EMR and Ionic Technologies Partner on Rare Earth Magnet Recycling Supply Chain

Ionic Technologies

UK Magnet Recycling Gains Momentum with EMR-Ionic Technologies Agreement

EMR and Ionic Technologies partner on rare earth magnet recycling, marking a key development in the UK’s circular economy for critical materials. EMR, a leading UK-based metals recycler, has signed a non-binding supply agreement with Ionic Technologies to deliver end-of-life magnets to its Belfast facility. These magnets will serve as feedstock for Ionic’s rare earth oxide (REO) extraction and separation process.

The Belfast demonstration plant, supported by a £1.7 million grant from the UK’s Advanced Propulsion Centre in 2022, can process 30 tonnes per year of waste magnets to yield up to 10 tonnes of high-purity REOs annually. These include critical materials like neodymium, praseodymium, and dysprosium—essential for electric motors, wind turbines, and defense systems. As EMR and Ionic Technologies partner on rare earth magnet recycling, the project aims to secure domestic REO supply and reduce reliance on Chinese imports.

This latest deal builds on Ionic Technologies’ earlier agreement with South Korea’s DNA Link, which could lead to future REO offtake arrangements. Ionic Technologies, a subsidiary of ASX-listed Ionic Rare Earths, is positioning itself at the forefront of rare earth recycling innovation in Europe. As demand for sustainable and secure REO sources accelerates, EMR and Ionic Technologies partner on rare earth magnet recycling to help meet future supply chain needs.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The EMR-Ionic partnership reflects the strategic pivot toward localised, sustainable sourcing of rare earths. With growing geopolitical tension around REO supply, vertically integrated recycling chains like this one could offer both economic and national security advantages.

Belfast Magnet Recycling Grant Strengthens the UK Rare Earth Supply Chain

IonicRE

The Belfast magnet recycling grant gives the UK a stronger position in the rare earth supply chain. Ionic Technologies will receive £12mn from the UK government for a commercial magnet recycling facility in Belfast. The plant will produce high-purity separated magnet rare earth oxides. As a result, the Belfast magnet recycling grant supports both industrial policy and strategic materials security.

This project matters because rare earth recycling is becoming more important in western supply chains. Governments want more local processing capacity for magnet materials. They also want lower dependence on imported rare earth products. Therefore, the Belfast magnet recycling grant reflects a wider push for resilient critical minerals infrastructure.

The planned facility will have capacity of 400 t/yr of separated magnet rare earth oxides. Product purity is expected to exceed 99.5pc. Ionic Technologies will use its long-loop recycling process at the site. Consequently, the project is positioned as a commercial recycling platform, not a pilot concept.

UK Rare Earth Supply Chain Gains a New Industrial Anchor

The UK rare earth supply chain has lacked enough domestic downstream processing capacity. This grant helps address that gap with targeted capital support. IonicRE said the funding will serve as a cornerstone of the project’s investment structure. Therefore, the government is helping reduce financing risk at a critical stage.

The policy context also matters. The grant comes through the UK’s Drive35 programme. That programme supports industrialisation linked to zero-emission vehicle technologies. As a result, the Belfast plant is tied not only to recycling, but also to future transport manufacturing needs.

This alignment could improve long-term project relevance. Magnet rare earth oxides are essential for advanced motors and electrified systems. Stronger domestic recycling can support cleaner industrial growth. Meanwhile, it can reduce exposure to volatile external supply chains.

Rare Earth Recycling Facility Fits a Wider Western Funding Trend

This rare earth recycling facility also fits a broader western investment pattern. IonicRE has already moved to develop vertically integrated rare earth oxide recycling in Missouri. That shows the company is building across more than one jurisdiction. Consequently, Belfast may become part of a larger transatlantic recycling strategy.

The market significance extends beyond its initial size. A 400 t/yr facility will not transform global rare earth balances alone. However, it can prove commercial viability and support regional supply security. Therefore, smaller strategic plants can still matter greatly in critical materials markets.

The Belfast magnet recycling grant also signals a policy shift in how governments support rare earth projects. Instead of focusing only on mining, they are backing recycling and downstream processing. That approach may create faster, more practical gains in supply chain resilience. As a result, recycling is becoming a serious industrial policy tool.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This grant is important because it supports processing capability, not just raw material ambition. The UK is backing a practical route into rare earth security through recycling and purification. If Belfast succeeds, it could become a model for how smaller western projects build strategic value.

IonicRE and DNA Link Partner to Build Western Rare Earth Supply Chain

IonicRE

Belfast-to-Korea E-Waste Recycling Pipeline Targets Permanent Magnet Independence

Ionic Rare Earths (IonicRE) has entered into a non-binding agreement with South Korea-based DNA Link to establish a circular rare earth supply chain. The partnership will center around recycling electronic waste into high-value rare earth oxides for use in permanent magnet manufacturing.

Under the deal, DNA Link will supply swarf and end-of-life magnet waste to Ionic Technologies, IonicRE’s UK-based subsidiary. The Belfast facility currently processes 30 tonnes per year (t/yr) of waste material, yielding approximately 10 t/yr of rare earth oxides, primarily from neodymium, praseodymium, and dysprosium.

Rare Earth Oxides to Feed South Korean Magnet Facility

Once processed in Belfast, the rare earth oxides will be shipped to DNA Link’s upcoming permanent magnet facility in Yesan, South Korea. Slated to launch operations by late 2025, the plant will produce 1,000 t/yr of neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets—a core material in electric motors, wind turbines, and electronics.

This vertically integrated approach aligns with growing geopolitical efforts to reduce dependence on Chinese rare earth supply. Both companies aim to build similar permanent magnet manufacturing capabilities in the United States, expanding their reach across critical Western markets.

Strategic Collaboration Targets Closed-Loop Rare Earth Ecosystem

The deal emphasizes the growing urgency to secure sustainable and resilient rare earth supply chains outside of China. By focusing on recycled feedstock, IonicRE and DNA Link are promoting environmental responsibility while ensuring access to strategic minerals essential to the energy transition.

“This partnership embodies our shared vision of establishing a full rare earth supply chain within western countries,” said Jun Young Lee, CEO of DNA Link. “It offers alternative solutions to dependency on China.”

With rare earth magnets critical to defense, automotive, and clean energy sectors, this collaboration positions both firms to play a pivotal role in reshaping global supply chains.

IonicRE USSM Magnet Recycling Partnership Targets High-Purity Rare Earth Oxides

IonicRE

The IonicRE USSM magnet recycling partnership aims to produce high-purity rare earth oxides from recycled magnets in the US. The IonicRE USSM magnet recycling partnership will recover NdPr and multiple heavy rare earths from end-of-life materials. This IonicRE USSM magnet recycling partnership strengthens circular supply chains for critical minerals used in electric vehicles and advanced electronics.

Technology-driven rare earth recovery in Missouri

US Strategic Metals will operate a Missouri recycling facility that focuses on rare earth extraction from discarded magnets. The plant will recover neodymium–praseodymium oxide plus heavy rare earths like dysprosium and terbium. It will also produce samarium, gadolinium and holmium oxides, which are vital for high-performance permanent magnets.

Ionic Rare Earths will provide the core recycling technology through its UK arm, Ionic Technologies. This technology will allow USSM to produce separated rare earth oxides with purities above 99.5pc. As a result, the project targets magnet-grade products that can directly serve automotive, wind and electronics manufacturers.

Building a rare earth circular economy across three continents

IonicRE already holds a 60pc stake in the Makuutu rare earths project in Uganda. That asset provides a potential primary feedstock base for future value chains. Meanwhile, its joint venture in Brazil with Viridis Mining and Minerals adds refinery and magnet recycling capacity.

Together, these projects position IonicRE across mining, refining and recycling in Africa, South America and now North America. This diversified footprint reduces reliance on single-country supply for key elements like NdPr, dysprosium and terbium. Therefore, the new US partnership helps align resource security with circular economy goals in the rare earth sector.

The Metalnomist Commentary

This deal underlines how magnet recycling is moving from pilot scale to commercially relevant volumes in North America. By combining IonicRE’s technology with USSM’s facility, the partnership could become a template for regional rare earth circularity. The broader footprint across Uganda, Brazil and the US also shows how mid-tier players can stitch together multi-continent supply chains outside China.

Global Solid-State Electrolyte Shipments Surge as Semi-Solid Batteries Scale

Solid state electrolyte

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments are rising rapidly as semi-solid batteries move toward vehicle adoption and full solid-state battery commercialisation advances. Chinese research institute EV Tank said shipments reached 4,100t in 2025, more than doubling from a year earlier.

The increase marks an important early-stage signal for the battery materials industry. Electrolytes are one of the core materials that determine the energy density, safety and commercial viability of solid-state batteries.

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments are still small compared with conventional lithium-ion battery materials. However, the growth rate shows that downstream producers are beginning to prepare for larger semi-solid and solid-state battery output.

EV Tank expects global solid-state electrolyte shipments to reach 229,000t by 2030. That would imply a compound annual growth rate of more than 120% from 2025 to 2030, making electrolytes one of the fastest-growing segments in advanced battery materials.

The forecast reflects both technological progress and industrial positioning. Battery producers, automakers and materials companies are now investing ahead of expected demand from electric vehicles, energy storage systems and high-end electronics.

Semi-Solid Batteries Create the First Commercial Demand Base

Semi-solid batteries are likely to provide the first meaningful demand base for solid-state battery electrolytes. EV Tank expects these batteries to begin vehicle adoption from 2026, ahead of full solid-state battery mass production.

This timing matters because semi-solid batteries can act as a bridge technology. They offer improved safety and performance compared with conventional liquid-electrolyte batteries, while avoiding some of the most difficult technical barriers facing all-solid-state cells.

Semi-solid battery growth is already supporting electrolyte shipments. These products still use electrolyte systems that may differ from fully solid-state designs, but they create early commercial demand for sulphide, oxide, polymer, halide and composite electrolyte materials.

Full solid-state batteries are expected to enter small-scale mass production from 2027. That stage will likely remain limited at first because large-scale production still faces technical, cost and qualification challenges.

The market therefore looks likely to develop in phases. Semi-solid batteries will drive early electrolyte consumption, while full solid-state batteries will gradually expand once production processes, interfaces and reliability improve.

Electrolytes are central to this transition. They influence ion conductivity, safety, cycle life, energy density and compatibility with electrodes. Any weakness in electrolyte performance can limit the entire battery system.

This is why electrolyte development is becoming a strategic battleground. Battery makers cannot scale solid-state technology only by changing cell design. They need stable, high-quality electrolyte materials that can be produced consistently at industrial scale.

Capacity expansion is accelerating in response. EV Tank expects producers with annual electrolyte capacity at the thousand-tonne level to emerge within the next one to two years.

That would mark a shift from laboratory and pilot-scale material production toward early industrial supply. It would also create a more competitive market among electrolyte producers seeking qualification with battery manufacturers.

For battery materials suppliers, this creates a new growth category. Electrolytes may become a higher-value segment within the battery chain, especially if producers can meet strict requirements for purity, particle control, stability and conductivity.

For automakers, the key issue is reliability. Vehicle adoption requires materials that can perform under harsh cycling, temperature and safety conditions. This means electrolyte suppliers must pass long qualification cycles before volume demand can fully develop.

Technology Routes and Cost Cuts Shape the Scale-Up

Solid-state battery electrolyte technology remains diversified, especially in semi-solid batteries. Sulphide, oxide, polymer and halide routes are developing in parallel, while both single-electrolyte and composite-electrolyte solutions are being adopted.

This diversity shows that the industry has not yet settled on a single dominant material route. Different technologies offer different advantages in conductivity, stability, manufacturability, cost and safety.

Sulphide electrolytes currently dominate the roadmap for full solid-state batteries. They offer high ionic conductivity and are widely viewed as one of the most promising routes for high-performance battery cells.

However, sulphide systems also face challenges. They require careful handling, moisture control and interface engineering. These factors can raise production complexity and slow commercial scale-up.

Oxide electrolytes offer strong chemical and thermal stability, but they can face processing and interface resistance challenges. Polymer electrolytes offer manufacturing flexibility, but often struggle with conductivity at room temperature. Halide electrolytes are gaining interest because of their electrochemical stability and potential compatibility with high-voltage cathodes.

Composite electrolyte solutions may become increasingly important. By combining material systems, producers can try to balance conductivity, flexibility, stability and manufacturability.

Cost reduction is also becoming a major commercial driver. EV Tank said improvements in material quality and production processes lowered costs across several technology routes in 2025.

Sulphide electrolyte costs fell by more than 35% during the year. This is significant because cost remains one of the biggest obstacles to wider solid-state battery adoption.

Lower electrolyte costs improve the competitiveness of solid-state batteries against conventional lithium-ion technologies. They also make it easier for battery makers to test commercial deployment in premium vehicles, high-performance energy storage and other demanding applications.

Still, cost reduction alone will not guarantee rapid commercialisation. The industry must also solve interface stability, dendrite control, manufacturing yield, pressure management and long-term cycle reliability.

This explains why some major automakers remain cautious. BYD chief scientist Lian Yubo has said solid-state batteries still face core technical bottlenecks and that liquid and solid-state batteries should develop as complementary technologies.

Great Wall Motor also does not expect large-scale commercialisation of all-solid-state batteries in the near term. This caution suggests that the market may grow strongly, but unevenly.

The commercial pathway is therefore not a simple replacement of liquid batteries. Conventional lithium-ion batteries, semi-solid batteries and full solid-state batteries are likely to coexist for years, each serving different cost and performance segments.

This has important implications for materials demand. Solid-state growth could increase demand for lithium metal, high-nickel cathodes, sulphur-based materials, oxides, halides and specialty chemical precursors. But it may not immediately reduce demand for conventional electrolytes, separators or liquid battery components.

The forecast of 229,000t of global solid-state electrolyte shipments by 2030 points to a large materials opportunity. But the final market size will depend on how quickly automakers adopt semi-solid batteries and how successfully full solid-state batteries move from demonstration to reliable mass production.

For supply chains, qualification will be decisive. Battery makers will not buy electrolyte materials only because capacity exists. They will need stable quality, competitive pricing, proven performance and reliable long-term supply.

For policymakers, solid-state batteries are increasingly tied to advanced manufacturing and energy security. Countries that control electrolyte technology and battery production could gain strategic advantage in next-generation electric vehicles and storage systems.

For the metals market, the key point is that battery innovation changes materials demand before full commercial adoption arrives. Producers begin scaling supply years before the technology reaches mass-market vehicles, creating early demand signals and investment cycles.

Global solid-state electrolyte shipments therefore offer a useful indicator of where advanced battery manufacturing is moving. The numbers remain small, but the growth curve is steep enough to attract capital, competition and supply-chain restructuring.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Solid-state electrolyte growth shows that next-generation battery competition is moving upstream into materials engineering. The market will expand quickly, but full solid-state batteries still need technical proof before they can reshape EV and energy storage supply chains at scale.

California Heavy Rare Earth Project Could Strengthen Harena’s US Critical Minerals Position

Harena Rare Earths

California heavy rare earth project development is moving back into focus as Harena Rare Earths evaluates a potential acquisition of Paradigm Critical Minerals. The UK-based explorer has agreed to assess Paradigm’s rare earth and uranium exploration assets in California, adding a possible US growth pathway to its existing rare earth portfolio.

The proposed transaction could place Harena Rare Earths closer to the center of the US rare earth supply chain. The project sits about 100 miles from MP Materials’ Mountain Pass mine, the only major rare earth mining operation in the US. That location gives the California heavy rare earth project strategic relevance, especially as Washington continues to prioritize domestic critical minerals capacity.

The project was originally developed for gold and silver. However, recent surface exploration has identified rare earth mineralization with an estimated 50:50 ratio of light rare earth elements to heavy rare earth elements. That balance matters because heavy rare earth elements remain a major vulnerability in Western magnet, defense, electronics, and energy transition supply chains.

Heavy Rare Earth Potential Adds Strategic Value

Heavy rare earth elements carry higher strategic importance than their smaller market size suggests. Materials such as dysprosium and terbium are essential for high-performance permanent magnets used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, robotics, aerospace systems, and defense technologies.

Harena Rare Earths said the asset could become one of the highest-grade rare earth exploration projects in the US. That claim still requires detailed due diligence, technical validation, and resource confirmation. However, the early indication of a strong heavy rare earth component gives the California heavy rare earth project a more valuable industrial profile than a light rare earth-only discovery.

The US rare earth supply chain remains heavily exposed to offshore separation and processing capacity. Therefore, any credible domestic heavy rare earth exploration asset can attract attention from investors, policymakers, and downstream manufacturers. The key question is whether the project can move from surface exploration potential to a defined resource with viable metallurgy.

Harena Expands Beyond Madagascar Rare Earths

Harena Rare Earths already owns the Ampasindava ionic clay rare earth project in Madagascar. That asset gives the company exposure to a different rare earth deposit type and a potential non-Chinese supply source. The California evaluation would add a US jurisdictional angle to its portfolio.

The acquisition review also reflects a wider trend in critical minerals markets. Explorers are increasingly repositioning legacy precious metals assets as strategic rare earth or battery material opportunities when geology supports it. This shift is especially visible in the US, where permitting, funding, and industrial policy are pushing companies to revisit domestic mineral districts.

The definitive value of Paradigm Critical Minerals will depend on due diligence results. Harena must assess grade continuity, mineralogy, uranium implications, permitting risk, processing options, and the pathway to downstream separation. Still, the location near Mountain Pass gives the project a stronger strategic narrative than many early-stage rare earth prospects.

The Metalnomist Commentary

The California heavy rare earth project is still early-stage, but its heavy rare earth ratio makes it strategically important. If Harena can prove scale, metallurgy, and permitting viability, the asset could become a meaningful addition to the US critical minerals pipeline.

Energy Fuels Uranium Guidance Could Be Met by Midyear as White Mesa Output Accelerates

Energy Fuels

Energy Fuels uranium guidance could be reached by the end of June as the US producer completes its current ore-processing campaign at the White Mesa Mill in Utah. The company expects uranium oxide production to reach 1.6mn lb by midyear, within its full-year guidance range of 1.5mn-2.5mn lb.

Energy Fuels uranium guidance is significant because White Mesa is currently the only fully licensed and operating conventional uranium mill in the US. That gives the company a strategic position in domestic uranium supply at a time when western governments are trying to rebuild nuclear fuel and critical mineral capacity.

Energy Fuels uranium guidance also reflects stronger mine-to-mill performance from its conventional assets. The company is processing ore from the Pinyon Plain mine in Arizona and the La Sal Complex in Utah, with output expected to average more than 265,000 lb/month of finished uranium during the current campaign.

The company’s shares rose after the operational update, lifting its New York market capitalisation to about $3.6bn. But the stock remains lower year to date, showing that investors still want proof that production strength can translate into durable cash flow and diversified critical materials growth.

White Mesa Mill Strengthens US Uranium Supply Position

White Mesa’s performance is central to Energy Fuels’ role in the US uranium market. The company expects the current processing campaign to finish by the end of June, after which it plans to rebuild ore stockpiles before resuming processing in the fourth quarter.

The timing matters because uranium supply security has become more important for nuclear power, energy security and US strategic fuel planning. Conventional uranium mills are scarce in the US, so steady White Mesa operation gives Energy Fuels a domestic processing advantage that many developers do not have.

Energy Fuels also expects mining performance to improve in the second half of the year. Ore grades and contained uranium are projected to rise, while first-half contained U3O8 production in ore is expected at 750,000-850,000 lb.

The company expects White Mesa ore processing costs of $9-12/lb, near historic lows. Lower processing costs could strengthen margins if uranium prices remain supportive and mine output continues to improve.

This cost performance is especially important because the US uranium sector is still rebuilding after years of underinvestment. Higher grades, reliable ore feed and low processing costs can separate operating producers from companies that only hold development-stage resources.

Energy Fuels said its cost of sales should continue to decline in 2026. If that trend holds, the company could strengthen its position as the leading conventional US uranium producer while maintaining operational flexibility for later processing campaigns.

The midyear guidance achievement would not necessarily mean full-year production stops there. Instead, it would give the company more optionality for the second half, depending on ore availability, mine performance, market conditions and inventory strategy.

Rare Earth Upgrades Add Heavy Rare Earth Growth Path

Energy Fuels is also using White Mesa to build a rare earth separation platform alongside uranium. The mill processes natural monazite sand sourced globally and began commercial separation of rare earth elements two years ago, starting with neodymium-praseodymium.

The company has since added capability for heavy rare earths, including samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium and dysprosium. These materials are important for permanent magnets, defence systems, electronics, high-performance motors and clean-energy technologies.

Energy Fuels plans to begin further modifications to its existing Phase 1 rare earth circuits in July. The upgrades are designed to allow commercial production of heavy rare earths in addition to existing commercial quantities of NdPr.

This is strategically important because heavy rare earth supply remains highly concentrated. Dysprosium and terbium are especially critical for high-performance magnets used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, robotics and defence applications.

The planned modifications will also add a circuit to process uranium-bearing mixed rare earth carbonates from global mines, including material from ionic adsorption clay sources. Because these mixed rare earth carbonates can feed directly into solvent extraction separation, the new circuit could allow White Mesa to process uranium and separated rare earths simultaneously.

That dual-processing model is important. It could turn White Mesa from a uranium mill with rare earth exposure into a more integrated critical minerals facility. The ability to process multiple feedstocks could improve utilisation, diversify revenue and strengthen domestic supply-chain resilience.

Energy Fuels expects the modifications to become operational in late 2027 to early 2028. The company is also planning a Phase 2 expansion that could raise total rare earth capacity at White Mesa to nearly 6,300 t/yr.

Permitting for both the circuit modifications and Phase 2 expansion is proceeding on schedule, according to the company. If delivered, White Mesa could become one of the most important US platforms linking uranium recovery, monazite processing, NdPr separation and heavy rare earth production.

The broader implication is that Energy Fuels is positioning itself across two strategic supply chains at once. Uranium supports nuclear energy security, while rare earth separation supports magnets, defence, electrification and advanced manufacturing.

The Metalnomist Commentary

Energy Fuels’ update shows why existing processing infrastructure is becoming strategically valuable in the US. White Mesa is not only a uranium asset; it could become a rare domestic bridge between nuclear fuel security and heavy rare earth separation.