Stellantis Net Loss Shows Cost of Resetting EV Strategy

Stellantis EV

Stellantis net loss reached €22.3bn in 2025 as the global automaker absorbed major charges linked to a strategic reset in electric vehicles. The result highlights how quickly automakers are reassessing electrification plans as customer demand, regulation, pricing, and capital discipline change across the global auto market.

Most of the Stellantis net loss came in the second half of the year, when the company reported a €20.1bn loss. Full-year charges reached €25.4bn, largely tied to what Stellantis described as a profound strategic shift to better match customer demand and regulatory realities.

The company’s brands include Jeep, Peugeot, and Vauxhall. Net revenues fell by 2pc from 2024 to €153.5bn, as foreign exchange pressure and first-half pricing declines outweighed gains from volume and product mix.

EV Supply Chain Resizing Drives Heavy Charges

Stellantis net loss reflects the financial cost of scaling back EV ambitions after earlier expectations proved too aggressive. The company said the charges include product plan changes, EV supply chain resizing, warranty provision adjustments, and previously announced workforce reductions.

The reset shows that automakers are moving from rapid EV expansion toward more flexible technology portfolios. Stellantis now wants to focus on customers’ freedom to choose from a full range of vehicle technologies, rather than relying on a faster linear shift toward battery electric vehicles.

This shift carries major implications for battery materials, power electronics, component suppliers, and EV manufacturing investments. If automakers slow or rebalance EV programs, suppliers exposed to batteries, motors, lightweight materials, and dedicated EV platforms may face weaker demand visibility.

Automakers Rebalance Electrification and Balance Sheet Risk

Stellantis plans to return to profitable growth in 2026 after absorbing the cost of what management called over-estimating the pace of the energy transition. The company will not pay an annual dividend in 2026 and has approved up to €5bn in hybrid bond issuance to protect its balance sheet.

This balance sheet response matters because automakers need capital for multiple technologies at once. Battery EVs, hybrids, combustion platforms, software, emissions compliance, and regional manufacturing all compete for investment. The challenge is no longer simply building EV capacity; it is allocating capital across uncertain demand pathways.

For the wider automotive supply chain, Stellantis’ reset is a warning signal. Electrification remains a long-term direction, but the transition is becoming less uniform, more regional, and more financially disciplined. Suppliers must prepare for a market where hybrid, EV, and combustion demand coexist longer than earlier forecasts suggested.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Stellantis’ 2025 loss shows that the energy transition is entering a harder capital cycle. The winners will not be the companies with the boldest EV targets, but those that manage technology flexibility, supply chain exposure, and balance sheet risk with discipline.

Honda Ontario EV Plan Suspended Amid Slower Market Growth Projections

Honda EV

Honda suspended its ambitious C$15 billion ($10.7 billion) Honda Ontario EV plan to build a comprehensive electric vehicle value chain in Canada. Chief Executive Toshihiro Mibe announced the two-year delay during the company's first-quarter earnings presentation, citing slower-than-expected EV market growth. The Honda Ontario EV plan postponement represents a significant setback for Canada's battery materials supply chain development and critical mineral processing ambitions.

Comprehensive Battery Supply Chain Project Faces Market Reality

The Honda Ontario EV plan encompassed a complete electric vehicle manufacturing ecosystem in Alliston, Ontario, including an EV assembly plant and standalone battery manufacturing facility. Honda partnered with Posco Future M to develop cathode and precursor materials facilities while collaborating with Asahi Kasei on separator plant construction. Meanwhile, this integrated approach aimed to reduce supply chain dependencies while supporting Honda's goal of 100% battery and fuel cell EV sales by 2040.

The comprehensive nature of the Honda Ontario EV plan positioned Canada as a strategic hub for North American electric vehicle production. Honda's investment would have created substantial demand for Canadian critical minerals, particularly lithium, nickel, and cobalt for battery cathode materials. However, slower market adoption rates have forced automakers to reassess their aggressive electrification timelines and associated capital investments.

Critical Mineral Processing Ambitions Face Automotive Headwinds

Canada's strategy to capture value from its abundant critical mineral resources through downstream processing suffers a major blow from the Honda Ontario EV plan suspension. The project represented a key opportunity to establish domestic battery materials manufacturing capabilities using Canadian lithium, nickel, and graphite resources. As a result, the delay undermines government efforts to build integrated critical mineral supply chains within North America.

Posco Future M's planned cathode and precursor facilities would have processed Canadian-sourced critical minerals into high-value battery materials for Honda's EV production. The partnership promised technology transfer and manufacturing expertise to establish Canada's position in global battery supply chains. Therefore, the Honda Ontario EV plan postponement reduces near-term demand prospects for Canadian critical mineral producers seeking domestic processing partnerships.

The two-year delay reflects broader challenges facing automaker electrification strategies as consumer adoption lags initial projections. Honda joins other manufacturers reassessing EV investment timelines amid market uncertainty and profitability concerns. Consequently, critical mineral demand growth may moderate as automakers adjust production capacity plans to match actual market conditions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Honda's decision to pause its massive Ontario investment reflects the gap between aggressive EV transition rhetoric and market reality, highlighting risks for critical mineral producers banking on rapid battery demand growth. This setback underscores the importance of diversified demand strategies for Canadian critical mineral projects, as automotive electrification timelines prove more volatile than anticipated across the industry.

GM Invests $625 Million in US Thacker Pass Lithium Mine to Secure EV Supply Chain

Lithium Americas (LAC)

General Motors (GM) has made a significant investment in the Thacker Pass lithium mine, located in Nevada and owned by Lithium Americas (LAC). The automaker will inject $625 million into the project, acquiring a 38% stake, marking the largest investment in a lithium mining project by a US carmaker to date. This deal comes as part of a broader effort to strengthen the supply chain for electric vehicle (EV) materials, following a $2.3 billion loan commitment from the US Department of Energy to support Thacker Pass earlier this year.

Jeff Morrison, GM's senior vice-president of global purchasing and supply chain, emphasized the importance of this partnership: "We're pleased with the significant progress Lithium Americas is making to help GM achieve our goal to develop a resilient EV material supply chain. Sourcing critical EV raw materials, like lithium, from suppliers in the US is expected to help us manage battery cell costs, deliver value to our customers and investors, and create jobs."

The first phase of development at Thacker Pass will be backed by an initial cash infusion of $330 million from GM. This phase aims to produce 40,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate annually, all of which GM will secure through an offtake agreement. This supply is projected to be sufficient for approximately 800,000 electric vehicles, highlighting the scale and significance of this partnership in meeting future EV demand.

Recent lithium carbonate prices have shown some volatility, with rates declining to $9.30-9.60/kg CIF China from $9.50-9.80/kg as recorded on October 8.

The collaboration between GM and LAC underscores the growing importance of domestic lithium production for the US EV industry and the need for a stable supply chain for critical raw materials. As electric vehicles gain popularity, such strategic partnerships are crucial in ensuring sustainable growth and meeting market demand.

Suzuki e-Vitara Electric SUV Launch Signals a Bigger EV Push in India

Suzuki eVX

Suzuki e-Vitara electric SUV marks the company’s formal shift into full battery electric vehicles. Suzuki began sales of the e-Vitara in India, making it the firm’s first BEV model. This launch matters because Suzuki has long relied more heavily on hybrids. As a result, Suzuki e-Vitara electric SUV becomes a strategic test of how seriously the company will pursue the EV market.

The launch also puts India at the center of Suzuki’s electric transition. The model is built at Maruti Suzuki’s Hansalpur plant in Gujarat. That site already sits inside a broader expansion plan targeting 1mn EVs per year. Therefore, Suzuki e-Vitara electric SUV is not just a product launch. It is part of a much larger manufacturing ambition.

India EV Supply Chain Still Looks Tight

India EV supply chain remains the biggest constraint behind Suzuki’s electric growth path. The company did not disclose battery chemistry or sourcing details for the e-Vitara. That leaves open a critical question about how Suzuki will secure enough cells as production rises. Consequently, the commercial success of the Suzuki e-Vitara electric SUV will depend on more than vehicle demand alone.

The wider Indian market is still dealing with upstream bottlenecks. Carmakers warned last year that China’s rare earth export controls could slow motor production because of magnet shortages. Domestic projects in lithium, nickel, cobalt, and rare earths have also moved slowly. Therefore, India EV supply chain development still lags the scale of EV ambition.

Maruti Suzuki EV Strategy Extends Beyond the Vehicle Itself

Maruti Suzuki EV strategy is not limited to selling one electric SUV. The company also announced a goal of 100,000 branded charging points by 2030. It has already installed 2,000 of them. That means Suzuki is trying to shape the charging ecosystem alongside vehicle rollout. As a result, the Suzuki e-Vitara electric SUV launch is tied to infrastructure as well as manufacturing.

This wider strategy makes sense in a market where ecosystem gaps still matter. Other Indian EV and battery plans have already been scaled back or delayed. That creates space for more disciplined players to build practical scale over time. Meanwhile, Maruti Suzuki EV strategy may benefit from moving more steadily than some earlier industry promises.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Suzuki’s first electric SUV matters because it shows India’s EV shift is moving from announcements to actual product launches. The bigger challenge now is not whether Suzuki can build an electric model. It is whether India can build the battery materials, cells, magnets, and charging network needed to support that growth at scale.

GM Redwood Battery Storage Project Extends EV Battery Value Chain

BESS

GM Redwood battery storage project will deploy repurposed electric vehicle battery packs at a General Motors plant in Michigan, extending the useful life of batteries before final recycling.

GM Redwood battery storage project will combine 100 reused EV battery packs into a 1.5MW/7.2MWh battery energy storage system. The installation will provide dispatchable power and help reduce electricity costs at the manufacturing site.

GM Redwood battery storage project is significant because it connects battery manufacturing, vehicle use, second-life energy storage and materials recovery within one supply chain. Redwood estimates the system will save more than $3mn in electricity costs over its operating life.

The project also shows how retired EV batteries can remain economically valuable even after they no longer meet automotive performance requirements.

Second-Life Batteries Add Value Before Recycling

EV batteries typically retain significant usable capacity when they are removed from vehicles. That remaining energy storage capability can support stationary applications where weight and space are less restrictive than in automotive use.

Repurposing packs for BESS applications can therefore delay recycling while extracting additional economic value from the battery.

For industrial facilities, storage systems can help manage peak electricity demand, provide backup power and shift energy consumption toward lower-cost periods.

The Michigan installation gives GM a direct opportunity to reduce plant electricity costs using batteries already linked to its own vehicle ecosystem.

This model also reduces the need for newly manufactured cells in some stationary storage applications. That can lower incremental demand for lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and other battery materials.

However, second-life systems still require testing, battery management and safety controls because used packs can have different degradation histories and performance characteristics.

Redwood Builds Closed-Loop Battery Supply Chain With GM

Redwood's relationship with GM extends across multiple stages of the battery lifecycle. The recycler handles manufacturing scrap, end-of-life EV packs and now second-life energy storage deployment.

Redwood has already received more than 28,000t of material from GM, with another 10,000 EV battery packs expected to enter the pipeline.

The company also works with Ultium Cells, GM's joint venture with LG Energy Solution, to recycle battery production scrap from facilities in Ohio and Tennessee.

This creates a more integrated materials loop. Manufacturing scrap can return quickly to recycling, while vehicle batteries can first enter stationary storage before eventually being processed for material recovery.

The approach could become increasingly important as EV battery volumes grow. Recycling alone captures raw materials, but second-life deployment can add another revenue stage before final recovery.

For automakers, that can improve battery economics while strengthening access to recycled lithium, nickel, cobalt and copper over the longer term.

The Metalnomist Commentary

GM and Redwood are showing that the battery circular economy does not begin with recycling. Second-life storage can create an additional commercial stage between vehicle use and materials recovery, improving both battery economics and supply-chain efficiency.

EU EV Transition Faces Energy Cost and Trade Policy Pressure

EU energy

EU EV transition plans are facing growing pressure from high energy costs, tougher global competition and a regulatory model that industry leaders say may be weakening Europe’s automotive position. Speakers at the FT Future of the Car Summit warned that Europe must rethink how it competes with China and other industrial economies.

EU EV transition policy has relied heavily on regulation, including the planned 2035 phase-out of new internal combustion engine car sales. But carmakers and suppliers argue that regulation alone cannot deliver a competitive electric vehicle industry if energy prices, subsidies and supply-chain costs remain unfavourable.

EU EV transition challenges are becoming more visible as Chinese automakers gain share in Europe, southeast Asia and Latin America. Chinese producers have built cost-competitive EV platforms through subsidies, domestic competition, supply-chain control and fast industrial scaling.

The debate matters for metals because slower or more expensive electrification can reshape demand for lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, copper, aluminium and rare earth magnets. Automotive materials demand will still grow, but the path may become less direct and more exposed to policy choices.

China’s EV Scale Forces Europe to Rethink Trade Strategy

European automotive suppliers are calling for a more realistic approach to global competition. The industry is facing rivals that operate under different labour, subsidy and industrial policy conditions.

China has become one of the world’s strongest EV exporters. It accounted for around 40% of global EV exports in 2024, while leading Chinese brands have expanded aggressively with lower-cost, technology-rich vehicles.

This creates a competitive problem for European carmakers. Europe has focused on setting strict emissions targets, while China has focused on making EVs cheaper, scalable and export-ready.

Several industry executives now argue that collaboration may become unavoidable. Western manufacturers may need to partner with Chinese or other international competitors that already have a technological lead in EV platforms, batteries, software and power electronics.

This could change European supply chains. Rather than developing every technology internally, carmakers may increasingly combine European assembly and branding with externally sourced EV systems.

That strategy could support faster electrification, but it also creates dependence on imported components, battery materials and processed inputs. It may help automakers compete on cost, but it does not solve Europe’s strategic materials vulnerability.

Energy Costs Could Slow Consumer Adoption and Metals Demand

High charging and energy costs are another major barrier to Europe’s EV push. If consumers face much higher charging costs than drivers in China or other regions, the economic case for EV adoption weakens.

This is critical because EV demand is highly sensitive to total ownership cost. Batteries may become cheaper, but charging costs, highway tariffs and energy price volatility can still shape consumer decisions.

For battery metals, this matters directly. Slower EV adoption would reduce the speed of demand growth for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese, especially in full battery electric vehicles with large battery packs.

Copper and aluminium remain better positioned across multiple automotive pathways. EVs require copper for wiring, motors, charging systems and power electronics, while aluminium supports lightweighting, battery enclosures and structural components.

However, Europe’s automotive metals demand will increasingly depend on which technology mix wins. Full BEVs support larger battery metals demand, while hybrids and lower-cost EV platforms could shift consumption toward smaller batteries, more electronics and continued use of conventional automotive materials.

The policy challenge is therefore industrial as much as environmental. Europe must reduce emissions while keeping manufacturing competitive, securing raw materials and lowering energy costs for consumers.

If Europe cannot align regulation, energy prices and trade strategy, its EV transition could become a market for imported vehicles rather than a platform for domestic industrial growth.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s EV problem is not only about regulation or consumer demand. It is about whether the region can build a cost-competitive industrial system around energy, materials, technology and trade before Chinese EV platforms define the market.

Cornex-Shanshan Battery Anode Deal Signals Aggressive EV Supply Chain Securing

Cornex

The Cornex-Shanshan battery anode deal locks in critical anode supply for fast growth. The agreement is worth over 10bn yuan ($1.39bn). The firms did not disclose volumes or tenor. The Cornex-Shanshan battery anode deal follows Cornex’s rapid feedstock contracting. Therefore, it strengthens cell output visibility in a volatile market. The Cornex-Shanshan battery anode deal also consolidates Yunnan-to-coastal anode logistics advantages.

Strategic supply and capacity signals

Shanshan increased anode output to 354,605t in 2024, up 27% year over year. Sales reached 339,536t, up 28% from 2023. Therefore, Shanshan can support large, multi-year awards. Cornex also secured cathode and foil inputs this year. It booked 150,000t LFP from Jiangsu Lopal in May. It added 152,000t LFP from Eve Energy in June. In July, it locked 160,000t copper foil from Nuode over five years. Consequently, Cornex de-risks key battery bill-of-materials.

Implications for feedstock, pricing, and EV supply chains

This contract tightens premium graphite and silicon-blend availability. However, scale should improve Cornex’s unit costs and yields. Downstream EV and storage demand continues to expand. Metalnomist sees EV sales reaching 60mn by 2035. The CAGR from 2025 is 12%, supporting anode expansion. Therefore, stable offtakes will matter for financing and capacity ramps. Banks and OEMs will seek transparency on pricing formulas.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This tie-up prioritizes supply certainty over perfect price timing. Expect further vertical coordination across cathode, anode, and foil. Watch qualification timelines and cost pass-through mechanisms into 2026 contracts.

Volkswagen ID.4 Production Halt Shows US EV Demand Pressure

Volkswagen EV

Volkswagen ID.4 production in the US will end as the German automaker shifts its Chattanooga, Tennessee, plant toward higher-volume internal combustion vehicle output. The decision reflects weaker electric vehicle demand in the US and the need to protect North American manufacturing utilisation.

Volkswagen said the EV market continues to challenge the industry and requires measured decisions. The company will stop producing the ID.4 at Chattanooga and begin assembling the all-new second-generation Atlas from mid-April 2026.

Volkswagen ID.4 production has been strategically important because the model is the company’s top-selling EV in the US. However, the ID.4 sold 22,373 units in 2025, far below the Atlas, which sold 71,044 units and remained Volkswagen’s second-best-selling model for the past three years.

The decision shows how automakers are adjusting production footprints as EV adoption slows. US EV sales fell by 27% year on year to 216,300 units in the first quarter, creating pressure on manufacturers to rebalance plant capacity, dealer inventory and product planning.

Chattanooga Shift Prioritises Higher-Volume SUV Demand

The Chattanooga plant will now focus on the second-generation Atlas, a three-row sport utility vehicle with much stronger US sales momentum. This gives Volkswagen a clearer volume base in a market where larger SUVs remain commercially attractive.

The move is not a full retreat from the ID.4. Volkswagen said model-year 2026 ID.4 vehicles will remain available through current inventory, supporting US demand into 2027. The company also plans a future version of the ID.4 for North America, although details have not yet been disclosed.

Still, the production shift is significant. Automakers rarely remove capacity from a model unless demand, margin or manufacturing strategy has changed. In this case, Volkswagen appears to be choosing a higher-volume SUV platform over a slower-moving EV in the near term.

This reflects a wider industry trend. EV demand has become more uneven as consumers respond to vehicle prices, charging access, policy uncertainty and changing incentive structures. Automakers now need more flexible production strategies rather than relying on straight-line EV growth forecasts.

EV Slowdown Could Weigh on Battery Materials Demand

Volkswagen ID.4 production changes also matter for the battery materials supply chain. Lower EV output can reduce near-term demand for lithium, nickel, graphite, manganese, copper, aluminium and rare earth magnet materials linked to electric drivetrains and battery systems.

The effect will not come from Volkswagen alone. The bigger issue is that several automakers are reassessing EV production rates in response to slower consumer adoption. If this pattern continues, battery material demand growth may become more volatile than earlier industry forecasts suggested.

For suppliers, the shift creates a timing problem. Many battery, cathode, anode and recycling investments were planned around rapid EV market expansion. Slower model-level output can leave material producers exposed to weaker offtake, lower utilisation and price pressure.

At the same time, Volkswagen’s decision does not eliminate long-term EV demand. It shows that the transition may move in phases, with automakers balancing EVs, hybrids and combustion vehicles depending on regional demand. North America may therefore remain a more mixed powertrain market than China or parts of Europe.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Volkswagen’s ID.4 decision shows that EV strategy is now being tested by real factory economics. The energy transition is still moving forward, but automakers will increasingly prioritise models that protect utilisation, margins and supply-chain stability.

Stellantis Leapmotor Spain BEV Production Plan Signals Localised Chinese EV Strategy

Stellantis

Stellantis Leapmotor Spain BEV production plans could mark a new phase in Europe’s electric vehicle supply chain, as western automakers look to combine local assembly with lower-cost Chinese components. Stellantis and Leapmotor are considering new battery electric vehicle lines at Zaragoza and Villaverde in Spain through their Leapmotor International joint venture.

Stellantis Leapmotor Spain BEV production would move the partnership beyond vehicle imports and toward European manufacturing. That shift matters because local content rules, tariff risk and regional supply security are becoming more important in the EV market.

Stellantis Leapmotor Spain BEV production could also help the companies respond to weaker European affordability conditions. Chinese component sourcing can lower cost, while Spanish assembly may improve regulatory and commercial positioning inside Europe.

The companies have not disclosed production targets, utilisation rates or investment figures. This leaves the scale of the plan uncertain, but the strategic direction is clear.

Spain Could Become a European Platform for Leapmotor Models

Zaragoza could gain a new all-electric SUV line as early as this year. The plant has long been associated with Opel production and could become a base for new BEV output under the joint venture.

Villaverde in Madrid may also become more important to Leapmotor International. The plant faces a production gap after Citroen C4 output ends and may shift entirely to Leapmotor models by 2029.

That potential transition would give Stellantis a way to protect industrial activity at existing Spanish plants while adding lower-cost BEV models to its European portfolio.

The plan reflects a broader industry pattern. European automakers are trying to defend market share against Chinese EV competition while also using Chinese platforms, components and cost structures to improve competitiveness.

Stellantis bought a 21% stake in Leapmotor in 2023 and created a 51-49 joint venture to sell and manufacture Leapmotor vehicles outside China. Spain could now become one of the key production bases for that strategy.

For Spain, the opportunity is industrial. More BEV assembly could support jobs, supplier activity and demand for local logistics, batteries, wiring, aluminium components and electronics integration.

Local Assembly Meets Cost Pressure and Supply-Chain Rules

The move from imports to local production is strategically important. European BEV manufacturing is increasingly shaped by tariffs, local content rules, battery sourcing requirements and political pressure to keep vehicle production inside the region.

Leapmotor brings cost-competitive EV engineering and components. Stellantis brings European plants, distribution, regulatory experience and manufacturing scale.

This combination could help address one of Europe’s biggest EV problems: producing affordable electric vehicles while maintaining regional industrial capacity.

However, the lack of disclosed volumes makes the market impact difficult to judge. Without production targets, it is unclear whether the Spain plans will materially change Stellantis’ European BEV output.

Stellantis needs stronger BEV momentum. Its BEV sales accounted for around 13% of output in the first half of last year, behind Volkswagen and BMW, and the company later reported a major write-down after cutting prices.

Leapmotor is growing much faster. Its EV sales, including plug-in hybrids, more than doubled last year to 596,000 units. That growth gives Stellantis access to a Chinese partner with clear scale momentum.

The industrial implication extends into materials. More European BEV production increases demand for aluminium body and structural parts, copper wiring, electrical steel, battery materials, power electronics and lightweight components.

If the model works, Stellantis and Leapmotor could create a template for Chinese-designed, Europe-built EVs. That would reshape competition not only in vehicles, but also in the upstream materials and component chains that support regional BEV manufacturing.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Stellantis and Leapmotor are not only discussing new Spanish EV lines; they are testing a hybrid supply-chain model for Europe. Local assembly with Chinese components may become a practical route for automakers caught between cost pressure, tariff risk and the need to keep European factories active.

Toyota Secures $4.5 Million DOE Funding for EV Battery Recycling Technology

Argonne National Laboratory

Toyota, a global leader in automotive innovation, has received $4.5 million from the US Department of Energy (DOE) to advance cutting-edge electric vehicle (EV) battery recycling technology. This initiative aims to address critical bottlenecks in battery recycling, including automating pack disassembly, improving battery identification and sorting with data-driven methods, and mitigating challenges posed by cell degradation.

The Toyota Research Institute of North America will spearhead this project by developing autonomous robotic systems to disassemble EV batteries, an essential step toward enhancing sustainability and efficiency in the battery supply chain.

Efforts to Build a Sustainable Battery Ecosystem

As the demand for EVs grows, so does the volume of spent batteries and manufacturing scrap. Toyota’s initiative represents an effort to make the recycling process more sustainable, efficient, and scalable.

This latest project builds on Toyota’s growing portfolio of collaborations and research in battery recycling:

• April 2024: Partnered with Argonne National Laboratory to explore direct recycling processes for cathode chemistries containing critical minerals like nickel, manganese, and cobalt.

• Late 2023: Partnered with Cirba Solutions to enhance the collection, storage, testing, and recycling of spent batteries.

• 2022: Collaborated with Redwood Materials to focus on recycling hybrid EV batteries through improved collection and testing methods.

By working with leading recycling companies and research organizations, Toyota aims to ensure that its batteries are part of a closed-loop supply chain, reducing reliance on virgin materials and enhancing the sustainability of its EV production process.

The Path Ahead for EV Sustainability

This DOE-funded project underscores the increasing importance of a sustainable battery supply chain as EV adoption rises globally. By tackling technical challenges such as cell degradation and automation, Toyota is paving the way for scalable recycling solutions critical to the EV industry’s future.

Comexport to assemble GM Chinese EVs in Brazil

Comexport

Comexport to assemble GM Chinese EVs marks a major shift in Brazil’s role within global EV supply chains. The Brazilian foreign trade firm will assemble GM’s new Spark EUV, a Chinese electric vehicle sold under the Chevrolet brand, at the former Ford-owned PACE industrial hub. As a result, the Comexport to assemble GM Chinese EVs deal turns a decommissioned plant into a regional platform for imported Chinese SKD units.

The project uses a flexible contract-assembly model rather than an equity partnership or joint venture. Comexport will import semi-knocked-down Spark units from China, already welded, painted and partially manufactured, and then complete final assembly at PACE. Meanwhile, GM will supervise production quality and pay Comexport per unit, ensuring OEM control over standards while limiting capital exposure. Therefore, the Comexport to assemble GM Chinese EVs contract gives GM fast market access with lower fixed costs.

PACE becomes Brazil’s first multi-brand EV assembly hub

PACE will emerge as Brazil’s first and only multi-brand vehicle assembly line once all client negotiations close. The plant, acquired by Comexport in 2024 from the state of Ceara, will serve at least three carmakers, with GM confirmed as the first anchor client. Initially, the facility will operate below its 80,000 vehicle per year capacity and gradually ramp up as the local supply chain matures.

GM plans for all Spark units sold in Brazil to be assembled as SKD imports over time. However, the company will first bring in fully built consumer-ready vehicles while Comexport stabilises processes and tooling. As the supply chain “nationalises”, more Brazilian auto-parts suppliers will enter the platform, supporting localisation targets and potentially unlocking tax and industrial policy incentives. This phased approach reduces ramp-up risk while anchoring long term EV manufacturing in northeastern Brazil.

Chinese EV platforms deepen their footprint in Latin America

The project highlights how Chinese EV platforms penetrate Latin America via global OEM brands and contract assemblers. The Spark is a Chinese-developed model from the joint venture between GM, SAIC and Wuling, sold domestically as the Baojun Yep Plus. Therefore, Brazilian consumers will buy a Chevrolet-badged vehicle that originates from a Chinese EV architecture. PACE will exclusively assemble hybrids and EVs, increasing the likelihood that future clients will also be Chinese or China-linked automakers.

For GM, this structure supports a broader strategy of leveraging Chinese small-EV know-how while maintaining brand control in key emerging markets. For Brazil, the Comexport to assemble GM Chinese EVs model could accelerate EV adoption, technology transfer and supplier upgrading, especially in battery, electronics and lightweight components. However, policymakers and local OEMs will also scrutinise the impact on domestic manufacturers and industrial competitiveness as Chinese-origin platforms gain share.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This deal illustrates how decommissioned legacy plants can be repurposed into EV assembly hubs bound into China-centric technology networks. By combining SKD imports, contract assembly and gradual localisation, Comexport and GM create a flexible template that other brands may copy across Latin America. Market participants should watch how quickly local suppliers move into higher value EV components and how Brazil balances openness to Chinese platforms with support for domestic champions.

Automotive Raw Material Supply Chains Hit Localisation Limits

Automotive

Automotive raw material supply chains are becoming the main constraint on electric vehicle localisation as carmakers seek more control over strategic components. Automakers want regional supply chains, but battery metals, rare earths and processed inputs still depend on global mining and refining networks.

Automotive raw material supply chains have shifted from pure efficiency toward resilience, security and geopolitical risk management. The industry is no longer trying only to minimise cost. It is trying to protect production from export controls, licensing delays, trade restrictions and raw material shortages.

Automotive raw material supply chains therefore cannot be fully localised by assembling batteries, motors or electronics closer to vehicle plants. The deeper constraint sits upstream, where lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese and rare earth materials remain tied to global extraction and processing capacity.

The result is a more selective supply-chain model. Automakers will regionalise the components they can control, while still relying on global raw materials for the minerals and refined products they cannot replace quickly.

EV Localisation Still Depends on Global Critical Minerals

Jaguar Land Rover has decided to control three critical parts of electric propulsion: battery assembly, electric drive units and energy management systems. This gives the company more control over the final systems that define EV performance.

However, vertical integration has limits. Even if an automaker controls battery assembly or electric drive units, it may not control the lithium chemicals, nickel sulphate, cobalt, manganese, graphite or rare earth magnets inside those systems.

Permanent magnet motors remain one of the clearest pressure points. Electric drive units depend on rare earth materials that are still heavily exposed to Chinese processing, magnet production and export licensing.

Obtaining magnet raw materials from China has become more difficult from a licensing perspective. This shows how export controls can affect vehicle production even when the final assembly line is located in Europe or the US.

Battery supply chains face the same structural problem. Automakers can localise pack assembly, module production and software integration, but raw material exposure remains global.

Lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese supply depends on mine locations, refining capacity, chemical conversion and government policy. These inputs cannot be made local simply by building a battery plant near an auto factory.

This changes the meaning of automotive localisation. The next phase will be less about full independence and more about reducing exposure to single-country bottlenecks.

Recycling and Traceability Become Strategic Tools

Critical minerals recycling is becoming a strategic issue for automakers, not only an environmental goal. Black mass recovery can eventually return lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper and other materials into the supply chain.

Recycling can reduce raw material exposure over time. But it depends on enough end-of-life batteries, reliable collection systems, safe transport, processing capacity and customer acceptance of recovered materials.

The UK’s critical minerals strategy reflects this reality. Domestic production, partner-country supply agreements and recycling can improve resilience, but full self-sufficiency is not realistic.

That point matters for manufacturers. Supply security will depend on diversified sourcing, trusted partners, recycling loops and traceable material flows rather than a complete break from global markets.

The shift will also affect pricing. Materials may increasingly carry value based on origin, regulatory acceptability, sustainability documentation and licensing risk.

A battery metal or rare earth input from a secure and traceable source may command a premium over lower-cost material with higher geopolitical or compliance risk.

For automakers, the strategic challenge is clear. They must control more of the EV system while accepting that critical mineral supply will remain globally contested.

For metals suppliers, the opportunity is also clear. Producers that can offer traceable, compliant and secure supply will become more valuable to automotive customers than suppliers competing only on price.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Automakers are learning that EV localisation stops where raw material dependence begins. The winners in automotive supply security will be those that connect local manufacturing with diversified minerals, recycling capacity and credible traceability.

Aludyne Linamar auto parts deal reshapes North American chassis supply

Aludyne

The Aludyne Linamar auto parts deal marks a significant reshaping of North America’s chassis and structures supply chain. Aludyne will sell most of its North American precision casting, machining and manufacturing plants to Linamar for $300mn, with closing expected within 30 days. The transaction transfers a broad footprint of Tier 1 assets at a time when the regional automotive sector faces EV uncertainty and capacity rebalancing. As a result, the Aludyne Linamar auto parts deal strengthens Linamar’s position with OEMs while allowing Aludyne to exit capital-intensive operations.

Linamar deepens chassis portfolio with Aludyne plants

The Aludyne Linamar auto parts deal will fold Aludyne’s US and Mexican plants into Linamar’s structures and chassis division. Linamar gains established North American production of knuckles, subframes, control arms and axle housings, all core safety-critical components. This expansion enhances Linamar’s ability to offer integrated chassis solutions, which helps automakers rationalise suppliers and reduce logistics complexity.

Meanwhile, the Aludyne assets complement Linamar’s recent move into Europe through the purchase of George Fischer’s iron foundry in Leipzig. Together, these acquisitions expand Linamar’s geographic and product reach across cast and machined suspension and structural parts. Therefore, the company positions itself as a global Tier 1 partner able to support multi-platform programmes across internal combustion, hybrid and battery electric vehicles.

EV headwinds force rethink of giga-casting strategy

At the same time, Linamar is trying to divest its aluminium die giga-casting plant in Welland, Ontario, completed in 2024. That facility was originally designed to make large structural castings for EV platforms, targeting long-term supply to major OEMs. However, the end of US EV tax credits under President Donald Trump has weakened demand visibility for high-volume EV structures. This shift explains why the Aludyne Linamar auto parts deal now looks more attractive than betting solely on giga-casting growth.

As a result, Linamar appears to be pivoting back toward a diversified mix of cast and machined chassis parts, with less exposure to a single EV-heavy technology bet. The acquisition balances risk by anchoring the group in essential underbody and suspension components that remain necessary across all powertrains. For automakers, a stronger Linamar could offer greater resilience in North American sourcing, even as EV policy volatility complicates long-term platform planning.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Aludyne Linamar auto parts deal underlines how policy-driven EV headwinds are reshaping capital allocation in the auto supply chain. Tier 1 suppliers are moving away from single-technology bets toward diversified portfolios of foundational components and regional footprints. For metals suppliers and casting houses, the key will be aligning product mix with flexible, multi-powertrain platforms rather than relying on overly optimistic EV adoption curves.

US EV tax credit expiration reshapes electric vehicle market

US EV

US EV tax credit expiration after 15 years is reshaping vehicle affordability and demand across the US auto market. The US EV tax credit supported sales of models like the Tesla Model Y and Chevrolet Equinox EV. Now the US EV tax credit has ended, leaving buyers with higher upfront costs and manufacturers with greater policy uncertainty.

US EV tax credit expiration driven by politics and fiscal push

The US EV tax credit began in 2008 as a bipartisan tool to jump-start early EV adoption. It later expanded under the Inflation Reduction Act, which tied eligibility to US-made vehicles and domestic supply chains. However, Republican lawmakers and oil interests increasingly opposed the subsidy, arguing it distorted markets and threatened future gasoline demand.

As a result, the latest tax and energy law under president Donald Trump removed the incentive from 30 September. Lawmakers framed the US EV tax credit expiration as a way to save more than $190bn over ten years. The move reflects a broader rollback of climate-linked support measures, including plans to repeal greenhouse gas limits on cars and trucks. This policy reversal now clashes with long-term investment cycles for automakers and battery producers.

EV affordability and US supply chains face fresh headwinds

The end of the US EV tax credit comes while EVs still cost more than conventional cars. Recent data show US EVs carry an average price premium of around $8,000 over combustion models. Without the $7,500 federal incentive, many mass-market buyers lose a key financial lever that helped close the price gap. This will likely slow new orders, particularly in middle-income segments and fleet purchases.

Meanwhile, manufacturers warn that the loss of the credit weakens the business case for US-based EV and battery plants. The revised credit had pushed automakers to localise assembly and critical mineral sourcing inside the US or allied countries. Its removal undercuts one of the strongest pull factors for building gigafactories, cathode plants and related supply chain assets on US soil. Industry groups argue this shift could hand competitive advantage back to regions with more stable policy support.

State-level climate policy will now carry more weight in the US EV landscape. California and other Democratic-led states plan to maintain strict tailpipe standards and invest heavily in charging infrastructure. However, even ambitious state measures cannot fully compensate for the vanished federal incentive. Automakers must therefore navigate a patchwork of regional rules while recalibrating sales forecasts and capital plans in a post-credit market.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The US EV tax credit expiration exposes the tension between long-term industrial strategy and short-term political swings. For metals and battery supply chains, the key risk is stop-start demand that complicates investment in lithium, nickel and cathode capacity. Unless policy clarity returns, the US could cede ground to regions where EV incentives and climate regulations move in a steadier direction.

Hedge Funds Metals Exposure Rises as Supply Chain Fragmentation Reshapes Markets

Metals

Hedge funds metals exposure is increasing as geopolitical risk, supply chain fragmentation and commodity-intensive investment cycles draw more financial capital into industrial and precious metals. Panellists at the FT Commodities Global Summit in Lausanne said metals are becoming more attractive to portfolio managers seeking exposure beyond equities, bonds and credit.

The shift reflects a deeper change in global markets. Economic growth is increasingly tied to physical capital expenditure, including power grids, transport systems, storage infrastructure, clean energy assets and industrial manufacturing capacity.

Hedge funds metals exposure is therefore being driven by more than short-term price volatility. Investors are responding to long-term underinvestment in physical infrastructure, tighter supply chains and the growing strategic role of metals in energy transition, defence and industrial policy.

Metals Gain Financial Appeal as Physical Investment Cycles Expand

Commodity markets are attracting more capital because the global economy is becoming more materials-intensive. The energy transition requires copper, aluminium, nickel, lithium, rare earths, silver, steel and specialty metals for grids, batteries, renewables, electric vehicles and data centres.

Supply tightness is also changing investor behaviour. Years of underinvestment in mines, smelters, refineries, logistics and storage have made several metal markets more vulnerable to disruption.

Geopolitical risk adds another layer. Export controls, tariffs, sanctions, stockpiling and regional supply-chain policies are making metals less predictable and more strategic.

This volatility creates opportunities for hedge funds. Metals now offer exposure to electrification, critical minerals, defence demand, AI infrastructure and supply security themes.

The rise in hedge funds metals exposure also shows that commodities are no longer only inflation hedges or cyclical trades. They are becoming a way to invest in physical bottlenecks created by a more fragmented global economy.

Traders Keep Physical Edge While Hedge Funds Scale Data Strategies

Commodity traders still hold a major advantage in physical arbitrage. They understand vessel movements, warehouse flows, regional premiums, logistics constraints and on-the-ground supply conditions.

That physical insight is difficult for financial investors to replicate. Knowing the price difference between one location and another often favours traders with direct market access and operational knowledge.

Hedge funds have different strengths. They are better positioned to analyse large macro themes, such as China’s stationary battery deployment, grid investment, EV adoption and industrial demand shifts.

Artificial intelligence is becoming another differentiator. Some hedge funds are embedding machine learning more deeply into trading, forecasting and risk management.

Commodity traders and energy companies are investing in data and automation, but many still lag hedge funds in systematic technology-driven trading. This gap could narrow as physical traders combine market intelligence with stronger analytics.

The result is a more competitive metals market. Physical traders will keep their logistical edge, while hedge funds may increasingly shape price discovery through capital flows, macro positioning and AI-supported strategies.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Hedge funds metals exposure is rising because metals now sit at the intersection of infrastructure, geopolitics and technology. The next market advantage will belong to firms that can combine physical supply-chain knowledge with faster data, AI and capital allocation.

Indonesia-China EV battery joint venture to start output by 2026

PT AnekaTambang

Indonesia-China EV battery joint venture is set to start operations in 2026, marking a milestone in Southeast Asia’s battery industry. PT Aneka Tambang (Antam) and CATL are leading the $5.9bn project, which will significantly expand Indonesia’s role in global EV supply chains. The Indonesia-China EV battery joint venture aims for 15GWh capacity by 2028, supporting up to 300,000 EVs annually.

A $5.9bn integrated ecosystem for battery materials

The joint venture begins with a 6.9GWh capacity, expanding to 15GWh by 2028. Additionally, officials highlighted potential integration with solar panel battery storage, raising capacity to 40GWh. Most of the investment—around $4.7bn—will fund nickel smelters, mining, and precursor plants in North Maluku. Meanwhile, the battery cell project in West Java accounts for $1.2bn of the total budget.

Indonesia’s mineral advantage meets China’s battery expertise

Indonesia holds abundant nickel, cobalt, and manganese, essential for EV batteries, but lacks lithium and advanced technology. Therefore, Antam partnered with CATL to secure the expertise and technology required. By 2026, smelting and hydrometallurgy plants, alongside a nickel-cobalt-manganese precursor facility, are expected to strengthen Indonesia’s midstream value chain. This partnership underscores a growing alignment between Indonesia’s resource base and China’s global battery leadership.

Energy independence and EV market expansion

The Indonesia-China EV battery joint venture could supply batteries for 300,000 EVs annually, potentially reducing fuel imports by 300,000 kilolitres per year. President Prabowo stated that Indonesia could reach full energy self-sufficiency within five to seven years, provided battery production grows to 100GWh annually. As a result, Indonesia is positioning itself not just as a raw material supplier but as an integrated EV hub.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Indonesia’s partnership with CATL cements its role in the global EV battery supply chain. However, success depends on infrastructure, environmental safeguards, and balancing resource nationalism with foreign investment. If executed effectively, Indonesia could become a strategic alternative to China-dominated supply routes.

Latam EV Market Set for Massive 2025 Expansion Driven by Chinese Automakers

Latam EV Market

The Latam EV market will experience unprecedented growth in 2025 as electric vehicle sales in Latin America and emerging markets double to 1 million units. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), Chinese automakers drive this expansion by offering significantly cheaper models than traditional Western brands. The Latam EV market surge represents a critical shift in global automotive demand that will substantially increase battery materials consumption across the region.

Chinese Battery Technology Advantages Fuel Market Penetration

Chinese automakers captured 75% of all EV sales in emerging economies by leveraging superior cost advantages in battery pack manufacturing. China produces cheaper battery packs due to intense competition, enhanced manufacturing efficiency, supply chain integration, and access to skilled workforces. Meanwhile, Chinese battery pack prices fell 30% compared to only 10-15% decreases in Europe and the United States.

BYD and GWM electric vehicles now compete directly with conventional petrol cars in key Latam EV market segments. In Brazil, BYD's largest market outside China, the price gap between battery electric cars and conventional vehicles narrowed to just 25%. Therefore, Chinese manufacturers achieve price parity with internal combustion engines in Thailand and approach competitive pricing across Latin America.

Regional Manufacturing Expansion Promises Further Cost Reductions

Local production capacity remains minimal, with only 5% of EVs sold in emerging markets produced regionally currently. GWM and BYD plan to establish factories in Latin America by late 2026, potentially driving down costs further. As a result, these manufacturing facilities will bypass import tariffs while reducing transportation costs for the expanding Latam EV market.

Regional battery material demand will surge as local EV production scales rapidly across Latin America. Lithium, cobalt, nickel, and other critical minerals consumption will increase substantially to support growing battery manufacturing requirements. However, Latin America possesses significant lithium reserves, particularly in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile, creating opportunities for vertical supply chain integration.

Global EV sales exceeded 17 million units in 2024, capturing 20% market share worldwide. The IEA projects 2025 sales will surpass 20 million units, representing over 25% of global automotive sales. Consequently, the Latam EV market expansion contributes meaningfully to this accelerating global electrification trend.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Latam EV market boom signals a fundamental shift in global battery materials demand geography, with Chinese manufacturers leveraging cost advantages to penetrate price-sensitive emerging markets. This expansion will create substantial new demand for lithium, cobalt, and nickel while potentially enabling Latin America to capture more value from its abundant critical mineral resources through local processing and battery manufacturing integration.

Cornex–Dongfeng power battery deal signals deeper EV supply-chain ties

Cornex

Cornex–Dongfeng power battery deal anchors five-year growth for both firms. The Cornex–Dongfeng power battery deal covers over 30GWh of supply. Therefore, the Cornex–Dongfeng power battery deal strengthens downstream EV launches and commercial fleets.

China’s battery demand keeps accelerating on EV and storage growth. Cornex will also expand R&D cooperation with Dongfeng Liuzhou. As a result, the partners can tailor pack designs and logistics. They did not disclose prices or delivery cadence.

Upstream security: LFP cathode and copper foil locked in

Cornex moved early to secure key feedstocks this year. It signed 150,000t of LFP cathode with Jiangsu Lopal in May. It added 152,000t of LFP from EVE Energy in June. It also secured 160,000t of copper foil from Nuode over five years. Consequently, the cell maker reduces cost volatility and quality risk across its lines.

Meanwhile, China’s battery ecosystem continues to scale. Power battery output reached 831.1GWh in January–July. Installed volumes hit 355.4GWh over the same period. Year-on-year growth was 58% and 45%, respectively. Those tailwinds support OEM ramp schedules and fleet electrification.

Market position: modest share, rising trajectory

Cornex installed 2.42GWh of LFP packs in January–July. That equals 0.7% of China’s installed base. However, it remains a top-15 domestic LFP installer. Therefore, the Dongfeng anchor order could accelerate share gains. R&D collaboration should compress qualification timelines and improve pack energy density.

Dongfeng plans passenger and commercial EV expansion. Cornex’s secured materials and new contracts improve delivery certainty. As a result, both sides can plan platform roadmaps with clearer cost curves.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Anchor agreements matter most when paired with upstream hedges. Cornex’s cathode and copper-foil locks de-risk this award and future bids. Watch how quickly the pair converts framework supply into model-specific SOP schedules and sustained monthly GWh.

Volkswagen Secures Long-Term Lithium Supply with Patriot Battery Metals

Patriot Battery Metals

Volkswagen, through its battery subsidiary PowerCo, has sealed a decade-long offtake agreement with Patriot Battery Metals, a Canadian lithium explorer, to source 100,000 metric tonnes per year (t/yr) of spodumene concentrate (SC). This deal is a strategic move to secure critical lithium resources as Volkswagen continues to expand its electric vehicle (EV) and battery production globally.

Patriot’s Shaakichiuwaanaan Asset Powers the Deal

The spodumene concentrate will be supplied from Patriot's Shaakichiuwaanaan Mineral Resources in Quebec, Canada. Notably, this resource is the largest lithium pegmatite deposit in the Americas and the eighth-largest globally, making it a vital supply chain asset for lithium-ion battery production. The concentrate will have a target grade of 5.5% lithium oxide, ideal for battery applications.

PowerCo plans to use the raw materials to fuel its gigafactories in Europe and North America, including its St. Thomas, Canada facility, which is set to be its largest cell factory, boasting a production capacity of up to 90 GWh per year.

Volkswagen Invests in Patriot and Future Lithium Conversion

As part of the partnership, Volkswagen has invested $48 million for a 9.9% stake in Patriot Battery Metals, signaling its commitment to long-term lithium sourcing. The deal also hints at future collaborations, including the potential development of a lithium conversion facility to ensure supply chain resilience and further vertical integration.

Volkswagen’s EV Push Faces Challenges

Volkswagen has delivered 506,500 battery electric vehicles (BEVs) globally from January to September 2024, a 4.7% decline year on year. Despite overall growth in North America, BEV deliveries in the US fell by 26%, reflecting competitive challenges in the region.

In Europe, Volkswagen remains dominant with a 19% market share in the BEV segment, reaffirming its stronghold. To bolster its EV ecosystem, the German automaker also formed a $5.8 billion joint venture with Rivian in November 2024 to advance software and electronics architectures for scalable EV platforms.

Strategic Significance

This agreement underscores the importance of securing stable, long-term access to critical minerals like lithium as automakers ramp up EV production. It also highlights Canada’s growing role as a key player in the global battery supply chain, thanks to its abundant natural resources and strategic partnerships with major manufacturers like Volkswagen.

Ford First-Quarter Sales Fell as Aluminium Supply and EV Weakness Hit Deliveries

Ford EV

Ford first-quarter sales fell in January-March as lower F-Series truck deliveries, weaker EV demand, and aluminium supply disruption weighed on the US automaker. Total vehicle sales declined by 8.8% on the year to 457,000 units.

Ford first-quarter sales were affected by production timing as the company worked to recover lost output tied to Novelis outage at its Oswego, New York, aluminium rolling facility. The disruption has exposed how dependent high-volume vehicle platforms are on stable aluminium sheet supply.

Ford first-quarter sales also reflected weaker electric vehicle momentum. Sales of all-electric and hybrid models fell by 35% to 48,000 units, while internal combustion engine vehicle sales declined by 4.3% to around 409,000 units.

F-Series Production Shows Aluminium Supply Chain Vulnerability

Ford’s F-Series truck sales fell by 16% on the year to 160,000 units in the first quarter. F-150 production declined by 11% to 137,700 trucks, while Super Duty output dropped by 17% to 74,900 units.

The decline matters because the F-Series is one of Ford’s most important profit engines. Any production disruption in the truck platform can have an outsized effect on revenue, margins, dealer inventory, and supplier scheduling.

The Novelis Oswego outage remains a key constraint. Ford expects the recovery in vehicle production to be weighted toward the second half of 2026, while warning that Novelis’ restart could be uneven.

Ford previously estimated that temporary aluminium sourcing costs could reach $1.5bn-2.5bn this year because of the Oswego fires. That cost pressure shows how one upstream rolling disruption can flow directly into automotive manufacturing economics.

EV Sales Weakness Adds Pressure to Ford’s Product Mix

Ford first-quarter sales were also hit by the company’s shift away from some EV production and the expiration of EV tax credits. Reduced availability of discontinued models added further pressure to deliveries.

SUV sales fell by 7.8% to 186,000 units, while Mustang sales rose by 50% to 14,000 units. This mixed performance shows that Ford’s portfolio remains uneven as the company balances combustion vehicles, hybrids, EVs, and high-margin trucks.

The EV decline is strategically important because automakers are still trying to manage battery costs, consumer demand, policy incentives, and production discipline. Lower EV volumes can affect demand for battery materials, power electronics, aluminium structures, copper wiring, and rare earth magnet supply chains.

For the wider metals market, the bigger lesson is clear. Automotive demand is not only shaped by consumers, but also by material availability, rolling capacity, battery economics, and policy support.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Ford’s results show that automotive production is now highly exposed to upstream material bottlenecks. The Novelis outage turned aluminium sheet supply into a direct constraint on truck output, while weaker EV sales added another layer of demand uncertainty.