk remains high. Copper Hill and Mohave are lightly drilled, and any production would not arrive until the 2030s at the earliest. Exploration success, permitting and project economics are still unproven.

For the copper sector, however, the message is clear. Companies do not want to lose optional copper positions in stable jurisdictions, even when those projects are not ready for development.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Teck’s Arizona spin-out is small in tonnage terms but meaningful in market psychology. In a copper market worried about future supply, even distant exploration assets can become strategic options.

ICSG Copper Surplus Forecast Challenges Bullish Near-Term Market Narrative

Copper

ICSG copper surplus forecast has shifted the refined copper market outlook from deficit to surplus, challenging the more bullish tone around copper prices and strategic demand. The International Copper Study Group now expects a refined copper surplus of 96,000t in 2026 and 377,000t in 2027.

The revision marks a major change from ICSG’s October outlook, which had projected a 150,000t deficit for 2026. The new ICSG copper surplus forecast reflects weaker-than-expected demand growth and stronger secondary refined copper output.

The refined copper market is still exposed to mine disruption, lower ore grades and geopolitical risk. However, the latest forecast suggests that scrap-based production and slower consumption can offset some of the tightness from constrained mine supply.

ICSG expects global adjusted mine production to reach 23.559mn t in 2026 and 24.103mn t in 2027. Adjusted refined production is forecast at 28.76mn t in 2026 and 29.613mn t in 2027, while refined usage is expected at 28.664mn t and 29.236mn t.

Secondary Output and Slower Demand Ease Refined Copper Tightness

The biggest change in the ICSG copper surplus forecast comes from the refined side of the market. Stronger secondary output is expected to help balance constrained primary supply.

Refined copper production is forecast to grow by only 0.4% in 2026 before rising by 3% in 2027. Constrained concentrate availability will limit primary electrolytic growth this year, but solvent extraction-electrowinning and scrap-based output should provide support.

For 2027, ICSG expects primary refined copper production to rise by 2.3%, while secondary refined production increases by 5.7%. This gives scrap a larger role in balancing the market.

This matters because copper supply discussions often focus heavily on mines. But refined copper availability also depends on scrap collection, processing economics, smelter operations, SX-EW output and regional refined production.

Demand growth has also been revised lower. ICSG now expects refined usage to increase by 1.6% in 2026, down from its previous 2.1% forecast.

The downgrade reflects uncertainty from the Middle East conflict and disrupted trade flows. Chinese refined copper usage is expected to rise by 1.9% in 2026, while demand outside China grows by 1.3%.

Global refined usage is forecast to rise by 2% in 2027. Asia will remain the main growth engine, while EU and Japanese consumption are expected to stay subdued.

Asia outside Asean and CIS states will remain by far the largest refined copper-consuming region. Usage is projected at 20.469mn t in 2026 and 20.907mn t in 2027.

Mine Supply Risks Still Support Copper’s Strategic Value

ICSG’s near-term surplus forecast does not remove copper’s longer-term supply risk. The group revised down its 2026 mine production growth forecast to 1.6% from 2.3%, citing weaker growth in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Chile and Indonesia.

Output at Grasberg in Indonesia and Kamoa in the DRC remains constrained after major incidents in 2025. These disruptions show how quickly copper mine supply can tighten when large assets underperform.

Mine production growth is expected to recover to 2.3% in 2027. ICSG expects support from Chile, Zambia, Indonesia and the DRC, along with ramp-ups at Oyu Tolgoi in Mongolia, Malmyz in Russia, Julong in China and Almalyk in Uzbekistan.

Still, mine supply remains structurally difficult. Declining ore grades, slow permitting, higher capital intensity and longer project timelines continue to limit how quickly the industry can respond to higher prices.

Copper demand also retains strong strategic drivers. Energy transition investment, grid expansion, urbanisation, digitalisation, data centres and new semi-finished product capacity should continue to support long-term consumption.

This creates a split market narrative. On paper, refined copper may move into surplus in 2026 and 2027. Strategically, copper remains central to electrification, artificial intelligence infrastructure, manufacturing and industrial policy.

ICSG also warned that actual balances could diverge from forecasts. Its Chinese apparent demand calculation excludes changes in unreported stocks, including State Reserve Bureau, producer, consumer, trader and bonded inventories.

That caveat is important. Copper inventories can move through hidden channels, making the refined market appear looser or tighter than reported balances suggest.

The ICSG copper surplus forecast therefore does not end the bullish long-term copper case. It does, however, caution against assuming immediate refined scarcity when secondary supply is rising and demand outside China remains soft.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The ICSG copper surplus forecast shows that copper’s strategic story and near-term balance sheet can move in different directions. Data centres, grids and electrification support the long-term thesis, but scrap growth and weaker demand may keep the refined market looser than bullish headlines suggest.

Capstone Mantoverde Strike Ends as Copper Output Recovery Begins

Capstone Copper

Capstone Mantoverde strike ends after a month-long labour disruption at the Chilean copper-gold mine. Union #2 ratified a new three-year collective bargaining agreement. That approval allows the operation to begin ramping back toward full production. As a result, Capstone Mantoverde strike ends at an important moment for an already tight copper market.

The dispute had a real production impact. Union #2 represents about 645 workers, roughly half of Mantoverde’s direct workforce. During the strike, the mine operated at about 55pc of normal production levels. Therefore, Capstone Mantoverde strike ends with the company now focused on restoring stable output safely and quickly.

This matters because Mantoverde is not a marginal asset. The mine produced 62,308t of copper in concentrate and 32,807t of copper cathode in 2025. That accounted for about 0.4pc of global copper output. Consequently, the end of the strike reduces one source of pressure in Chile copper supply.

Mantoverde Copper Mine Still Faces Operational Vulnerabilities

Mantoverde copper mine is now moving past labour disruption, but operational risk has not disappeared. The site depends on a coastal desalination plant located about 40km away. Earlier disruptions at that facility restricted water supply and forced Capstone to curtail some processing activity. As a result, Mantoverde remains exposed to infrastructure as well as labour risk.

That combination makes the site more complex than a normal strike recovery story. Even with all four union agreements now secured, the mine still needs consistent water access and stable operations. Capstone said its priority is to restore output safely and efficiently. Therefore, the next phase will depend on execution, not only labour peace.

The ownership structure also adds strategic depth. Capstone holds a 70pc stake in Mantoverde, while Mitsubishi Materials owns the remaining 30pc. That makes the asset important not only for Capstone’s portfolio, but also for broader international copper supply relationships. Meanwhile, the company did not disclose the financial terms of the revised labour deal.

Copper Market Tightness Makes the Restart More Important

Copper market tightness is the bigger reason this strike matters. The market is expected to be more sensitive to unplanned disruptions in 2026 than in prior years. Both cathode and concentrate markets are already facing tighter conditions after production downgrades by major producers. Consequently, even partial production losses can carry more weight.

Recent copper price behavior reinforces that point. Prices have stayed volatile amid speculative flows, macro uncertainty, and concentrate market tightness. Three-month copper settled at $12,905/t in the article’s market context. Therefore, the end of the Mantoverde strike may help sentiment, even if it does not fully change the broader market balance.

For Capstone, the immediate task is clear. The company must move from partial output back to stable operating rates without new disruptions. For the market, the message is also clear. In a tighter copper environment, every operational recovery matters more than before.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This strike settlement matters because the copper market now reacts more sharply to operational setbacks and recoveries. Mantoverde is not large enough to reset global pricing alone, but it is large enough to matter in a tighter year. If Capstone restores full output smoothly, the market will treat that as a small but meaningful supply relief.

Global Refined Copper Market Recorded January Surplus as Scrap Output Rose

Copper Coil

Global refined copper market data showed a January surplus as higher mine production and stronger secondary output outweighed moderate demand growth. The market recorded a surplus of around 17,000t, down from about 60,000t in January a year earlier.

The surplus was estimated at around 16,000t after adjusting for changes in Chinese bonded stocks. This indicated that the global refined copper market remained broadly balanced, but rising inventories and limited demand momentum prevented a tighter supply picture.

The global refined copper market was supported by higher mine output in Peru and Mongolia, while stronger scrap-based refined production in China lifted secondary supply. However, disruptions in Chile, Indonesia and parts of the DRC continued to limit a broader recovery in primary supply.

Mine Growth and Secondary Production Offset Supply Disruptions

Global mine production increased by 2.2% on the year to about 1.92mn t in January. Peru’s output rose by 3%, supported by higher production at Antamina, Las Bambas, Antapaccay and Toromocho.

Mongolia delivered a much stronger increase of around 35% after the continued ramp-up of the Oyu Tolgoi underground project. This helped offset weaker output in Chile, where mine production fell by around 3%.

Indonesian production remained significantly lower after the 2025 mud rush incident at Grasberg. In the DRC, overall output rose by about 1% as solvent extraction and electrowinning growth offset a sharp decline in concentrate output linked to disruption at Kamoa.

Global refined copper production increased by around 1% to 2.43mn t. Primary production declined by 1.4% to 1.98mn t, while secondary production rose by about 11% to roughly 445,000t, mainly because of higher scrap-based production in China.

Inventories and Modest Demand Growth Limited Market Tightness

Global apparent refined copper usage rose by around 2.5% to about 2.41mn t in January. Demand growth was led by regions outside China, with Asia, the Middle East and north Africa increasing usage by about 4%.

Chinese apparent demand grew by around 1%, but net refined copper imports into China fell by 44%. This mattered because China accounted for 58% of global refined copper usage.

Inventory growth reinforced the perception of adequate supply. Global refined copper stocks reached around 1.93mn t by the end of January, while combined exchange inventories climbed to about 1.2mn t by the end of February, the highest level since March 2003.

The data showed that supply disruptions had not disappeared, but mine ramp-ups and stronger secondary copper production were enough to offset losses. As a result, the global refined copper market stayed balanced, with rising stocks limiting near-term bullish pressure.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Copper’s January surplus showed that scrap and new mine capacity can still soften the impact of regional disruptions. The key question is whether rising inventories reflect temporary timing effects or weaker underlying demand in a market still waiting for stronger electrification-led consumption.

US Copper Flows Shift West as Washington Targets African Supply Chains

Copper

US copper flows are becoming a strategic policy priority as Washington seeks to redirect African copper away from China-oriented supply chains and into western manufacturing networks. The shift shows how copper is moving beyond its traditional role as an industrial commodity.

US policymakers are pursuing a dual strategy. They want to accelerate domestic copper projects and processing while also securing international copper sources that can feed US and allied supply chains faster.

The Democratic Republic of Congo has become central to this effort. The country offers high-quality resources and faster supply potential than many long-dated greenfield copper projects.

US copper flows are therefore being reshaped through offtake agreements, financing structures, infrastructure plans and strategic partnerships. The goal is to create secure mine-to-end-use supply chains that support American manufacturing and reduce dependence on China-linked material routes.

African Copper Becomes a Strategic Supply Target

The DRC’s copper output has historically moved east into Chinese-controlled or China-oriented value chains. Washington now wants to build alternative routes that connect African copper to the US and allied industrial base.

This is not only about copper cathode or concentrate volumes. It is about who controls logistics, financing, offtake, processing and final market access.

The US is already using state-backed financing and trading structures to compete for African copper and cobalt. The DRC, Zambia and Guinea are emerging as priority jurisdictions in this wider mineral strategy.

Glencore’s possible sale of a 40% stake in two DRC copper-cobalt mines to the US-backed Orion Critical Mineral Consortium shows how policy and capital are beginning to move together. More US interest is also emerging in Congolese copper-cobalt, manganese, gold and lithium assets.

This matters because China has built deep influence across African mining, processing and trading channels. Western buyers cannot change copper flows only by expressing demand. They need financing, infrastructure, political support and long-term offtake commitments.

The US strategy also reflects a broader recognition that copper supply security cannot rely only on domestic mines. US copper resources are substantial, including brownfield leach opportunities and idle stockpiles, but permitting remains a major constraint.

International supply partnerships can move faster than many US projects. That makes African copper strategically valuable as Washington tries to support manufacturing, grid expansion, defence supply chains and electrification.

Inventory Distortions Change Copper Market Economics

US copper flows are also being affected by tariff expectations and inventory shifts. Around 1.9mn-2mn t of copper metal inventory is now sitting globally, with roughly 1.2mn t located in the US.

That is an unusually high share because the US consumes about 2mn t/yr, while China consumes roughly 15mn t/yr. The result is a market where headline global stocks look large, but copper outside the US can feel much tighter.

This inventory concentration changes copper economics. The same copper unit can carry different value depending on location, policy exposure, tariff risk and available delivery route.

That marks a major shift from the older copper market model. Copper was once priced mainly around construction cycles, manufacturing demand and visible exchange stocks. It is now increasingly priced around jurisdiction, logistics and strategic access.

The CME-LME arbitrage has reopened to encourage flows into the US. This reflects how policy expectations can pull metal across regions even when global balances appear more comfortable.

Physical demand remains supportive. Chinese demand has stayed resilient, Yangshan premiums have strengthened, and Shanghai inventories have continued to draw. These signals suggest that the broader copper market remains tighter than simple stock numbers imply.

Copper’s role in grids, electrification and data centres has also changed how governments view the metal. Copper is now becoming a strategic asset for industrial policy, not only a material input for construction and manufacturing.

The biggest commercial opportunities may therefore shift from pure price arbitrage to control over flows. Traders, miners and governments will increasingly compete through logistics, financing, offtake and jurisdictional positioning.

US copper flows will remain central to that competition. The race is no longer only about producing more copper. It is about deciding where copper goes, who processes it and which industrial systems it supports.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Copper is becoming a policy metal because electrification has turned physical access into a strategic advantage. The next copper cycle will not be defined only by price, but by who controls African supply routes, financing and end-use allocation.

CMOC Copper Output Rises as DRC Mines Strengthen China Supply

CMOC

CMOC copper output increased in the first quarter of 2026 as higher production from the company’s Democratic Republic of Congo copper-cobalt mines lifted supply. The Chinese diversified metals producer produced 187,880t of copper in January-March, up 10% from a year earlier.

CMOC copper output was supported by stronger production at the Tenke Fungurume and Kisanfu mines. These assets are central to China’s copper and cobalt feedstock security because they supply large volumes of cathode and intermediate material from one of the world’s most important copper-cobalt districts.

CMOC copper output is expected to remain a major market focus this year. The company is targeting 760,000-820,000t of copper production in 2026, after producing 741,100t in 2025.

The result reinforces the DRC’s role as China’s largest imported copper cathode source. China imported 275,359t of copper cathode from the DRC in the first quarter, equal to 37.5% of total imports.

Tenke and Kisanfu Anchor CMOC’s Copper Growth

CMOC’s first-quarter copper growth reflects the scale and strategic importance of its DRC operations. Tenke Fungurume and Kisanfu remain core assets for the company’s copper-cobalt portfolio.

The company plans to expand output at Kisanfu by adding 100,000 t/yr of copper cathode capacity. Completion is targeted for 2027.

The expansion could also lift cobalt capacity. CMOC has not disclosed the planned increase, but market participants expect Kisanfu’s cobalt capacity to rise by more than 30,000 t/yr.

This matters because copper and cobalt are increasingly linked in DRC project economics. Higher copper output can bring additional cobalt units into the market, depending on ore composition, processing rates and export rules.

The London Metal Exchange approval of CMOC’s TFM-1 copper cathode brand adds another layer of market significance. The brand, produced at Tenke Fungurume, was approved for listing on 27 March and has a registered production capacity of 270,000 t/yr.

Exchange approval improves brand visibility and market acceptance. It can also support trade liquidity, financing and customer confidence for DRC-origin copper cathode.
China’s copper cathode import structure shows why this is important. The DRC already supplies more than one-third of China’s imported cathode, making Congolese supply critical to Chinese refined copper availability.

The China grade-A copper cathode premium was steady at $55-70/t cif Shanghai on 23 April. The range narrowed from $55-75/t a week earlier, showing a relatively stable but cautious spot market.

Cobalt Output Stays Flat as Quotas Restrict Feedstock Flows

CMOC’s cobalt production was largely unchanged in the first quarter. The company produced 30,508t of cobalt, up only 0.3% from a year earlier.

The company set its 2026 cobalt output guidance at 100,000-120,000t. That is broadly stable against 117,549t produced in 2025.

The flat cobalt outlook reflects a more complicated market. The DRC suspended cobalt feedstock exports from 22 February to 15 October 2025 before moving to a quota-based export system for the fourth quarter of 2025 and for 2026-27.

Administrative delays have slowed the quota system. The DRC extended fourth-quarter 2025 quotas to 31 March 2026 because of slow processing.

The effect on Chinese imports has been severe. China imported only 1,278t cobalt metal equivalent of cobalt intermediate feedstock in January-February, down 96% from a year earlier.

Cobalt hydroxide prices remained stable at $25.95-26.10/lb cif China on 23 April. But the stability masks a market still shaped by restricted DRC export flows, delayed allocations and uncertainty over quota administration.

For CMOC, the copper side of the portfolio is showing clear growth. The cobalt side remains more exposed to policy risk, export controls and administrative timing in the DRC.

The Kisanfu expansion could increase future cobalt availability, but the market impact will depend on whether DRC export rules allow material to move smoothly to downstream refiners.

The Metalnomist Commentary

CMOC’s first-quarter results show that DRC copper remains essential to China’s refined copper supply, while cobalt is increasingly constrained by policy rather than production alone. The strategic issue is no longer just mine output, but whether export quotas, brand approvals and logistics can keep critical metal flows moving.

Copper Market Deficit 2026: ICSG Signals Faster-Than-Expected Tightening

Copper

The copper market deficit 2026 is now central to ICSG’s latest forecast. The group now expects a 150,000t refined shortfall in 2026 after a 178,000t surplus in 2025. This copper market deficit 2026 outlook represents a sharp reversal from its April projection of a 209,000t surplus. The shift reflects weaker mine output and reduced concentrate availability from key producers such as Indonesia and the DRC. As a result, refined supply growth slows just as structural demand continues to build.

Slower mine growth and constrained smelting tighten copper balance

ICSG now sees global mine production rising by only 1.4pc in 2025 and 2.3pc in 2026. The downgrade for 2025 follows disruptions at Grasberg in Indonesia and Kamoa in the DRC. However, growth will still come from ramp-ups at Oyu Tolgoi, Russia’s Malmyz and smaller projects in Brazil, Iran, Ecuador and Morocco. The group expects a broader recovery in Chilean, Peruvian and Zambian output in 2026. Meanwhile, refined production is forecast to rise by 3.4pc in 2025 but only 0.9pc in 2026. The stronger 2025 growth reflects Chinese smelting expansion and new plants in the DRC, India and Indonesia. Primary refined output should grow 3pc in 2025, while scrap-based secondary output grows 4.5pc. However, concentrate tightness will cap electrolytic output in 2026, partly offset by more secondary production from recycling projects. This supply picture underpins the copper market deficit 2026 narrative, with mine and smelter constraints offsetting previous expectations of surplus.

Energy transition demand deepens copper market deficit 2026 risk

Global refined copper usage is forecast to grow by 3pc in 2025 and 2.1pc in 2026. China remains the key demand engine, accounting for about 58pc of global usage. Chinese demand is expected to rise by 3.3pc in 2025 and 1pc in 2026. Demand in the rest of the world should grow by 2.5pc next year, led by Asia, while the EU and Japan remain subdued. Structural demand drivers remain intact despite macro uncertainty. Manufacturing recovery, energy transition investment and digitalisation all support long-term consumption. Expanding semis capacity in India and other developing economies further reinforces baseline growth. ICSG stresses that its balances exclude changes in unreported Chinese or State Reserve Bureau stocks. Those stock movements can materially alter realised tightness in any single year. Even so, the combination of constrained mine supply and persistent structural demand implies tightening fundamentals. For investors and producers, the copper market deficit 2026 outlook signals growing sensitivity to new disruptions and project delays.

The Metalnomist Commentary

ICSG’s revised numbers confirm that the era of easy copper surpluses is ending faster than many expected. The copper market deficit 2026 projection highlights how modest supply shocks can flip balances in a structurally tight system. For miners, smelters and OEMs, this reinforces the need to secure long-term feedstock and expand recycling before deficits become the new normal.

Copper Supply Chain Fragility Is Underpriced Despite Price Rally

Ivanhoe

Copper supply chain risk is still being underpriced even after London Metal Exchange prices rallied above $13,000/t, according to Ivanhoe Mines chairman Robert Friedland. He warned that higher prices alone will not quickly unlock new mine investment or solve the operational bottlenecks now shaping copper supply.

The copper supply chain is facing a more complex problem than headline market balances suggest. Friedland pointed to sulphur, sulphuric acid, diesel and other critical inputs as increasingly important constraints for mining operations, especially in Africa.

The copper supply chain is particularly exposed in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where a large share of production depends on acid leaching. If sulphuric acid availability tightens further, Friedland said about half of the DRC’s low-grade leached copper could be at risk unless higher copper prices offset sharply higher acid costs.

This warning comes as the Middle East conflict affects copper markets indirectly. The immediate threat is not concentrate supply, but sulphur-linked cost inflation that can raise operating costs for solvent extraction and leaching operations.

Sulphuric Acid and Diesel Risks Expose Mining Cost Vulnerability

Sulphuric acid has become a central issue for copper supply because much of the DRC’s production relies on acid leaching. A prolonged disruption in sulphur flows could affect roughly 3mn t/yr of DRC copper output, making the country one of the most exposed parts of the global copper market.

The DRC’s vulnerability is different from that of traditional concentrate producers. Concentrate supply depends on mining, milling, logistics and smelter demand. Leached copper also depends on steady sulphur or sulphuric acid access, which creates another layer of supply-chain risk.

Ivanhoe’s Kamoa-Kakula complex is unusually positioned because it produces sulphuric acid as a by-product rather than relying only on external supply. The operation produced more than 100,000t of sulphuric acid in the first quarter of 2026, with annual output expected to reach 600,000-700,000 t/yr once the new smelter is fully ramped up.

That acid production gives Ivanhoe a strategic advantage. It can reduce exposure to imported acid costs while supporting copper output in a market where other DRC producers may face tighter reagent availability.

Diesel is another operational risk. Remote mines depend on diesel for haulage, power generation and logistics, especially where grid access is weak or transport routes are long.

Friedland said highly exposed mining firms should consider securing up to a year of diesel supply. He also argued that the DRC may be less vulnerable than some expect because refined products can arrive through India, Nigeria and southern Africa.

Still, the full operational impact may not yet be visible. Supply-chain shocks often appear first through higher costs, longer lead times and working-capital pressure before they become production losses.

This is why the copper market may be misreading risk. Visible inventories and annual balances can suggest moderate surplus, while the physical supply chain becomes more fragile beneath the surface.

A copper price above $13,000/t helps margins, but it does not immediately create acid, diesel, spare parts, qualified labour or new mine capacity. Mine investment still depends on permitting, capital cost, political risk and long development timelines.

AI, Data Centres and Critical Metals Raise Copper’s Strategic Value

Friedland linked copper’s long-term importance directly to electrification, cooling systems, data centres and artificial intelligence. These sectors are turning copper from a conventional industrial metal into a strategic infrastructure material.

AI data centres need large amounts of power infrastructure. That means more copper for grids, substations, transformers, cooling systems, cabling, backup power and electrical distribution.

The growth of AI also reinforces demand for metals beyond copper. Friedland highlighted gallium, scandium, dysprosium, rhenium and tantalum as thinly traded materials with low liquidity but high industrial dependence.

This is an important market signal. The next phase of industrial competition will not depend only on bulk metals. It will also depend on access to small-volume strategic materials that support semiconductors, aerospace, defence, magnets and high-performance alloys.

Copper remains the anchor metal because it connects electrification, grid expansion, industrial automation and data infrastructure. Friedland described copper as the “king of metals” because no large-scale energy transition can move without it.

However, copper’s strategic value also exposes the market to policy pressure. The US is beginning to understand mining’s national security role more clearly, especially as domestic supply concentration and import dependence become more visible.

Market participants expect moderate global copper surpluses this year, helped by last year’s supply windfall. But US physical balances are expected to remain tight, with the CME-LME arbitrage reopening to encourage flows into the country.

That regional tightness matters. Copper may look balanced globally, while specific markets face procurement pressure because of tariffs, logistics, exchange spreads, domestic manufacturing needs or strategic stockpiling.

The broader lesson is that copper pricing must account for supply-chain resilience, not only mine output. A mine that lacks acid, fuel or logistics capacity cannot deliver metal reliably, even if ore is available.

For investors, this strengthens the value of hard assets with low obsolescence. Mines, smelters, acid plants, power infrastructure and logistics corridors are becoming more valuable as supply chains become less predictable.

For manufacturers, copper procurement is becoming a strategic function. Buyers linked to grids, data centres, defence, cooling systems and energy infrastructure will need more secure supply agreements, not only exposure to exchange prices.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Friedland’s warning cuts through the headline copper rally: the market is pricing metal, but not enough supply-chain fragility. Copper’s next constraint may come less from ore availability and more from acid, diesel, logistics and the minor metals needed to build the electrified economy.

Copper as a Macro Hedge Is Rewriting the Market Narrative

Copper

Copper as a macro hedge is changing how the market behaves in 2026. Sucden argues that copper now trades less like a pure industrial metal. It increasingly moves with positioning, tariffs, and broader macro sentiment. As a result, copper as a macro hedge is driving sharper and less linear price action.

The shift is visible in the latest rally. Three-month LME copper briefly moved above $14,000/t before easing back slightly. The move came during Asian trading and reflected heavy speculative buying. Therefore, copper price volatility is no longer being driven only by physical demand.

This matters because the physical backdrop still looks mixed. China continues to show softer import premiums and a looser forward curve. Nearby availability does not look especially tight. However, speculative flows and fading producer hedging have left the market more exposed to rapid repricing.

Speculative Copper Rally Has Pushed Prices Beyond Fundamental Value

The speculative copper rally has extended well beyond what Sucden sees as fair value. The broker places that range at about $10,500-11,500/t. Yet prices have moved much higher as systematic flows entered hard assets. Consequently, copper now behaves more like gold and silver during periods of macro stress.

Tariff fears have amplified that move. US stock builds reflect concern over possible refined copper tariffs. Even if tariffs are never fully imposed, the market still has to price the risk. As a result, regional flows and inventory behavior remain distorted.

Liquidity conditions have also become more fragile. Higher funding costs and exchange margin hikes have reduced balance-sheet capacity. That makes price moves more abrupt and less orderly. Meanwhile, options activity at higher strike levels is reinforcing the speculative tone.

Copper Market Surplus Looks Thin, but Correction Risk Is Rising

The copper market surplus expected for 2026 remains very small. Sucden sees only a thin surplus of around 50,000t. That leaves the market highly sensitive to any new mine disruption or downgrade. Therefore, the medium-term copper story still supports structurally firm prices.

Longer term, the fundamentals remain constructive. Mine growth in Chile and Peru is struggling to keep pace with electrification demand. Data centres and grid investment are adding further support. Meanwhile, new project pipelines remain constrained by underinvestment and long lead times.

However, the biggest risk may now be a reversal in macro sentiment. If the tariff premium fades and speculative positioning unwinds, prices could fall sharply. A broader loss of confidence, including in the AI-led investment narrative, could trigger that shift. Consequently, copper price volatility may remain extreme even if long-term fundamentals stay supportive.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Copper is no longer trading only on mine supply and industrial demand. It is now absorbing the same macro flows that once mostly lifted gold and silver. That can keep prices elevated, but it also makes the market more vulnerable to sharp corrections when sentiment turns.

Copper Market Faces Volatility and Uncertainty in 2025

Copper

The U.S. copper market is poised for continued volatility in 2025, influenced by Chinese demand trends, electric vehicle (EV) rollouts, and shifting U.S. monetary policy. Copper prices surged in mid-2024, reaching a record high of $5.106/lb on May 21, before retreating to an average of $4.33/lb in the second half of the year.

Market participants expect these factors, along with potential import tariffs under President-elect Donald Trump, to shape price movements throughout 2025. Trade tensions, interest rate decisions, and inflationary pressures will further add to the market’s uncertainty.

Macroeconomic Pressures and Strong Dollar Impact

A strong U.S. dollar and Federal Reserve policy shifts remain key concerns for copper traders. The DXY dollar index surged to 108.2 on December 19, the highest since November 2022, following signals from the Federal Reserve that interest rate cuts in 2025 may be limited to 50 basis points rather than the previously expected 100 basis points.

A stronger dollar generally weakens copper demand, making the metal more expensive for holders of other currencies. Additionally, tariffs and inflationary pressures could force the Fed to slow rate cuts or even increase interest rates, further strengthening the dollar and weighing on copper prices.

Trade policy uncertainty remains a major factor, as Trump’s proposed import tariffs could prompt retaliatory measures, raising costs and curbing global copper demand.

EV Market Uncertainty Weighs on Copper Demand

While the renewable energy sector—including wind and solar projects—is expected to support copper demand, the EV sector faces growth concerns. Automakers such as GM, Ford, and Toyota have delayed full EV rollouts, opting to shift toward hybrids.

Each EV requires approximately 183 lbs of copper, nearly four times more than a traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. A slower EV adoption rate could dampen near-term copper demand growth, despite the long-term outlook remaining strong.

Diverging Copper Price Forecasts for 2025

Market analysts are split on copper’s 2025 price outlook, though most agree that the market will likely enter a deficit by 2026 due to growing renewable energy demand.

• Goldman Sachs forecasts $4.61/lb in 2025, citing potential stimulus-driven upside risks and trade-related downside risks.

• Citigroup projects a lower $3.97/lb, while Bank of America estimates $4.28/lb.

• UBS predicts a range of $4.76-$4.99/lb, signaling a bullish outlook compared to other institutions.

With geopolitical uncertainties, currency fluctuations, and shifting industrial demand, 2025 is shaping up to be a pivotal transition year for the copper market.

Refined Copper Flows Split Between US Stock-Build and China Demand Recovery

US Copper

Refined copper flows are being pulled in two directions as US tariff risk draws cathode into Comex warehouses while China returns to the seaborne market after a sharp fall in domestic inventories. The result is not a simple global shortage, but a more complex location-driven contest for metal.

Refined copper flows were distorted in the first quarter by financial investor activity, US policy uncertainty and weak Chinese import economics. That balance is now shifting as China’s import arbitrage reopens, while US buyers and traders continue to position ahead of possible refined copper tariffs.

Refined copper flows are therefore becoming more strategic. The same unit of cathode can carry different value depending on whether it sits in the US, China, bonded warehouses or LME storage.

This market structure matters because copper is no longer priced only against broad industrial demand. Tariff risk, warehouse location, arbitrage spreads, strategic stock-building and smelter economics are now shaping physical trade.

US Tariff Risk Keeps Pulling Copper Into Comex

US copper inventories continue to build as tariff uncertainty supports a location premium. Comex warehouse stocks rose to 615,852 short tons on 4 May, up 5% from 586,563t on 14 April.

This build does not necessarily show stronger underlying US consumption. It shows that market participants are willing to pay to position metal inside the US before potential import tariff announcements this summer.

US refined copper and unwrought copper alloy imports under HS 7403 reached 382,952t in January-February 2026. That was up 184% from 134,754t a year earlier.

The longer trend is even clearer. Imports over March 2025-February 2026 more than doubled to 1.9mn t from 923,701t in the previous 12-month period.

Arbitrage has reinforced the flow. The LME cash official to Comex cash copper arbitrage widened to minus $385.14/t on 1 May from minus $261.24/t on 30 April and minus $126.50/t on 29 April.

That widening spread signals a stronger US location premium. It gives traders an incentive to direct copper units into Comex warehouses rather than leave them available to other regional buyers.

This has important supply-chain implications. A high level of visible copper stock does not automatically mean metal is freely available to every market. If inventories are concentrated in one jurisdiction for policy reasons, other regions can tighten even while global stock numbers look comfortable.

The US stock-build is therefore a policy-driven trade flow. It reflects uncertainty over future tariff treatment, not a normal demand cycle.

For manufacturers, this creates procurement risk. Fabricators outside the US may face tighter access to marginal units if traders continue sending cathode into the American system.

For traders, location is becoming a profit centre. The value is not only in the copper price, but in where the copper is held and what policy regime applies to it.

China Import Window Reopens as Domestic Stocks Fall

China is now creating the counter pull. Shanghai Futures Exchange copper warehouse stocks fell to 201,373t on 24 April from 433,458t on 13 March.

Bonded copper stocks also slipped to 19,159t on 24 April from 22,547t on 20 March. That drawdown reopened space for imported cathode after a weak first quarter for overseas material.

China’s import arbitrage improved sharply at the end of April. The grade A copper cathode import margin rose to 427 yuan/t on 30 April from 94 yuan/t on 28 April and minus 73 yuan/t on 23 April.

If the window remains open, China’s second-quarter refined copper imports could recover from first-quarter levels. Buyers have a clearer reason to replenish domestic supply after the recent inventory draw.

However, the recovery may be uneven. High outright copper prices still limit fabricator appetite, and part of the stock draw reflects seasonal restocking after the first-quarter lull.

The wider inventory picture still does not support a broad scarcity narrative. LME copper stocks remained sizable at 398,675t, while on-warrant inventories have risen sharply since early January.

This means the market is not short everywhere. It is tight in specific locations, under specific pricing structures, and for specific buyers.

That is the core point. Refined copper flows are increasingly being shaped by regional availability rather than total visible inventory.

Smelter economics add another risk to the China outlook. Copper concentrate treatment and refining charges remain deeply negative, showing that mine supply is tight while smelting capacity remains excessive.

Chinese smelters have continued running at high rates despite negative treatment charges. High sulphuric acid by-product values have helped support operating economics.

That balance may become more fragile after China’s suspension of sulphuric acid exports from May. If more acid remains in the domestic market, smelters may face weaker by-product revenue or rising storage pressure.

If domestic acid demand cannot absorb the extra supply, some smelters may bring forward maintenance. That would tighten refined copper output later in the quarter and strengthen the case for more imports.

The refined copper market is therefore in a split-flow pattern. US policy risk is pulling copper west, while China’s inventory draw and import window are pulling metal back east.

For other regions, that creates a squeeze. Europe and other buyers may find marginal cathode harder to source even while global inventories appear adequate.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Copper is moving from a global inventory story to a location and policy story. The real risk is not that the world lacks refined copper today, but that tariff positioning, Chinese restocking and smelter economics keep redirecting the same units away from other buyers.

Copper Record High Signals Deeper Supply Stress Across Global Market

Copper

Copper record high prices on the London Metal Exchange show how quickly supply risks, regional stockbuilding and stronger Chinese demand signals are reshaping the market. Three-month LME copper settled at $14,140/t, setting a new official high and reinforcing the metal’s structural bull case.

Copper record high momentum has not come from one isolated event. It reflects a convergence of mine disruption, weak Chilean output, tight concentrate availability, sulphuric acid constraints and US tariff-related stockbuilding.

Copper record high pricing is also being supported by stronger Chinese import signals. The Yangshan copper premium rose to around $72/t, while Shanghai Futures Exchange inventories have fallen by 58% since 13 March to 181,333t.

Comex copper also traded at record levels at $6.485/lb, with the US contract holding a premium of nearly $700/t over LME copper. That spread shows how US tariff risk continues to pull refined metal into the American market.

Supply Risks Now Dominate Copper Pricing

Supply pressure remains the strongest driver behind the rally. Chile’s three largest copper producers all reported lower March output, with Codelco down by around 10%, Escondida down by nearly 16% and Collahuasi down by almost 11%.

Chile’s national copper output fell by around 9% over the same period. That decline matters because the market has limited spare mine capacity to absorb losses from the world’s largest copper-producing country.

Lower ore grades remain a structural problem. Ageing infrastructure, operational interruptions and delayed modernisation projects are also reducing the ability of major mines to respond quickly to higher prices.

Copper concentrate treatment charges are deeply negative in China, confirming the pressure on concentrate availability. Smelters are competing for feedstock while mine supply remains constrained.

Sulphur and sulphuric acid have also become more important market variables. Middle East disruption and Chinese restrictions on sulphuric acid exports are raising risks for leaching and solvent extraction-electrowinning operations.

This is especially relevant to the African copperbelt, where sulphuric acid is a critical reagent. If acid availability tightens further, production costs could rise or output could be affected in one of the world’s key copper growth regions.

Peru adds another risk point. Open-pit copper mines there depend heavily on diesel for haulage and mine movement, making sustained fuel disruption a potential operational threat.

China Demand and US Stockbuilding Split Refined Flows

China is returning as a stronger buyer of imported cathode. Falling SHFE inventories and a higher Yangshan premium suggest that domestic availability has tightened enough to revive seaborne buying interest.

China’s stronger export data also support the demand picture. April exports rose by 14.1% year on year to a record $359.44bn, beating expectations and pointing to more resilient industrial activity.

That matters for copper because electric vehicles, grid equipment, renewable energy components and battery storage all require significant copper input. Stronger industrial exports can therefore reinforce physical demand.

At the same time, US policy risk is pulling refined copper west. Tariff-related stockbuilding has created a strong Comex premium, encouraging traders to move metal into the US system.

This split is tightening ex-US availability. The US is absorbing refined units for policy protection, while China is pulling cathode back into its import market.

Fund activity has amplified the move. Trend-following money has re-entered Comex as copper broke through technical levels, making prices more sensitive to momentum flows.

The current rally may still face corrections. However, the price floor remains supported by slow mine response, fragile processing inputs and competing regional demand centres.

Copper is no longer trading only as an industrial cycle indicator. It is becoming a strategic material shaped by policy, infrastructure demand, energy transition, AI-linked power systems and supply-chain security.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Copper’s record is not just a price event; it is a signal that the supply chain is losing flexibility. The strongest warning is that mine output, processing inputs and refined metal location are all tightening at the same time.

Copper Aluminium Pricing Divergence Deepens as Middle East Shock Turns Metal-Specific

Sucden Financial

Copper aluminium pricing divergence is becoming clearer as base metal markets absorb the first shock of the Middle East conflict. Copper is shifting back toward physical flows, inventories and policy risk, while aluminium remains supported by direct disruption to Middle East supply chains.

Copper aluminium pricing divergence reflects a broader change in market behaviour. Traders are moving away from headline-led volatility and focusing more on spreads, premiums, inventories and real supply constraints.

Copper aluminium pricing divergence also shows that the base metals complex is no longer trading as one geopolitical basket. Each metal is now being priced according to its own exposure to the war, its physical balance and its ability to replace disrupted supply.

UK broker Sucden Financial said the conflict initially drove broad volatility across commodities. But that phase is fading, leaving copper and aluminium on different pricing paths.

Copper Moves From Macro Risk to Physical and Policy Pricing

Copper began the year as a macro-driven metal. Prices moved with broader risk sentiment, oil, gold and cross-asset positioning.

That relationship is now weakening. Copper is increasingly being priced through its own market signals, including Shanghai inventory drawdowns, US flow incentives, mined supply quality and sulphuric acid-related supply-chain disruption.

This shift matters because copper is no longer responding only to global growth fears or geopolitical headlines. It is being priced through physical availability and policy exposure.

The Comex premium has periodically reopened the arbitrage for copper units to move into the US. This has made the interaction between LME, Comex, inventories and US policy more important to price discovery.

Sucden said the next phase of copper pricing could be shaped by material-security concerns. These include tariff threats, incentives to hold more metal in the US and the strategic value of copper in energy infrastructure.

This is a macro-to-micro rotation. Copper is moving away from broad geopolitical trading and toward a market driven by premiums, spreads, stock locations and supply-chain constraints.

Sulphuric acid remains a key hidden risk. Copper supply from leaching operations, particularly in regions such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Chile, can be affected if acid availability tightens or costs rise.

The market still remains exposed to recession fears. A deeper economic slowdown caused by the conflict could weigh on copper demand and financial positioning.

However, copper’s resilience suggests that traders are giving greater weight to structural tightness. Supply challenges, low-quality mined material and long-term demand from grids, electrification and industrial policy continue to support the metal.

Sucden argued that copper’s long-term direction remains higher and that price dips should be bought. The structural case has not changed, while eventual dollar weakness after a conflict resolution could provide further support.

Aluminium Holds a Firmer Physical Floor After Supply Shock

Aluminium has already repriced much of the Middle East disruption. The metal briefly moved toward the upper end of its recent range as the conflict escalated, but repeated failures above $3,650/t suggest the market needs further supply deterioration to justify another major move higher.

This does not mean aluminium is weak. It means the initial panic premium has already been absorbed.

Aluminium’s support is more physical than copper’s. The disruption affects smelting, feedstock flows and export availability from the Middle East, making the supply shock more direct than headline numbers may suggest.

Sucden said aluminium remains the base metal with the clearest exposure to the Middle East war. Ex-China supply is tighter, London Metal Exchange inventories are falling and nearby spreads have moved into backwardation.

Chinese inventories have risen, but that does not fully offset the tightness outside China. Regional availability matters more when logistics, origin and delivery routes are disrupted.

Aluminium smelters also cannot restart quickly. Once production is curtailed, bringing capacity back requires time, stable power and commercial confidence.

Elevated energy prices add another layer of cost support. Even if the war de-escalates, smelters and downstream producers may still face a higher operating cost base.

Sucden said de-escalation could initially push aluminium prices toward $3,400/t. But any decline may prove short-lived if physical tightness remains.

This gives aluminium limited immediate upside but also limited downside. The market has already priced much of the shock, yet replacement supply is not easy to find.

The broader implication is that aluminium is trading a tighter physical balance, not only a war premium. That makes its price floor firmer than a market driven purely by sentiment.

For industrial buyers, the copper-aluminium split is important. Copper procurement risk is increasingly tied to policy, US flows and strategic inventory. Aluminium risk is tied more directly to missing tonnes, energy costs and disrupted regional supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Middle East conflict is exposing the real structure of each base metal market. Copper is becoming a policy-and-premium metal, while aluminium is being supported by a more immediate physical supply shock.

Tight Copper and Aluminium Supply Keeps Metals Outlook Firm Into 2026

ING

Tight copper and aluminium supply is shaping the metals outlook into 2026. ING expects both markets to stay well supported. Copper remains constrained by mine underperformance and disrupted trade flows. Meanwhile, aluminium faces limited supply growth and rising competition for power.

Copper market tightness has extended from 2025 into 2026. ING said operational disruptions and weak mine performance continue to limit supply. Environmental rules, land-use restrictions, and permitting delays add further pressure. As a result, the market still lacks enough new metal outside the United States.

US trade policy is also distorting physical flows. Uncertainty over refined copper tariffs has pulled metal into the US market. ING said this has effectively turned US inventories into a strategic reserve. Therefore, regions outside the US remain tighter than headline stock data suggests.

Copper Market Tightness Still Depends on Supply Constraints and China Demand

Copper market tightness is not being solved by high prices. ING said most spending supports delayed projects or offsets declining ore grades. Very little capital is moving into major greenfield developments. Consequently, current prices cannot fix near-term supply deficits.

Long-term copper demand still looks strong. Grid investment, renewable energy expansion, electrification, and data centre growth support multi-year consumption. However, ING sees China as the main downside risk. Without stronger Chinese buying, copper prices could face sharper corrections.

This imbalance is also driving dealmaking across the mining sector. High prices are encouraging mergers and acquisitions rather than greenfield investment. Producers and investors want near-term output, not distant optionality. Therefore, existing assets now look more strategic than undeveloped projects.

Aluminium Market Deficit Could Deepen as Power Competition Intensifies

Aluminium is also moving toward a tighter structural balance. ING expects a clear aluminium market deficit in 2026. Supply growth outside Indonesia remains limited, while China has kept capacity additions disciplined. As a result, the market may tighten further even without a demand surge.

Energy costs remain the biggest constraint for aluminium supply. High power prices still block meaningful smelter restarts in Europe and the United States. ING also highlighted growing competition from AI-driven data centres. Those facilities can outbid aluminium smelters for long-term electricity contracts.

Demand, however, remains resilient across key end markets. Packaging, transport, construction, and renewable energy continue to support aluminium consumption. Copper substitution in wiring and cables is adding further upside. Therefore, aluminium prices could keep rising if supply stays constrained.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Copper and aluminium now share the same deeper problem. High prices are not producing enough fast supply. That makes policy, power access, and project timing more important than headline demand alone.

Appian Omitiomire Copper Project Deal Adds Near-Term Namibia Supply Option

Appian Capital Advisory

Appian Omitiomire copper project acquisition gives the UK-based mining investment firm a near-term African copper development asset at a time when new mine supply remains difficult to bring forward. Appian Capital Advisory has acquired a 95% equity interest in Namibia’s Omitiomire project, also known as Omico Copper.

Appian Omitiomire copper project development could require more than $400mn of capital. The asset contains around 520,000t of copper in mineable inventory and could produce about 30,000 t/yr over an estimated 15-year mine life.

Appian Omitiomire copper project investment comes as copper prices trade near record levels. Tight concentrate availability, falling grades at mature mines, slow permitting and demand from electrification, grids and data centres continue to support the long-term copper case.

The project is located around 140km northeast of Windhoek. Its mining licence is valid until 2036, with an option to renew.

Omitiomire Adds Mid-Scale Copper Growth in Namibia

Omitiomire has a defined mineral resource of 123mn t grading 0.51% copper. The feasibility study supports a mineable inventory of 102mn t at the same grade.

This gives Appian a defined development platform rather than an early-stage exploration concept. In a market short of fast-moving copper projects, a mid-scale asset with a clear mine life can still provide meaningful incremental supply.

Namibia also offers strategic relevance. The country has growing importance in African mining investment, and Appian already has operating exposure through its Rosh Pinah zinc mine.

That existing footprint matters. Local execution, stakeholder engagement, regulatory knowledge and regional operating relationships can reduce development risk for Omitiomire.

The acquisition also strengthens Appian’s African base metals portfolio. Copper, zinc and other energy-transition metals are becoming increasingly important as investors seek exposure to materials tied to electrification and industrial infrastructure.

Processing Route Will Shape Market Impact

Appian’s technical due diligence identified opportunities to improve project value, including a possible shift from leach-based processing to flotation. That decision will be strategically important.

A leach-based flowsheet would expose the project to sulphuric acid availability and pricing. Acid has become a more sensitive cost and supply variable for copper operations using solvent extraction-electrowinning.

A flotation route would produce copper concentrate for smelting. This would link Omitiomire more directly to the global concentrate market, where treatment charges remain under pressure because mine supply is tight and smelting capacity remains competitive.

Appian has already started discussions with potential partners for future offtake. Future material could be placed with a smelter, trading group or strategic industrial buyer.

That flexibility matters because offtake structure can influence financing, project economics and customer alignment. In today’s copper market, securing a route to market is almost as important as developing the mine itself.

The deal also highlights the growing role of specialist mining funds. Major miners remain focused on tier-one copper projects and brownfield expansions, leaving private capital to advance smaller assets that can still add useful supply.

Appian has relevant experience. It previously developed the Serrote copper-gold project in Brazil through Mineracao Vale Verde before selling the asset last year.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Appian’s Omitiomire deal shows why mid-scale copper projects are becoming more valuable in a constrained supply market. The key decision will be processing strategy, because flotation could turn the asset into a concentrate supplier just as smelters compete harder for feed.

Global Refined Copper Market in Surplus Amid Production Growth

Copper

Copper production outpaces demand in early 2025

The global refined copper market recorded a surplus in January and February 2025, as production exceeded consumption, according to preliminary data from the International Copper Study Group (ICSG). The refined copper surplus reached 150,000 metric tonnes (t) during the period, driven by project ramp-ups and growing output from key producing regions.

Global refined copper output totaled 4.59mn t in the first two months, while consumption stood at 4.44mn t. This marks a slight decline from the 157,000t surplus seen in the same period last year. Still, the figures highlight a persistent oversupply trend in the refined copper market.

Regional trends in refined copper production and consumption

Global copper mine production rose by 1.7pc year-on-year to 3.72mn t. Growth was supported by increased production at Peru’s Las Bambas, Quellaveco, and Toromocho mines, and expansion at the Kamoa mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). However, mine output declined in Asia (-1.5pc), North America (-2.5pc), and Chile (-4pc).

Refined copper output rose 0.9pc to 4.59mn t. Of this, 3.81mn t came from primary sources and 777,000t from secondary scrap production. China and the DRC contributed significantly, with 2pc year-on-year growth, and Asia excluding China saw a 6pc increase due to India's Adani refinery ramp-up. Chile, however, experienced an 18pc fall in refined output.

On the demand side, global refined copper usage grew by 1.1pc to 4.44mn t. Chinese apparent demand rose by 1.6pc, while ex-China demand grew just 0.5pc, with EU, Japanese, and US demand remaining subdued. February alone showed a monthly surplus of 61,000t, with 2.2mn t produced and 2.1mn t consumed.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The copper market surplus in early 2025 reflects uneven regional dynamics, where supply growth outpaces sluggish global demand. While China continues to lead both output and consumption, weakening demand in the US, EU, and Japan suggests potential headwinds. Market participants should closely monitor output cuts or policy-driven demand stimuli to rebalance the market.

Copper Prices Set to Rise Amid US Federal Reserve Rate Cut, but Short-Term Volatility Expected

The recent decision by the US Federal Reserve to cut interest rates is sparking predictions of higher copper prices, particularly from Chinese market participants. This optimism stems from expectations that a weaker US dollar will increase demand for copper, especially in the property sector. Historically, copper and the US dollar have an inverse relationship, as copper is priced in dollars, making it cheaper for buyers using other currencies.

On September 18th, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) reduced the federal funds rate by 50 basis points, bringing it down to a range of 4.75-5%. This move marks the first interest rate cut since 2020, and policymakers have signaled that further reductions are likely before the end of 2024. Another 100 basis points of cuts are anticipated in 2025.

Chinese analysts believe this rate cut could encourage similar actions in China, particularly in the property market, potentially driving copper demand. "China is likely to follow the US to lower its borrowing costs especially on the property market, which may boost copper demand from the property market," an industrial analyst told Metalnomist. This development may further bolster copper prices in the medium term.

Copper prices remained relatively stable following the Fed's announcement, with only minor fluctuations recorded on both the London Metal Exchange (LME) and the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE). Three-month LME copper prices saw a slight drop of 0.2%, settling at $9,382.5 per ton, while SHFE’s most traded October copper contract rose by 0.43% to 74,760 yuan per ton.

Despite these indicators, not everyone shares the same optimism. Some market participants expect copper prices to soften in the short term, as the rate cut had been widely anticipated. “The market has already digested the interest rate cut and copper prices had risen this week,” a trader remarked to Metalnomist. A relatively high SHFE contract price, nearing 75,000 yuan per ton, may also put pressure on downstream producers.

On the supply side, copper inventories in China are declining as downstream producers restock for the Mid-Autumn Festival. The SHFE copper stocks fell from 241,745 tons on August 30th to 185,520 tons by mid-September. This stock drawdown is providing some bullish momentum for copper prices, although some analysts remain cautious about the sustainability of this trend.

Overall, while some analysts are bullish due to falling inventories and expectations of looser monetary policy in both the US and China, others remain skeptical about the near-term outlook for copper prices, citing the market’s earlier response to the expected rate cut.

Aurubis EIB copper expansion loan strengthens Europe’s critical copper supply

Aurubis

The Aurubis EIB copper expansion loan marks a major step in Europe’s critical raw materials strategy. The €200mn investment loan from the European Investment Bank (EIB) will fund capacity growth at Aurubis sites in Bulgaria and Germany. As a result, the Aurubis EIB copper expansion loan directly targets higher refined copper output and more recycled copper flows into EU industry.

The Aurubis EIB copper expansion loan is also the first EIB metals-sector financing under the bank’s new raw materials strategy. In March, the EIB committed to lend around €2bn a year to critical raw materials projects. These include extraction, processing, recycling and substitution technologies across the energy transition value chain. Therefore, the Aurubis EIB copper expansion loan serves as an early flagship for this new mandate.

EIB backs primary and secondary copper growth at Pirdop and Hamburg

Aurubis will use the EIB loan to expand both primary and secondary copper capacity. At Pirdop in Bulgaria, the company is investing €120mn to enlarge its tank-house. This expansion will lift refined copper cathode capacity by 50pc to 340,000 t/yr. Commissioning is planned for fiscal year 2025-26, adding meaningful volumes to Europe’s copper pool.

At the same time, Aurubis will invest €190mn in its Hamburg smelter and refinery complex. The project will enable an extra 30,000 t/yr of recycled copper scrap processing, alongside more internal smelting intermediates. Therefore, the Aurubis EIB copper expansion loan supports both mined copper and circular copper streams. This dual focus directly aligns with EU priorities on recycling, resource efficiency and lower embedded emissions.

These expansions will further cement Aurubis’ position as Europe’s largest copper producer. Increased output from Pirdop and Hamburg should improve regional security of supply. That security is critical as copper demand rises for grid upgrades, renewables, electric vehicles, artificial intelligence and data centre infrastructure.

Copper market vulnerability drives EU support for Aurubis

Recent market dynamics underline why the Aurubis EIB copper expansion loan matters for Europe. Earlier this year, a huge influx of global copper flowed into the US. End-users and traders stockpiled metal ahead of expected US copper import tariffs that never materialised. However, the diversion exposed how quickly European copper availability can tighten when trade flows shift.

Europe’s vulnerability stems from its heavy dependence on imported copper concentrates and refined metal. Any tariff scare, logistics disruption or geopolitical shock can pull units away from the Atlantic basin. Therefore, building more regional smelting, refining and recycling capacity has become a strategic priority. The Aurubis EIB copper expansion loan is a concrete step toward that goal.

By boosting both primary cathode output and recycled copper processing, Aurubis supports a more resilient supply base. Meanwhile, EIB-backed capital lowers financing costs and signals strong policy alignment. Over time, this combination could help stabilise European copper premia and reduce exposure to external shocks.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Aurubis’ deal with the EIB shows how copper is moving to the centre of Europe’s industrial and energy transition policy. The mix of primary capacity growth and scrap-based expansion reflects a realistic view of future copper constraints. Market participants should watch how quickly the new tank-house and Hamburg upgrades translate into additional cathode and scrap-processing volumes, especially if trade tensions divert metal again.