Volkswagen Osnabruck Plant Could Shift to Defence Use as EV Transition Slows

Volkswagen

Volkswagen Osnabruck plant may be repurposed for defence manufacturing after vehicle production ends in 2027, highlighting how weaker-than-expected electric vehicle demand is reshaping Germany’s automotive industrial base.

Volkswagen Osnabruck plant is already scheduled to stop car production under the company’s wider restructuring plan. Volkswagen is now discussing possible future use of the site with defence companies as it seeks to retain jobs and utilise existing industrial capacity.

Volkswagen Osnabruck plant currently produces the T-Roc Cabrio, a niche combustion-engine model. Its limited role in Volkswagen’s future EV portfolio has made the facility more vulnerable as the group reduces domestic manufacturing capacity.

The potential shift toward defence also reflects a broader change in European industry. Automotive companies are increasingly examining alternative uses for factories that no longer fit slower and less predictable electrification plans.

EV Weakness Forces Volkswagen to Rationalise German Capacity

Volkswagen is reducing roughly 40% of its domestic production capacity by 2028 as it restructures its German operations.

The company has already closed or repurposed other facilities and is moving models between plants to reduce costs and improve utilisation.

Weak utilisation has become a central problem across Europe’s automotive sector. EV manufacturing capacity expanded rapidly based on expectations of stronger demand, but sales growth has proved uneven across markets.

That has created a mismatch between factory capacity and actual vehicle demand. Carmakers are responding through production pauses, model transfers, workforce reductions and plant closures.

Volkswagen’s decision to halt ID.4 production in the US also illustrates the uncertainty surrounding EV demand outside Europe.

For suppliers, lower vehicle production can affect demand for aluminium, copper, electrical steel, battery materials and automotive-grade specialty metals.

The restructuring therefore reaches beyond vehicle assembly. Capacity changes at major automakers can ripple through entire regional manufacturing and materials supply chains.

Defence Manufacturing Offers Alternative Use for Industrial Assets

Repurposing Osnabruck for defence could allow Volkswagen to preserve skilled labour, manufacturing infrastructure and regional industrial activity after passenger vehicle production ends.

Automotive plants already possess many capabilities relevant to defence manufacturing, including metal fabrication, machining, welding, coating, assembly and quality control.

However, defence production requires different certifications, security requirements and product qualifications, meaning conversion would not be immediate.

The strategic logic is still strong. European governments are increasing defence spending while automotive manufacturers face underused capacity.

This creates an opportunity to redirect factories toward sectors with stronger demand and government-backed procurement.

For Germany, the shift could also help preserve industrial employment while supporting domestic defence manufacturing capacity.

The broader implication is that Europe’s industrial transition may become more diversified than originally expected. Instead of moving directly from combustion vehicles to EVs, some manufacturing assets may migrate into defence, aerospace and other strategic sectors.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Volkswagen’s Osnabruck review shows that Europe’s industrial transition is no longer only about electrification. As EV demand disappoints, defence and other strategic industries may become alternative destinations for underused automotive manufacturing capacity.

ChargeScape Rivian Partnership Brings Large EV Batteries Into Grid Services

ChargeScape

ChargeScape Rivian partnership will connect Rivian electric vehicles to utility-managed charging programmes, turning large EV batteries into flexible grid assets that can help manage peak electricity demand.

ChargeScape Rivian partnership is strategically important because Rivian vehicles carry some of the largest battery packs in the US passenger EV market. Earlier R1 models offer capacity of up to 141kWh, while newer R2 models carry around 88kWh.

ChargeScape Rivian partnership also creates a newno revenue model for EV owners. Drivers participating in eligible programmes could earn as much as $3,000/yr by allowing utilities to manage charging or sell stored electricity back to the grid during periods of high demand.

The agreement strengthens the convergence between transportation and electricity infrastructure, creating a distributed energy storage network without requiring utilities to build every battery themselves.

Large EV Batteries Become Flexible Grid Assets

Vehicle-grid integration allows utilities to shift EV charging away from peak periods and, where bidirectional charging is available, draw electricity from vehicle batteries when the grid needs additional supply.

This turns parked EVs into distributed storage assets rather than passive electricity consumers.

Rivian's large battery packs make the economics particularly interesting. A single 141kWh vehicle contains significantly more storage than many residential battery systems, creating substantial flexibility when thousands of vehicles participate together.

Utilities can use this capacity to reduce peak demand, absorb excess renewable generation and improve grid stability.

For EV owners, managed charging creates an opportunity to monetise battery capacity while vehicles are parked. The financial value depends on electricity prices, utility programme rules, battery availability and the frequency of grid participation.

ChargeScape already connects automakers with utilities including DTE, Silicon Valley Power and Xcel Energy. Its automotive shareholders include BMW, Ford, Honda and Nissan.

The platform says its existing partnerships provide access to more than 5mn EVs across the US and Canada, giving it the potential to aggregate substantial distributed battery capacity.

Vehicle-to-Grid Growth Could Reshape Battery Economics

The expansion of vehicle-grid integration changes the economic role of EV batteries. Battery packs can generate value not only through transportation but also through electricity markets.

At sufficient scale, connected vehicles can operate similarly to a virtual power plant, combining thousands of distributed batteries into one controllable resource.

This could reduce the need for some dedicated stationary storage while increasing the utilisation of batteries already manufactured for vehicles.

The model also strengthens demand for sophisticated battery management systems, power electronics, bidirectional chargers and grid software.

For battery materials, the impact is more complex. Greater economic value per battery could improve EV ownership economics and support vehicle adoption, strengthening long-term demand for lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and other materials.

At the same time, better utilisation of existing batteries can increase the amount of energy storage available to grids without requiring an equivalent increase in standalone battery installations.

The ChargeScape-Rivian partnership therefore represents a broader shift toward integrating transportation batteries directly into electricity infrastructure.

The Metalnomist Commentary

EV batteries are evolving from transportation components into grid infrastructure. If vehicle-to-grid programmes scale, automakers and utilities could unlock gigawatt-hours of distributed storage without building entirely separate battery fleets.

Colorado Battery Recycling Law Sets Mandatory Lithium Recovery Targets

Colorado Battery Recycling

Colorado battery recycling law introduces mandatory recovery targets for lithium, nickel and cobalt from electric and hybrid vehicle batteries. The measure creates a more structured framework for recovering critical minerals from end-of-life batteries.

Colorado battery recycling law requires recyclers to recover 50% of lithium from spent batteries by 2031 and 80% by 2035. Nickel and cobalt recovery must reach 90% by 2031.

Colorado battery recycling law will also prohibit landfilling of EV batteries from July 2029. This should push more used packs toward reuse, dismantling and materials recovery.

The legislation strengthens the commercial case for domestic battery recycling by creating clearer collection obligations and long-term recovery requirements.

Mandatory Recovery Targets Support Secondary Battery Materials

The Battery Stewardship Act requires battery stewardship organizations to submit plans covering collection, transportation, processing and recycling.

The lithium target is particularly important because recovering lithium economically has historically been more challenging than recovering nickel and cobalt.

A 50% recovery requirement by 2031 gives recyclers time to improve process efficiency before the threshold rises to 80% in 2035.

The 90% recovery requirement for nickel and cobalt sets an even higher standard. Both metals remain valuable inputs for several lithium-ion battery chemistries.

Recovering these materials can reduce dependence on newly mined supply and create more domestic secondary feedstock for battery manufacturers.

The landfill ban reinforces that objective by keeping valuable battery materials inside the industrial supply chain.

Producer Fees Could Improve Battery Collection and Recycling Economics

Battery providers will fund part of the system through fees linked to their share of battery vehicles registered in Colorado.

An initial programme fee will support implementation. Annual payments beginning by July 2030 will cover administration, enforcement and regulatory costs.

This shifts more responsibility for end-of-life batteries toward companies placing battery vehicles into the market.

The framework could also improve feedstock certainty for recyclers. Reliable access to spent batteries remains one of the biggest challenges facing the emerging US battpery recycling industry.

Over time, the legislation may encourage better pack design for dismantling, reuse and materials recovery.

If similar policies spread to other states, US battery recycling could develop around mandatory recovery standards rather than voluntary collection alone.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Colorado is turning battery recycling into a regulated critical minerals supply chain. The most important benefit may be feedstock certainty, because recyclers need predictable battery volumes as much as better recovery technology.

GM Redwood Battery Storage Project Extends EV Battery Value Chain

BESS

GM Redwood battery storage project will deploy repurposed electric vehicle battery packs at a General Motors plant in Michigan, extending the useful life of batteries before final recycling.

GM Redwood battery storage project will combine 100 reused EV battery packs into a 1.5MW/7.2MWh battery energy storage system. The installation will provide dispatchable power and help reduce electricity costs at the manufacturing site.

GM Redwood battery storage project is significant because it connects battery manufacturing, vehicle use, second-life energy storage and materials recovery within one supply chain. Redwood estimates the system will save more than $3mn in electricity costs over its operating life.

The project also shows how retired EV batteries can remain economically valuable even after they no longer meet automotive performance requirements.

Second-Life Batteries Add Value Before Recycling

EV batteries typically retain significant usable capacity when they are removed from vehicles. That remaining energy storage capability can support stationary applications where weight and space are less restrictive than in automotive use.

Repurposing packs for BESS applications can therefore delay recycling while extracting additional economic value from the battery.

For industrial facilities, storage systems can help manage peak electricity demand, provide backup power and shift energy consumption toward lower-cost periods.

The Michigan installation gives GM a direct opportunity to reduce plant electricity costs using batteries already linked to its own vehicle ecosystem.

This model also reduces the need for newly manufactured cells in some stationary storage applications. That can lower incremental demand for lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and other battery materials.

However, second-life systems still require testing, battery management and safety controls because used packs can have different degradation histories and performance characteristics.

Redwood Builds Closed-Loop Battery Supply Chain With GM

Redwood's relationship with GM extends across multiple stages of the battery lifecycle. The recycler handles manufacturing scrap, end-of-life EV packs and now second-life energy storage deployment.

Redwood has already received more than 28,000t of material from GM, with another 10,000 EV battery packs expected to enter the pipeline.

The company also works with Ultium Cells, GM's joint venture with LG Energy Solution, to recycle battery production scrap from facilities in Ohio and Tennessee.

This creates a more integrated materials loop. Manufacturing scrap can return quickly to recycling, while vehicle batteries can first enter stationary storage before eventually being processed for material recovery.

The approach could become increasingly important as EV battery volumes grow. Recycling alone captures raw materials, but second-life deployment can add another revenue stage before final recovery.

For automakers, that can improve battery economics while strengthening access to recycled lithium, nickel, cobalt and copper over the longer term.

The Metalnomist Commentary

GM and Redwood are showing that the battery circular economy does not begin with recycling. Second-life storage can create an additional commercial stage between vehicle use and materials recovery, improving both battery economics and supply-chain efficiency.

Cobre Panama Copper Mine Moves Closer to Government Decision

Panama, copper mine

Cobre Panama copper mine could move closer to a restart after Panama's president Jose Raul Mulino formed a ministerial committee to determine the future of the shuttered operation. The move gives the government a formal process for assessing one of the country's most economically significant industrial assets.

Cobre Panama copper mine has been closed since the end of 2023, when Panama's supreme court ruled its operating licence unconstitutional. The shutdown removed a major source of copper from the global market and sharply reduced First Quantum Minerals' production base.

Cobre Panama copper mine produced 331,000t of copper in 2023, equal to around 1.5% of global output. The operation also contributed roughly 5% of Panama's economic output, making its future important for both the domestic economy and international copper supply.

Mulino has previously supported reopening the mine and described the issue as a state mission. However, political, environmental and legal opposition remains strong, making any restart complex.

Government Committee Reflects Deep Political Divide

The new committee brings together three ministers with different views on the mine. Commerce minister Juan Molto, who supports reopening, will chair the group.

Environment minister Juan Carlos Navarro has argued against a restart, while finance minister Felipe Chapman has taken a more neutral position. The structure reflects the competing economic, environmental and fiscal considerations surrounding the project.

For Panama, the economic argument is significant. Cobre Panama generated substantial export earnings, employment and government revenue before its closure.

But the legal and social risks are equally important. The mine was shut after weeks of protests involving opposition groups, trade unions, environmental organisations and civil society groups.

Opponents criticised the terms granted to First Quantum and raised concerns about environmental damage. These issues mean that reopening cannot be treated as a simple operational decision.

Any restart will require a framework that addresses licensing, environmental oversight, fiscal terms and public confidence.

Restart Could Return Major Copper Supply to Global Market

For the copper market, Cobre Panama remains one of the largest idled assets capable of returning significant production.

Its 331,000t output in 2023 was large enough to influence global concentrate availability and First Quantum's financial performance. The mine accounted for around 40% of the company's annual revenue before closure.

First Quantum has improved the chances of renewed negotiations by dropping international arbitration against Panama, meeting a condition previously requested by the government.

The company has said it remains committed to dialogue on the mine's future. This removes one major obstacle, but it does not resolve the domestic political debate.

If the mine eventually restarts, it would add meaningful supply to a copper market increasingly shaped by grid investment, electrification, EV demand and data centre growth.

However, the timing remains uncertain. The government's decision will need to balance economic recovery with legal durability and environmental legitimacy.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Cobre Panama is one of the few major copper assets capable of returning large volumes without a full greenfield development cycle. The challenge is no longer geology or infrastructure, but whether Panama can create a political and legal framework strong enough to sustain a restart.

Texas LFP Plant Links Domestic Lithium Supply With Cathode Production

EnergyX

Texas LFP plant development is moving forward after Wildcat Discovery Technologies and EnergyX formed a joint venture to produce lithium iron phosphate cathode active material in Hooks. The project represents more than $230mn of investment and is designed for around 15,000 t/yr of CAM capacity.

Texas LFP plant plans are strategically important because the facility will sit next to EnergyX’s Lonestar lithium project in the Smackover formation. This creates a potential domestic route from lithium extraction and conversion to cathode material production.

Texas LFP plant supply will also benefit from a structured lithium pricing agreement. EnergyX will provide lithium carbonate to the joint venture at commercially favourable terms, including a market discount and price floor and ceiling intended to reduce exposure to lithium price volatility.

The project strengthens US efforts to localise more of the battery value chain, particularly for LFP chemistry used in electric vehicles and stationary energy storage.

Co-Location Reduces Battery Supply Chain Risk

The Hooks facility is designed to produce about 15,000 t/yr of LFP cathode active material, with potential for future expansion.

Its location beside EnergyX’s Lonestar lithium operation is the project’s main industrial advantage. Co-locating lithium supply and cathode production can reduce logistics complexity, shorten supply chains and improve feedstock security.

EnergyX plans to produce 48,500 t/yr of lithium hydroxide at Lonestar by 2030. The first phase is expected to reach 14,250 t/yr by 2028.

The project is targeting operating expenditure of about $3.85/kg, which could strengthen the economics of downstream battery material production if that cost structure is achieved at scale.

The joint venture will initially receive lithium carbonate under a pricing structure that limits exposure to extreme market movements. This gives the cathode operation greater cost visibility during periods of lithium volatility.

For battery materials projects, this kind of feedstock agreement can be as important as plant capacity. Cathode producers need reliable supply, predictable chemistry and manageable pricing to compete with established Asian producers.

LFP Growth Supports US Battery Localization

LFP chemistry is gaining market share because it offers lower cost, strong cycle life and improved thermal stability compared with nickel-rich cathode systems.

It also avoids nickel and cobalt, reducing exposure to two globally concentrated and price-sensitive battery metals. However, LFP still depends heavily on lithium supply and specialised cathode manufacturing capability.

The Wildcat-EnergyX project therefore addresses two major US supply-chain gaps at the same time: domestic lithium production and domestic cathode active material manufacturing.

Stationary energy storage is likely to be an important demand source. Large grid batteries increasingly favour LFP because of its durability, safety characteristics and lower material cost.

EV demand could provide another growth route, particularly as automakers expand lower-cost vehicle platforms using LFP cells.

The project also illustrates a wider shift in US battery strategy. Rather than building isolated mines or chemical plants, developers are increasingly trying to connect extraction, conversion and active material production within regional industrial clusters.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Wildcat-EnergyX venture is strategically stronger because it links lithium supply directly with LFP cathode production. US battery localization will depend less on individual plants and more on integrated regional chains that control feedstock, processing and pricing risk.

BYD EV Sales Recover in May as Export Demand Offsets China Weakness

BYD

BYD EV sales returned to year-on-year growth in May as surging overseas demand offset continued weakness in China. The company sold 383,453 new energy vehicles during the month, up 0.3% from a year earlier.

BYD EV sales had declined for consecutive months since October 2025 as domestic policy changes, weaker incentives and government pressure against aggressive price competition weighed on China’s automotive market.

BYD EV sales are now increasingly dependent on international markets. Exports jumped to 160,644 units in May from 89,047 a year earlier, showing how rapidly the company is building a global sales base.

The recovery also highlights a broader shift in China’s EV industry. Domestic competition remains intense, while manufacturers are increasingly using overseas markets to absorb expanding production capacity.

Exports Become BYD’s Main Growth Engine

BYD sold 376,990 passenger NEVs in May and another 6,463 commercial vehicles. Battery electric vehicle sales fell by 2.8% year on year to 198,674 units, while plug-in hybrid sales rose by 3.3% to 178,316 units.

The split shows that plug-in hybrids continue to play an important role in BYD’s product mix. PHEVs can appeal to buyers that want electrification without relying entirely on charging infrastructure.

China classifies battery electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids and fuel-cell vehicles as new energy vehicles. For battery material demand, however, the distinction matters because BEVs generally require larger battery packs than PHEVs.

BYD’s January-May NEV sales fell by 20% year on year to 1.4mn units. The decline followed government and industry efforts to reduce destructive price competition in China’s vehicle market.

The rollback of vehicle purchase tax incentives from 1 January also weakened domestic demand. At the same time, major automakers have committed to paying suppliers within 60 days to improve financial stability across the supply chain.

Exports are increasingly compensating for that pressure. Brazil has become one of BYD’s most important international markets and is now the largest destination for Chinese NEV exports.

Easing import restrictions in markets including Canada could provide additional export opportunities. This strengthens the case for Chinese automakers to continue expanding assembly, logistics and distribution networks overseas.

EV Export Growth Supports Battery Materials Demand

Higher oil prices have also improved the relative economics of electric vehicles. Rising crude prices since the escalation of Middle East tensions have increased operating costs for combustion-engine vehicles and strengthened EV competitiveness.

This can support demand for lithium, graphite, copper and other battery materials if EV exports continue to rise. However, the material impact will depend on the mix between BEVs and smaller-battery plug-in hybrids.

BYD’s shift also matters for the wider automotive metals market. Growing EV output supports copper demand through motors, wiring and power electronics, while alu

minium remains important for lightweight structures and battery enclosures.

The company has been fully committed to electrified vehicles since ending production of gasoline-only cars in March 2022. BYD sold 4.626mn NEVs in 2025, up 8.3% from the previous year.

The challenge now is geographic balance. Domestic growth is slowing, while overseas markets are becoming more important to utilisation rates and future production growth.

That shift could accelerate localisation outside China. As export volumes rise, BYD and other Chinese automakers may increasingly invest in overseas assembly and regional supply chains to manage tariffs, logistics and local-content rules.

The Metalnomist Commentary

BYD’s May recovery shows that China’s EV growth story is becoming increasingly export-driven. For battery metals, the key variable is no longer only Chinese vehicle sales, but how quickly Chinese manufacturers can convert overseas demand into sustained BEV and PHEV production growth.

EU Car Emissions Policy Divides States as 2035 and ETS 2 Battles Intensify

EU, ETS

EU car emissions policy is becoming a major fault line between member states as governments debate how much flexibility automakers should receive after 2035 and how quickly carbon pricing should expand into road transport and buildings.

France, Spain and Sweden defended continued electrification, while Poland called for greater flexibility in vehicle CO2 rules and further changes to ETS 2. The European Commission’s current proposal would replace the existing 100% tailpipe-emissions reduction requirement for new cars and vans from 2035 with a 90% reduction, with the remaining emissions compensated through low-carbon steel, e-fuels or biofuels. 

EU car emissions policy increasingly matters for metals markets because the regulatory outcome will influence the pace of EV adoption, internal-combustion vehicle production and material demand across batteries, copper, aluminium and automotive steels.

At the same time, disagreements over ETS 2 show that Europe is still negotiating how quickly consumers and transport markets should absorb the cost of decarbonisation.

2035 Flexibility Could Reshape Automotive Metals Demand

The Commission’s proposed flexibility would allow plug-in hybrids, range extenders, mild hybrids and some internal-combustion vehicles to remain in the market beyond 2035, provided manufacturers meet the wider emissions framework. 

That matters because the automotive material mix changes significantly depending on powertrain.

Battery electric vehicles typically require larger battery packs and more copper-intensive electrical systems. They directly support demand for lithium, graphite and selected nickel and manganese products depending on battery chemistry.

Hybrids require much smaller batteries, reducing battery mineral intensity per vehicle. However, they still consume more copper and electrical components than conventional combustion vehicles.

Continued ICE production would also sustain demand for metals and components linked to traditional powertrains, including speciality steels, aluminium castings and exhaust-system materials.

Low-carbon steel is becoming another strategic element. Under the Commission proposal, EU-made low-carbon steel could contribute to compensating the remaining emissions permitted after 2035. 

This could create a new commercial advantage for European steelmakers investing in lower-carbon production. Automotive decarbonisation would then depend not only on the vehicle powertrain but also on the embedded emissions of its materials.

The industrial argument is therefore becoming more complex than EV versus ICE. Europe is increasingly debating whether decarbonisation should be measured through tailpipe emissions alone or through a broader combination of powertrain, fuels and lower-carbon materials.

ETS 2 Debate Highlights Cost of Europe’s Transition

The political divide extends beyond cars to carbon pricing.

ETS 2 is designed to expand emissions trading to fuels used in buildings, road transport and additional sectors. Its full launch is currently scheduled for 2028, while EU institutions have also been strengthening its market stability reserve to reduce excessive price volatility. 

Poland is pushing for stronger mechanisms to control carbon prices and has argued for further flexibility around implementation.

The issue is important because ETS 2 could eventually increase the carbon cost associated with road fuels and heating. Governments are therefore balancing emissions objectives against household costs, inflation and industrial competitiveness.

For metals and manufacturing, carbon market design has indirect but significant consequences. Faster electrification supports grids, charging infrastructure and electrical metals demand. Slower implementation could extend fossil fuel consumption and delay part of that investment cycle.

Germany has meanwhile focused on the longer-term availability of allowances under the existing ETS, highlighting concern over how rapidly the emissions cap declines as Europe approaches its 2040 climate targets.

These debates show that Europe has broadly agreed on the direction of travel but not on the speed or industrial structure of the transition.

The eventual policy mix will influence where manufacturers invest, which automotive technologies survive and how quickly European material supply chains need to adapt.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s automotive debate is shifting from a simple ICE-versus-EV argument toward a contest over technology, carbon pricing and material origin. For metals markets, the final policy balance will determine how quickly demand moves toward batteries, copper and low-carbon steel.

EU Mexico Trade Agreement Opens Clean Tech and Critical Materials Opportunities

EU, Mexico

EU Mexico trade agreement signing marks a major update to a commercial relationship already worth around €100bn/yr in goods and services. The revised deal aims to remove tariffs and non-tariff barriers while creating new opportunities in clean technology, critical raw materials and agri-food trade.

EU Mexico trade agreement provisions will eliminate almost all high Mexican tariffs on EU imports. The affected sectors include machinery, mineral fuels, cars, car parts and a wide range of agri-food products.

EU Mexico trade agreement rules also include legally binding commitments on environmental protection and climate change. This gives the deal a strategic industrial angle beyond conventional tariff reduction.

The interim trade agreement is expected to move faster than the wider modernised global agreement. It needs European Parliament approval and qualified-majority approval from EU member states, rather than ratification by all 27 countries.

Clean Technology and Raw Materials Gain Strategic Relevance

The agreement could strengthen EU-Mexico cooperation in clean technology and critical raw materials. This matters as Europe seeks more diversified supply chains for energy transition equipment, electric vehicles, industrial machinery and advanced manufacturing.

Mexico is already a major manufacturing base linked to North American automotive and industrial supply chains. Better EU access could support machinery, components and clean technology exports into a market positioned between Europe and the US.

The deal also includes strict rules of origin, including for electric vehicles. EU officials said these rules are designed to prevent circumvention and avoid the agreement becoming a backdoor for Chinese production.

That detail is important. As tariffs, subsidies and local-content rules reshape global EV trade, rules of origin are becoming a core tool of industrial policy.

For European manufacturers, clearer access to Mexico may support exports of vehicles, parts, machinery and clean technology systems. For Mexican producers, greater access to the EU could strengthen trade in food, consumer products and selected industrial goods.

Tariff Cuts Combine With Climate and Circular Economy Commitments

Mexico will remove tariffs on key European exports including pork, dairy, cereals, fruit and pasta. Sensitive products will receive limited access through tariff-rate quotas.

The agreement also gives EU exporters broader quota access for dairy, beef, poultry and pork products. In return, Mexican producers will gain more liberalised access to the EU for products including coffee, fruit, chocolate and agave syrup.

Alongside the trade deal, both sides signed a circular economy declaration covering climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution, including plastics. This adds sustainability language to the commercial framework.

The agreement requires both parties to uphold international climate treaties, including the Paris Agreement. It also includes a dedicated dispute settlement procedure.

For metals and industrial supply chains, the wider message is clear. Trade agreements are increasingly combining market access, climate obligations, origin rules and supply-chain security.

The EU is using trade policy to support clean technology, critical raw materials cooperation and industrial competitiveness. Mexico gains deeper access to one of the world’s largest consumer markets while strengthening its role in global manufacturing networks.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU-Mexico deal shows how trade policy is becoming a supply-chain security instrument. The rules of origin for electric vehicles may prove as important as the tariff cuts, especially as Europe tries to protect clean technology markets from indirect Chinese competition.

Ford Energy BESS Deal With EDF Signals Automaker Push Into Grid Storage

Ford Energy

Ford Energy BESS deal with EDF Power Solutions North America marks a major step in Ford’s move from vehicle batteries into grid-scale energy storage. Ford Energy will supply EDF with 20GWh of battery energy storage systems over five years starting in 2028.

Ford Energy BESS deal gives EDF access to up to 4GWh/yr of DC block systems for utility-scale storage projects across the US. The agreement positions Ford Energy as a key domestic supplier for large energy storage developers.

Ford Energy BESS deal also shows how automakers are repurposing battery manufacturing assets for stationary storage. Ford is investing $2bn to convert its Glendale, Kentucky, battery facility for the BESS market.

The transaction connects three fast-growing demand drivers: grid storage, data centers and US-made battery systems. It also reinforces the strategic role of lithium iron phosphate batteries in stationary applications.

LFP Storage Supports Utilities, Data Centers and Industrial Customers

Ford Energy’s DC Block is a standardized 20ft containerized battery energy storage system. Each unit has 5.45MWh of capacity and uses lithium iron phosphate prismatic cells.

The system is available in two-hour and four-hour discharge configurations. That flexibility allows EDF to deploy storage across different grid services, renewable integration and peak-shifting applications.

LFP batteries are well suited to stationary storage because they offer cost advantages, safety benefits and long cycle life. They also reduce exposure to nickel and cobalt compared with higher-nickel lithium-ion chemistries.

Ford Energy plans to assemble BESS in the US for utilities, data centers, large industrial customers and commercial users. That customer mix reflects how electricity demand is changing.

Data centers are becoming a major new source of power demand. Battery storage can help manage grid congestion, renewable intermittency and backup power requirements.

EDF already has a large platform for deployment. The company has developed 26GW of projects and holds 17GW under service contracts, giving Ford Energy a major channel into the US storage market.

Repurposed Battery Capacity Strengthens US Storage Supply Chain

Ford Energy plans to deploy at least 20GWh/yr of BESS capacity, with first customer deliveries scheduled for late 2027. The EDF agreement will absorb a meaningful share of early output from 2028.

The Glendale investment is strategically important. It shows how battery manufacturing capacity originally linked to vehicle electrification can be redirected toward stationary storage.

This matters because EV demand growth has become less linear, while grid storage demand continues to rise. Automakers with battery manufacturing assets may find BESS a valuable second market.

The deal also strengthens the US energy storage supply chain. Domestic assembly can reduce logistics risk, support local content requirements and improve delivery certainty for infrastructure customers.

For battery materials, the agreement supports demand for lithium, phosphate, graphite, copper, aluminium and battery-grade chemicals tied to LFP cells and storage systems.

The wider implication is clear. Battery demand is no longer only an EV story. Utilities, data centers and industrial customers are becoming major buyers of battery systems as power reliability becomes a strategic constraint.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Ford’s EDF agreement shows that stationary storage is becoming a major outlet for battery manufacturing capacity. The strategic winners will be companies that can combine US assembly, LFP chemistry and long-term supply agreements with grid and data-center customers.

EU EV Transition Faces Energy Cost and Trade Policy Pressure

EU energy

EU EV transition plans are facing growing pressure from high energy costs, tougher global competition and a regulatory model that industry leaders say may be weakening Europe’s automotive position. Speakers at the FT Future of the Car Summit warned that Europe must rethink how it competes with China and other industrial economies.

EU EV transition policy has relied heavily on regulation, including the planned 2035 phase-out of new internal combustion engine car sales. But carmakers and suppliers argue that regulation alone cannot deliver a competitive electric vehicle industry if energy prices, subsidies and supply-chain costs remain unfavourable.

EU EV transition challenges are becoming more visible as Chinese automakers gain share in Europe, southeast Asia and Latin America. Chinese producers have built cost-competitive EV platforms through subsidies, domestic competition, supply-chain control and fast industrial scaling.

The debate matters for metals because slower or more expensive electrification can reshape demand for lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, copper, aluminium and rare earth magnets. Automotive materials demand will still grow, but the path may become less direct and more exposed to policy choices.

China’s EV Scale Forces Europe to Rethink Trade Strategy

European automotive suppliers are calling for a more realistic approach to global competition. The industry is facing rivals that operate under different labour, subsidy and industrial policy conditions.

China has become one of the world’s strongest EV exporters. It accounted for around 40% of global EV exports in 2024, while leading Chinese brands have expanded aggressively with lower-cost, technology-rich vehicles.

This creates a competitive problem for European carmakers. Europe has focused on setting strict emissions targets, while China has focused on making EVs cheaper, scalable and export-ready.

Several industry executives now argue that collaboration may become unavoidable. Western manufacturers may need to partner with Chinese or other international competitors that already have a technological lead in EV platforms, batteries, software and power electronics.

This could change European supply chains. Rather than developing every technology internally, carmakers may increasingly combine European assembly and branding with externally sourced EV systems.

That strategy could support faster electrification, but it also creates dependence on imported components, battery materials and processed inputs. It may help automakers compete on cost, but it does not solve Europe’s strategic materials vulnerability.

Energy Costs Could Slow Consumer Adoption and Metals Demand

High charging and energy costs are another major barrier to Europe’s EV push. If consumers face much higher charging costs than drivers in China or other regions, the economic case for EV adoption weakens.

This is critical because EV demand is highly sensitive to total ownership cost. Batteries may become cheaper, but charging costs, highway tariffs and energy price volatility can still shape consumer decisions.

For battery metals, this matters directly. Slower EV adoption would reduce the speed of demand growth for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese, especially in full battery electric vehicles with large battery packs.

Copper and aluminium remain better positioned across multiple automotive pathways. EVs require copper for wiring, motors, charging systems and power electronics, while aluminium supports lightweighting, battery enclosures and structural components.

However, Europe’s automotive metals demand will increasingly depend on which technology mix wins. Full BEVs support larger battery metals demand, while hybrids and lower-cost EV platforms could shift consumption toward smaller batteries, more electronics and continued use of conventional automotive materials.

The policy challenge is therefore industrial as much as environmental. Europe must reduce emissions while keeping manufacturing competitive, securing raw materials and lowering energy costs for consumers.

If Europe cannot align regulation, energy prices and trade strategy, its EV transition could become a market for imported vehicles rather than a platform for domestic industrial growth.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s EV problem is not only about regulation or consumer demand. It is about whether the region can build a cost-competitive industrial system around energy, materials, technology and trade before Chinese EV platforms define the market.

Automotive Raw Material Supply Chains Hit Localisation Limits

Automotive

Automotive raw material supply chains are becoming the main constraint on electric vehicle localisation as carmakers seek more control over strategic components. Automakers want regional supply chains, but battery metals, rare earths and processed inputs still depend on global mining and refining networks.

Automotive raw material supply chains have shifted from pure efficiency toward resilience, security and geopolitical risk management. The industry is no longer trying only to minimise cost. It is trying to protect production from export controls, licensing delays, trade restrictions and raw material shortages.

Automotive raw material supply chains therefore cannot be fully localised by assembling batteries, motors or electronics closer to vehicle plants. The deeper constraint sits upstream, where lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese and rare earth materials remain tied to global extraction and processing capacity.

The result is a more selective supply-chain model. Automakers will regionalise the components they can control, while still relying on global raw materials for the minerals and refined products they cannot replace quickly.

EV Localisation Still Depends on Global Critical Minerals

Jaguar Land Rover has decided to control three critical parts of electric propulsion: battery assembly, electric drive units and energy management systems. This gives the company more control over the final systems that define EV performance.

However, vertical integration has limits. Even if an automaker controls battery assembly or electric drive units, it may not control the lithium chemicals, nickel sulphate, cobalt, manganese, graphite or rare earth magnets inside those systems.

Permanent magnet motors remain one of the clearest pressure points. Electric drive units depend on rare earth materials that are still heavily exposed to Chinese processing, magnet production and export licensing.

Obtaining magnet raw materials from China has become more difficult from a licensing perspective. This shows how export controls can affect vehicle production even when the final assembly line is located in Europe or the US.

Battery supply chains face the same structural problem. Automakers can localise pack assembly, module production and software integration, but raw material exposure remains global.

Lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese supply depends on mine locations, refining capacity, chemical conversion and government policy. These inputs cannot be made local simply by building a battery plant near an auto factory.

This changes the meaning of automotive localisation. The next phase will be less about full independence and more about reducing exposure to single-country bottlenecks.

Recycling and Traceability Become Strategic Tools

Critical minerals recycling is becoming a strategic issue for automakers, not only an environmental goal. Black mass recovery can eventually return lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper and other materials into the supply chain.

Recycling can reduce raw material exposure over time. But it depends on enough end-of-life batteries, reliable collection systems, safe transport, processing capacity and customer acceptance of recovered materials.

The UK’s critical minerals strategy reflects this reality. Domestic production, partner-country supply agreements and recycling can improve resilience, but full self-sufficiency is not realistic.

That point matters for manufacturers. Supply security will depend on diversified sourcing, trusted partners, recycling loops and traceable material flows rather than a complete break from global markets.

The shift will also affect pricing. Materials may increasingly carry value based on origin, regulatory acceptability, sustainability documentation and licensing risk.

A battery metal or rare earth input from a secure and traceable source may command a premium over lower-cost material with higher geopolitical or compliance risk.

For automakers, the strategic challenge is clear. They must control more of the EV system while accepting that critical mineral supply will remain globally contested.

For metals suppliers, the opportunity is also clear. Producers that can offer traceable, compliant and secure supply will become more valuable to automotive customers than suppliers competing only on price.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Automakers are learning that EV localisation stops where raw material dependence begins. The winners in automotive supply security will be those that connect local manufacturing with diversified minerals, recycling capacity and credible traceability.

Battery Metals Demand Faces Slower Path as Hybrid Vehicle Growth Extends

Battery Metals

Battery metals demand could face a slower growth path as carmakers and suppliers expect hybrids and range extenders to remain important for longer than earlier electric-only transition models assumed. Speakers at the FT Future of the Car summit said vehicle decarbonisation should be measured by emissions reduction, not only battery electric vehicle share.

Battery metals demand remains structurally supported by electrification. However, a longer hybrid phase could reduce near-term demand intensity for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese because hybrid vehicles use smaller battery packs than full battery electric vehicles.

Battery metals demand assumptions are therefore becoming more complex. Automotive electrification is still progressing, but the industry is moving toward a mixed powertrain future rather than a simple shift from combustion engines to full BEVs.

Horse Powertrain chief executive Matias Giannini said half of passenger vehicles could still be produced with some form of combustion or hybrid powertrain by 2040. That outlook would keep investment flowing into efficient hybrid systems alongside EV platforms.

Hybrid Growth Changes the Battery Raw Materials Curve

Hybrid vehicle growth could temper the pace of battery raw material demand without reversing electrification. Hybrids and range extenders still require electric motors, inverters, wiring and batteries, but their battery packs are much smaller than those used in BEVs.

This matters most for nickel. High-nickel NCM and NCA batteries are closely tied to longer-range BEVs, where larger packs are needed to deliver performance and driving range.

A slower BEV ramp-up could delay some of the nickel sulphate demand growth that has supported investment cases for new battery-grade nickel projects. It could also affect cobalt and manganese demand in cathode chemistries exposed to full EV penetration rates.

Lithium remains supported across almost every electrification pathway. Still, a longer hybrid transition could slow the rate at which large-format BEV batteries absorb lithium units.

The shift does not mean automotive metals demand will weaken across the board. Hybrids use more copper than conventional combustion vehicles because they require electric motors, power electronics and more complex wiring systems.

Continued hybrid and combustion production also supports aluminium castings, stainless steel, exhaust components and engine-related materials. Meanwhile, BEV growth still supports aluminium lightweighting, copper wiring, charging infrastructure and battery materials.

The result is a less linear automotive metals outlook. Battery metals may grow more slowly than aggressive BEV scenarios suggest, while broader automotive metals consumption remains supported by platform complexity and mixed powertrain production.

Policy Flexibility Could Reshape European Metal Demand

European suppliers are pushing for more flexibility in the EU regulatory framework. Current policy remains heavily weighted toward full electrification through tailpipe emissions targets.

The EU targets a 100% reduction in tailpipe emissions from new cars and vans from 2035. That effectively ends new combustion engine sales unless future exemptions are created.

Industry participants increasingly want a more technology-neutral route. They argue that hybrids, range extenders, renewable fuels and lower-carbon manufacturing should contribute to emissions reduction alongside BEVs.

This policy debate matters for metals. Battery material demand depends heavily on BEV penetration, average pack size and chemistry choice.

If Europe allows a longer role for hybrids and range extenders, lithium-ion battery capacity demand per vehicle could grow more slowly. That would affect demand forecasts for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese.

Chinese EV and hybrid technology is also improving quickly. This puts pressure on European and US automakers to share development costs across BEV, hybrid and range-extender platforms.

For suppliers, the strategic issue is flexibility. Companies tied only to high-growth BEV battery assumptions may face demand timing risk, while suppliers serving copper, aluminium, stainless steel, electronics and hybrid systems may benefit from a broader platform mix.

The automotive transition is still real, but the material demand path is becoming more diversified. Metals markets must now track powertrain mix, not only EV sales headlines.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Hybrid growth does not weaken the energy transition, but it changes the metals timing. Battery metals demand will still rise, yet copper, aluminium and hybrid-related materials may capture more value if automakers choose a longer mixed-powertrain route.

Stellantis Leapmotor Spain BEV Production Plan Signals Localised Chinese EV Strategy

Stellantis

Stellantis Leapmotor Spain BEV production plans could mark a new phase in Europe’s electric vehicle supply chain, as western automakers look to combine local assembly with lower-cost Chinese components. Stellantis and Leapmotor are considering new battery electric vehicle lines at Zaragoza and Villaverde in Spain through their Leapmotor International joint venture.

Stellantis Leapmotor Spain BEV production would move the partnership beyond vehicle imports and toward European manufacturing. That shift matters because local content rules, tariff risk and regional supply security are becoming more important in the EV market.

Stellantis Leapmotor Spain BEV production could also help the companies respond to weaker European affordability conditions. Chinese component sourcing can lower cost, while Spanish assembly may improve regulatory and commercial positioning inside Europe.

The companies have not disclosed production targets, utilisation rates or investment figures. This leaves the scale of the plan uncertain, but the strategic direction is clear.

Spain Could Become a European Platform for Leapmotor Models

Zaragoza could gain a new all-electric SUV line as early as this year. The plant has long been associated with Opel production and could become a base for new BEV output under the joint venture.

Villaverde in Madrid may also become more important to Leapmotor International. The plant faces a production gap after Citroen C4 output ends and may shift entirely to Leapmotor models by 2029.

That potential transition would give Stellantis a way to protect industrial activity at existing Spanish plants while adding lower-cost BEV models to its European portfolio.

The plan reflects a broader industry pattern. European automakers are trying to defend market share against Chinese EV competition while also using Chinese platforms, components and cost structures to improve competitiveness.

Stellantis bought a 21% stake in Leapmotor in 2023 and created a 51-49 joint venture to sell and manufacture Leapmotor vehicles outside China. Spain could now become one of the key production bases for that strategy.

For Spain, the opportunity is industrial. More BEV assembly could support jobs, supplier activity and demand for local logistics, batteries, wiring, aluminium components and electronics integration.

Local Assembly Meets Cost Pressure and Supply-Chain Rules

The move from imports to local production is strategically important. European BEV manufacturing is increasingly shaped by tariffs, local content rules, battery sourcing requirements and political pressure to keep vehicle production inside the region.

Leapmotor brings cost-competitive EV engineering and components. Stellantis brings European plants, distribution, regulatory experience and manufacturing scale.

This combination could help address one of Europe’s biggest EV problems: producing affordable electric vehicles while maintaining regional industrial capacity.

However, the lack of disclosed volumes makes the market impact difficult to judge. Without production targets, it is unclear whether the Spain plans will materially change Stellantis’ European BEV output.

Stellantis needs stronger BEV momentum. Its BEV sales accounted for around 13% of output in the first half of last year, behind Volkswagen and BMW, and the company later reported a major write-down after cutting prices.

Leapmotor is growing much faster. Its EV sales, including plug-in hybrids, more than doubled last year to 596,000 units. That growth gives Stellantis access to a Chinese partner with clear scale momentum.

The industrial implication extends into materials. More European BEV production increases demand for aluminium body and structural parts, copper wiring, electrical steel, battery materials, power electronics and lightweight components.

If the model works, Stellantis and Leapmotor could create a template for Chinese-designed, Europe-built EVs. That would reshape competition not only in vehicles, but also in the upstream materials and component chains that support regional BEV manufacturing.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Stellantis and Leapmotor are not only discussing new Spanish EV lines; they are testing a hybrid supply-chain model for Europe. Local assembly with Chinese components may become a practical route for automakers caught between cost pressure, tariff risk and the need to keep European factories active.

Zhongke Anode Material Sales Surge as Energy Storage Demand Accelerates

Zhongke

Zhongke anode material sales rose sharply in 2025 as China’s lithium-ion battery sector expanded across new energy vehicles and power storage. Hunan Zhongke Electric sold 363,253t of anode materials during the year, up 62% from 2024.

Zhongke anode material sales were supported by strong downstream demand and higher operating rates. The company’s output increased by 66% to 378,469t, reflecting a rapid scale-up in response to battery market growth.

Zhongke anode material sales also lifted revenue. Revenue from anode materials rose by 60% to 7.99bn yuan, broadly in line with the increase in shipment volumes.

The result shows how anode materials remain one of the key beneficiaries of battery expansion. Demand is no longer driven only by electric vehicles. Grid storage, industrial storage and AI-related power demand are becoming increasingly important.

Capacity Utilisation Tightens as China Battery Demand Expands

Zhongke’s anode material capacity reached 348,683 t/yr in 2025, up 46% from a year earlier. The increase followed equipment and technology upgrades across its production base.

Capacity utilisation rose to 108.6% from 95.7% in 2024. This shows that Zhongke was operating above nameplate capacity as demand outpaced available production capability.

The company is now expanding further. A third-phase project at its Zhaotong site in Yunnan province is under construction and will add 100,000 t/yr of anode material capacity by the end of 2026.

Zhaotong has become a key growth platform. The first phase, with 15,000 t/yr of capacity, started production in April 2020. The second phase, with 100,000 t/yr of capacity, began operations in March 2024.

Zhongke is also planning a 300,000 t/yr anode material complex in Luzhou, Sichuan province. This would further strengthen its position in China’s graphite anode supply chain.

The expansion reflects a broader industry trend. Anode producers are adding capacity to serve battery makers that need reliable supply, stable quality and lower-cost materials for high-volume cell production.

Overseas Expansion Targets Storage and Non-China Customers

Zhongke is also building a 100,000 t/yr anode material plant in Tangier, Morocco. The project targets customers outside China and reflects the growing need for regionalised battery material supply chains.

Morocco offers strategic value because it is close to European markets and has become more attractive for battery-related investment. For Chinese anode producers, overseas capacity can help serve customers facing localisation, trade and supply-chain security requirements.

Energy storage is becoming a major long-term demand driver. Global energy storage battery shipments reached 651.5GWh in 2025, up 76.2% from a year earlier. Chinese companies accounted for 614.7GWh, or 94.4% of global shipments.

EV Tank expects global energy storage battery shipments to exceed 2TWh by 2030. If this forecast materialises, anode material demand will continue rising across China and overseas markets.

Policy is also supporting growth. China is moving new energy storage from mandatory allocation toward a more market-oriented system, including capacity pricing support for independent grid-side storage.

AI data centres are adding another demand layer. Rapid growth in electricity consumption from AI infrastructure is increasing the need for power storage, grid stability and backup capacity.

Europe is also expanding storage under energy security strategies. EU member states installed 27.1GWh of new battery energy storage systems in 2025, up 45% from the previous year.

For Zhongke, this demand mix supports a larger and more international anode strategy. The company is positioning itself to serve China’s dominant battery ecosystem while preparing for overseas demand linked to storage, EVs and grid resilience.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Zhongke’s growth shows that anode materials are moving from an EV-driven market into a broader energy infrastructure market. The next competitive phase will depend on overseas localisation, graphite supply security and the ability to serve storage demand outside China.

Lithium-Ion Battery Copper Foil Shipments Surge as Ultra-Thin Products Gain Share

Copper Foil

Lithium-ion battery copper foil shipments rose sharply in 2025 as global battery production expanded and manufacturers shifted toward thinner materials to reduce copper costs. Global shipments reached 1.302mn t, up 41.7% from 2024, according to Chinese research institute EV Tank.

Lithium-ion battery copper foil demand remains closely tied to electric vehicle and energy storage growth. Copper foil is a key current collector in lithium-ion batteries, making it essential to cell performance, energy density and manufacturing cost.

Lithium-ion battery copper foil shipments were dominated by China, which accounted for 82.9% of global deliveries in 2025. EV Tank expects global shipments to reach 2.615mn t by 2030, implying continued expansion as battery output scales.

The product mix changed quickly during the year. The share of 8μm foil declined, while 6μm remained the mainstream product and accounted for more than 70% of total shipments.

Ultra-Thin Foil Gains Momentum on Copper Cost Pressure

Ultra-thin copper foil gained share as battery producers looked for ways to reduce copper input costs. Persistently high global copper prices pushed cell manufacturers to use thinner foil while maintaining battery performance.

The combined share of 5μm and 4.5μm ultra-thin foil rose to 24% in 2025. This is a major shift for a material category that requires tighter production control, better surface quality and stronger consistency.

Thinner copper foil can help reduce battery weight and improve energy density. It also lowers the amount of copper used per cell, which becomes increasingly important when copper prices remain elevated.

EV Tank expects 5μm and thinner foil to become a key material for high-end batteries. This reflects the industry’s move toward lighter, higher-energy-density cell designs.

However, thinner foil also raises manufacturing difficulty. Producers must control pinholes, tensile strength, elongation, surface roughness and coating compatibility more precisely.

That technical barrier could separate higher-end suppliers from lower-cost producers. As battery customers shift toward thinner grades, qualification and process reliability will become more important than simple capacity.

China Leads Supply as Competition Intensifies

China’s 82.9% share of global shipments shows its dominant role in battery copper foil supply. The country has built large-scale capacity around its lithium-ion battery ecosystem, supported by domestic EV, energy storage and cell manufacturing growth.

Competition intensified in 2025 as the market recovered and producers brought earlier-built capacity on line. This created a more fluid ranking among suppliers.

Longdian Wason ranked first with a 12.2% market share. Huachuang New Material followed after capacity ramp-ups lifted output and sales.

Defu Technology and Jiayuan Technology ranked third and fourth, respectively. Seven companies in the top 10 changed positions during the year, showing how quickly capacity, customer access and product mix are reshaping the sector.

Battery makers also increased procurement from second-tier suppliers to improve supply stability. This suggests buyers are trying to diversify supplier bases rather than rely only on leading producers.

For copper markets, the trend is strategically important. Battery copper foil growth creates a direct link between copper demand and battery technology. But the move toward ultra-thin foil also means battery growth will not translate into copper demand on a simple one-to-one basis.

The sector is therefore entering a more technical phase. Volume growth remains strong, but material intensity, foil thickness, supplier qualification and copper price pressure will all shape future demand.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The copper foil market shows how battery growth can lift copper demand while also forcing material thrift. High copper prices are pushing battery makers toward thinner foil, making technology and process control as important as raw capacity.

Golden Dragon Magnet Output Expansion Strengthens Baotou NdFeB Capacity

Golden Dragon, Rare Earths

Golden Dragon magnet output is set to expand as the Chinese rare earths and magnet producer prepares trial production at the second phase of its Baotou plant in Inner Mongolia. The new phase is scheduled to start trial operations in December.

Golden Dragon magnet output at the second phase will add 5,000 t/yr of high-performance neodymium-iron-boron magnetic materials. The first phase began trial operations in September 2025 and is already running at full capacity of 5,000 t/yr.

Golden Dragon magnet output growth will lift the company’s Baotou high-performance NdFeB magnet capacity to 10,000 t/yr once the second phase is operating. The expansion reinforces Baotou’s role as a key rare earth magnet manufacturing hub in northern China.

The company also operates 15,000 t/yr of rough NdFeB magnet production capacity at its Changting facility in Longyan, Fujian province.

Baotou Expansion Adds High-Performance Magnet Capacity

The Baotou expansion strengthens Golden Dragon’s position in high-performance NdFeB magnets. These materials are critical for electric vehicles, wind turbines, energy-saving motors, robotics, consumer electronics and advanced industrial equipment.

High-performance NdFeB magnets require stable access to rare earth feedstocks such as neodymium and praseodymium. In higher-temperature applications, dysprosium and terbium can also be important to improve magnetic performance and durability.

Golden Dragon’s expansion is therefore not only a capacity addition. It reflects China’s effort to maintain scale and technical leadership in downstream rare earth applications.

The second phase also improves Golden Dragon’s ability to serve customers that require more consistent magnet quality and larger supply volumes. This is particularly important in sectors such as EV motors and wind power, where qualification and long-term supply reliability matter.

As a wholly owned subsidiary of Xiamen Tungsten, Golden Dragon benefits from its parent company’s broader rare earth and metals platform. That connection supports feedstock access, downstream integration and customer development.

EVs, Wind Turbines and Electronics Support Demand

Golden Dragon has been expanding magnet production in response to rapid growth across key application sectors. Demand continues to rise from wind turbines, consumer electronics, energy-saving motors, home appliances and new energy vehicles.

The demand outlook is especially important for high-performance NdFeB magnets. EV traction motors and direct-drive wind turbines require powerful, compact and efficient magnetic materials.

Energy-saving motors and smart appliances are also increasing magnet consumption. As efficiency standards rise, manufacturers need stronger magnetic materials to improve performance and reduce energy use.

Xiamen Tungsten’s 2025 results show the strength of this broader materials platform. The company’s revenue rose by 30.79% on the year to 46.26bn yuan, while profit increased by 34.89% to 2.3bn yuan.

Revenue from Xiamen Tungsten’s rare earths sector rose by 10% to 6bn yuan in 2025. This reflects continued demand for rare earth materials and magnet-related products despite growing competition in the sector.

For China’s rare earth value chain, Golden Dragon’s Baotou expansion reinforces a strategic advantage. China remains dominant not only in rare earth separation, but also in downstream magnet manufacturing, where industrial scale and customer qualification are difficult to replicate quickly.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Golden Dragon’s Baotou expansion shows that China is still building strength at the most valuable end of the rare earth chain. The strategic issue for global buyers is not only rare earth supply, but access to qualified magnet capacity at industrial scale.