Japan EU battery recycling alliance aims to cut China dependence

Japan, EU battery alliance

Japan EU battery recycling alliance marks a strategic push to reduce reliance on China in battery materials. The new Japan EU battery recycling alliance brings together key industry groups to strengthen recycling, black mass handling and data sharing. As a result, the Japan EU battery recycling alliance targets a more resilient and transparent battery supply chain across both regions.

Japan EU battery recycling alliance links tech strength and market scale

The Japan EU battery recycling alliance is built around three core industry associations. Japan’s Battery Association for Supply Chain, the European Battery Alliance and Brussels based Recharge have signed an initial agreement. Together, they will cooperate on improving recycling processes, materials flows and supply chain governance.

The agreement covers information exchange on issues such as data sharing and regulatory interpretation. It also includes joint studies on black mass classification, a key bottleneck for cross border recycling flows. Black mass refers to shredded cathode material containing nickel, cobalt and lithium from spent batteries. Therefore, clear definitions and standards for black mass are critical for trade, permitting and ESG compliance.

Japanese officials highlight the importance of combining Japan’s technology strength with Europe’s market size. Japan offers advanced recycling technologies and process know how developed over decades of battery manufacturing. Meanwhile, Europe provides a rapidly growing battery market driven by EV mandates and energy storage deployment. This mix gives the Japan EU battery recycling alliance strong industrial foundations.

Reducing strategic exposure to China dominated battery materials

The Japan EU battery recycling alliance clearly responds to geopolitical supply concerns. Officials from Japan’s trade and industry ministry note that the current battery supply chain depends heavily on one country. Although unnamed, the reference clearly points to China’s dominance in processed lithium, nickel, cobalt and anode materials.

By deepening cooperation, Tokyo and Brussels aim to reduce vulnerability to export controls or political friction. Recycling and black mass trade can partially offset primary supply risks from Chinese refineries and processors. In addition, improved data sharing should help track origin, quality and ESG performance of recovered materials. As a result, the Japan EU battery recycling alliance supports compliance with emerging battery passport and due diligence rules.

The initiative also fits within the broader Japan EU competitiveness alliance launched in July. That framework seeks closer coordination on semiconductors, clean energy, critical minerals and industrial standards. Battery recycling now becomes a visible test case for how quickly the partnership can move from statements to practical projects.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This partnership underlines how recycling is moving from a niche activity to a core pillar of battery security strategy. If the Japan EU battery recycling alliance can harmonise black mass standards and data systems, it will lower barriers for serious cross regional recycling investment. Market participants should watch for pilot projects, joint ventures and regulatory tweaks that follow this initial, largely framework level agreement.

HyProMag Rare Earth Magnet Recycling Plant Opens in Germany

HyProMag

HyProMag rare earth magnet recycling has moved into commercial-scale production in Germany after the company opened a new recycling and manufacturing plant in Pforzheim. The facility strengthens Europe’s effort to build a circular rare earth magnet supply chain outside China.

HyProMag rare earth magnet recycling will focus on neodymium-iron-boron magnets and alloys. The plant will start with 100 t/yr of production capacity, with plans to increase output to 350 t/yr.

HyProMag rare earth magnet recycling is strategically important because NdFeB magnets are critical for electric vehicles, wind turbines, robotics, electronics, defence systems and industrial motors. Europe needs more local magnet capacity as China continues to dominate rare earth processing and magnet production.

The plant is permitted for production of up to 750 t/yr. HyProMag and parent company Mkango Resources are evaluating a scale-up to that level over the next three years.

HPMS Technology Targets Magnet Scrap Recovery

The Pforzheim plant will use Hydrogen Processing of Magnet Scrap technology, known as HPMS. The process was developed at the University of Birmingham and is designed to recover rare earth magnets from scrap streams more efficiently.

This technology matters because magnet recycling can reduce dependence on mined rare earth feedstock and conventional separation routes. It can also shorten supply chains by recovering material already embedded in end-of-life products and industrial scrap.

Recycled NdFeB magnets can support European manufacturers that need secure and traceable supply. Automotive, wind power, electronics and defence customers increasingly want material with clearer origin and lower supply-chain risk.

The initial 100 t/yr capacity is modest compared with China’s magnet industry. However, the strategic value lies in proving that commercial-scale recycling and magnet manufacturing can operate inside Europe.

The planned expansion to 350 t/yr, and potentially 750 t/yr, would make the site more meaningful for regional supply. It would also help Europe develop technical expertise in magnet scrap collection, processing, alloying and remanufacturing.

EU Critical Raw Materials Strategy Gains Recycling Base

HyProMag’s German plant fits directly into Europe’s critical raw materials strategy. The EU wants to reduce dependence on imported rare earth materials by supporting domestic mining, separation, recycling and manufacturing capacity.

Mkango Resources adds another layer to this strategy. The Canadian company owns a rare earths project in Malawi and a proposed rare earths separation plant in Poland.

Both projects have been selected as strategic projects under the EU Critical Raw Materials Act. This gives Mkango a broader position across upstream rare earth resources, midstream separation and downstream magnet recycling.

The German plant therefore is not just a standalone recycling facility. It could become part of a wider European rare earth value chain connecting African feedstock, European separation and recycled magnet production.

For Europe, this model is important. Mining alone will not solve rare earth dependence if separation, metal making, alloying and magnet manufacturing remain concentrated elsewhere.

HyProMag’s Pforzheim facility helps address one of the most difficult parts of the chain: turning rare earth scrap into usable magnet products. If the company scales successfully, it could support a more resilient European magnet ecosystem.

The Metalnomist Commentary

HyProMag’s plant shows that Europe’s rare earth strategy is moving from policy ambition into industrial execution. The key test will be whether recycling capacity can scale fast enough to supply real magnet demand in EVs, wind power and defence.

EU US Critical Minerals Action Plan Targets Supply Chain Security

US EU

EU US Critical Minerals Action Plan marks a deeper transatlantic effort to secure strategic raw materials as China export controls and global protectionism reshape industrial supply chains. The US and EU have signed the plan to diversify sourcing, strengthen resilience and coordinate responses to mineral supply disruptions.

The EU US Critical Minerals Action Plan is significant because it moves beyond general diplomatic language. It allows both sides to use trade and market tools, including border-adjusted price floors, standards-based markets, subsidies to close price gaps and offtake agreements.

The EU US Critical Minerals Action Plan also includes stockpile cooperation, technical coordination, regulatory alignment and standards for mining, processing and recycling. This shows that Washington and Brussels are now treating critical minerals as industrial security assets, not only commodity inputs.

Price Floors and Offtake Tools Signal Stronger Market Intervention

The plan highlights a major shift in western raw materials policy. The US and EU are preparing to coordinate tools that can make non-China supply more commercially viable.

Border-adjusted price floors could help protect strategic mineral projects from low-cost competition. This matters because many western projects struggle to compete against established Chinese processing chains when prices fall.

Subsidies to address price gaps serve the same purpose. They can help bridge the cost difference between secure, traceable supply and cheaper material from dominant incumbent producers.

Offtake agreements are also central. Long-term purchase commitments can give miners, refiners and recyclers the revenue visibility needed to finance new capacity.

This is especially important for rare earths, gallium, germanium, graphite, lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese and other strategic materials. Many of these markets are small, volatile or heavily concentrated in processing.

The plan also points to standards-based markets. This could support supply chains where environmental, labour, traceability and security standards become part of pricing.

For suppliers, the message is clear. Western buyers may increasingly pay for origin, compliance and resilience, not only the lowest spot price.

Transatlantic Coordination Raises Pressure on China-Linked Supply Chains

The plan will be implemented by the office of the US trade representative and the European Commission’s Directorate-General for trade and economic security. That structure places critical minerals directly inside trade and economic security policy.

The US has already moved aggressively in critical minerals. It has used the Defense Production Act, supported price floors and offtake agreements, and invested in overseas mineral assets to reduce reliance on China.

The EU has historically been more cautious about direct market intervention. However, its position is changing as supply risks increase and European manufacturers face tighter access to strategic raw materials.

Earlier this month, the European Commission launched a critical raw materials platform to match EU buyers with suppliers and aggregate demand. The new US-EU action plan builds on that direction and gives Europe a broader external coordination channel.

Rapid response mechanisms are also important. Export controls, shipping disruption, sanctions or sudden shortages can quickly affect defence, semiconductors, batteries, magnets, aerospace and clean energy manufacturing.

Stockpile cooperation could provide a temporary buffer. But the larger strategic goal is to build durable supply, processing and recycling capacity across allied economies.

The plan therefore strengthens the policy architecture for western mineral security. It also raises the likelihood that future raw material trade will be shaped by origin rules, price support, industrial standards and government-backed purchasing.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU-US plan shows that critical minerals policy is moving from risk awareness to market design. The decisive question is whether price floors, offtakes and subsidies can create real processing capacity before the next supply shock hits.

EU CRMA Strategic Projects Delay Raises Questions Over Critical Minerals Execution

the Critical Raw Materials Act

EU CRMA strategic projects are facing a likely delay as Brussels postpones the next batch of designations under the Critical Raw Materials Act. The announcement was initially expected between mid-May and June, but market sources now expect the process to run into autumn.

EU CRMA strategic projects are intended to accelerate domestic and allied supply chains for critical minerals. The strategic label can give projects faster permitting and better access to EU financing.

EU CRMA strategic projects matter because Europe has set ambitious 2030 targets for extraction, processing and recycling. Any delay risks slowing investment decisions at a time when the bloc is trying to reduce dependence on concentrated foreign supply chains.

The European Commission selected 60 projects in the first round across the EU and partner countries. The second round drew 161 applications, showing strong industry interest but also increasing administrative complexity.

Battery and Rare Earth Projects Dominate Applications

The second round of applications shows where Europe’s supply-chain priorities are concentrated. Of the 161 applications, 95 came from inside the EU and 66 from outside.

Battery-related projects dominated the list with 75 applications. This reflects Europe’s continued effort to build supply chains for lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, graphite and other battery materials.

Rare earths were another major focus, with 21 applications. These projects are strategically important because Europe remains highly dependent on China for rare earth separation, metals, alloys and permanent magnets.

The strategic label is expected to help selected projects access financing under the Resource Action Plan and benefit from accelerated permitting. That support is important because critical minerals projects face high capital costs, long timelines and uncertain market economics.

However, the delay shows that project selection is not simple. The EU must assess technical readiness, strategic value, permitting status, financing needs, environmental standards and supply-chain contribution.

For developers, uncertainty over designation timing can affect financing discussions, offtake negotiations and investment decisions. A project may be commercially promising, but delays in policy support can slow its path to construction.

Europe’s Raw Materials Targets Face Execution Risk

The CRMA sets clear 2030 goals. The EU wants domestic extraction to cover at least 10% of annual consumption, processing to cover at least 40%, and recycling to cover at least 25%.

These targets are ambitious because Europe has limited mining capacity in several critical minerals and remains weak in key midstream stages. Processing and refining remain the hardest gaps to close.

The first round of strategic projects gave the market a positive signal. But industry participants are now questioning whether the mechanism is delivering meaningful progress quickly enough.

The European Court of Auditors warned in February that the EU risks missing its raw materials targets. It pointed to unclear selection criteria and weak data as major concerns.

Transparency has also become a pressure point. Non-governmental organisations and legal groups have challenged the process, arguing that citizens have not received enough disclosure.

This creates a difficult balance for Brussels. The EU wants to accelerate strategic projects, but it must also maintain public trust, environmental credibility and clear selection standards.

The delay is therefore more than an administrative issue. It tests whether Europe can turn critical minerals policy into bankable industrial capacity before global competition locks up capital, feedstock and customers.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The CRMA’s strategic project label is valuable only if it accelerates real investment. Europe has identified the right bottlenecks, but delays in selection and financing risk turning industrial strategy into another slow policy process.

EU RESourceEU action plan accelerates EU critical raw materials supply security

EU, Critical Raw Materials

The EU RESourceEU action plan aims to harden Europe’s critical minerals resilience. European Commission will mobilise close to €3bn within the next 12 months. Therefore, the EU RESourceEU action plan turns the 2024 framework into faster financing.

Funding targets fast-deliverable molybdenum and lithium projects

The plan prioritises projects that can cut strategic dependencies quickly. The European Investment Bank and member states will support two flagship developments. Meanwhile, officials frame these as near-term supply wins.

The first backed project is Greenland Resources’ Malmbjerg molybdenum project in Greenland. The plan links molybdenum supply to defence-sector demand and security priorities. The second supported project is Vulcan Energy Resources lithium extraction project in Germany. As a result, the EU RESourceEU action plan tightens the link between finance and battery raw materials.

Scrap export controls and joint purchasing reshape circular supply

The EU RESourceEU action plan strengthens circular supply through targeted scrap controls. The plan restricts exports of scrap and waste from permanent magnets. It also introduces targeted measures for aluminium scrap to expand EU recycling capacity. However, the plan leaves the door open to copper scrap measures if needed.

The plan also creates a new governance layer for long-term execution. A European Critical Raw Materials Centre will launch from early next year to oversee supply chains. It will provide market intelligence, enable joint purchasing, support stockpiling, and catalyse investment. Therefore, the EU RESourceEU action plan shifts from ad-hoc response to structured procurement power.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU RESourceEU action plan signals a decisive pivot from policy intent to industrial action. Meanwhile, scrap controls will matter as much as new mining in tight markets. Therefore, Europe’s next advantage will come from coordinated purchasing and faster permitting discipline.

EU wind magnet supply resilience: roadmap to cut China dependence by 2030

EU Wind

Europe’s wind industry launched an EU wind magnet supply resilience roadmap to reduce reliance on China. The plan targets 30% “resilient” permanent magnets by 2030. It also aims for 50% by 2035, with 35% rare earths from resilient sources by 2030. This EU wind magnet supply resilience push aligns with the Critical Raw Materials Act and fast-growing offshore wind needs.

OEM actions and timelines to build resilient magnet supply

Manufacturers must move quickly to secure EU wind magnet supply resilience. OEMs will identify alternative magnet suppliers and sign MOUs by mid-2025. They should then qualify and onboard suppliers, with offtakes finalized by end-2026. As a result, resilient production should deliver magnets by late 2028. First “resilient wind turbines” could commission in 2029.

Policy tools, recycling, and market design to diversify sources

The roadmap defines resilience through diversified sourcing across mining, separation, and magnet making. It counts recycled magnets as resilient, supporting circular supply chains. Meanwhile, it urges raw-materials funds, grants, and loans to de-risk projects. It also proposes pooled EU demand, a magnet budget in the Innovation Fund, and a new EU magnet price index.

Europe’s plan responds to tightening Chinese export controls on rare earth magnets. Therefore, OEMs need flexible qualification criteria through 2028 to widen supplier pools. Stricter prequalification may start in 2030, pending review. Ultimately, resilient NdFeB supply should stabilize costs and timelines for offshore wind expansions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This roadmap sets practical milestones that match turbine project cycles. Execution now hinges on rapid financing for European NdPr processing and magnet lines. Watch how recycling volumes and non-Chinese feedstock contracts scale through 2028.

Verde Magnesium Listed as EU Strategic Project

Verde Magnesium

CRMA recognition boosts Romania’s plan to revive European magnesium production

EU Backs Verde Magnesium for Local Supply Security

The EU has designated Verde Magnesium’s Romanian project as a strategic initiative under the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA). This decision aims to re-establish magnesium production within the EU for the first time in over two decades. Verde Magnesium will build an integrated mining and processing facility in Budureasa, Bihor County.

Currently, the EU imports 97% of its magnesium metal from China, creating significant supply risk. As a result, the EU seeks to diversify sourcing and enhance resilience through domestic production. Verde’s project aligns with this goal and will benefit from fast-tracked permitting and regulatory support.

Production Timeline and Investment Outlook

Verde Magnesium expects to begin commercial operations by the end of 2028. Initial production will range from 15,000 to 20,000 t/yr, increasing to 30,000 t/yr in 2030. By 2036, the facility aims to reach peak output of 90,000 t/yr.

However, earlier targets were delayed due to licensing issues with Romania’s National Agency for Mineral Resources. The company finally secured the mining licence in April, allowing development to move forward. Though CRMA designation does not guarantee EU funding, it may unlock institutional investment.

Strategic Material for EU Industry

Magnesium is vital for alloying in aluminium, automotive, aerospace, and defence applications. Its inclusion on the CRMA’s strategic materials list highlights its industrial importance. Verde CEO Alexandru Rosu said the site will become a low-carbon hub for extraction, processing, and recycling in Europe.

France’s Pechiney operated the EU’s last magnesium facility until Chinese imports forced its closure in 2001. Verde’s return could reduce reliance on volatile global supply chains and restore European production capability.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Verde Magnesium’s CRMA status reflects Europe’s intent to de-risk supply chains and revive critical material independence. With high demand across strategic sectors, restoring EU-based magnesium production is both a geopolitical and industrial imperative.

Neo Rare Earth Recycling Deal Strengthens Circular Magnet Supply Chain

Neo performance materials

Neo rare earth recycling plans with Cyclic Materials will support a more circular supply chain for rare earth magnets in Europe and North America. The agreement allows Neo Performance Materials to feed recovered rare earth elements into its alloy and magnet manufacturing operations.

Neo rare earth recycling also aligns with the EU Critical Raw Materials Act, which aims to increase rare earth processing and recycling capacity. This is important because Europe needs more secure access to magnet materials used in EVs, wind turbines, robotics, automation, defence systems, and advanced electronics.

Cyclic Materials recovers rare earth elements from magnet production scrap and end-of-life magnet-bearing materials. Under the agreement, Neo will supply magnet production scrap from its European operations to Cyclic, which will recycle the material into mixed rare earth oxide.

Recycled Rare Earth Oxides Support Neo’s Magnet Platform

Neo will receive mixed rare earth oxides and related products from Cyclic. These materials will come from end-of-life magnets and third-party magnet manufacturing scrap, creating a secondary feedstock stream for Neo’s downstream operations.

This structure matters because rare earth magnet supply chains remain highly exposed to China-dominated processing and refining capacity. Recycling does not eliminate the need for primary rare earth mining, but it can improve resilience, reduce waste, and support traceable supply for strategic customers.

Neo operates a 2,000 t/yr magnet production facility in Estonia and plans to expand it to 5,000 t/yr. A reliable recycled feedstock channel could become more valuable as European magnet production scales and customers demand stronger ESG and supply-chain security credentials.

Cyclic Expands North American Rare Earth Recycling Capacity

Cyclic is building a rare earth recycling campus in South Carolina with initial processing capacity of 2,000 t/yr of magnets. The site is expected to produce 600 t/yr of mixed rare earth oxide, with expansion plans to reach 6,000 t/yr of magnet processing and 1,800 t/yr of MREO output.

The company also has an agreement with Vacuumschmelze to recycle production scrap from the German group’s Sumter, South Carolina, magnet facility. This shows that rare earth recycling is moving from pilot concepts toward integrated industrial supply agreements.

The Neo-Cyclic partnership connects European magnet manufacturing, North American recycling capacity, and recycled rare earth oxide supply. That model could become increasingly important as governments push for domestic and allied rare earth value chains outside China.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Rare earth recycling is becoming a strategic complement to mining and separation, not a side activity. The key advantage will go to companies that can connect scrap collection, oxide recovery, alloying, and magnet production into one qualified supply chain.

EU aluminium scrap export restriction consultation targets rising exports

EU, Aluminium scrap

EU aluminium scrap export restriction policy moved closer on 19 December. The European Commission opened a public consultation on limiting aluminium scrap exports. EU aluminium scrap export restriction aims to address tighter scrap availability in Europe. Therefore, recyclers and traders now face a clear policy timeline.

The consultation asks market participants to comment on trade defence options. Respondents must complete a questionnaire by 31 January. Meanwhile, the Commission will review responses before drafting final measures. The Commission plans to adopt the package in spring 2026.

The consultation tests export duties and tariff rate quotas

The consultation covers export duties and tariff rate quotas for aluminium scrap. These tools can slow outbound flows without banning trade outright. However, the Commission must calibrate measures to avoid unintended disruptions. Therefore, stakeholder feedback will shape the final design.

The Commission framed the process as an economic security and industrial resilience step. Officials want more scrap to stay within EU recycling loops. Meanwhile, downstream buyers want stable pricing and reliable secondary supply. As a result, the policy will influence contracting and inventory strategies.

Aluminium scrap exports squeeze recyclers and reshape pricing power

Aluminium scrap exports rose sharply over recent years. The Commission cited a 50% export increase from 2019 to 1.2mn tonnes in 2024. Higher external bids lifted European scrap prices. As a result, secondary aluminium producers saw margins tighten.

Secondary aluminium supports low-carbon aluminium goals and circular economy targets. However, scrap scarcity can push producers back toward primary metal. Therefore, the EU aluminium scrap export restriction debate links directly to decarbonisation policy. Companies will likely accelerate sorting, upgrading, and closed-loop scrap programs.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This consultation signals a shift from monitoring to intervention in EU scrap flows. However, the final impact depends on quota levels and enforcement quality. The winners will secure domestic scrap streams before spring 2026 rules arrive.

EU Raw Materials Platform Targets Strategic Metals Supply Security

EU, Raw Materials Platform

EU raw materials platform development has advanced as the European Commission launched a new online mechanism to connect European offtakers with suppliers of strategic raw materials. The EU raw materials platform is designed to support demand aggregation, joint purchasing and better market information across critical supply chains.

The platform covers all 17 strategic raw materials listed under the Critical Raw Materials Act. These materials are central to batteries, rare earth magnets, defence systems, semiconductors, renewable energy, advanced manufacturing and industrial resilience.

EU raw materials platform activity will take place through structured rounds. The first diversification round will target operational projects where materials are already available or expected in the near term, with a focus on rare earths, defence-related materials and battery metals.

The mechanism will not provide financing or directly support negotiations. However, it can improve visibility across supply, demand, storage, investment opportunities and financing options, which are often fragmented in strategic raw material markets.

Demand Aggregation Could Strengthen Minor Metals Markets

Demand aggregation is the most important function of the platform. Many strategic materials are needed in small volumes by individual companies, but they carry high industrial and defence value.

This is especially true for minor metals such as gallium and germanium. These materials are used in semiconductors, optics, solar technologies, defence electronics and advanced communications systems, but individual buyers may not require large enough volumes to support new supply projects alone.

Pooling demand can change that equation. If several European buyers aggregate requirements, suppliers may see larger, more stable offtake volumes. This can improve confidence for upstream mining, refining, recycling and midstream processing projects.

The same logic applies to rare earths. Magnet makers, motor producers, defence manufacturers and clean-energy equipment suppliers often need secure access to neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium. Aggregated demand could make European purchasing more credible to non-EU suppliers.

Battery metals may also benefit. Lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese and graphite supply chains are increasingly shaped by long-term offtake, regional qualification and industrial policy. A shared platform can help buyers identify supply options before shortages become acute.

The platform therefore addresses a structural weakness in Europe’s critical materials strategy. Europe has strong downstream industries, but many of those industries purchase strategic metals in fragmented, company-by-company channels.

By collecting and exchanging market data, the mechanism could help convert dispersed demand into more bankable offtake signals. That is important for suppliers seeking financing, customers and predictable long-term buyers.

Platform Supports EU Diversification but Does Not Replace Financing

The EU raw materials platform is part of a broader strategy to reduce external dependencies under the Critical Raw Materials Act. Europe wants to diversify supply, strengthen domestic processing and secure access to materials needed for the energy transition and defence.

However, the mechanism is not a full project-financing tool. Negotiations will take place outside the system, and the platform will not guarantee deals or provide direct financial backing.

This limits what the mechanism can achieve by itself. Strategic raw material projects still need permitting, capital, technology, customer qualification, logistics and long-term price visibility.

But the platform can still play a useful role. It can bring buyers and suppliers into the same market framework, improve demand transparency and identify where joint purchasing could support supply diversification.

The first diversification round will be important because it focuses on projects close to availability. This avoids the problem of relying only on long-dated mining projects that may take years to enter production.

The inclusion of storage options is also relevant. Strategic materials supply security is not only about production. It also depends on inventories, emergency access, buffer stocks and coordinated procurement during disruption.

The broader platform also includes gas and hydrogen mechanisms. This shows that the EU is applying a similar strategic procurement model across energy and raw materials, where fragmented buying can weaken market leverage.

For Europe’s industrial base, the key issue is execution. The platform must move beyond data sharing and create real commercial connections between offtakers and suppliers. Otherwise, it risks becoming another policy tool without enough market impact.

For suppliers, the opportunity is clearer. A credible pool of European demand could make projects more attractive, especially in rare earths, gallium, germanium and battery materials where supply diversification is politically urgent.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU raw materials platform is not a financing solution, but it could become an important demand-signalling tool. Its success will depend on whether Europe can turn fragmented buyer interest into real offtake volumes that support new strategic metals supply.

EU end-of-life vehicles regulation sets recycled content targets for cars

Recycled content for cars

The EU end-of-life vehicles regulation will set recycled content targets for cars across the bloc. The deal phases in recycled plastics content in new vehicles over the next decade. Therefore, the EU end-of-life vehicles regulation reshapes how automakers source plastics, steel, and aluminium.

The European Parliament and EU states reached a provisional agreement on the rules. The plan sets 15% recycled plastics in six years. It then rises to 25% in ten years. Meanwhile, 20% of those plastics must come from end-of-life vehicles or reused components.

Recycled steel and aluminium targets move to a feasibility phase

Targets for recycled steel and aluminium will follow later. The European Commission will run feasibility studies first. As a result, the EU end-of-life vehicles regulation creates a staged pathway for metal recycling mandates.

This approach gives industry time to validate scrap availability and quality. However, it still signals future demand for low-carbon secondary aluminium and recycled steel. Therefore, suppliers should prepare for tighter traceability and mass-balance scrutiny.

Producer responsibility and export rules tighten material retention

The agreement expands collection and depollution rules to more vehicle categories. It will cover heavy-duty vehicles, motorcycles, and special purpose vehicles. Meanwhile, the regulation will introduce a cross-border extended producer responsibility scheme three years after entry.

Manufacturers will carry financial and organisational responsibility across the vehicle lifecycle. The rules also aim to distinguish used vehicles from end-of-life vehicles more clearly. Five years after entry, the EU will ban exports of non-roadworthy used vehicles.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This policy pushes the auto supply chain toward circular materials at scale. However, recycled aluminium and steel targets will hinge on scrap sorting and clean-stream capacity. Therefore, early movers in certified recycling and traceable alloys gain leverage.

Li-Cycle Signs Exclusive Recycling Agreement with EU EV Manufacturer

Li-Cycle

Li-Cycle Partners with European Luxury EV Maker for Battery Recycling

Canadian lithium-ion battery recycler Li-Cycle has entered into an exclusive recycling agreement with a high-performance luxury electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer in the European Union. While the name of the manufacturer and specific details regarding the agreement remain undisclosed, this collaboration is set to play a crucial role in the circular economy of the electric vehicle industry.

Enhancing Battery Recycling Operations in Germany

The agreement ensures a steady supply of feedstock from the EV production facility located in the European Union to Li-Cycle’s spoke facility in Magdeburg, Germany. Li-Cycle operates a spoke-and-hub network, where used batteries are first shredded into black mass at the spokes. This black mass is then processed at the hubs to extract valuable materials such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel, which are essential for the production of new batteries.

Li-Cycle's expansion into Germany is a significant step in its mission to build a sustainable solution for lithium-ion battery recycling. The company’s innovative process helps recover critical raw materials, ensuring the responsible disposal and reuse of EV batteries in Europe.

A Strong Financial Backing for Growth

In November 2022, Li-Cycle secured a loan of up to $475 million from the US Department of Energy, which was later upsized by $100 million. This funding boosts the company’s ability to expand its operations and facilities globally, including its new venture in Germany. With the growing demand for EVs and the rise in battery recycling needs, Li-Cycle is well-positioned to serve as a key player in the transition to a greener future.

Conclusion: A Key Step in EV Battery Sustainability

Li-Cycle’s exclusive agreement with an EU-based luxury EV manufacturer signals a promising future for battery recycling. The partnership not only contributes to the global push for sustainability but also strengthens Li-Cycle's role in the critical metals supply chain. As the electric vehicle industry continues to grow, so does the demand for sustainable solutions to manage battery waste and recover valuable materials.

CBAM Article 27a Deletion Would Tighten EU Carbon Border Rules

CBAM

CBAM article 27a deletion would make the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism more rigid, predictable and difficult to suspend. The European Parliament’s environment committee is preparing to propose removing the clause that would allow temporary exemptions from CBAM under serious and unforeseen circumstances.

The proposal comes from a draft legal report prepared by Dutch centre-left MEP Mohammed Chahim. It signals that parliament may push for a tougher CBAM framework than some member states or industrial importers would prefer.

CBAM article 27a deletion matters because exemptions could weaken the market signal behind the carbon border system. If importers believe CBAM can be paused during disruption, the mechanism may lose some of its pricing certainty and investment value.

The draft instead proposes a narrower system for exceptional cases linked to prolonged military conflict. In those situations, the European Commission would assess whether affected operators can still comply with CBAM requirements.

This approach keeps the mechanism intact while recognising that war can disrupt reporting, verification, logistics and administrative compliance. It also avoids creating a broad exemption channel that could be used during ordinary market stress.

The proposal shows how CBAM is shifting from launch-stage implementation toward legal hardening. The EU is now debating how much flexibility the system should allow without undermining its role as a carbon-cost equalisation tool.

Parliament Seeks Fewer Exemptions and Rejects Article 6 Credits

The most important legal change is the proposed removal of article 27a. That article would allow goods to be temporarily exempted from CBAM during serious and unforeseen circumstances.

The environment committee draft argues that this flexibility could weaken CBAM’s strength and predictability. Predictability is central to the mechanism because importers, exporters and industrial buyers need to know how carbon costs will apply over time.

A broad exemption article could also create lobbying pressure during periods of high energy prices, trade disruption or geopolitical tension. Once a suspension route exists, affected industries may push to use it whenever CBAM costs become commercially painful.

CBAM article 27a deletion would therefore protect the mechanism from becoming too politically adjustable. That is important as the EU begins phasing down free allowances under the emissions trading system and shifting more carbon-cost exposure toward imports.

The draft does not ignore exceptional disruption entirely. It proposes a replacement article focused on prolonged military conflict and its impact on affected regions.

This is a narrower and more defensible framework. A military conflict can prevent companies from collecting emissions data, meeting verification requirements or maintaining normal trade documentation. But that is different from giving broad exemptions whenever market conditions become difficult.

The draft also proposes removing language that would allow the EU to consider carbon credits issued under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement as part of the carbon price already paid on CBAM-covered goods.

This is strategically significant. Article 6 credits could, in theory, reduce CBAM liabilities if foreign producers claim they have already paid a carbon price through internationally recognised credits. But the draft calls this premature and counterproductive.

The concern is credibility. International carbon credits can vary widely in price, quality and environmental integrity. Allowing them into CBAM too early could weaken the mechanism and create disputes over whether credits represent real emissions reductions.

This is especially important for heavy industry. Steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers and other CBAM-covered sectors need clear rules on what counts as a paid carbon cost. If low-cost or low-integrity credits reduce CBAM exposure, EU producers may argue that the system fails to protect them from carbon leakage.

By rejecting Article 6 credits, the draft keeps CBAM tied more closely to direct carbon pricing and verifiable emissions. That would make the system stricter, but also simpler for enforcement.

The legal direction is clear. Parliament’s environment committee appears to favour a CBAM model with limited exemptions, cautious treatment of offsets and stronger predictability for industry.

For exporters into the EU, this raises the compliance threshold. They will need credible emissions data, verified reporting and direct carbon-cost evidence rather than relying on broad exemptions or international credit claims.

Sector Expansion and Indirect Emissions Could Widen CBAM’s Industrial Reach

The draft also points toward a broader CBAM after the next review, scheduled by the end of 2027. It says the EU should consider expanding the mechanism’s sectoral scope to additional industries.

The sectors identified include organic chemicals, polymers and scrap materials from pulp, paper and glass. These areas have already been assessed as technically feasible for inclusion by the Commission.

This matters because CBAM currently focuses on a narrower set of carbon-intensive sectors. Expanding into chemicals and polymers would move the mechanism deeper into industrial supply chains and downstream manufacturing.

Organic chemicals and polymers are especially important because they sit inside a wide range of finished goods. If CBAM expands into these materials, the mechanism could affect packaging, automotive parts, consumer goods, industrial components and many other value chains.

Including scrap materials from pulp, paper and glass would also widen the mechanism’s reach into recycling and secondary raw materials. This could create new reporting challenges because scrap flows often involve mixed origins, complex supply chains and variable embedded emissions.

The draft also calls for CBAM to gradually cover indirect emissions in more sectors. Indirect emissions are already included for fertilisers and cement, but not across all covered products.

This could become one of the most important future changes. Indirect emissions reflect the carbon intensity of electricity used in production. For sectors such as aluminium, steel and chemicals, power sourcing can materially change total embedded emissions.

If indirect emissions are added more broadly, exporters using coal-heavy power systems could face higher CBAM costs. Producers using renewable, nuclear or lower-carbon power could gain a competitive advantage.

This would sharpen CBAM’s industrial effect. The mechanism would no longer focus mainly on direct process emissions. It would also reward cleaner electricity systems and penalise high-carbon power inputs.

The draft asks the Commission to present a proposal by the end of 2027 after assessing technical and policy options. This creates a clear timeline for companies to prepare.

For metals producers, the direction is important. Aluminium and ferro-alloy production are highly electricity-intensive. If indirect emissions become more widely included, power procurement, renewable energy contracts and verified electricity data will become central to EU market access.

For chemical and polymer exporters, CBAM expansion could introduce carbon reporting into supply chains that have not yet faced the same level of scrutiny. This may force producers to improve emissions measurement well before formal inclusion.

The parliamentary timeline is also taking shape. The environment committee is expected to consider the proposed changes on 4-5 May and vote on whether to advance them on 6 July.

If approved, an indicative plenary vote is scheduled for 14 September. That vote would formalise the European Parliament’s position before negotiations with EU member states on the final legal text.

The draft follows a compromise proposed by the EU Council presidency, which had already suggested changes to article 27a. This means both parliament and member states are now actively shaping the flexibility, scope and legal strength of CBAM.

The key issue is balance. Industry wants clarity and workable compliance. Policymakers want to preserve the environmental and competitiveness purpose of the system. Exporters want flexibility during disruption. EU producers want strong protection against carbon leakage.

CBAM article 27a deletion sits at the centre of that debate. It would reduce the risk of temporary exemptions weakening the mechanism, but it would also make compliance more demanding during periods of market stress.

For global suppliers, the message is straightforward. CBAM is unlikely to become a soft or easily suspended regime. The EU is moving toward tighter verification, fewer loopholes and possible expansion into more industrial sectors.

The Metalnomist Commentary

CBAM article 27a deletion would make the EU carbon border system more credible, but also less forgiving. The bigger strategic signal is that Brussels is preparing to expand CBAM from a narrow carbon-pricing tool into a wider industrial competitiveness framework.

Derichebourg Recycling Results Rise on Non-Ferrous Strength and Scrap Policy Support

Chhattisgarh, Ferro‑alloy

Derichebourg recycling results improved in the first half of the company’s 2025-26 financial year as stronger non-ferrous demand, higher prices and increased metal volumes lifted earnings. The French recycling group reported Ebitda of €177.8mn for October-March, up almost 10% from a year earlier.

Derichebourg recycling results show how metal recyclers are benefiting from two linked forces. Non-ferrous scrap demand remains firm, while European steel policy is encouraging mills to source more feedstock from within the region.

Derichebourg recycling results also point to continued momentum in the second half. The company expects April-September performance to be comparable to the first half and forecasts full-year Ebitda of €350mn-370mn.

The market responded positively to the filing, with Derichebourg’s share price rising above €10 from €9.50 after the results were released.

Non-Ferrous Metals Drive Earnings Growth

Non-ferrous metals were the main earnings driver. Derichebourg sold 357,100t of non-ferrous metals in the first half, up 4.4% from a year earlier.

Revenue from the non-ferrous segment rose by nearly 20% to €1bn. The average non-ferrous price was almost 15% higher than in the same period last year.

Copper sales were especially strong, rising by 17%. Aluminium sales, excluding ingots, increased by 10%, supported by firm industrial demand.

However, the picture was not uniformly positive. Aluminium ingot sales fell by 15%, while lead sales dropped by 4%, mainly because of weaker demand from the automotive industry.

This split matters for recyclers. Copper and aluminium scrap remain exposed to electrification, infrastructure and industrial manufacturing, while automotive weakness can still pressure selected downstream products.

Derichebourg’s non-ferrous performance shows that scrap is becoming a strategic raw material, not only a waste recovery business. Buyers increasingly need reliable recycled metal flows for cost control, carbon reduction and supply security.

CBAM and Steel Quotas Support Ferrous Scrap Outlook

Ferrous scrap revenue fell by 5% to €649.9mn because lower average prices offset higher volumes. Derichebourg sold 2.13mn t of ferrous scrap, up 2.2% from a year earlier.

European mills increased scrap purchases ahead of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism coming into force in January. CBAM has added complexity to imported steel and raw material calculations, pushing some steelmakers toward European suppliers.

The company also expects ferrous scrap demand to strengthen after the EU introduces new steel quotas and customs duties in July. These measures could support regional scrap flows by making local feedstock more attractive.

Turkey also contributed to stronger scrap demand as steel production increased. That remains important because Turkish mills are major seaborne scrap buyers and can influence European collection and export markets.

Derichebourg is also expanding geographically. The company agreed to acquire Germany’s Scholz Recycling, which operates 180 sites including joint ventures across Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia, Austria and Romania.

The deal is expected to close in the second half of 2026. It will strengthen Derichebourg’s recycling network in eastern Europe, where its presence has been smaller.

The acquisition fits the wider market direction. European recyclers are scaling up as policy, carbon rules and industrial demand make scrap supply more valuable.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Derichebourg’s results show that recycling is becoming a policy-supported industrial supply chain. CBAM, steel trade measures and non-ferrous demand are turning scrap networks into strategic assets for European metals security.

EU Selects 47 Strategic Raw Materials Projects Under CRMA

EU

New Projects Aim to Boost European Raw Material Independence

The European Commission has announced 47 strategic raw materials projects across 13 EU countries under the Critical Raw Materials Act. These initiatives are part of the EU’s push to reduce foreign dependence and strengthen domestic supply chains by 2030.

The selected projects span extraction, processing, recycling, and substitution of key metals like lithium, nickel, and graphite. In total, they are expected to require €22.5 billion ($24.3 billion) in capital investment, with an accelerated permitting timeline.

Lithium and Nickel Dominate Strategic Focus

Among the 47 projects, 22 are focused on lithium, 12 on nickel, and 10 on cobalt—metals vital for green energy transitions. Projects also cover graphite, manganese, tungsten, and magnesium, all critical for battery, defense, and digital industries. The EU has set targets to meet 10% of its raw material extraction and 40% of processing needs internally by 2030. Savannah Resources’ Barroso lithium project in Portugal is among the featured initiatives with strategic classification status.

Stockpiling and Geopolitical Implications

The Commission is now gathering data on national stockpiles to assess safe storage levels for critical materials across the bloc. An EU raw materials center may coordinate stockpiling efforts starting next year, aligning with global practices in the US and China.

Given global geopolitical shifts, including US leadership changes, the EU is intensifying its focus on material security strategies. Officials stress that European clean tech independence should not lead to new forms of dependency—especially on China.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU's selection of 47 strategic raw materials projects signals a shift toward regional autonomy in critical mineral supply chains. If executed on time, the CRMA framework could reshape Europe's role in the global energy and defense materials landscape. However, execution speed and political cohesion across member states will ultimately determine the strategy’s success.

EGA Leichtmetall Recycling Expansion Signals a Bigger Bet on European Secondary Aluminium

EGA, Recycling Plant

EGA Leichtmetall recycling expansion will lift the Hanover site into a new scale tier. The project will multiply capacity and deepen access to post-consumer aluminium scrap. EGA Leichtmetall recycling expansion also reflects a strategic shift toward recycling-led growth. Therefore, EGA positions itself closer to end markets and circular supply chains.

The Hanover facility currently melts and casts about 30,000 tonnes per year. The new plan adds 110,000 tonnes per year of scrap sorting capacity. It also adds 153,000 tonnes per year of melting and casting capacity. As a result, the plant can upgrade feedstock flexibility and expand secondary aluminium output.

X-ray and laser sorting targets higher-quality recycled aluminium

Advanced scrap sorting matters when recyclers chase tighter chemistry limits. X-ray and laser systems can separate alloys with higher precision. However, post-consumer aluminium scrap arrives with mixed grades and contaminants. Therefore, better sorting protects metal yields and finished product consistency.

The expansion aims to produce high-quality aluminium from post-consumer streams. That capability can support automotive, packaging, and general engineering customers. Meanwhile, EU policy pressure continues to favor recycled content and lower embedded carbon. As a result, premium secondary metal can win share over primary in selected applications.

EGA’s global recycling footprint expands alongside US growth plans

This move fits EGA’s acquisitive strategy in foreign markets. EGA acquired Leichtmetall last year as an entry point into European recycling. Meanwhile, EGA also increased its exposure to US secondary aluminium after buying into Spectro Alloys. Therefore, EGA can balance regional scrap markets and customer demand cycles.

EGA has already announced expansions at Spectro Alloys to lift total capacity above 200,000 tonnes per year. The group also signaled long-term interest in US primary capacity and broader upstream options. However, recycling assets deliver faster carbon and market proximity benefits. As a result, projects like Hanover can become the core growth engine through 2028.

The Metalnomist Commentary

EGA is building a two-speed aluminium strategy that pairs scale with circularity. However, execution will hinge on scrap sourcing and product qualification with demanding customers. The winners will be the recyclers who convert mixed scrap into consistent alloys at industrial scale.

Derichebourg Recycling Results Rise on Strong Non-Ferrous Demand

Derichebourg

Derichebourg recycling results strengthened in the first half of its 2025-26 financial year as higher non-ferrous metal volumes and prices lifted profitability. The French recycling group reported Ebitda of €177.8mn for October-March, up almost 10% from a year earlier.

Derichebourg recycling results also benefited from rising copper and aluminium volumes. The company expects similar performance in the April-September second half, supported by firm non-ferrous demand and improving conditions for ferrous scrap.

Derichebourg recycling results highlight a broader shift in Europe. Scrap is becoming more strategically valuable as steelmakers respond to CBAM, new trade measures and pressure to reduce carbon intensity.

Full-year Ebitda is expected at €350mn-370mn. The company’s share price also moved above €10 following the results announcement, from around €9.50 previously.

Copper and Aluminium Lift Non-Ferrous Performance

Derichebourg sold 357,100t of non-ferrous metals during the first half, up 4.4% from a year earlier. Segment revenue increased by almost 20% to €1bn as average non-ferrous prices rose by nearly 15%.

Copper delivered the strongest volume increase, with sales rising by 17%. Aluminium volumes excluding ingots increased by 10%.

These gains show continued demand for recycled metals tied to electrification, infrastructure and industrial manufacturing. Copper scrap is particularly important as buyers look for additional metal units outside constrained primary mine supply.

Aluminium recycling also benefits from tighter sustainability requirements. Secondary aluminium requires significantly less energy than primary production and can help manufacturers lower embedded carbon.

But automotive weakness affected some product categories. Aluminium ingot sales fell by 15%, while lead volumes declined by 4%.

This divergence shows that scrap demand depends heavily on end-use exposure. Copper and processed aluminium benefited from broader industrial demand, while automotive-linked products remained under pressure.

For recyclers, the value proposition is becoming stronger. Industrial customers increasingly need not only scrap availability, but consistent chemistry, traceability and reliable processing.

CBAM and Steel Trade Measures Strengthen Scrap Outlook

Derichebourg’s ferrous scrap revenue fell by 5% to €649.9mn because weaker average prices offset higher sales volumes. Ferrous scrap shipments still increased by 2.2% to 2.13mn t.

European mills increased scrap purchasing ahead of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism entering force in January. Some steelmakers have shifted toward European feedstock to avoid complex CBAM calculations and uncertainty over import-related costs.

This creates a structural advantage for regional scrap suppliers. As carbon becomes part of steel procurement decisions, recycled feedstock can support lower-emission electric arc furnace production and reduce exposure to imported raw materials.

Derichebourg also expects new EU steel quotas and customs duties introduced in July to support ferrous scrap demand. These measures could encourage more regional production and strengthen demand for domestically sourced scrap.

Turkey’s higher steel output has provided additional support because the country remains a major buyer in the international scrap market.

Derichebourg is also expanding its geographic reach through the planned acquisition of Scholz Recycling. Scholz operates 180 sites, including joint ventures, across Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia, Austria and Romania.

The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2026. It will significantly strengthen Derichebourg’s footprint in eastern Europe and expand access to scrap collection networks.

The Metalnomist Commentary

European scrap is becoming an industrial resource rather than simply a recycling product. CBAM, trade protection and stronger demand for low-carbon metals are increasing the strategic value of large collection and processing networks.

EU aluminium scrap export restriction moves toward spring 2026 adoption

EU aluminium scrap

The European Commission launched work on an EU aluminium scrap export restriction to curb “scrap leakage.” Maroš Šefčovič said the measure should arrive in spring 2026. The EU aluminium scrap export restriction aims to secure feedstock for recyclers and downstream producers.

European industry groups have pushed for action for years. However, the pressure intensified after Donald Trump imposed tariffs on primary aluminium imports. Many buyers may shift toward more scrap to reduce duty exposure. Therefore, European exporters could see stronger pull from overseas markets.

Aluminium scrap flows already show the scale of the challenge. The European Union and the United Kingdom exported around 1.6mn tonnes of aluminium scrap in 2024. That volume rose almost 25% versus 2022 and about 60% versus 2019. As a result, policymakers now frame scrap retention as an economic security issue.

Export tariffs or quotas look more likely than a ban

The final instrument is not yet defined. Officials and industry leaders say a full ban is unlikely. However, export tariffs or quotas could deliver immediate friction on outbound scrap.

Industry executives welcomed the signal from Brussels. Hydro extrusions head Paul Warton called the move encouraging. Meanwhile, European Aluminium director-general Paul Voss described current outflows as a market failure. Therefore, the consultation phase will test where the market sees real bottlenecks.

The commission will run a public consultation and gather evidence. That process will shape how any tariffs or quotas apply. Meanwhile, Aluminium Deutschland has also argued for tools that keep scrap in Europe. As a result, the EU aluminium scrap export restriction will likely focus on volumes and verification.

Scrap retention supports low-carbon aluminium and industrial resilience

Scrap retention directly supports lower-carbon aluminium production. Recyclers typically cut energy use versus primary routes, depending on power mix. Therefore, stable scrap supply improves decarbonisation pathways for European manufacturers.

Trade measures could also reshape pricing and contracts. Scrap exporters may face lower netbacks, while domestic buyers may gain supply security. However, overly strict rules could disrupt collection incentives and cross-border trade. As a result, policymakers must balance supply security with healthy recycling economics.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe will not decarbonise aluminium without reliable scrap access at scale. Meanwhile, tariffs and quotas must avoid weakening collection and sorting investment. Therefore, the best design links any restriction to reinvestment in recycling capacity.

Germany Pushes EU to Impose Aluminium Scrap Export Tariffs

Aluminum Scrap

Rising US demand sparks supply concerns and threatens Europe’s circular economy framework

Aluminium Deutschland Warns of Scrap Outflow Risk

Germany's aluminium industry group, Aluminium Deutschland, has urged the EU to impose aluminium scrap export tariffs. This demand follows the United States’ decision to implement a 25% tariff on primary aluminium imports, while keeping aluminium scrap exempt from the tariff.

As a result, US buyers are likely to switch from importing primary aluminium to sourcing cheaper scrap — particularly from Europe. This shift could lead to a serious shortage of scrap for European recyclers, who rely on stable domestic supply for their operations.

US-EU Price Gap Accelerates Market Arbitrage

The arbitrage between US and EU aluminium prices has widened sharply in recent months. According to market data, the premium gap surged from $110/t in November to nearly $700/t in early May 2025. This creates a strong incentive for exporters to redirect scrap to the US market, further tightening EU supply.

Aluminium Deutschland emphasized that this trend could undermine Europe’s recycling industry. President Rob van Gils called for “swift and decisive action” to avoid dismantling years of progress in circular economy infrastructure.

Europe Faces Growing Scrap Scarcity

Europe's aluminium scrap supply is already strained. Sluggish industrial activity has lowered fresh scrap generation, while Asian demand remains strong, forcing EU recyclers to compete globally. If the EU does not act, companies could face escalating shortages, threatening decarbonisation goals and raw materials security.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Germany’s call for aluminium scrap export tariffs reflects a growing geopolitical competition over raw materials. As secondary aluminium becomes a substitute for tariffed primary metal, the EU risks losing strategic feedstock to global arbitrage. Scrap policy will increasingly define the success or failure of Europe’s industrial climate goals.

 

EU Selects 13 Strategic Raw Material Projects Outside the Bloc

EU strategic raw material projects

EU Seeks to Diversify Critical Mineral Supply Chains

The European Commission has approved 13 strategic raw material projects outside the European Union, estimating a total capital investment of €5.5bn ($6.26bn) to bring them online. Chosen from 49 applications, these projects span Brazil, Canada, Greenland, Kazakhstan, Madagascar, Malawi, New Caledonia, Norway, Serbia, South Africa, the UK, Ukraine, and Zambia. Under the 2024 EU Raw Materials Act, the bloc aims by 2030 to domestically extract 10pc, process 40pc, and recycle 25pc of 17 strategic raw materials. Additionally, no single third country should supply more than 65pc of annual EU consumption.

Targeting Lithium, Nickel, Cobalt, Manganese, and Rare Earths

Ten of the approved projects focus on lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, and graphite, while two — Songwe Hill in Malawi and Zandkopsdrift in South Africa — will extract rare earth elements. Other notable initiatives include Rio Tinto’s Jadar lithium and boron project in Serbia, the Integrated Dumont Nickel Project in Canada, Kobaloni Energy’s cobalt processing in Zambia, and Balakhivka Graphite Deposit in Ukraine. The EU will provide coordinated support, including facilitating finance and connecting projects with potential off-takers. Industrial commissioner Stephane Sejourne emphasised that diversifying away from dependency on countries like China is critical, given current reliance levels exceeding 100pc in some refining and recycling segments.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU’s latest selections mark a significant expansion of its global strategic raw material network, signalling an urgent push to secure supplies ahead of the 2030 targets. While the €5.5bn investment is substantial, long-term success will depend on execution speed, environmental considerations, and stable geopolitical relations with host nations.