China’s Predatory Steel Exports : A Threat to Latin America

The Latin American steel industry is grappling with a severe crisis precipitated by China’s predatory trade practices. The influx of cheap Chinese steel has flooded the market, imperiling local producers' livelihoods. Gabriela Fajardo Mejia, an expert in international relations at the University of Navarra, highlighted in her interview with Diálogo Américas that China’s steel overproduction endangers 1.4 million jobs across Latin America’s steel sector, compelling numerous companies to cease operations and lay off workers. Furthermore, Chinese steel production often bypasses established environmental and quality standards, with transparency regulations being routinely ignored.

Henry Ziemer, a researcher at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), pointed out that China's slowdown in real estate and construction has diminished domestic steel demand. Consequently, Chinese producers are compensating for reduced domestic sales through aggressive export strategies. With the U.S. market becoming increasingly inhospitable for Chinese steelmakers, they are now targeting Latin American countries, which present fewer trade barriers, to dispose of their surplus inventory.

The Chinese government's subsidies for steel production and exports during the pandemic exacerbated the issue, leading to a global proliferation of low-cost Chinese steel. In retaliation, Mexico, Chile, and Brazil have significantly raised tariffs on Chinese steel imports to safeguard their domestic industries, and other nations are expected to follow suit. Alejandro Wagner, the former Secretary-General of the Latin American Steel Association (Alacero), indicated in a BBC interview that the influx of inexpensive Chinese steel has caused significant damage to Latin American steel industries, forcing several major companies to halt their operations.

In March, Chilean steelmaker CAP suspended operations at its Huachipato plant due to the unsustainable business environment created by dumped Chinese steel. Operations resumed only after the Chilean government imposed substantial tariffs on Chinese steel. Similarly, Fabio Galan, president of Colombian steelmaker Acerías Pazdelrio, remarked on the devastating economic impact of cheap Chinese steel imports and called for fair competition.

Reports also suggest that Mexico’s iron ore mines, previously plundered by organized crime cartels, were pivotal in transporting stolen ore to China, highlighting the detrimental effects of China’s opaque and unfair trade practices.

Brazilian steel producer Gerdau temporarily laid off workers at its São José dos Campos plant in response to the unfair competition from Chinese steel. CEO Gustavo Werneck emphasized that this action was merely the initial step in tackling the surge of cheap Chinese steel imports.

Fajardo Mejia underscored the subsidies Chinese steel companies receive, enabling them to lower costs without adhering to quality and environmental standards. She also noted the considerable environmental impact, revealing that Chinese steel production emits 45% more CO2 per ton than Latin American production.

As a countermeasure, imposing tariffs on Chinese steel could escalate trade tensions between Latin American countries and China, with potential retaliatory actions from China, known for its coercive diplomacy. Historical instances, such as China’s bans on Argentine soybean products and Canadian canola seeds, exemplify possible consequences.

CSIS researcher Ziemer highlighted that China, the world’s largest steel producer, generates more steel than the combined output of the next nine largest producers, influencing international prices and destabilizing Latin American economies through dumping practices. He proposed that the current scenario offers an opportunity for the U.S. to collaborate with Latin American countries to counteract China’s unfair trade practices and safeguard domestic industries.

Trade Measures to Dominate Steel Industry in 2025: Focus on Imports and Global Overcapacity

China Steel Factory

Trade protection measures have been the focal point of the global steel industry throughout 2024, with little indication of this trend slowing down in 2025. Steel producers, industry associations, and governments worldwide are increasingly advocating for stronger import barriers to safeguard domestic markets and improve the competitiveness of their industries. In particular, European steel mills have been at the forefront of this movement, calling for more robust action to combat what they view as unfair imports and growing overcapacity in the global market.

European Steel Industry Pushes for Stronger Import Protection

Eurofer, the industry association for European steel manufacturers, has been particularly vocal about the need for stronger trade defence instruments. The association has urged the European Union to implement short-term emergency measures, including import tariffication, to curb the influx of low-cost steel products. Eurofer's stance has been largely driven by the EU’s ambitious decarbonisation goals, with the bloc committing billions of euros in investment. Steel producers argue that the EU's current measures are insufficient, particularly in light of increasing steel imports from countries with lower production costs and fewer environmental regulations.

Significant progress has already been made, with Eurofer helping secure changes to the EU’s safeguard system for key products like hot-rolled coils (HRC) and wire rods. Additionally, the EU anti-dumping investigation targeting several HRC suppliers has gained traction, and further investigations are planned on downstream steel products. As European steel suppliers continue to collect evidence of unfair trade practices, more scrutiny is expected on countries like China, India, and Vietnam.

The Impact of Global Overcapacity and Chinese Steel Exports

The issue of global steel overcapacity has also been a major concern. The OECD has raised alarms about the growing steel production capacity, projecting a 158 million tonnes per year increase in global capacity between 2024 and 2026. This expansion, however, comes at a time when global steel demand remains uncertain. Despite this, steel exports from non-OECD countries have been recovering since 2023, particularly from China, whose steel exports surged by 22.6% from January to November 2024.

China has also been exporting record volumes of semi-finished steel, despite the country’s preference for exporting higher-value products. As China continues to ramp up exports, it has attracted the attention of both European and global policymakers, leading to new protectionist measures targeting Chinese steel. This includes potential investigations and pending duties on Chinese steel, which could affect up to 15 million tonnes per year of exports.

Countries like India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Malaysia are also seeing increases in steel exports, contributing to the global capacity glut. Turkey, a major market for Chinese steel, has already imposed duties on imports from China, India, Russia, and Japan in response to the increasing influx of steel from these regions. The EU is similarly considering the inclusion of Indonesia in its safeguard measures due to the country’s rising steel exports to Europe. From July to October 2024, Indonesia exported 494,650 tonnes of HRC to the EU, surpassing the previous half-year period, a trend that is expected to continue.

Investigations and Measures Targeting Global Steel Exporters

The growing export volumes from India and Vietnam, along with the rise in Indonesia’s exports to Europe, have prompted investigations into dumping practices in these countries. The EU has already initiated anti-dumping investigations on steel products from Egypt, Japan, India, and Vietnam, with the preliminary results of these investigations expected in March 2025. If these investigations lead to findings of unfair trade practices, retroactive duties could be applied, further tightening global trade conditions.

In response, producers are gearing up for a potential wave of new safeguard measures and anti-dumping duties. Countries that are impacted by these measures may look to retaliate, creating a complex global trade landscape for steel. As trade protectionism increases, the global steel market is expected to undergo significant shifts in the coming years.

Leveraging Section 301 Tariffs to Combat Circumvention of Chinese Steel and Aluminum Exports

In light of significant government subsidies aiding low-cost Chinese steel and aluminum products, the U.S. steel and aluminum industries advocate for the extension of Section 301 tariffs beyond China to third-party countries. This strategic move aims to shield U.S. industries from the influx of cheap, subsidized materials. The Aluminum Association (AA) and the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) have both submitted statements to the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), urging enhanced enforcement measures to prevent the circumvention of existing tariffs.

Industry Concerns and Actions

The AA emphasized the need to impose anti-dumping and countervailing duties on Chinese imports, which has effectively reduced China's direct exports to the U.S. However, the redirection of these exports to third-party countries has surged, threatening U.S. manufacturers who produce similar goods. Consequently, industry representatives are pushing for the expansion of Section 301 tariffs to encompass processed Chinese steel and aluminum products entering the U.S. via third countries.

The Biden administration, following a review of Section 301 tariffs applied from 2018 to 2022, announced an increase in tariffs on a series of products, including steel and aluminum, effective August 1. Despite this, U.S. industries call for broader application of these tariffs to include circumvention through third-party processing.

Detailed Proposals and Data

In their statement, AISI highlighted the necessity of reinforcing origin regulations for steel products processed in third countries using Chinese materials. The current determination of origin by the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is based on the final substantial transformation location. AISI advocates for considering the melting and pouring locations to prevent unfair trade practices.

Data from the Department of Commerce’s Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System (SIMA) indicate that approximately 1.7 million metric tons of Chinese-origin steel have entered the U.S. since January 1, 2022, with 17% processed in third countries. AISI suspects that actual figures may be higher due to underreported origin data.

Strategic Importance and Recommendations

Expanding Section 301 tariffs to cover Chinese steel and aluminum products processed in third countries would send a strong message of the administration's commitment to combating unfair trade practices and protecting American jobs. The AA further recommended extending these tariffs to aluminum-intensive products manufactured using Chinese aluminum in third countries, aligning with USTR Katherine Tai's goals of protecting U.S. workers and bolstering supply chain resilience.

EU Steel Industry Faces Key Policy Shifts: A Call for Concrete Measures

EU Steel

The mood among European policy makers regarding the steel industry has notably shifted, with increasing support for the sector’s future. According to Axel Eggert, director-general of Eurofer, the European steel industry association, policymakers are beginning to recognize the importance of addressing the growing challenges in global steel production. However, while this shift in mood is encouraging, Eggert emphasized that these positive words must be followed by tangible actions.

Rising Political Support for EU Steel Industry

Eggert pointed out that there is more political backing for the European steel sector, especially as lawmakers become increasingly aware of the massive overcapacity in global steel production, particularly CO2-intensive steel. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) predicts that global steel capacity will grow by 157 million tons over the next three years, which will likely negate the decarbonization efforts of the EU steel industry.

In response, the European Parliament has called for a European steel action plan, which has been embraced by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. However, Eggert stressed that while these statements are promising, they must be followed by concrete measures to ensure the long-term sustainability of the industry.

Green Steel and Public Procurement as Key Measures

One of the critical measures that Eggert advocates for is the implementation of public procurement for green steel. With the EU's ambitious decarbonization targets — a 55% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2050 — Eggert emphasized that EU governments should lead by example. This means prioritizing green steel in public sector construction, vehicles, and other products, which would support European producers committed to decarbonizing their operations.

Global Overcapacity and Trade Distortions Impacting EU Steel

The steel industry crisis is largely driven by global overcapacity and low demand in Europe, exacerbated by high energy costs. Compounding this issue is the low-priced steel being exported by countries like China, Japan, and India, which depresses global markets. China’s exports, in particular, have been an issue for EU steel producers, as the country benefits from state subsidies, leading to significant trade distortions.

Eggert discussed how the EU has implemented anti-dumping measures on stainless steel from Indonesia, but Indonesia has circumvented these by exporting processed steel to third-party countries like Taiwan, Vietnam, and Turkey, which then re-export the products back to the EU. This tactic, along with the support from Chinese investments in Indonesia’s steel industry, has made Indonesia’s steel sector one of the largest globally.

EU Trade-Defense Measures: Need for Improvement

Eurofer has called for enhanced EU trade-defense measures to tackle issues such as dumping and excessive capacity from third countries. Eggert emphasized the need for improved steel safeguards and more effective enforcement of existing trade defense instruments. Currently, anti-dumping duties on Chinese steel are too low, undermining the efficacy of EU trade policies.

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) Concerns

The EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) has been another point of contention. Third countries are already looking to export steel from their lowest CO2-emitting plants to avoid paying CBAM costs. Eggert advocated for including indirect CO2 emissions (Scope 2 emissions) in the CBAM, particularly for stainless steel, which is a major contributor to indirect emissions.

Scrap Export Concerns and India's Decarbonization Challenge

Finally, Eggert addressed concerns from India regarding the potential for a European export ban on scrap metal. While the EU does not currently have a scrap export ban, Eggert pointed out that India itself has export restrictions on scrap and needs to focus more on decarbonizing its domestic steel sector. He also warned that if India delays its decarbonization efforts until 2070, the EU will face a significant disadvantage in the global steel market.

China’s Steel Market Faces Persistent Challenges Despite Stimulus Measures

China’s Steel

Chinese steel prices experienced a modest rebound from multi-year lows in late September, spurred by a series of government stimulus policies. However, the steel market's long-term outlook remains uncertain due to sluggish domestic demand, weakening real estate investments, and global trade barriers.

Steel Prices Rebound, but Demand Stays Weak

Steel prices in China bottomed out in late September, with the People’s Bank of China reducing the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) by 0.5% and lowering mortgage rates. Despite these measures, real estate investments for January-September declined by 10.1% year-on-year, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). The area of new construction projects dropped by 22.2% over the same period, underscoring a lack of recovery in demand.

Domestic steel demand remains heavily tied to new construction and infrastructure projects. However, China’s shift in focus toward existing housing rather than new builds has limited the effectiveness of stimulus policies.

Steel Production Increases Amidst Price Rebound

Chinese steel mills responded to the price recovery by ramping up production. Profits rebounded from losses of Yn150-200 per ton in early September to Yn200-250 per ton by early October. Weekly rebar output reached 2.4 million tons in mid-October, the highest since late June. Blast furnace and electric arc furnace operation rates also hit two-month highs during this period.

Despite increased production, market participants anticipate a dip in construction steel demand from mid-November as northern cities enter the winter heating season.

Steel Exports: A Mixed Bag

Chinese steel exports surged by 21.2% year-on-year in January-September, totaling 80.71 million tons. However, this growth is under threat from rising anti-dumping measures in countries such as Turkey, India, Vietnam, and South Korea. With major overseas markets slowing operations during the Christmas season, export bookings are expected to taper off in December.

Stimulus Measures: Limited Impact on Real Estate

China’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) has announced significant fiscal measures, including a Yn1 trillion issuance of ultra-long special treasury bonds and an increased financial expenditure of Yn180 billion for 2024. Additionally, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MHURD) plans to rebuild 1 million apartments in shanty towns and dilapidated areas. However, these measures are relatively mild compared to the peak of 6 million units rebuilt annually from 2016 to 2018.

To further stimulate the housing market, most cities, except Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, have lifted purchase restrictions. Despite these efforts, the market remains constrained by long-term structural issues.

Market Outlook: Cautious Optimism

Shanghai hot-rolled coil (HRC) prices declined by Yn230 per ton (6.3%) from 7 October to Yn3,420 per ton as of yesterday. Market analysts suggest that while steel prices may not return to their September lows, downward pressure is likely in November and December.

As China continues to navigate economic headwinds, the steel sector’s recovery appears contingent on significant new investments and sustained domestic demand growth. The global context of anti-dumping measures and trade barriers adds another layer of complexity, potentially capping export growth prospects in the near term.

EU Launches Review of Steel Import Safeguard Tariffs: Changes Expected from April 2025

The European Commission(EC)

The European Commission(EC) has officially launched a review of its steel import safeguard tariff-rate quotas, with proposed changes to take effect from 1 April 2025. This review, which follows a request by 13 EU member states on 29 November 2024, aims to address the evolving dynamics of steel imports into the EU. The focus will be on adjusting quotas, particularly in light of a contraction in EU demand and a rise in Chinese steel exports, which have led to shifts in trade flows.

Key Changes Under Review for Steel Safeguard Tariffs

The EC's review will examine several key aspects of the current steel import safeguard measures. Among the possible changes is the introduction of a new quota volume. EU steel producers have expressed concerns that current duty-free quota volumes no longer align with the demand in the EU, with some regions experiencing gaps due to shrinking consumption. Additionally, an increase in Chinese steel exports has led to an influx of steel from other countries into the EU market, further complicating the allocation of quotas.

The EC will reassess how these quotas are managed and allocated. Producers and users have been invited to provide feedback via a questionnaire, which must be submitted by 10 January 2025. Some of the other factors under evaluation include the exclusion of certain developing countries from the safeguard measures based on their 2024 imports, as well as potential updates to the level of liberalization within the quotas.

The steel safeguard measures, which were first introduced provisionally in 2018, became definitive in 2019. Initially set for a three-year period, they were extended for another year until June 2024 and then further extended until June 2026. Recent updates to these measures have had a noticeable impact on trade, particularly with the cap on hot-rolled coils (HRC) and wire rod quotas from ‘other countries’ being limited to 15% per origin. This has resulted in a significant reduction in import opportunities, especially for smaller markets.

The Impact of the Quota Review on Steel Imports

The current steel import safeguard measures have significantly impacted trade flows within the EU. In previous years, quotas would exhaust quickly after being reset each quarter, but the 15% cap on 'other countries' volumes has left a larger portion of the quotas underused. While there were expectations that some countries, like South Korea, could increase exports to the EU in April 2025 when residual quota volumes become available, the upcoming review could alter this outlook.

With EU imports largely unaffected by these changes so far due to a rush to buy final volumes before the duties apply, the redistribution of quotas will be a key focus of the review. The EC aims to ensure that the safeguard measures strike a balance between protecting EU producers and allowing for sufficient import access to meet demand. These changes, when finalized, could have significant implications for steel producers and importers alike, influencing trade relationships and steel prices in the EU market.

South32 Manganese Ore Export Prices Fall as China Demand Weakens

South32 Manganese Ore

South32 manganese ore export prices to China have fallen for June shipments as weak alloy demand, ample port inventories and cautious buying pressure the import market. The Australian diversified metals producer lowered offers for both Australian and South African manganese ore, according to Chinese importers.

South32 manganese ore export prices for Australian 42% lumpy ore fell to $5.40/mtu cif China for June delivery. This was down by $0.50/mtu from May.

South32 also reduced its offer for South African 37% manganese ore to $5/mtu cif China. This was down by $0.40/mtu from the previous month.

South32 manganese ore export prices are an important signal for the wider manganese chain because China remains the largest global buyer of seaborne ore. When Chinese alloy plants slow purchases, overseas miners often need to adjust export offers to maintain sales momentum.

Chinese Alloy Weakness Cuts Restocking Appetite

Chinese importers have shown limited interest in restocking manganese ore because inventories remain sufficient and alloy prices are weakening. This has reduced spot buying urgency before the Labour Day holiday on 1-5 May.

Many alloy plants postponed ore feedstock purchases while waiting for clearer market direction after the holiday. This cautious behaviour has weakened the negotiating position of overseas ore suppliers.

The pressure is also visible in Chinese port prices. Australian 44-46% lumpy manganese ore fell to 43-47 yuan/mtu delivery ex quay on 28 April, down from 47-50 yuan/mtu on 31 March.

The decline shows that domestic buyers are not only resisting new import offers. They are also repricing available port material lower as downstream demand fails to improve.

Manganese ore demand is closely linked to ferro-manganese and silico-manganese production. These alloys are used in steelmaking, where manganese improves strength, deoxidation and performance.

When steel consumption slows, alloy plants reduce purchasing activity. This immediately affects ore demand because manganese alloy producers are the main consumers of imported ore.

Steel Demand Remains the Main Constraint

The deeper issue is weak steel demand in China. Slower economic growth and subdued construction activity have limited recovery in steel consumption, leaving alloy producers cautious about raw material buying.

Without a stronger steel recovery, manganese alloy prices are likely to remain under pressure. This limits the ability of alloy plants to pay higher ore prices, even when miners try to defend margins.

South32’s price cut also reflects wider seaborne competition. Mining firms outside China need to respond when Chinese buyers have enough stock and are unwilling to chase cargoes.

Australian high-grade lumpy ore usually commands stronger interest because of its quality and processing value. However, even higher-grade material can weaken when alloy margins are poor and port inventories are sufficient.

South African ore also remains exposed to Chinese demand swings. Lower-grade material can face sharper price pressure when buyers reduce procurement and focus only on immediate needs.

For the manganese market, the June price cut suggests that miners are prioritising volume discipline and customer access over holding elevated offers. The next price direction will depend on whether Chinese alloy plants return after the holiday with real restocking demand.

If steel demand remains weak, manganese ore prices could face further downside pressure. If alloy prices stabilise and inventories fall, importers may resume buying, but recovery is likely to be gradual.

The Metalnomist Commentary

South32’s price cut shows that the manganese market is being driven by demand absorption, not supply shortage. Until Chinese steel and alloy demand improves, seaborne manganese ore suppliers will remain exposed to cautious restocking and lower port prices.

EU Steel Demand 2026 Shows Only Modest Recovery as Excess Capacity Grows

EU steelmaking

EU steel demand 2026 is expected to recover only modestly, with the OECD forecasting a 1.4% increase across the EU and UK to 153.65mn t. The improvement follows a 1.2% decline in 2025 and falls well short of a meaningful rebound.

EU steel demand 2026 will remain constrained by high energy costs, weak downstream manufacturing and persistent import pressure. Steel production across the EU and UK is forecast at 132.4mn t after falling by 2.4% last year.

EU steel demand 2026 also faces a wider structural problem. Global steel demand remains weak while excess production capacity continues to grow, increasing pressure on prices and trade flows.

New European import measures may provide some support to regional mills, but trade protection alone is unlikely to restore demand without stronger industrial activity.

Europe Remains Trapped Between Weak Demand and Import Pressure

Germany illustrates the depth of the challenge. Steel demand is expected to rise by only 1.1% in 2026 after falling by 6.1% last year.

Weak domestic consumption and high import volumes continue to affect German competitiveness. High electricity and energy costs add further pressure to steelmakers already facing weak utilisation.

France shows an even weaker recovery profile. Demand is expected to increase by just 0.3% after dropping by 12.6% in 2025.

This means European mills may receive some pricing support from tighter import controls without seeing equivalent growth in physical consumption.

That distinction matters. Trade measures can improve domestic market protection, but they cannot replace demand from automotive, construction, machinery and other major steel-consuming sectors.

The risk is that mills face a market where imports are restricted but end-user consumption remains weak. In that environment, production discipline and cost competitiveness become increasingly important.

Global Overcapacity Shifts Growth Toward India and Emerging Markets

Global steel demand is forecast to increase by only 0.4% to 1.812bn t in 2026 after declining by 2.6% last year.

China remains the main drag, with demand expected to fall by 0.6%. In contrast, India is forecast to grow by 6.7%, while Asean steel demand is expected to rise by 3.5%.

Africa is projected to deliver the strongest regional growth at 4.4%. Middle East demand growth is expected to slow sharply to 1.6% from 6.4% because of regional conflict.

Trade flows are also becoming more complex. The OECD warned that some Chinese steel affected by trade restrictions is increasingly moving through third countries before reaching OECD markets.

Chinese semi-finished steel exports to southeast Asia increased by 300% in 2025. Some of that material can be converted into rolled products and subsequently exported into other markets.

Hot-rolled plate and wide coil have shown some of the largest shifts. This makes origin tracking and anti-circumvention measures increasingly important for steel policy.

The longer-term problem is capacity. Global excess steel capacity is projected to increase from 640mn t in 2025 to 745mn t by 2028.

Traditional blast furnace production also remains dominant. Global blast furnace pig iron output stood near 1.3bn t in 2024, roughly ten times direct reduced iron production, with China accounting for around 70% of global blast furnace output.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s steel problem is increasingly structural rather than cyclical. Import controls may protect prices, but without lower energy costs and stronger downstream manufacturing, excess global capacity will continue to pressure European mills.

HBIS Silico-Manganese Tender Prices Fall as China Steel Demand Weakens

Silico-Manganese

HBIS silico-manganese tender prices fell in April as weaker steel demand and higher spot alloy availability pressured China’s bulk alloy market. Hebei Iron and Steel cut its tender price for 65/17 grade silico-manganese to 6,300 yuan/t delivered and paid by acceptance bill.

The latest HBIS silico-manganese tender prices were down by 250 yuan/t from the previous tender. The state-owned steel producer increased April purchase volumes to 8,500t, up by 3,400t from its previous buying round.

HBIS silico-manganese tender prices are closely watched because they help set the tone for China’s manganese alloy market. The lower tender confirms that steel mills are using weak downstream demand and larger spot availability to push procurement costs lower.

The cut also reflects pressure from rising steel inventories. China Iron and Steel Association members held 18.63mn t of steel inventories as of 20 April, up 6.4% from early April and 12% from a year earlier.

Oversupply Weighs on Alloy Prices Despite Higher Tender Volumes

China’s domestic 65/17 silico-manganese alloy prices fell to 6,000-6,150 yuan/t ex-works on 23 April. This was down from 6,100-6,300 yuan/t on 9 April.

The price decline reflects continued oversupply in the market. Higher inventory pressure has limited the ability of alloy producers to defend prices, even when some steel demand shows signs of recovery.

HBIS’ higher purchase volumes gave the market some support, but not enough to reverse price direction. Buyers remain cautious because steel inventories are still elevated and construction demand has not yet fully recovered.

Some market participants are more optimistic about the steel outlook. Construction and infrastructure demand are expected to resume gradually, while domestic and seaborne steel demand improved in mid-April.

Chinese steel mills also lifted production slightly during that period. If steel output continues to rise, silico-manganese consumption could improve because the alloy is widely used in steel deoxidation and strengthening.

However, the recovery remains uneven. The higher HBIS buying volume suggests some restocking need, but the lower price shows that mills still hold negotiating power.

Ore Costs and Output Curbs Limit Downside Pressure

Many silico-manganese plants kept firm offers despite weaker spot prices. Higher manganese ore feedstock costs continue to support producer cost floors.

Output curbs at several large alloy producers in north China also helped limit deeper declines. Reduced production can help balance supply if demand recovers, but current inventory pressure remains the larger problem.

The market is therefore caught between two opposing forces. Weak steel demand and alloy oversupply are pushing prices lower, while ore costs and production curbs are preventing a sharper collapse.

This tension is typical of bulk alloy markets. Producers cannot easily cut prices below cost for long, but buyers can delay purchases when inventories are high and demand is uncertain.

For steelmakers, lower silico-manganese tender prices provide some cost relief. For alloy producers, the main challenge is preserving margins while feedstock prices remain firm.

The next market signal will come from whether steel demand improves enough to absorb alloy inventories. Without clearer consumption growth, manganese alloy prices may remain under pressure even if ore costs stay elevated.

The Metalnomist Commentary

HBIS’ tender cut shows that China’s silico-manganese market is still demand-led, despite higher ore costs. A real recovery will require stronger steel consumption and inventory drawdowns, not only higher tender volumes.

US Steel Tariffs and Chinese Oversupply Risk

NIPPON STEEL

Japan’s mills warn US steel tariffs and Chinese oversupply risk will worsen global imbalances. They expect weaker demand and thinner margins. As a result, US steel tariffs and Chinese oversupply risk could squeeze autos and machinery. Nippon Steel and JFE both flag profit and volume pressure. Therefore, US steel tariffs and Chinese oversupply risk now dominate boardroom planning.

Japan’s producers brace for weaker demand and profit hits

Nippon Steel projects a ¥50bn operating profit hit from tariffs and oversupply. The firm will cut crude steel output to 17mn t in April–September. It will also reduce export exposure to 40pc over six months. Meanwhile, JFE calls US tariffs the “biggest risk” to domestic demand. Both companies cite China’s slowdown and export push as key threats.

Autos and machinery face sharper headwinds under new trade frictions

Auto demand may weaken as tariffs raise costs and unsettle supply chains. Construction machinery demand could drop because 30pc of output ships to the US. High borrowing costs already depress equipment orders in Europe and Asia. Japanese service centers may delay restocking amid uncertainty. Inventory discipline will likely persist through fiscal 2025–26.

Global steel oversupply risk is rising as China redirects material. Tariffs could channel more Chinese exports into third markets. That shift pressures prices and spreads in Asia and the Middle East. Japan’s mills prepare for longer lead times on price recovery. Policy clarity and coordinated trade frameworks would stabilize flows sooner.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Japanese steel now faces a two-front challenge: a soft China and tariff reshuffles. Expect tighter product mix management and higher value-add focus to defend margins. Watch autos and yellow goods; any demand stabilization there could cap downside in H2.

European Ferro-Molybdenum Prices Hit Three-Year High on Concentrate Squeeze

Ferro-Molybdenum

European ferro-molybdenum prices have climbed to a three-year high as tight molybdenum concentrate supply, stronger Chinese steel demand and logistical constraints push the market higher. The rally has lifted prices sharply since the start of the year.

European ferro-molybdenum prices were last assessed at $70.90-71.50/kg in-warehouse Rotterdam on 19 May, up by about 25% from the start of the year. Molybdenum oxide prices also rose to $30.50-30.80/lb duty unpaid Rotterdam, up by 28% over the same period.

European ferro-molybdenum prices are being driven mainly by raw material tightness rather than a broad recovery in European steel demand. Molybdenum concentrate availability has tightened structurally, limiting oxide and ferro-molybdenum production flexibility.

The key problem is that molybdenum is mostly produced as a by-product of copper mining. That means supply cannot quickly respond to higher prices, leaving the market exposed when concentrate availability tightens or downstream demand rises.

Concentrate Tightness Drives the Molybdenum Chain Higher

Molybdenum concentrate is the starting point for the supply chain. It is converted into molybdenum oxide, which then feeds ferro-molybdenum production for alloy steel and stainless steel applications.

Concentrate prices in China have risen by about 29% since January, peaking at 5,235 yuan/mtu on 13 May. That cost increase has moved through the value chain and supported higher oxide and ferro-molybdenum prices.

Chinese steel demand has intensified the squeeze. Mills purchased around 30,000t of ferro-molybdenum in March-April, up 10% from a year earlier.

This buying absorbed much of China’s available spot concentrate and oxide supply. As a result, less material has been available for export to other consuming regions.

Market participants initially expected demand to slow after pre-holiday buying ahead of the 1-5 May Labour Day holiday. Instead, sustained steel mill demand kept buyers active and tightened availability further.

The Centerra Gold Langeloth outage in the US also supported the rally. An explosion near the facility’s acid unit on 29 January led to a suspension of operations, removing an important source of molybdenum oxide and ferro-molybdenum from the prompt market.

The facility’s direct global supply share is limited. However, its outage tightened nearby availability and strengthened bullish sentiment, allowing traders and producers to raise offers more aggressively.

Supply Constraints Outweigh European Demand Recovery

The current rally is largely supply-led. European steel demand has not recovered strongly enough to explain the scale of the price increase on its own.

Logistical constraints have made the situation worse. Financing, freight and inventory bottlenecks have reduced spot availability among trading firms.

Some sellers have also withheld material in expectation of further price gains. At the same time, buyers have resisted higher offers, reducing spot liquidity and creating sharper price movements.

Truckload enquiries have remained limited in recent weeks. This suggests that physical tightness and cautious seller behaviour are driving prices more than a surge in end-user consumption.

For alloy producers and steelmakers, the rally raises cost pressure. Ferro-molybdenum is used to improve strength, corrosion resistance and high-temperature performance in steels used across energy, chemicals, engineering, defence and industrial equipment.

The market’s vulnerability reflects molybdenum’s by-product nature. Even if prices rise sharply, copper mines cannot quickly increase molybdenum output just to meet alloy demand.

That makes the molybdenum chain highly sensitive to disruptions. Concentrate shortages, converter outages, Chinese buying and trading bottlenecks can all create price moves that exceed the underlying change in steel consumption.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The molybdenum rally shows how by-product metals can move violently when small supply disruptions meet concentrated demand. European buyers are not facing a simple steel-demand story; they are facing a raw material chain where concentrate availability now controls ferro-alloy pricing.

Canada extends Chinese metal tariff exemptions as supply chains realign

Canada, Mark Joseph Carney

Canada extends Chinese metal tariff exemptions by renewing relief on 66 steel and aluminum products. Canada extends Chinese metal tariff exemptions during Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Beijing visit. As a result, Ottawa signals a softer stance amid rising pressure from US trade policy.

Canada imposed 25% tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum in 2024 to shield domestic producers from global oversupply. However, manufacturers later flagged gaps in local availability for specific inputs. Therefore, Canada carved out exemptions for products it cannot source at scale.

What the 2026 exemption expansion covers

The updated list includes steel wire, stainless sheets and plates, and steel pipe and tube. It also includes aluminum alloy bars and rods, plus selected aluminum foil grades. Meanwhile, some exemptions appear company-specific, while others apply to all importers.

Canada widened the program for 2026 by extending the 66 exemptions and adding 13 more items. The government has not yet detailed the added products. Consequently, buyers may delay procurement decisions until final tariff guidance clarifies coverage.

Why the US factor is driving Canada’s trade posture

Canada’s steel sector has faced sustained strain since the US imposed 50% tariffs on steel imports in 2025. That shift pressured Canadian mills that rely on the US as a primary export outlet. Meanwhile, Canadian import demand for exempt products remained significant, rising from 2023 to 2024 before easing last year.

Canada extends Chinese metal tariff exemptions as it balances domestic protection with industrial continuity. The policy also aligns with a wider package that lowers tariffs for 49,000 Chinese EV imports. Therefore, metals and mobility now move together in Canada’s trade playbook.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This exemption framework looks like targeted de-risking, not a full policy reversal. However, it increases the need for transparent product definitions and compliance controls. The winners will be fabricators that secure inputs without reopening tariff uncertainty.

China's Major Steel Producers Cut Output in August

China's Steel

China's largest steel-producing provinces reported significant decreases in output during August, with Hebei province leading the drop at 18 percent. According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the five key provinces—Hebei, Jiangsu, Shandong, Liaoning, and Shanxi—collectively produced 40.3 million tons of steel in August. This represents a 13 percent decline from the previous year, accounting for 51.7 percent of the nation's total steel output for the month.

Hebei, the top steel producer in China, saw its output shrink to 14.89 million tons, an 18 percent decrease. Jiangsu's production fell by 12 percent, reaching 9.35 million tons. Shandong and Shanxi reported similar year-on-year declines of 12 and 13 percent, respectively, while Liaoning's steel output dropped marginally by 0.7 percent to 5.65 million tons.

The nationwide steel output also followed the downward trend, declining by 10.4 percent compared to the same period last year. In the first eight months of 2024, China's steel production decreased by 3.3 percent, with the top five provinces experiencing a 5.6 percent reduction.

Steel Prices and Demand

Several factors contributed to this cutback in production, including falling steel prices and weak demand. Shanghai’s hot-rolled coil (HRC) ex-warehouse prices hit a seven-year low in August, dropping by 260 yuan per ton ($36.90) from the beginning to the end of the month. The decline in prices and the sluggish real estate market forced many steel mills to reduce production to clear out inventory based on old standards before the new national rebar standard takes effect in September.

However, experts expect Chinese steel mills to increase production in September after August's maintenance period, as demand is likely to recover from the summer slump.

EU Green Procurement Rules Face Industry Criticism Over Weak Steel and Fertilizer Demand

Hydrogen Europe

EU green procurement rules are drawing sharp criticism from Hydrogen Europe after leaked draft legislation reduced the proposed low-carbon steel requirement in public procurement to 25pc from an earlier 70pc. The industry group said the change weakens the demand signal needed to support green steel, hydrogen, and low-carbon industrial investment.

EU green procurement rules in the latest draft require steel used in buildings, infrastructure, and transport projects to include at least 25pc low-carbon steel by volume. Hydrogen Europe argues that this level is too low to create a bankable market for emerging producers such as Stegra, Hydnum Steel, Saarstahl, and Salzgitter.

The dispute highlights a central problem in Europe’s industrial transition. Producers are being asked to invest in low-carbon steel, hydrogen, and cleaner fertilizers, but public procurement rules may not create enough guaranteed demand to justify those investments.

Low-Carbon Steel Requirement Falls Short of Industry Expectations

The reduction from 70pc to 25pc changes the industrial meaning of the proposal. A higher procurement target would have created a stronger lead market for European green steel, giving producers clearer demand visibility and helping justify capital spending on hydrogen-based and low-emission production routes.

Hydrogen Europe said the current draft does little to improve competitiveness against Chinese steel and Russian fertilizer imports. This is important because European producers face higher energy costs, strict carbon rules, and heavy investment requirements, while import competition continues to pressure margins.

The Industrial Accelerator Act still recognizes energy-intensive sectors through greenhouse gas intensity classification systems. These include fertilizers, chemicals, rubber, paper, plastics, coke, refined petroleum products, cement, glass, steel, and aluminium. However, the draft does not set green public procurement requirements for most of these product groups.

Fertilizer Sector Waits for Stronger Demand Measures

The fertilizer sector appears to receive limited support in the current draft. Industry sources said the sector may need to wait for the Fertiliser Action Plan, expected in the second quarter, for more concrete demand-side measures.

Low-carbon fertilizers matter because they connect clean ammonia, hydrogen demand, agriculture, and food supply chains. However, procurement requirements are more politically complex because agriculture remains highly sensitive to cost increases and supply security concerns.

The final clean product procurement percentage will be negotiated over the next 12-18 months by the European parliament and EU member states. That process will determine whether EU green procurement rules become a serious industrial policy tool or remain a limited climate-labeling framework.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s problem is no longer only technology readiness; it is market creation. Without stronger demand rules for low-carbon steel, hydrogen, and fertilizers, the EU risks asking companies to invest in clean capacity without giving them a reliable customer base.

Mexico Steel Import Restrictions Tighten as Government Purges Foreign Suppliers

Mexico Steel

Over 1,000 Steel Suppliers Face Removal Amid Triangulation Concerns

Mexico steel import restrictions are intensifying as the government moves to purge 1,062 foreign suppliers from its official registry. The Ministry of Economy uncovered irregularities in over 47% of registered foreign steel firms, with many found to be non-existent or misrepresented. Authorities are conducting site inspections in six countries, including Malaysia.

Anti-Tariff Triangulation Drives Trade Crackdown

The move aims to prevent tariff circumvention practices, especially the rerouting of Chinese steel through Mexico to access the U.S. duty-free. Mexico steel import restrictions follow U.S. accusations of trade triangulation and recent tariff increases under former President Donald Trump. Despite exemptions under USMCA, Banco BASE estimates Mexico faces a 19.51% effective tariff rate on goods entering the U.S.

Domestic Steel Use to Rise in Energy Infrastructure

Mexico’s government is pushing for more domestic steel usage in national energy projects. The state utility CFE plans to increase the use of Mexican steel in transmission towers from 30% to 60% by 2030. However, limited domestic suppliers for turbines and generators remain a bottleneck. Engineers are consulting on integrating Mexican-made cable and steel into upcoming infrastructure.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Mexico’s regulatory push highlights a broader shift toward trade transparency and domestic industrial development. The steel sector will feel immediate impacts, but long-term resilience hinges on capacity-building within Mexico’s heavy equipment supply chain.

China Vanadium Prices Weaken as Supply Rises and Steel Demand Slows

China Vanadium

China vanadium prices are under renewed pressure as higher spot availability, weak alloy demand and softer steel mill tenders weigh on the market. Domestic 98% grade vanadium pentoxide flake prices fell to 82,000-87,000 yuan/t on 8 May, their lowest level since 20 April.

China vanadium prices began to soften in late April after alloy producers slowed purchases and cut procurement bids. Most ferro-vanadium producers lowered feedstock buying levels after steel mill tender prices came in below market expectations.

China vanadium prices are also being pressured by rising output. Domestic vanadium production reached 56,040t of vanadium pentoxide in January-April, up 7.6% from a year earlier.

The market is now facing a classic supply-demand imbalance. Higher vanadium flake and slag production has increased spot availability, while steel-sector demand remains weak and export outlets are slowing.

Higher Flake and Slag Output Increases Spot Availability

China’s vanadium supply increased because stronger earlier prices encouraged producers to lift output from vanadium-bearing steel slag. Vanadium-containing steel slag production rose to 49,320t in January-April, up 8% from a year earlier.

Higher flake prices in the first four months improved margins for slag-based production. Domestic 98% grade vanadium pentoxide flake averaged 80,812 yuan/t ex-works during January-April, up 9.5% from a year earlier.

New capacity has also added pressure. Qinhuangdao Baigong Steel started a 10,000 t/yr vanadium pentoxide flake production line in Hebei province in February.

This additional output arrived just as downstream buying slowed. Major flake suppliers had not finalised some contracts by 8 May, while some alloy producers were buying only limited volumes at lower cash prices.

The increase in spot availability has changed buyer behaviour. Alloy producers are no longer rushing to secure feedstock because they expect further price weakness.

That expectation can reinforce the decline. When buyers delay purchases, sellers face more pressure to reduce offers, especially when inventories rise and steel demand remains poor.

Weak Steel Tenders and Export Slowdown Limit Demand

Ferro-vanadium demand remains the main drag on the vanadium market. Domestic 50% grade ferro-vanadium prices fell to 93,000-94,000 yuan/t ex-works on 8 May, their lowest level since 1 April.

Steel mill tender prices also declined. Prices paid by steelmakers fell to 94,000-95,000 yuan/t delivered, including VAT and payable by acceptance bill, down from late-April levels.

Steelmakers are lowering bids because steel margins remain weak. This is especially important for vanadium because much of its demand comes from alloying in rebar and other steel products.

China’s rebar production fell to 29.54mn t in January-April, down 8.6% from a year earlier, as the real estate slowdown continued to reduce construction-related steel demand.

Steelmakers purchased an estimated 6,865t of vanadium alloys in April, down 17% from a year earlier. This confirms that weaker steel consumption is now feeding directly into lower vanadium alloy demand.

Export conditions are also turning less supportive. China’s vanadium flake exports are expected to decline in the coming months as international production increases.

Canadian producer Largo more than doubled vanadium pentoxide output in the first quarter to 2,616t, supported by higher-grade ore and steadier processing at its Brazilian mine. Russian producer Evraz also started a new 15,000 t/yr vanadium pentoxide flake plant in March and is expected to ramp up by June.

These additions reduce the need for some overseas buyers to rely on Chinese flake. That weakens a potential outlet for excess Chinese supply.

The near-term outlook remains soft. Unless steel mill tenders recover or vanadium exports improve, rising spot availability will likely keep pressure on vanadium pentoxide flake and ferro-vanadium prices.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China’s vanadium market is being hit by the wrong combination: rising supply, weak rebar output and cautious alloy buying. The longer-term battery storage story remains attractive, but near-term pricing still depends heavily on steel demand and feedstock discipline.

SHFE Indonesian Nickel Cathode Brands Strengthen Indonesia’s Class I Nickel Role

The Shanghai Futures Exchange

SHFE Indonesian nickel cathode brands have gained a major credibility boost after the Shanghai Futures Exchange approved two Indonesian-produced nickel cathode brands for delivery against SHFE contracts. The approvals cover PTENICO from Eternal Nickel Industry and DX zwdx from CNGR Dingxing New Energy.

The approvals mark an important step in Indonesia’s move from nickel ore and intermediate products toward exchange-deliverable Class I nickel. Indonesia has already become the world’s dominant nickel processing hub, but exchange approval gives its refined metal greater financial-market recognition.

SHFE Indonesian nickel cathode brands also reinforce the role of Chinese-backed industrial parks in building Indonesia’s downstream nickel value chain. Both approved producers are linked to major Chinese groups with strong positions in stainless steel or battery materials.

The development matters because exchange-deliverable nickel sits at the intersection of physical supply, futures market liquidity and industrial procurement. Approval by SHFE gives the brands wider acceptance among Chinese market participants and strengthens Indonesia’s role in Class I nickel trade.

Tsingshan and CNGR Extend Indonesia’s Refined Nickel Platform

Eternal Nickel Industry’s PTENICO brand was approved by SHFE after previously being listed on the London Metal Exchange on 16 December 2025. The company is a subsidiary of Chinese stainless steel producer Tsingshan Holding Group.

The plant is located in the Weda Bay Industrial Park in Halmahera, North Maluku. It uses an electrolytic process and has 50,000 t/yr of nickel cathode capacity, with nickel content of 99.96%.

Tsingshan’s involvement is strategically important. The group transformed global nickel markets through Indonesian nickel pig iron and stainless steel expansion, and it is now extending that influence into refined Class I nickel.

CNGR Dingxing New Energy’s DX zwdx brand was also approved by SHFE. The plant is located at the Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park and also uses an electrolytic process. It has 50,000 t/yr of nickel cathode capacity, with nickel content of 99.96%.

CNGR Dingxing is a subsidiary of CNGR, a major Chinese lithium-ion battery cathode active material precursor producer. This gives the brand a direct connection to battery materials supply chains, not only stainless steel demand.

The LME accepted CNGR Dingxing’s Indonesian nickel cathode brand in May 2024. It also approved cobalt cathode produced by CNGR in Qinzhou, Guangxi, in March, showing the company’s expanding exchange-approved metals footprint.

Together, PTENICO and DX zwdx represent 100,000 t/yr of Indonesian nickel cathode capacity. Their SHFE approval gives Indonesia a stronger position in futures-linked refined nickel supply.

Exchange Approval Changes Nickel Market Positioning

The two brands are the first Indonesian-produced nickel cathodes approved by SHFE for delivery. That is significant because Indonesia’s nickel rise was initially built around ore, nickel pig iron, ferronickel, matte and mixed hydroxide precipitate.

Exchange-deliverable cathode is a different market category. It requires tighter quality control, brand recognition and acceptance by financial and physical market users.

SHFE has approved Chinese-produced nickel cathode brands totalling 121,000 t since 2024. Adding Indonesian brands expands the pool of deliverable material and shows how Indonesia is being integrated into China’s nickel pricing and delivery system.

This could gradually influence nickel market structure. More deliverable Indonesian metal may improve flexibility for Chinese buyers, increase acceptable supply for futures settlement and strengthen the link between Indonesian production and Chinese exchange pricing.

The approvals also come during a period of Class I nickel oversupply. LME and SHFE inventories have risen as new refined nickel capacity has entered the market faster than demand growth from batteries and alloys.

Against that backdrop, brand approval can become a competitive advantage. Producers with exchange-deliverable status may have better access to financing, trade channels and customers that require recognised specifications.

For Indonesia, the approval supports a broader industrial policy objective. The country wants to capture more value from its nickel resources by moving beyond raw ore and intermediate exports into higher-value metal and battery materials.

For China, the approvals deepen supply-chain integration with Indonesian assets. Chinese companies are not only investing in Indonesian mines and smelters; they are building exchange-recognised refined metal capacity that can serve Chinese industrial and financial markets.

The Metalnomist Commentary

SHFE approval of Indonesian nickel cathode brands confirms that Indonesia is moving deeper into Class I nickel, not only bulk stainless and battery intermediates. The strategic issue now is whether this new exchange-deliverable capacity strengthens market liquidity or adds further pressure to an already oversupplied refined nickel market.

JSL Stainless Steel Sales Rise as Indian Demand Offsets Trade Pressure

JSL stainless steel

JSL stainless steel sales increased in the 2025-26 financial year as strong domestic demand supported broader adoption across infrastructure, mobility, defence and industrial sectors. Indian producer Jindal Stainless sold 2.5mn t of stainless steel during the year to 31 March, up 8% from 2.3mn t a year earlier.

JSL stainless steel sales were driven mainly by India’s internal market. Domestic sales accounted for 92% of annual volumes, showing that the company is prioritising local demand while global trade conditions remain uncertain.

JSL stainless steel sales dipped slightly in January-March to 641,743t from 649,857t in the previous quarter. The company attributed the decline partly to energy-related constraints linked to geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East.

The result highlights India’s growing role as a stainless steel demand centre. Consumption is expanding beyond conventional industrial uses into electric vehicles, trailers, containers, real estate, defence, aerospace and infrastructure.

Domestic Demand Anchors Volume Growth

Indian stainless steel demand remained the main growth engine for JSL. Government-backed infrastructure programmes and rising preference for longer-life materials supported consumption across multiple end-use sectors.

Stainless steel is gaining ground where durability, corrosion resistance and lifecycle cost matter. This is particularly relevant for coastal infrastructure, transport equipment, public works, defence systems and industrial applications.

Electric vehicles and trailers are also becoming more important. These sectors use stainless steel for strength, corrosion resistance and long-term reliability in components exposed to demanding operating conditions.

JSL’s domestic focus gives it some insulation from weak or volatile export markets. A strong home market allows the company to keep capacity utilisation higher while managing margin pressure from global competition.

The company is also preparing for further growth. JSL plans to increase annual melt capacity to 4.2mn t during the current financial year ending 31 March 2027.

That expansion will strengthen its position in India’s stainless market. However, the company will need sustained domestic demand growth to absorb the additional capacity without weakening prices.

Imports and Energy Costs Shape Competitive Risk

JSL continues to face pressure from Chinese-origin and Vietnamese stainless steel imports. The company warned that substandard material is allegedly being rerouted through ASEAN countries, raising concerns about trade circumvention and domestic input quality.

This issue matters because import pressure can undermine local producers even when domestic demand is healthy. Low-priced or poor-quality imports can distort pricing, weaken margins and create risks for downstream users.

Trade defence therefore remains important for India’s stainless steel industry. Domestic producers need fair competition if they are expected to invest in higher-value capacity and support national manufacturing goals.

Energy costs are another risk. JSL said geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East affected sourcing of propane, LPG and natural gas used in stainless steel manufacturing.

This shows how stainless steel production remains exposed to energy supply chains. Even when demand is strong, fuel availability and cost can affect output, margins and quarterly shipment performance.

Exports remained steady despite geopolitical conflicts and tariff uncertainty. JSL is building its presence in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Germany, supported by its value-added product portfolio.

This export strategy is important because value-added stainless products can help protect margins. Higher-specification products are less exposed to commodity price competition and more dependent on quality, qualification and customer relationships.

The Metalnomist Commentary

JSL’s performance shows that India’s stainless steel market is becoming a domestic demand story rather than an export-led one. The company’s next challenge is to defend quality and margins as imports, energy volatility and capacity expansion reshape competition.

Eurofer Downgrades 2024 Steel Consumption Forecast Amid Geopolitical Tensions and Market Challenges

Eurofer

The European steel industry faces ongoing turbulence as Eurofer, the European Steel Association, has downgraded its 2024 steel consumption forecast. Instead of the previously expected 1.4% recovery, Eurofer now predicts a 1.8% contraction in apparent steel consumption for the year. This revision follows a combination of escalating geopolitical tensions, rising energy costs, and the continuation of a downtrend observed in recent quarters.

Revised Forecasts and Industry Outlook

Eurofer has also adjusted its forecast for the output of steel-using sectors, now anticipating a decline of 2.7%, down from the previously expected 1.6%. Despite these declines, the forecast for 2024 is less severe compared to last year, when apparent steel consumption fell by 6%. Looking ahead to 2025, Eurofer projects a 3.8% recovery in apparent consumption and a 1.6% increase in output from steel-using sectors. However, this expected rebound comes after consecutive annual declines, indicating that it reflects more of a recovery from a period of stagnation rather than a genuine improvement in demand.

Sector-Specific Challenges

Several key sectors that typically drive steel demand in Europe are facing significant headwinds. The automotive industry, a major consumer of flat steel, is grappling with the aggressive pricing strategies of Chinese automakers, particularly in the electric vehicle (EV) sector. This competitive pressure has led Volkswagen, one of Europe’s largest car manufacturers, to announce the closure of at least three plants and lay off thousands of employees in Germany.

The challenges are not limited to the automotive sector. In the construction industry, a lack of investment, high production costs, and financing constraints are negatively impacting steel demand. Similarly, the white goods sector is also struggling with high production costs, which are expected to worsen once the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) comes into effect in 2026. While the CBAM will not fully cover downstream industries like white goods at first, its eventual extension is expected to raise steel prices within the EU, potentially affecting European white goods' competitiveness, particularly against imports from China.

Looking Ahead: Steel Consumption in 2025

Despite the setbacks in 2024, Eurofer remains cautiously optimistic about 2025, projecting a modest recovery. However, the road to recovery is complicated by external pressures, including geopolitical tensions and global market shifts. The full impact of the CBAM, combined with ongoing challenges in key industries like automotive and construction, will likely continue to shape the steel market in Europe over the coming years.

Chinese Aluminium Investment Shifts Focus to Overseas Production Facilities

Chinese Aluminium

Chinese aluminium investment is pivoting toward international markets as domestic production approaches government-imposed capacity limits. China produced 43.4 million tonnes of aluminium in 2024 and already possesses capacity to reach the government's production cap of 45 million tonnes per year. Therefore, any new Chinese aluminium investment will concentrate on facilities outside China rather than expanding domestic capacity.

Production Growth Slows in China While Global Expansion Accelerates

China's aluminium production growth will decelerate dramatically to approximately 0.4% compound annual growth rate over the medium term. This represents a significant shift from China's previous rapid expansion that outpaced global competitors. Meanwhile, Chinese aluminium investment will target strategic locations including Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Angola for new production facilities.

Indonesia emerges as the primary beneficiary of Chinese aluminium investment, with approximately 3 million tonnes of new annual capacity expected. The country has transformed from a bauxite supplier to China into a downstream aluminium producer. As a result, Indonesia's aluminium industry will receive substantial Chinese capital and technology transfer.

Secondary Aluminium Production Expands Despite Scrap Supply Constraints

Chinese secondary aluminium production will reach almost 30 million tonnes per year in 2025, doubling from 15 million tonnes five years ago. However, tight scrap supply continues to limit capacity utilization rates below 50% across the industry. This constraint affects the efficiency of Chinese aluminium investment in recycling infrastructure.

Ron Knapp, advisor to China Hongqiao Group chairman, emphasized that the production cap remains firm government policy. The cap prevents overcapacity issues similar to those experienced in China's steel industry. Therefore, Chinese companies must pursue aluminium investment opportunities in international markets to maintain growth trajectories.

Chinese aluminium demand growth will also moderate significantly in coming years. Primary aluminium consumption will increase by just 0.9% in 2025, falling to approximately 0.6% thereafter. Consequently, Chinese aluminium investment strategy focuses on securing global market share rather than serving domestic demand alone.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This strategic pivot reflects China's maturing aluminium sector and government commitment to sustainable industrial development through production caps. The shift toward overseas Chinese aluminium investment, particularly in resource-rich countries like Indonesia, will reshape global aluminium supply chains and create new competitive dynamics in international markets.