EU Raw Materials Platform Targets Strategic Metals Supply Security

EU, Raw Materials Platform

EU raw materials platform development has advanced as the European Commission launched a new online mechanism to connect European offtakers with suppliers of strategic raw materials. The EU raw materials platform is designed to support demand aggregation, joint purchasing and better market information across critical supply chains.

The platform covers all 17 strategic raw materials listed under the Critical Raw Materials Act. These materials are central to batteries, rare earth magnets, defence systems, semiconductors, renewable energy, advanced manufacturing and industrial resilience.

EU raw materials platform activity will take place through structured rounds. The first diversification round will target operational projects where materials are already available or expected in the near term, with a focus on rare earths, defence-related materials and battery metals.

The mechanism will not provide financing or directly support negotiations. However, it can improve visibility across supply, demand, storage, investment opportunities and financing options, which are often fragmented in strategic raw material markets.

Demand Aggregation Could Strengthen Minor Metals Markets

Demand aggregation is the most important function of the platform. Many strategic materials are needed in small volumes by individual companies, but they carry high industrial and defence value.

This is especially true for minor metals such as gallium and germanium. These materials are used in semiconductors, optics, solar technologies, defence electronics and advanced communications systems, but individual buyers may not require large enough volumes to support new supply projects alone.

Pooling demand can change that equation. If several European buyers aggregate requirements, suppliers may see larger, more stable offtake volumes. This can improve confidence for upstream mining, refining, recycling and midstream processing projects.

The same logic applies to rare earths. Magnet makers, motor producers, defence manufacturers and clean-energy equipment suppliers often need secure access to neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium. Aggregated demand could make European purchasing more credible to non-EU suppliers.

Battery metals may also benefit. Lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese and graphite supply chains are increasingly shaped by long-term offtake, regional qualification and industrial policy. A shared platform can help buyers identify supply options before shortages become acute.

The platform therefore addresses a structural weakness in Europe’s critical materials strategy. Europe has strong downstream industries, but many of those industries purchase strategic metals in fragmented, company-by-company channels.

By collecting and exchanging market data, the mechanism could help convert dispersed demand into more bankable offtake signals. That is important for suppliers seeking financing, customers and predictable long-term buyers.

Platform Supports EU Diversification but Does Not Replace Financing

The EU raw materials platform is part of a broader strategy to reduce external dependencies under the Critical Raw Materials Act. Europe wants to diversify supply, strengthen domestic processing and secure access to materials needed for the energy transition and defence.

However, the mechanism is not a full project-financing tool. Negotiations will take place outside the system, and the platform will not guarantee deals or provide direct financial backing.

This limits what the mechanism can achieve by itself. Strategic raw material projects still need permitting, capital, technology, customer qualification, logistics and long-term price visibility.

But the platform can still play a useful role. It can bring buyers and suppliers into the same market framework, improve demand transparency and identify where joint purchasing could support supply diversification.

The first diversification round will be important because it focuses on projects close to availability. This avoids the problem of relying only on long-dated mining projects that may take years to enter production.

The inclusion of storage options is also relevant. Strategic materials supply security is not only about production. It also depends on inventories, emergency access, buffer stocks and coordinated procurement during disruption.

The broader platform also includes gas and hydrogen mechanisms. This shows that the EU is applying a similar strategic procurement model across energy and raw materials, where fragmented buying can weaken market leverage.

For Europe’s industrial base, the key issue is execution. The platform must move beyond data sharing and create real commercial connections between offtakers and suppliers. Otherwise, it risks becoming another policy tool without enough market impact.

For suppliers, the opportunity is clearer. A credible pool of European demand could make projects more attractive, especially in rare earths, gallium, germanium and battery materials where supply diversification is politically urgent.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU raw materials platform is not a financing solution, but it could become an important demand-signalling tool. Its success will depend on whether Europe can turn fragmented buyer interest into real offtake volumes that support new strategic metals supply.

Materion AI Demand Lifts Sales as Defence Orders Strengthen

Materion

Materion AI demand helped drive a sharp rise in first-quarter sales as electronics, defence and semiconductor customers increased orders for advanced materials. The US-based producer reported net sales of $549.8mn, up 30.8% from a year earlier.

Materion AI demand was most visible in the company’s electronic materials segment, where sales rose strongly on higher demand from chipmaking applications. Adjusted Ebitda increased by 8.6% to $52.9mn, showing that revenue growth translated into stronger earnings despite mixed performance across business units.

Materion AI demand also reflects a broader industrial trend. Artificial intelligence is increasing demand for logic chips, memory devices, thin-film materials, high-purity chemicals and precision components used across the semiconductor supply chain.

The company’s order backlog rose by more than 20% year on year at the end of the quarter. Defence orders exceeded $60mn, while open requests for quotations surpassed $300mn, indicating continued momentum in aerospace and defence materials.

AI Chips Lift Electronic Materials Sales

Materion’s electronic materials segment delivered the strongest growth in the quarter. Net sales rose to $363.3mn from $224.8mn a year earlier.

The segment produces tantalum sputtering targets for thin-film vapour deposition. These targets are used in semiconductor manufacturing, especially in logic and memory chip production.

Tantalum is important because it supports thin, reliable and high-performance films inside advanced chips. As AI workloads grow, semiconductor manufacturers need more materials that support higher computing power, better efficiency and tighter device architectures.

Materion also produces advanced chemicals and semiconductor materials. These products place the company deeper inside the AI hardware supply chain, where material purity, consistency and qualification are critical.

The sales increase shows that AI is not only driving demand for finished chips or data centre hardware. It is also increasing demand for upstream specialty materials that enable chip fabrication.

This is significant for minor metals and advanced materials suppliers. AI growth is pulling more value toward high-purity inputs, sputtering targets, deposition materials, precision optics and performance alloys.

Defence Backlog Supports Performance Materials Recovery

Materion’s aerospace and defence order rates increased by 50% over the past 12 months. Energy order rates rose by more than 20%, while semiconductor order rates increased by 10%.

The defence order book is especially important. More than $60mn of defence orders in one quarter, combined with over $300mn in open quotation requests, gives Materion stronger visibility into future demand.

Materion’s performance-materials segment had a weaker first quarter. Net sales fell to $155.7mn from $174mn a year earlier, mainly because of lower precision-clad material sales.

However, the company expects performance-material sales to improve from the second quarter. Aerospace and defence demand should support the recovery.

The segment includes beryllium products and alloys, along with niobium, tantalum and nickel alloys. These materials serve demanding applications where strength, conductivity, thermal stability, corrosion resistance or weight reduction are essential.

Materion had suspended clad-strip production in the fourth quarter of 2025 because of material quality problems. Production resumed as expected in January-March and returned to pre-issue levels.

Precision optics also strengthened. Sales rose by 43% to $30.8mn, with demand improving across life sciences, consumer electronics, automotive, aerospace and defence, and semiconductors.

The result shows that Materion is exposed to several high-value growth channels at once. AI supports electronics materials, defence supports performance alloys, and precision optics benefits from advanced manufacturing and semiconductor demand.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Materion’s quarter shows how AI and defence demand are pulling specialty materials deeper into strategic supply chains. The key signal is not just higher sales, but the growing importance of tantalum, beryllium, niobium, nickel alloys and precision optics in advanced manufacturing.

5N Plus Semiconductor Materials Demand Rises as Germanium Refining Gains Strategic Value

5N Plus

5N Plus semiconductor materials demand remains strong despite rising input and operating cost pressure expected in 2026. The Canadian materials producer sees continued demand from solar, artificial intelligence, defense, and high-purity specialty semiconductor markets.

The company expects geopolitical uncertainty and broader economic factors to increase costs this year. However, 5N Plus semiconductor materials remain well positioned because AI-related power demand is supporting the solar sector and strengthening demand for advanced materials used in high-performance applications.

5N Plus reported strong 2025 results, with revenue rising 35pc year on year to $391mn. Its specialty semiconductors segment grew 41pc to $285mn, while performance materials revenue increased 22pc to $106mn. Profit more than tripled to $50.6mn, highlighting strong operating momentum despite a more complex cost environment.

Solar and Defense Demand Support Specialty Materials Growth

Solar remains a key demand driver for 5N Plus. The company expects its Germany-based solar cell producer Azur Space to expand production capacity by another 25pc in 2026. This follows capacity increases of 35pc in 2024 and 30pc in 2025.

This expansion shows how specialty solar materials are gaining value as AI, data centres, satellites, and power-sensitive applications increase demand for reliable energy technologies. Even with US policy shifts, 5N Plus expects solar-related demand to remain strong because underlying electricity needs continue to rise.

Defense is also becoming a more important opportunity. Several large defense companies have shown interest in 5N Plus’ ability to refine and recycle strategic minerals. This reflects a wider industrial shift in which high-purity materials, recycling capability, and secure domestic supply are becoming central to defense procurement.

Germanium Refining Expands US Critical Materials Capability

Germanium refining is emerging as a strategic growth area for 5N Plus. The US Department of Defense awarded the company $18.1mn in January to scale germanium refining capacity at its St George facility in Utah.

The project will gradually increase the company’s ability to recycle and recover metal from industrial waste. 5N Plus aims to produce 20 metric tonnes per year of high-purity germanium through 2030, strengthening US access to a critical material used in semiconductors, infrared systems, fiber optics, solar cells, and defense technologies.

The company expects the germanium expansion to have very little impact on 2026 revenue because commercial benefits will take at least a year to emerge. Still, the project has strategic value because it connects recycling, refining, and secure supply of high-purity materials in North America.

The Metalnomist Commentary

5N Plus shows how specialty materials companies are becoming strategic infrastructure for AI, defense, and energy transition supply chains. The near-term challenge is cost inflation, but the long-term opportunity is high-purity refining and recycling for materials that governments increasingly view as security-critical.

5N Plus Supply Security Becomes Top Priority as Semiconductor Materials Demand Rises

5N Plus

5N Plus supply security has become the company’s top priority as geopolitical volatility, trade uncertainty and rising customer demand reshape the semiconductor materials market. The Canadian producer said reliable supply is now essential to avoid disruptions for customers in renewable energy, space solar power and performance materials.

5N Plus supply security is becoming more important because the company operates in sensitive material chains serving semiconductors, solar cells and advanced industrial applications. These markets require consistent quality, qualified feedstock and stable delivery.

5N Plus supply security also reflects a wider shift in critical materials procurement. Customers are no longer focused only on price. They increasingly want trusted suppliers that can manage input volatility, origin risk and operating disruptions.

The company reported first-quarter revenue of $117.9mn, up 33% from a year earlier. Profit increased by 86% to $17.8mn, supported by growth across both business segments.

Specialty Semiconductor Revenue Rises on Solar and Space Demand

Revenue from the specialty semiconductor segment rose by 37% to $86.2mn in the first quarter. Higher volumes from the terrestrial renewable energy industry drove the increase.

Demand from the space solar power sector also supported growth. This is strategically important because space-grade solar cells require high-performance semiconductor materials and strict qualification standards.

5N Plus’ Germany-based solar cell producer Azur Space is expanding capacity again. The company expects to add another 25% of capacity by the second half of this year.

That follows capacity increases of 35% in 2024 and 30% in 2025. The expansion shows that demand for advanced solar cell technology remains strong across terrestrial and space applications.

The growth also highlights the strategic role of specialty materials in energy and aerospace supply chains. Solar power, satellites and advanced electronics depend on reliable access to high-purity inputs and qualified manufacturing capacity.

Cost Volatility Tests Performance Materials Margins

5N Plus’ performance materials segment also grew in the first quarter. Revenue rose by 21% on the year to $31.7mn.

Favourable pricing conditions supported the segment, but the company expects pricing to normalise in coming quarters. That could reduce some of the revenue uplift if volumes do not offset weaker prices.

Cost volatility remains a major risk. 5N Plus expects trade uncertainty, inflationary pressure and higher input costs to continue affecting margins through the year.

This matters because semiconductor and performance materials producers must manage both upstream feedstock risk and downstream customer commitments. Any mismatch between input costs and contract pricing can pressure profitability.

The company’s results show strong demand, but also a more complex operating environment. Supply security, inventory planning, sourcing diversification and cost control will remain central to performance.

For advanced manufacturing customers, 5N Plus’ message is clear. Secure materials supply is now a competitive advantage, especially in sectors linked to semiconductors, renewable energy, aerospace and space infrastructure.

The Metalnomist Commentary

5N Plus’ results show that specialty materials companies are becoming supply-chain security providers, not just product suppliers. In semiconductor and space solar markets, reliability, qualification and sourcing resilience may matter as much as capacity expansion.

Brunp Battery Materials Project Expands CATL’s Recycling and LFP Supply Chain

Brunp Battery Materials

Brunp battery materials project development has advanced in Yichang, Hubei province, as Guangdong Brunp Recycling Technology broke ground on a 500,000 t/yr production complex. The project carries total investment of 6.1bn yuan, or about $840 million.

The new plant is designed to produce 300,000 t/yr of iron phosphate, 180,000 t/yr of nickel sulphate and 12,000 t/yr of cobalt sulphate. Construction is scheduled for completion in the second half of 2027.

Brunp battery materials project investment strengthens the upstream materials platform behind China’s battery industry. Brunp is a controlling subsidiary of CATL, the country’s largest battery producer, and focuses on recycling, resources and battery materials.

Yichang Base Builds Scale Across LFP and Recycling

The Yichang base will become a major integrated battery materials hub once the new project is operational. It will have 750,000 t/yr of iron phosphate capacity, 450,000 t/yr of lithium iron phosphate capacity and 500,000 t/yr of battery recycling capacity.

Brunp has already made several investments in Yichang since entering the city in 2021. The company launched a 450,000 t/yr LFP factory in December, reinforcing the site’s role in China’s expanding phosphate-based battery supply chain.

This matters because LFP batteries continue to gain share in electric vehicles and energy storage systems. Large-scale iron phosphate and LFP capacity gives CATL-linked supply chains stronger control over cost, material availability and recycling integration.

Recycling Capacity Deepens China’s Battery Materials Control

Brunp Recycling processed more than 200,000t of power batteries in 2025. The company now plans to raise total recycling and processing capacity to more than 1mn t/yr by 2030.

The strategy reflects a wider shift in battery materials sourcing. Recycling is becoming a strategic source of nickel, cobalt, lithium and other battery inputs, especially as governments and manufacturers seek lower-carbon and more secure supply chains.

The Yichang project also adds nickel sulphate and cobalt sulphate capacity, linking recycling with precursor material production. However, weaker upside in metals prices has limited buyer appetite in China’s black mass market, even as NCM payables edged higher in early March.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Brunp’s Yichang expansion shows how CATL is tightening control over the full battery materials loop, from recycling to LFP and sulphate production. The project also underlines China’s advantage in building scale across both primary materials processing and circular battery supply chains.

Nth Cycle Trafigura Battery Materials Deal Signals Scale-Up in Black Mass Refining

Nth Cycle

Nth Cycle Trafigura battery materials deal marks a significant step for recycled battery metals supply as the US critical metals refiner prepares to expand its refining footprint. Nth Cycle has signed a 10-year binding offtake agreement to supply Trafigura with battery materials valued at $1.1bn.

The agreement covers 2,000 metric tonnes of contained nickel in mixed hydroxide precipitate and 1,500 tonnes of lithium carbonate. These materials will be refined from 12,000 tonnes of black mass, reinforcing the growing commercial role of recycled feedstock in the battery supply chain.

The Nth Cycle Trafigura battery materials deal also gives Trafigura long-term exposure to recycled nickel and lithium units. That matters as battery manufacturers, automakers, and trading houses seek lower-carbon and more traceable alternatives to mined raw materials.

Modular Refining Model Targets Faster Battery Materials Capacity

Nth Cycle plans to establish new operations in South Carolina and the Netherlands, with production scheduled to begin in 2028. The dual-location strategy gives the company access to both North American and European battery supply chains.

The company’s modular refinery system is designed to reduce build time and capital intensity. This model could become important because conventional refining projects often face long development timelines, high upfront costs, and permitting delays.

Black mass refining is becoming a strategic bridge between battery recycling and primary raw material supply. By converting battery waste into mixed hydroxide precipitate and lithium carbonate, refiners can return critical metals into the battery value chain with less dependence on new mining projects.

Trafigura Offtake Strengthens Commercial Validation

The Nth Cycle Trafigura battery materials deal provides commercial validation for Nth Cycle’s refining technology and expansion plan. A 10-year offtake agreement with a major global trading house can support financing, customer confidence, and project execution.

Nth Cycle has also received a €7.5mn grant from the Netherlands’ National Growth Fund under the Critical Raw Materials Lion initiative. This support highlights Europe’s policy focus on domestic and regional critical raw materials capacity.

The agreement reflects a broader shift in battery materials markets. Recycled nickel and lithium are moving from pilot-scale sustainability claims toward bankable supply contracts. As a result, black mass is increasingly becoming an industrial feedstock rather than a waste stream.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This deal shows that battery recycling is entering a more serious commercial phase. The key challenge for Nth Cycle will be execution, because long-term offtake value only matters if modular refining can deliver consistent volume, quality, and cost performance.

Defence funding in Europe risks squeezing battery materials investment at EU Raw Materials Week

EU Defence

Defence funding in Europe risks squeezing battery materials investment, participants warned in Brussels. The debate surfaced at EU Raw Materials Week during investor and industry discussions. Defence funding in Europe risks squeezing battery materials investment as capital shifts toward security priorities. Therefore, the energy transition may face a tighter financing environment.

The European Commission is pushing defence spending through the ReArm Europe Plan. The plan aims to mobilise up to €800bn for defence investment. Meanwhile, the United States is backing military metals through funding and policy tools. As a result, critical raw materials markets are linking defence and clean energy strategy.

Investors follow defence narratives while battery projects face funding gaps

Investors are showing stronger interest in defence-linked opportunities. Demeter partner Antoni Troeich said money is flowing into defence. However, he also framed batteries and the energy transition as sovereignty issues. Defence funding in Europe risks squeezing battery materials investment if capital ignores EV supply chain scale.

Some investors react when they hear materials overlap both sectors. Troeich said investors became more interested after learning raw materials matter for defence. Meanwhile, battery projects still need long-duration capital and stable offtake. Therefore, developers must sharpen investment cases around scale and resilience.

Lithium demand scale still depends on EVs, not defence volumes

Lithium producers see potential for cross-sector partnerships. However, they warn defence demand cannot justify new plants alone. One producer said the EV market drives demand at scale. As a result, defence funding in Europe risks squeezing battery materials investment without replacing EV-led volume growth.

Co-operation also faces structural limits. Defence procurement is often secretive and specification-driven. Meanwhile, defence may require high-purity lithium or lithium metal grades. These grades do not always match mainstream battery industry needs. Therefore, collaboration will likely focus on niche refining and qualification pathways.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe should avoid framing defence and batteries as competing priorities. Meanwhile, dual-use refining and secure sourcing can serve both markets. Therefore, policymakers should align finance tools to unlock EV-scale projects with defence-grade options.

XTC New Energy LFP LMFP Capacity Expansion Targets Higher-Density Battery Materials

XTC New Energy

XTC New Energy LFP LMFP capacity will expand in Sichuan as the Chinese battery materials producer adds another 40,000 t/yr of lithium iron phosphate and lithium ferro-manganese phosphate production. The second-phase project will be built in Ya’an city and is expected to start production in June 2028.

XTC New Energy LFP LMFP capacity at the Ya’an plant will reach 80,000 t/yr after both phases are completed. The first phase already provides 40,000 t/yr of LFP capacity, while the new phase will add flexible LFP and LMFP output.

XTC New Energy LFP LMFP capacity expansion reflects China’s continued investment in lower-cost and manganese-enhanced battery chemistries. The project will be operated by subsidiary Ya’an XTC New Energy, with total investment expected at 743mn yuan.

The move comes as Chinese battery material producers position for growing power battery demand and greater interest in manganese-based cathode active materials.

LMFP Gains Momentum as Producers Seek Better Energy Density

LMFP is gaining attention because it can offer higher energy density than conventional LFP. This makes it attractive for battery makers seeking to improve driving range while keeping costs below higher-nickel chemistries.

However, LMFP still faces trade-offs. Batteries using LMFP cathode active material generally have shorter cycle life and lower charge-discharge efficiency than LFP batteries.

This means LMFP is not a simple replacement for LFP. Instead, it is likely to develop as a complementary chemistry for applications where higher energy density is more valuable than maximum cycle life.

The expansion also shows how manganese is becoming more important in battery materials. Manganese-based chemistries can reduce reliance on more expensive or supply-sensitive metals while supporting performance improvements.

For XTC, adding LMFP capacity gives the company more flexibility. It can serve established LFP demand while preparing for customers that want manganese-enhanced phosphate materials.

China’s Cathode Supply Chain Expands Into Manganese-Based Materials

XTC is not alone in expanding LMFP capacity. Several Chinese battery material producers are adding or building manganese-based phosphate projects.

Ningxia Hengchuang Nami began building the first phase of a 30,000 t/yr LMFP plant in Yinchuan in March. Hunan Yuneng, China’s largest LFP producer, is also building an LMFP materials plant.

Jiangxi Greatpower launched the first phase of a 20,000 t/yr LMFP plant in Pingxiang in January. These projects show that China’s battery materials industry is preparing for broader adoption of LMFP.

The trend is strategically important for the cathode supply chain. LFP has already become a major chemistry in electric vehicles and energy storage because of its cost advantage, safety and long cycle life.

LMFP could extend that platform by adding more energy density while preserving some of LFP’s cost and safety benefits. If technical limitations improve, LMFP may become a larger part of China’s battery chemistry mix.

For raw materials, the shift could support manganese demand in battery applications. It also reinforces China’s lead in scaling new cathode chemistries from pilot production to industrial capacity.

The Metalnomist Commentary

XTC’s Ya’an expansion shows that China’s battery materials race is moving beyond simple LFP scale. LMFP is becoming a serious development path because it offers a practical route to higher energy density without fully moving into costlier high-nickel systems.

Materion Clad Strip Ramp-Up Signals Recovery in Advanced Materials Production

Materion

Materion clad strip ramp-up is becoming a key recovery story in advanced materials production. The US-based company is increasing output at its precision clad strip facilities in the first quarter of 2026. The move follows a temporary production suspension in the fourth quarter because of material performance issues. As a result, Materion clad strip ramp-up now matters for both short-term operations and broader industrial demand.

This matters because the suspension hit one of Materion’s important business segments. Sales in its performance materials unit fell 30pc in the fourth quarter to $148.3mn. Full-year segment sales also declined 9pc to $675.9mn. Therefore, Materion clad strip ramp-up is directly tied to restoring lost momentum in a core materials business.

The broader company picture remains stronger than the segment disruption suggests. Total sales in 2025 rose 6pc to $1.8bn from 2024. Annual profit also climbed sharply to $74.8mn from $5.9mn. Consequently, Materion clad strip ramp-up is happening from a base of wider company resilience, not from broad operating weakness.

Precision Clad Strip Facilities Are Returning Gradually

Precision clad strip facilities will not return to full pace immediately. Management said the first quarter start will be slower as the ramp-up continues. However, the company expects production to increase further in the following quarter. As a result, Materion clad strip ramp-up is expected to be gradual rather than sudden.

That approach makes sense after a materials performance issue. Restoring production too quickly could create additional operational risk. A measured restart gives the company more control over quality and throughput. Therefore, precision clad strip facilities are likely to recover in stages, not all at once.

This recovery is important because clad strip products serve demanding end markets. Customers in electronics, automotive, defense, and other advanced sectors depend on reliable material performance. Meanwhile, any disruption in specialized strip production can ripple into downstream manufacturing schedules.

Defense and Semiconductor Materials Are Driving the Bigger Growth Story

Defense and semiconductor materials remain the stronger part of Materion’s overall growth profile. The company said business wins in semiconductors, space, defense, and automotive supported annual sales growth. That shows demand remains solid in several high-value industrial markets. As a result, Materion clad strip ramp-up is taking place alongside broader demand strength.

The defense business is especially important. Materion surpassed $100mn in defense sales in 2025 and secured $140mn in new defense orders. Semiconductor orders also rose 14pc during the year, excluding China. Therefore, defense and semiconductor materials are becoming increasingly important to the company’s earnings base.

This mix gives the company a more balanced outlook for 2026. Even if the precision clad strip recovery takes time, other segments are already performing well. Electronic materials sales rose 19pc to just over $1bn, while precision optics sales increased 7pc. Consequently, Materion clad strip ramp-up supports recovery, but it is not the only positive force in the business.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Materion’s update shows how important execution is in specialized materials manufacturing. The company already has strong demand in defense and semiconductors, but it still needs its clad strip operations back at stable output. If the ramp-up stays on track, Materion could enter 2026 with a much stronger mix of recovery and structural growth.

Global Solid-State Electrolyte Shipments Surge as Semi-Solid Batteries Scale

Solid state electrolyte

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments are rising rapidly as semi-solid batteries move toward vehicle adoption and full solid-state battery commercialisation advances. Chinese research institute EV Tank said shipments reached 4,100t in 2025, more than doubling from a year earlier.

The increase marks an important early-stage signal for the battery materials industry. Electrolytes are one of the core materials that determine the energy density, safety and commercial viability of solid-state batteries.

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments are still small compared with conventional lithium-ion battery materials. However, the growth rate shows that downstream producers are beginning to prepare for larger semi-solid and solid-state battery output.

EV Tank expects global solid-state electrolyte shipments to reach 229,000t by 2030. That would imply a compound annual growth rate of more than 120% from 2025 to 2030, making electrolytes one of the fastest-growing segments in advanced battery materials.

The forecast reflects both technological progress and industrial positioning. Battery producers, automakers and materials companies are now investing ahead of expected demand from electric vehicles, energy storage systems and high-end electronics.

Semi-Solid Batteries Create the First Commercial Demand Base

Semi-solid batteries are likely to provide the first meaningful demand base for solid-state battery electrolytes. EV Tank expects these batteries to begin vehicle adoption from 2026, ahead of full solid-state battery mass production.

This timing matters because semi-solid batteries can act as a bridge technology. They offer improved safety and performance compared with conventional liquid-electrolyte batteries, while avoiding some of the most difficult technical barriers facing all-solid-state cells.

Semi-solid battery growth is already supporting electrolyte shipments. These products still use electrolyte systems that may differ from fully solid-state designs, but they create early commercial demand for sulphide, oxide, polymer, halide and composite electrolyte materials.

Full solid-state batteries are expected to enter small-scale mass production from 2027. That stage will likely remain limited at first because large-scale production still faces technical, cost and qualification challenges.

The market therefore looks likely to develop in phases. Semi-solid batteries will drive early electrolyte consumption, while full solid-state batteries will gradually expand once production processes, interfaces and reliability improve.

Electrolytes are central to this transition. They influence ion conductivity, safety, cycle life, energy density and compatibility with electrodes. Any weakness in electrolyte performance can limit the entire battery system.

This is why electrolyte development is becoming a strategic battleground. Battery makers cannot scale solid-state technology only by changing cell design. They need stable, high-quality electrolyte materials that can be produced consistently at industrial scale.

Capacity expansion is accelerating in response. EV Tank expects producers with annual electrolyte capacity at the thousand-tonne level to emerge within the next one to two years.

That would mark a shift from laboratory and pilot-scale material production toward early industrial supply. It would also create a more competitive market among electrolyte producers seeking qualification with battery manufacturers.

For battery materials suppliers, this creates a new growth category. Electrolytes may become a higher-value segment within the battery chain, especially if producers can meet strict requirements for purity, particle control, stability and conductivity.

For automakers, the key issue is reliability. Vehicle adoption requires materials that can perform under harsh cycling, temperature and safety conditions. This means electrolyte suppliers must pass long qualification cycles before volume demand can fully develop.

Technology Routes and Cost Cuts Shape the Scale-Up

Solid-state battery electrolyte technology remains diversified, especially in semi-solid batteries. Sulphide, oxide, polymer and halide routes are developing in parallel, while both single-electrolyte and composite-electrolyte solutions are being adopted.

This diversity shows that the industry has not yet settled on a single dominant material route. Different technologies offer different advantages in conductivity, stability, manufacturability, cost and safety.

Sulphide electrolytes currently dominate the roadmap for full solid-state batteries. They offer high ionic conductivity and are widely viewed as one of the most promising routes for high-performance battery cells.

However, sulphide systems also face challenges. They require careful handling, moisture control and interface engineering. These factors can raise production complexity and slow commercial scale-up.

Oxide electrolytes offer strong chemical and thermal stability, but they can face processing and interface resistance challenges. Polymer electrolytes offer manufacturing flexibility, but often struggle with conductivity at room temperature. Halide electrolytes are gaining interest because of their electrochemical stability and potential compatibility with high-voltage cathodes.

Composite electrolyte solutions may become increasingly important. By combining material systems, producers can try to balance conductivity, flexibility, stability and manufacturability.

Cost reduction is also becoming a major commercial driver. EV Tank said improvements in material quality and production processes lowered costs across several technology routes in 2025.

Sulphide electrolyte costs fell by more than 35% during the year. This is significant because cost remains one of the biggest obstacles to wider solid-state battery adoption.

Lower electrolyte costs improve the competitiveness of solid-state batteries against conventional lithium-ion technologies. They also make it easier for battery makers to test commercial deployment in premium vehicles, high-performance energy storage and other demanding applications.

Still, cost reduction alone will not guarantee rapid commercialisation. The industry must also solve interface stability, dendrite control, manufacturing yield, pressure management and long-term cycle reliability.

This explains why some major automakers remain cautious. BYD chief scientist Lian Yubo has said solid-state batteries still face core technical bottlenecks and that liquid and solid-state batteries should develop as complementary technologies.

Great Wall Motor also does not expect large-scale commercialisation of all-solid-state batteries in the near term. This caution suggests that the market may grow strongly, but unevenly.

The commercial pathway is therefore not a simple replacement of liquid batteries. Conventional lithium-ion batteries, semi-solid batteries and full solid-state batteries are likely to coexist for years, each serving different cost and performance segments.

This has important implications for materials demand. Solid-state growth could increase demand for lithium metal, high-nickel cathodes, sulphur-based materials, oxides, halides and specialty chemical precursors. But it may not immediately reduce demand for conventional electrolytes, separators or liquid battery components.

The forecast of 229,000t of global solid-state electrolyte shipments by 2030 points to a large materials opportunity. But the final market size will depend on how quickly automakers adopt semi-solid batteries and how successfully full solid-state batteries move from demonstration to reliable mass production.

For supply chains, qualification will be decisive. Battery makers will not buy electrolyte materials only because capacity exists. They will need stable quality, competitive pricing, proven performance and reliable long-term supply.

For policymakers, solid-state batteries are increasingly tied to advanced manufacturing and energy security. Countries that control electrolyte technology and battery production could gain strategic advantage in next-generation electric vehicles and storage systems.

For the metals market, the key point is that battery innovation changes materials demand before full commercial adoption arrives. Producers begin scaling supply years before the technology reaches mass-market vehicles, creating early demand signals and investment cycles.

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments therefore offer a useful indicator of where advanced battery manufacturing is moving. The numbers remain small, but the growth curve is steep enough to attract capital, competition and supply-chain restructuring.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Solid-state electrolyte growth shows that next-generation battery competition is moving upstream into materials engineering. The market will expand quickly, but full solid-state batteries still need technical proof before they can reshape EV and energy storage supply chains at scale.

Jaguar Land Rover Backs Cyclic Materials in Rare Earth Recycling Expansion

Cyclic Materials

Cyclic Materials Secures Investment to Boost Rare Earth Processing in US and Europe

Canadian rare earth recycling start-up Cyclic Materials has secured a $2 million investment from InMotion Ventures, the investment arm of Jaguar Land Rover. This funding will support the launch of the company's first commercial rare earth element (REE) processing facilities in the United States and Europe. The investment extends Cyclic Materials’ Series B round to $55 million.

Expanding Rare Earth Recycling to Secure Supply Chains

Cyclic Materials is advancing its MagCycle and REEPure technologies to extract REEs from end-of-life electric vehicle (EV) motors, wind turbines, MRI machines, and data center waste. With less than 1% of REEs currently being recycled, increasing domestic processing capacity is crucial to reducing reliance on China, which dominates global REE processing. China’s export restrictions on rare earth technologies have heightened concerns about supply chain resilience.

Growing Investment in Critical Minerals Recycling

In September 2023, Cyclic Materials raised $53 million from key investors, including Microsoft, Hitachi, BMW i Ventures, ArcTern, and Fifth Wall. With InMotion Ventures' latest contribution, the company has raised over $85 million in equity financing. This funding will accelerate Cyclic Materials' North American and European expansion, refine its recycling processes, and enhance production capabilities.

Jaguar Land Rover’s investment aligns with its 2030 electrification strategy, which involves securing critical raw materials for battery repair, re-use, and recycling. The company is strengthening its upstream supply chain to support the transition to luxury electric vehicles.

Cyclic Materials has also partnered with Solvay, Vattenfall, Synetiq, and Vacuumschmelze to advance rare earth magnet recycling. The company operates Hub 100, a commercial demonstration facility in Kingston, Ontario, with an 8,000 t/yr MagCycle capacity and a 100 t/yr REEPure hydrometallurgical facility producing recycled mixed rare earth oxides (rMREO), nickel, and cobalt hydroxides.

US Critical Mineral Processing Funding Targets Domestic Battery Supply Chain

Critical Mineral

US critical mineral processing funding is moving into another major round as the Department of Energy prepares to allocate up to $500mn for processing, recycling, and derivative battery manufacturing projects. The funding opportunity is designed to support US-based projects that can strengthen domestic supply of critical minerals and battery materials.

The Department of Energy will target projects that process raw feedstocks, recycle critical materials, or manufacture battery materials and components. The agency specifically identified battery-related materials such as lithium, graphite, nickel, copper, and aluminum among its areas of focus.

US critical mineral processing funding is becoming a central tool in Washington’s effort to reduce dependence on offshore refining and battery material supply chains. The latest funding round also shows that the US is not only focused on mining, but on the midstream capacity needed to convert raw materials into usable industrial inputs.

DOE Funding Pushes Midstream Capacity Beyond Mining

Critical mineral processing remains one of the most difficult gaps in the US battery supply chain. Mining projects can expand raw material availability, but domestic industrial resilience depends on refining, chemical conversion, recycling, and component manufacturing.

The new funding opportunity will support projects that can process critical minerals from raw feedstocks and recycle valuable materials back into the supply chain. This approach reflects the growing importance of black mass, scrap, and secondary materials as strategic inputs for battery production.

DOE battery materials funding also gives policy support to companies working across lithium chemicals, graphite processing, nickel products, copper materials, aluminum inputs, and battery component manufacturing. These segments are essential for electric vehicles, grid storage, defense electrification, and industrial energy systems.

Battery Manufacturing Policy Enters Third Funding Round

The latest funding notice marks the third round in recent years under the DOE’s battery materials processing and battery manufacturing and recycling programs. In September 2024, the agency selected 25 projects to receive more than $3bn to expand domestic battery, component, and critical material supply.

The new $500mn opportunity extends that policy direction. It gives the US another mechanism to move from strategic mineral rhetoric toward physical processing capacity, especially in areas where China still dominates global refining and battery material production.

Applicants must submit non-binding letters of intent by 27 March, with full applications due by 24 April. The timeline signals that the DOE wants near-term project visibility and a faster pipeline of investable domestic capacity.

US critical mineral processing funding will be especially important for companies that can prove commercial readiness, feedstock security, and scalable production. The strongest projects will likely be those that connect raw material access with downstream battery customers and recycling loops.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The US is now treating processing capacity as the real bottleneck in critical minerals security. Funding can accelerate projects, but the strategic test will be whether supported companies can deliver cost-competitive, qualified material at industrial scale.

US Critical Materials Funding Targets Recycling, Refining and DLE Technologies

DOE (the Department of Energy)

US critical materials funding is moving deeper into domestic production and refining after the Department of Energy announced up to $69 million for new technologies and processes. The notice of funding opportunity, announced on 7 April, targets critical materials including rare earth elements.

The funding is designed to help move technologies from bench-scale innovation toward commercial deployment. That focus is important because the US critical materials funding gap is often not resource identification, but the ability to scale processing, refining and recovery technologies into reliable industrial supply.

The programme covers three main areas: recycling from manufacturing and end-of-life scrap, refining of gallium, germanium and silicon, and direct lithium extraction alongside critical material recovery from volcanic-hosted geothermal systems.

Recycling and Refining Move Higher on the US Supply Chain Agenda

The first funding area targets recycling from manufacturing scrap and end-of-life scrap. This could support recovery routes for valuable metals already present in electronics, magnets, batteries, industrial components and advanced manufacturing waste streams.

The second area focuses on refining gallium, germanium and silicon. These materials are strategically important for semiconductors, optics, solar technologies, defense systems, data infrastructure and advanced electronics.

US critical materials funding for these metals reflects growing concern over concentrated supply chains. China dominates several critical material processing routes, making domestic refining capability a central issue for industrial resilience and national security.

DLE and Geothermal Systems Add New Resource Pathways

The third topic area covers direct lithium extraction and exploration of critical materials and rare earth elements from volcanic-hosted geothermal systems. This could open new pathways for lithium and mineral recovery beyond conventional mining.

Direct lithium extraction remains strategically important because it may improve recovery efficiency, reduce land use and shorten production timelines compared with traditional brine evaporation. However, commercial scalability remains the decisive test.

The DOE said the $69 million opportunity is part of several programmes totalling nearly $1 billion. These initiatives aim to advance mining, processing and manufacturing technologies across the critical materials supply chain.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The US critical materials funding programme shows that Washington is now targeting the weakest links between laboratory success and industrial supply. The key test will be whether these grants create commercial refining and recovery capacity, not only promising pilot projects.

US Gallium Recovery Projects Target Domestic Supply Chain for Defense and Semiconductors

DOE(The US Department of Energy)

US gallium recovery projects will receive $5.4mn in funding from the Department of Energy as Washington tries to rebuild domestic supply for a metal critical to defense systems, semiconductors and advanced electronics. The funding will support five US-based projects under the Technology for Recovery and Advanced Critical-material Extraction – Gallium initiative.

The TRACE-Ga initiative is designed to prototype technologies that can recover gallium from US metal-processing feedstocks. This is important because the US is fully import-reliant for gallium and has not produced the metal domestically since 1987.

US gallium recovery projects are gaining urgency because gallium is essential for compound semiconductor materials, including gallium nitride. These materials support power electronics, radio-frequency devices, radar systems, satellite communications, fast chargers, LEDs and other high-performance technologies.

The funding is modest in scale, but strategically important. It signals that the US is no longer focusing only on mining new critical minerals. It is also trying to recover strategic metals from industrial by-products, waste streams and existing processing networks.

TRACE-Ga Funding Targets Recovery From Existing Feedstocks

The DOE award will support five companies working on gallium recovery technologies. Participants include PHNX Materials, Atlantic Alumina Company, Found Energy, Kunin Technologies and Indium Corporation.

The selection of companies shows how broad the recovery opportunity could become. Gallium is not usually mined as a primary product. It is commonly recovered as a by-product from other industrial processes, especially alumina and zinc-related supply chains.

This makes gallium recovery different from conventional mining. The key challenge is not only finding deposits, but identifying feedstocks where gallium exists in recoverable concentrations and developing technologies that can extract it economically.

Industrial waste refiner PHNX Materials could support recovery from complex waste streams. Atlantic Alumina Company brings relevance to alumina-linked feedstock. Found Energy adds an aluminum-related industrial angle, while Kunin Technologies focuses on mineral by-product recovery. Indium Corporation brings downstream metals refining and manufacturing expertise.

The TRACE-Ga initiative therefore targets the middle of the supply chain. It seeks to bridge the gap between laboratory recovery methods and scalable domestic production.

That gap matters because gallium supply is highly concentrated. China dominates primary gallium production and has used export controls to increase pressure on global buyers. For US defense and semiconductor supply chains, reliance on foreign gallium has become a clear strategic risk.

Domestic recovery could help reduce that exposure. Even if early projects produce limited volumes, they can prove process routes, identify feedstock partners and create the technical base for larger recovery systems.

The use of US metal-processing feedstocks also fits a wider circular materials strategy. Instead of waiting for new mines, the US can extract critical materials from industrial streams already moving through domestic facilities.

This could make recovery faster than new primary production. However, it still requires technical success, feedstock security, refining capability and customer qualification.

Gallium Nitride Demand Raises Strategic Pressure

Gallium’s strategic value has increased because of its role in gallium nitride and other compound semiconductor materials. Gallium nitride is widely used where high power, high frequency, efficiency and heat performance matter.

These applications are highly relevant to defense and advanced electronics. Radar, communications systems, satellite technologies, power conversion equipment and semiconductor devices all rely on materials where gallium can be difficult to substitute.

The DOE’s TRACE-Ga funding also sits alongside a larger notice of funding opportunity of up to $69mn. That programme targets technologies and processes that advance domestic production and refining of critical materials, including gallium and gallium nitride for semiconductor applications.

This shows that Washington is building a layered funding strategy. TRACE-Ga supports recovery prototypes, while broader DOE programmes aim to scale refining, alloying and advanced material production.

For the semiconductor industry, domestic gallium supply is not only a raw material issue. It is connected to wafer production, epitaxy, device manufacturing, packaging and defense procurement. A shortage or export disruption at the gallium stage can move through the entire compound semiconductor chain.

This is why gallium recovery matters even if volumes are small at first. Strategic materials often have low tonnage but high consequence. A reliable domestic supply stream can reduce procurement risk for critical systems.

The challenge will be commercialisation. Recovery from waste and by-products can be technically complex because gallium concentrations may be low and feedstock chemistry can vary. Companies must prove that their processes can recover gallium consistently, meet purity requirements and operate at competitive cost.

The US also needs downstream refining capacity. Recovering gallium-bearing material is not enough if the material cannot be refined into forms suitable for semiconductor and defense applications.

The DOE funding is therefore best understood as an early-stage industrial rebuilding tool. It does not immediately solve US gallium dependence, but it helps create the technologies and partnerships needed to rebuild supply.

The Metalnomist Commentary

US gallium recovery projects show that critical mineral security increasingly depends on recovering by-products from existing industrial systems. The strategic test will be whether TRACE-Ga can move beyond prototypes and create reliable domestic feedstock for gallium nitride, defense electronics and semiconductor manufacturing.

LB Titanium Dioxide Output Falls as Sponge and Battery Materials Expand

LB Titanium

LB titanium dioxide output fell in 2025 as weaker prices, slower demand and rising trade barriers pressured the global pigment market. China’s largest titanium producer reported titanium dioxide production of 1.28mn t, down 1.5% from a year earlier.

LB titanium dioxide output declined even as sales edged higher to 1.26mn t. Domestic sales accounted for 45% of volumes, while international sales made up 55%, showing that overseas markets remain critical to the company’s TiO2 business.

LB titanium dioxide output came under pressure from structural oversupply. New capacity entered the market, prices weakened and several domestic producers cut operating rates to protect margins.

The company also pointed to anti-dumping duties imposed by the EU, Brazil, Saudi Arabia and the Eurasian Economic Union, along with higher US tariffs on Chinese material. These measures have fragmented trade flows and made the global titanium dioxide market more difficult for Chinese exporters.

Titanium Sponge Offers a Stronger Counterweight

LB’s titanium sponge business moved in the opposite direction. Titanium sponge output rose by 2.3% on the year to 71,300t, while sales increased by 0.9% to 67,500t.

The stronger sponge result matters because titanium sponge sits closer to aerospace, industrial titanium mill products and high-performance alloy supply chains. It gives LB a more diversified titanium platform beyond pigment markets.

Titanium sponge prices were also firmer. Domestic 99.7% grade sponge prices averaged 49,665 yuan/t ex-works in 2025, up from 48,270 yuan/t a year earlier.

LB has 80,000 t/yr of titanium sponge capacity, the largest globally. That scale gives the company a major position in a market where feedstock security, product quality and downstream demand from titanium processors remain strategically important.

Titanium concentrate output fell by 3% to 1.45mn t, but LB did not sell concentrate externally. All concentrate was consumed internally to produce titanium dioxide and titanium sponge.

This internal use highlights the company’s integrated titanium value chain. LB can direct feedstock toward different downstream products depending on market conditions, although weak TiO2 demand still affects overall profitability.

Iron ore concentrate output fell more sharply, dropping by 18% to 3.04mn t. Sales decreased by 2.1% to 2.94mn t, showing softer performance in another mineral by-product stream.

Iron Phosphate Growth Signals Battery Materials Diversification

LB’s battery materials business showed much stronger momentum. Iron phosphate output jumped by 72% to 97,600t, while sales rose by 59% to 96,000t.

The growth was driven by firm demand from the lithium-ion battery sector. Iron phosphate is a key precursor for lithium iron phosphate cathode materials, which are widely used in electric vehicles and energy storage systems.

This diversification is strategically important. Titanium dioxide remains LB’s largest product line, but the pigment market is facing oversupply, trade restrictions and weaker pricing. Battery materials offer a different growth channel tied to China’s expanding LFP ecosystem.

LB has 100,000 t/yr of iron phosphate capacity and 50,000 t/yr of LFP capacity. It also has 25,000 t/yr of graphite anode capacity and 50,000 t/yr of graphitisation capacity.

That product base positions LB across titanium, zirconium and battery materials. The company is no longer only a titanium dioxide producer, even though it remains the world’s largest TiO2 producer with 1.51mn t/yr of capacity.

The 2025 results show a clear split in the business. Titanium dioxide is under pressure from oversupply and trade action. Titanium sponge is holding stronger. Iron phosphate is growing with battery demand.

For LB, the industrial challenge is to manage a mature pigment business while expanding higher-growth materials platforms. Its integrated mineral base gives it flexibility, but market conditions across TiO2, sponge and battery materials are moving in different directions.

The Metalnomist Commentary

LB’s results show how Chinese titanium producers are moving beyond pigment exposure into sponge and battery materials. The strategic value lies in feedstock integration, because companies that can shift internal mineral flows between TiO2, titanium sponge and battery precursors will be better positioned in volatile markets.

DMEGC Magnet Output Falls as Competition and Export Controls Pressure Sales

DMEGC

DMEGC magnet output fell in 2025 as tougher competition and China’s export restrictions on some rare earth permanent magnets weighed on sales. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics produced 221,690t of magnetic materials during the year, down 2.5% from 2024.

DMEGC magnet output declined even as the broader Chinese magnet market benefited from stronger demand in new energy vehicles, smart appliances, data centres and consumer electronics. The company’s magnetic material sales fell by 5.9% to 218,282t, while inventories rose by 22% to 19,074t.

DMEGC magnet output weakness shows that rising end-market demand does not guarantee growth for every producer. Fiercer competition in China and overseas, combined with tighter controls on medium and heavy rare earth magnet exports, created pressure across the company’s magnet business.

China imposed export restrictions in April 2025 on permanent magnets containing seven medium and heavy rare earth elements. These included dysprosium, terbium, yttrium, lutetium, gadolinium, scandium and samarium.

The restrictions affected a sensitive part of the magnet supply chain. Dysprosium and terbium are especially important for high-performance magnets used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, robotics, aerospace systems and defence-related applications.

Magnetic Materials Lag as DMEGC Revenue Rises Elsewhere

DMEGC’s overall business still expanded in 2025 despite weaker magnet volumes. Revenue rose by 22% on the year to 22.6bn yuan, while profit increased by 1.3% to 1.85bn yuan.

The strongest revenue growth came from photovoltaic products. Sales from that segment rose by 29% to 14.3bn yuan, making solar products a major earnings driver for the group.

Revenue from magnetic materials increased by 5% to 4bn yuan, even though output and sales volumes declined. This suggests that pricing, product mix or higher-value material sales partly offset weaker physical shipments.

Lithium battery revenue also increased. Sales rose by 12% to 2.72bn yuan, while component sales climbed by 30% to 995mn yuan.

The result shows DMEGC’s advantage as a diversified materials and energy technology supplier. Weakness in one product line did not prevent group revenue growth, because photovoltaics, batteries and components supported the wider business.

Still, the magnet segment remains strategically important. DMEGC had designed magnetic materials capacity of 300,000 t/yr by the end of 2025, placing it among China’s leading magnetic material producers by sales scale.

The company’s battery and component capacity also reached 23GW and 21GW, respectively, while lithium battery output capacity stood at 8GWh. This gives DMEGC exposure to several electrification markets, including solar, batteries, motors and electronic components.

The inventory increase in magnetic materials deserves attention. Rising inventories during a year of falling sales can signal slower customer offtake, tougher competition or weaker export channels.

Export restrictions may have added to that pressure. When overseas buyers face licensing uncertainty, shipment delays or compliance risk, purchasing patterns can change even if underlying demand remains strong.

This is particularly important for rare earth permanent magnets. Buyers in automotive, robotics, wind power and electronics supply chains require stable delivery, traceability and qualification. Policy disruption can therefore affect procurement decisions quickly.

NEVs, Appliances and Data Centres Support Long-Term Magnet Demand

China’s magnet demand outlook remains positive despite DMEGC’s weaker 2025 volume performance. China produced 1.62mn t of magnetic materials in 2025, accounting for about 80% of global output.

This total included 750,000t of permanent magnetic ferrite, 600,000t of soft magnets and 270,000t of rare earth permanent magnets. The scale confirms China’s dominant role across both low-cost and high-performance magnet supply chains.

New energy vehicles remain one of the strongest demand drivers. China’s automobile output rose by 10% to 34.5mn units in 2025, while NEV production increased by 29% to 16.6mn units.

NEVs consume more magnetic materials because electric drivetrains, sensors, power steering, braking systems, pumps and comfort systems all require motors and magnetic components. As vehicles become more automated, intelligent and comfort-oriented, magnet intensity per vehicle is likely to increase.

Smart home appliances are another major demand source. China’s output of air conditioners, refrigerators and washing machines reached 266.97mn, 109.24mn and 125.17mn units, respectively, in 2025.

These appliances support demand for soft magnets and ferrite materials used in motors, compressors, power electronics and control systems. Energy efficiency standards and inverter technologies can further raise the need for higher-performance magnetic components.

Data centres are becoming a newer growth channel. Global server shipments rose by 1.9% to 16.3mn units in 2025, while AI server shipments increased by 25% to 2.04mn units.

Cooling systems in data centres require fans, motors and magnetic components. As AI infrastructure expands, heat management becomes more important, adding another source of demand for rare earth permanent magnets and soft magnetic materials.

Consumer electronics also supported the market. Global smartphone shipments rose by 2% to 1.25bn units, while personal computer shipments increased by 9.2% to 280mn units.

This broad demand base gives Chinese magnet producers a strong long-term market. However, it also attracts capacity expansion and intensifies competition. Producers must now compete not only on volume, but also on product quality, export compliance, heavy rare earth efficiency and downstream qualification.

The market is therefore entering a more selective phase. Producers with strong customer relationships, stable rare earth supply, advanced magnet technologies and diversified end-market exposure will be better positioned.

DMEGC’s 2025 results reflect that transition. Demand for magnets is rising, but policy controls, competition and inventory pressure can still weaken individual company performance.

The Metalnomist Commentary

DMEGC’s results show that China’s magnet market is growing, but not evenly. The next competitive divide will come from export-control management, high-performance magnet capability and access to reliable rare earth feedstock.

Indium Phosphide Exports Become China’s New Chokepoint in AI Data Centre Supply Chain

AI data centre

Indium phosphide exports have become a strategic pressure point in the global AI data centre supply chain as China’s licensing controls delay shipments of a material essential for high-speed optical chips. The restrictions are exposing a new vulnerability in AI infrastructure: the physical materials behind silicon photonics and optical interconnects.

The issue has moved quickly from a specialist semiconductor concern to a high-level trade and industrial policy problem. Coherent, a key optical components supplier backed by Nvidia, warned in early May that indium phosphide shortages were already affecting the market. Its chief executive then joined a US business delegation to China as companies sought relief from export licence delays.

Indium phosphide exports matter because AI data centres are moving beyond copper-based interconnects. As AI workloads grow, hyperscalers need faster, lower-latency and more energy-efficient data transmission between processors, accelerators, switches and optical modules. Indium phosphide is one of the core materials enabling that shift.

The material is used in high-speed optical chips, lasers, detectors and photonic components. These devices support the optical links that move huge volumes of data across AI clusters. Without reliable indium phosphide substrates and wafers, the expansion of advanced AI data centre networks could slow.

China’s control over indium phosphide exports shows that critical materials policy is becoming more granular. Beijing no longer needs to restrict only rare earths or finished technology products. It can also influence upstream compounds, substrates and wafers that determine whether advanced semiconductor supply chains can scale.

Export Controls Expose a Hidden Bottleneck in Silicon Photonics

Silicon photonics has become a critical technology for AI infrastructure because it allows data to move through light rather than electrical signals. This reduces energy use per bit and supports the bandwidth required by large AI systems.

But silicon photonics is not only a silicon story. The most advanced optical systems often require compound semiconductor materials such as indium phosphide, gallium arsenide, gallium nitride and germanium-based compounds. Indium phosphide is especially important for lasers and high-speed optical devices.

This creates a difficult supply chain problem. AI companies, hyperscalers and chipmakers are racing to scale optical modules, but one of the key substrate materials remains highly concentrated. China is the world’s largest indium producer, accounting for about 70% of global output in 2024.

That concentration became more serious after China introduced export restrictions on indium phosphide in February 2025. Since then, licence delays have created backlogs for companies that manufacture or source InP substrates from China.

AXT, one of the world’s largest indium phosphide substrate producers and a major supplier to Coherent, said export permits were its most significant challenge. The company manufactures most of its InP substrates in China and only received its first permits last June. It still faces a large order backlog.

The effect has spread beyond individual suppliers. Coherent, Lumentum, VPEC and LandMark Optoelectronics all sit inside the optical components ecosystem that depends on reliable substrate supply. When permit delays hit upstream InP material, the impact moves through wafers, chips, optical modules and AI data centre equipment.

Prices show the severity of the shortage. Since China introduced export restrictions, the average price of a 6-inch indium phosphide wafer has surged by 250% to about $5,000. That price increase reflects both physical scarcity and the strategic premium attached to non-disrupted supply.

The supply squeeze also comes at a time of aggressive photonics investment. Nvidia announced $2bn investments each in Coherent and Lumentum in March. Marvell Technology also moved into photonics through its acquisition of Celestial AI, reflecting stronger demand for optical technology in AI computing.

These investments show where the industry is heading. AI infrastructure needs optical interconnects to manage power, latency and bandwidth. But China’s indium phosphide controls mean that materials availability could become a gating factor for deployment.

Companies are trying to respond. Coherent plans to double its InP wafer capacity at its Texas plant this year and more than double it again by the end of 2027. US photonics firms are also seeking supply from non-Chinese producers such as Sumitomo Electric Industries.

However, capacity additions are slow. New substrate plants can take two to three years to bring online. Qualification cycles are also long because optical chipmakers cannot easily switch substrate suppliers without testing performance, reliability and consistency.

This makes the shortage difficult to solve quickly. Even if new capacity is announced, it may not arrive fast enough to meet near-term AI data centre demand. Meanwhile, many non-China producers already consume part of their own output internally, reducing the amount available to the broader market.

China’s Materials Chokepoint Strategy Strengthens Domestic Producers

China’s indium phosphide export controls are creating both pressure and opportunity. They restrict global supply, but they also support domestic Chinese substrate producers that are expanding capacity.

Yunnan Germanium, Guangdong Xiandao and Zhuhai Dingtai Xinyuan are among China’s leading domestic InP substrate players. Their role is becoming more important as Beijing uses materials controls to strengthen strategic leverage across semiconductor and AI supply chains.

Yunnan Germanium has already moved to expand. The company announced a 189mn yuan investment in April to raise production capacity to 450,000 single InP wafers annually. Its shipments of InP wafers rose by 74% in 2025, showing fast domestic market growth.

Guangdong Xiandao is also expanding through its subsidiary Guangdong Xianrui. The project is expected to produce 40 t/yr of indium phosphide crystals, which are used as raw material for substrates.

These investments fit a broader pattern. China is not only defending control over upstream critical materials. It is also building downstream processing capacity in higher-value compound semiconductor materials.

However, Chinese producers may not immediately solve the global shortage. Some are still seeking export approvals, and any overseas shipments may be limited. Domestic demand remains a priority, especially as China builds its own AI, optical communications and semiconductor ecosystem.

AXT

Supplier qualification creates another barrier. Companies such as Coherent and Lumentum are unlikely to switch easily from established suppliers. Coherent relies heavily on AXT, while Lumentum sources mainly from Sumitomo and JX Advanced Metals. New suppliers must pass demanding qualification cycles before they can enter critical optical chip supply chains.

This gives China’s export controls a long-lasting effect. Even if alternative suppliers exist, the market cannot instantly redirect demand. The bottleneck is not only production volume. It is qualified, high-quality, customer-approved substrate supply.

The strategic lesson is clear. AI supply chains are not only exposed to advanced chips, GPUs and packaging capacity. They also depend on a deep materials stack that includes indium, phosphorous chemistry, InP crystals, substrates, wafers, lasers, detectors and optical modules.

This is why indium phosphide exports have become so important. AI data centre buildouts need more optical links as clusters grow larger. Copper interconnects face limits in speed, distance and energy consumption. Photonics offers a solution, but only if the materials chain can scale.

For the US and its allies, the response will likely require more than emergency licence negotiations. It will require investment in indium recovery, InP crystal growth, substrate manufacturing, wafer capacity and long-term offtake agreements. It may also require strategic stockpiles for high-purity indium and compound semiconductor substrates.

The issue also strengthens the case for recycling and secondary recovery. Indium is often produced as a by-product, making primary supply difficult to expand quickly. Recovering indium from industrial scrap, displays, semiconductors and related waste streams could become more important if export controls persist.

For AI data centre developers, the risk is timing. Demand for optical modules is accelerating now, while new ex-China capacity may not fully arrive until 2027 or later. That mismatch could raise costs, delay deployments and intensify competition for qualified photonics suppliers.

The market may therefore see a split. Companies with secured InP supply will be better positioned to support hyperscaler demand. Companies exposed to licence delays, qualification bottlenecks or spot-market wafers may face higher costs and delivery risk.

The Metalnomist Commentary

China’s control over indium phosphide exports shows that the AI race is becoming a materials race. The next bottleneck may not be only GPUs or power supply, but the compound semiconductor substrates needed to move data fast enough inside AI clusters.