Automotive Raw Material Supply Chains Hit Localisation Limits

Automotive

Automotive raw material supply chains are becoming the main constraint on electric vehicle localisation as carmakers seek more control over strategic components. Automakers want regional supply chains, but battery metals, rare earths and processed inputs still depend on global mining and refining networks.

Automotive raw material supply chains have shifted from pure efficiency toward resilience, security and geopolitical risk management. The industry is no longer trying only to minimise cost. It is trying to protect production from export controls, licensing delays, trade restrictions and raw material shortages.

Automotive raw material supply chains therefore cannot be fully localised by assembling batteries, motors or electronics closer to vehicle plants. The deeper constraint sits upstream, where lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese and rare earth materials remain tied to global extraction and processing capacity.

The result is a more selective supply-chain model. Automakers will regionalise the components they can control, while still relying on global raw materials for the minerals and refined products they cannot replace quickly.

EV Localisation Still Depends on Global Critical Minerals

Jaguar Land Rover has decided to control three critical parts of electric propulsion: battery assembly, electric drive units and energy management systems. This gives the company more control over the final systems that define EV performance.

However, vertical integration has limits. Even if an automaker controls battery assembly or electric drive units, it may not control the lithium chemicals, nickel sulphate, cobalt, manganese, graphite or rare earth magnets inside those systems.

Permanent magnet motors remain one of the clearest pressure points. Electric drive units depend on rare earth materials that are still heavily exposed to Chinese processing, magnet production and export licensing.

Obtaining magnet raw materials from China has become more difficult from a licensing perspective. This shows how export controls can affect vehicle production even when the final assembly line is located in Europe or the US.

Battery supply chains face the same structural problem. Automakers can localise pack assembly, module production and software integration, but raw material exposure remains global.

Lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese supply depends on mine locations, refining capacity, chemical conversion and government policy. These inputs cannot be made local simply by building a battery plant near an auto factory.

This changes the meaning of automotive localisation. The next phase will be less about full independence and more about reducing exposure to single-country bottlenecks.

Recycling and Traceability Become Strategic Tools

Critical minerals recycling is becoming a strategic issue for automakers, not only an environmental goal. Black mass recovery can eventually return lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper and other materials into the supply chain.

Recycling can reduce raw material exposure over time. But it depends on enough end-of-life batteries, reliable collection systems, safe transport, processing capacity and customer acceptance of recovered materials.

The UK’s critical minerals strategy reflects this reality. Domestic production, partner-country supply agreements and recycling can improve resilience, but full self-sufficiency is not realistic.

That point matters for manufacturers. Supply security will depend on diversified sourcing, trusted partners, recycling loops and traceable material flows rather than a complete break from global markets.

The shift will also affect pricing. Materials may increasingly carry value based on origin, regulatory acceptability, sustainability documentation and licensing risk.

A battery metal or rare earth input from a secure and traceable source may command a premium over lower-cost material with higher geopolitical or compliance risk.

For automakers, the strategic challenge is clear. They must control more of the EV system while accepting that critical mineral supply will remain globally contested.

For metals suppliers, the opportunity is also clear. Producers that can offer traceable, compliant and secure supply will become more valuable to automotive customers than suppliers competing only on price.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Automakers are learning that EV localisation stops where raw material dependence begins. The winners in automotive supply security will be those that connect local manufacturing with diversified minerals, recycling capacity and credible traceability.

Yunnan Germanium Output Falls as Downstream Wafer Demand Absorbs Metal

Germanium

Yunnan Germanium output of raw material-grade germanium available for external sales fell in 2025 as the company redirected more metal into internal downstream production. The shift reflects stronger demand from photovoltaic wafers, optical fibre materials and compound semiconductor products.

Yunnan Germanium output for external raw material-grade germanium sales fell by 13% to 29.7t metal equivalent. The figure excludes 68.95t used for internal consumption and third-party processing.

Yunnan Germanium output therefore signals a change in material allocation rather than simple production weakness. More germanium units are being retained inside the company’s higher-value product chain instead of being sold as raw material.

Revenue rose by 38% to 1.07bn yuan, supported by higher prices for raw germanium, optical fibre materials, PV germanium products, infrared products and semiconductor products.

PV and Optical Fibre Demand Pull Germanium Into Internal Processing

Yunnan Germanium nearly doubled production of 4-6 inch PV-grade germanium wafers in 2025. Output rose to 909,000 pieces from 491,400 pieces a year earlier.

This growth is strategically important because germanium wafers serve high-efficiency photovoltaic applications. Stronger wafer output means more raw germanium is being converted into higher-value products rather than sold into the merchant market.

Optical fibre materials also expanded. Output of optical fibre-grade germanium tetrachloride rose to 39.8t from 27t, showing stronger demand from communications infrastructure and optical transmission markets.

Infrared-grade germanium raw material output fell by 28% to 4.77t metal equivalent. However, production of infrared lenses and optical systems rose sharply to 4,717 sets from 1,828 sets.

That mix shows deeper downstream processing. The company reduced some raw infrared material output but increased finished optical systems, capturing more value further along the chain.

For germanium buyers, the key issue is external availability. When China’s largest germanium producer consumes more material internally, less raw metal is available for third-party customers.

Indium Phosphide Expansion Strengthens Compound Semiconductor Push

Yunnan Germanium also increased indium phosphide wafer output in 2025. Production of 2-4 inch InP wafers rose by 55% to 100,100 pieces.

In contrast, gallium arsenide wafer production declined by 13% to 76,300 pieces. This shows a shift in compound semiconductor emphasis toward InP, where demand is rising from advanced optical and semiconductor applications.

The company plans to keep increasing PV-grade germanium wafer and indium phosphide wafer output in 2026. It also plans to reduce infrared product output.

Yunnan Germanium targets 73t metal equivalent of raw material-grade germanium products in 2026, including internal use and third-party processing. It also plans to produce 1.45mn pieces of 4-6 inch equivalent PV-grade wafers and 180,000 pieces of 2-6 inch InP wafers.

The company also plans to produce 35t of optical fibre-grade germanium tetrachloride, 80,000 pieces of 3-6 inch GaAs wafers, 3t of infrared-grade germanium raw materials and 8,000 sets of infrared lenses and optical systems.

The planned 188.56mn yuan investment to expand high-quality InP single-crystal wafer capacity reinforces this strategy. Yunnan Germanium is moving from raw germanium supply toward integrated semiconductor and photonics material production.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Yunnan Germanium’s lower external metal output should not be read as weak demand. It shows that strategic germanium producers are capturing more value internally, tightening merchant supply while expanding into PV, optical fibre and InP wafer markets.

Lopal Marble Bar Lithium Project Deal Extends Chinese Battery Material Supply Strategy

Lopal

Lopal Marble Bar lithium project acquisition will give China’s battery cathode material producer Lopal Tech another upstream position in Western Australia’s lithium sector. The company has agreed to acquire the Marble Bar project from Global Lithium Resources for A$14.85mn.

The Lopal Marble Bar lithium project is located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. The project has an estimated resource of 18mn t grading 1.0% lithium oxide.

The Lopal Marble Bar lithium project deal reflects a continuing push by Chinese battery material producers to secure upstream lithium resources. Cathode and battery material companies are looking beyond processing capacity and moving closer to mine supply.

This matters because lithium raw material security remains central to battery supply chains. Even as lithium prices fluctuate, companies with long-term access to spodumene resources can better protect conversion plants, cathode output and customer supply.

Marble Bar Adds Pilbara Resource Exposure

The Marble Bar project gives Lopal direct exposure to a known lithium-bearing region. Western Australia remains one of the world’s most important hard-rock lithium supply bases, with spodumene projects feeding converters and battery material producers across Asia.

The project’s 18mn t resource at 1.0% lithium oxide gives Lopal a potential raw material position, although the acquisition price suggests the asset is still at an early development stage.

For Global Lithium Resources, the sale allows the company to focus more heavily on its larger Manna lithium project. Manna has a resource estimate of 52mn t grading 1.0% lithium oxide.

This creates a clearer portfolio structure. Lopal gains Marble Bar, while GL1 retains its larger Manna asset and existing downstream-linked partnerships.

The transaction also shows that Chinese battery material producers remain willing to invest in Australian lithium assets despite market volatility. Long-term supply security continues to matter more than short-term price weakness.

Manna Links Lopal to Future Offtake Supply

Lopal already has exposure to GL1 through the Manna project. It holds a 5% equity interest in Manna and has signed an offtake agreement to buy 40% of the project’s output.

China’s Canmax has agreed to take another 30% of Manna’s output and also holds a 9.45% stake in GL1. Australian lithium miner Mineral Resources owns 9.85% of GL1.

These relationships show how lithium supply chains are being structured around equity stakes and offtake agreements. Battery material companies want secured feedstock before projects enter production.

For Lopal, the Marble Bar acquisition adds another layer to its Australian lithium strategy. It gives the company project ownership while maintaining future offtake exposure through Manna.

The broader industrial meaning is clear. Chinese battery material producers are not relying only on spot markets. They are building upstream positions, offtake rights and strategic relationships to support long-term lithium chemical and cathode material supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Lopal’s Marble Bar deal shows that lithium strategy is shifting from price speculation to resource control. Even in a weaker lithium market, Chinese battery material companies continue to secure upstream positions that can support future conversion and cathode supply.

Spain Critical Raw Materials Plan Targets Mining Supply Chain Revival

Spain Mining

Spain critical raw materials policy is moving into a more active phase as the government prepares to invest €414 million to strengthen domestic mining and raw material supply. The funding will support recycling, mineral exploration, abandoned mine restoration, and workforce training across the Spanish mining sector.

The plan reflects Europe’s wider push to reduce dependence on imported critical minerals. Spain already holds an important position in the EU mining landscape. It ranks as the bloc’s second-largest copper producer and third-largest tungsten producer, giving the country a stronger base than many European peers.

Spain critical raw materials investment also comes as the EU accelerates project selection under the Critical Raw Materials Act. The European Commission has selected seven strategic mining and raw material projects in Spain, placing the country just behind Germany and France in the European project pipeline.

National Exploration Program Signals a Return to Resource Strategy

The most important part of the plan is Spain’s first National Mining Exploration Program in 50 years. The government plans to allocate €182 million to the program, marking a major shift from passive resource ownership to active resource development.

Exploration is critical because Europe’s raw material strategy cannot rely only on known deposits. Copper, tungsten, lithium, rare earths, and other strategic minerals require long development timelines. Without fresh exploration, permitting reform, and financing support, Europe’s supply ambitions will remain exposed to overseas sources.

Spain’s geological position gives the program clear industrial relevance. Copper supports power grids, electrification, renewable energy systems, and industrial manufacturing. Tungsten remains important for hard metals, defense applications, aerospace tooling, and high-performance manufacturing. As a result, the Spanish mining sector could become more strategically important to Europe’s energy transition and industrial security.

Financing Risk Remains the Main Barrier for Spanish Mining Projects

Spain critical raw materials funding addresses a long-standing complaint from mining companies. Industry players have asked for clearer financial and regulatory support because many emerging projects remain stalled despite strong policy interest.

The core problem is risk. Mining projects require large upfront capital, long permitting processes, and uncertain development timelines. Banks and investors often hesitate to provide credit lines, especially for early-stage projects that lack proven production economics.

The new funding can help reduce that gap, but it will not solve every obstacle. Spain must still convert policy support into bankable projects, faster approvals, skilled labor, and reliable infrastructure. If the government succeeds, the Spanish mining sector could become a stronger pillar of Europe’s critical raw materials strategy.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Spain’s plan is strategically important because it links exploration, recycling, and mine restoration into one raw materials agenda. However, the decisive test will be whether public funding can unlock private capital for projects that banks still view as too risky.

Yunnan Germanium Recycling Project Targets Feedstock Security for Strategic Metal Supply

Germanium Scrap

Yunnan Germanium recycling project plans will strengthen China’s largest germanium producer’s control over feedstock as demand from downstream high-end manufacturing remains strategically important. The company plans to invest 200.66mn yuan in a fully automated facility to process germanium-bearing waste slag.

The Yunnan Germanium recycling project will have capacity to process 150,000 t/yr of germanium-bearing waste slag. The company has not disclosed the construction timetable or launch date.

The Yunnan Germanium recycling project is designed to improve germanium resource utilisation and support raw material supply for downstream deep-processing products. This matters because germanium is a strategic minor metal used in defence, infrared optics, fibre optics, semiconductors and high-performance electronics.

The project also reflects a broader industry shift. Producers of critical and minor metals are increasingly trying to secure secondary feedstock as primary supply becomes more politically controlled and price volatility rises.

Recycling Capacity Reduces Dependence on External Raw Materials

Yunnan Germanium said partial reliance on externally sourced raw materials exposes it to germanium price volatility. Prices are influenced by global supply-demand conditions and demand from high-end manufacturing sectors.

The new recycling line should help reduce that exposure. By processing waste slag, the company can recover more germanium units from secondary material and support its downstream production chain.

This is strategically important because Yunnan Germanium already consumes significant germanium internally. In 2025, the company produced 29.7t of raw-material-grade germanium metal equivalent for external sales, excluding 68.95t used for internal consumption and third-party processing.

That internal use shows how the company is moving more material into higher-value products rather than selling all output into the merchant market. Recycling can strengthen that model by expanding available feedstock.

Yunnan Germanium also plans to diversify external suppliers of germanium-bearing waste slag. It will seek medium- to long-term supply agreements with quality provisions and emergency replenishment clauses.

The company also plans to build a raw material inventory reserve and a price-alert mechanism. It will adjust production and inventory strategies when germanium prices move by more than 10%.

These measures show a more disciplined approach to minor-metal procurement. In markets such as germanium, small disruptions can produce large price movements because supply is concentrated and liquidity is limited.

Export Controls Increase Strategic Value of Germanium Recovery

Germanium has become more strategically sensitive since China placed the metal under strict dual-use export controls in September 2023. China accounts for an estimated 60-70% of global germanium capacity.

This gives Chinese producers significant influence over global availability. It also makes domestic resource recovery more valuable, especially when export controls, defence demand and semiconductor-related applications increase policy attention.

Yunnan Germanium’s revenue rose to 1.07bn yuan in 2025 from 767mn yuan in 2024. Higher prices for key products, including raw-material-grade germanium, supported the increase despite lower external raw metal output.

The company’s recycling investment therefore supports both security and profitability. More stable feedstock access can improve operating flexibility when prices rise or external raw material supply tightens.

For downstream customers, the project may improve Yunnan Germanium’s ability to supply deeper-processed products. These include materials linked to optics, fibre communication, photovoltaics, infrared systems and compound semiconductors.

The broader market implication is clear. Germanium supply security will depend not only on mine output or primary production, but also on recycling, waste recovery, inventory control and long-term feedstock agreements.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Yunnan Germanium’s recycling plan shows that strategic minor metals are moving toward closed-loop resource control. In germanium, the advantage will belong to producers that can combine primary supply, secondary recovery and downstream processing under one feedstock strategy.

Trafigura Egyptalum Aluminium Smelter Plan Expands Egypt’s Primary Aluminium Ambition

Trafigura

Trafigura Egyptalum aluminium smelter plans could add a major new primary aluminium production base in Egypt, as commodity trader Trafigura enters exclusive negotiations with Egyptalum and Metallurgical Industries Holding. The proposed project would produce 300,000 t/yr of primary aluminium at Egyptalum’s Nag Hammadi complex.

The Trafigura Egyptalum aluminium smelter project is expected to cost $750mn-900mn. It would also include a 150,000 t/yr anode plant, giving the new facility a more integrated raw material and consumables base.

The Trafigura Egyptalum aluminium smelter plan shows how commodity traders are moving deeper into asset-backed metals supply. Trafigura would act as a minority equity investor, debt provider, raw material supplier and long-term offtake partner.

The agreement also reflects a broader shift in aluminium. Trading houses are no longer only moving metal through global markets. They are helping finance new production capacity, secure offtake and shape where future aluminium units will flow.

Nag Hammadi Project Could Strengthen Egypt’s Aluminium Chain

The proposed smelter would be built at Egyptalum’s existing Nag Hammadi complex. This gives the project an industrial base rather than starting from a completely new site.

A 300,000 t/yr primary aluminium smelter would materially expand Egypt’s aluminium production capability. It would also support local value creation if linked to downstream manufacturing, construction, packaging, transport and electrical applications.

The planned 150,000 t/yr anode plant is strategically important. Carbon anodes are essential consumables in aluminium smelting, and supply reliability can affect operating continuity, production cost and quality.

Primary aluminium is highly power-intensive. This means the project’s competitiveness will depend on electricity pricing, energy reliability, carbon intensity, alumina supply, anode quality and logistics.

Trafigura’s role could help reduce commercial risk. By providing debt, raw materials and long-term offtake, the trader can give the project stronger financing and market access support.

This structure also benefits Trafigura. Long-term offtake gives the company access to physical aluminium units in a market where regional supply disruptions, tariffs and energy costs are increasingly shaping trade flows.

Trading Houses Move Further Into Aluminium Capacity

The Egypt agreement follows Trafigura’s recent investment alongside Glencore and Mercuria in an 800,000 t/yr aluminium smelter in Indonesia being developed by Tsingshan. Together, these moves point to a more aggressive strategy by major traders in aluminium supply.

The logic is clear. Aluminium is becoming more strategic because it supports transport, packaging, power grids, construction, renewable energy and defence-linked manufacturing.

At the same time, primary aluminium supply is constrained by power availability, high capital costs and limited restart options in several western markets. New capacity in energy-competitive regions is therefore gaining more commercial importance.

Egypt offers a potentially strategic location between Europe, the Middle East and Africa. If the project advances, it could serve both regional demand and export markets, depending on cost structure and product mix.

For Egyptalum and MIH, the partnership could bring capital, raw material access and international marketing capability. For Trafigura, it creates another long-term aluminium flow linked to financing and offtake control.

The project remains at the negotiation stage. Its final impact will depend on shareholder structure, financing terms, power arrangements, construction timing and operating economics.

Still, the industrial message is significant. Aluminium investment is increasingly being driven by integrated finance, raw material supply and offtake strategy rather than simple capacity announcements.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Trafigura’s Egyptalum talks show that aluminium capacity is becoming a strategic financing business. The next winners in aluminium will be those that can combine energy access, raw material control, anode supply and long-term offtake.

Global Recycled Metals Output Rises as China and Emerging Regions Expand Capacity

Recycled Metals

Global recycled metals output increased further in 2025 as China maintained its leading position and emerging regions expanded recycling capacity. Production of recycled copper, aluminium, lead and zinc reached about 59.2mn t, up 5.6% from a year earlier.

Global recycled metals output is becoming more important to non-ferrous supply security as mining, processing and trade flows face rising geopolitical and cost pressures. Recycling now provides a larger secondary source of industrial metal units for manufacturers, smelters and battery supply chains.

Global recycled metals output accounted for around 34% of total non-ferrous metal production in 2025. The sector also delivered cumulative savings of about 1.2bn t of primary mineral resources, underlining its growing role in resource conservation.

The growth shows that recycled metals are no longer a secondary environmental story. They are becoming a core part of industrial raw material strategy across copper, aluminium, lead, zinc and battery metals.

China Leads as Regional Recycling Capacity Expands

China remained the world’s largest recycled base metals producer in 2025, with output of 20.57mn t. That represented 34.7% of global production.

The country’s scale gives it a major role in recycled copper, aluminium, lead and zinc supply. It also strengthens China’s position across non-ferrous metals at a time when primary raw material security is under pressure.

Europe produced more than 10mn t of recycled base metals, while the US produced more than 6mn t. India and southeast Asia reached around 6mn t and 4mn t, respectively.

These figures show that recycling capacity is becoming more geographically distributed. Emerging regions are no longer only consumers of recycled raw materials. They are becoming processing centres in their own right.

Battery-related recycling is also growing quickly. Nickel, cobalt and lithium recovery is supporting the new energy industry as electric vehicle and energy storage supply chains look for more secure material sources.

China aims to increase domestic recycled material recovery to 23mn t by 2030 under its next five-year plan. That target implies annual growth of around 7%.

The country is also expected to strengthen recycled product certification and explore the inclusion of recycled materials in carbon trading systems. This could make recycled metal more valuable for customers seeking traceable and lower-carbon supply.

Trade Flows and Technology Move Toward Asia

Global recycled raw material trade is becoming more regional, more Asia-focused and more diversified. Europe and North America remain major exporters of recycled copper and aluminium feedstock.

Europe exports around 2mn t/yr of recycled copper and aluminium feedstock, while North America exports about 4.2mn t/yr. China and India remain the largest importers, with imports exceeding 4mn t and 2mn t, respectively.

Southeast Asia is becoming a key transshipment hub. Regional recycled aluminium feedstock trade reached about 1.3mn t of imports and 900,000t of exports.

Black mass from spent lithium-ion batteries is also increasingly moving toward Asian processing centres. This reflects Asia’s stronger battery materials processing base and growing demand for recovered nickel, cobalt and lithium units.

Technology is improving the recycling value chain. Advances in laser sorting, intelligent dismantling, multi-metal battery recovery and digital process control are raising recovery rates and product quality.

Leading producers have achieved recycling rates above 94% for aluminium and 95% for lithium. These levels show how recycling is moving closer to industrial-grade resource recovery rather than simple scrap handling.

New products are also expanding. High-strength recycled aluminium alloys, high-purity recycled copper and recycled rare-earth permanent magnets are gaining traction.

This matters because recycled metal must meet customer specifications before it can displace primary material. Better sorting, cleaner chemistry and stronger certification will determine how much recycled metal can enter high-value applications.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Recycling is becoming a strategic metals supply pillar, not just a sustainability tool. The next competitive edge will come from producers that can turn complex scrap and battery waste into certified, high-purity and customer-ready materials.

EU Raw Materials Platform Targets Strategic Metals Supply Security

EU, Raw Materials Platform

EU raw materials platform development has advanced as the European Commission launched a new online mechanism to connect European offtakers with suppliers of strategic raw materials. The EU raw materials platform is designed to support demand aggregation, joint purchasing and better market information across critical supply chains.

The platform covers all 17 strategic raw materials listed under the Critical Raw Materials Act. These materials are central to batteries, rare earth magnets, defence systems, semiconductors, renewable energy, advanced manufacturing and industrial resilience.

EU raw materials platform activity will take place through structured rounds. The first diversification round will target operational projects where materials are already available or expected in the near term, with a focus on rare earths, defence-related materials and battery metals.

The mechanism will not provide financing or directly support negotiations. However, it can improve visibility across supply, demand, storage, investment opportunities and financing options, which are often fragmented in strategic raw material markets.

Demand Aggregation Could Strengthen Minor Metals Markets

Demand aggregation is the most important function of the platform. Many strategic materials are needed in small volumes by individual companies, but they carry high industrial and defence value.

This is especially true for minor metals such as gallium and germanium. These materials are used in semiconductors, optics, solar technologies, defence electronics and advanced communications systems, but individual buyers may not require large enough volumes to support new supply projects alone.

Pooling demand can change that equation. If several European buyers aggregate requirements, suppliers may see larger, more stable offtake volumes. This can improve confidence for upstream mining, refining, recycling and midstream processing projects.

The same logic applies to rare earths. Magnet makers, motor producers, defence manufacturers and clean-energy equipment suppliers often need secure access to neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium. Aggregated demand could make European purchasing more credible to non-EU suppliers.

Battery metals may also benefit. Lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese and graphite supply chains are increasingly shaped by long-term offtake, regional qualification and industrial policy. A shared platform can help buyers identify supply options before shortages become acute.

The platform therefore addresses a structural weakness in Europe’s critical materials strategy. Europe has strong downstream industries, but many of those industries purchase strategic metals in fragmented, company-by-company channels.

By collecting and exchanging market data, the mechanism could help convert dispersed demand into more bankable offtake signals. That is important for suppliers seeking financing, customers and predictable long-term buyers.

Platform Supports EU Diversification but Does Not Replace Financing

The EU raw materials platform is part of a broader strategy to reduce external dependencies under the Critical Raw Materials Act. Europe wants to diversify supply, strengthen domestic processing and secure access to materials needed for the energy transition and defence.

However, the mechanism is not a full project-financing tool. Negotiations will take place outside the system, and the platform will not guarantee deals or provide direct financial backing.

This limits what the mechanism can achieve by itself. Strategic raw material projects still need permitting, capital, technology, customer qualification, logistics and long-term price visibility.

But the platform can still play a useful role. It can bring buyers and suppliers into the same market framework, improve demand transparency and identify where joint purchasing could support supply diversification.

The first diversification round will be important because it focuses on projects close to availability. This avoids the problem of relying only on long-dated mining projects that may take years to enter production.

The inclusion of storage options is also relevant. Strategic materials supply security is not only about production. It also depends on inventories, emergency access, buffer stocks and coordinated procurement during disruption.

The broader platform also includes gas and hydrogen mechanisms. This shows that the EU is applying a similar strategic procurement model across energy and raw materials, where fragmented buying can weaken market leverage.

For Europe’s industrial base, the key issue is execution. The platform must move beyond data sharing and create real commercial connections between offtakers and suppliers. Otherwise, it risks becoming another policy tool without enough market impact.

For suppliers, the opportunity is clearer. A credible pool of European demand could make projects more attractive, especially in rare earths, gallium, germanium and battery materials where supply diversification is politically urgent.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU raw materials platform is not a financing solution, but it could become an important demand-signalling tool. Its success will depend on whether Europe can turn fragmented buyer interest into real offtake volumes that support new strategic metals supply.

Press Metal Reports 40% Profit Surge in 2024 Amid Strong Aluminium Demand and Vertical Integration Push

Press Metal Holdings

Higher Value-Added Sales and New Indonesian Alumina JV Offset Raw Material Pressures

Press Metal Delivers Record Earnings in 2024 Despite Raw Material Challenges

Malaysia’s largest aluminium producer, Press Metal Holdings, posted a 39.82% increase in pre-tax profit in 2024, reaching 2.3 billion ringgit ($519.3 million). This growth came on the back of rising aluminium prices and strong demand for value-added products, although higher alumina costs dampened some of the gains.

Annual revenue rose by 8% year-on-year to 14.91 billion ringgit, with fourth-quarter profits up 24% to 542.5 million ringgit, as reported by the company. Q4 revenue inched up 0.73% to 3.56 billion ringgit, signaling steady market demand despite input cost volatility.

Strategic JV in Indonesia Strengthens Upstream Position

To manage raw material price swings, Press Metal launched a strategic joint venture in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, in September 2024. The project involves the development of an integrated alumina refinery and supporting infrastructure, aimed at enhancing upstream control and reducing exposure to global bauxite and alumina supply risks.

CEO Koon Poh Keong noted that although alumina prices have begun to ease, policy uncertainties around bauxite sourcing continue to pose risks. The company’s vertical integration strategy is designed to boost operational resilience and protect margins against market fluctuations.

Aluminium Demand Remains Strong Across Traditional and Green Sectors

Looking ahead, Press Metal remains optimistic, citing a balanced aluminium market supported by robust investment across sectors. Demand continues to grow in clean energy, electric vehicles, grid infrastructure, and battery storage, in addition to traditional industrial uses.

By reinforcing its supply chain integration, Press Metal is positioning itself to sustain profitability while adapting to raw material cost dynamics and evolving end-market trends.

Europe Faces Challenges in Strategic Battery Funding Amid Market Oversupply

EU Battery

European countries are struggling to adopt a unified and strategic approach to funding domestic battery supply chains as global oversupply of battery materials, led by China, continues to push prices lower through at least 2030. These issues were a key focus of the Future Battery Forum held this week in Berlin, Germany.

Oversupply in Battery Materials

The battery materials market, including nickel and cobalt, faces oversupply due to significant production increases from Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). According to Siyamend Al Barazi, head of unit mineral economics at Germany’s Dera (German Mineral Resources Agency), "markets will be oversupplied at least until 2030." China's state subsidies, estimated at $230 billion from 2009 to 2023, have further contributed to this glut, maintaining downward pressure on global prices.

European Critical Raw Material Challenges

Despite the establishment of the EU Critical Raw Material Act (CRMA), which identifies 34 critical and 17 strategic materials vital to green and digital technologies, European funding efforts fall short of addressing the massive investment needs for battery material production and processing.

In September, Germany's KfW bank approved a €1 billion raw materials fund, while similar initiatives were launched by Italy, France, and the UK. However, panelists at the forum, including Jonathan Vanherberghen from Rio Tinto, argued that these amounts are insufficient for large-scale projects. For example, the capital expenditure for Rio Tinto's Jadar lithium project in Serbia alone stands at $2.5 billion.

Fragmented Funding and Industry Concerns

The fragmented funding landscape in Europe has made it difficult to pool resources effectively. Vanherberghen noted that funds like KfW’s could be more impactful if extended over longer periods to accommodate changing market cycles. Similarly, Cris Moreno, CEO of Vulcan Energy, highlighted that funding of at least $1 billion annually is required to meet the region’s ambitions. Moreno’s own lithium project in Germany has an estimated cost of $1.4 billion.

Despite the challenges, these funding initiatives provide some support by attracting institutional investors and fostering collaboration with car manufacturers, which are under increasing pressure to meet carbon targets and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) standards.

Toward a Unified European Strategy

Experts at the forum emphasized the need for a more unified and sizeable funding mechanism to bolster Europe’s battery supply chain. A single, cohesive approach would allow Europe to compete with countries like China, South Korea, and Japan, where government support for raw material projects is significantly more robust.

Vanherberghen concluded, "Funds like that will only support projects with the highest ESG standards. Bringing these things together could create a much more effective system than the fragmented approach currently in place."

EU Selects 47 Strategic Raw Materials Projects Under CRMA

EU

New Projects Aim to Boost European Raw Material Independence

The European Commission has announced 47 strategic raw materials projects across 13 EU countries under the Critical Raw Materials Act. These initiatives are part of the EU’s push to reduce foreign dependence and strengthen domestic supply chains by 2030.

The selected projects span extraction, processing, recycling, and substitution of key metals like lithium, nickel, and graphite. In total, they are expected to require €22.5 billion ($24.3 billion) in capital investment, with an accelerated permitting timeline.

Lithium and Nickel Dominate Strategic Focus

Among the 47 projects, 22 are focused on lithium, 12 on nickel, and 10 on cobalt—metals vital for green energy transitions. Projects also cover graphite, manganese, tungsten, and magnesium, all critical for battery, defense, and digital industries. The EU has set targets to meet 10% of its raw material extraction and 40% of processing needs internally by 2030. Savannah Resources’ Barroso lithium project in Portugal is among the featured initiatives with strategic classification status.

Stockpiling and Geopolitical Implications

The Commission is now gathering data on national stockpiles to assess safe storage levels for critical materials across the bloc. An EU raw materials center may coordinate stockpiling efforts starting next year, aligning with global practices in the US and China.

Given global geopolitical shifts, including US leadership changes, the EU is intensifying its focus on material security strategies. Officials stress that European clean tech independence should not lead to new forms of dependency—especially on China.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU's selection of 47 strategic raw materials projects signals a shift toward regional autonomy in critical mineral supply chains. If executed on time, the CRMA framework could reshape Europe's role in the global energy and defense materials landscape. However, execution speed and political cohesion across member states will ultimately determine the strategy’s success.

China Aerospace-Grade Titanium Sponge Exports Set to Rise as OEMs Diversify Supply

China Aerospace-Grade Titanium Sponge

China aerospace-grade titanium sponge exports are expected to rise over the next five years as western aerospace supply chains look for additional qualified raw material sources. Chinese producer Chaoyang Jinda Titanium expects international shipments of qualified aerospace-grade sponge to increase from around 1,000t this year to 10,000t by 2030.

The shift reflects a deeper change in the aerospace titanium supply chain. Western aircraft manufacturers and ingot melters are trying to reduce exposure to Russian supply, while aircraft build rates are expected to rise from 2027.

China aerospace-grade titanium sponge is therefore moving from a limited export niche into a potential supply-chain balancing tool. However, tariffs, qualification risk and geopolitical uncertainty will limit how quickly US and European buyers adopt Chinese material.

The opportunity is strongest in standard-quality structural titanium grades. Premium-quality sponge for engine, landing-gear and other critical applications is likely to remain controlled by established suppliers with long qualification histories.

Western Aerospace Buyers Face a Supply-Diversification Challenge

Aerospace-grade sponge demand is expected to recover from 2027 after a weaker 2026 caused by inventory normalisation. Mills have been reducing stocks of semi-finished titanium parts and raw materials, but aircraft production plans point to higher requirements later in the decade.

The timing is important. Airbus and Boeing both carry long aircraft backlogs, creating a decade of production visibility. This forces mills and original equipment manufacturers to look beyond short-term demand swings and secure raw material sources for future build-rate increases.

Western OEMs also continue to reassess Russian titanium exposure. If procurement from Russia declines, the market will need alternative aerospace-qualified sponge to fill the gap. Japan’s Toho Titanium and Osaka Titanium are expanding, while China is preparing to supply more qualified material.

Global approved aerospace-grade sponge supply excluding Russian products is expected to rise from about 74,000t this year to around 91,000t by 2030. Demand is expected to grow at a similar pace, leaving the market sensitive to which suppliers are included in purchasing programmes.

The supply-demand picture changes significantly depending on China and Russia. Excluding both suppliers creates a tighter market. Including them creates more apparent supply availability. This makes qualification and geopolitical acceptability just as important as physical capacity.

Some US ingot producers began qualifying Chinese titanium sponge in 2024. US imports from China rose to a 10-year high of 1,069t that year, showing that buyers were willing to test Chinese material when diversification pressure increased.

However, imports fell to 155t last year and no Chinese sponge imports were reported in January-February 2026. Tariff volatility, high mill inventories and policy uncertainty discouraged further purchasing.

This shows the main barrier for China aerospace-grade titanium sponge. Aerospace qualification requires multi-year commitments, stable documentation, repeatable quality and customer confidence. Buyers will not qualify a new source quickly if they fear trade rules could change again.

Titanium is exempt from the latest 10% US tariff, and overall duties have fallen back to 40% from 60%. But the rate itself is not the only issue. For aerospace buyers, volatility can be more damaging than the actual tariff level.

A mill can absorb or price a known tariff. It cannot easily build a long-term qualification strategy around unpredictable policy. This is why US buyers may limit Chinese sponge procurement to 15-20% of requirements, even if the material is technically acceptable.

Europe and Asia-Pacific may offer more immediate export channels. China already supplies aerospace-grade sponge to buyers in those regions, supporting shipments even when US demand is limited.

Capacity Expansion Could Change the Titanium Sponge Balance

China is preparing a large wave of aerospace-grade sponge capacity additions. Several major projects are scheduled to come on line soon, with combined new capacity of around 110,000 t/yr.

The scale is unprecedented. The planned additions exceed the combined existing capacity of Japan’s Toho and Osaka Titanium, Kazakhstan’s Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant, and Saudi Arabia’s ATTM.

China’s expansion is driven by two demand streams. Domestic aerospace demand is rising from the Comac C919 programme and military aircraft production. At the same time, producers expect higher export demand as western OEMs diversify away from Russia.

China’s titanium mill product demand already has a meaningful aerospace base. Aerospace applications accounted for about 20% of China’s titanium mill product demand in 2025, or roughly 31,280t. The chemicals industry remained the largest segment at 48%.

The domestic base gives Chinese sponge producers a stronger platform for quality improvement. Aerospace production experience matters because sponge qualification depends on consistency over time, not only nameplate capacity.

Still, some market participants question whether all new capacity can secure international aerospace qualification. New lines may need years of operating history before western melters and OEMs accept material for aircraft applications.

This is a critical distinction. China may have large physical capacity, but aerospace supply depends on approved, audited and repeatable production. Capacity alone does not guarantee market access.

Price competitiveness may support adoption. Domestic China aerospace-grade sponge prices have recently held firm at 55,000-57,000 yuan/t ex-works because of cost pressure. That remains competitive against some western supply routes, especially if buyers need alternative non-Russian material.

However, qualification is likely to split the market by application. Standard structural titanium grades are more likely to accept Chinese sponge over time. These grades support airframes and less critical structural components where qualification remains strict but less restrictive than engine-grade applications.

Premium-quality sponge will be harder to penetrate. Engine, landing-gear and other demanding aerospace uses require deeper qualification, tighter chemistry control and stronger confidence from prime contractors and tier suppliers.

Airbus’ titanium demand outlook adds another layer. The A350 is a high titanium-bearing platform, with titanium representing around 15% of aircraft weight. As A350 production rises toward 2027 and 2028, titanium demand visibility should improve across the supply chain.

That demand pull could make Chinese material more attractive if western supply tightens. But buyers will still balance cost, qualification, geopolitics and supply security.

For Chinese producers, the path is clear but difficult. They must prove consistent aerospace-grade quality, build long-term customer trust, manage export documentation and navigate trade policy risk.

For western OEMs, the decision is strategic. China aerospace-grade titanium sponge could reduce Russia exposure and improve supply flexibility. But it also introduces another geopolitical dependency at a time when aerospace and defence supply chains are under closer scrutiny.

The most likely outcome is partial adoption. Chinese sponge may become a growing supplement for standard-quality structural grades, while established Japanese, Kazakh, Saudi and other qualified suppliers remain central to premium aerospace applications.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China aerospace-grade titanium sponge will become harder for western aerospace supply chains to ignore as aircraft build rates rise and Russian exposure narrows. The decisive issue is not capacity, but whether Chinese producers can convert new output into trusted, qualified and politically acceptable supply.

Brazil Critical Minerals Investment Plan Gets R50bn Boost From Bndes

Bndes

Brazil critical minerals investment is moving further into the centre of the country’s industrial policy after development bank Bndes announced plans to invest R50bn in projects linked to the sector.

Brazil critical minerals investment will target projects connected to fertilizers, artificial intelligence, flying cars, Embraer and other strategic industries. The bank is reviewing 56 projects, although it has not disclosed the investment timeline.

Brazil critical minerals investment matters because the country wants to use its mineral base to support reindustrialization, not only raw material exports. Bndes president Aloizio Mercadante said Brazil should become a protagonist in critical minerals because of its significant reserves.

Brazil holds around 10% of global critical minerals reserves, according to domestic research and mining institutions. That resource position is drawing rising international interest, especially from the US.

Bndes Funding Links Minerals to Industrial Strategy

Bndes’ R50bn commitment gives Brazil’s critical minerals policy a stronger financing pillar. Capital availability is essential because mining, processing and downstream projects require long development timelines and high upfront investment.

The bank’s focus also shows that Brazil is defining critical minerals broadly. Fertilizers, artificial intelligence, advanced mobility, aerospace and Embraer-linked supply chains all require secure access to strategic materials.

This approach connects minerals policy with national manufacturing goals. Brazil wants critical minerals to feed domestic value chains, support higher-value production and strengthen industrial competitiveness.

The announcement follows congressional approval of a bill supporting projects linked to the production of critical and strategic minerals. Together, policy support and development-bank financing could improve the investment environment.

However, execution will decide the impact. Brazil must turn reserves into mined, processed and customer-ready materials before it can capture the full industrial value of critical minerals.

Brazil’s Reserves Attract US and Global Interest

Brazil’s resource base is becoming more strategically important as governments and manufacturers seek alternatives to concentrated supply chains. The energy transition, AI infrastructure, aerospace and defence-linked industries all require reliable mineral inputs.

The US has long sought a critical minerals agreement with Brazil. That interest reflects Washington’s broader effort to diversify supply away from China-dominated processing and strengthen allied raw material access.

For Brazil, foreign interest creates both opportunity and risk. International partnerships can bring capital, technology and customers, but Brazil wants the sector to serve domestic development and reindustrialization.

That balance will shape future deals. Brazil can become a major supplier of critical minerals, but its stronger opportunity lies in processing, refining, recycling and advanced material production.

Bndes’ funding signal gives the country a chance to move in that direction. If aligned with permitting, infrastructure and industrial demand, the R50bn programme could help Brazil capture more value from its mineral base.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Brazil is making critical minerals part of its reindustrialization agenda, not just its mining agenda. The strategic test will be whether Bndes funding helps build processing and downstream capacity before foreign buyers lock in raw material flows.

NBVL Ferro-Silicon Output Surges 480% on Strong Export Demand

NBVL

NBVL ferro-silicon output achieved remarkable growth with production reaching 13,490 tonnes in FY2025, compared to just 2,380 tonnes the previous year. The Indian ferro-alloy producer's NBVL ferro-silicon production increase of nearly six times reflects strong international orders, particularly from the US market, amid challenging domestic conditions and oversupply pressures.

Strategic Furnace Conversion Drives Production Expansion

NBVL ferro-silicon production capacity expanded through strategic infrastructure investments beginning in January 2024. The company launched its first ferro-silicon furnace with 11,000 tonnes annual capacity, followed by a second furnace in December 2024. However, the second furnace switched back to silico-manganese production on May 1, 2025, following the US imposition of additional 10% tariffs on ferro-silicon imports.

Meanwhile, the furnace conversion strategy impacted silico-manganese production at NBVL's Paloncha operations. Silico-manganese output decreased 4.4% to 25,617 tonnes in Q4 FY2025 as two furnaces were temporarily converted to ferro-silicon production. Total silico-manganese production fell slightly to just under 104,200 tonnes for the full financial year.

Export Focus Delivers Revenue Growth Despite Market Challenges

However, NBVL's export-oriented strategy proved successful despite domestic market headwinds and international trade tensions. Export sales constituted 40% of total sales during FY2025, with the majority of ferro-silicon shipments destined for US markets. Combined silico-manganese and ferro-silicon sales reached 42,327 tonnes in Q4, significantly higher than 20,068 tonnes in the previous quarter.

Therefore, the company's strategic pivot toward international markets generated improved revenue and profitability metrics. NBVL management indicated expectations for better performance in FY2026 while targeting Japanese markets rather than domestic or other international destinations. This geographic diversification strategy aims to reduce dependence on tariff-affected US ferro-silicon trade.

Market Conditions Shape Future Investment Strategy

Furthermore, NBVL management expressed caution about domestic expansion plans citing existing oversupply conditions in India's ferro-alloy market. The company indicated it would consider expansion only after securing dedicated raw material sources to ensure competitive cost structures. This conservative approach reflects broader industry challenges including volatile raw material prices and intense competition.

As a result, the US tariff implementation on ferro-silicon products demonstrates how trade policies directly influence production decisions and market strategies. NBVL's quick response in switching the second furnace back to silico-manganese production illustrates operational flexibility in navigating changing trade conditions while maintaining export competitiveness.

The Metalnomist Commentary

NBVL's dramatic ferro-silicon output expansion exemplifies how Indian ferro-alloy producers leverage export opportunities to offset domestic market weakness, though trade policy changes require rapid operational adjustments. The company's strategic furnace switching capabilities demonstrate the importance of production flexibility in navigating volatile international trade conditions that increasingly characterize global ferro-alloy markets.

Brazil Critical Minerals Bill Moves Country Toward Domestic Processing Strategy

Critical Minerals

Brazil critical minerals bill approval by the lower house marks a major step toward turning the country’s mineral reserves into a domestic industrial development strategy. The bill establishes the national policy of critical and strategic minerals and creates incentives for companies to process and transform those materials inside Brazil.

Brazil critical minerals bill measures include a new mineral activity guarantee fund backed by R2bn in federal money. The fund will support projects linked to the production of critical and strategic minerals.

Brazil critical minerals bill incentives also include R5bn in tax credits over five years to encourage processing and transformation. This shows that Brazil does not want to remain only an exporter of raw materials.

The bill will now move to the senate. Mines and energy minister Alexandre Silveira said he will work directly with senators to accelerate approval, framing critical minerals as a matter of economic modernisation and national sovereignty.

Processing Incentives Target Value Creation Inside Brazil

The bill creates the national council for the industrialisation of critical and strategic minerals. The council will decide which minerals qualify as critical and strategic and will update the list every four years.

This structure is important because Brazil has large resource potential but still needs stronger domestic processing capacity. Without refining, separation, transformation and recycling, mineral wealth can leave the country as low-value raw material.

The proposed guarantee fund and tax credits are designed to change that pattern. They will support projects considered strategic under the national policy, with a focus on minerals that can strengthen Brazil’s industrial base.

Congress member Arnaldo Jardim, the bill’s rapporteur, said critical minerals represent a development opportunity for Brazil. He argued that the country should become a major rare earths producer, stimulate recycling through urban mining and make its processing industry more competitive.

That message reflects a broader shift in resource policy. Brazil is trying to position critical minerals as a tool for industrial development, not only export revenue.

Rare earths are especially important. Brazil has significant rare earth potential, and global buyers are searching for alternatives to China-dominated supply chains. If Brazil can move beyond mining into separation and processing, it could become more relevant to magnet, defence, electronics and clean energy markets.

Urban mining also deserves attention. Recycling can strengthen domestic supply, reduce waste and create secondary sources of critical materials from electronics, batteries, industrial scrap and end-of-life equipment.

US Interest Raises Brazil’s Strategic Importance

The bill comes as Brazil and the US are discussing critical minerals more actively. Presidents Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Donald Trump are expected to meet this week, and critical minerals are likely to be part of the agenda.

The US has long sought a critical minerals agreement with Brazil. Goias state has already signed a cooperation agreement with the US, although Brazil’s federal government has challenged its legal validity.

That dispute shows how politically sensitive critical minerals have become. Foreign partnerships can bring investment and market access, but the federal government wants to ensure that strategic minerals serve national interests.

Brazil holds about 10% of global critical minerals reserves, according to domestic research and mining institutions. The sector is expected to attract $21.3bn in investment by 2030.

This gives Brazil strong leverage. The country has rare earths, niobium, graphite, nickel, lithium and other minerals that are increasingly important to batteries, magnets, aerospace, electronics and energy transition technologies.

However, reserves alone will not determine Brazil’s role. The country must build processing capacity, permitting efficiency, infrastructure, financing tools and reliable industrial partnerships.

The new policy could help unlock that pathway. If approved by the senate and implemented effectively, it could shift Brazil from a raw material supplier toward a more integrated critical minerals economy.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Brazil is making the right strategic move by linking critical minerals to processing, tax incentives and industrial policy. The real test will be execution: Brazil must convert resource potential into refining, separation, recycling and customer-ready supply before global competitors secure the next wave of investment.

AXT to Shift Focus Amid Rising Germanium Prices: Challenges and Future Outlook

AXT

AXT, a leading US compound semiconductor supplier, is adjusting its strategy in response to soaring germanium (Ge) prices, which have significantly impacted its margins. The company, primarily known for its production of Ge substrates, announced that it would be pulling back from the germanium substrate market in the fourth quarter due to unsustainable production costs and lower margins. This decision comes after a sharp rise in Ge prices during the third quarter, driven by supply concerns stemming from China's government-imposed export restrictions.

Rising Ge Prices and Impact on AXT’s Business

The price of germanium, a critical material in semiconductor manufacturing, surged in the third quarter, tightening profit margins for AXT. As the world’s primary supplier of germanium, China’s export restrictions have created significant supply chain disruptions. As a result, AXT faced increased production costs that it was unable to pass on to customers, leading the company to pull back from low-margin Ge substrate business.

In the third quarter, AXT’s revenue from germanium substrates dropped to $1.6 million from $2.9 million in the second quarter, though this was still an improvement compared to $1.2 million from the same period last year. The decline in revenue was attributed to the inability to absorb rising material costs and the overall tightening of profit margins. Despite these challenges, AXT remains optimistic about re-entering the Ge substrate market as demand from low-orbit satellite services, such as Elon Musk's Starlink and China’s satellite launches, continues to grow.

AXT’s Shift to Indium Phosphide and Future Prospects

While germanium substrate business faces short-term setbacks, AXT is focusing on its indium phosphide (InP) product line, which has been seeing increased demand, particularly from data centers and artificial intelligence (AI) applications. InP revenue reached $6.8 million in the third quarter, driven by continued demand in AI and passive optical networks. AXT has also launched a new InP product targeting silicon photonics and electro-absorption modulated lasers (EMLs), receiving positive response and a design win from a major customer.

The company remains confident about the future of InP and its potential for growth, especially as AI and data centers continue to expand. Additionally, AXT anticipates a recovery in demand for light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and EMLs, supported by stimulus measures in China’s economy, which could bolster demand from the automotive industry. However, the company has experienced a dip in revenue from gallium arsenide (GaAs) substrates, which was $6.6 million in Q3, down from $9.1 million in Q2, largely due to lower demand and the ongoing economic slowdown in China.

Demand for Gallium and HPT Market Growth

AXT’s joint venture, which supplies gallium raw materials, saw increased demand in the third quarter, but the company’s sales of gallium arsenide substrates have slowed. This trend is in line with broader market conditions, including reduced demand in telecoms after a sharp decline last year. However, the company is still optimistic about future growth in the high-power telecom (HPT) market, driven by the 5G telecom expansion.

AXT continues to see interest from customers in China, particularly those looking for diversified gallium suppliers due to concerns over Chinese export restrictions on gallium. Despite challenges, AXT’s raw material supply chain remains stable, and the company expects growth in its core markets, particularly with 5G technology and emerging industrial applications.

Conclusion

AXT’s strategic decision to step back from the germanium substrate market reflects the company's commitment to maintaining profitability despite volatile raw material costs. While facing challenges in Ge and GaAs markets, AXT is diversifying its portfolio and focusing on high-demand products like InP. As the demand for AI, data centers, and satellite technologies grows, AXT remains poised to capitalize on emerging opportunities in the semiconductor industry, with an optimistic outlook for medium- to long-term growth.

Australia EU Trade Deal Secures Critical Raw Materials Supply

Australia, EU trade

Australia EU trade deal negotiations have concluded after eight years, giving the EU a new framework to secure stable access to critical raw materials. The agreement targets minerals including lithium, bauxite, manganese, tantalum, nickel, cobalt, copper, and rare earth oxides.

The Australia EU trade deal will cut or remove bilateral tariffs on critical raw materials and value-added mineral products. This gives European manufacturers a more reliable supply route at a time when tariffs, export controls, and geopolitical pressure are reshaping global materials trade.

The agreement also strengthens Australia’s position as a preferred critical minerals partner for Europe. Australia produces around a third of global lithium and remains a major supplier of bauxite, iron ore, zirconium, and rare earth elements.

Critical Minerals Access Becomes Central to EU Trade Policy

The EU is using the Australia EU trade deal to reduce exposure to China-dominated supply chains and rising US tariff risks. The agreement reflects Brussels’ shift from traditional trade liberalisation toward strategic supply chain security.

Critical raw materials are now central to European industrial policy because they support batteries, electric vehicles, renewable energy, defence systems, aerospace, electronics, and advanced manufacturing. Stable access to lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, copper, and rare earths will determine how quickly Europe can scale clean-energy manufacturing.

The deal also includes deeper co-operation on critical raw materials, including possible co-financing of key projects. This matters because Europe needs not only raw mineral access, but also investment in processing, refining, and value-added material production.

Australia Gains Strategic Value as Europe Diversifies Supply

Australia stands to gain economically and strategically from the agreement. The deal is expected to add about $7 billion per year to the Australian economy, while European producers could save more than $1.1 billion in tariffs over the next decade.

The timing is important because Europe is rapidly diversifying its strategic trade partnerships. The EU recently moved forward with trade agreements involving Mercosur and India, showing that Brussels is building a wider network of reliable raw material and manufacturing partners.

The Australia agreement still requires approval by a majority of EU member states and consent from the European Parliament before ratification is complete. However, the strategic direction is already clear: Europe wants critical minerals supply from partners with stable governance, developed mining capacity, and lower geopolitical risk.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The Australia EU trade deal shows that critical minerals have moved from procurement strategy to trade architecture. Europe is no longer simply buying raw materials; it is building alliances to secure the minerals, processing capacity, and industrial resilience needed for the energy transition.

European Stainless Tube Trade Shifts as Policy, Imports and Data Centres Reshape Demand

European Stainless Steel

European stainless tube trade is entering a more selective phase as producers defend margins through higher-value applications, tighter specifications and regional supply advantages. The market remains stable, but it is no longer driven mainly by volume growth.

European stainless tube trade is being reshaped by three forces at once. Imports continue to pressure commodity and process pipe segments. Policy measures such as CBAM and revised safeguards are changing cost structures. At the same time, automotive exhaust demand is declining as electrification advances.

Speakers at SMR’s Stainless Steel Tube and Pipe Market Insights Day in Dusseldorf said Europe is behaving like a mature and cyclical market. Asia remains the main centre of stainless steel consumption and commodity production, while Europe depends more on technical applications, certification and regulatory positioning.

European stainless tube trade is therefore moving away from simple price competition. Producers are increasingly competing on quality, traceability, sustainability, lead times and the ability to serve complex end uses.

Italy-based Marcegaglia Specialties said traditional sectors such as construction, energy, oil and gas, automotive, water and food processing remain the backbone of demand. However, the next stage of competition will depend more on sustainability and product complexity than on basic market expansion.

CBAM and Import Pressure Are Regionalising Stainless Tube Supply

European stainless tube trade is becoming more regional because policy and geopolitics are increasing the value of local supply. CBAM, revised safeguard measures and wider instability are pushing buyers to look more carefully at origin, emissions, delivery risk and compliance.

European producers already operate inside the EU regulatory framework. This gives them an advantage in some higher-value applications where customers require reliable documentation, stable quality and shorter supply chains.

But the policy environment is not simple. Some industry speakers warned that CBAM could become more protectionist than environmental if it raises costs for European downstream processors without fully addressing import competition.

This concern is especially relevant for stainless tube makers. They buy input material under EU cost structures, but still compete with imported finished or semi-finished products in certain market segments.

OSTP chief executive Andrea Gatti argued that CBAM and revised tariff-rate quotas are creating a difficult environment for downstream processors. He said the measures can raise raw material costs for European producers while leaving import pressure unresolved in some product categories.

One concern is the way carbon steel and stainless steel products remain grouped in some quota categories. This can obscure the real level of import pressure in specific stainless segments.

The issue is most visible in process pipe. Overall import penetration in European welded stainless pipe may look moderate, but import pressure is much stronger in process pipe than in automotive or structural applications.

Some imported process pipe is arriving at prices close to European producers’ raw material costs. This creates a serious margin problem for EU producers, especially when they must meet higher regulatory, labour and energy costs.

Asian imports are particularly competitive in pipe and fittings made to ASTM specifications. Around 15-20% of the European market still requires ASTM-based products, often because older engineering standards and end-user specifications remain in place.

This creates an opening for Asian suppliers. Many have long experience producing ASTM-based products and can compete aggressively in segments where buyers focus mainly on price and basic compliance.

Asian producers are also becoming more capable of supplying European-standard material. However, some barriers remain. Hot-rolled feedstock availability, customer qualification and more complex technical requirements still protect parts of the European market.

CBAM adds another layer of uncertainty. Importers and buyers still lack full visibility on the actual carbon values that overseas suppliers will declare. Some emissions disclosures remain incomplete or unreliable.

This creates pricing uncertainty. If importers use default emissions values, CBAM costs may rise sharply. If suppliers provide certified actual data, costs may be lower. But the market does not yet know which overseas suppliers can verify emissions credibly.

For European producers, this uncertainty is both an opportunity and a risk. It may make some imports less attractive, but it also complicates raw material sourcing and customer negotiations.

The broader result is regionalisation. Buyers are increasingly weighing whether cheaper imported material is worth the compliance, delivery and emissions risk. European producers can benefit if they turn regulation into a trusted supply advantage.

However, they cannot rely on regulation alone. Imports will continue to pressure standard grades and process pipe where price remains decisive. Europe’s defence must therefore come from technical capability, service and qualification depth.

Automotive Decline and Data Centres Redefine Growth Applications

European stainless tube producers also face structural demand change in automotive applications. Exhaust-related stainless tube demand is declining as electric vehicle adoption reduces the long-term need for combustion engine systems.

German tubemaker Schoeller Werk said about 40% of its business is still linked to automotive. Around 95% of that automotive exposure is tied to combustion engine applications.

This creates a clear transition risk. Combustion engine exhaust systems have historically used stainless tube because of heat resistance, corrosion performance and durability. Electric vehicles remove much of that demand.

Industry speakers described this shift as irreversible, even if the speed varies by region. Combustion vehicles may remain relevant for some years, but the structural direction is clear.

Marcegaglia also described the shift away from combustion-engine vehicles as a trend that stainless tube producers must manage. The market cannot assume that traditional automotive exhaust demand will return.

This forces producers to find new growth areas. Data centres emerged as one of the clearest near-term opportunities during the Dusseldorf discussions.

Data centre stainless demand is growing because cooling systems are becoming more important. AI workloads, higher server density and larger hyperscale facilities require more advanced thermal management.

Stainless tubes can be used in cooling circuits, heat exchangers and wider water infrastructure. These applications often require corrosion resistance, reliability and long service life.

Gatti said the strongest opportunity may not only sit in outer water infrastructure. Inner cooling circuits also present growth potential as specifications increasingly exclude carbon steel and favour copper or stainless steel.

Copper’s high price is helping stainless steel compete. In some data centre applications, stainless can win substitution from copper on cost grounds while still meeting performance requirements.

This creates a valuable opening for European producers. Data centres are not only a volume market. They require quality, traceability, reliability and tight specifications, which fit Europe’s competitive strengths.

However, Asian competition remains a threat. If data centre projects are specified to ASTM standards, Asian suppliers may still compete strongly. This means European producers need early involvement in specifications and project qualification.

Other higher-value markets may also support growth. Specialist energy systems, premium process pipe, food processing, water treatment and industrial heat exchangers all require more complex tube products.

The key difference is that these markets reward performance rather than only price. European producers are better positioned when customers value certification, documentation, short lead times, sustainability and technical support.

This is why Europe’s competitive advantage increasingly lies in complexity. Producers cannot win every commodity segment against lower-cost imports. But they can defend and grow in applications where failure risk, qualification standards and technical requirements matter.

The next decade will likely reward producers that invest in advanced materials and difficult applications. This includes higher corrosion resistance, special dimensions, better surface quality, stronger traceability and lower-carbon documentation.

Policy could help if it is implemented carefully. CBAM and safeguards may support regional supply, but they must avoid damaging downstream processors through higher input costs or poorly designed quota structures.

The real test for Europe is execution. Producers must turn sustainability and regulation into commercial value, not only compliance costs. That means proving lower carbon intensity, shorter logistics chains and stronger product reliability.

European stainless tube trade will therefore become more segmented. Commodity and ASTM process pipe will remain import-sensitive. Automotive exhaust demand will decline. Data centres and complex industrial applications will become more important.

For producers, the strategy is clear. Europe must compete where technical standards, certification, sustainability and customer proximity matter most.

The Metalnomist Commentary

European stainless tube producers are being pushed out of low-margin commodity competition and into higher-specification markets. The winners will be companies that convert regulation, traceability and technical complexity into pricing power, especially in data centres, energy systems and premium process pipe.