EU Ferro-Titanium Imports Hit Highest Level Since 2024 as Russian Supply Dries Up

Ferro Titanium

EU ferro-titanium imports rose to their highest level in more than a year in the first quarter, supported by robust demand from steel mills and cored-wire producers. The increase also reflected a market shift as Russian receipts effectively disappeared and European suppliers captured more share.

EU ferro-titanium imports reached 8,431t in January-March, up 19% from a year earlier and 13% from the previous quarter. The total was the highest since the fourth quarter of 2024, when Russian material was still moving into the bloc in significant volumes.

EU ferro-titanium imports were concentrated in Estonia, Poland, Latvia and the UK. These destinations took a combined 5,119t, equal to 61% of the first-quarter total, up from 51% a year earlier.

The figures show how sanctions, scrap availability and steel-sector buying are reshaping the European ferro-titanium market. Demand has improved, but the supply base has changed sharply.

Sanctions Redirect Russian Ferro-Titanium Toward Asia

Russian ferro-titanium flows into Europe have effectively stopped since sanctions were imposed on Russian ferro-alloys in December 2024. That removed a major historical source of supply from the European market.

Before sanctions, the EU was still receiving 2,000-3,000 t/quarter of Russian ferro-titanium. Those flows helped lift imports to 11,661t in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Now, Russian material has shifted toward Asia. China has become the dominant buyer of Russian ferro-titanium, with imports from Russia rising to a record 3,855t in the first quarter, up from 816t a year earlier.

This shift matters because Europe still needs titanium units for steel and cored-wire production. Ferro-titanium is used to add titanium to steel, where it supports deoxidation, grain refinement and stabilisation in selected grades.

Market participants have said some Russian material may still be reaching Europe through third countries in circumvention of sanctions. That claim highlights the continuing importance of origin control, documentation and compliance in ferro-alloy trade.

Non-EU imports, excluding the UK, reached 1,388t in the first quarter, up from 1,179t a year earlier. India was the leading non-EU supplier, shipping 426t, double the year-earlier level but down 38% from the previous quarter.

Scrap Tightness Supports Ferro-Titanium Price Recovery

Titanium scrap availability became another pressure point. EU imports of unsanctioned titanium scrap from Russia fell sharply to just 37t in the first quarter, all into Germany.

This is a major change for the Baltic route. Estonia imported no Russian titanium scrap in the quarter, compared with an average of 601 t/quarter last year.

Lower scrap availability matters because titanium scrap is a key feedstock for ferro-titanium production. Tighter scrap supply can raise production costs and reduce prompt availability for alloy producers.

European standard-grade ferro-titanium prices averaged $4.70-4.97/kg Ti dp/df Rotterdam in the first quarter, down from $5.68-6.02/kg Ti a year earlier. However, the market strengthened through the quarter.

Prices opened at $4.30-4.60/kg Ti and closed at $4.85-5.30/kg Ti. The rally was initially triggered by the insolvency of Austrian trader LL-Resources, although its ferro-titanium subsidiary LLR-Ecotech said operations were unaffected.

The price rise then gained support from stronger mill demand under long-term contracts, prompt buying and quarterly spot enquiries. Tighter titanium scrap availability also added cost pressure.

The rally continued into the second quarter, suggesting that buyers remain sensitive to reduced Russian availability and constrained scrap flows.

For Europe, the key issue is not only volume. The region must secure compliant titanium units for steelmaking while avoiding sanctioned material and managing higher feedstock costs.

The first-quarter data therefore point to a more regionalised ferro-titanium market. Europe is relying more on domestic and approved suppliers, while Russian material is increasingly absorbed in Asia.

EU, Fe-Ti Import

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s ferro-titanium market is becoming a compliance-driven supply chain. The real advantage will go to producers that can secure clean titanium scrap, prove origin and deliver reliable alloy supply into steel and cored-wire demand.

Derichebourg Recycling Results Rise on Non-Ferrous Strength and Scrap Policy Support

Chhattisgarh, Ferro‑alloy

Derichebourg recycling results improved in the first half of the company’s 2025-26 financial year as stronger non-ferrous demand, higher prices and increased metal volumes lifted earnings. The French recycling group reported Ebitda of €177.8mn for October-March, up almost 10% from a year earlier.

Derichebourg recycling results show how metal recyclers are benefiting from two linked forces. Non-ferrous scrap demand remains firm, while European steel policy is encouraging mills to source more feedstock from within the region.

Derichebourg recycling results also point to continued momentum in the second half. The company expects April-September performance to be comparable to the first half and forecasts full-year Ebitda of €350mn-370mn.

The market responded positively to the filing, with Derichebourg’s share price rising above €10 from €9.50 after the results were released.

Non-Ferrous Metals Drive Earnings Growth

Non-ferrous metals were the main earnings driver. Derichebourg sold 357,100t of non-ferrous metals in the first half, up 4.4% from a year earlier.

Revenue from the non-ferrous segment rose by nearly 20% to €1bn. The average non-ferrous price was almost 15% higher than in the same period last year.

Copper sales were especially strong, rising by 17%. Aluminium sales, excluding ingots, increased by 10%, supported by firm industrial demand.

However, the picture was not uniformly positive. Aluminium ingot sales fell by 15%, while lead sales dropped by 4%, mainly because of weaker demand from the automotive industry.

This split matters for recyclers. Copper and aluminium scrap remain exposed to electrification, infrastructure and industrial manufacturing, while automotive weakness can still pressure selected downstream products.

Derichebourg’s non-ferrous performance shows that scrap is becoming a strategic raw material, not only a waste recovery business. Buyers increasingly need reliable recycled metal flows for cost control, carbon reduction and supply security.

CBAM and Steel Quotas Support Ferrous Scrap Outlook

Ferrous scrap revenue fell by 5% to €649.9mn because lower average prices offset higher volumes. Derichebourg sold 2.13mn t of ferrous scrap, up 2.2% from a year earlier.

European mills increased scrap purchases ahead of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism coming into force in January. CBAM has added complexity to imported steel and raw material calculations, pushing some steelmakers toward European suppliers.

The company also expects ferrous scrap demand to strengthen after the EU introduces new steel quotas and customs duties in July. These measures could support regional scrap flows by making local feedstock more attractive.

Turkey also contributed to stronger scrap demand as steel production increased. That remains important because Turkish mills are major seaborne scrap buyers and can influence European collection and export markets.

Derichebourg is also expanding geographically. The company agreed to acquire Germany’s Scholz Recycling, which operates 180 sites including joint ventures across Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia, Austria and Romania.

The deal is expected to close in the second half of 2026. It will strengthen Derichebourg’s recycling network in eastern Europe, where its presence has been smaller.

The acquisition fits the wider market direction. European recyclers are scaling up as policy, carbon rules and industrial demand make scrap supply more valuable.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Derichebourg’s results show that recycling is becoming a policy-supported industrial supply chain. CBAM, steel trade measures and non-ferrous demand are turning scrap networks into strategic assets for European metals security.

NioCorp Scandium Supply Plan Targets Latent Demand From Elk Creek

NioCorp

NioCorp scandium supply plans could reshape a small but strategically important market if the company brings its Elk Creek critical minerals project in Nebraska into production. The US junior miner says reliable scandium availability could unlock demand that has remained dormant because customers lack secure supply.

NioCorp scandium supply would come from a polymetallic carbonatite ore body that also contains niobium, titanium and rare earths. The company plans to produce neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium oxides alongside its main niobium product.

NioCorp scandium supply is important because scandium can strengthen and lighten aluminium alloys when added in small quantities. This gives the metal potential relevance for automotive, aerospace, defence and lightweight structural applications.

Construction at Elk Creek is expected to begin in the third or fourth quarter, once financing is secured. The company expects three years of construction, followed by ramp-up, with a full year of production targeted by 2030.

Elk Creek Financing Links Niobium, Scandium and Rare Earths

NioCorp is seeking a loan of around $780mn from the US Export-Import Bank. That financing could cover up to 65% of total capital expenditure through debt.

The company’s 2022 feasibility study estimated total capital expenditure at $1.2bn for underground and surface facilities. NioCorp has raised more than $500mn over the past 14 months and may still need another $200mn-400mn in cash support.

All planned production is covered under a 10-year commercial agreement with Traxys. This gives the project a route to market across its diversified product stream.

The diversified ore body reduces dependence on a single commodity. Niobium remains the main focus, but scandium, titanium and rare earths can broaden revenue and reduce exposure to one price cycle.

Niobium supply risk is a major strategic issue. Brazil produces about 95% of global niobium supply, while the US and EU import all the niobium they need.

That concentration creates geopolitical vulnerability. NioCorp argues that Brazil could use niobium as leverage in the same way China has used rare earths in trade and strategic disputes.

Elk Creek therefore matters for more than one mineral. It could give the US domestic access to niobium, scandium and rare earth oxides from a single integrated project.

Scandium Demand Case Depends on Reliable Domestic Supply

The global scandium market is currently tiny, with only about 30-35t produced annually. NioCorp plans to produce 100t, which has raised concerns that new supply could overwhelm demand.

The company takes the opposite view. It argues that applications are waiting on the shelf because users do not trust the availability of scandium supply.

NioCorp estimates latent demand could reach about 3,000 t/yr if secure supply becomes available. It is working with companies including Aston Martin and Jaguar Land Rover to demonstrate scandium-aluminium alloy performance.

This is the key industrial point. Scandium demand cannot develop without reliable supply, but reliable supply is difficult to finance without visible demand.

NioCorp is also building a downstream scandium chain in the US. The company plans to produce high-purity scandium oxide, scandium metal and scandium aluminium master alloy.

That approach fits defence and industrial supply-chain needs. Customers need not only mined material, but qualified products that can enter alloy systems and manufacturing routes.

Rare earth processing adds another layer of complexity. NioCorp says it has developed in-house capability to produce high-purity rare earth oxides, supported by staff with decades of solvent extraction experience.

Execution will decide the project’s market impact. Financing, construction, separation technology, customer qualification and downstream partnerships must all align before Elk Creek can become a meaningful US critical minerals platform.

The Metalnomist Commentary

NioCorp’s strategy shows why critical minerals demand often depends on supply confidence first. If Elk Creek reaches production, scandium could move from a niche laboratory metal into a practical aluminium alloying tool for lightweight manufacturing.

Energy Security Investment Rises as IEA Sees $3.4 Trillion Global Spend

IEA

Energy security investment is accelerating as the war in the Middle East and the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz push governments and companies to diversify supply. The IEA expects global energy investment to reach $3.4 trillion in 2026.

Energy security investment is now shifting strongly toward electricity, grids, storage, renewables, nuclear, low-emissions fuels and efficiency. The IEA expects around $2.2 trillion to flow into these areas, compared with about $1.2 trillion for fossil fuels.

Energy security investment also carries direct metals implications. More spending on grids, storage, solar, wind, nuclear and electrification will support demand for copper, aluminium, electrical steel, lithium, nickel, rare earths and other critical materials.

The IEA described the current crisis as the largest energy security crisis the world has faced. It expects decision-makers to prioritise resilience, diversification and trusted energy partners.

Electricity Spending Becomes the Core Security Response

Electricity-related investment is becoming the dominant theme in global energy spending. The IEA expects investment in electricity supply and infrastructure to reach nearly $1.6 trillion in 2026.

That figure rises to about $2 trillion when end-use electrification is included. This shows that energy security is no longer only about oil and gas supply. It is increasingly about reliable power systems.

Power grids will be central to this shift. Grid expansion, storage deployment and electrification require large volumes of copper, aluminium and electrical equipment.

Renewables will also remain a major investment channel. The IEA expects renewables spending to reach around $665bn in 2026, including $365bn for solar, $200bn for wind and $75bn for hydropower.

Annual renewables spending growth has moderated because of lower technology costs and policy changes in China and the US. However, low-emissions sources still account for more than 70% of global power investment.

The metals signal is clear. Energy security policy is reinforcing the same material demand base already supported by decarbonisation. Grid metals, battery materials and renewable energy inputs remain structurally important.

Fuel Supply Shock Keeps Fossil Investment Alive

Fossil fuel investment is also rising in selected areas. Total fossil fuel supply investment is expected to exceed $1 trillion in 2026, returning to 2024 levels.

Oil investment is expected to fall for a third consecutive year to below $500bn. Long project lead times, supply-chain limits, offshore rig tightness and uncertainty over the duration of the price spike are limiting near-term spending outside the Middle East.

Natural gas investment is moving in the opposite direction. The IEA expects gas investment to reach $330bn, the highest level in a decade, supported by LNG export projects and demand from data centres.

Coal investment is also expected to rise to $180bn, the highest level since 2012. Around 70% of that spending is expected in China, while some Asian countries may keep existing coal-fired power plants running longer to protect energy security.

The IEA said past investments in renewables, nuclear, efficiency and electrification have already improved energy security in major fuel-importing regions. It estimated that China, the EU, Japan, South Korea, southeast Asia and India avoided around $260bn in fossil fuel imports in 2025.

The conflict is also forcing a search for new energy export routes to reduce reliance on the Strait of Hormuz. Repair costs for damaged energy infrastructure are expected to reach tens of billions of dollars.

For industrial markets, the result is a more complex energy outlook. Electricity investment is rising fast, but gas and coal remain part of short-term security planning. That mix will shape metals demand, energy costs and industrial competitiveness.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The IEA’s outlook shows that energy security and electrification are now the same investment story. The winners will be supply chains that can deliver grids, storage, renewables and critical minerals at scale while reducing exposure to fragile fuel routes.

LKAB Critical Minerals Industrial Park Advances Swedish Rare Earth and Phosphorus Supply

LKAB

LKAB critical minerals industrial park plans have taken a major step forward after the Swedish mining group received a key environmental permit for its planned facility in Lulea. The project will produce phosphorus and rare earths from residual streams generated by iron ore mining.

LKAB critical minerals industrial park development is strategically important because it turns mining waste into usable industrial feedstock. The plant will process apatite concentrate from LKAB’s existing iron ore operations in Gallivare.

LKAB critical minerals industrial park output will include rare earths, phosphorus for fertilizer production and gypsum for the construction industry. That gives the project relevance across clean technology, agriculture and building materials.

The Land and Environmental Court granted the permit to construct the Lulea industrial park, moving LKAB closer to a new value chain based on by-product recovery from iron ore production.

Iron Ore Residues Become Critical Mineral Feedstock

LKAB will build an apatite processing plant at its iron ore mine to produce apatite concentrate. That concentrate will then be transported to Lulea for further processing.

This structure is important because it uses an existing mining base rather than depending only on a new standalone rare earth mine. It could help shorten the route from waste stream to commercial critical mineral product.

Rare earths are essential for permanent magnets, electric motors, wind power, defence systems and advanced industrial technologies. Phosphorus is also strategically important because it supports fertilizer production and food security.

Recovering these materials from residual iron ore streams improves resource efficiency. It also reduces the amount of potentially valuable material left unused in mining waste.

LKAB started construction of a demonstration plant in January. The plant is expected to begin operations later in 2026 and will test the technology needed to extract phosphorus and rare earths from iron ore production streams.

EU Strategic Status Strengthens Project Importance

Several LKAB investments have been named strategic projects under the EU Critical Raw Materials Act. These include the industrial park, a mine in Malmberget and the Per Geijer iron ore deposit in Kiruna.

The Per Geijer project contains a major rare earth deposit, giving LKAB a broader role in Europe’s critical minerals strategy. The company is increasingly positioned at the intersection of iron ore, rare earths, phosphorus and industrial policy.

For Europe, the project matters because rare earth supply remains highly concentrated outside the region. Domestic processing from Swedish mining streams could support supply diversification and reduce exposure to external bottlenecks.

The phosphorus element also strengthens the case for the project. Fertilizer supply has become more strategically important as governments reassess food security, energy costs and import dependence.

The Lulea permit does not eliminate execution risk. LKAB still needs to prove processing performance, scale-up economics and reliable product quality from residual streams.

However, the permit moves the project from concept toward implementation. It also shows how Europe can use existing mining operations to recover critical materials that were previously treated as by-products or waste.

The Metalnomist Commentary

LKAB’s project shows that Europe’s critical minerals opportunity is not only in new mines. Some of the fastest supply gains may come from reprocessing industrial waste streams already sitting inside established mining systems.

EU Silico-Manganese Prices Unlikely to Rally Despite Filled Quotas

Silico-Manganese

EU silico-manganese prices are unlikely to rise sharply despite the rapid exhaustion of tariff-free import quotas for Indian material and supply from other developing countries. Weak end-user demand, existing stock coverage and summer maintenance at steel mills are limiting the price impact.

EU silico-manganese prices did move higher after the third safeguard quota period opened on 18 May. Importers tried to pass duty costs through to consumers, lifting prices by €30/t on 21 May.

EU silico-manganese prices still face resistance from buyers. Many large steel consumers already secured annual contracts or imported material before the safeguards took effect, leaving limited spot demand in the market.

The result is a tighter import structure without a strong demand shock. Quota exhaustion is raising costs for importers, but it has not yet created the kind of physical shortage needed to force a major price rally.

Filled TRQs Raise Import Costs but Demand Remains Covered

Importers submitted 41,993t of Indian silico-manganese for clearance on the first day of the new quota period. That exceeded the available Indian quota of 31,959t by 10,034t.

Only 76% of the submitted Indian material was allocated inside the quota. The rest had to clear as out-of-quota material, exposing importers to higher costs under the EU safeguard mechanism.

The safeguard system combines country-specific tariff-rate quotas with a variable duty on excess imports. The duty is calculated against a price threshold, effectively creating a minimum import price.

For silico-manganese, that minimum import price is €1,392/t. This is well above the recent European delivered market assessment of €1,080-1,130/t.

That gap creates immediate pressure on traders holding out-of-quota material. One trader said the duty impact on part of his cargo would raise his average import cost by about €120/t across the full shipment.

Some suppliers have increased offers by around €50/t and are holding material while they assess market direction. But buyers are not accepting higher prices quickly because cheaper unsold units remain available in smaller volumes.

The timing also weakens the price case. European mills typically reduce activity during the summer maintenance period, lowering near-term consumption of manganese alloys.

Safeguards Shift Trade Flows While CBAM Alters Alloy Choices

The EU introduced safeguards on silico-manganese, ferro-manganese, ferro-silicon and silico-magnesium in November to protect European alloy producers from lower-cost third-country imports.

Silico-manganese has attracted more import activity than some other alloys. The quota for “other countries” was exhausted in both the second and third periods, while the current 18,956t quota was filled by 21 May.

Norway’s quota has also been closely watched. Its second-period quota was exhausted in April, but the third-period quota still had a large remaining balance as of 22 May.

Zambian material also remains available within quota. This gives importers some alternative supply routes, even as India and other-country quotas fill quickly.

Ferro-silicon and ferro-manganese quotas have not been filled. This shows that the safeguard impact is uneven across the ferro-alloy market.

CBAM is also changing trading behaviour. Silico-manganese is not subject to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, while high-carbon ferro-manganese carries additional administrative and compliance burdens.

That has made some traders more comfortable importing silico-manganese than ferro-manganese. Even when prices are close, lower bureaucracy can make silico-manganese more attractive from a trading perspective.

Ferro-manganese prices are receiving some support from CBAM-related caution, but liquidity and demand appear stronger in silico-manganese. This could keep trade flows focused on silico-manganese until buyers’ inventories fall.

The main market impact may therefore arrive in autumn. By then, end-user stocks could be lower, summer maintenance will have passed and importers may face tighter replacement costs under the safeguard regime.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU safeguard system is already raising import costs, but weak steel demand is preventing a sharp silico-manganese rally. The real test will come after summer, when mills return and buyers need to replace stocks under a more expensive import structure.

EU Mexico Trade Agreement Opens Clean Tech and Critical Materials Opportunities

EU, Mexico

EU Mexico trade agreement signing marks a major update to a commercial relationship already worth around €100bn/yr in goods and services. The revised deal aims to remove tariffs and non-tariff barriers while creating new opportunities in clean technology, critical raw materials and agri-food trade.

EU Mexico trade agreement provisions will eliminate almost all high Mexican tariffs on EU imports. The affected sectors include machinery, mineral fuels, cars, car parts and a wide range of agri-food products.

EU Mexico trade agreement rules also include legally binding commitments on environmental protection and climate change. This gives the deal a strategic industrial angle beyond conventional tariff reduction.

The interim trade agreement is expected to move faster than the wider modernised global agreement. It needs European Parliament approval and qualified-majority approval from EU member states, rather than ratification by all 27 countries.

Clean Technology and Raw Materials Gain Strategic Relevance

The agreement could strengthen EU-Mexico cooperation in clean technology and critical raw materials. This matters as Europe seeks more diversified supply chains for energy transition equipment, electric vehicles, industrial machinery and advanced manufacturing.

Mexico is already a major manufacturing base linked to North American automotive and industrial supply chains. Better EU access could support machinery, components and clean technology exports into a market positioned between Europe and the US.

The deal also includes strict rules of origin, including for electric vehicles. EU officials said these rules are designed to prevent circumvention and avoid the agreement becoming a backdoor for Chinese production.

That detail is important. As tariffs, subsidies and local-content rules reshape global EV trade, rules of origin are becoming a core tool of industrial policy.

For European manufacturers, clearer access to Mexico may support exports of vehicles, parts, machinery and clean technology systems. For Mexican producers, greater access to the EU could strengthen trade in food, consumer products and selected industrial goods.

Tariff Cuts Combine With Climate and Circular Economy Commitments

Mexico will remove tariffs on key European exports including pork, dairy, cereals, fruit and pasta. Sensitive products will receive limited access through tariff-rate quotas.

The agreement also gives EU exporters broader quota access for dairy, beef, poultry and pork products. In return, Mexican producers will gain more liberalised access to the EU for products including coffee, fruit, chocolate and agave syrup.

Alongside the trade deal, both sides signed a circular economy declaration covering climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution, including plastics. This adds sustainability language to the commercial framework.

The agreement requires both parties to uphold international climate treaties, including the Paris Agreement. It also includes a dedicated dispute settlement procedure.

For metals and industrial supply chains, the wider message is clear. Trade agreements are increasingly combining market access, climate obligations, origin rules and supply-chain security.

The EU is using trade policy to support clean technology, critical raw materials cooperation and industrial competitiveness. Mexico gains deeper access to one of the world’s largest consumer markets while strengthening its role in global manufacturing networks.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EU-Mexico deal shows how trade policy is becoming a supply-chain security instrument. The rules of origin for electric vehicles may prove as important as the tariff cuts, especially as Europe tries to protect clean technology markets from indirect Chinese competition.

EU 2026 Growth Forecast Cut as Energy Shock Hits Industrial Outlook

EU energy

EU 2026 growth forecast has been cut to 1.1% as the European Commission warned that the US-Iran war has created a new energy shock, lifted inflation risk and weakened economic sentiment across the bloc.

EU 2026 growth forecast was lowered by 0.3 percentage points from the previous projection of 1.4%. The downgrade reflects the sharp rise in energy costs since late February and the renewed pressure on households, manufacturers and public finances.

EU 2026 growth forecast matters for metals and industrial supply chains because higher gas and oil prices directly affect production costs, margins and demand visibility. Energy-intensive sectors such as aluminium, steel, chemicals, fertilizers and glass remain especially exposed.

The Commission expects EU growth to recover to 1.4% in 2027, while eurozone growth is forecast at 1.2%. But the near-term outlook remains fragile as the energy shock continues to reshape inflation and investment decisions.

Higher Gas and Oil Prices Weigh on European Competitiveness

Energy prices have risen sharply since the outbreak of the conflict. The Commission said gas prices increased by 50% and crude oil prices by 65% between 27 February and the 29 April cut-off date.

The outlook assumes average TTF gas futures prices will be 47% higher in 2026 and 32% higher in 2027 than in the previous forecast. That creates a heavier cost base for European industry.

For manufacturers, the impact is immediate. Higher gas, power and fuel costs reduce competitiveness against producers in regions with cheaper energy.

This is especially important for metals. European smelters, refiners and rolling mills already face pressure from imports, carbon costs and weak demand. Another energy shock could delay restocking and weaken investment appetite.

Inflation is also expected to rise. EU headline inflation is forecast to increase to 3.1% in 2026 from 2.5% in 2025, before easing to 2.4% in 2027.

That inflation path limits policy flexibility. Governments may need to support vulnerable consumers and industries, but public finances are already under pressure.

The EU general government deficit is expected to widen to 3.6% of GDP by 2027, up from 3.1% in 2025. This reduces the room for broad stimulus and increases the importance of targeted support.

Growth Gap Widens Across the EU

The energy shock is affecting member states unevenly. Ireland is forecast to contract by 1.2%, while major economies such as Italy, Germany and France are expected to grow only modestly.

Germany’s growth is forecast at 0.6%, France at 0.8%, Italy at 0.5% and the Netherlands at 1%. These figures point to weak momentum across several core industrial economies.

Southern and eastern Europe show stronger projections. Spain is forecast to grow by 2.4%, Lithuania by 3%, Poland by 3.5% and Malta by 3.7%.

The gap matters because Europe’s industrial recovery will not be uniform. Regions with stronger growth may support construction, infrastructure and manufacturing demand, while slower economies could weigh on metals consumption.

The Commission also warned of a downside scenario in which EU-wide growth falls to just 0.7% this year. That risk depends partly on how quickly oil and gas supply from the Mideast Gulf can normalise.

EU economy commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis said Europe should respond by further reducing reliance on imported fossil fuels and keeping fiscal support temporary and targeted.

That message reinforces the strategic link between energy security and industrial competitiveness. Europe has reduced the energy intensity of economic output by about 44% since 1995, but the latest shock shows that import dependence still carries major economic risk.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s growth downgrade is an industrial warning, not just a macroeconomic revision. The bloc cannot protect metals, manufacturing and clean-energy supply chains without faster domestic energy deployment and lower exposure to imported fossil fuels.

Terrafame Scandium Recovery Study Could Create Europe’s First Domestic Supply

Terrafame

Terrafame scandium recovery plans could give Europe its only domestic scandium production source if a new project at the company’s Sotkamo operations in eastern Finland advances. The Finnish metals producer has launched a pre-feasibility study to assess scandium recovery from existing nickel and zinc production streams.

Terrafame scandium recovery would use the company’s current hydrometallurgical circuits, rather than requiring a standalone scandium mine. That gives the project a potentially lower-risk route because Terrafame already processes polymetallic ore and recovers multiple valuable metals.

Terrafame scandium recovery is strategically important because scandium supply remains extremely limited and heavily concentrated in China. Beijing controls around 85% of global supply and tightened export controls on the metal last year.

The study is expected to be completed by the end of 2026. If the project moves forward, Terrafame could target production in 2029.

Existing Circuits Could Lower Development Risk

Terrafame already produces battery-grade nickel, cobalt and copper. It also recovers uranium as a by-product from the same polymetallic ore system.

Adding scandium recovery to existing process streams could improve the value of Terrafame’s hydrometallurgical platform. It would also show how critical minerals can be extracted from established operations without developing entirely new mines.

This matters because scandium is usually produced in very small volumes as a by-product. Reliable recovery depends on chemistry, process control, impurity management and market qualification.

If successful, Terrafame could become a strategic supplier to European customers seeking non-China scandium. That would support supply-chain resilience for aerospace, aluminium alloys, solid oxide fuel cells and advanced materials.

The project also fits Europe’s wider critical raw materials agenda. The EU needs more domestic and allied sources of small-volume metals that support high-value industrial applications.

China Dominance Keeps Scandium Strategically Sensitive

Global scandium production remains limited at around 40-45 t/yr, while consumption reached about 60t in 2025. That small market size makes the supply chain highly sensitive to export controls and project delays.

China’s dominant position has increased interest in alternative sources. Export restrictions have made scandium more relevant to buyers that need secure material for advanced alloy and energy applications.

Several projects globally could increase supply over the next decade, including developments by NioCorp, Rio Tinto and Sunrise. Combined, these projects could lift global supply to 150-250 t/yr if they reach production.

That potential increase has raised some oversupply concerns. However, scandium demand may grow once buyers have more confidence in long-term availability.

This is a common problem for small critical materials markets. Customers hesitate to design around a material if supply is scarce, but producers struggle to invest before demand is proven.

Terrafame’s project could help break part of that cycle in Europe. A Finnish scandium source would not transform the market alone, but it could give manufacturers a more secure regional option.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Terrafame’s scandium study shows how Europe can extract more critical value from existing polymetallic operations. The opportunity is not only new mining, but smarter recovery of strategic by-products already moving through industrial circuits.

EU CRMA Strategic Projects Delay Raises Questions Over Critical Minerals Execution

the Critical Raw Materials Act

EU CRMA strategic projects are facing a likely delay as Brussels postpones the next batch of designations under the Critical Raw Materials Act. The announcement was initially expected between mid-May and June, but market sources now expect the process to run into autumn.

EU CRMA strategic projects are intended to accelerate domestic and allied supply chains for critical minerals. The strategic label can give projects faster permitting and better access to EU financing.

EU CRMA strategic projects matter because Europe has set ambitious 2030 targets for extraction, processing and recycling. Any delay risks slowing investment decisions at a time when the bloc is trying to reduce dependence on concentrated foreign supply chains.

The European Commission selected 60 projects in the first round across the EU and partner countries. The second round drew 161 applications, showing strong industry interest but also increasing administrative complexity.

Battery and Rare Earth Projects Dominate Applications

The second round of applications shows where Europe’s supply-chain priorities are concentrated. Of the 161 applications, 95 came from inside the EU and 66 from outside.

Battery-related projects dominated the list with 75 applications. This reflects Europe’s continued effort to build supply chains for lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, graphite and other battery materials.

Rare earths were another major focus, with 21 applications. These projects are strategically important because Europe remains highly dependent on China for rare earth separation, metals, alloys and permanent magnets.

The strategic label is expected to help selected projects access financing under the Resource Action Plan and benefit from accelerated permitting. That support is important because critical minerals projects face high capital costs, long timelines and uncertain market economics.

However, the delay shows that project selection is not simple. The EU must assess technical readiness, strategic value, permitting status, financing needs, environmental standards and supply-chain contribution.

For developers, uncertainty over designation timing can affect financing discussions, offtake negotiations and investment decisions. A project may be commercially promising, but delays in policy support can slow its path to construction.

Europe’s Raw Materials Targets Face Execution Risk

The CRMA sets clear 2030 goals. The EU wants domestic extraction to cover at least 10% of annual consumption, processing to cover at least 40%, and recycling to cover at least 25%.

These targets are ambitious because Europe has limited mining capacity in several critical minerals and remains weak in key midstream stages. Processing and refining remain the hardest gaps to close.

The first round of strategic projects gave the market a positive signal. But industry participants are now questioning whether the mechanism is delivering meaningful progress quickly enough.

The European Court of Auditors warned in February that the EU risks missing its raw materials targets. It pointed to unclear selection criteria and weak data as major concerns.

Transparency has also become a pressure point. Non-governmental organisations and legal groups have challenged the process, arguing that citizens have not received enough disclosure.

This creates a difficult balance for Brussels. The EU wants to accelerate strategic projects, but it must also maintain public trust, environmental credibility and clear selection standards.

The delay is therefore more than an administrative issue. It tests whether Europe can turn critical minerals policy into bankable industrial capacity before global competition locks up capital, feedstock and customers.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The CRMA’s strategic project label is valuable only if it accelerates real investment. Europe has identified the right bottlenecks, but delays in selection and financing risk turning industrial strategy into another slow policy process.

Metlen Gallium Project Positions Greece as New EU Critical Materials Hub

Metlen Gallium Project

Metlen gallium project approval gives Greece a stronger role in Europe’s effort to build secure supplies of critical raw materials. The Greek industrial group has secured government approval for its strategic investment to develop gallium production alongside expanded bauxite mining and alumina refining.

Metlen gallium project benefits will include grants and tax incentives totalling around €118mn. These incentives come on top of Metlen’s planned €300mn investment in the gallium production project.

Metlen gallium project development is integrated into Aluminium of Greece operations in central Greece. The structure allows gallium to be recovered as a by-product of alumina refining, linking critical minerals supply to an existing aluminium value chain.

The project matters because gallium is essential for semiconductors, defence systems, artificial intelligence applications and photovoltaics. Europe’s dependence on imported gallium has become more exposed since China imposed export controls in 2023.

Gallium Recovery Strengthens Europe’s Midstream Supply

Metlen produced gallium for the first time in January and plans to scale output over the next two years. Production is expected to continue rising in 2026, with an additional 5-10t forecast for 2027.

The company aims to reach full capacity of around 50 t/yr by 2028. At that level, Greece could become one of the largest gallium producers outside China.

The output could also be sufficient to cover current European import requirements. That would make the project strategically important for Europe’s semiconductor, defence and clean technology sectors.

Gallium recovery from alumina refining is especially significant because it adds value to an existing industrial process. Instead of relying only on new mines, Europe can recover critical materials from established aluminium operations.

This approach improves supply-chain efficiency. It also shows how by-products from major metals industries can become strategic feedstocks for advanced manufacturing.

EU Incentives Back Critical Raw Materials Security

The project has been approved under Greece’s Strategic Investments framework. It is also included under the Clean Industrial Deal State Aid Framework, which supports clean energy, industrial decarbonisation and clean technology.

The European Investment Bank has approved €90mn in financing to support the gallium facility and modernisation of upstream bauxite mining. This gives the project both national and EU-level policy support.

The investment aligns with Europe’s effort to reduce dependence on China for critical minerals. China dominates global gallium production, and its export controls have tightened supply and pushed prices higher.

For the EU, the Metlen project provides more than gallium volume. It creates a domestic industrial route from bauxite and alumina into critical semiconductor materials.

That model could become important for other by-product metals. Europe has limited time to build resilient supply chains, so projects connected to existing industrial assets may offer faster results than standalone greenfield developments.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Metlen’s gallium project shows how Europe can turn existing aluminium infrastructure into critical minerals capacity. The strategic lesson is clear: by-product recovery may become one of the fastest routes to reducing dependence on China.

Aluminium Supply Security Overtakes Sustainability as Middle East Disruption Tightens Metal

EGA, Adel Abubakar

Aluminium supply security has become the top concern for consumers after the Iran war disrupted Middle East output and exports. Buyers are still weighing sustainability, but securing enough metal has moved ahead of carbon footprint in commercial discussions.

Aluminium supply security is now being treated as the foundation for any long-term sustainability strategy. Consumers cannot prioritise low-carbon sourcing if they cannot first secure reliable volumes for production.

Aluminium supply security concerns have intensified as Middle East disruption tightens availability and changes procurement behaviour. The shift shows how quickly physical supply risk can override environmental preferences in an energy-intensive metal market.

The change does not mean sustainability has disappeared. It means consumers are now reassessing how much premium they can pay for greener material when supply is constrained and costs are rising.

Supply Risk Changes the Aluminium Buying Conversation

Aluminium consumers are moving from carbon-first procurement toward resilience-first procurement. Environmental performance remains important, but volume security is now the immediate priority.

This shift reflects the role of the Middle East in global aluminium supply. The region is a major source of primary aluminium, and disruptions can quickly affect availability, premiums and downstream planning.

For buyers in packaging, automotive, construction and industrial manufacturing, the first requirement is continuity. If metal availability becomes uncertain, production planning, customer deliveries and inventory strategies take priority over sustainability targets.

Hydro’s comments underline this change. Sustainability remains on the priority list, but cost and availability have become more prominent in buyer discussions.

Emirates Global Aluminium framed the issue more directly, saying resilience is now the focus. That message captures the current market mood: buyers want supply that is dependable before they refine their carbon strategy.

CBAM Leaves Carbon Pressure Dependent on Customers

The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism has entered into force, but it does not fully solve aluminium’s carbon-accounting problem. The mechanism does not cover Scope 2 emissions, which include electricity use.

That omission matters because power supply is the largest driver of aluminium’s carbon footprint. Primary aluminium is highly electricity-intensive, so carbon intensity depends heavily on the energy source behind each smelter.

As a result, sustainability pressure still depends heavily on customer requirements rather than regulation alone. Buyers that need low-carbon aluminium will continue to demand it, but others may prioritise security and cost during supply disruption.

This creates a more complicated market for low-carbon aluminium. Producers with cleaner power still have a strategic advantage, but consumers may be less willing to pay a strong green premium when physical supply is tight.

The broader implication is clear. Low-carbon aluminium remains a long-term trend, but it must now compete with resilience, availability and price stability in customer procurement decisions.

For aluminium producers, the best position will be to offer both. Buyers will increasingly prefer suppliers that can deliver reliable volumes, competitive pricing and credible carbon performance at the same time.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The aluminium market is showing that sustainability cannot stand alone when supply becomes uncertain. The next premium will belong to producers that combine low-carbon credentials with reliable, geopolitically resilient supply.

 

Outokumpu Stainless Steel Deliveries Rise as EU CBAM Supports Local Demand

Outokumpu

Outokumpu stainless steel deliveries rose sharply from the previous quarter after the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism began applying to imports at the start of the year. The Finnish stainless steel producer shipped 465,000t in January-March, up 27% from the previous quarter.

Outokumpu stainless steel deliveries were still down 1% from a year earlier, showing that the recovery remains uneven. But the quarterly increase suggests CBAM is starting to shift some demand toward local European production.

Outokumpu stainless steel deliveries are expected to rise by up to 10% in the second quarter. The company is benefiting from European buyers reassessing imports as carbon-related costs begin to affect non-EU supply.

The result highlights the industrial importance of scrap-based stainless steel production. CBAM could improve the competitiveness of lower-carbon European producers if importers face higher carbon costs.

CBAM Gives European Stainless Producers a Demand Tailwind

CBAM imposes a carbon levy on imports from outside the EU. This changes the cost comparison between imported stainless steel and local European material.

For Outokumpu, the mechanism supports demand for European scrap-based stainless production. Scrap-based production generally carries a lower carbon footprint than more emissions-intensive routes.

European stainless shipments reached 324,000t in the first quarter, up 2% from a year earlier. This suggests regional demand held up better than some other markets.

Shipments to the Americas fell by 5% to 148,000t. However, the Americas business still delivered much stronger earnings because of higher average selling prices.

The commercial message is clear. Volume growth is beginning to appear in Europe, but pricing power remains stronger in the Americas.

Ferro-Chrome Volumes Rise but European Margins Weaken

Outokumpu’s ferro-chrome shipments rose by 15.8% year on year to 110,000t. Strong demand in Europe and the US supported the increase.

Ferro-chrome remains essential for stainless steel production because chromium provides corrosion resistance. Higher ferro-chrome shipments therefore show stronger activity across stainless and alloy supply chains.

Group adjusted Ebitda rose by 33% on the year to €65mn. The improvement was driven mainly by the Americas business, where Ebitda climbed to €52mn from €11mn.

But the earnings mix was uneven. Ferro-chrome Ebitda fell by nearly 30% to €30mn, while the European stainless segment posted negative Ebitda of €13mn, down from positive €5mn a year earlier.

Outokumpu attributed weaker European profitability to lower average selling prices and lower fixed-cost absorption. This shows that CBAM may support volumes before it fully restores margins.

The first-quarter result therefore sends a mixed signal. European demand is improving, but pricing and cost absorption still need to recover for the regional stainless business to regain strength.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Outokumpu’s quarter shows that CBAM is beginning to change stainless steel trade behaviour. But the policy’s real test is whether it can improve European producer margins, not only redirect demand toward local supply.

 

EU EV Transition Faces Energy Cost and Trade Policy Pressure

EU energy

EU EV transition plans are facing growing pressure from high energy costs, tougher global competition and a regulatory model that industry leaders say may be weakening Europe’s automotive position. Speakers at the FT Future of the Car Summit warned that Europe must rethink how it competes with China and other industrial economies.

EU EV transition policy has relied heavily on regulation, including the planned 2035 phase-out of new internal combustion engine car sales. But carmakers and suppliers argue that regulation alone cannot deliver a competitive electric vehicle industry if energy prices, subsidies and supply-chain costs remain unfavourable.

EU EV transition challenges are becoming more visible as Chinese automakers gain share in Europe, southeast Asia and Latin America. Chinese producers have built cost-competitive EV platforms through subsidies, domestic competition, supply-chain control and fast industrial scaling.

The debate matters for metals because slower or more expensive electrification can reshape demand for lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, copper, aluminium and rare earth magnets. Automotive materials demand will still grow, but the path may become less direct and more exposed to policy choices.

China’s EV Scale Forces Europe to Rethink Trade Strategy

European automotive suppliers are calling for a more realistic approach to global competition. The industry is facing rivals that operate under different labour, subsidy and industrial policy conditions.

China has become one of the world’s strongest EV exporters. It accounted for around 40% of global EV exports in 2024, while leading Chinese brands have expanded aggressively with lower-cost, technology-rich vehicles.

This creates a competitive problem for European carmakers. Europe has focused on setting strict emissions targets, while China has focused on making EVs cheaper, scalable and export-ready.

Several industry executives now argue that collaboration may become unavoidable. Western manufacturers may need to partner with Chinese or other international competitors that already have a technological lead in EV platforms, batteries, software and power electronics.

This could change European supply chains. Rather than developing every technology internally, carmakers may increasingly combine European assembly and branding with externally sourced EV systems.

That strategy could support faster electrification, but it also creates dependence on imported components, battery materials and processed inputs. It may help automakers compete on cost, but it does not solve Europe’s strategic materials vulnerability.

Energy Costs Could Slow Consumer Adoption and Metals Demand

High charging and energy costs are another major barrier to Europe’s EV push. If consumers face much higher charging costs than drivers in China or other regions, the economic case for EV adoption weakens.

This is critical because EV demand is highly sensitive to total ownership cost. Batteries may become cheaper, but charging costs, highway tariffs and energy price volatility can still shape consumer decisions.

For battery metals, this matters directly. Slower EV adoption would reduce the speed of demand growth for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese, especially in full battery electric vehicles with large battery packs.

Copper and aluminium remain better positioned across multiple automotive pathways. EVs require copper for wiring, motors, charging systems and power electronics, while aluminium supports lightweighting, battery enclosures and structural components.

However, Europe’s automotive metals demand will increasingly depend on which technology mix wins. Full BEVs support larger battery metals demand, while hybrids and lower-cost EV platforms could shift consumption toward smaller batteries, more electronics and continued use of conventional automotive materials.

The policy challenge is therefore industrial as much as environmental. Europe must reduce emissions while keeping manufacturing competitive, securing raw materials and lowering energy costs for consumers.

If Europe cannot align regulation, energy prices and trade strategy, its EV transition could become a market for imported vehicles rather than a platform for domestic industrial growth.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Europe’s EV problem is not only about regulation or consumer demand. It is about whether the region can build a cost-competitive industrial system around energy, materials, technology and trade before Chinese EV platforms define the market.

Battery Metals Demand Faces Slower Path as Hybrid Vehicle Growth Extends

Battery Metals

Battery metals demand could face a slower growth path as carmakers and suppliers expect hybrids and range extenders to remain important for longer than earlier electric-only transition models assumed. Speakers at the FT Future of the Car summit said vehicle decarbonisation should be measured by emissions reduction, not only battery electric vehicle share.

Battery metals demand remains structurally supported by electrification. However, a longer hybrid phase could reduce near-term demand intensity for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese because hybrid vehicles use smaller battery packs than full battery electric vehicles.

Battery metals demand assumptions are therefore becoming more complex. Automotive electrification is still progressing, but the industry is moving toward a mixed powertrain future rather than a simple shift from combustion engines to full BEVs.

Horse Powertrain chief executive Matias Giannini said half of passenger vehicles could still be produced with some form of combustion or hybrid powertrain by 2040. That outlook would keep investment flowing into efficient hybrid systems alongside EV platforms.

Hybrid Growth Changes the Battery Raw Materials Curve

Hybrid vehicle growth could temper the pace of battery raw material demand without reversing electrification. Hybrids and range extenders still require electric motors, inverters, wiring and batteries, but their battery packs are much smaller than those used in BEVs.

This matters most for nickel. High-nickel NCM and NCA batteries are closely tied to longer-range BEVs, where larger packs are needed to deliver performance and driving range.

A slower BEV ramp-up could delay some of the nickel sulphate demand growth that has supported investment cases for new battery-grade nickel projects. It could also affect cobalt and manganese demand in cathode chemistries exposed to full EV penetration rates.

Lithium remains supported across almost every electrification pathway. Still, a longer hybrid transition could slow the rate at which large-format BEV batteries absorb lithium units.

The shift does not mean automotive metals demand will weaken across the board. Hybrids use more copper than conventional combustion vehicles because they require electric motors, power electronics and more complex wiring systems.

Continued hybrid and combustion production also supports aluminium castings, stainless steel, exhaust components and engine-related materials. Meanwhile, BEV growth still supports aluminium lightweighting, copper wiring, charging infrastructure and battery materials.

The result is a less linear automotive metals outlook. Battery metals may grow more slowly than aggressive BEV scenarios suggest, while broader automotive metals consumption remains supported by platform complexity and mixed powertrain production.

Policy Flexibility Could Reshape European Metal Demand

European suppliers are pushing for more flexibility in the EU regulatory framework. Current policy remains heavily weighted toward full electrification through tailpipe emissions targets.

The EU targets a 100% reduction in tailpipe emissions from new cars and vans from 2035. That effectively ends new combustion engine sales unless future exemptions are created.

Industry participants increasingly want a more technology-neutral route. They argue that hybrids, range extenders, renewable fuels and lower-carbon manufacturing should contribute to emissions reduction alongside BEVs.

This policy debate matters for metals. Battery material demand depends heavily on BEV penetration, average pack size and chemistry choice.

If Europe allows a longer role for hybrids and range extenders, lithium-ion battery capacity demand per vehicle could grow more slowly. That would affect demand forecasts for lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese.

Chinese EV and hybrid technology is also improving quickly. This puts pressure on European and US automakers to share development costs across BEV, hybrid and range-extender platforms.

For suppliers, the strategic issue is flexibility. Companies tied only to high-growth BEV battery assumptions may face demand timing risk, while suppliers serving copper, aluminium, stainless steel, electronics and hybrid systems may benefit from a broader platform mix.

The automotive transition is still real, but the material demand path is becoming more diversified. Metals markets must now track powertrain mix, not only EV sales headlines.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Hybrid growth does not weaken the energy transition, but it changes the metals timing. Battery metals demand will still rise, yet copper, aluminium and hybrid-related materials may capture more value if automakers choose a longer mixed-powertrain route.

Pax Silica Initiative Gains Norway as Western Supply Chains Tighten Around AI and Semiconductors

Pax silica

Pax Silica initiative membership has expanded with Norway joining the US-led framework for artificial intelligence, semiconductors and critical raw materials security. The move adds a European partner with low-carbon power, industrial metals capacity and growing critical minerals relevance.

The Pax Silica initiative has become part of Washington’s effort to reduce dependence on China in critical minerals, semiconductor supply chains and AI infrastructure. Norway’s accession strengthens the coalition’s European minerals, energy and capital base.

The Pax Silica initiative now includes countries with complementary strengths in mining, processing, technology, energy, finance and advanced manufacturing. That mix is important because strategic supply chains increasingly require more than mineral deposits alone.

Norway’s ambassador to the US, Anniken Huitfeldt, is expected to sign the initiative, giving Norway a formal role in a US-backed economic security framework.

Norway Adds Low-Carbon Metals, Capital and Rare Earth Potential

Norway brings several advantages to the coalition. The country has a long-established aluminium and ferro-alloys industry, access to low-carbon power and a growing policy focus on critical raw materials.

Its role has also become more relevant because of work on the Fen rare earth deposit in southern Norway. Rare earths are central to permanent magnets, defence systems, electric motors, wind turbines and advanced electronics.

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund also gives the country strategic capital relevance. In critical minerals, financing capacity can be as important as geology because new projects require long development timelines, technical qualification and patient capital.

Norway said Pax Silica could give domestic companies stronger access to advanced technology value chains. This matters for suppliers that want to connect local raw materials, clean power and industrial capabilities with AI, semiconductor and defence-linked markets.

The country is also aligning its wider policy with key partners through the EU Critical Raw Materials Act and European Chips Act. That creates a bridge between European industrial policy and the US-led supply-chain framework.

Supply-Chain Blocs Reshape Mineral Investment Logic

The industrial significance of Pax Silica lies less in immediate metal flows and more in policy direction. Western governments are building supply-chain blocs that link raw materials, processing, capital and end-use manufacturing across allied jurisdictions.

This could affect future investment decisions in rare earths, aluminium, silicon-related materials, battery metals and other inputs tied to semiconductors and AI infrastructure.

The framework also reflects a shift in how critical minerals projects are evaluated. Access to technology partners, downstream customers, public financing and geopolitical alignment may increasingly determine which projects advance.

For Norway, membership strengthens its position in the emerging western critical minerals architecture. For the wider market, it reinforces the idea that supply security is becoming a structured policy goal rather than a simple procurement choice.

This trend will matter for metals producers, refiners, traders and manufacturers. Companies that can operate inside trusted supply-chain blocs may gain better access to capital, offtake support and advanced technology customers.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Norway’s entry into Pax Silica shows that critical minerals strategy is now merging with AI, semiconductor and economic security policy. The next phase of mineral competition will be defined by blocs that combine geology, capital, clean energy and downstream demand.

Ferroglobe Silicon Shipments Fall as European Plants Face Import Pressure

Ferroglobe

Ferroglobe silicon shipments fell in the first quarter after the company suspended production across its European silicon metal plants in October. The decline shows how weak demand and low-priced imports are reshaping Europe’s silicon metal market.

Ferroglobe silicon shipments dropped by 15.9% year on year to 30,533t in January-March. The company later restarted one of two furnaces at its Anglefort plant in France to maintain an EU operating presence.

Ferroglobe silicon shipments remain under pressure because European production costs are still struggling to compete against lower-cost third-country imports. The company warned that the current market structure is no longer viable during a prolonged period of depressed demand.

The issue is strategically important because silicon metal supports aluminium alloys, silicones, solar materials, semiconductors and industrial chemicals. If European smelting capacity continues to close, the region’s downstream industries will become more dependent on imported feedstock.

European Silicon Metal Faces Low-Cost Import Pressure

Ferroglobe said the European silicon metal market remains under pressure from China and Angola. Angola has emerged as a faster-growing supplier into the EU, increasing its market share during the first two months of 2026.

Angola supplied 993t of silicon metal to the EU in February, up by around two-thirds from a year earlier. Its EU market share more than doubled to 3.3% in January-February from 1.5% a year earlier.

This matters because even modest import share gains can influence pricing when demand is weak. European producers with higher energy and operating costs have limited room to absorb lower selling prices.

Ferroglobe has called for the EU to introduce anti-dumping duties on certain third-country suppliers selling at low prices into the bloc. The company made the request after the European Commission excluded silicon metal from last year’s safeguard investigation.

The policy question is now becoming more urgent. Europe wants strategic materials security, but it also needs trade tools that keep domestic production viable when imports undercut regional cost structures.

Without stronger protection or demand recovery, European silicon metal output could remain constrained. That would weaken the region’s ability to support aluminium, chemicals, solar and advanced manufacturing supply chains from local feedstock.

Ferro-Alloy Sales Offset Silicon Weakness

Ferroglobe’s broader first-quarter performance was supported by stronger silicon-based and manganese-based alloy shipments. This helped offset weaker silicon metal volumes.

Shipments of silicon-based alloys rose by 41.6% year on year to 60,674t. The increase was driven by stronger US demand for ferro-silicon.

However, average selling prices for silicon-based alloys fell by 4.9% to $2,016/t. Competitive conditions in the US and South Africa limited pricing power despite stronger volumes.

Manganese-based alloy sales also improved sharply. Shipments rose by 27.5% to 85,743t, supported by recently implemented safeguard measures.

The average selling price for manganese-based alloys increased by 12.8% to $1,250/t because of higher European prices. This shows how trade measures can directly support pricing when regional supply protection is in place.

Ferroglobe’s total sales rose by 13.2% year on year to $347.7mn. The increase came from higher silicon-based and manganese-based alloy volumes, along with stronger manganese alloy pricing.

Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation increased by 112.5% to $3.3mn. The improvement was meaningful, but margins remain thin for a company operating in volatile alloy and silicon markets.

The company is also considering reopening operations in Venezuela. Those assets are close to the US market and could benefit from low-cost energy, raw materials and favourable logistics.

That strategy reflects the changing economics of ferro-alloy and silicon production. Energy cost, trade access, import protection and proximity to customers are becoming more important than legacy European capacity alone.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Ferroglobe’s results show that Europe’s silicon metal problem is not only weak demand; it is structural cost exposure against lower-priced imports. If the EU wants domestic critical industrial material capacity, silicon metal may need the same policy seriousness now being applied to batteries, magnets and semiconductors.