Appalachian Lithium Reserves Could Strengthen US Domestic Supply Security

USGS

Appalachian lithium reserves could give the US a much larger domestic resource base than previously recognised, according to a new assessment from the US Geological Survey. The agency said the eastern US Appalachian region may contain enough undiscovered, economically recoverable lithium to replace 328 years of US imports at 2025 levels.

Appalachian lithium reserves are hosted in pegmatites, large-grained rocks similar to granite. The southern Appalachian region is estimated to contain 1.43mn t of lithium oxide, while the northern Appalachian region holds another 0.90mn t.

Appalachian lithium reserves matter because the US still depends heavily on imported lithium. The country has only one current lithium producer and relied on imports for more than half of its supply in 2025.

The assessment adds another possible domestic supply route alongside lithium brine projects in the Smackover formation. Together, these resources could reshape US lithium strategy if they can be converted into permitted, economic and commercially scalable projects.

Pegmatite Resources Add a Hard-Rock Lithium Option

The Appalachian assessment points to hard-rock lithium potential in the eastern US. Pegmatite-hosted lithium is different from brine-based production because it usually requires mining, concentration and chemical conversion.

This gives the US another possible supply pathway. Hard-rock projects can produce spodumene concentrate, which can then be converted into lithium chemicals for batteries, energy storage and industrial uses.

Albemarle is already planning a lithium concentrator facility at Kings Mountain, North Carolina. The project is designed to produce 420,000 t/yr of lithium concentrate from spodumene.

That project is important because it could help rebuild a US hard-rock lithium supply chain. Domestic spodumene production would reduce reliance on foreign raw material and support future US conversion capacity.

However, resource estimates alone do not guarantee supply. Appalachian lithium projects would still need exploration, permitting, mine development, processing investment, environmental approvals and downstream customer qualification.

The strategic significance is still clear. The US lithium conversation is expanding beyond Nevada brines and western projects into eastern hard-rock resources with long-term supply potential.

Smackover Brines and Appalachian Pegmatites Broaden US Lithium Strategy

The Appalachian estimate follows earlier USGS work on the Smackover formation in southwest Arkansas. In 2024, the agency assessed that Smackover brines contain 5mn-19mn t of lithium, although it did not define economically recoverable volumes.

Several companies, including Equinor, ExxonMobil, EnergyX and Standard Lithium, are developing lithium projects in the Smackover region. Some are targeting commercial output around 2027.

The Smackover and Appalachian resource bases are strategically different but complementary. Smackover projects depend on brine extraction and processing technologies, while Appalachian projects would likely depend on hard-rock mining and spodumene concentration.

This diversification matters for US supply security. A lithium strategy based on multiple geological sources is more resilient than one dependent on a single basin, technology or company.

The US will still need processing capacity. Mining lithium ore or extracting lithium from brine does not automatically create battery-grade lithium carbonate or hydroxide.

That midstream gap remains the critical issue. Domestic resources must be connected to refining, chemical conversion, permitting, infrastructure and offtake agreements before they can reduce import dependence.

For battery manufacturers, the Appalachian assessment offers a long-term signal. More domestic resource potential could support future supply chains for electric vehicles, grid storage and defence-related battery applications.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Appalachian lithium assessment is a resource-security signal, not an immediate supply solution. The US has the geology, but the decisive bottleneck will be converting resources into permitted mines, concentrators and battery-grade lithium chemicals.

Chevron Joins the US Lithium Hunt

Chevron US lithium

Oil Majors Target Lithium in Smackover Formation

Chevron has officially entered the US lithium sector, joining ExxonMobil and Equinor in exploring lithium-rich brines in the Smackover formation. The oil giant acquired about 125,000 net acres in northeast Texas and southwest Arkansas, where high lithium content in briny groundwater has already attracted major interest.

The company plans to leverage its subsurface expertise to extract lithium from brine, aiming for lower costs and reduced environmental impact compared with hard rock mining or evaporation ponds. Chevron says this effort aligns with its broader strategy to support US energy leadership and build resilient domestic lithium supply chains.

Expanding Lithium Supply Amid Energy Transition

Chevron’s move mirrors a growing trend of oil companies pivoting toward critical minerals to secure positions in the energy transition. Smackover Lithium, a joint venture between Standard Lithium and Equinor, has already announced plans to produce 22,500 t/yr of lithium carbonate by 2028. Meanwhile, ExxonMobil signed a deal in November 2024 to supply up to 100,000 t of lithium carbonate to South Korea’s LG Chem, also sourced from the Smackover formation.

As demand for EV batteries accelerates, the region could become a cornerstone of the US lithium industry. Chevron’s participation underscores the convergence of oil and mining sectors, with traditional hydrocarbon firms now competing in battery materials.

Strategic Implications for US Lithium Supply

Chevron’s lithium strategy emphasizes domestic production to reduce reliance on imports and strengthen critical mineral supply chains. By applying oilfield brine extraction techniques, the company hopes to commercialize lithium with fewer environmental trade-offs.

Industry analysts believe oil companies could soon rival established lithium producers. As independent analyst Joe Lowry noted, “By early next decade, big oil and big mining will replace the likes of Albemarle at the top of the lithium world.”

The Metalnomist Commentary

Chevron’s entry into the lithium market highlights a strategic realignment of oil majors toward critical minerals. The Smackover formation is fast becoming a global lithium hotspot, and Chevron’s move strengthens US ambitions for secure, domestic supply. If successful, this strategy could reshape the balance of power in the lithium industry, positioning oil giants as major players in the battery supply chain.

Smackover Lithium Phase 1 Approval Clears Path for U.S. Brine-Based Lithium Expansion

Smackover Lithium

The Smackover Lithium Phase 1 approval marks a major milestone for U.S. lithium production, as Arkansas regulators greenlight the company’s brine extraction plans. The Smackover Lithium Phase 1 approval allows the joint venture to begin developing its Reynolds brine unit as part of a broader strategy to scale domestic battery-grade lithium output.

Phase 1 Targets 22,500 t/yr from Reynolds Brine Unit

The Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission (AGOC) approved the establishment of a lithium brine production unit at the South West Arkansas (SWA) project. The Reynolds unit spans 20,854 acres and is set to produce 22,500 tonnes per year of battery-grade lithium carbonate. Full-scale Phase 1 production is targeted for 2028.

Smackover Lithium is a joint venture between U.S.-based Standard Lithium and Norwegian energy firm Equinor. The project is based in Lafayette and Columbia Counties and will be developed in two equal phases, ultimately reaching 45,000 tonnes per year.

U.S. DOE Grant Faces Political Uncertainty

The company received a $225 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy in January 2025. However, this funding was placed on hold due to a presidential executive order issued by Donald Trump just days later, freezing clean energy funding programs.

Despite the uncertainty surrounding federal financing, Equinor and Standard Lithium remain committed to moving the project forward. Allison Kennedy Thurmond, Equinor’s VP of U.S. Lithium, emphasized ongoing collaboration with regulators and community stakeholders to secure a competitive royalty framework.

Direct Lithium Extraction at the Center of U.S. Supply Strategy

The Smackover project utilizes direct lithium extraction (DLE) technology, which offers a lower environmental footprint compared to traditional mining. As the U.S. seeks to localize battery supply chains, DLE projects like Smackover are gaining strategic importance.

Smackover’s Phase 1 approval places it among the leading North American lithium ventures, helping diversify global supply away from China-dominated sources and aligning with broader clean energy security goals.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Smackover Lithium Phase 1 approval highlights the regulatory momentum behind U.S. lithium projects despite political headwinds. As federal funding remains uncertain, private and state-level partnerships will play an increasingly critical role in scaling brine-based lithium production.

Pure Lithium Secures $300mn EXIM Support for US-Based Lithium Metal Battery Facility

Pure Lithium Corporation

Pure Lithium has received a $300 million Letter of Interest (LOI) from the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM) to support its planned industrial-scale lithium metal battery plant. If approved, the Pure Lithium EXIM loan would fall under EXIM’s “Make More in America” initiative aimed at rebuilding domestic manufacturing capacity and securing supply chains in strategic sectors like energy storage.

The proposed facility will use Pure Lithium’s proprietary “Brine to Battery” process, which directly converts brine into lithium metal anodes—eliminating graphite, cobalt, nickel, and manganese. This vertically integrated method enables a fully US-based battery supply chain, from raw material extraction to cell production. CEO Emilie Bodoin emphasized the project's potential to reshape global lithium battery sourcing models.

Disruptive Battery Chemistry Supports Strategic US Objectives

The Pure Lithium EXIM loan could accelerate commercialization of lithium metal vanadium oxide batteries, which offer higher energy density without relying on traditional cathode materials. This technology positions Pure Lithium at the forefront of post-Li-ion battery innovation, directly supporting the U.S. push for clean tech self-reliance.

Pure Lithium’s partnerships reinforce its vertically integrated vision. It sources lithium concentrate from E3 Lithium in Alberta, Canada, and collaborates with Saint-Gobain Ceramics to engineer water-blocking lithium-selective membranes—a key component in its novel extraction process.

EXIM Financing to Boost US Battery Supply Chain Resilience

EXIM’s Make More in America strategy supports projects that improve domestic industrial competitiveness in sectors facing global strategic risk. The Pure Lithium EXIM loan would directly address U.S. concerns over dependence on foreign-dominated battery material supply chains, especially China.

If finalized, the funding will catalyze Pure Lithium’s ability to scale manufacturing within U.S. borders while lowering barriers for next-generation battery adoption. This aligns with U.S. energy security goals and rising demand for alternative battery chemistries in defense, mobility, and grid storage sectors.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Pure Lithium EXIM loan represents a critical step in reshoring advanced battery manufacturing. As supply chain risks intensify and lithium metal demand grows, projects that fuse innovation with domestic sourcing will shape the next era of U.S. battery independence.

US Tariffs May Spur Argentina Lithium Salts Production

US Tariffs

Tariff Exemptions Favor Lithium Raw Materials, Not Finished Batteries

The US has exempted lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide from its newly announced tariffs, creating a possible boon for Argentina's lithium sector. While raw lithium salts escape extra duties, finished battery imports face steep tariffs: 64.9% for China, 24% for Japan, and 25% for South Korea.

This disparity aligns with US efforts to localize battery manufacturing, a movement accelerated by the Inflation Reduction Act under President Biden. With at least 10 new battery factories coming online in the US this year, the demand for lithium raw materials is surging.

Argentina’s Brine Lithium May Fill the US Supply Gap

The US faces a bottleneck in domestic lithium production and processing. Currently, Albemarle’s Silver Peak mine is the only active operation, producing just 5,000t/yr of technical-grade lithium carbonate, which lacks the purity needed for EV batteries.

As a result, the US will increasingly depend on lithium imports, especially battery-grade salts. Argentina, with its low-cost brine operations, may become a preferred supplier if its projects can consistently meet battery-grade specifications.

Brine operations, while slower to ramp up than hard-rock mining, are cheaper to operate and typically more cost-competitive over time. Argentina also offers a low 3% royalty tax, compared to Chile's 40% ceiling, enhancing its competitiveness.

Global Lithium Supply Chains May Shift Toward South America

Countries like Australia and Brazil, which mine spodumene, rely heavily on China for conversion, placing them in a higher tariff category. These spodumene-dependent nations now face at least 20% US tariffs due to their reliance on Chinese refining infrastructure.

Meanwhile, Argentina’s direct-to-battery-grade production strategy may give it an edge.

“All of Argentina’s lithium projects go to battery grade,” said Daniel Gonzalez, Argentina’s vice-minister of energy and mining.

If Argentina proves its capability at scale, the country could secure a dominant role in North America's clean energy transition, especially as the US reorients trade relationships in critical minerals.

The Metalnomist Commentary

With tariffs redrawing global battery supply lines, Argentina’s brine-based lithium sector is now a strategic wildcard. If proven at scale, it could shift market share away from spodumene producers tied to China—and bring Latin America deeper into the heart of US industrial planning.

Brazil Critical Minerals Deals With US Highlight Rare Earths and Lithium Strategy

Brazil Critical Minerals Deals

Brazil critical minerals deals with the US are gaining momentum as Goias and Minas Gerais move to deepen cooperation on rare earths, lithium, and other strategic minerals. The two neighboring states hold some of Brazil’s most important mineral reserves and are trying to position themselves inside the global critical minerals supply chain.

Goias has signed a preliminary agreement with the US to support cooperation around rare earth reserve development. Minas Gerais is also preparing a similar agreement focused on lithium and other critical minerals.

Brazil critical minerals deals at the state level are not legally binding and do not grant exploration rights. However, they can support research, technical training, environmental licensing coordination, and tax incentives for foreign companies.

Goias and Minas Gerais Push Beyond Raw Mineral Exports

Goias is seeking to use US cooperation to improve mineral mapping, technical capability, and project development. The state wants to move beyond raw mineral exports and build stronger capacity around higher-value mineral development.

This ambition matters because Brazil has major resource potential but remains cautious about becoming only a supplier of unprocessed critical minerals. Rare earths, lithium, and other strategic materials carry far greater industrial value when linked to processing, refining, separation, and downstream manufacturing.

Minas Gerais adds another strategic layer because it holds Brazil’s largest lithium reserves. Together, Goias and Minas Gerais could become important partners for the US as Washington looks to diversify supply chains away from China-dominated critical mineral processing.

State-Level Diplomacy Pressures Brazil’s Federal Strategy

Brazil critical minerals deals with individual states also carry political weight. Goias and Minas Gerais are led by governors more aligned with the Trump administration than Brazil’s federal government, creating a possible pressure point in national trade negotiations.

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has resisted any agreement that does not include commitments to develop processing and refining capacity inside Brazil. That position reflects a wider industrial policy concern: Brazil wants mineral value creation, not only mineral extraction.

The US has already signed critical minerals agreements with several Latin American countries, including lithium producers Chile, Bolivia, and Argentina, as well as copper-rich Ecuador and Peru. Brazil remains a tougher negotiator because it has the resource base, market size, and political incentive to demand more domestic value addition.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Brazil critical minerals deals show that resource diplomacy is moving from national capitals to state governments. The central question is whether Brazil can turn US interest into processing, refining, and industrial capacity rather than another raw-material export cycle.

ABTC’s Tonopah Flats Lithium Project Secures $900mn EXIM Backing

American Battery Technology Company

Strategic Funding to Accelerate U.S. Lithium Refining Capacity

The Tonopah Flats Lithium Project may receive $900 million in federal support to bolster U.S. lithium supply chains. American Battery Technology Company (ABTC) announced that it received a Letter of Interest (LOI) from the U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM), supporting the development of a domestic lithium mine and refinery in Nevada. The proposed facility would produce 30,000 metric tonnes per year of battery-grade lithium hydroxide, a key material for EV and energy storage systems.

Federal Executive Order Boosts Critical Mineral Projects

The EXIM LOI aligns with the March 2025 Executive Order aimed at fast-tracking domestic mineral production. Under this order, agencies like EXIM are directed to prioritize permits, funding, and offtake support for projects vital to U.S. defense and energy security. The Tonopah Flats Lithium Project fits these criteria by offering a scalable, local source of lithium using advanced leaching processes for sedimentary claystone resources.

ABTC Advances with Proven Technology and Industrial Partnerships

ABTC has already proven its lithium extraction technology at pilot scale and is now scaling up with help from engineering partner Black & Veatch. Together, they are working on the commercial refinery’s design and construction, ensuring the Tonopah Flats Lithium Project meets both industrial and regulatory benchmarks for U.S.-based lithium supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This funding milestone places ABTC at the forefront of America’s lithium independence strategy. The Tonopah Flats Lithium Project exemplifies how federal coordination and innovative extraction technology can reduce reliance on foreign lithium sources.

Galan Secures Lithium Offtake Deal to Supply US Partner

Galan Lithium

Authium Signs Long-Term Agreement for Lithium Chloride from Argentina

Galan Lithium has signed a binding lithium offtake agreement with US-based Authium to support the development of Galan’s Hombre Muerto West (HMW) lithium brine project in Argentina. The agreement covers the purchase of 45,000 metric tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) in lithium chloride form over six to twelve years. This move positions Galan to become a key supplier to US battery material processors.

Authium will provide a $6 million offtake prepayment, ensuring supply security for its lithium carbonate plant in the United States. Meanwhile, Galan’s HMW project will ramp up in phases to achieve a production capacity of 60,000t/yr of LCE, reinforcing Argentina’s role in global lithium supply chains.

Galan Targets LFP Battery Market with Lithium Chloride Strategy

Galan produces lithium chloride concentrate, aligning with rising demand from lithium converters. As lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery technology gains adoption, chloride-based feedstock is increasingly favored for conversion flexibility and cost. Therefore, Galan's chloride strategy supports downstream decarbonization and expands optionality for global cathode manufacturers.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This agreement reflects the growing vertical integration between upstream brine producers and downstream processors in the US. Galan’s strategic shift toward chloride aligns well with LFP market trends, highlighting Argentina’s expanding role in lithium geopolitics.

US Chile Critical Minerals Talks Signal New Supply Chain Reset

US Chile Critical Minerals

US Chile critical minerals cooperation is moving onto a formal diplomatic track after the two countries signed a joint declaration to begin discussions on critical minerals and rare earths. The agreement was signed in Santiago during a meeting between Chilean president José Antonio Kast and US deputy secretary of state Christopher Landau.

US Chile critical minerals talks will focus on mechanisms to strengthen supply chains for strategic raw materials. Chile’s foreign affairs ministry said technical teams will examine projects of interest, scrap management for critical minerals and rare earths, and public-private financing mechanisms.

US Chile critical minerals cooperation carries direct industrial importance because Chile is one of the world’s most important resource economies. The country is the largest global copper producer and the third-largest lithium producer, while its large lithium reserves remain underdeveloped because of long-standing legal restrictions.

Chile’s Copper and Lithium Base Gives the Talks Strategic Weight

Chile’s mineral position gives the US a clear reason to rebuild cooperation. Copper is central to power grids, electrification, data centers, renewable energy, industrial equipment, and defense systems. Lithium remains essential for batteries, energy storage, and electric vehicles.

The new talks also include rare earths and scrap management. That broader scope suggests the discussions are not limited to mining projects. They may also cover recycling, secondary raw materials, processing routes, and financing structures that can support a more resilient supply chain.

Chile’s untapped lithium potential is especially important. The country has the world’s largest lithium reserves, but development has been constrained by legacy laws and policy limits. If cooperation creates more investable project structures, Chile could become a more active pillar in allied battery material supply.

US Policy Shift Reopens a Critical Minerals Channel With Chile

The declaration also marks a reset in US-Chile relations after a tense period under former president Gabriel Boric. Washington had moved ahead with critical minerals partnerships with other allies earlier this year, but Chile was not included in the initial initiative.

That omission made Chile’s absence notable. Any serious Western critical minerals strategy is difficult to build without Chile because of its copper and lithium position. The new declaration therefore signals a practical return to resource diplomacy.

For Chile, the discussions could open access to financing, technology, and downstream partnerships. For the US, they offer a pathway to reduce exposure to concentrated supply chains and secure materials needed for industrial competitiveness, energy security, and defense resilience.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The US cannot build a credible critical minerals strategy without Chile. The key question is whether this declaration becomes a real project-financing framework or remains another diplomatic signal without industrial execution.

Lithium Americas to Start Thacker Pass Build in May 2025

Lithium Americas to Start Thacker

Lithium Americas confirms Thacker Pass construction start in May, targeting production by late 2027 to boost U.S. lithium supply.

Thacker Pass Lithium Project Set for Major Construction Phase

Lithium Americas (LAC) will begin major construction at its Thacker Pass project in Nevada starting May 2025. The company aims to reach initial production by late 2027, reinforcing its role in North America's lithium supply chain. Engineering progress has already reached 55% and is expected to exceed 90% design completion by year-end.

LAC’s CEO Jonathan Evans emphasized the readiness to move forward after securing funding and partnerships. “Once we declare final investment decision, our team will focus on execution,” Evans said. This milestone follows the finalization of a $2.26 billion Department of Energy (DOE) loan in October 2024.

Funding and Strategy Behind the U.S. Lithium Push

In March 2025, LAC received a $250 million investment from Orion Resource Partners to support Phase 1 development. The DOE loan—secured under the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program—will help build processing infrastructure. Meanwhile, LAC reported a $42.6 million net loss in 2024, up from $5.1 million in 2023, mainly from DOE and GM deal costs.

The Thacker Pass project is one of the most advanced lithium developments in the United States. Its strategic importance has grown amid increasing global demand for EV battery-grade lithium. The project also marks a significant step toward U.S. efforts to reduce reliance on imported lithium, especially from China.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Thacker Pass isn't just a mining project—it’s a cornerstone of U.S. energy security policy. As governments and automakers race toward EV adoption, domestic lithium supply is becoming as critical as oil once was. The Metalnomist will be watching closely as Lithium Americas enters this pivotal execution phase.

Chile’s Value-Added Lithium Strategy Faces Setbacks Despite New Tender

Albemarle

Preferential pricing fails to attract long-term downstream lithium investments

Chile's value-added lithium strategy continues to struggle, as the country launches a new tender targeting downstream lithium manufacturing. Despite offering preferential prices through U.S.-based Albemarle’s supply, past efforts to anchor lithium battery production in Chile have faltered due to investor withdrawal and bureaucratic hurdles.

Chinese companies exit amid weak market and contract uncertainty

On 30 April, Chile’s economic development agency Corfo issued a call for proposals to manufacture lithium-based products locally. The offer involves 9,599 tonnes/year of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) from Albemarle’s operations in the Atacama region, with volumes set to rise annually until the lease ends in 2043. However, Chinese firms BYD and Yongqing Technology—winners of a 2022 tender—recently exited the program, citing weak global lithium prices and the short remaining duration of SQM’s contract, which ends in 2030.

Bureaucracy and pricing formula disputes hinder industrialization

Government delays in allocating fiscal land for facilities and unresolved pricing methodology disputes have consistently derailed investment plans. Chile also failed to advance a 2018 initiative when three selected companies abandoned their projects due to disagreements over the preferential pricing mechanism. These repeated breakdowns raise concerns about the long-term viability of Chile's value-added lithium strategy.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Chile’s ambitions to move up the lithium value chain face structural and market barriers. Without streamlining regulatory procedures and securing long-term offtake confidence, the strategy risks remaining stuck at the raw material stage—even as global EV demand grows.

Canada and Ontario to Fund Frontier Lithium's Conversion Plant in Thunder Bay

Frontier Lithium's

New facility to boost domestic lithium salt output and shield Ontario’s critical mineral sector from U.S. trade pressures.

Frontier Lithium, a Canadian pre-production mining firm, announced that both the Ontario provincial government and the Government of Canada plan to financially support its upcoming lithium conversion facility in Thunder Bay.

While the exact investment amount has not been disclosed, the company said the combined support will cover a “significant portion” of capital expenditures required for the project. Once completed, the facility will produce approximately 20,000 metric tonnes per year of lithium salts derived from Frontier’s PAK lithium project.

Lithium Strategy Targets U.S. Tariffs with Domestic Processing

The announcement comes amid renewed trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada. This week, U.S. President Donald Trump reimposed tariffs on Canadian exports, placing pressure on Canada's critical minerals sector.

Vic Fedeli, Ontario’s Minister of Economic Development, stated that processing lithium at home is vital to counteract U.S. tariffs. “The frontline of our battle against Donald Trump’s tariffs starts in northern Ontario,” Fedeli emphasized, citing the province’s abundant supply of critical minerals as a key advantage.

Frontier’s Thunder Bay Project Supports North American Battery Supply Chain

The Thunder Bay facility is part of Canada’s broader strategy to strengthen domestic battery materials production and reduce reliance on foreign processing hubs. With this support, Frontier Lithium will advance its role in the North American EV and energy storage supply chain.

Although Frontier has not revealed total project costs, the backing from both levels of government positions the company to secure financing and accelerate construction timelines.

European Lithium Velta Acquisition Expands Titanium Exposure in Critical Minerals

Velta Holding

The European Lithium Velta acquisition marks a strategic shift beyond lithium into titanium. European Lithium agreed to fully acquire US-based Velta Holding through an all-scrip deal. The transaction will diversify its critical minerals portfolio and support titanium production plans. As a result, the European Lithium Velta acquisition broadens the company’s long-term industrial relevance.

The deal also preserves operational continuity at Velta. Chief executive Andriy Brodskyi and the existing management team will remain in place. Production processes and export contracts will also stay unchanged. Therefore, the European Lithium Velta acquisition appears designed to add capacity without disrupting current business.

The transaction value remains flexible, but the strategic logic is already clear. The implied value stands at about A$48.5mn-A$50.1mn based on recent share prices. European Lithium will transfer 173mn fully paid ordinary shares to Velta shareholders. Consequently, the deal gives European Lithium direct exposure to operating titanium assets and technical know-how.

Ukraine Titanium Assets Add Processing Depth and Strategic Optionality

Ukraine titanium assets are central to the appeal of this transaction. Funding will be directed toward stabilising operations at Velta’s Byrzulivske mining and processing complex. That support is important because asset reliability matters as much as resource ownership. Meanwhile, the company gains access to a working titanium platform rather than an early-stage concept.

Velta also brings a more advanced technology angle. The company has plans tied to a US titanium manufacturing site that would process ilmenite into titanium powder. That project would use Velta’s patented process and Ukrainian feedstock. Therefore, the European Lithium Velta acquisition adds both upstream resource exposure and downstream processing potential.

This matters for the wider critical minerals market. Titanium is increasingly relevant to aerospace, defence, additive manufacturing, and industrial applications. A company that combines lithium exposure with titanium capability can position itself more broadly in strategic materials. As a result, European Lithium may gain a more diversified investment narrative.

Titanium Production Plans Still Depend on Security and Execution

Titanium production plans now depend on more than corporate ambition. Any larger expansion in capacity or investment will remain tied to the security environment in Ukraine. That creates a clear execution risk for the acquired assets. However, it also means the upside could be meaningful if conditions stabilise.

The US angle adds another layer of strategic value. Velta previously received a letter of interest for $60mn from the Export-Import Bank of the United States. That support relates to development of a US titanium manufacturing site. Consequently, the European Lithium Velta acquisition could eventually support a more international titanium supply chain.

For European Lithium, this is a portfolio-shaping move rather than a simple asset purchase. The company is using Velta’s assets and technical capabilities to expand its reach in critical minerals. Meanwhile, it is doing so through a structure that avoids immediate cash strain. Therefore, the deal could prove important if management converts strategic optionality into operating progress.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This acquisition is notable because it links lithium strategy with titanium industrial capability. European Lithium is no longer presenting itself as a single-metal story. If execution holds and security risks ease, the company could emerge with a more credible role in the broader critical minerals chain.

US Shifts DRC Strategy in Play for Minerals

DRC Mining

Washington’s pivot to resource diplomacy marks renewed interest in African lithium and cobalt amid China rivalry

KoBold Eyes Lithium as US Reengages in the DRC

The US is renewing its focus on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), with minerals now central to diplomatic strategy. KoBold Metals, backed by Jeff Bezos, is in talks to acquire the Manono lithium project—America’s first major DRC investment since 2016. Meanwhile, the DRC offered the US access to mineral assets in return for help against the M23 insurgents in the northeast. As a result, the Manono mine, with 400mn tonnes at 1.65% lithium oxide, could become a strategic anchor for US battery supply chains.

Tshisekedi Looks to Trump, Presses for Security-Mineral Pact

President Felix Tshisekedi asked for US assistance during a recent Fox News interview, linking mineral rights to security support. He emphasized the need for American pressure and sanctions to suppress rebel groups threatening national stability. In return, the DRC hopes to forge a long-term economic and security partnership with Washington that echoes past Cold War-era ties.

US Seeks Leverage as China Dominates Cobalt Market

China owns 21 of 28 major cobalt mines in the DRC, including Tenke Fungurume and Kisanfu, the world’s largest cobalt producers. However, Beijing has shown reluctance to provide military aid, prompting Kinshasa to court U.S. engagement as a counterweight. Meanwhile, the U.S. has eased corruption compliance rules, possibly paving the way for broader business involvement in high-risk jurisdictions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

America’s mineral diplomacy in the DRC may redefine Africa’s geopolitical alignment. KoBold’s bid is more than a business move—it's a signal of strategic intent. Yet risks remain. Any minerals-for-security pact will demand clear red lines to avoid entanglement in regional conflict. The DRC’s mineral wealth is unmatched, but its volatility is equally unparalleled.

US Copper Flows Shift West as Washington Targets African Supply Chains

Copper

US copper flows are becoming a strategic policy priority as Washington seeks to redirect African copper away from China-oriented supply chains and into western manufacturing networks. The shift shows how copper is moving beyond its traditional role as an industrial commodity.

US policymakers are pursuing a dual strategy. They want to accelerate domestic copper projects and processing while also securing international copper sources that can feed US and allied supply chains faster.

The Democratic Republic of Congo has become central to this effort. The country offers high-quality resources and faster supply potential than many long-dated greenfield copper projects.

US copper flows are therefore being reshaped through offtake agreements, financing structures, infrastructure plans and strategic partnerships. The goal is to create secure mine-to-end-use supply chains that support American manufacturing and reduce dependence on China-linked material routes.

African Copper Becomes a Strategic Supply Target

The DRC’s copper output has historically moved east into Chinese-controlled or China-oriented value chains. Washington now wants to build alternative routes that connect African copper to the US and allied industrial base.

This is not only about copper cathode or concentrate volumes. It is about who controls logistics, financing, offtake, processing and final market access.

The US is already using state-backed financing and trading structures to compete for African copper and cobalt. The DRC, Zambia and Guinea are emerging as priority jurisdictions in this wider mineral strategy.

Glencore’s possible sale of a 40% stake in two DRC copper-cobalt mines to the US-backed Orion Critical Mineral Consortium shows how policy and capital are beginning to move together. More US interest is also emerging in Congolese copper-cobalt, manganese, gold and lithium assets.

This matters because China has built deep influence across African mining, processing and trading channels. Western buyers cannot change copper flows only by expressing demand. They need financing, infrastructure, political support and long-term offtake commitments.

The US strategy also reflects a broader recognition that copper supply security cannot rely only on domestic mines. US copper resources are substantial, including brownfield leach opportunities and idle stockpiles, but permitting remains a major constraint.

International supply partnerships can move faster than many US projects. That makes African copper strategically valuable as Washington tries to support manufacturing, grid expansion, defence supply chains and electrification.

Inventory Distortions Change Copper Market Economics

US copper flows are also being affected by tariff expectations and inventory shifts. Around 1.9mn-2mn t of copper metal inventory is now sitting globally, with roughly 1.2mn t located in the US.

That is an unusually high share because the US consumes about 2mn t/yr, while China consumes roughly 15mn t/yr. The result is a market where headline global stocks look large, but copper outside the US can feel much tighter.

This inventory concentration changes copper economics. The same copper unit can carry different value depending on location, policy exposure, tariff risk and available delivery route.

That marks a major shift from the older copper market model. Copper was once priced mainly around construction cycles, manufacturing demand and visible exchange stocks. It is now increasingly priced around jurisdiction, logistics and strategic access.

The CME-LME arbitrage has reopened to encourage flows into the US. This reflects how policy expectations can pull metal across regions even when global balances appear more comfortable.

Physical demand remains supportive. Chinese demand has stayed resilient, Yangshan premiums have strengthened, and Shanghai inventories have continued to draw. These signals suggest that the broader copper market remains tighter than simple stock numbers imply.

Copper’s role in grids, electrification and data centres has also changed how governments view the metal. Copper is now becoming a strategic asset for industrial policy, not only a material input for construction and manufacturing.

The biggest commercial opportunities may therefore shift from pure price arbitrage to control over flows. Traders, miners and governments will increasingly compete through logistics, financing, offtake and jurisdictional positioning.

US copper flows will remain central to that competition. The race is no longer only about producing more copper. It is about deciding where copper goes, who processes it and which industrial systems it supports.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Copper is becoming a policy metal because electrification has turned physical access into a strategic advantage. The next copper cycle will not be defined only by price, but by who controls African supply routes, financing and end-use allocation.

ABTC Accelerates Tonopah Flats Lithium Project to Boost US Battery Supply Chain

American Battery Technology Company(ABTC)

Advancing Lithium Resource Development in Nevada

American Battery Technology Company (ABTC) has launched a drill program to advance its Tonopah Flats Lithium Project (TFLP) in Big Smoky Valley, Nevada. The project holds an estimated 21.2 million metric tonnes of economically accessible lithium carbonate equivalent, positioning it as a key domestic lithium resource for the US battery industry.

The drilling initiative will support the prefeasibility study, providing geotechnical data to define the mine pit structure. Additionally, core samples will be collected for assay and characterization, further refining the lithium resource estimate. This program aims to expand TFLP's overall lithium potential, reinforcing its role in the North American EV supply chain.

On-Site Lithium Hydroxide Refinery to Lower Production Costs

ABTC plans to construct a lithium hydroxide refinery directly at the TFLP site, targeting a 30,000 t/yr production capacity. The company's production cost for battery-grade lithium hydroxide is projected at $4,302 per tonne, offering a cost-effective supply solution for electric vehicle (EV) and energy storage manufacturers.

With the US government prioritizing domestic lithium production, the TFLP project aligns with federal efforts to reduce reliance on foreign lithium imports. By accelerating development, ABTC strengthens Nevada’s position as a critical hub for battery minerals processing in the United States.

As lithium demand surges, ABTC's strategy to integrate mining and refining at Tonopah Flats could set a benchmark for sustainable lithium production while ensuring a stable supply chain for US battery manufacturers.

Ganfeng Launches Mariana Lithium Project, Expands Global Lithium Supply Chain

Ganfeng Lithium Project

China’s Ganfeng Accelerates Lithium Production Across Argentina, Mali, and China

Ganfeng Lithium has officially begun production at its Mariana lithium chloride plant in Argentina's Salta province, strengthening its global lithium supply network. The company launched operations on February 12, marking a significant milestone in its South American investment strategy.

The Mariana project’s first phase features an annual capacity of 20,000 tonnes of lithium chloride. Ganfeng plans to rapidly scale output upon phase completion. Its subsidiary, Litio Minera Argentina, owns 100% of the project, which holds a total lithium resource of 8.12 million tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).

Ganfeng Expands Global Lithium Footprint with Multi-Continent Strategy

Beyond Mariana, Ganfeng is aggressively scaling its global lithium production. In Argentina, the Cauchari-Olaroz project ramped up output from 6,000 tonnes in 2023 to 25,400 tonnes in 2024. The site targets 30,000–35,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate production in 2025. In Mali, the Goulamina spodumene mine began first-phase operations in December 2024.

In China, Ganfeng has established refining capacities totaling 50,000 t/yr for lithium carbonate and 100,000 t/yr for lithium hydroxide. The company opened a 45,000 t/yr lithium salts plant in Sichuan and launched initial production at a 25,000 t/yr lithium carbonate facility in Hunan’s Chenzhou city through its joint venture Hunan Anneng Ganfeng.

Chenzhou Mega Project Sets New Benchmark for Lithium Refining in China

Anneng Ganfeng plans to invest ¥7 billion (US$960 million) into a 150,000 t/yr lithium carbonate complex in Chenzhou. This project will roll out in three phases, with the initial 50,000 t/yr phase already under construction. These efforts solidify China’s position in downstream lithium conversion and reflect Ganfeng’s ambition to control the full value chain from resource to battery-grade materials.

Ganfeng’s total global resource investment now exceeds 79.59 million tonnes LCE. With assets in Argentina, Mali, China, Australia, Mexico, and Ireland, the firm remains a dominant force in both lithium brine and spodumene extraction.

Intrepid Potash Utah lithium project targets battery-grade lithium carbonate from brine

Intrepid Potash

Intrepid Potash Utah lithium project development is moving forward in Wendover with Aquatech and Adionics. Intrepid Potash Utah lithium project plans to convert lithium-bearing brine byproduct into battery-grade lithium carbonate. As a result, Intrepid Potash Utah lithium project strategy links fertilizer infrastructure with US critical minerals goals.

High extraction results strengthen the technical case

Intrepid Potash Utah lithium project testing achieved a 92.9% lithium extraction rate from brine byproduct. The process produced lithium chloride above 99.5% purity using Adionics’ system. Meanwhile, Aquatech validated conversion and refining into 99.5% battery-grade lithium carbonate.

These results matter because brine projects often fail at scale due to yield loss. However, high recovery and high purity reduce downstream reprocessing needs. Therefore, the project may deliver a simpler route to qualifying battery-grade material.

Infrastructure reuse could lower capex and execution risk

Intrepid Potash Utah lithium project positioning relies on existing Wendover potash assets and site logistics. The company argues that existing infrastructure differentiates it from greenfield lithium builds. As a result, the project can potentially shorten development cycles and reduce capital exposure.

Management also frames the move as a controlled expansion, not a pivot away from fertilizer. However, the company did not provide a detailed timeline for construction or commissioning. Therefore, near-term impact depends on how quickly partners translate pilot results into a bankable flowsheet.

Why this matters for US domestic lithium supply chains

Intrepid Potash Utah lithium project fits a growing trend of extracting lithium from industrial brines and byproducts. This approach can diversify supply beyond hard-rock imports and South American brines. Meanwhile, battery makers increasingly prioritize domestic, specification-grade carbonate for compliance and resilience.

The project’s main advantage is feedstock adjacency to an operating industrial site. However, commercialization will still hinge on throughput, reagent costs, and long-run brine consistency. Therefore, investors will watch for pilot-to-commercial scale milestones and offtake alignment.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This project looks like a pragmatic byproduct-to-critical-mineral upgrade, not a speculative lithium land-grab. However, the absence of a firm timeline suggests the partners still need to de-risk scale-up. The winners in DLE will be the teams that prove stable operations, not just lab-grade purity.

Albemarle Shifts Strategy: Chengdu Site to Care and Maintenance, Focus on Lithium Carbonate

Albemarle

US lithium producer Albemarle is making significant operational changes in its strategy. The company announced that its Chengdu site in China will be placed into care and maintenance (C&M), and it will shift a portion of its Qinzhou production from lithium hydroxide to lithium carbonate. These moves reflect Albemarle's ongoing efforts to adjust its production processes amid a challenging financial year.

Financial Losses and Restructuring Measures

Albemarle reported a significant financial loss of $1.2 billion for 2024, a stark contrast to the $1.6 billion profit the company posted in 2023. This loss includes restructuring charges and asset write-offs. The company is focusing on reducing operational costs to improve its financial position in the coming years.

Despite the financial setback, Albemarle achieved notable growth in its lithium sales. The company sold 203,000 metric tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) in 2024, marking a 26% increase compared to the previous year. The company expects a modest sales volume increase of 0-10% in 2025.

Strategic Shift in Production and Cost Optimization

In line with its restructuring efforts, Albemarle plans to reduce its capital expenditure (capex) by $100 million, bringing the total capex for 2025 to between $700 million and $800 million. This follows a reduction of more than $450 million in capex during 2024. Albemarle's shift from lithium hydroxide to lithium carbonate production in Qinzhou is part of its strategy to optimize its production network.

Approximately 50% of Albemarle's energy storage products are sold through long-term contracts that are indexed and typically last for 2-5 years. These contracts include price floors and a 3-month price lag, helping the company maintain stability in an uncertain market.

Kent Masters, Albemarle's Chairman and CEO, stated, “We are taking decisive actions to reduce costs, optimize our conversion network, and increase efficiencies to preserve our long-term competitive position.”

US Tariffs on Chinese Lithium-Ion Batteries Set to Reach 82.4%

Chinese Lithium-Ion Batteries

New Tariff Policy to Significantly Impact the EV Battery Market

US President Donald Trump’s recent tariff policies will result in a substantial increase in the import tariff on batteries from China, with lithium-ion batteries facing a sharp rise to 82.4%. This change, effective April 5, 2025, is set to impact the importation of both electric vehicle (EV) and non-EV lithium-ion batteries, a move likely to affect various industries reliant on these energy storage systems.

The Impact of the 82.4% Tariff on Lithium-Ion Batteries

The new tariff structure applies a 34% reciprocal tariff on Chinese imports, pushing the total tariff on lithium-ion EV batteries to 82.4%. Non-EV batteries will face a lower, but still substantial, tariff of 64.9% until January 2026, when it will rise to 82.4%. The new rates will affect not only the electric vehicle industry but also energy storage and consumer electronics, which rely heavily on lithium-ion battery technology.

This sharp tariff increase is a part of broader trade policies aimed at countering China’s trade practices, and it will likely influence the cost of batteries across multiple sectors, leading to higher prices for consumers and manufacturers alike.

Additional Tariffs and the Section 301 Plan

The 82.4% tariff on lithium-ion batteries includes several layers of duties already in place. These include the existing 3.4% duty imposed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, as well as two separate 10% tariffs on Chinese products implemented since Trump’s administration began. Moreover, current Section 301 tariffs on lithium-ion EV batteries are set at 25%, while non-EV batteries are taxed at 7.5%. These tariffs are part of the broader US strategy to address concerns about intellectual property and trade imbalances.

The Biden administration's plan to raise the Section 301 tariff on non-EV batteries to 25% by January 2026 reflects the long-term trade policy direction for China-US relations.