LB Titanium Dioxide Output Falls as Sponge and Battery Materials Expand

LB Titanium

LB titanium dioxide output fell in 2025 as weaker prices, slower demand and rising trade barriers pressured the global pigment market. China’s largest titanium producer reported titanium dioxide production of 1.28mn t, down 1.5% from a year earlier.

LB titanium dioxide output declined even as sales edged higher to 1.26mn t. Domestic sales accounted for 45% of volumes, while international sales made up 55%, showing that overseas markets remain critical to the company’s TiO2 business.

LB titanium dioxide output came under pressure from structural oversupply. New capacity entered the market, prices weakened and several domestic producers cut operating rates to protect margins.

The company also pointed to anti-dumping duties imposed by the EU, Brazil, Saudi Arabia and the Eurasian Economic Union, along with higher US tariffs on Chinese material. These measures have fragmented trade flows and made the global titanium dioxide market more difficult for Chinese exporters.

Titanium Sponge Offers a Stronger Counterweight

LB’s titanium sponge business moved in the opposite direction. Titanium sponge output rose by 2.3% on the year to 71,300t, while sales increased by 0.9% to 67,500t.

The stronger sponge result matters because titanium sponge sits closer to aerospace, industrial titanium mill products and high-performance alloy supply chains. It gives LB a more diversified titanium platform beyond pigment markets.

Titanium sponge prices were also firmer. Domestic 99.7% grade sponge prices averaged 49,665 yuan/t ex-works in 2025, up from 48,270 yuan/t a year earlier.

LB has 80,000 t/yr of titanium sponge capacity, the largest globally. That scale gives the company a major position in a market where feedstock security, product quality and downstream demand from titanium processors remain strategically important.

Titanium concentrate output fell by 3% to 1.45mn t, but LB did not sell concentrate externally. All concentrate was consumed internally to produce titanium dioxide and titanium sponge.

This internal use highlights the company’s integrated titanium value chain. LB can direct feedstock toward different downstream products depending on market conditions, although weak TiO2 demand still affects overall profitability.

Iron ore concentrate output fell more sharply, dropping by 18% to 3.04mn t. Sales decreased by 2.1% to 2.94mn t, showing softer performance in another mineral by-product stream.

Iron Phosphate Growth Signals Battery Materials Diversification

LB’s battery materials business showed much stronger momentum. Iron phosphate output jumped by 72% to 97,600t, while sales rose by 59% to 96,000t.

The growth was driven by firm demand from the lithium-ion battery sector. Iron phosphate is a key precursor for lithium iron phosphate cathode materials, which are widely used in electric vehicles and energy storage systems.

This diversification is strategically important. Titanium dioxide remains LB’s largest product line, but the pigment market is facing oversupply, trade restrictions and weaker pricing. Battery materials offer a different growth channel tied to China’s expanding LFP ecosystem.

LB has 100,000 t/yr of iron phosphate capacity and 50,000 t/yr of LFP capacity. It also has 25,000 t/yr of graphite anode capacity and 50,000 t/yr of graphitisation capacity.

That product base positions LB across titanium, zirconium and battery materials. The company is no longer only a titanium dioxide producer, even though it remains the world’s largest TiO2 producer with 1.51mn t/yr of capacity.

The 2025 results show a clear split in the business. Titanium dioxide is under pressure from oversupply and trade action. Titanium sponge is holding stronger. Iron phosphate is growing with battery demand.

For LB, the industrial challenge is to manage a mature pigment business while expanding higher-growth materials platforms. Its integrated mineral base gives it flexibility, but market conditions across TiO2, sponge and battery materials are moving in different directions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

LB’s results show how Chinese titanium producers are moving beyond pigment exposure into sponge and battery materials. The strategic value lies in feedstock integration, because companies that can shift internal mineral flows between TiO2, titanium sponge and battery precursors will be better positioned in volatile markets.

Toho Titanium Sales Fall as Aerospace Inventory Correction Hits Sponge Demand

Toho Titanium

Toho Titanium sales fell sharply in the third quarter as aerospace customers continued drawing down inventories instead of ordering new titanium units. The company’s titanium metal sales in October-December dropped 21pc year on year to ¥13bn from ¥16.4bn. Sales for the first nine months also fell 19pc to ¥40.2bn. As a result, Toho Titanium sales now reflect a deeper inventory-led slowdown across the aerospace titanium chain.

This matters because titanium demand weakness is not coming from structural aerospace decline. It is coming from excess inventories built across the supply chain, from sponge to finished parts. That overhang has reduced the need for fresh titanium sponge purchases in 2025. Therefore, titanium sponge demand remains under pressure even while broader aerospace activity stays more resilient in other segments.

Toho’s wider business mix softened the blow, but not enough to offset titanium weakness. Total net sales for April-December reached ¥61.3bn, with catalysts and chemicals contributing part of that base. However, overall nine-month net sales still declined 7pc from a year earlier. Consequently, the titanium downturn remains the main reason the group’s broader sales picture weakened.

Aerospace Titanium Inventories Continue to Delay New Orders

Aerospace titanium inventories are still the core issue behind the current slowdown. Manufacturers across the chain are using existing stock instead of placing aggressive new orders. That pattern has limited demand for upstream titanium producers such as Toho. As a result, Toho Titanium sales are being constrained more by inventory correction than by end-market collapse.

The company’s guidance reflects that cautious environment. Toho maintained its full-year titanium metal sales forecast at ¥53bn. That implies fourth-quarter titanium sales of roughly ¥12.8bn, close to the third-quarter level. Therefore, management is not yet expecting a strong rebound before the fiscal year ends.

This suggests the market is stabilizing at a lower level rather than turning sharply higher. The inventory correction appears persistent enough to cap near-term recovery. Meanwhile, buyers are still waiting for supply chain balances to improve before resuming stronger raw material purchases.

Japan Titanium Market Faces a Slower Recovery Timeline

Japan titanium market conditions now point to a slower recovery than many suppliers would prefer. High inventories across aerospace are expected to persist until at least mid-2026. That means upstream titanium producers may continue facing muted order patterns for several more quarters. Consequently, titanium sponge demand may stay softer even if aircraft and engine activity improves elsewhere.

This split matters for interpreting the market correctly. Downstream aerospace repair and engine demand can stay firm while upstream sponge demand remains weak. The reason is simple: inventory must clear before new raw material buying accelerates. Therefore, Toho Titanium sales are acting as an early warning signal for how uneven the aerospace recovery still is.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Toho’s results show that titanium recovery is still being delayed by inventory, not by lack of long-term aerospace relevance. The market will likely improve, but upstream sponge producers may be among the last to feel it. Until inventories normalize, titanium demand will remain more cautious than aerospace headlines suggest.

Uncertainty Looms Over Russian Ferro-Titanium Market Amid EU Sanctions

Ferro-Titanium (Fe-Ti)

The European ferro-titanium (FeTi) market is facing a period of uncertainty as the EU sanctions on Russian ferro-alloys are set to be fully enforced. Market participants are divided over whether the sanctions will have a lasting impact on Russian FeTi supplies or if the overhang of Russian units in Europe, coupled with low demand from steel mills, will continue to create downward pressure on prices in 2025. A key point of concern is the potential for circumvention, with fears that Russian material may be rerouted or rebranded through non-EU countries.

Legal Framework and Market Response to Sanctions

Under the sanctions, ferro-titanium imports from Russia that were contracted before 19 December 2023 and presented to customs before 20 December 2024 may still enter free circulation within the EU. However, despite the clear framework outlined in Council Regulation 833/2014, uncertainty continues to surround how the market will react once these conditions change.

"Everyone is waiting for 20 December, it seems nobody understands what will happen," commented a European producer. There is significant ambiguity as to how the market will balance the loss of Russian material, particularly in light of high inventories of Russian ferro-titanium already present in warehouses in the Netherlands, Estonia, Latvia, and Germany. Imports in 2024 have already been lower than in previous years, but it remains unclear where the remaining stock will end up, especially as many buyers continue to avoid Russian FeTi.

Trade Dynamics and Impact on the Market

Despite sanctions, imports of Russian ferro-titanium to the EU remained significant in 2024, particularly in Estonia, Germany, and the Netherlands. In fact, Estonian imports in October 2024 reached a 10-year high of 591 tonnes, signaling that sanctions have not entirely stopped the flow of Russian material into the EU. Westbrook Resources, a UK producer, has called for increased vigilance among buyers to ensure they are not inadvertently purchasing smuggled or rerouted material, highlighting the difficulty of tracking the origin of ferro-titanium in the current market environment.

As of 20 December 2024, no fresh Russian ferro-alloys will be allowed into the EU, leading to a projected loss of 766 tonnes per month based on 2023 averages. While EU and UK producers may be able to cover this shortfall with unused capacity, the reduction in available supply is likely to increase demand for raw materials, driving up prices for scrap and raising production costs for ferro-titanium. However, overall demand from steel mills and cored wire manufacturers has been weak, due to an economic downturn and lower steel prices. This will likely temper any significant price increases, though temporary spikes may occur if first-quarter tenders prompt urgent purchases.

Circumvention Risks: Material Rerouting and Relabelling

Despite the official ban on Russian ferro-titanium imports, there are ongoing concerns about circumvention. The EU regulation explicitly prohibits releasing goods if there are grounds to suspect circumvention, but market sources argue that loopholes remain. Materials may be rerouted, relabelled, or blended through countries such as Turkey, India, China, or Kazakhstan, creating a potential grey market for Russian FeTi in Europe. Chinese imports of Russian ferro-titanium have already been on the rise, suggesting that circumvention may already be in play, though Europe has not yet seen significant volumes of these rerouted materials.

Logistics challenges, including the extra costs of rerouting and repackaging, may limit the feasibility of circumvention unless steel prices in Europe increase. Additionally, there are reports that Russian producers may shift to exporting titanium scrap, a material not covered under the EU sanctions. This could provide an alternative route for Russian producers to bypass restrictions, further complicating the market dynamics.

Conclusion

As the sanctions on Russian ferro-titanium fully come into force in December 2024, European market participants remain in a state of uncertainty, unsure of how the market will respond to the loss of Russian material and the potential for circumvention. While EU producers may absorb some of the shortfall with existing capacity, broader market conditions, including weak demand from steelmakers and rising production costs, could create a complex and volatile pricing environment.

EU Ferro-Titanium Prices Decline Amid Weak Demand and Russian Imports

Russian Ferro-Titanium

Ferro-titanium prices in the European and UK markets have faced a significant decline of 6.5% in the second half of 2024, driven by several key factors. The most notable reasons for this decrease include an ongoing influx of Russian ferro-titanium imports, weakening demand from steel mills, and a substantial drop in the cost of titanium scrap.

As of recent assessments, Russian ferro-titanium prices are sitting at $5.20–5.60 per kilogram of titanium delivered to Europe (import duty unpaid), representing a widening discount compared to European and UK market prices. Sellers in Europe, holding large inventories, are eager to offload their stock before the end of the year, while Russian producers are scrambling to secure contracts before sanctions take full effect on December 20, 2024.

Russian Imports and Weak Demand Pressure Prices

Historically, ferro-titanium prices see an uptick in the first quarter, driven by steel mills restocking and seasonal disruptions in scrap deliveries around late December and early January. This year, however, the expected price rally failed to materialize. Although European Union (EU) sanctions initially prompted some price increases due to mills tightening procurement terms, the continued influx of Russian imports has kept prices under pressure. While Russian ferro-titanium volumes to the EU have fluctuated, the EU has remained the largest importer of Russian material.

From January to August 2024, the EU imported 6,115 tons of Russian ferro-titanium, down from 8,018 tons in the same period of the previous year. However, in July and August, imports rose by 21% and 9%, respectively. Estonia and the Netherlands accounted for 70% of these imports, with Germany and Latvia sharing the remainder. Despite a drop in overall imports, the EU continues to face competition from other regions, particularly China, which has seen a rise in Russian ferro-titanium exports.

The lack of spot demand across multiple non-ferrous markets, including those adjacent to steel and aluminum industries, has been a contributing factor. The sluggish performance of Europe's automotive and construction sectors further dampened demand. Steel association Eurofer recently downgraded its 2024 steel consumption forecast to a 1.8% contraction, signaling weak prospects for the steel market in Europe. The closure of Volkswagen plants in Germany and ongoing industrial slowdowns have heightened concerns over Europe's economic outlook.

Titanium Scrap Costs and Market Outlook

The downturn in ferro-titanium prices has been exacerbated by a sharp drop in titanium scrap prices. In early October 2024, titanium turnings prices plummeted, prompting ferro-titanium prices to follow suit. As scrap dealers began releasing more material into the market, the availability of titanium scrap increased, driving down prices further. Currently, the spread between 90/6/4 titanium turnings and ferro-titanium in Europe is around $3 per kilogram, up from a year-to-date average of $2.81 per kilogram. In the U.S., titanium scrap prices have also fallen, with mixed turnings now priced at $0.90–1.00 per pound.

Scrap processors, sitting on high inventories of aerospace-grade turnings and solids, may push out more ferro-titanium grade material to free up space and generate cash flow before the year ends. This move could further intensify the downward pressure on ferro-titanium prices, as scrap processors attempt to liquidate their stocks.

Market Forecast and Challenges Ahead

Despite expectations of a price rebound, both short-term and medium-term forecasts for the ferro-titanium market remain uncertain. Eurofer has projected a 3.8% recovery in steel consumption by 2025, while the World Steel Association expects a 1.2% growth in the global steel market in 2025. However, these increases are unlikely to signal a full recovery, as they come after two years of contraction in the sector. As Europe grapples with economic challenges, the demand for ferro-titanium remains subdued, and prices are expected to stay under pressure in the coming months.

Titanium Scrap Demand and Prices Expected to Rise in 2025, Driven by Boeing Recovery and Melter Expansions

Titanium Scrap

The outlook for titanium scrap is becoming increasingly positive as demand is expected to surge in the second half of 2025. This rise is driven by a recovery in aerospace manufacturing, particularly from Boeing, and planned expansions in titanium melting capacity. These factors are expected to have a significant impact on the titanium scrap market, which has faced challenges throughout 2024.

Boeing and Aerospace Recovery

After a year marked by disruptions in production schedules and supply chain bottlenecks, aerospace manufacturers are expecting a rebound. In 2024, the anticipated increase in titanium scrap demand did not materialize as expected, largely due to production missteps at Boeing and delays in Airbus’s ramp targets. However, a recovery in Boeing's production, particularly of the 737 MAX and the 787 Dreamliner, is poised to fuel higher scrap consumption.

Boeing’s 737 MAX production, which was temporarily halted due to a seven-week strike, is set to resume, providing a strong signal for the titanium scrap market. The 787 Dreamliner, which contains about 15% titanium compared to 6% for the 737 MAX, will also contribute to increased demand. Despite facing parts shortages earlier in 2024, Boeing has indicated that it will resolve these issues by the end of the year, paving the way for normalized production rates in 2025.

Titanium Melters’ Expansions and Ingot Production

Another key factor influencing the titanium scrap market is the expansion of titanium melters’ capacity. With new ingot production facilities scheduled to come online in 2025, there is a clear indication that titanium melters will be looking to source more aerospace-grade scrap to feed their new furnaces. Companies such as ATI, Titanium Metals (TIMET), and Perryman are investing heavily in capacity expansions to meet growing demand for titanium products.

ATI’s expansion at its Richland, Washington, operations will increase melting capacity by 35% over 2022 levels, while TIMET’s new plant in Ravenswood, West Virginia, is expected to produce 33 million lbs of ingot annually once fully operational. Perryman, meanwhile, is ramping up its facility in Coal Center, Pennsylvania, increasing its melting capacity by 16 million lbs to 42 million lbs annually. These expansions are expected to create more competition for available titanium scrap, potentially driving up prices.

Impact of Tariffs and Political Uncertainty

However, the market remains uncertain due to potential changes in U.S. trade policies under President-elect Donald Trump. Trump’s proposed tariffs, which could impose duties of up to 60% on imports from China, 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada, and a 20% duty on all other imports, have raised concerns among market participants. Such tariffs would increase the cost of titanium scrap imports, particularly from regions like Europe and Japan, which could be devastating for the industry if they are implemented.

Titanium scrap imports to the U.S. have already increased significantly in 2024, reaching 23,578 metric tonnes through October, surpassing the previous year’s total. While the threat of tariffs remains uncertain, it could create additional market disruptions that would further complicate the scrap supply chain.

Conclusion

While 2024 proved to be a challenging year for the titanium scrap market, 2025 is shaping up to bring a significant rebound. The resumption of Boeing's production and continued expansions in titanium melting capacity should drive stronger demand for aerospace-grade scrap. However, political uncertainty surrounding tariff policies remains a major wildcard that could affect the broader market dynamics. As the industry braces for these changes, stakeholders are carefully watching for signs of recovery and growth.

Airbus Titanium Procurement Pull-Forward Aims to Prevent 2027 Supply Chain Shock

Airbus

Airbus titanium procurement is being pulled forward into 2026 as the aircraft manufacturer tries to avoid a sharp demand surge across the titanium supply chain in 2027. The decision reflects a more cautious approach to supplier visibility after Airbus previously reduced its 2026 titanium demand forecast to lower inventories.

The earlier correction may have gone too far. Airbus now sees a risk that lower 2026 buying could create a bullwhip effect when airframe demand rises sharply next year. By shifting some volumes into 2026, the company aims to smooth purchases and reduce pressure on melters, forgers, mills and downstream aerospace suppliers.

Airbus titanium procurement is closely linked to the A350 production ramp. The A350 is Airbus’ highest titanium-bearing platform, with titanium representing around 15% of aircraft weight. Higher build rates and a shift toward the larger A350-1000 variant will increase material requirements.

Airbus expects 2027 titanium demand to be roughly 30% higher than it expected one year ago. Pulling volumes into 2026 means 2027 demand should still rise from 2025, but remain below 2024 levels.

A350 Ramp-Up Drives Titanium Visibility Needs

The A350 production outlook is the main driver behind Airbus’ revised titanium strategy. Airbus is currently producing seven A350 aircraft a month, after ending 2025 at a rate of five to six a month.

The company plans to reach 10 A350s a month in 2027 and 12 a month in 2028. This production ramp will require more titanium across airframe structures, especially as customer demand shifts toward the larger A350-1000.

The A350-1000 carries a larger material requirement than the A350-900. A production mix weighted more heavily toward the larger variant will therefore increase titanium demand even if headline aircraft output rises gradually.

This is important for the titanium supply chain because aerospace titanium does not move like ordinary industrial metal. Qualified melt, billet, plate, bar, sheet and forged products require long lead times, strict certifications and controlled production routes.

Airbus’ forecast covers only airframe demand. It excludes titanium used in engines, landing gear and other equipment. This means the total aerospace titanium requirement could be higher once engine-makers and equipment suppliers are included.

The decision to bring demand into 2026 also gives suppliers a steadier signal. Aerospace suppliers need visibility to plan sponge, scrap, melt capacity, forging schedules, machining slots and qualification-controlled inventory.

Airbus works on a nine-month firm order placement basis. The company said the demand adjustment was already communicated to the market, although producer responses appear mixed.

One titanium producer said it had not yet seen additional demand linked to Airbus for 2026. Others expect higher titanium requirements from melters and original equipment manufacturers in the second half of the year.

That timing matters. If procurement signals reach upstream suppliers too late, the supply chain may still face bottlenecks in 2027. Titanium capacity exists, but qualified aerospace material availability can tighten quickly when aircraft production accelerates.

Titanium Supply Chain Faces Ramp-Up and Delivery Timing Risk

Airbus’ move highlights the sensitivity of aerospace supply chains after several years of disruption, inventory corrections and uneven delivery schedules. Aircraft demand remains strong, but material flows must match real production rates rather than short-term delivery numbers.

Airbus delivered nine A350s in January-March, implying a rate of three aircraft a month. However, the company said production is already running at seven a month, with deliveries affected by customer rescheduling and downstream part constraints.

This distinction matters for titanium demand. Material consumption follows production activity earlier in the manufacturing cycle, not only final customer deliveries. If industrial output is already at seven A350s a month, titanium requirements can rise before delivery data fully reflect the ramp.

Airbus is also dealing with supply difficulties in some downstream parts fitted late in the assembly sequence. These bottlenecks can delay aircraft handovers while upstream airframe production continues.

For titanium producers, this creates a planning challenge. Final delivery numbers may understate actual material pull if work-in-progress aircraft are moving through the industrial system.

The bullwhip risk comes from this mismatch. If Airbus reduces procurement too much during inventory normalisation, suppliers may cut capacity assumptions. When aircraft demand then accelerates, the supply chain can face a sudden order surge.

That surge can affect sponge buyers, scrap processors, vacuum arc remelters, alloy producers, rolling mills, forgers and machine shops. Aerospace titanium supply is especially vulnerable because customers cannot easily switch to unqualified material or non-approved sources.

The pull-forward strategy is therefore less about buying excess metal and more about stabilising the production curve. Airbus wants suppliers to see a smoother demand profile before the A350 ramp tightens the market.

The titanium market has been uneven. Standard-quality titanium demand has been pressured by aircraft inventory drawdowns, while premium-quality material for engine and high-specification applications has remained stronger.

Airbus’ revised approach could support confidence in airframe titanium demand. It may also reduce the risk that suppliers face a sudden 2027 spike after a weak 2026 procurement period.

The effect will depend on how quickly orders move through the supply chain. If melters and forgers receive stronger demand in the second half of 2026, the market could enter 2027 with better visibility and less disruption.

For aerospace manufacturers, the message is clear. Build-rate recovery requires more than aircraft orders. It requires coordinated material planning across titanium, aluminium, nickel alloys, forgings, castings, fasteners and machined components.

For titanium suppliers, the opportunity is also clear. Companies with qualified capacity, reliable lead times and strong Airbus exposure may benefit from a more stable procurement profile as the A350 ramp progresses.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Airbus titanium procurement pull-forward shows that aerospace supply chains are still vulnerable to planning shocks. The A350 ramp will reward suppliers with qualified titanium capacity, but only if demand signals reach the market early enough to prevent another bottleneck cycle.

Beneath the Growth: Ferro-Titanium(Fe-Ti) Market Enters Cooling Phase in 2025

Ferro-Titanium

Once a core beneficiary of aerospace and specialty steel demand, ferro-titanium now faces dual pressure from weakening demand and excess supply.

At the Foundation of Steel, Cracks Begin to Show

As of September 2025, leading market analysts still forecast a 4–5% annual growth rate for the ferro-titanium market, citing robust demand in aerospace, high-performance steels, and defense-grade alloys. But on the ground, reality paints a more sobering picture.

The global steel industry is struggling. A perfect storm of China’s low-cost exports, persistent weakness in downstream sectors, and U.S. tariff uncertainties has significantly dented confidence. Particularly hard hit are the automotive, shipbuilding, and plant engineering sectors, leading to a sharp decline in ferro-titanium consumption.

The result: a continued slide in spot prices, leaving suppliers grappling with margin pressure and inventory overhang.

Dual Shock: Demand Contraction Meets Supply Glut

Ferro-titanium is a specialty ferroalloy additive used in steelmaking to remove oxygen and nitrogen impurities, refine grain structure, and enhance both strength and corrosion resistance. It is indispensable in the production of titanium alloys for aerospace, stainless steels, and corrosion-resistant superalloys.

However, softening demand is now converging with a surge in cheap ilmenite and rutile feedstock imports, the ramp-up of new smelting capacity, and rising inventories, triggering a classic oversupply scenario. Some traders have resorted to panic selling, driving spot prices below long-term contract levels.

Not All Ferroalloys Are Created Equal

This downturn is not symptomatic of the entire ferroalloy market. While ferro-molybdenum (FeMo) prices are also under pressure due to steel sector weakness, the ferro-vanadium (FeV) market remains relatively buoyant—buoyed by growing demand for high-strength steel and new applications in energy storage technologies (e.g., vanadium redox flow batteries).

This divergence underscores a key truth:

Ferroalloy markets live or die by the uniqueness of their end-use demand.

Products that rely solely on steel cycles are inherently more volatile. In contrast, those with diverse, high-value downstream applications offer resilience—and in some cases, opportunity.

Long-Term Vision Intact, But Short-Term Survival Comes First

Industry experts agree:

"A meaningful rebound in ferro-titanium prices is unlikely until inventories normalize and downstream sectors recover."

Yet the long-term fundamentals remain intact. Demand from aerospace, defense-related high-performance steels, urban air mobility (UAM), and electric vehicles continues to build. Today’s correction may in fact be a strategic inflection point.

For producers with technological capabilities and diversified market access, this downturn could be a launchpad for future leadership. Moreover, as environmental regulations tighten, ferro-titanium producers with recycling-based production systems may gain a structural edge. In the long run, quality will matter more than quantity.

After all, ferro-titanium is essential for manufacturing materials that must not fail—only the strongest will do.

The Metalnomist Commentary

“This is not chaos. It is purification. Only the technologically armed will dominate the next cycle.”

The ferro-titanium market is undergoing a painful but necessary correction. But there is method in the madness. Suppliers rooted in high-value end markets, with a reputation for premium quality and the ability to serve global niches, will emerge as the next leaders.

This is a time for endurance. And in metals, quality is always the final destination.

Osaka Titanium Export Sales Target 15% Growth Despite Market Headwinds

Osaka Titanium

Osaka Titanium export performance targets significant improvement with projected sales rising 15% to ¥37.7 billion for fiscal 2026. The Japanese titanium producer's Osaka Titanium export strategy focuses on aerospace sector demand, particularly from European aircraft manufacturer Airbus, as the company seeks to offset domestic market weakness and Boeing-related disruptions.

Aerospace Demand Drives Export Optimism

Osaka Titanium export revenues benefit from sustained aerospace industry requirements across multiple segments. Titanium sponge demand from Airbus remains robust, supporting the company's international sales projections for the current fiscal year. Additionally, maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services for aircraft engines continue generating strong titanium product demand.

Meanwhile, export sales represent approximately 86% of Osaka Titanium's total titanium business revenues. This heavy international focus positions the company to capitalize on global aerospace recovery trends while reducing dependence on volatile domestic markets. However, the company maintains confidentiality regarding actual export volume data.

Boeing Disruptions Impact Previous Performance

Nevertheless, Osaka Titanium faced challenges in the previous fiscal year ending March 2025. Export sales declined 4% year-on-year to ¥33.5 billion ($231 million), primarily due to operational disruptions at Boeing facilities. A seven-week strike at Boeing's Washington factories significantly impacted titanium demand throughout 2024.

Therefore, the company's current optimism reflects expectations that aerospace sector recovery will overcome lingering Boeing-related headwinds. Osaka Titanium sources raw materials from diversified global suppliers including Canada, Australia, India, and African nations, providing supply chain flexibility for international operations.

Pricing Pressures Challenge Revenue Projections

However, potential pricing adjustments could affect Osaka Titanium export revenue targets despite volume growth expectations. Company representatives indicated possible titanium product price reductions for export markets, driven by declining raw material costs and titanium ore price index movements. These pricing pressures suggest potential downward revisions to sales outlook projections.

Furthermore, domestic titanium sales face significant headwinds with overall revenues projected to decline 3% to ¥43.9 billion. Weak domestic demand for ordinary industrial applications and ongoing inventory adjustments weigh heavily on the Japanese titanium market, reinforcing the strategic importance of export growth.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Osaka Titanium's export-focused strategy exemplifies how specialized metals producers navigate market volatility through geographic diversification and aerospace sector positioning. While Boeing's operational challenges created near-term disruptions, the company's emphasis on European aerospace partnerships and MRO services demonstrates strategic adaptation to evolving industry dynamics in the critical titanium supply chain.

Pangang Vanadium Output Fell as Titanium Dioxide Production Rose in 2025

Pangang Group

Pangang vanadium output declined slightly in 2025 as weak prices and oversupply continued to pressure China’s vanadium market. Pangang Group Vanadium and Titanium Resources, China’s largest vanadium producer, cut production by 0.4% on the year to 53,100t of vanadium pentoxide equivalent.

The lower Pangang vanadium output reflected a market still struggling to absorb available supply. China’s vanadium consumption increased in steel and vanadium redox flow batteries, but demand growth was not strong enough to remove the surplus.

Pangang’s overall revenue fell by 33% on the year to 8.89bn yuan, or about $1.29bn, as lower prices for both vanadium and titanium products reduced earnings momentum. The result shows how exposed integrated titanium-vanadium producers remain to price cycles across multiple industrial materials.

Vanadium Surplus Weighed on Prices Despite Battery Demand Growth

China’s vanadium market remained oversupplied in 2025 even though steel consumption and vanadium redox flow battery demand both increased. This limited the pricing benefit from battery-sector growth and kept pressure on producers.

Vanadium remains closely linked to the steel industry, where it is used to improve strength and performance in rebar and specialty steels. Battery demand is strategically important, but it has not yet become large enough to fully offset weakness or oversupply in the traditional steel-linked market.

The slight decline in Pangang vanadium output therefore signals production discipline rather than a structural shift away from vanadium. Producers are still waiting for stronger demand from energy storage to translate into tighter market fundamentals.

Titanium Dioxide Output Rose as Margins Remained Under Pressure

Pangang increased titanium dioxide production by 7.7% on the year to 272,500t in 2025. This included 69,200t produced through the chlorination process, which is typically used for higher-quality titanium dioxide products.

The company also produced 199,500t of sulphate titanium slag, up 9.8% from the previous year. Pangang has 1.8mn t/yr of titanium concentrate capacity, 220,000 t/yr of titanium slag capacity and 300,000 t/yr of titanium dioxide capacity, including 75,000 t/yr through chlorination.

China’s titanium dioxide sector remained difficult despite Pangang’s output growth. Domestic titanium dioxide output edged lower, feedstock titanium concentrate and sulphuric acid prices stayed elevated, and overseas anti-dumping measures weakened exports.

These pressures intensified competition and squeezed margins across the titanium dioxide industry. Pangang’s higher production therefore came against a challenging pricing and cost environment, not a broad market recovery.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Pangang’s 2025 results show that scale alone does not protect producers from weak vanadium and titanium pricing. The key question is whether battery storage demand and higher-value chlorination titanium dioxide can eventually offset oversupply and margin pressure in China’s mature industrial markets.

China Titanium Forging Project Marks a New Step in Downstream Capacity Growth

Sichuan Panjin

China titanium forging project development is entering a new phase as Sichuan Panjin moves toward first-phase start-up in Xichang. The company has completed construction of the initial 20,000 t/yr phase. It has also commissioned the vacuum consumable arc furnace and finished hot load testing. As a result, commercial operations could begin as early as March after final ramp-up work.

The project matters because it strengthens downstream titanium alloy processing, not just primary material supply. Sichuan Panjin will use titanium sponge from Pangang as feedstock. It will focus on titanium alloy melting and forging for higher-value industrial applications. Therefore, the China titanium forging project supports a broader shift from raw material output to processed titanium products.

This move also fits a wider industrial trend in China’s titanium sector. Producers increasingly want more control over conversion, quality, and regional supply chains. High-specification titanium alloys now matter more for aerospace, chemical processing, and new energy demand. Consequently, new forging capacity carries both industrial and strategic value.

Sichuan Panjin Titanium Alloys Project Expands Regional Processing Depth

Sichuan Panjin titanium alloys capacity is designed to close a long-standing processing gap in Liangshan’s vanadium-titanium industry. The project adds local melting and forging capability to an area known more for upstream resources. That improves industrial depth within western China. Meanwhile, it may reduce reliance on outside processors for downstream titanium conversion.

The first phase alone will add meaningful capacity to the regional market. Once fully ramped, it will provide 20,000 t/yr of titanium and titanium alloy melting and forging capability. The second phase is scheduled to begin in the second half of this year. It is targeted for completion in 2027. Therefore, the full project could become a sizeable new pillar in western China titanium supply.

Ownership structure also gives the project industrial weight. Sichuan Panjin is a joint venture between Pangang Xichang Xingangye and Henan Zhongyuan Titanium. Zhongyuan Titanium, controlled by stainless steel producer Yongjin, holds a 66pc stake. That combination links upstream feedstock access with downstream alloy processing ambition.

Western China Titanium Supply Could Gain More Strategic Relevance

Western China titanium supply could become more competitive as this project moves into production. Market participants expect the new facility to strengthen supply for high-specification titanium alloys. Those grades are increasingly important in aerospace, chemical equipment, and emerging energy systems. As a result, the plant may improve regional responsiveness to higher-end demand.

The project’s scale also signals a value-upgrading strategy rather than a simple capacity addition. Once both phases are completed, total capacity will reach 40,000 t/yr. Annual output value could rise to as much as Yn3bn. That suggests the company is targeting margin improvement through deeper processing and product quality.

For the broader titanium market, this is a notable development. New sponge capacity alone does not create a complete supply chain. Melting, forging, and alloy qualification determine real commercial value. Therefore, the China titanium forging project reflects a more mature stage of industrial expansion.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This project shows how China’s titanium sector is pushing further downstream to capture more value. Capacity growth now matters most where it improves processing depth and alloy quality. If execution stays on track, western China could gain a stronger role in premium titanium supply.

 

China Aerospace-Grade Titanium Sponge Exports Set to Rise as OEMs Diversify Supply

China Aerospace-Grade Titanium Sponge

China aerospace-grade titanium sponge exports are expected to rise over the next five years as western aerospace supply chains look for additional qualified raw material sources. Chinese producer Chaoyang Jinda Titanium expects international shipments of qualified aerospace-grade sponge to increase from around 1,000t this year to 10,000t by 2030.

The shift reflects a deeper change in the aerospace titanium supply chain. Western aircraft manufacturers and ingot melters are trying to reduce exposure to Russian supply, while aircraft build rates are expected to rise from 2027.

China aerospace-grade titanium sponge is therefore moving from a limited export niche into a potential supply-chain balancing tool. However, tariffs, qualification risk and geopolitical uncertainty will limit how quickly US and European buyers adopt Chinese material.

The opportunity is strongest in standard-quality structural titanium grades. Premium-quality sponge for engine, landing-gear and other critical applications is likely to remain controlled by established suppliers with long qualification histories.

Western Aerospace Buyers Face a Supply-Diversification Challenge

Aerospace-grade sponge demand is expected to recover from 2027 after a weaker 2026 caused by inventory normalisation. Mills have been reducing stocks of semi-finished titanium parts and raw materials, but aircraft production plans point to higher requirements later in the decade.

The timing is important. Airbus and Boeing both carry long aircraft backlogs, creating a decade of production visibility. This forces mills and original equipment manufacturers to look beyond short-term demand swings and secure raw material sources for future build-rate increases.

Western OEMs also continue to reassess Russian titanium exposure. If procurement from Russia declines, the market will need alternative aerospace-qualified sponge to fill the gap. Japan’s Toho Titanium and Osaka Titanium are expanding, while China is preparing to supply more qualified material.

Global approved aerospace-grade sponge supply excluding Russian products is expected to rise from about 74,000t this year to around 91,000t by 2030. Demand is expected to grow at a similar pace, leaving the market sensitive to which suppliers are included in purchasing programmes.

The supply-demand picture changes significantly depending on China and Russia. Excluding both suppliers creates a tighter market. Including them creates more apparent supply availability. This makes qualification and geopolitical acceptability just as important as physical capacity.

Some US ingot producers began qualifying Chinese titanium sponge in 2024. US imports from China rose to a 10-year high of 1,069t that year, showing that buyers were willing to test Chinese material when diversification pressure increased.

However, imports fell to 155t last year and no Chinese sponge imports were reported in January-February 2026. Tariff volatility, high mill inventories and policy uncertainty discouraged further purchasing.

This shows the main barrier for China aerospace-grade titanium sponge. Aerospace qualification requires multi-year commitments, stable documentation, repeatable quality and customer confidence. Buyers will not qualify a new source quickly if they fear trade rules could change again.

Titanium is exempt from the latest 10% US tariff, and overall duties have fallen back to 40% from 60%. But the rate itself is not the only issue. For aerospace buyers, volatility can be more damaging than the actual tariff level.

A mill can absorb or price a known tariff. It cannot easily build a long-term qualification strategy around unpredictable policy. This is why US buyers may limit Chinese sponge procurement to 15-20% of requirements, even if the material is technically acceptable.

Europe and Asia-Pacific may offer more immediate export channels. China already supplies aerospace-grade sponge to buyers in those regions, supporting shipments even when US demand is limited.

Capacity Expansion Could Change the Titanium Sponge Balance

China is preparing a large wave of aerospace-grade sponge capacity additions. Several major projects are scheduled to come on line soon, with combined new capacity of around 110,000 t/yr.

The scale is unprecedented. The planned additions exceed the combined existing capacity of Japan’s Toho and Osaka Titanium, Kazakhstan’s Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant, and Saudi Arabia’s ATTM.

China’s expansion is driven by two demand streams. Domestic aerospace demand is rising from the Comac C919 programme and military aircraft production. At the same time, producers expect higher export demand as western OEMs diversify away from Russia.

China’s titanium mill product demand already has a meaningful aerospace base. Aerospace applications accounted for about 20% of China’s titanium mill product demand in 2025, or roughly 31,280t. The chemicals industry remained the largest segment at 48%.

The domestic base gives Chinese sponge producers a stronger platform for quality improvement. Aerospace production experience matters because sponge qualification depends on consistency over time, not only nameplate capacity.

Still, some market participants question whether all new capacity can secure international aerospace qualification. New lines may need years of operating history before western melters and OEMs accept material for aircraft applications.

This is a critical distinction. China may have large physical capacity, but aerospace supply depends on approved, audited and repeatable production. Capacity alone does not guarantee market access.

Price competitiveness may support adoption. Domestic China aerospace-grade sponge prices have recently held firm at 55,000-57,000 yuan/t ex-works because of cost pressure. That remains competitive against some western supply routes, especially if buyers need alternative non-Russian material.

However, qualification is likely to split the market by application. Standard structural titanium grades are more likely to accept Chinese sponge over time. These grades support airframes and less critical structural components where qualification remains strict but less restrictive than engine-grade applications.

Premium-quality sponge will be harder to penetrate. Engine, landing-gear and other demanding aerospace uses require deeper qualification, tighter chemistry control and stronger confidence from prime contractors and tier suppliers.

Airbus’ titanium demand outlook adds another layer. The A350 is a high titanium-bearing platform, with titanium representing around 15% of aircraft weight. As A350 production rises toward 2027 and 2028, titanium demand visibility should improve across the supply chain.

That demand pull could make Chinese material more attractive if western supply tightens. But buyers will still balance cost, qualification, geopolitics and supply security.

For Chinese producers, the path is clear but difficult. They must prove consistent aerospace-grade quality, build long-term customer trust, manage export documentation and navigate trade policy risk.

For western OEMs, the decision is strategic. China aerospace-grade titanium sponge could reduce Russia exposure and improve supply flexibility. But it also introduces another geopolitical dependency at a time when aerospace and defence supply chains are under closer scrutiny.

The most likely outcome is partial adoption. Chinese sponge may become a growing supplement for standard-quality structural grades, while established Japanese, Kazakh, Saudi and other qualified suppliers remain central to premium aerospace applications.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China aerospace-grade titanium sponge will become harder for western aerospace supply chains to ignore as aircraft build rates rise and Russian exposure narrows. The decisive issue is not capacity, but whether Chinese producers can convert new output into trusted, qualified and politically acceptable supply.

TiVac ferro-titanium liquidation reshapes UK titanium scrap and alloy supply

TiVac

TiVac ferro-titanium liquidation marks a major shift in UK ferro-titanium production and scrap demand. The TiVac ferro-titanium liquidation follows months of weak prices and high power costs that crushed already thin margins. As a result, the TiVac ferro-titanium liquidation will tighten local alloy supply while forcing scrap dealers to rethink export strategies.

TiVac ferro-titanium liquidation driven by power costs and weak prices

TiVac shut its Sheffield ferro-titanium operations because the UK cost base became unsustainable. Electricity costs stayed high while ferro-titanium prices slid toward five-year lows, leaving many contracts barely profitable. The company had nameplate capacity of 1,500 t/month, but operated closer to 500–600 t/month recently.

The TiVac ferro-titanium liquidation now triggers a full wind-down of production and scrap processing. All buildings, furnaces, crushers, equipment and land will be sold as part of the dissolution process. This closes two key Sheffield sites at Oakes Green and Blackburn Road, both long-standing hubs for processing titanium scrap into ferro-titanium.

TiVac operated under a conversion model for major traders and alloy specialists. It processed scrap and produced ferro-titanium for FE Mottram (now fully under Metraco), Metals and Alloys International, and Westbrook Light Alloys. However, this model could not withstand prolonged low prices and high UK input costs.

Supply shifts to Estonia as UK scrap faces pressure

Market logistics will now pivot as Metraco rebalances its ferro-titanium footprint. The group plans to rely on its Ti Q plant in Ahtme, Estonia, which has 600 t/month nameplate capacity and can expand further using a second furnace. Long-term UK contracts will first draw on inventory and then transition gradually to Estonian output.

Westbrook has also moved to protect its customer base during the TiVac ferro-titanium liquidation. The company expects to meet its long-term obligations from existing stock while it evaluates strategic options. Meanwhile, idle capacity at other European producers should absorb most of the lost TiVac volume, limiting short-term price impact.

The biggest immediate shock from the TiVac ferro-titanium liquidation will hit the UK titanium scrap market. TiVac’s disappearance removes a significant local buyer of titanium scrap, especially revert and offcuts suitable for FeTi production. If dealers hesitate to export to the EU because of added logistics and paperwork, domestic UK scrap prices could face downward pressure.

The closure also reshapes the UK ferro-titanium landscape. Sheffield-based Transition Metals now becomes the sole domestic producer of ferro-titanium in the UK. However, overall regional supply will remain balanced in the near term, because inventory and spare capacity at other European plants can cover reduced UK output. The longer-term question is whether UK-based ferro-titanium production can remain viable without structural relief on power and operating costs.

The Metalnomist Commentary

TiVac’s liquidation highlights how energy costs and weak alloy prices can quickly erode Europe’s titanium recycling base. For mills and superalloy buyers, supply will likely remain secure, but more material will flow through continental hubs rather than UK converters. For titanium scrap generators, the real challenge now is finding efficient export routes and maintaining value in a softer domestic market.

EU Ferro-Titanium Imports Fell to 2009 Low After Russian Ban

Ferro-Titanium

EU ferro-titanium imports fell to their lowest level since 2009 in 2025 after sanctions blocked Russian material from entering the bloc directly or through Baltic transit routes. EU countries imported 30,171t of ferro-titanium last year, down 36% from 47,296t in 2024.

The sharp decline showed how deeply the European ferro-titanium market had depended on Russian supply and Baltic logistics. Estonia, Poland, and Latvia together accounted for 12,830t of EU supply, but the structure of that supply changed significantly once Russian-origin ferro-titanium was barred.

EU ferro-titanium imports from Estonia halved on the year to 6,384t. The decline suggests that Estonian flows now more closely reflect local production rather than Russian material transiting through the country.

Sanctions Shifted Supply Toward Estonia, Poland and India

Estonia remained the EU’s largest ferro-titanium supplier in 2025, while Poland became the second-largest intra-EU source. Polish shipments rose by a quarter to 3,834t, showing that European buyers were turning more heavily to regional producers after the Russian ban.

Imports from the UK fell 27% to 3,468t after the closure of TiVac last summer. Most of TiVac’s former volumes are expected to shift to Estonia, where FE Mottram is scaling up operations in Ahtme, while Transition Metals continues to operate in the UK.

India became a larger alternative supplier as exports to the EU rose 171% to 2,310t. Turkey’s shipments also surged to 1,000t, although these flows remain unclear because Turkey is not a known ferro-titanium producer.

Russian ferro-titanium imports fell to just 463t in 2025 after full implementation of EU sanctions on Russian ferro-alloys in December 2024. Russian exports largely moved to Asia, with Chinese imports from Russia reaching a record 6,381t last year.

Russian Scrap Flows Rose Before Late-Year Slowdown

Titanium scrap became a temporary workaround because Russian titanium scrap was not covered by EU sanctions. EU imports of Russian scrap doubled to 2,517t in 2025, with 2,406t entering Estonia.

Estonia then re-exported 2,277t of titanium scrap last year, showing how scrap flows supported the regional ferro-titanium supply chain after the ban on Russian ferro-alloys. However, this trade also weakened sharply toward year-end, with EU imports falling to 36t in December and 37t in January 2026.

European ferro-titanium prices averaged $4.98-5.33/kg Ti dp/df Rotterdam in 2025, down 28% from 2024. Weak steel mill consumption kept prices under pressure for most of the year.

The market later rebounded from multi-year lows in December. Supply concerns linked to Latvian producer LLR-Ecotech first supported the recovery, before higher scrap costs allowed other producers to raise offers.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU ferro-titanium market is now being rebuilt around sanctions compliance, regional production, and scrap availability. The Russian ban reduced headline imports, but it also exposed Europe’s dependence on flexible titanium scrap flows and a small group of regional producers.

Pratt & Whitney Titanium Certification Strengthens Sierra Sheet & Plate’s Aerospace Position

Pratt & Whitney MRO

Pratt & Whitney titanium certification has expanded STS Metals’ qualified supply base after the engine-maker approved Sierra Sheet & Plate’s flat-rolled titanium products for end-use applications. The certification allows purchase orders to go directly to Sierra Sheet & Plate, helping suppliers reduce lead times and procurement complexity.

The approval gives Sierra Sheet & Plate a clearer route into Pratt & Whitney’s aerospace supply chain. It also places the company alongside STS Metals’ Sierra Alloys and TSI Titanium as qualified titanium sources for the engine manufacturer.

Pratt & Whitney titanium certification matters because aerospace titanium qualification is difficult, costly and strategically important. Certified suppliers can support engine and airframe programs where material traceability, mechanical performance, heat treatment and surface quality must meet strict requirements.

Sierra Sheet & Plate Expands Qualified Titanium Supply

Sierra Sheet & Plate produces hot-rolled titanium plate and sheet in several titanium alloys, including 6Al-4V and 6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo. These alloys are widely used in aerospace because they offer high strength, corrosion resistance and strong performance at demanding operating conditions.

The company also provides heat-treating, cutting and surface-finishing services. This gives buyers access to more complete processing capability, not only raw flat-rolled titanium material.

The MCL-LCS certification should improve procurement efficiency for Pratt & Whitney suppliers. Direct ordering can reduce unnecessary sourcing steps and help shorten delivery timelines in a market where aerospace material availability remains a recurring concern.

Aerospace Titanium Qualification Remains a Supply Chain Advantage

Pratt & Whitney titanium certification gives Sierra Sheet & Plate stronger credibility in the aerospace materials market. Engine supply chains require qualified sources that can meet repeatable quality standards and support long-term production schedules.

The certification also reinforces STS Metals’ broader titanium platform. With Sierra Alloys, TSI Titanium and Sierra Sheet & Plate now positioned as qualified titanium sources, the group can support multiple forms and processing routes within the aerospace titanium chain.

For titanium suppliers, qualification remains one of the strongest competitive barriers. As engine production and aftermarket demand continue to pressure aerospace supply chains, approved titanium plate, sheet and alloy sources will remain strategically valuable.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Pratt & Whitney’s approval shows that aerospace titanium supply is not only about capacity, but qualification. Sierra Sheet & Plate’s certification strengthens STS Metals’ position in a market where lead time, traceability and approved-source status directly influence competitiveness.

China's Titanium Sponge Production to See Significant Expansion Amid Demand Growth

China's Titanium Sponge

China's titanium sponge production capacity is set to experience a major boost, potentially reaching between 300,000 and 500,000 tonnes per year over the next three to five years, according to An Zhongsheng, secretary-general of the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association's titanium zirconium and hafnium branch (CNIA-Ti). This expansion is expected to be driven by increased demand across various sectors including aerospace, marine engineering, chemical production, computer, communication and consumer electronics (3C), daily necessities, and air conditioning, as reported at the China and CIS Titanium Industry Development Forum held in Xi'an, Shaanxi province.

Global civil aviation demand, recovering from the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, has put strain on aviation-grade titanium sponge supplies. An emphasized that while the aerospace industry is recovering, industrial sectors are propelling China's titanium market with consistent growth in recent years.

Currently, China's titanium sponge production capacity hovers around 300,000 tonnes per year. In the broader market, titanium's growing use in civilian products is anticipated to be a significant growth catalyst for the Chinese titanium industry.

Although global demand for titanium in the medical industry has surged, Chinese demand in this sector has been hampered by healthcare reforms promoting the use of cost-effective materials. Despite this, prices for titanium sponge are projected to remain relatively stable, enhancing its appeal across a range of applications. An Zhongsheng reassured industry stakeholders that China’s domestic supply of titanium sponge will meet future demands due to planned capacity expansions.

The anticipated rapid growth in titanium sponge production marks a transition for titanium from a rare metal to a more commonly used material, according to An. In the first half of this year, China produced 123,500 tonnes of titanium sponge, according to CNIA-Ti data.

Nevertheless, China continues to rely on imports for approximately 35-40% of its titanium ores and concentrates, reflecting its position in the global supply chain. Last year, global production of titanium ore and concentrate amounted to 8.75 million tonnes (t) of titanium dioxide equivalent, with China contributing 37%, followed by Mozambique (18%), South Africa (11%), and Canada (6%).

In the realm of titanium dioxide production, China led with 55% of global output in 2023, maintaining growth through domestic capacity expansions. Additionally, the world's titanium sponge production rose by 29% to 347,000 tonnes in 2023, with China’s output surging from a 25% share in 2022 to a dominant 63%. Russia, Japan, and Saudi Arabia also witnessed increases in their titanium sponge output, while Ukraine reported zero production.

For titanium mill products, global production in 2023 reached 248,000 tonnes, with China accounting for a commanding 64%, trailed by the United States (14%), Russia (13%), Japan (6%), and Europe (3%).

FE Mottram Ferro-Titanium Expansion Strengthens Baltic Scrap Processing Capacity

Mottram

FE Mottram ferro-titanium expansion is moving into a more important phase in Estonia. The company is installing titanium turnings roasters and ferro-titanium crushers sourced from the former TiVac facility in the UK. This equipment will strengthen titanium scrap processing and improve product preparation at its Ahtme plant. As a result, FE Mottram ferro-titanium expansion is becoming a meaningful development in the Baltic ferro-titanium market.

The first milestone is already complete. Mottram said the turnings roaster has been commissioned and fully tested. That unit removes oil contamination from titanium turnings before melting. Therefore, the new line should improve feed preparation and widen the plant’s scrap handling flexibility.

This matters because scrap quality directly affects melting efficiency and alloy consistency. The roaster also complements Mottram’s existing wash line, which is a more specialized and costly method for higher-grade scrap. Consequently, FE Mottram ferro-titanium expansion gives the company a more practical processing mix for different scrap streams.

Titanium Scrap Processing Gets More Flexible With New Roaster and Crushers

Titanium scrap processing is gaining more flexibility through the new equipment package. One additional crusher is already installed and operating, while two more are nearing commissioning. These crushers can size ferro-titanium into specific fractions such as 10-50mm lumps or 0-2mm powder. As a result, Mottram can improve product customization for different customer requirements.

The company is also benefiting from operational continuity with former TiVac expertise. Former TiVac director Richard Matthewman is advising Mottram in Estonia on scrap processing and ferro-titanium melting. That support matters because equipment transfer alone does not guarantee a smooth scale-up. Therefore, experience and technical know-how are helping reduce execution risk.

The project is not fully complete yet. Installation work has paused temporarily while UK technical specialists return home for a scheduled break. However, Mottram still expects all UK equipment to be fully installed and operational in early March. Meanwhile, that timeline suggests the company remains broadly on track.

FE Mottram Ferro-Titanium Expansion Could Lift Plant Readiness Beyond Current Capacity

FE Mottram ferro-titanium expansion also includes a broader capacity option. The Ahtme plant currently has nameplate capacity of 600 t/month. Mottram plans to commission an additional furnace transferred from the former Mottram/TiVac site at Oakes Green in May-June. That furnace could approximately double plant capacity if fully used.

However, the company’s current strategy is more cautious than aggressive. Mottram plans to reserve the extra furnace as a backup rather than immediately use it as primary expansion capacity. That decision suggests management is prioritizing reliability and operational security. As a result, FE Mottram ferro-titanium expansion looks disciplined rather than speculative.

This approach may prove commercially smart. In ferro-titanium and titanium scrap processing, equipment resilience can matter as much as maximum throughput. A backup furnace gives the plant more flexibility during maintenance, disruptions, or shifts in feedstock quality. Therefore, the company is building a stronger operating platform, not only chasing volume growth.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This project matters because it combines equipment transfer, technical continuity, and cautious capacity planning in one move. FE Mottram is not simply adding machinery. It is building a more flexible titanium scrap processing base that could strengthen its position in the regional ferro-titanium market.

Enduring Reliance Amid Sanctions: Europe’s Russian Titanium Dilemma

VSMPO Titanium

Introduction: A Supply Chain Unbroken in Wartime

Despite sweeping economic sanctions imposed by the West following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, one supply chain has proved remarkably resilient: Russian titanium sponge. Europe’s quandary over this advanced material—indispensable to aerospace, defense, and medical-device manufacturing—has only deepened.

Russia’s Command of Titanium

Russia ranks among the world’s largest titanium producers. VSMPO-AVISMA, the country’s flagship producer, accounts for 90% of Russia’s titanium output and exports to some 50 countries. The company is estimated to control up to 30% of the global titanium market and nearly half of aerospace-grade supply.

Russia’s dominance rests on abundant raw-material reserves and comparatively low energy costs. Because titanium smelting is energy-intensive, commercial viability depends on cheap power and gas—conditions Russia has historically met.

Airbus A380

Trade that Continues Despite Sanctions

On 7 March 2022, Boeing announced it would halt purchases of Russian titanium used in aircraft manufacturing. Rolls-Royce and Boeing subsequently suspended procurement from VSMPO-AVISMA indefinitely.

Europe, however, charted a different course. Airbus urged the European Union to keep Russian titanium outside future sanctions packages. As Airbus chief executive Guillaume Faury argued, titanium represents a small share of Russia’s total exports, so sanctions would inflict little pain on Moscow while dealing a heavy blow to Europe’s aerospace industry.

Today, Airbus still sources roughly half of its titanium from VSMPO-AVISMA. Boeing, by contrast, once relied on Russia for about one-third of its titanium but has since stopped buying Russian material.

The Limits—and Exceptions—of EU Sanctions

Notably, while the EU has restricted imports of Russian steel and coal, titanium has not been sanctioned. The metal remains a strategic material used in fuselages, turbine blades, satellites, and other critical systems.

Dependence on Russian metals endures in other segments as well. From March to June 2022, combined EU-US imports of Russian aluminum and nickel rose to $1.98 billion—more than 70% above the prior-year period.

Washington and Brussels have generally refrained from designating industrial metals as sanction targets. Europe continues to import large volumes of Russian natural gas, and Russia supplies about 40% of global palladium—vital for semiconductors—implicating everything from automobiles to smartphones.

CBAM

CBAM: A New Variable

The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), introduced in October 2023, adds another layer of complexity. CBAM initially covers cement, electricity, fertilizers, iron and steel, aluminum, hydrogen, and certain downstream products in steel and aluminum. After a transition phase through 2025, full implementation begins in 2026, imposing carbon costs on imports equivalent to those borne by EU producers.

While fertilizers, cement, hydrogen, and non-exported electricity may see limited near-term impact, aluminum stands out as a key target sector. Most exports to the EU beyond steel and aluminum are not yet covered, though the European Commission has signaled possible expansion to high-leakage categories such as organic chemicals and plastics.

Russia is structurally disadvantaged under CBAM. Steel production in Russia, Ukraine, and Türkiye tends to be more carbon-intensive, implying higher embedded-carbon costs at the border.

Ambiguities in Sanctions and Industry’s Dilemma

The United States placed VSMPO-AVISMA on its “military end-user” list, restricting access to advanced technologies, but stopped short of a direct ban on titanium sales—an acknowledgment of global industry’s reliance on the material.

Indeed, during the early stages of the war, VSMPO-AVISMA avoided sweeping US and European sanctions. Although Washington temporarily listed the company in December 2020, the measure was later rescinded.

Recent moves, however, suggest a tightening environment. In April 2024, a joint US-UK action prompted the CME and LME to prohibit trade in newly produced Russian aluminum, copper, and nickel dated after 13 April—an effort widely read as constraining Russia’s influence in metals markets.

Ukraine Titanium Mine

Ukraine: A Viable Alternative?

Against this backdrop, Ukraine has emerged as a potential alternative. Until 2020, the country supplied 90% of Russia’s ilmenite—the feedstock for titanium sponge. With that supply chain severed by war, Ukrainian resources could help challenge Russia’s dominance.

US companies have begun talks with Kyiv on a joint venture anchored by the Zaporizhzhia Titanium-Magnesium Plant (ZTMP). Such partnerships could forge a new titanium hub in Eastern Europe, strengthening Ukraine’s economic footing for decades.

The risks are significant. Ongoing conflict and occupation threaten both Donbas deposits and the ZTMP facilities, which remain exposed to shelling and sabotage.

Aviation’s Growth—and Its Dilemma

The aerospace-titanium market was valued at roughly $100 million in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR exceeding 5% from 2023 to 2032—reflecting the rebound in air travel and a pipeline of commercial aircraft programs.

Despite supply-chain turbulence from war, energy constraints, and labor shortages, passenger traffic continues to recover, lifting titanium demand. In October 2022, Airbus announced plans to deliver more than one aircraft per week to India, persisting with expansion despite engine-supply challenges and domestic carrier capacity constraints—developments that further complicate titanium sourcing.

The Reality of Diversification

Boeing reportedly began diversifying away from Russian titanium after the 2014 annexation of Crimea. Airbus, by contrast, remains heavily reliant on Russian supply.

Globally, China produced around 100,000 t of titanium in 2013—twice the combined output of Russia and Japan at the time—making it the world’s largest producer. Japan ranked third, with Osaka Titanium Technologies standing as the world’s second-largest producer of titanium sponge.

The Metalnomist Commentary: An Unfinished Dilemma

Europe’s struggle over Russian titanium sponge epitomizes the knotty realities of modern supply chains. Between economic sanctions and security imperatives, between industrial competitiveness and moral principle, Europe has yet to find a definitive answer.

With CBAM’s full force arriving in 2026, higher carbon-cost pass-throughs on Russian metals seem likely, intensifying pressure to rewire supply. Yet, as Airbus’s position illustrates, displacing Russian titanium in the short term remains daunting.

The gap between industrial necessity and political sanction endures—witness VSMPO-AVISMA’s August 2025 statement that it stands ready to resume cooperation with Boeing. For now, Europe must navigate this dilemma with prudence: balancing sanction principles, industrial realities, and emergent environmental rules—while accelerating the use of recycled titanium wherever feasible.